<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>quorum quenching &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/quorum-quenching/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 08:51:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Marine Algae and Fungi Yield Compounds That Silence Bacterial Communication</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/marine-algae-and-fungi-yield-compounds-that-silence-bacterial-communication/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Howard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 08:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AHL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-virulence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antibiotic resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autoinducer signaling pathways in bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioactive compounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofilm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofilm prevention using marine natural products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combating pathogenic bacterial communication in marine environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disruption of bacterial communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESKAPE pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fungi-derived quorum sensing inhibitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[halogenated furanones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine algae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine algae antibacterial compounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine bioactive molecules against antibiotic resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine biotechnology for infection control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine fungi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine natural products targeting LuxR and LuxI proteins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural antivirulence agents from ocean organisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quorum quenching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quorum sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quorum sensing inhibition as alternative antimicrobial strategy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=234286</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review details how bioactive compounds from marine algae and fungi disrupt quorum sensing, offering an anti-virulence strategy against antibiotic-resistant pathogens without imposing selection pressure.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deep beneath the ocean surface, a quiet chemical war has been raging for millions of years, and scientists are now learning to exploit it. A comprehensive review published in Blue Biotechnology examines how bioactive compounds extracted from marine algae and fungi can disrupt quorum sensing, the bacterial communication system that coordinates virulence, biofilm formation, and antibiotic resistance. As antibiotic-resistant pathogens continue to spread at an alarming rate, these marine-derived molecules offer a fundamentally different approach to fighting infection: rather than killing bacteria outright, they simply prevent them from talking to each other, disarming them without imposing the lethal selection pressure that drives resistance.</p>
<p>Quorum sensing was first discovered in the bioluminescent marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri, which glows only when its population reaches a critical density. The mechanism relies on small signaling molecules called autoinducers, which bacteria release into their environment. When the concentration of these molecules crosses a threshold, a signal cascade triggers coordinated gene expression across the entire population. In Gram-negative bacteria, the dominant autoinducers are N-acyl-homoserine lactones, or AHLs, produced by LuxI-type synthases and detected by LuxR-type receptor proteins. Gram-positive bacteria instead use modified oligopeptides that interact with membrane-bound sensor kinases, while autoinducer-2, built from the precursor 4,5-dihydroxy-2,3-pentanedione, serves as a potential universal signal shared across both bacterial groups.</p>
<p>The stakes of this communication system are enormous. In opportunistic pathogens such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, more than six percent of genes linked to pathogenesis are controlled by quorum sensing. During the early stages of infection, virulence genes remain largely silent, but once population density reaches a threshold, the system upregulates the production of toxins, lytic enzymes, adhesion molecules, and siderophores, driving disease progression. Biofilm formation, one of the most clinically troublesome bacterial behaviors, is also quorum-regulated, which explains why biofilm-based infections are among the most persistent and difficult to treat in modern medicine.</p>
