<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Portland cement &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/portland-cement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:13:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Cement-Free Geopolymer Concrete Survives a Year in the Sea, Challenging Portland Cement</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/cement-free-geopolymer-concrete-survives-a-year-in-the-sea-challenging-portland-cement/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alkali-activated materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cement-free geopolymer concrete durability in marine environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemically resistant ultra-high performance concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chloride ingress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly construction materials with reduced carbon footprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of chemical environments on concrete durability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical impedance spectroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact of Portland cement alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European research on sustainable concrete technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floating photovoltaics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolymer concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolymer concrete strength and mechanical properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolymer vs Portland cement in harsh conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HarshLab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative concrete for marine infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term seawater resistance of geopolymer concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine durability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NaturSea-PV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[steel fiber-reinforced geopolymer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfate attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable high-performance construction materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultra-high-performance concrete]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=230794</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A cement-free geopolymer concrete retained its full ultra-high performance class after twelve months of real Atlantic marine exposure, outperforming Portland cement UHPC under sulfate and acid attack while revealing magnesium sensitivity as its main weakness.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Concrete is the most-used human-made material on Earth, and the glue that holds most of it together, Portland cement, carries a heavy carbon footprint and a well-known list of chemical weaknesses. Now a team of European researchers has put a radical alternative through one of the most demanding durability trials yet attempted: a 100 percent cement-free ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete, tested head-to-head against a Portland cement-based ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) in the laboratory and then left to fend for itself for twelve months in the Atlantic Ocean. The results, published in Case Studies in Construction Materials as part of the European NaturSea-PV project, show that the geopolymer can match its conventional rival in the sea while beating it in some of the harshest chemical environments a marine structure will ever face.</p>
<p>The geopolymer mix, designated GEO, is built from ground granulated blast-furnace slag and silica fume, activated by a sodium silicate and potassium hydroxide solution rather than by any Portland cement. It achieves a compressive strength of 152 megapascals, comfortably above the 120 megapascal threshold that defines the UHPC class, and incorporates 1.5 percent by volume of steel fibers. Its Portland cement reference, designated REF, reaches 165 megapascals. The two binders differ at the molecular level in a way that matters enormously for durability. Portland cement hardens into calcium silicate hydrate gel accompanied by portlandite, a calcium hydroxide phase that is notoriously vulnerable to acid dissolution and to the sulfate reactions that produce expansive ettringite crystals. The geopolymer instead forms a potassium-containing calcium aluminosilicate hydrate gel, C-(K)-A-S-H, in which portlandite is entirely absent. Quantitative X-ray diffraction of the hardened GEO binder confirmed the point: nearly 40 percent amorphous aluminosilicate gel, quartz and calcite as the main crystalline phases, and ettringite present only as a trace of about one percent by weight.</p>
<p>The laboratory program subjected prisms of both mixes to a year of immersion in five solutions: distilled water, five percent sodium sulfate, five percent magnesium sulfate, nitric acid held at pH 3, and a combined magnesium and sodium sulfate bath designed to mimic the cation pairing of real seawater, albeit at accelerated concentrations. The sodium sulfate results were striking. The Portland cement reference expanded by up to 0.16 percent, the classic signature of ettringite-driven sulfate attack, while the geopolymer actually contracted slightly, ending near minus 0.05 percent. With its aluminum locked into the gel structure and no monosulfoaluminate to react, the geopolymer simply lacks the raw material for the expansive reaction. Under nitric acid the story repeated itself: the geopolymer showed negligible dimensional change, whereas the reference swelled by more than 0.2 percent at its peak, consistent with acid attack on portlandite and the formation of secondary products.</p>
<p>But the trial also exposed a genuine vulnerability. In both magnesium-bearing solutions the geopolymer expanded beyond the 0.10 percent criterion that ASTM C1012 uses to flag sulfate-susceptible behavior, peaking at 0.29 percent in the combined bath, the condition most representative of seawater chemistry, where the reference actually contracted. The researchers attribute this to magnesium ions exchanging with calcium within the calcium-rich gel, destabilizing the binding phase, and to brucite precipitation at specimen surfaces. The lesson is precise: for this class of binder, magnesium rather than sulfate as such is the principal chemical enemy, a finding that gives future formulators a clear target, namely lowering the calcium content of the gel through partial substitution of the slag with fly ash or metakaolin.</p>
