<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>protein interaction prediction &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/protein-interaction-prediction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 18:30:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Pooled AlphaFold3 screening maps a bacterium&#8217;s protein interactions 100 times faster</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/pooled-alphafold3-screening-maps-a-bacteriums-protein-interactions-100-times-faster/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 18:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advances in molecular interaction catalogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI-driven molecular biology techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlphaFold3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AlphaFold3 protein complex modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational screening of bacterial protein interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning in protein complex prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-throughput protein interaction detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interactome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large-scale proteome analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Molecular Systems Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiple sequence alignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mycoplasma genitalium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mycoplasma genitalium proteome study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein complexes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein interaction prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein-protein interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proteome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proteome-wide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapid protein interaction screening methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structural biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structure prediction in systems biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structure-based protein interaction mapping]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=231306</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have devised a pooled AlphaFold3 screening strategy that cuts the number of computational jobs needed to map an entire bacterial protein interaction network 100-fold while improving accuracy.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most stubborn problems in molecular biology is producing a complete and accurate catalogue of the protein interactions that keep an organism alive. Every protein in a cell can, in principle, touch many others, and knowing which of those touches actually happen is the foundation for understanding everything from metabolism to infection. A new study by Todor and colleagues, published in Molecular Systems Biology, has introduced a clever computational strategy that makes this task dramatically more tractable, screening all protein interactions in the bacterium Mycoplasma genitalium using AlphaFold3, the latest generation of Google DeepMind&#8217;s celebrated structure-prediction system.</p>
<p>The core insight behind the approach is disarmingly simple. AlphaFold3 can model the structure of protein complexes, and researchers have increasingly used it to test whether two proteins that have never been shown to interact might nevertheless form a physical pair. The obvious way to apply this to an entire organism is to run the algorithm on every possible pair of proteins one at a time. But the arithmetic quickly becomes brutal. The number of possible pairwise interactions scales quadratically with the size of the proteome, so even a modest bacterium generates tens of thousands of candidate pairs, while the human proteome, with roughly 20,000 proteins, yields around 200 million. Running that many individual AlphaFold jobs is, as the authors of the accompanying commentary note, computationally intractable with realistic resources.</p>
<p>Todor and colleagues sidestepped the problem by refusing to play the game one pair at a time. Instead of enumerating every possible interaction, they grouped proteins into random pools, generally containing between 10 and 25 proteins, and submitted each pool to AlphaFold3&#8217;s free online server as a single job. Because AlphaFold3 models all proteins in an input simultaneously, each pooled run produces an all-versus-all comparison within that pool. The pools were designed so that every pair of proteins in the proteome appears together in at least one pool, guaranteeing that the full set of pairwise interactions gets modeled once all the pools have been processed. The logic that makes this work is that true interactions are rare: out of the vast number of possible pairs, only a small fraction are real, so the extra proteins packed into a pool are unlikely to interfere with the evaluation of genuine interactions.</p>
<p>The efficiency gains are striking. Compared with the traditional pairwise approach, pooling reduced the total number of AlphaFold jobs by 100-fold and improved the runtime by twofold. More surprisingly, the pooled approach also improved the overall accuracy of identifying true interactions. For a set of seven proteins, the enumerated pairwise strategy would require 21 separate AlphaFold runs, while the pooling strategy accomplishes the same coverage in just three. In a field where compute budgets routinely dictate the scope of a study, a method that is simultaneously cheaper, faster, and more accurate is a rare and welcome combination.</p>
<p>The organism chosen for the demonstration, Mycoplasma genitalium, is a free-living bacterium with one of the smallest known genomes, containing roughly 475 proteins and therefore 113,050 possible pairwise interactions. That scale is manageable enough to serve as a proof of principle, but it also highlights the limits of the current achievement. The human proteome&#8217;s roughly 200 million possible pairs remain far beyond what pooling alone can conquer. Other research groups have attacked the scaling problem from a different direction, prioritizing pairs of proteins that are most likely to interact based on independent evidence. Burke and colleagues, for example, produced AlphaFold2 models of confident protein pairs drawn from publicly available human protein interaction databases such as hu.MAP 2.0 and HuRI, while other teams have applied related strategies to core eukaryotic complexes and to systematic human interactome computations.</p>