<p>Marine eukaryotes have evolved sophisticated chemical defenses against bacterial neighbors, and these defenses are proving to be a treasure trove of quorum sensing inhibitors. The red macroalga Delisea pulchra produced the first naturally discovered quorum sensing inhibitor: halogenated furanones, compounds that structurally mimic AHLs except for a furan ring in place of the homoserine lactone ring. These furanones bind to LuxR-type proteins, destabilizing them and accelerating their turnover, thereby preventing the activation of quorum-regulated genes. The same alga has become one of the most extensively studied sources of anti-quorum sensing compounds, and its surface-associated furanones also explain its powerful antifouling properties.</p>
<p>Other algae contribute their own chemical arsenals. The red macroalga Ahnfeltiopsis flabelliformis yielded three AHL antagonists identified through bioactivity-guided fractionation: floridoside, betonicine, and isethionic acid. Notably, while commercial isethionic acid alone showed no activity, the combination of floridoside and isethionic acid effectively inhibited quorum sensing, suggesting synergistic interactions between algal metabolites. The marine macroalga Asparagopsis taxiformis produced 2-dodecanoyloxyethanesulfonate, which blocked quorum sensing in both Chromobacterium violaceum CV026 and Serratia liquefaciens MG44. Even microalgae participate in this chemical interference: Chlorella saccharophila extracts suppressed violacein production and bioluminescence without affecting cell density, while Chlamydomonas reinhardtii secretes compounds that mimic bacterial signals and scramble their communication networks.</p>
<p>Marine fungi represent an equally promising but less explored reservoir. Kojic acid, isolated from the fungus Alternaria sp. associated with the green alga Ulva pertusa, suppressed quorum-dependent luminescence in reporter strains at concentrations above 36 micromolar. Equisetin, derived from the marine fungus Fusarium sp. Z10, reduced biofilm formation, swarming motility, pyocyanin biosynthesis, and elastase production in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, implicating inhibition of the las, rhl, and Pseudomonas quinolone signal systems. Asteltoxin from Penicillium sp. QF046 outperformed the synthetic furanone positive control in suppressing violacein production. Meleagrin, obtained from Penicillium chrysogenum isolated from coastal slime in Korea, inhibited quorum sensing in C. violaceum CV017 with a minimum inhibitory concentration of 138.42 millimolar, while also acting as a novel bacterial enoyl-acyl carrier protein reductase inhibitor.</p>
<p>The diversity of fungal compounds continues to impress. From Penicillium sp. SCS-KFD08, recovered from the marine mammal Sipunculus nudus in Haikou Bay, researchers isolated six quorum sensing inhibitors including aculene C-E, penicitor B, and aspergillumarin A and B, which reduced violacein production by 46 and 49 percent at sub-inhibitory concentrations. Endophytic fungi from coral reefs, including species of Sarocladium, Fusarium, Epicoccum, and Khuskia, showed strong activity at doses between 50 and 500 micrograms per milliliter. Fusaric acid and linoleic acid, isolated from these strains, disrupt quorum sensing systems, and microwave-assisted synthesis of 39 fusaric acid analogs revealed that the C-2 ester group is essential for inhibition because it mimics the intermolecular interactions required by the lactone moiety of natural signal molecules.</p>
<p>Perhaps most clinically relevant is the activity of these compounds against the ESKAPE pathogens, the group of highly virulent bacteria that includes Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter species. Citrinin from Penicillium sp. JH1, found in offshore waters near Qingdao, China, suppressed violacein synthesis and reduced the production of elastase, rhamnolipid, and pyocyanin in P. aeruginosa PAO1, while also downregulating nine quorum sensing genes. Tyrosol from Penicillium chrysogenum DXY-1 reduced pyocyanin synthesis by 63.3 percent and elastase activity by 57.8 percent. Extracts from Pestalotiopsis sydowiana PPR decreased biofilm formation by over 90 percent, and in silico docking suggested its metabolites cyclo-leucine-proline and 4-hydroxyphenylacetamide interact with the LasR and RhlR receptor proteins in ways resembling native signaling molecules.</p>
<p>Against Gram-positive ESKAPE members, the results are equally striking. An Aspergillus fumigatus extract from Moringa oleifera inhibited S. aureus and K. pneumoniae biofilm development by 69.2 and 57.66 percent respectively. Emodin from the mangrove-derived fungus Eurotium chevalieri reduced staphylococcal biofilm formation by 80 percent, while vulculic acid from Chaetosphaeronema achilleae achieved 96.82 percent biofilm inhibition at 256 micrograms per milliliter. The cyclic dipeptide cyclo-tyrosine-proline from Penicillium chrysogenum DXY-1 reduced quorum-mediated virulence factors in P. aeruginosa at sub-inhibitory concentrations, demonstrating that these compounds can attenuate pathogenicity without killing cells, precisely the property that minimizes resistance development.</p>