<p>Chloride resistance, the parameter that governs reinforcement corrosion in marine structures, told a more nuanced story. In the rapid chloride penetration test the geopolymer passed an average of 254 Coulombs, classified as very low penetrability, while the reference recorded 43 Coulombs, classified as negligible. Both sit far below the 1000 Coulomb boundary for low penetrability, and both are orders of magnitude better than the 2000 to 4000 Coulombs typical of ordinary structural concrete. The derived diffusion coefficients, around 6.9 times ten to the minus thirteen square meters per second for the geopolymer and 1.2 times ten to the minus thirteen for the reference, both fall in the characteristic UHPC range. The authors caution, however, that the test measures total ionic current, and the potassium-rich pore solution of the geopolymer conducts far more readily than a Portland cement pore solution, so the raw charge figures likely overstate the true gap in chloride transport between the two binders.</p>
<p>Electrical impedance spectroscopy provided a continuous, non-destructive window into the microstructure throughout the year. Monitoring the impedance of instrumented specimens across all exposure solutions, the team found that both materials showed steadily increasing bulk resistance over 365 days, a sign of continued pore refinement rather than degradation. The geopolymer&#8217;s impedance was essentially unaffected by sulfate solutions compared with the water control, while the reference showed reduced impedance in sodium sulfate, an early indicator of sulfate ingress into its pore network. Most intriguingly, in nitric acid the geopolymer&#8217;s impedance rose to the highest value of any specimen, suggesting that the acid selectively dissolves the most soluble surface phases and leaves behind a densified, protective aluminosilicate layer that impedes further attack.</p>
<p>Elevated temperature was the one arena where the geopolymer clearly lost ground. After heating to 600 degrees Celsius, the reference retained 90 percent of its ambient compressive strength, while the geopolymer dropped to 36 percent, a result the authors link to the calcium-rich gel behaving more like conventional hydrates than like the thermally robust, low-calcium gels of fly ash geopolymers, combined with a coarser pore network that permits steeper thermal gradients and microcracking. Yet the comparison carries an important caveat: at 600 and 900 degrees Celsius only a single reference specimen survived heating in testable condition, whereas every geopolymer specimen remained intact, with no explosive spalling even at 900 degrees, where the reference spalled severely. Since sustained exposure to 600 degrees is not a realistic offshore service condition, the finding defines a known limit of the formulation rather than a barrier to its intended use, and points to remedies such as pore refinement and hybrid fiber systems.</p>
<p>The decisive test came at HarshLab, a floating laboratory in the Cantabrian Sea operated by Tecnalia in Bilbao, Spain. Geopolymer prisms were deployed for twelve months across three exposure zones, atmospheric, splash, and fully immersed, some uncoated and some carrying bio-based coatings developed within the project for antifouling purposes. On retrieval, the material had lost nothing that matters. Flexural strength ranged from 14 to 17 megapascals across all groups, essentially unchanged from the 28-day reference value, and compressive strength remained between 150 and 167 megapascals, in several cases exceeding the original laboratory figure, apparently because continued geopolymerization in the moist marine environment offset any chemical degradation. Phenolphthalein spraying showed no carbonation anywhere, and silver nitrate colorimetry revealed no chloride penetration front even in permanently submerged specimens. Electrical resistivity after exposure, between 560 and 1610 ohm-meters, remained an order of magnitude above the threshold for negligible corrosion risk.</p>
<p>The convergence of independent indicators, mechanical retention, colorimetric evidence, and electrical resistivity, is what makes this study persuasive. Accelerated laboratory tests can exaggerate or misrepresent durability mechanisms, but here the field campaign confirmed the laboratory picture: the geopolymer sustained its full UHPC mechanical class through a year of real Atlantic service with no measurable transport-related degradation. The authors are candid about limitations, including the single production batch, the small number of specimens in some groups, the absence of pore-solution normalization in the impedance data, and the fact that the field campaign covered only the geopolymer, since the reference mix was assessed separately by a project partner. Twelve months is also short against the decades-long service life of an offshore structure, and the magnesium sensitivity observed in the laboratory remains microstructurally unverified.</p>
<p>Even so, the implications reach well beyond floating solar platforms, the immediate target of the NaturSea-PV project. Offshore photovoltaics need substructures that avoid land-use conflicts and benefit from water cooling of panels, but they demand concrete that can endure seawater, waves, and decades of chemical assault with a fraction of the embodied carbon of Portland cement. This study demonstrates that a geopolymer binder can deliver UHPC-class strength, proven marine durability, and clear advantages under sodium sulfate and acid exposure, while identifying magnesium sensitivity and high-temperature strength retention as the principal remaining weaknesses. With a patent application covering the exact formulation and follow-up work already mapped out, from lowering the gel&#8217;s calcium ratio to refining the pore structure, the cement-free concrete that spent a year in the Bay of Biscay and came back stronger may be one of the most credible routes yet toward genuinely sustainable marine infrastructure.