<p>Prioritization, however, has an inherent dependency: it requires experimental interaction data to exist for the species being studied, or at least for a close relative. Non-model organisms, which include most of the bacterial and archaeal diversity on the planet, often lack such data entirely. This is precisely where the pooling approach shines, since it needs no prior knowledge to get started. Importantly, the two strategies are not in conflict. When experimental data are available, pooling and prioritization could in principle be combined in future efforts, using evidence-based filters to narrow the candidate space and pooled AlphaFold3 screening to evaluate what remains. For understudied organisms, pooling stands as a valuable new addition to the computational toolkit.</p>
<p>Why pooling improves accuracy remains an open question, and the authors have offered several hypotheses. One appealing idea involves competition among interactions. Because the pooled approach evaluates many potential interactions simultaneously, only the most confident interaction at any given protein interface will be selected in the final model. This competitive filtering could suppress false positives, particularly for promiscuous proteins that have a tendency to produce spurious predictions when considered in isolation. A deeper understanding of the mechanism behind the accuracy boost would be more than an academic curiosity; it would allow researchers to engineer protein pools deliberately, optimizing their composition to maximize predictive performance rather than relying on random assignment.</p>
<p>That same hypothesis, however, exposes a potential weakness. If AlphaFold3 prioritizes some interactions based on spatial constraints, then mutually exclusive interactions, in which two different proteins bind a third protein at the same interface, may cause one partner to be systematically favored over the other. Such exclusivity is common in nature and often underlies molecular functions that switch depending on cellular context. The severity of the problem depends on how many mutually exclusive interactions exist and on the size of the pools. With the current setup of 10 to 25 proteins per pool, the issue is likely to be rare, but if completeness becomes the explicit goal, or if pool sizes are increased to gain further efficiency, it will need to be addressed head-on.</p>
<p>There are also limitations inherited from AlphaFold3 itself. The algorithm depends on multiple sequence alignments to identify co-evolving pairs of amino acids, both within a single protein and between proteins in a complex, and it uses those co-evolutionary signals as distance constraints when building structural models. Proteins without sufficiently deep alignments suffer greatly in accuracy. In Mycoplasma genitalium, around 40 proteins, roughly 8 percent of the proteome, have limited sequence homology and appear to be found only in this species. As a result, nearly 18,000 protein pairs cannot be evaluated by this approach at all. That gap is more than a technical footnote, because species-specific proteins and their interactions may be responsible for the unique biology of the organism. Context-dependent interactions, such as those that form only under particular cellular conditions or in specific cell types, are similarly difficult for the method to discern.</p>
<p>Looking ahead, pooled screening offers an intriguing path toward detecting higher-order interactions, such as trimers and tetramers, which are often more biologically relevant than simple pairwise contacts. The obstacle is probabilistic: purely random pools make it unlikely that three or more proteins that genuinely interact in the cell will land in the same pool. Capturing all pairwise interactions through pooling is likely to be effective, but exhaustively screening all possible three-way combinations, roughly 18 million in Mycoplasma genitalium alone, will remain out of reach for quite a while unless pools are chosen intelligently rather than at random. Even so, the trajectory is clear. Todor and colleagues have brought the field measurably closer to the long-sought goal of complete, all-versus-all computational screening of protein interaction landscapes, for model organisms and neglected ones alike. The efficiency gains and the unexpected accuracy boost suggest that pooled AlphaFold screening will become an indispensable tool in a toolkit that is expanding at a remarkable pace.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Proteome-wide prediction of protein-protein interactions using pooled AlphaFold3 screening</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Proteome-wide AlphaFold pool party</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Drew, K. (2026). Proteome-wide AlphaFold pool party. <em>Molecular Systems Biology, 22</em>(4), 477-479. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44320-026-00198-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s44320-026-00198-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44320-026-00198-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s44320-026-00198-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> AlphaFold3, protein-protein interactions, Mycoplasma genitalium, structural biology, computational biology, proteome, deep learning, protein complexes, interactome, multiple sequence alignment, molecular systems biology, Proteome-wide</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">231306</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Genomic Database PeuDB Aims to Decode the Medicinal Chemistry of a Classic Chinese Herb</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-genomic-database-peudb-aims-to-decode-the-medicinal-chemistry-of-a-classic-chinese-herb/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 17:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biosynthesis of pharmacologically