<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>rhodium &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/rhodium/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 21:12:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>How You Make a Catalyst Matters: Rhodium on Zirconia and the Art of Ring Opening</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/how-you-make-a-catalyst-matters-rhodium-on-zirconia-and-the-art-of-ring-opening/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 21:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catalyst preparation methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catalyst synthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catalyst synthesis routes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catalytic performance differences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cetane number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cracking hydrocarbons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyclohexane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyclohexane ring opening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diesel fuel performance enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel upgrading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heterogeneous catalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrocarbon cracking in fuel processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogenolysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naphthenic hydrocarbon conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhodium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhodium on zirconia catalysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ring opening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ring opening reaction mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface chemistry of catalysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthesis impact on catalyst activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[XPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zirconia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=216377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study shows that the synthesis method used to prepare rhodium-on-zirconia catalysts dramatically controls their surface composition and their selectivity in opening cyclohexane rings to n-hexane.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the quest to squeeze more performance out of every drop of diesel fuel, some of the most important chemistry happens at scales too small to see. A team of Russian researchers has now shown that for one class of promising catalysts, the way the material is assembled in the laboratory can matter as much as the ingredients themselves. Writing in Catalysis Letters, Evgeny V. Abkhalimov, Vadim A. Ershov, Mikhail Yu. Mashkin, Kristina E. Kartavova and Alexander L. Kustov report a systematic comparison of four preparation routes for rhodium-on-zirconia catalysts used to crack open cyclohexane rings, and the results reveal striking differences in surface chemistry and catalytic performance that stem purely from synthesis method.</p>
<p>The reaction at the heart of the study, cyclohexane ring opening, is far more than an academic curiosity. Naphthenic hydrocarbons such as cyclohexane and its alkylated relatives are abundant in the heavy fractions of crude oil, and their closed-ring structures give diesel fuels poor ignition quality, expressed as a low cetane number. Opening the ring converts these cyclic molecules into branched and linear paraffins with markedly better combustion behavior. In principle, a single C-C bond in cyclohexane, when cleaved under hydrogen, yields n-hexane, a straight-chain molecule that burns far more readily in a diesel engine. The challenge is doing this selectively, because the same metal surfaces that open rings can also chop the resulting chains into smaller fragments or trigger unwanted side reactions.</p>
<p>Rhodium has long attracted attention for this task. Among the noble metals tested for hydrogenolysis of naphthenes, rhodium displays a notable ability to cleave C-C bonds while leaving the desired linear products relatively intact, particularly when the metal is dispersed on the right support. Zirconia has emerged as an intriguing candidate support because of its amphoteric surface character, its thermal stability and the way it interacts electronically with deposited metals. Earlier work by some of the same authors had already demonstrated that the nature of the support strongly influences how rhodium catalysts perform in cyclohexane ring opening, which raised the natural follow-up question: does the method used to load the rhodium onto the zirconia matter just as much?</p>
<p>To answer it, the team prepared a series of catalysts, each containing one weight percent rhodium on zirconium dioxide, using four distinct synthesis strategies: wet impregnation, excess-solution impregnation, deposition of the metal by urea hydrolysis, and direct deposition of preformed rhodium nanoparticles. These methods differ subtly but importantly in how the metal precursor encounters the support surface. Wet impregnation floods the pores with a solution containing just enough metal to reach the target loading, while excess impregnation immerses the support in a larger volume of solution. Urea deposition-precipitation relies on the slow, homogeneous release of hydroxide ions to precipitate rhodium species gently across the surface, and nanoparticle deposition introduces the metal as preformed colloidal particles whose size is fixed before they ever touch the oxide.</p>