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Durability of a cement-free ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete compared with Portland cement UHPC under laboratory chemical exposure and real marine conditions</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Durability of a cement-free ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete: A laboratory comparison with Portland-cement UHPC validated by real marine exposure</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Sleiman, Y., El Oifi, B., Martin, C., Saiyouri, N., &amp; Sbartaï, Z. M. (2026). Durability of a cement-free ultra-high performance geopolymer concrete: A laboratory comparison with Portland-cement UHPC validated by real marine exposure. <em>Case Studies in Construction Materials, 25</em>, Article e06583. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06583" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06583</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06583" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06583</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> geopolymer concrete, ultra-high performance concrete, marine durability, sulfate attack, chloride ingress, Portland cement, floating photovoltaics, alkali-activated materials, HarshLab, NaturSea-PV, electrical impedance spectroscopy, sustainable construction</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">230794</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hidden Tunnel Networks Beneath Mine Roofs Trigger Dangerous Pillar Collapse, New Study Finds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/hidden-tunnel-networks-beneath-mine-roofs-trigger-dangerous-pillar-collapse-new-study-finds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 21:06:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Abandoned mine roadways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abandoned roadways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backfilling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal mine safety engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coal mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[destabilization of mine pillars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLAC3D]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goaf-side entry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goaf-side narrow coal pillars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of abandoned tunnels on active mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative support solutions for mine stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legacy roadway hazards in mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mine roof collapse prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mine safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[narrow coal pillar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[numerical simulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pillar stability in coal mines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Portland cement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roof block failure in underground mines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roof stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strata control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structural backfill using excavated coal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triangular block]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[underground tunnel networks]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=210301</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have revealed how clusters of abandoned roadways destabilize narrow coal pillars and overlying roof blocks in extra-thick coal seams, and demonstrated that backfilling these voids with cement-solidified excavated coal restores pillar strength and keeps mine roadways safe.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beneath some of China&#8217;s largest coal mines lies a hidden hazard that engineers have struggled to tame: dense networks of abandoned roadways left behind by decades of irregular mining. When operators attempt to extract the narrow coal pillars that separate these ghost tunnels from active workings, the consequences can be catastrophic. A new study published in Results in Engineering by Dongdong Chen, Zitao Chen, and colleagues reveals for the first time how clusters of these abandoned passages destabilize the slender pillars and the massive roof blocks above them, and demonstrates a remarkably practical fix that turns excavated coal itself into structural backfill.</p>
<p>The research focuses on what mining engineers call the goaf-side narrow coal pillar, or GSNCP, a thin ribbon of coal left standing between an active tunnel and a mined-out void. In extra-thick coal seams averaging eleven meters, these pillars are routinely riddled with legacy roadways from earlier, less regulated mining eras. When a new roadway, known as a goaf-side entry, is driven alongside such a compromised pillar, the results on site have been alarming: severe rib heaving, roof convergence, rib collapse, and even complete roof caving in zones where abandoned roadways cluster together. Traditional support methods such as bolting and grouting, the authors note, fail entirely under these conditions.</p>
<p>To understand why, the team built a large three-dimensional numerical model using FLAC3D 7.0, spanning 500 by 500 meters laterally and 300 meters in depth, discretized into half-meter cubic elements with more than 7.6 million cells in the critical study area alone. The model reproduced the actual excavation sequence of the mine, including dynamic compaction of the adjacent goaf using double-yield elements and stepwise extraction of the working face at one-meter cycles. The coal was governed by a strain-softening criterion while the overlying strata followed the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion, allowing the researchers to track how stress redistributes as abandoned roadways slice the pillar into segments.</p>
<p>The simulations revealed a striking sensitivity to the spacing between abandoned roadways. When intervening coal ribs between two roadways were narrower than five meters, the segments entered a low-strength bearing state and simply shed their load onto neighboring pillars, triggering severe rib heaving. At a width of seven meters, the internal abutment pressure peaked at a dangerous 27.9 megapascals in a single sharp spike, a condition the authors describe as an ultra-high strength bearing state in which the pillar risks internal plasticization and fracturing. Only when spacing exceeded nine meters did the stress curve split into a healthier bimodal shape, with the peak dropping to 23.1 megapascals and the load distributed across a broad high-strength bearing zone.</p>
