<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>prioritization of protein targets for disc disorder research &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/prioritization-of-protein-targets-for-disc-disorder-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:31:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Genetic screening links four circulating proteins to intervertebral disc disorders</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/genetic-screening-links-four-circulating-proteins-to-intervertebral-disc-disorders/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[circulating protein biomarkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[correlation between circulating proteins and spine health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DLK1 and intervertebral disc risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ferroptosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FinnGen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic instruments and linkage disequilibrium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic screening for intervertebral disc disorders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic variants associated with disc degeneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetically]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intervertebral disc degeneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mendelian randomization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mendelian randomization in musculoskeletal diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MST1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-omics approaches to disc disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nucleus pulposus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[prioritization of protein targets for disc disorder research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein quantitative trait loci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of MST1 in spinal health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAA1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single-Cell RNA Sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistical methods in genetic association studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TFRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[THP-1 cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tissue analysis of nucleus pulposus cells]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=328250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A local genetic screen linked MST1, DLK1, ITIH1 and SAA1 to intervertebral disc-disorder outcomes, while single-cell tissue analysis and a THP-1 experiment placed selected candidates in a heterogeneous but limited biological context.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A local Mendelian randomization screen linked genetically regulated levels of four circulating proteins with intervertebral disc disorders in FinnGen, while an analysis of human nucleus pulposus tissue placed selected candidates within a heterogeneous cellular landscape. MST1 was associated with higher odds of the FinnGen outcome, whereas DLK1, ITIH1 and SAA1 were associated with lower odds after correction across 1,723 gene-level tests. The findings identify priorities for replication rather than establish that the proteins cause intervertebral disc degeneration, because the available genetic instruments lacked an auditable linkage-disequilibrium clumping record and the FinnGen endpoint covered a broader category than strictly radiographic degeneration.</p>
<p>The study combined deCODE cis-pQTL summary data with the FinnGen R12 M13_INTERVERTEB endpoint, labelled “other intervertebral disc disorders.” After harmonization, 5,820 usable SNP rows supported screening across 1,723 genes. Investigators calculated single-SNP Wald ratios, inverse-variance weighted random-effects estimates when multiple variants were available, weighted-median estimates, MR-Egger slopes, heterogeneity statistics, Egger intercepts and leave-one-out estimates. Benjamini–Hochberg correction was applied to the 1,723 primary gene-level tests. The four multi-SNP signals that passed this threshold were MST1, with an odds ratio of 1.057, 95% confidence interval 1.038–1.077 and q = 4.15 × 10⁻⁶; DLK1, with an odds ratio of 0.933, 95% CI 0.903–0.964 and q = 0.016; ITIH1, with an odds ratio of 0.926, 95% CI 0.893–0.961 and q = 0.016; and SAA1, with an odds ratio of 0.927, 95% CI 0.892–0.962 and q = 0.023. These estimates describe associations between genetically proxied protein abundance and the recorded disc-disorder outcome, not direct effects on disc tissue.</p>
<p>Directional agreement was seen across several analytical methods for the four correction-positive genes: the weighted-median and MR-Egger estimates pointed in the same direction as inverse-variance weighting. Leave-one-out analyses also preserved the sign of each estimate when individual variants were omitted, and MST1 and SAA1 remained nominally significant after every displayed omission. Those checks provide internal consistency but cannot replace validation of instrument independence, particularly because the supplied pQTL table did not include a reference linkage-disequilibrium panel or an auditable record of variant clumping. The authors consequently described the results as local MR screening signals. TP53I3 and BPI were also examined because they were directionally concordant and present in the single-cell matrix, but their q values of 0.13 and 0.17 placed them only in an exploratory tier.</p>
<p>Human nucleus pulposus tissue supplied a cell-level view of the genetic candidates. The researchers analyzed GEO dataset GSE153066, which contains eight relatively normal libraries and eight libraries from degenerated discs. Quality control filtered the original 85,205 barcodes to 70,622 cells, retaining cells with more than 200 and fewer than 5,000 detected genes and less than 20% mitochondrial counts. Marker-informed annotation resolved eight broad populations: B cells, erythroid-like cells, fibroblasts, macrophages, natural killer cells, nucleus-pulposus chondrocyte-like cells, T cells and a deliberately unresolved stress population. Low-specificity clusters were not assigned forced identities, and the cell maps were treated as descriptive because individual cells from the same donor or library are not independent patient-level replicates.</p>