<p>Beyond medicine, quorum quenching holds promise for biotechnology and environmental engineering. Biofouling, the unwanted accumulation of organisms on submerged surfaces, costs naval transport, aquaculture, and water treatment industries billions annually, and traditional antifouling agents like tributyltin have been banned for their devastating ecological effects. Vanillin combined with cellulose acetate membranes prevents biofilm in reverse osmosis systems, and AHL-degrading bacteria improve wastewater treatment performance. Quorum sensing inhibitors can also enhance conventional antibiotics: cinnamic acid derivatives increased biofilm sensitivity to tobramycin. The review&#8217;s authors caution, however, that the field lacks standardized methods for evaluating inhibitor efficacy, and that future studies must test compounds under conditions that closely mimic in vivo infections rather than relying solely on laboratory-adapted strains. As research moves from the phycosphere to the clinic, the ocean&#8217;s chemical conversations may well provide the next generation of anti-virulence therapies.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Marine algae- and fungi-derived bioactive compounds that inhibit bacterial quorum sensing</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Bioactive compounds from marine algae and fungi in down-regulating quorum sensing</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Bioactive compounds from marine algae and fungi in down-regulating quorum sensing. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s44315-024-00018-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s44315-024-00018-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s44315-024-00018-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s44315-024-00018-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> quorum sensing, quorum quenching, marine algae, marine fungi, bioactive compounds, antibiotic resistance, biofilm, ESKAPE pathogens, halogenated furanones, AHL, anti-virulence, natural products</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">234286</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Root Signals and Microbial Allies Redefine Sustainable Crop Disease Control</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/root-signals-and-microbial-allies-redefine-sustainable-crop-disease-control/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 21:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artificial intelligence in crop protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bacillus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biocontrol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-smart biocontrol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[induced systemic resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial allies for crop health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial community engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-omics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-omics technologies in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mycorrhizal fungi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant immune signaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-microbe interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudomonas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quorum quenching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resistance management in plant pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhizosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhizosphere microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root exudates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil ecosystem services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil health and biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable crop disease control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trichoderma]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=223634</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review in MicrobiologyOpen details how rhizosphere microbiomes, molecular signaling, omics technologies, and artificial intelligence are converging to create eco-smart biocontrol strategies that suppress crop pathogens while reducing pesticide dependence.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quiet revolution is unfolding beneath the surface of the world&#8217;s croplands. In the narrow zone of soil that hugs plant roots, known as the rhizosphere, an intricate ecosystem of bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, archaea, and protists is being reimagined as the backbone of a new generation of crop protection. A comprehensive review published in MicrobiologyOpen maps out how this ecosystem can be deliberately harnessed in what the authors call eco-smart biocontrol: a knowledge-intensive, systemic approach to managing plant disease that moves far beyond the old model of spraying a single antagonistic microbe and hoping it survives in the field. The review, led by Shilpy Singh and colleagues, synthesizes recent advances in rhizosphere ecology, molecular signaling, multi-omics technologies, and artificial intelligence to argue that the future of plant protection lies not in isolated silver bullets but in engineered, self-sustaining microbial communities that communicate continuously with their plant hosts.</p>
