<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>proton exchange membranes &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/proton-exchange-membranes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 15:42:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Methanol fuel cells edge closer to the mainstream as catalysts and membranes improve</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/methanol-fuel-cells-edge-closer-to-the-mainstream-as-catalysts-and-membranes-improve/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faith Mcneil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 15:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anion exchange membranes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomass-derived fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon capture and utilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catalyst advancements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[challenges in fuel cell efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clean energy carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Decarbonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct methanol fuel cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrocatalysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrochemical energy conversion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrolyte membrane improvements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of methanol fuel cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fuel cell commercialization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanol crossover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methanol fuel cell technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanol fuel cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanol reaction mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[platinum catalysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[portable power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proton exchange membranes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable energy storage solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable methanol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable power generation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=228427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A sweeping new review finds that advances in catalysts, membranes and system design are steadily overcoming the efficiency and cost barriers that have long kept methanol fuel cells on the sidelines of the clean-energy transition.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A liquid fuel that can be poured, stored and shipped at ambient conditions, produced from biomass or even captured carbon dioxide, and converted directly into electricity with water and carbon dioxide as the only by-products: for decades, that vision has made methanol one of the most tantalizing energy carriers in the clean-technology portfolio. A comprehensive new review published in Discover Electrochemistry by Alexander Ikeuba of the University of Calabar and colleagues takes stock of where methanol fuel cell technology actually stands, and the picture is one of genuine progress shadowed by stubborn, well-defined obstacles.</p>
<p>The principle behind a methanol fuel cell is elegantly simple. At the anode, methanol reacts with water to yield carbon dioxide, six protons and six electrons; the protons migrate through an electrolyte membrane while the electrons travel around an external circuit, generating usable current before recombining with oxygen at the cathode to form water. The overall reaction, two molecules of methanol plus three of oxygen yielding two of carbon dioxide and four of water, carries a theoretical cell voltage of 1.21 volts and a theoretical efficiency approaching 97 percent. In practice, real devices fall far short of that ceiling, and the review is candid about why: high overpotentials at both electrodes, ohmic resistance, and above all the leakage of unreacted methanol across the membrane, a phenomenon known as methanol crossover.</p>
<p>Crossover is the technology&#8217;s defining nemesis. When methanol permeates from anode to cathode, it reacts directly with oxygen there, creating a mixed potential that depresses the cell voltage, wastes fuel, and poisons the platinum catalyst on the cathode side. The review highlights work by Seo and Lee showing that crossover worsens with rising cell temperature, methanol concentration and flow rate, while increasing cathode backpressure suppresses it. Membrane thickness matters too, with thicker membranes reducing permeation at the cost of higher ionic resistance. Mitigation strategies now span novel membrane chemistries, including polyvinyl alcohol composites with sulfonated additives, and methanol-tolerant oxygen reduction catalysts that blunt the cathode penalty when some crossover is unavoidable.</p>
<p>Catalyst innovation is where some of the most striking advances are happening. Platinum-ruthenium alloys remain the anode workhorse, exploiting a bifunctional mechanism in which ruthenium supplies oxygen-containing species that strip carbon monoxide intermediates from platinum sites, while also electronically modifying the platinum to weaken CO binding. Comparative studies show platinum-tin outperforming platinum-ruthenium because tin delivers oxygen species more effectively. On multi-walled carbon nanotube supports, platinum-iridium catalysts have demonstrated enhanced activity and durability. Meanwhile, non-platinum-group alternatives, including palladium systems, transition-metal carbides such as tungsten and molybdenum carbides, and nitrogen-doped carbons, are showing appreciable methanol oxidation activity, particularly in alkaline conditions where the oxygen reduction reaction is intrinsically faster and cheaper catalysts suffice.</p>
<p>That alkaline pathway deserves particular attention. Alkaline methanol fuel cells use anion exchange membranes or liquid alkaline electrolytes, conducting hydroxide ions rather than protons. In that environment, palladium, nickel and silver can replace expensive platinum, and methanol oxidation follows different intermediate pathways that reduce carbon monoxide poisoning. Recent advances in anion exchange membrane chemistry, notably polybenzimidazole and quaternary ammonium-functionalised polymers, have improved hydroxide conductivity and chemical stability, positioning alkaline direct methanol fuel cells as a viable low-cost alternative for portable and stationary power, though carbonate precipitation and membrane degradation remain open problems.</p>
