<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>quarantine &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/quarantine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:43:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>New Antibody Tests Outperform PCR in Detecting Devastating Rice Panicle Blight Pathogens</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-antibody-tests-outperform-pcr-in-detecting-devastating-rice-panicle-blight-pathogens/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 00:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burkholderia glumae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burkholderia glumae and Burkholderia plantarii identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burkholderia plantarii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colloidal gold immunochromatographic strip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dot-ELISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dot-ELISA and colloidal gold immunochromatographic strip for rice disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global spread of]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of rice bacterial panicle blight on crop yields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monoclonal antibody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-laboratory-based diagnostic tests for rice diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant disease diagnostics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarantine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapid diagnostic platforms for rice pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice bacterial panicle blight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rice bacterial panicle blight detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice disease diagnostic tools in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seed-borne pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sensitive detection methods for rice bacterial pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serological detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serological techniques outperform PCR in plant pathogen detection]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=213679</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Chinese researchers have developed monoclonal antibody-based Dot-ELISA and colloidal gold strip tests that detect the rice bacterial panicle blight pathogens Burkholderia glumae and Burkholderia plantarii more sensitively than PCR within minutes.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rice farmers and quarantine inspectors may soon have a powerful new weapon against one of the world&#8217;s most destructive rice diseases. A research team in China has developed two rapid diagnostic platforms—a dot-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Dot-ELISA) and a colloidal gold immunochromatographic strip (CGICS)—that can detect Burkholderia glumae and Burkholderia plantarii, the primary bacterial agents behind rice bacterial panicle blight (RBPB). Remarkably, both serological techniques proved more sensitive than conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the current gold standard in molecular diagnostics, while requiring no expensive laboratory equipment. The work, published in the journal Crop Health, addresses a long-standing gap: until now, no serological tools existed for detecting these quarantine-significant pathogens.</p>
<p>Rice bacterial panicle blight was first documented in Japan in the 1950s and has since spread to rice-growing regions across Africa, Asia, North America, and South America. The disease typically causes yield losses of around 15 percent, but a severe outbreak in Vietnam in 1992 demonstrated its devastating potential, with recorded losses reaching as high as 75 percent. The pathogens behind the disease are Gram-negative bacteria of the Burkholderia genus, with B. glumae acting as the dominant causal agent. Surveys of diseased rice plants in the United States found that B. glumae, B. gladioli, B. multivorans, and B. plantarii together accounted for 90 percent of isolated Burkholderia strains, underscoring the central role these species play in the disease.</p>
<p>Diagnosing RBPB in the field is notoriously difficult. Typical symptoms include browning of the flag leaf sheath and ligule, death of the panicle, and a sharp demarcation between diseased and healthy grains—the upper portion of infected grains appears water-soaked, grayish-white, or yellowish-brown while the lower part remains normal. Yet other pathogens and abiotic stresses can produce similar symptoms, making symptom-based diagnosis inaccurate and untimely. Complicating matters further, the bacteria are seed-borne and can persist in a dormant state within seedlings, only triggering disease later in the growing season, from booting through heading. Warm, humid conditions favor outbreaks: the optimal growth temperature for B. glumae sits between 30 and 35 degrees Celsius, making tropical and subtropical regions particularly vulnerable.</p>
<p>Existing diagnostic approaches have significant drawbacks. Conventional methods rely on pathogen isolation and cultivation, pathogenicity analysis, Biolog microbial identification, and fatty acid profiling—all labor-intensive procedures. Molecular approaches based on PCR target genomic loci such as the internal transcribed spacer between the 16S and 23S rRNA genes and the gyrB gene, but they demand thermal cyclers, electrophoresis equipment, trained technicians, and multiple handling steps. One multiplex PCR assay designed to detect B. plantarii in rice seeds exhibited a sensitivity of only 1.0 × 10⁸ colony-forming units (CFU) per milliliter, insufficient for low-concentration samples. Serological techniques, by contrast, offer simplicity, speed, low cost, and suitability for high-throughput screening at ports and in the field.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Jie Dong and Jianxiang Wu of Zhejiang University, began by generating monoclonal antibodies against the two target pathogens. They used formaldehyde-inactivated cells of B. glumae strain Os48 and B. plantarii strain ZJ171 as immunogens, injecting them into BALB/c mice emulsified with Freund&#8217;s adjuvant. Spleen lymphocytes from the mice with the highest serum titers were fused with Sp2/0 myeloma cells using polyethylene glycol, and hybridoma lines were screened by indirect ELISA and cloned by limiting dilution. This process yielded two hybridoma lines secreting antibodies against B. glumae, designated 4A7 and 8C5, and two secreting antibodies against B. plantarii, designated 12B5 and 14B3. All four monoclonal antibodies were identified as IgG1 with kappa light chains and exhibited high titers of 10⁻⁷.</p>