<p>The urgency behind this shift is difficult to overstate. Decades of heavy reliance on synthetic pesticides have produced a cascade of unintended consequences: pathogens evolving resistance, soil biodiversity eroding, food contaminated with chemical residues, and essential ecosystem services disrupted. Stricter regulations and growing consumer demand for residue-free food have accelerated the search for biologically grounded alternatives. Yet traditional biocontrol has struggled to deliver consistent results, because a single strain applied in isolation often fails to persist under the unpredictable conditions of a real field. Eco-smart biocontrol reframes the problem entirely. Instead of treating symptoms with a biological fungicide, it aims to cultivate a resilient rhizosphere microbiome that suppresses pathogens, primes plant immunity, and adapts to changing environmental pressures, an approach that aligns closely with climate-smart agriculture, sustainable intensification, and the One Health framework.</p>
<p>At the heart of this paradigm is the rhizosphere itself, a soil microhabitat defined by steep physicochemical gradients and extraordinary biological activity. Plant roots continuously secrete a rich cocktail of compounds, collectively termed rhizodeposition, including sugars, amino acids, organic acids, mucilage, sloughed-off cells, and specialized secondary metabolites. These exudates act simultaneously as nutrients and as chemical signals, selectively recruiting and shaping the microbial communities that gather around the root. Simple sugars such as glucose and sucrose drive chemotaxis and colonization by bacteria, while phenolic compounds can inhibit soil-borne pathogens and stimulate beneficial plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Flavonoids serve as symbiotic signals in mutualistic partnerships, most famously in the legume-rhizobia relationship. Crucially, the composition of these exudates is highly plastic, modulated by plant genotype, developmental stage, nutrient status, and stress, allowing the plant to adjust its microbial entourage according to its physiological needs.</p>
<p>The microbial cast assembled by these signals is remarkably diverse and functionally complementary. Bacteria, particularly members of the Proteobacteria, Actinobacteriota, Bacteroidota, and Firmicutes, dominate numerically and respond rapidly to root-derived carbon. Fungi, including saprophytes, endophytes, and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, decompose organic matter, mobilize nutrients, and build soil aggregates. Actinomycetes, especially Streptomyces species, are prolific producers of antibiotics and are hallmark inhabitants of naturally disease-suppressive soils. Archaea, though less abundant, contribute to nitrogen and methane cycling under nutrient-limited conditions, while protists graze on bacteria, recycling nutrients and indirectly favoring plant-beneficial traits. Together these groups form a tightly linked, multitrophic network whose collective activity determines whether pathogens flourish or fail in the root zone.</p>
<p>The mechanisms by which beneficial microbes suppress disease are as varied as they are elegant. Competition for iron is a classic example: beneficial pseudomonads and Bacillus species secrete siderophores, high-affinity iron-chelating molecules that starve pathogens of this essential micronutrient. Direct antagonism takes many forms, from cyclic lipopeptides such as surfactin, iturin, and fengycin produced by Bacillus, which rupture pathogen cell membranes, to aromatic antibiotics like phenazines, pyrrolnitrin, and 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol synthesized by Pseudomonas and Streptomyces strains. Volatile organic compounds, including hydrogen cyanide and acetoin, diffuse through the soil matrix to inhibit pathogen growth while simultaneously priming plant defense genes. Fungal mycoparasites such as Trichoderma coil around pathogen hyphae and enzymatically dismantle their cell walls with chitinases and glucanases, while predatory bacteria like Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus hunt and lyse pathogenic microbes. Perhaps most sophisticated is quorum quenching, in which beneficial microbes deploy lactonases and acylases to degrade the N-acyl-homoserine lactone signals that pathogens use to coordinate virulence, disrupting their attacks without imposing strong selection for resistance.</p>
<p>Beyond direct antagonism, beneficial microbes reprogram the plant&#8217;s own immune system. Induced systemic resistance, or ISR, is triggered by nonpathogenic root colonizers and is governed primarily by jasmonic acid and ethylene signaling, providing broad-spectrum protection against fungi, bacteria, and even insects with minimal cost to plant growth. Systemic acquired resistance, or SAR, by contrast, follows localized infection and depends on salicylic acid and pathogenesis-related proteins, offering durable defense against biotrophic pathogens. These pathways are not isolated; substantial crosstalk allows plants to fine-tune their immune responses to the type of attacker they face. A key feature of microbe-induced resistance is defense priming: rather than keeping expensive defenses permanently switched on, primed plants maintain a heightened state of alert, enabling faster and stronger activation of defense genes, reactive oxygen bursts, and WRKY transcription factors upon pathogen contact. Emerging evidence suggests that priming can rest on epigenetic marks such as histone methylation and acetylation, creating immune memory that sometimes persists across generations at little fitness cost.</p>
