The research team, led by geologists from Ekiti State University and collaborating institutions in Nigeria and China, collected 274 samples in December 2023—137 soils and 137 stream sediments—using a hand auger at depths of zero to ten centimeters, the layer where human contact with radionuclides is most direct. The sampling grid covered more than seventy percent of the study area, which lies between the towns of Gana, Pako, Korgadzhi, and Mokwa, and spans terrain underlain by granite gneiss, quartzo-feldspathic gneiss, quartz mica schist, quartzite, and metagraywacke, all intruded by Neoproterozoic Pan-African granitic rocks. These metamorphic and igneous units contain varying amounts of radioactive minerals, which weathering steadily releases into nearby soils and drainage systems.

Analysis was performed using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry at the Bureau Veritas Minerals Laboratory in Vancouver, Canada, with quality assurance anchored to the IAEA-375 reference material. Concentrations measured in parts per million were converted to becquerels per kilogram using standard International Atomic Energy Agency conversion factors. The results showed that uranium-238 activity in soils ranged from 2.11 to 77.38 Bq/kg with a mean of 12.95 Bq/kg, thorium-232 ranged from 8.08 to 66.25 Bq/kg with a mean of 26.87 Bq/kg, and potassium-40 spanned 1.57 to 178.41 Bq/kg with a mean of 39.77 Bq/kg. All three soil averages fell below the UNSCEAR worldwide benchmarks, painting Jebba’s farmland in a comparatively reassuring light.

The stream sediments, however, were a different matter entirely. Uranium-238 in sediments averaged 26.21 Bq/kg, roughly double the soil value, and thorium-232 averaged 109.39 Bq/kg—more than four times the soil mean and well above the international standard limit, with individual samples reaching a remarkable 572.47 Bq/kg. Potassium-40 remained modest at an average of 48.16 Bq/kg. The radium equivalent activity, a composite index that weights the three radionuclides according to their gamma-emission potential, averaged 54.44 Bq/kg in soils but 186.34 Bq/kg in sediments, with a maximum of 926.17 Bq/kg—far beyond the 370 Bq/kg ceiling considered acceptable for construction materials.

The dose metrics reinforce this divide. The average absorbed gamma dose rate was 24.23 nGy/h for soils but 82.05 nGy/h for sediments, against a global outdoor average of 57 nGy/h. The internal hazard index, which captures the respiratory risk from inhaling radon and thoron gases released by building materials, averaged 0.41 for soils—comfortably below the safety threshold of one—but 1.44 for sediments, meaning that if these sediments were quarried and used in home construction, occupants could face meaningful internal exposure. External hazard indices followed the same pattern, with sediments approaching the unity limit at a mean of 0.94 while soils sat at just 0.26.

Perhaps the most consequential finding concerns long-term cancer risk. The excess lifetime cancer risk values ranged from 0.33 to 2.43 for soils but from 0.71 to 18.10 for stream sediments, exceeding UNSCEAR thresholds across both media but dramatically so in the depositional environments. The annual effective dose equivalent for indoor scenarios built on sediment-derived material also surpassed global averages. Organ-specific calculations identified the testes as the most vulnerable tissue, followed by bone marrow, lungs, and ovaries, with total effective dose rates reaching 8.16 mSv per year for sediments compared with 2.30 mSv per year for soils.

Statistical analysis pinpointed the culprit behind these hazards. Pearson correlation matrices revealed that thorium-232 correlated almost perfectly with nearly every radiological index—r values exceeding 0.99 for radium equivalent, hazard indices, and the annual gonadal dose equivalent in sediments—while potassium-40 showed weak correlations below 0.1, reflecting its comparatively low gamma emission. Principal component analysis confirmed the pattern: in soils, the first component explained 90.91 percent of total variance and grouped thorium with all the integrated hazard indices, while uranium and potassium clustered separately. In sediments, the first component accounted for 92.58 percent of variance and pulled thorium, radium equivalent, and the hazard metrics into a single dominant cluster.

The spatial distribution of the radionuclides maps directly onto the region’s geology and hydrology. Uranium activities peaked in the southeastern sector around the Jebba Hills, consistent with weathering of uranium-bearing minerals, while thorium concentrated in the southwestern and northern zones near Shika and the Moga Hills. Potassium-40 showed a gradient toward the south and southwest, reflecting the distribution of feldspar- and mica-rich rocks. Elevated radium equivalent values near the hills suggest geochemical leaching from elevated terrain into surrounding soils, and sediment enrichment around Bajijo and the southern areas points to the decisive role of erosion, transport, and deposition in concentrating fine-grained, radionuclide-bearing particles in stream channels. The authors also note that agricultural practices may contribute: phosphate-based NPK fertilizers, derived from naturally enriched phosphate rocks, can accumulate uranium and thorium in soils through repeated application, while irrigation water carrying dissolved potassium-40 and uranium adds to the radiological load.

Why do sediments outperform soils as radiation reservoirs? The physics and chemistry of sorption provide the answer. Fine-grained particles offer large surface areas and chemically reactive mineral surfaces onto which dissolved radionuclides adsorb readily, promoting their deposition and accumulation in bottom sediments. Once trapped, however, these radionuclides are not permanently immobilized: shifts in pH, redox potential, or organic matter content can remobilize them—under reducing conditions, for instance, uranium can convert to more soluble forms and diffuse back into the water column—while flooding, dredging, and storm events can resuspend contaminated particles and increase their bioavailability. Benthic organisms that ingest contaminated particles can then carry radionuclides into the aquatic food web, opening pathways for bioaccumulation and trophic transfer to humans.

The study’s implications extend beyond Jebba. Across much of West Africa, rural communities routinely draw sand and sediment from streams and riverbeds for building construction, and the finding that Jebba’s sediments exceed internal hazard thresholds sounds a cautionary note for any similar geological setting. The authors recommend continuous monitoring, denser spatial sampling to refine hotspot maps, measurement of additional radionuclides such as cesium-137 and cobalt-60, evaluation of radon emissions from soils and sediments, and the integration of radiological assessments into Nigeria’s national environmental management frameworks. They acknowledge limitations—a single-season snapshot, no epidemiological linkage to actual health outcomes, and limited treatment of hydrodynamic transport—but the core message stands: in this corner of the Niger River basin, thorium-232 is the primary risk driver, and the sediments that quietly collect it in the region’s waterways deserve far closer attention than the ground above them.

Subject of Research: Distribution and radiological health risks of natural radionuclides in soils and stream sediments in Jebba, Nigeria

Article Title: Distribution of 238U, 232Th, and 40K in soils and stream sediments in the Jebba area, Nigeria-an integrated environmental, health and radiological risk assessment

Article References: OlaOlorun, O. A., Popoola, O. J., Oyebamiji, A. O., Abdu‑Raheem, Y. A., & Ukaogo, P. (2025). Distribution of 238U, 232Th, and 40K in soils and stream sediments in the Jebba area, Nigeria-an integrated environmental, health and radiological risk assessment. BMC Environmental Science, 2(1), Article 21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44329-025-00035-5

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1186/s44329-025-00035-5

Keywords: radionuclides, uranium-238, thorium-232, potassium-40, stream sediments, radiological risk, Nigeria, Jebba, natural radioactivity, cancer risk, soil contamination, environmental health