<p>Beyond materials, the review catalogues clever system-level engineering. Novel anode designs with uneven catalyst loading along the methanol flow direction match conventional performance while using less platinum. Catalyst-coated membrane fabrication methods reduce ohmic resistance compared with catalyst-coated substrates. Microfluidic fuel cells, in which methanol and oxidant streams flow in laminar contact without a membrane at all, have reached power densities of 90 milliwatts per square centimetre in viscous co-flow configurations, and paper-based vapor-fed variants have run LEDs for 28 hours. Even artificial intelligence has entered the field: a recent Nature Energy study demonstrated reinforcement-learning control algorithms that dynamically optimise power output while mitigating catalyst degradation in real time.</p>
<p>The environmental case rests heavily on how the methanol is made. Lifecycle analyses cited in the review indicate that renewable methanol, produced from biomass or from captured carbon dioxide and green hydrogen, can cut well-to-wheel carbon dioxide emissions by up to 95 percent compared with fossil fuels, though the upper figure assumes nearly fully renewable electricity across the production chain. Biomethanol combustion alone can reduce nitrogen oxide emissions by up to 80 percent and virtually eliminate sulfur oxides. Even methanol derived from natural gas offers some benefit when used in fuel cells, simply because electrochemical conversion is more efficient than combustion.</p>
<p>Commercially, the sector is small but growing fast. Market analyses put the direct methanol fuel cell market at roughly 3.25 to 3.4 billion US dollars in 2024, with projected compound annual growth of 11 to 15 percent through the mid-2030s. Asia Pacific holds about 35 percent of the market, anchored by government support in China, Japan and South Korea, while North America is expected to grow fastest. Companies from SFC Energy to Blue World Technologies are investing in portable, off-grid and automotive applications, and demonstrated products range from Toshiba&#8217;s Dynario phone charger to hybrid reformed-methanol systems backing up telecom towers.</p>
<p>The applications map is remarkably broad. Direct methanol fuel cells power laptops, cameras and soldiers&#8217; field equipment, where their low noise and thermal signature are decisive advantages. Reformed variants, which strip methanol into hydrogen before conversion, achieve higher efficiencies and suit stationary generators. Marine propulsion is emerging as a major opportunity because methanol, unlike hydrogen, is liquid at ambient temperature and helps shipowners meet International Maritime Organization emission rules. Drones benefit from methanol&#8217;s energy density for extended flight times, while hospitals, data centers, remote farms and mining operations are all exploring methanol fuel cells as cleaner replacements for diesel generators.</p>
<p>What stands between promise and ubiquity is cost and longevity. Platinum remains scarce and expensive, proton exchange membranes are costly to manufacture, and renewable methanol production still demands heavy upfront investment. The review&#8217;s techno-economic assessment places the levelized cost of electricity from direct methanol fuel cell systems at 0.10 to 0.15 dollars per kilowatt-hour under realistic assumptions, with stack costs needing to fall below 500 dollars per kilowatt for broad competitiveness. Methanol&#8217;s toxicity and flammability add regulatory burden. Yet the authors&#8217; conclusion is measured optimism: with durable non-platinum catalysts, composite membranes combining high conductivity with near-zero crossover, smart thermal and water management, and supportive policy for green methanol supply chains, methanol fuel cells are well positioned to become a flexible, scalable component of the global clean-energy portfolio.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Recent advances, challenges and future prospects of methanol fuel cell technologies</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Recent advances and future prospects in methanol fuel cell technologies</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ikeuba, A. I., Sonde, C. U., Njoku, C. N., Essiet, N., Udourioh, G. A., Usibe, B. E., Obika, I. C., Obono, O. E., &amp; Ebenso, E. E. (2026). Recent advances and future prospects in methanol fuel cell technologies. <em>Discover Electrochemistry, 3</em>(1), Article 45. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44373-026-00132-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44373-026-00132-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44373-026-00132-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44373-026-00132-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> methanol fuel cells, direct methanol fuel cells, electrocatalysts, proton exchange membranes, methanol crossover, anion exchange membranes, renewable methanol, clean energy, fuel cell commercialization, platinum catalysts, portable power, decarbonization</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">228427</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Advancements in High-Performance Proton Exchange Membranes Enhance Electrochemical LOHC Hydrogen Storage</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/advancements-in-high-performance-proton-exchange-membranes-enhance-electrochemical-lohc-hydrogen-storage/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 05:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advancements in membrane technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conventional hydrogen storage methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrochemical hydrogen storage systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-performance hydrogen storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen transport safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KRICT and Yonsei University collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquid organic hydrogen carriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[operational efficiency challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proton exchange membranes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SPAES membrane technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toluene permeability reduction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/advancements-in-high-performance-proton-exchange-membranes-enhance-electrochemical-lohc-hydrogen-storage/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A groundbreaking advancement in the field of proton exchange membranes (PEMs) has emerged from a collaborative research initiative between Dr. Soonyong So from the Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KRICT) and Professor Sang-Young Lee from Yonsei University. This new membrane technology, designed to optimize electrochemical hydrogen storage systems, utilizes a hydrocarbon-based polymer known as [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A groundbreaking advancement in the field of proton exchange membranes (PEMs) has emerged from a collaborative research initiative between Dr. Soonyong So from the Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KRICT) and Professor Sang-Young Lee from Yonsei University. This new membrane technology, designed to optimize electrochemical hydrogen storage systems, utilizes a hydrocarbon-based polymer known as sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone) or SPAES. The SPAES membrane boasts an impressive performance enhancement when compared to traditional membranes like Nafion, a commonly utilized perfluorinated PEM. </p>