<p>Once the catalysts were made, the researchers subjected them to a battery of characterization techniques that reads like a tour of modern materials analysis. X-ray diffraction probed the crystal structure of the zirconia support and confirmed the phase composition of each sample. Scanning electron microscopy paired with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy mapped the morphology and elemental distribution, while transmission electron microscopy, aided by fast Fourier transform analysis of the images, resolved the rhodium particles themselves. Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy interrogated the surface chemistry, with the latter revealing how much rhodium actually resides at the outermost surface where catalysis happens. Temperature-programmed reduction in hydrogen completed the picture by measuring how readily the oxidized rhodium species could be reduced to the metallic state.</p>
<p>Two findings from this characterization campaign stand out. First, in the temperature-programmed reduction experiments, every sample consumed more hydrogen than the stoichiometric amount needed to reduce the nominal rhodium oxide loading, a signal of extra hydrogen uptake that the authors attribute to hydrogen interacting with the support or with partially reduced species. The wet impregnation sample showed the highest hydrogen consumption of all, hinting at a particularly rich population of reducible surface species. Second, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy revealed that the catalyst prepared by depositing preformed nanoparticles carried a much higher concentration of rhodium at the surface than its counterparts. That difference, metal sitting where the reactants can actually reach it, would prove decisive in the catalytic tests.</p>
<p>And decisive it was. When the catalysts were evaluated in cyclohexane hydrogenolysis, the nanoparticle-derived sample delivered the highest yield of n-hexane, reaching 17.3 percent at 325 degrees Celsius. Even more striking was its selectivity: at the milder temperature of 275 degrees Celsius, roughly 87 percent of the converted cyclohexane emerged as the desired n-hexane product. In a reaction network where ring opening competes with multiple hydrogenolysis pathways that fragment the molecule, a selectivity approaching nine parts in ten is a genuinely impressive figure. The result ties performance directly to surface accessibility, since rhodium buried inside the porous support or locked in poorly dispersed agglomerates contributes little to the reaction.</p>
<p>The broader lesson resonates well beyond this single reaction. In heterogeneous catalysis, the term structure sensitivity describes reactions whose rate and selectivity depend on the size and geometry of the metal particles. Rhodium nanoparticle size effects have been documented in processes ranging from carbon dioxide reforming of methane to steam reforming, and researchers have shown that atoms at corners and edges of metal nanocrystals can behave very differently from those on flat terraces. By fixing the metal as nanoparticles before deposition, the synthesis route effectively pre-selects the ensemble of surface sites that will do the catalytic work. The new study adds cyclohexane ring opening to the list of reactions where this pre-selection pays measurable dividends, and it does so with a practical implication: catalyst manufacturers can, in effect, tune selectivity by choosing how the metal is introduced.</p>
<p>There is also an energy-transition angle worth noting. Ring-opening chemistry is increasingly discussed in the context of upgrading not only fossil diesel streams but also hydrotreated oils from renewable and waste sources, where naphthenic rings are common. Catalysts that convert these rings selectively into high-cetane linear paraffins at moderate temperatures could improve fuel quality while minimizing hydrogen consumption and unwanted cracking. Zirconia-supported rhodium, with its combination of strong C-C bond activation and high n-hexane selectivity, fits that profile, and the demonstration that a deposition route maximizes surface rhodium concentration offers a concrete recipe for improvement.</p>
<p>Of course, a one-weight-percent rhodium catalyst built on a precious metal remains expensive for bulk fuel applications, and the authors note that no new datasets beyond the study itself were generated. Scaling the nanoparticle deposition approach, stabilizing the particles against sintering under industrial conditions, and exploring cheaper metals that mimic rhodium&#8217;s selectivity are the obvious next steps. But the core message of the work is clean and consequential: in catalysis, the recipe is part of the chemistry. Two catalysts with identical composition on paper can behave entirely differently in a reactor, and the difference traces back to decisions made in a beaker long before the first molecule of cyclohexane arrives. For a field racing to design catalysts rationally rather than by trial and error, that is a reminder worth repeating.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effect of synthesis method on Rh/ZrO2 catalysts for selective cyclohexane ring opening to n-hexane</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Rh/ZrO2 Catalysts for Cyclohexane Ring Opening: A Role of Synthesis Method</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Abkhalimov, E. V., Ershov, V. A., Mashkin, M. Y., Kartavova, K. E., &amp; Kustov, A. L. (2026). Rh/ZrO2 Catalysts for Cyclohexane Ring Opening: A Role of Synthesis Method. <em>Catalysis Letters, 156</em>(10), Article 286. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-026-05524-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-026-05524-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-026-05524-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10562-026-05524-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> rhodium, zirconia, cyclohexane, ring opening, heterogeneous catalysis, nanoparticles, hydrogenolysis, cetane number, fuel upgrading, catalyst synthesis, XPS, selectivity</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">216377</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chiral 2D Framework Turns Rhodium Catalyst Into a Recycling Champion</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/chiral-2d-framework-turns-rhodium-catalyst-into-a-recycling-champion/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 01:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2D metal-organic frameworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advancements in 2D catalyst materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[asymmetric catalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atomic-level catalyst design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BINAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catalyst recovery and reuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catalyst recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chiral 2D metal-organic frameworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chiral ligand anchoring on 2D materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chiral ligand immobilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enantioselectivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hayashi-Miyaura reaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heterogeneous catalyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heterogeneous catalysts vs homogeneous catalysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal-organic frameworks for catalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quasi-homogeneous catalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhodium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhodium catalyst recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[selective chiral product formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface-exposed active sites in catalysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turnover number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultrathin crystalline catalyst sheets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zirconium MOF]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=211858</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers built a zirconium-based two-dimensional metal-organic framework carrying chiral BINAP-derived rhodium sites that achieve over 99 percent yield and enantioselectivity in the Hayashi-Miyaura reaction while delivering up to 99 times the turnover of the homogeneous catalyst and remaining reusable across five runs.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chemists have long faced an awkward trade-off at the heart of asymmetric catalysis. Homogeneous catalysts, in which every active metal complex floats freely in solution, deliver exquisite control over the handedness of the products they form, but recovering those precious metal complexes from the reaction mixture is often a messy, lossy business. Heterogeneous catalysts, by contrast, can be filtered off and reused indefinitely, yet their rigid solid surfaces frequently scramble the delicate three-dimensional interactions that make a chiral catalyst selective in the first place. A study published in Catalysis Letters by Xiao Feng, Chengzhong Huang, Baogang Yang and Yanling Han now reports a design that appears to sidestep this dilemma almost entirely, by anchoring one of the most celebrated chiral ligands in chemistry onto a framework only a few atoms thick.</p>
<p>The material at the center of the work is a two-dimensional metal-organic framework, or 2D MOF, built from zirconium nodes and the tritopic linker 1,3,5-tris(4-carboxyphenyl)benzene, known as H3BTB. These ultrathin crystalline sheets have attracted intense interest in recent years because of three properties that heterogeneous catalysis has historically lacked: atomic-level thickness, ultrahigh specific surface area and a population of active sites that are, by construction, almost fully exposed. Instead of burying catalytic centers deep inside a bulk solid where reactants struggle to reach them, a 2D MOF displays them across its flat surfaces, closer in spirit to the environment a soluble complex enjoys than to that of a conventional solid pellet.</p>
<p>What the team did was to functionalize this scaffold with derivatives of BINAP, the chiral bisphosphine ligand whose discovery helped launch modern asymmetric catalysis and earned a Nobel Prize in 2001. BINAP is what chemists call a privileged ligand: its rigid, twisted binaphthyl backbone imposes a defined chiral pocket on any metal it coordinates, steering reactions toward one mirror-image product over the other. In the new work, BINAP-derived ligands were immobilized within the 2D MOF structure, and the framework was then metallized with rhodium, the same metal that powers some of the most important industrial and pharmaceutical asymmetric transformations. The resulting material, dubbed Zr-BTB-L-Rh, constitutes a well-defined heterogeneous asymmetric catalyst in which the rhodium active species are atomically dispersed rather than clustered into nanoparticles.</p>
<p>That atomically dispersed character proved to be more than a structural nicety. Powder X-ray diffraction, scanning and transmission electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry and high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy were among the techniques used to confirm that the hierarchical porous architecture survived the functionalization and metallization steps intact, with individual rhodium sites distributed throughout. In other words, the catalytic centers inside the framework sit in an environment that resembles a solution-phase complex far more closely than a metal surface, which is why the authors describe the setting as quasi-homogeneous.</p>