<p>The high antigenic similarity among Burkholderia species makes antibody specificity a formidable challenge, since cross-reactivity between closely related species is a common pitfall. The team&#8217;s specificity testing, however, delivered striking results. The Dot-ELISAs built on antibodies 4A7 and 8C5 detected all five tested B. glumae strains while showing no cross-reaction with B. plantarii, B. gladioli, B. vietnamiensis, B. ambifaria, B. cenocepacia, B. pyrrocinia, B. cepacia, or control bacteria including Xanthomonas oryzae and Acidovorax oryzae. Similarly, the antibodies 12B5 and 14B3 recognized all three tested B. plantarii strains without reacting with any of the thirteen non-target organisms. This clean discrimination across the notoriously slippery Burkholderia genus is one of the study&#8217;s most significant achievements.</p>
<p>Sensitivity figures were equally impressive. The Dot-ELISAs detected B. glumae or B. plantarii at concentrations as low as 1.96 × 10⁴ CFU per milliliter—roughly two to four times more sensitive than the conventional PCR assays run in parallel, which detected the pathogens only down to 3.91 × 10⁴ and 7.81 × 10⁴ CFU per milliliter respectively. In infected rice grain homogenates, the Dot-ELISAs produced positive results at dilutions of 1:7680, twice the sensitivity of PCR, which reached only 1:3840. The assay procedure is straightforward: ground rice grain samples are homogenized in phosphate-buffered saline, spotted onto nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with the monoclonal antibody followed by an enzyme-conjugated secondary antibody. A purple dot signals infection within roughly two hours.</p>
<p>For true on-site testing, the team engineered colloidal gold immunochromatographic strips—lateral-flow devices similar in principle to at-home pregnancy tests. Thirty-nanometer gold nanoparticles were synthesized by citrate reduction and conjugated with the monoclonal antibodies. After systematic optimization of capture antibody concentration, gold-labeled antibody loading, and pH adjustment with potassium carbonate, the finished strips delivered results in just five to ten minutes from a drop of sample on the pad. Two red lines indicate a positive result; a single control line indicates a negative one. The strips detected both pathogens at concentrations as low as 9.78 × 10³ CFU per milliliter, making them four to eight times more sensitive than conventional PCR, and they matched the Dot-ELISA&#8217;s 1:7680 detection limit in infected grain homogenates.</p>
<p>Field validation sealed the case. The researchers collected fourteen rice samples suspected of RBPB infection from paddies in Yunnan Province, Zhejiang Province, and Chongqing Municipality during the 2025 growing season. Both serological platforms identified nine samples infected with B. glumae and five with B. plantarii, with samples six and eleven harboring both pathogens simultaneously. Every result matched conventional PCR exactly. In a separate test of six rice leaf samples from Zhejiang, the assays again agreed with PCR, correctly identifying one leaf co-infected with both bacteria. The ability to detect coinfections is particularly valuable, as simultaneous infection by B. glumae and B. gladioli is known to complicate disease control.</p>
<p>The implications extend beyond agronomy. B. glumae has been shown to pose a threat to human health: in 2007, researchers reported a case of chronic granulomatous disease in a child&#8217;s lungs caused by B. glumae, revealing the bacterium&#8217;s cross-species pathogenic potential. Reliable, rapid quarantine tools are therefore needed not only to protect rice yields but also to ensure the safe global circulation of certified pathogen-free rice seed. The authors note that further work remains, including testing how storage conditions affect assay performance, evaluating detection of coinfections at extremely low bacterial loads, and assessing the influence of operator subjectivity in visually reading results. Still, with four ultra-sensitive monoclonal antibodies and two field-ready platforms in hand, the study delivers practical instruments for epidemiological surveillance and quarantine inspection—tools that could help curb the international spread of two of rice&#8217;s most dangerous bacterial enemies.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Development of monoclonal antibody-based serological assays for detecting the rice bacterial panicle blight pathogens Burkholderia glumae and Burkholderia plantarii</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Highly specific and super-sensitive Dot-ELISA and colloidal gold immunochromatographic strips for the detection of Burkholderia glumae and Burkholderia plantarii of Rice bacterial panicle blight</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Dong, J., Mao, W., Zhang, C., Li, B., An, Z., Luo, J., &amp; Wu, J. (2026). Highly specific and super-sensitive Dot-ELISA and colloidal gold immunochromatographic strips for the detection of Burkholderia glumae and Burkholderia plantarii of Rice bacterial panicle blight. <em>Crop Health, 4</em>(1), Article 5. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44297-026-00067-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44297-026-00067-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44297-026-00067-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44297-026-00067-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> rice bacterial panicle blight, Burkholderia glumae, Burkholderia plantarii, monoclonal antibody, Dot-ELISA, colloidal gold immunochromatographic strip, plant disease diagnostics, PCR, quarantine, rice, serological detection, seed-borne pathogens</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">213679</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cities Supercharge Biological Invasions as Global Study Exposes Hidden Drivers</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/cities-supercharge-biological-invasions-as-global-study-exposes-hidden-drivers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Porter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2026 21:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alien vertebrate species spread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biodiversity Conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity decline due to invasions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological invasions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[city-specific invasion drivers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological consequences of urbanization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global invasive species study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global patterns of biological invasions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitat modification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of cities on biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive non-native species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invasive Species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive species management challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[island cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propagule pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quarantine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrestrial vertebrates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban ecosystem degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban environmental sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urbanization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urbanization and biological invasions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=202608</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A global analysis of 1,029 cities shows that urbanization itself, through habitat modification, warming and eroded native biodiversity, drives the establishment of non-native vertebrates.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cities have long been described as gateways for foreign species, but a sweeping new analysis suggests they do far more than simply open the door. A research team led by Zhining Wang and Xuan Liu of the Chinese Academy of Sciences reports in the journal Nature Cities that urbanization itself actively promotes biological invasions, independent of the sheer volume of trade and travel that funnels non-native animals into the world&#8217;s metropolitan areas. Drawing on records of 436 non-native terrestrial vertebrate species established across 1,029 cities worldwide, the study provides the most detailed picture to date of why some urban centers teem with alien birds, mammals, amphibians and reptiles while others host comparatively few.</p>
<p>The scale of the undertaking reflects the growing urgency of the problem. Biological invasions are now recognized as one of the leading challenges to global sustainability, contributing to biodiversity decline, substantial economic losses and the transmission of diseases. International assessments have repeatedly flagged the spread of invasive alien species as a primary driver of ecological degradation, yet the mechanisms that concentrate these species in particular cities have remained surprisingly poorly understood. Without that understanding, managers have struggled to design effective interventions. The new study set out to close that gap by assembling a global dataset linking where alien vertebrates have established populations with the environmental, economic and social characteristics of the cities they inhabit.</p>
<p>The resulting maps reveal a striking geographic asymmetry. Hotspots of urban biological invasion are concentrated mainly in developed countries, with island cities emerging as especially heavily invaded. Urban centers such as those in North America, Europe, Oceania and wealthy Asian island territories consistently show elevated richness of established non-native vertebrates. Yet when the researchers traced the native ranges of those same alien species, a different picture emerged: the overwhelming majority of the introduced animals originated in developing countries. Species are, in effect, being extracted from biodiversity-rich, less-developed regions and deposited in wealthy, highly urbanized ones, a pattern that echoes earlier findings on how colonial history and global trade routes continue to shape modern invasion flows.</p>
<p>This disparity between origins and destinations carries important practical implications. The trade in live animals, whether for pets, food, traditional medicine or religious release ceremonies, moves vast numbers of vertebrates out of source regions in the tropics and subtropics. Once those animals reach affluent cities with busy ports and airports, the probability that some individuals will escape or be deliberately released, and then survive and reproduce, rises sharply. Prior research has shown that the more individuals of a species are introduced to a location, the higher the colonization pressure and the greater the chance of establishment, a foundational principle of invasion ecology that the new analysis confirms at a global urban scale.</p>