<p>One of the significant innovations introduced with the SPAES membrane is its ability to drastically reduce toluene permeability. This is particularly critical, as liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHCs) such as toluene are increasingly recognized as viable mediums for safely storing and transporting hydrogen. Conventional methods of hydrogen storage, which involve high pressures of over 100 bar or extreme low temperatures of -252.9 °C, pose several handling and safety challenges. In contrast, LOHCs provide a much more manageable alternative since they can be stored and transported under milder conditions.</p>
<p>However, the use of LOHCs presents challenges, particularly regarding the unwanted crossover of toluene molecules through the membrane in electrochemical hydrogenation systems. This crossover significantly undermines operational efficiency. Moreover, it has the potential to contaminate the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalyst present on the anode side, which can lead to detrimental impacts on the overall system performance. Addressing this issue was crucial for the success of the new membrane technology.</p>
<p>In their research, the team at KRICT developed the new SPAES membrane with particularly narrow hydrophilic domains, measuring approximately 2.1 nm in width. These channels serve as dedicated proton pathways within the membrane and are designed to reduce toluene permeability significantly. The innovative structure of the SPAES membrane facilitates the exclusion of toluene while promoting efficient proton transport, which is critical for achieving high performance in electrochemical processes. The outcome is a remarkable reduction in toluene crossover, decreased by more than 60% when compared to Nafion.</p>
<p>Moreover, the introduction of the SPAES membrane led to a considerable increase in the Faradaic efficiency of the hydrogenation process, raising it from 68.4% with Nafion to an impressive 72.8% with the new membrane. This enhanced efficiency represents a major leap forward in the functionality of PEMs, setting the stage for improved performance of hydrogen storage systems. Additionally, during long-term operational tests lasting 48 hours, the voltage degradation rate was also reduced significantly by 40%, demonstrating not only the enhanced performance but also the robust stability of the SPAES membrane over extended use.</p>
<p>The potential applications for this revolutionary technology extend far beyond academic curiosity, as the researchers envision its integration into practical setups for hydrogen storage and energy production. They foresee standalone, high-efficiency electrochemical hydrogen storage systems reaching commercialization by 2030. This advancement could lead to substantial developments in eco-friendly energy solutions, particularly relevant for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles and hydrogen power generation initiatives.</p>
<p>KRICT&#8217;s President, Youngkook Lee, expressed optimism regarding the widespread applicability of the SPAES membrane technology within the realm of sustainable energy systems. He noted that this innovation could significantly contribute to the hydrogen economy and help overcome existing performance bottlenecks associated with membrane technologies currently in use for electrochemical hydrogen storage applications. </p>
<p>The collaborative research led by Dr. So and Professor Lee also aligns with KRICT&#8217;s dedication to advancing chemical technologies for broader societal benefits. As an institute founded in 1976, KRICT has been at the forefront of research in various scientific fields, including chemistry, material science, and environmental science. Their ongoing commitment emphasizes the importance of developing solutions that address critical global challenges related to energy production and sustainability, an imperative that continues to gain urgency in today&#8217;s world.</p>
<p>The findings from this research were published in the highly-regarded Journal of Materials Chemistry A, which boasts an impressive impact factor of 10.7. The publication marks a significant milestone in the academic discourse surrounding membrane technology and highlights the promising future of electrochemical hydrogen storage systems fueled by innovative research and development.</p>
<p>This critical work in membrane technology represents a strategic alignment of fundamental research and applied science, demonstrating that advancements in materials science can lead to practical solutions that bolster the transition to a hydrogen-powered future. It is a clear testament to the potential of scientific research to drive progress in energy technologies, harboring hope for sustainable energy solutions that will play a crucial role in achieving global climate goals. </p>
<p>Through continuous research and collaboration, such innovations pave the way for not just technical progress but also for broader systemic changes in how society approaches energy use and sustainability. Ultimately, the development of more efficient, cost-effective, and stable hydrogen storage systems is poised to catalyze the next phase of the energy transition, moving toward a cleaner, more efficient, and environmentally conscious future.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>: Development of a new proton exchange membrane (PEM) for electrochemical hydrogen storage systems<br />
<strong>Article Title</strong>: An efficient toluene barrier membrane for high-performance direct toluene hydrogenation via an electrochemical process<br />
<strong>News Publication Date</strong>: February 14, 2025<br />
<strong>Web References</strong>: http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/D4TA06773H<br />
<strong>References</strong>: Journal of Materials Chemistry A (IF 10.7)<br />
<strong>Image Credits</strong>: Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology (KRICT)  </p>
<h4><strong>Keywords</strong></h4>
<p> Proton exchange membranes, electrochemical hydrogen storage, sulfonated poly(arylene ether sulfone), SPAES membrane, liquid organic hydrogen carriers, Faradaic efficiency, hydrogen economy, KRICT, sustainable energy solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">42778</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