<p>The second half of the puzzle lies overhead. Using the classical OX break theory of main roof behavior, the team developed a theoretical model linking the arc-shaped triangular roof block that forms above the goaf edge to the abandoned roadways hollowing out the pillar beneath it. This triangular block, whose dimensions follow the periodic weighting span of the main roof, rotates and subsides around a fracture line after the roof breaks. The researchers identified nine possible relative positions among the solid coal rib, the triangular block, and the abandoned roadways, and derived moment-balance equations for each configuration to determine when the block remains in equilibrium and when it fails.</p>
<p>The analysis produced two instability coefficients with clear physical meaning. When the coefficient K2 exceeds one, the triangular block undergoes rotational deformation instability, crushing the rock at its corners. When the coefficient K1 falls between zero and one, the block slides instead. Crucially, the calculations showed that as more abandoned roadways accumulate beneath a single triangular block, both coefficients decrease simultaneously, meaning the weakened pillar can no longer supply the support force needed to prevent sliding. Because at most three abandoned roadways can fit beneath one block, the team showed that the failure mode shifts from rotation to sliding as roadway density increases, with the block&#8217;s gravitational load transferring through the roadway roof to the solid coal rib and producing uncontrollable deformation, roof fracturing, or even roof cutting.</p>
<p>These theoretical predictions were tested in a 1:100 scale physical analogue model built from layered sand, lime, and gypsum mixtures matched to the site&#8217;s borehole geology, with hydraulic jacks applying 34.6 kilopascals to reproduce the overburden load at the mine&#8217;s 250-meter depth. The experiments confirmed the mechanism in all three fracture-line scenarios: with backfill in place, the pillar and roof stayed intact, but removing the backfill reproduced the full disaster pattern of pillar crushing and severe roof collapse observed in the field. The observed diagonal shear fractures, angled at roughly 55 to 60 degrees, matched the theoretical shear angle predicted by the Mohr-Coulomb criterion for coal with internal friction angles between 20 and 30 degrees.</p>
<p>Having diagnosed the disease, the researchers prescribed a cure that is as economical as it is effective: backfill the abandoned roadways with the very coal excavated during roadway driving. Laboratory tests determined the optimal recipe, mixing crushed coal, P425 Portland cement, and water in a ratio of 6 to 1 to 0.7. With a particle gradation of roughly 60 percent fines under five millimeters, the solidified mixture achieved a uniaxial compressive strength of 9.8 megapascals, about 80 percent of the raw coal strength of 12.3 megapascals, while still meeting the pumping requirements of mining concrete pumps. The mixture is pumped into mining-purpose backfill bags that prevent leakage into the goaf, with roof bolts fitted with end caps to avoid puncturing the bags.</p>
<p>Numerical simulations of the backfilled system showed a clear strength threshold. At just 20 percent of coal strength, the backfill carried little load and stress remained dangerously concentrated in the pillar. At 60 percent, the backfill began sharing roof load, though stress zones remained isolated. Only at 80 percent of coal strength did the stresses within the pillar and backfill merge into a single continuous high-strength bearing zone without peak eccentricity. The backfill also exerts lateral confinement on the flanking coal segments, creating what the authors call a strong-weak-strong configuration that boosts the pillar&#8217;s effective bearing capacity by approximately 27.9 percent when a single roadway among three is filled.</p>
<p>Field deployment at the 110203 longwall face validated the approach under production conditions. Borehole peeping through the pillar rib in the abandoned roadway concentration zone showed high internal integrity after treatment, and convergence monitoring recorded roughly 16 centimeters of rib-to-rib closure and 14 centimeters of roof-to-floor deformation at backfilled locations, figures notably smaller than in untreated areas. The study&#8217;s broader message for the industry is twofold: roadway density in protective pillars should be carefully controlled during mine planning, and where legacy roadways already compromise pillar integrity, solidified excavated coal offers a low-cost, locally sourced route to restoring load-bearing capacity and keeping goaf-side entries safe for mining.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Instability of goaf-side narrow coal pillars beneath concentrated abandoned roadways in extra-thick coal seams and solidification-backfilling control</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Instability mechanism of narrow coal pillars in extra-thick coal seam within concentrated abandoned roadway areas and solidification-backfilling control of roadway excavation coal mass</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Instability mechanism of narrow coal pillars in extra-thick coal seam within concentrated abandoned roadway areas and solidification-backfilling control of roadway excavation coal mass. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.112978" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.112978</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.112978" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.rineng.2026.112978</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> coal mining, narrow coal pillar, abandoned roadways, goaf-side entry, roof stability, triangular block, numerical simulation, backfilling, Portland cement, strata control, FLAC3D, mine safety</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">210301</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