<p>Crucially, however, the study shows that propagule pressure alone cannot explain the distribution of alien vertebrates across cities. After statistically accounting for the physical area of each city and for uneven sampling effort, the researchers found that cities with more non-native species tended to share three characteristics indicative of greater urbanization: higher levels of habitat modification, warmer temperatures and lower native biodiversity. In other words, once an alien animal arrives in a city, whether it manages to establish a self-sustaining population depends heavily on how thoroughly that city has been transformed by human activity.</p>
<p>Each of these three factors points to a distinct biological mechanism. Habitat modification, measured through indices of human alteration of terrestrial systems, fragments natural landscapes, degrades the ecosystems that native species depend on and creates the kind of disturbed, simplified environments in which many generalist invaders thrive. Roads, construction and continuous expansion of the built footprint open dispersal corridors for adaptable species while removing the ecological barriers that once kept them in check. Previous work has documented how cane toads exploit roads as dispersal highways and how urban sprawl facilitates the spread of exotic plants across multiple spatial scales, and the new vertebrate analysis suggests similar dynamics operate in cities everywhere.</p>
<p>Warmer temperatures add a second layer of opportunity. The urban heat island effect raises temperatures within cities relative to surrounding countryside, and the analysis found that cities with warmer climates harbor more non-native vertebrates. Many of the alien species now established in temperate cities originated in warmer native ranges, so heat-retreating urban environments effectively pre-adapt those species for survival far beyond their historical climatic limits. Studies of ectotherms such as lizards have shown that thermal spikes from urban heat islands can radically alter habitat suitability, and a recent global meta-analysis by members of the same team found that non-native animals are generally less sensitive to extreme weather than their native counterparts. Cities thus warm the stage and recruit performers already primed for the conditions.</p>
<p>The third factor, reduced native biodiversity, connects the invasion story to one of ecology&#8217;s oldest debates. Eroded native communities can leave functional gaps that invaders fill, weaken the biotic resistance that intact ecosystems mount against newcomers, and signal that a city&#8217;s environment has already been pushed past thresholds of disturbance. Prior global analyses have shown that native diversity buffers ecosystems against the severity of non-native tree invasions, and the new study extends that principle to urban vertebrates. Biotic homogenization, the process by which urbanization replaces distinctive local assemblages with a cosmopolitan set of hardy winners, appears to feed on itself: as native species vanish, cities become easier to invade, and as invasions proceed, native species come under further pressure.</p>
<p>The authors emphasize that these findings translate directly into management priorities. Because invasion risk rises with habitat modification, reducing anthropogenic disturbance to natural habitats within and around cities should curb the establishment of new alien populations. Because degraded native communities offer less resistance, conserving and restoring native species in urban areas strengthens ecological defenses. And because the flow of species from developing source regions into wealthy destination cities persists, strengthening quarantine measures along trade and transport pathways remains essential for intercepting introductions before they begin. None of these measures is a substitute for the others; the study&#8217;s central message is that invasion risk is generated at multiple points in the introduction-establishment-spread continuum, and effective control requires intervention at each of them.</p>
<p>The implications reach well beyond city limits. Cities do not merely accumulate alien species; they act as bridgeheads from which invaders can radiate into surrounding landscapes, and modeling work has shown that complex landscape geometry and stepping-stone dispersal can dramatically accelerate spread. With more than half of humanity now living in urban areas and urban land cover expanding rapidly, the number of invasion platform cities will only grow. Projections of alien species accumulation through 2050 suggest no saturation in the global rate of new establishments, meaning the problem will intensify without deliberate policy action. By disentangling propagule pressure from the ecological conditions that convert arrivals into populations, this global analysis of more than a thousand cities gives policymakers a clearer roadmap: slow the flow of species across borders, protect and restore the natural fabric of urban ecosystems, and treat thriving native biodiversity not as an amenity but as a critical line of defense against one of the defining environmental challenges of the century.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Drivers of non-native terrestrial vertebrate establishment in cities worldwide</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Urbanization promotes biological invasions in global cities</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Du, Y., Gu, S., Li, W., Tu, W., &amp; Liu, X. (2026). Urbanization promotes biological invasions in global cities. <em>Nature Cities</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-026-00517-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-026-00517-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44284-026-00517-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s44284-026-00517-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> biological invasions, urbanization, invasive species, urban ecology, biodiversity, terrestrial vertebrates, propagule pressure, island cities, habitat modification, quarantine, biodiversity conservation, Nature Cities</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">202608</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