<p>The benchmark chosen to test the concept was the asymmetric Hayashi-Miyaura reaction, in which an arylboronic acid adds across 2-cyclohexen-1-one to form a carbon-carbon bond with defined chirality. This reaction is a mainstay of asymmetric synthesis, and a rhodium-BINAP combination is its classical catalyst system, so the comparison with the molecular version was direct and demanding. The heterogeneous Zr-BTB-L-Rh delivered yields above 99 percent and enantioselectivities above 99 percent, matching the selectivity thresholds that chemists usually regard as the gold standard for a practical asymmetric process. Producing essentially one mirror image of the product from a recoverable solid is precisely the outcome that decades of heterogenization efforts have been chasing.</p>
<p>The turnover number, a measure of how many product molecules a single catalytic site can produce, tells an even more striking story. At low catalyst loading, the framework-bound rhodium achieved a turnover number up to 99 times that of its homogeneous counterpart. This is not merely a modest improvement in efficiency; it means each active site in the MOF does nearly two orders of magnitude more chemical work before being retired. The likely explanation lies in the same combination of features the framework provides: every rhodium site is exposed, reactants can diffuse efficiently through the hierarchical pores, and the solid support stabilizes the metal species against the aggregation and decomposition pathways that often cap the lifetime of soluble complexes.</p>
<p>Recyclability, the original motivation for heterogenizing catalysts in the first place, held up as well. The team recovered the catalyst after each run and reused it across five consecutive cycles, during which both activity and enantioselectivity remained stable. For a chiral catalyst, maintaining enantioselectivity through repeated use is the harder of the two demands, because even small structural changes to the chiral pocket, such as ligand oxidation or metal leaching, typically show up first as erosion of product handedness. The stable performance across five runs suggests that the coordination environment inside the MOF remains chemically intact, with the rhodium staying bound to its BINAP-derived ligands rather than drifting out of the framework.</p>
<p>The broader significance of the study lies in its position within a growing effort to build catalytic materials that erase the boundary between homogeneous and heterogeneous regimes. Previous work has explored phosphine-functionalized MOFs, chiral porous hybrid solids for asymmetric hydrogenation, and BINAP-based frameworks for enantioselective cyclization, all pursuing the same idea of a solid material that behaves like a precisely engineered molecule. The new contribution shows that the two-dimensional geometry in particular, with its maximal site exposure and quasi-homogeneous microenvironment, can push that idea to quantitative performance levels that rival, and in turnover terms dramatically exceed, the molecular catalysts that inspired it.</p>
<p>Practically, the design points toward asymmetric synthesis routes in which the valuable rhodium and the even more valuable chiral ligand are capital equipment rather than consumables. In pharmaceutical manufacturing, where enantioselective steps are ubiquitous and metal residues in products are tightly regulated, a catalyst that combines near-perfect selectivity with easy separation and reuse could meaningfully change the economics of a process. The authors report no competing interests, and the structural characterization for the study was supported by the Analysis and Testing Center of Xuzhou University of Technology.</p>
<p>Challenges remain before such frameworks become routine tools. Scaling the synthesis of atomically thin MOF nanosheets, verifying long-term stability across far more than five cycles under real process conditions, and extending the platform beyond the Hayashi-Miyaura benchmark to the full breadth of rhodium-catalyzed asymmetric reactions are all open questions. But the demonstration that a 2D MOF can host BINAP-rhodium sites at 99 percent enantioselectivity with a hundredfold boost in turnover is a clear signal that the next generation of chiral catalysts may be less like dissolved molecules and more like engineered crystal sheets.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Heterogeneous asymmetric catalysis using BINAP-functionalized 2D metal-organic frameworks with atomically dispersed rhodium active sites</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> BINAP-Functionalized 2D Metal-Organic Frameworks for Heterogeneous Rh Catalysts</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> BINAP-Functionalized 2D Metal-Organic Frameworks for Heterogeneous Rh Catalysts. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-026-05528-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-026-05528-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-026-05528-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10562-026-05528-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> asymmetric catalysis, heterogeneous catalyst, 2D metal-organic frameworks, BINAP, rhodium, Hayashi-Miyaura reaction, enantioselectivity, turnover number, zirconium MOF, quasi-homogeneous catalysis, chiral ligand immobilization, catalyst recycling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">211858</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