active plant compounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-expression network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coumarin and flavonoid gene pathways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coumarin biosynthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cytochrome P450]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene annotation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic regulation of herbal medicine constituents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genomic platform for medicinal herbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guizhou University medicinal plant research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herbal medicine gene-function analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicinal plant genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicinal plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-access plant genomics database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peucedanum praeruptorum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peucedanum praeruptorum genome database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PeuDB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant secondary metabolite biosynthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein interaction prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telomere-to-telomere assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traditional Chinese medicine genomic resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcriptomic data in traditional medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcriptomics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=231154</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have launched PeuDB, an integrated genomic and transcriptomic database that pairs dual reference genome assemblies with 135 RNA-seq samples to accelerate gene-function discovery and coumarin biosynthesis research in the medicinal herb Peucedanum praeruptorum.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A traditional Chinese medicinal herb that has been prescribed for centuries to treat coughs, asthma, and inflammatory conditions is finally getting the genomic attention it deserves. Researchers at Guizhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine have unveiled PeuDB, a comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic platform for Peucedanum praeruptorum Dunn, a plant better known in Chinese medicine as Qianhu. The resource, described in an open-access paper in BMC Genomics, integrates two independently annotated reference genome assemblies with expression data from 135 independent biological samples spanning nine separate BioProjects, creating what the team describes as a one-stop platform for gene-function analysis in a species whose pharmacologically active compounds have long outpaced our understanding of how they are actually made.</p>
<p>The significance of the work lies in the gap it addresses. The roots of P. praeruptorum are rich in coumarins and flavonoids, two classes of plant secondary metabolites with well-documented pharmacological activity, yet the genetic basis underlying the biosynthesis of these compounds has remained insufficiently characterized. For medicinal plant researchers, that is a familiar frustration: the chemistry is known, the clinical tradition is deep, but the genes and regulatory networks controlling production of the active ingredients stay hidden. PeuDB is designed to change that by giving scientists the tools to move from a compound of interest to candidate genes, and from candidate genes to testable hypotheses about biosynthetic pathways.</p>
<p>Technically, the platform is built on a dual-assembly foundation that reflects the current reality of plant genomics. It incorporates the PP_2024v2 telomere-to-telomere assembly, representing the most complete end-to-end reconstruction of the plant&#8217;s chromosomes, alongside the PP_2024v1 chromosome-level assembly generated independently. Maintaining both assemblies side by side is a deliberate choice rather than redundancy. Different research groups have already deposited data mapped against different references, and by supporting both, the database allows users to work within whichever coordinate system their data or collaborators use. To make this practical, PeuDB links 24,846 accepted cross-assembly gene pairs, enabling identifier conversion so that a gene discovered in one assembly can be traced to its counterpart in the other.</p>
<p>Functional annotation of predicted genes was carried out against a battery of established reference databases, including NR, Swiss-Prot, TAIR10, TrEMBL, GO, KEGG, and Pfam. This layered annotation strategy means users can query a gene and retrieve not only its likely protein family but also its predicted molecular function, biological process, cellular component, and the metabolic pathways it may participate in. The scale of the classification effort is substantial: the team catalogued six major gene-family categories, comprising 5,981 transcription factors and transcriptional regulators, 2,916 protein kinases, 1,940 carbohydrate-active enzymes, 1,879 transporters, 3,112 ubiquitin-related proteins, and 594 cytochrome P450 genes. That last number is particularly noteworthy for natural-products research, since cytochrome P450 enzymes are the workhorses of plant secondary metabolism and frequently catalyze the tailoring steps that give medicinal compounds their final, bioactive structures.</p>
<p>The transcriptomic component of the database required careful statistical treatment before it could support reliable conclusions. Expression data from nine BioProjects inevitably carry batch effects, systematic technical differences between sequencing runs, laboratories, and library preparations that can masquerade as biology. The researchers applied tissue-stratified batch correction using mean-only parametric ComBat, applied separately within root, leaf, and stem tissues, with BioProject as the batch variable and estimable within-project biological-condition contrasts built into the model. Tissues that appeared in only a single BioProject, namely callus and flower, were passed through unchanged. Principal component analysis diagnostics before and after correction showed a substantial reduction, though not complete elimination, of measurable project-associated variation, a level of transparency that the authors document in their supplementary tables rather than glossing over.</p>