<p>The molecular dialogues underpinning these interactions are proving far richer than previously imagined. Plants detect conserved microbial molecules, or MAMPs, through pattern recognition receptors such as the flagellin receptor FLS2, launching pattern-triggered immunity. Yet plants can also discriminate: rhizobial Nod factors are perceived through LysM-domain receptors that initiate symbiosis while dampening immune activation, and similar discrimination operates with mycorrhizal fungi and endophytes. Even more striking is the discovery of cross-kingdom RNA trafficking, in which small RNAs move between plants and microbes, allowing each side to modulate the other&#8217;s gene expression. Metabolomics, using mass spectrometry-based imaging, is now mapping the spatial distribution of exudates and microbial metabolites across the root, revealing how specific chemical profiles create disease-suppressive rhizospheres and linking metabolite signatures to induced systemic resistance.</p>
<p>Translating this mechanistic knowledge into reliable products has long been the field&#8217;s Achilles heel, but new technologies are closing the gap. Metagenomics and metatranscriptomics, together with metagenome-assembled genomes, allow researchers to identify keystone taxa and biocontrol gene clusters in uncultivated communities, while proteomics and imaging metabolomics verify that the relevant machinery is actually expressed in situ. Machine learning models, including random forests, gradient boosting, and deep neural networks, sift through these high-dimensional datasets to predict strain performance across environments, and explainable AI frameworks are making those predictions interpretable enough to guide rational consortium design. On the delivery side, encapsulation in alginate and chitosan beads, seed coatings, biochar-based carriers, and stress-protective formulations are extending shelf life and improving establishment, addressing the desiccation, ultraviolet exposure, and competition from native microbiota that have historically doomed field performance.</p>
<p>Field evidence is accumulating across cropping systems. In wheat, combinations of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Trichoderma have reduced stem and root diseases while boosting antioxidant enzyme activity, biomass, and grain yield. Rice treated with plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria shows reduced sheath blight and improved seedling vigor. In legumes, Trichoderma applications have lowered root rot and Fusarium wilt in chickpea, pigeon pea, and soybean while enhancing nodulation and nitrogen fixation, and fungal agents such as Purpureocillium lilacinum have suppressed root-knot nematodes. Horticultural systems offer equally compelling results: tomato crops treated with Trichoderma afroharzianum and the mycorrhizal fungus Funneliformis mosseae yielded more marketable fruit with less damage from the pest Tuta absoluta, while the bacterium Pantoea agglomerans has controlled fire blight in apple and pear orchards with efficacy comparable to chemical treatments.</p>
<p>Significant obstacles remain before eco-smart biocontrol can transform agriculture at scale. Field performance is still inconsistent, because soil type, temperature, moisture, salinity, and native microbial competition all influence whether introduced agents survive and function. Regulatory pathways add friction: the United States Environmental Protection Agency operates a tiered framework under FIFRA with expedited review for microbial pesticides, while the European Union&#8217;s hazard-based criteria under Regulation EC No 1107/2009 impose heavier data burdens and longer market entry timelines. Grower perceptions, limited extension services, and sparse region-specific validation further slow adoption. The review&#8217;s authors argue that the path forward lies in shifting from trial-and-error single strains to predictive microbiome engineering, powered by multi-omics data, AI-driven screening, smart encapsulation, and harmonized, science-based regulation. If those pieces come together, the microscopic conversations happening in the soil beneath every crop could become one of agriculture&#8217;s most powerful tools for feeding the world without poisoning it.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Microbe-plant interactions in the rhizosphere and their application in eco-smart biological control of crop diseases</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> From Rhizosphere to Resistance: Microbe‐Plant Interactions in Eco‐Smart Biocontrol</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Singh, S., Sharma, V. K., Shrivastav, D., Kushwaha, J. M., Mishra, M. K., &amp; Beg, M. M. A. (2026). From Rhizosphere to Resistance: Microbe‐Plant Interactions in Eco‐Smart Biocontrol. <em>MicrobiologyOpen, 15</em>(5), Article e70398. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.70398" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.70398</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.70398" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1002/mbo3.70398</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> rhizosphere, biocontrol, plant microbiome, induced systemic resistance, root exudates, Trichoderma, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, mycorrhizal fungi, quorum quenching, multi-omics, sustainable agriculture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">223634</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