<p>Condition comparisons were instead anchored to the 16 libraries, with eight controls and eight degenerated samples treated as unpaired observations. Counts were summed within each library and transformed into log2 counts per million plus one for pseudobulk analysis. This design exposed substantial between-library heterogeneity and prevented the much larger number of cells from being mistaken for independent clinical evidence. The control group had a median age of 34.5 years, compared with 43 years in the degenerated group, but no age-adjusted or paired estimate was substituted for the unpaired screen. The dataset is cross-sectional, so its cell states cannot establish trajectories of degeneration or reveal whether a particular population caused a change over time.</p>
<p>Macrophages supplied the largest positive nominal difference in cell composition between degenerated and control libraries, amounting to 20.58 percentage points, with P = 0.031 and q = 0.250. The result did not survive correction within the composition panel and was therefore treated as exploratory rather than as an FDR-supported shift. Among 12 displayed follow-up genes, BPI had the largest positive library-level expression effect, with log2 fold change 2.932, P = 0.035 and q = 0.27. GCLM was also nominally positive, with log2 fold change 0.812, P = 0.044 and q = 0.27, but neither estimate met the within-panel false-discovery threshold. These findings indicate that some molecular differences may accompany degeneration while emphasizing that sample variability and multiple testing limit the strength of the conclusions.</p>
<p>A prespecified six-gene ferroptosis-related pQTL panel was analyzed separately from the four correction-positive multi-SNP genes. It included TFRC, FTL, AKR1C3, GCLM, HMOX1 and HSPB1, with a broader marker program that added GPX4, SLC7A11, ACSL4, FTH1, NFE2L2 and PTGS2 for expression context. TFRC was the only member supported in the genetic screen: a single-SNP analysis produced an odds ratio of 1.471, 95% CI 1.212–1.785, P = 9.42 × 10⁻⁵ and q = 0.023. Because this result rested on one SNP rather than a multi-SNP instrument, it supports follow-up but does not demonstrate that circulating transferrin receptor 1 is a causal driver of intervertebral disc disorders. The other panel members entered the tissue analysis as expression markers, independently of genetic significance.</p>
<p>The researchers also sought experimental support for selected findings in a human monocytic cell line. They differentiated THP-1 cells with 100 nM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate for 24 hours, allowed a 24-hour recovery, and then exposed the macrophage-like cells to 10 ng/mL each of interleukin-1 beta and tumor necrosis factor alpha for 24 hours. Relative to controls, the inflammatory condition produced higher MST1 expression, measured at 1.34 ± 0.07, higher BPI at 3.46 ± 0.28 and higher GCLM at 1.70 ± 0.12, while SAA1 expression was lower at 0.31 ± 0.03. Each comparison used four independent biological replicates per group and produced a two-sided Welch P value below 0.001. The directions were consistent with the corresponding library-level single-cell results, providing cross-platform concordance for four selected genes.</p>
<p>That laboratory agreement nevertheless has clear boundaries. THP-1 cells are a macrophage-like in vitro model, not primary nucleus-pulposus cells, and the PMA differentiation and recovery conditions can shape inflammatory responsiveness. The experiment therefore supports the plausibility of the measured expression directions in this selected system, not a mechanism of disc degeneration or a clinical effect in patients. Replication would require primary or disc-relevant models, prespecified stimulation conditions, independent biological replication and fuller qPCR reporting, including raw Ct values, primer details and verified amplification efficiency. The genetic analysis likewise needs independent instruments with documented linkage disequilibrium, broader outcome phenotypes, ancestry-diverse data and separate single-cell cohorts. Taken together, the study offers a layered candidate map linking circulating protein signals, cellular context and an inflammatory cell model, but it does not yet establish causal pathways, therapeutic targets or clinical interventions.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Genetic and single-cell evidence for protein signals and ferroptosis-related states in human intervertebral disc degeneration</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Genetically supported protein signals and ferroptosis-related cell states in human intervertebral disc degeneration: local pQTL–FinnGen screening integrated with nucleus pulposus single-cell RNA sequencing</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Tang, G., Wu, X., Lin, Y., Tang, Z., &amp; Liang, H. (2026). Genetically supported protein signals and ferroptosis-related cell states in human intervertebral disc degeneration: local pQTL–FinnGen screening integrated with nucleus pulposus single-cell RNA sequencing. <em>Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 14</em>, Article 1944218. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2026.1944218" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2026.1944218</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2026.1944218" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.3389/fcell.2026.1944218</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> intervertebral disc degeneration, Mendelian randomization, protein quantitative trait loci, nucleus pulposus, single-cell RNA sequencing, ferroptosis, TFRC, MST1, SAA1, THP-1 cells, FinnGen, Genetically</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">328250</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