<p>With corrected expression profiles in hand, the team constructed co-expression networks using two complementary filtering approaches: direct Pearson-correlation and mutual-rank filtering. The baseline thresholds, a Pearson correlation coefficient above 0.70 combined with a mutual rank below 30, identified 427,999 positive co-expression relationships, of which 255,633 belong to the PP_2024v2 assembly and 172,366 to PP_2024v1. Importantly, the researchers did not treat these thresholds as sacred. A sensitivity analysis evaluated all nine combinations of strict correlation cutoffs from 0.65 to 0.75 and mutual-rank cutoffs from 20 to 40, quantifying how network size and overlap respond to parameter choices. This kind of threshold-sensitivity reporting is increasingly seen as a hallmark of rigorous network biology, since it tells downstream users exactly how much confidence to place in any individual predicted relationship.</p>
<p>Beyond co-expression, PeuDB extends into protein-interaction prediction through a strategy borrowed from comparative genomics. The team projected evidence-filtered Arabidopsis interaction data onto P. praeruptorum using strict reciprocal-best-hit analysis, yielding 5,864 confidence-filtered interolog predictions, split as 3,027 for the T2T assembly and 2,837 for the chromosome-level assembly. The logic is that if two proteins are known to interact in the well-studied reference plant Arabidopsis thaliana, and their best-matching counterparts in P. praeruptorum are each other&#8217;s best matches in turn, the interaction is likely conserved. It is an inference, not a measurement, and the database is explicit about that distinction, presenting these predictions as computational hypotheses awaiting experimental validation.</p>
<p>To demonstrate the platform in action, the authors built two reproducible case-study workflows, one centered on the F6&#8217;H enzyme family and another on WRKY transcription factors. Both are directly relevant to the plant&#8217;s medicinal value: feruloyl 6-hydroxylase enzymes participate in coumarin biosynthesis, while WRKY transcription factors are candidate regulators of secondary-metabolite pathways. The case studies walk users through candidate prioritization while carefully distinguishing what the computational evidence supports from what still requires laboratory confirmation. Notably, the WRKY analysis showed that biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids remained significantly enriched across all nine threshold combinations tested, while other baseline-significant pathways and individual network edges proved threshold-dependent, a finding the authors report honestly rather than burying.</p>
<p>The platform itself runs on a LAMP architecture, the long-established combination of Linux, Apache, MySQL, and PHP, and offers a user-friendly web interface with an unusually complete analytical toolkit. Users can perform BLAST searches, browse genomes with JBrowse2, generate expression heatmaps, explore co-expression and predicted protein-interaction networks, run enrichment and differential-expression analyses, design primers, convert identifiers between assemblies, and conduct multiple-sequence alignments. For programmatic users, PeuDB provides a versioned, read-only REST API with OpenAPI/Swagger documentation, enabling automated retrieval of assembly information, gene annotations and sequences, raw TPM expression profiles, cross-assembly mappings, co-expression relationships, and predicted protein interactions. That API layer matters for reproducibility, allowing pipelines to query the database directly rather than relying on manual downloads that quickly go stale.</p>
<p>PeuDB is freely accessible at https://www.gzybioinformatics.cn/PeuDB, and its arrival reflects a broader shift in how medicinal plant science is done. The era in which a single reference genome and a handful of transcriptomes could anchor a research program is giving way to integrated platforms that manage multiple assemblies, large sample collections, and the statistical corrections needed to make heterogeneous public data usable. For P. praeruptorum, the practical payoff could be faster identification of the genes governing coumarin and flavonoid production, with implications for breeding, cultivation, and potentially metabolic engineering of a herb whose therapeutic reputation spans centuries. For the wider community of researchers working on under-characterized medicinal species, the database offers a template: assemble thoroughly, annotate broadly, correct for batch effects rigorously, report threshold sensitivity honestly, and always keep the line between computational prediction and experimental proof clearly visible.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> A genomic and transcriptomic database for gene-function and coumarin biosynthesis analysis in the medicinal plant Peucedanum praeruptorum</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> PeuDB: a comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic platform for gene function analysis in Peucedanum praeruptorum</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Yang, J., Yang, H., Shu, G., Xiao, Q., &amp; Yang, J. (2026). PeuDB: a comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic platform for gene function analysis in Peucedanum praeruptorum. <em>BMC Genomics</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-026-13302-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-026-13302-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-026-13302-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s12864-026-13302-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Peucedanum praeruptorum, PeuDB, genomics, transcriptomics, co-expression network, coumarin biosynthesis, cytochrome P450, telomere-to-telomere assembly, gene annotation, protein interaction prediction, medicinal plants, biological database</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">231154</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
