The study involved interviews with 10 lodge management personnel and owners, supplemented by field observations. It focused on selected private lodges within a sensitive ecosystem, rather than the whole of Kruger National Park or South Africa’s tourism industry. Its purpose was to explore how participating properties were translating sustainability commitments into practice. The design provides qualitative evidence about reported initiatives and observed approaches, but it does not quantify reductions in environmental impacts, establish causal effects or determine how ESG adoption compares across all private lodges in the park.

Results indicated that the extent of ESG adoption varied among the lodges studied. Some properties had incorporated more sustainability practices than others, demonstrating that environmental governance was not being implemented uniformly across this group of private accommodation. The researchers also identified compliance and resource efficiency as important considerations. Efficient resource use was linked in the study to the sustainability of lodge operations and to tourist satisfaction, although the research did not measure the size of either environmental benefits or effects on visitors.

The lodges’ responses to climate change formed another prominent part of their sustainability work. Alongside broader environmental, social and governance commitments, participating properties emphasized saving water and using energy efficiently. The supplied research evidence does not specify individual certification systems, numerical resource-reduction targets, monitoring indicators, greenhouse-gas measurements or the performance of particular technologies. It therefore supports identifying the priorities recognized by participants, but not comparing the effectiveness of specific interventions.

Lodge operators nevertheless reported practical constraints in pursuing sustainability goals. The capital cost of some sustainability technologies was a challenge, and attitudes among tourism role players also created difficulties for implementation. The study does not establish how these factors affected adoption quantitatively or whether the findings represent every lodge in Kruger National Park. Based on the interview and observational evidence, the researchers developed a sustainability framework intended for private lodges operating in sensitive ecosystems, but the extent to which that framework was tested and its measurable effects were not reported in the study summary.

Overall, the research portrays selected private Kruger lodges as active but uneven implementers of sustainability standards. Water conservation, energy efficiency, climate-related action and resource management were prominent priorities, while investment costs and the attitudes of tourism role players were identified as challenges. The authors recommend further research into how the knowledge and behaviour of tourists and employees shape sustainability in private game lodges. That proposed work would examine an area not resolved by the present study, which was limited in scope and relied on interviews with 10 owners or managers together with field observations.

Subject of Research: Environmental, social and governance adoption in selected private game lodges in Kruger National Park

Article Title: Environmental sustainability governance and other sustainability standards at selected private lodgings in national parks

Article References: Dube, K., & Osundiran, A. O. (2026). Environmental sustainability governance and other sustainability standards at selected private lodgings in national parks. Discover Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-04722-4

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1007/s43621-026-04722-4

Keywords: ESG adoption, private game lodges, Kruger National Park, sustainable tourism, water efficiency, energy efficiency, climate governance, environmental management, lodgement sustainability, Environmental, sustainability, governance