<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>pore water pressure &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/pore-water-pressure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:37:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Groundwater Is Quietly Dismantling a Lifeline Highway in Nepal&#8217;s Himalayas</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/groundwater-is-quietly-dismantling-a-lifeline-highway-in-nepals-himalayas/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[colluvium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disaster risk assessment in Himalayan districts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical resistivity tomography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrical resistivity tomography in Nepal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensic geotechnical studies in seismic zones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotechnical engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotechnical investigation of Himalayas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groundwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groundwater-induced slope failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Himalayas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impacts of fragile Himalayan geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infrastructure vulnerability in Nepal's mountains]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kali Gandaki corridor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landslide mitigation strategies in Nepal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landslides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monsoon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monsoon groundwater effects on hillside stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nepal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nepal Himalayan landslide risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phyllite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pore water pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seismic and geophysical methods for landslide detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slope stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slope stability analysis in mountainous regions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=250785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A forensic geotechnical and geophysical investigation has revealed that monsoon-driven groundwater ponding above low-permeability phyllite bedrock is causing deep-seated, recurrent slope failure along Nepal's critical Kali Gandaki Road corridor.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deep in the Lesser Himalayas of Nepal, a stretch of the Kali Gandaki Road corridor near the village of Sirubari in Myagdi District keeps failing, monsoon after monsoon, and engineers have long struggled to explain why. A new forensic geotechnical and geophysical investigation, published in Discover Geoscience, has now dissected the slope with an unusually thorough toolkit: three electrical resistivity tomography profiles spanning more than 1,200 meters in total, two rotary core boreholes drilled to 15 meters, an extensive laboratory testing program, and coupled numerical modeling of seepage and slope stability. The verdict is stark. The slope is not merely marginal; it is actively failing, with computed factors of safety of 0.858 on the hillside and 0.857 on the valley side under monsoon groundwater conditions, both well below the threshold of 1.0 that separates stable ground from moving ground.</p>
<p>The stakes extend far beyond a single hillside. Landslides are the deadliest natural hazard in Nepal, concentrated in the middle Himalayan districts where steep terrain, fragile geology, and intense monsoon rainfall converge. The Himalayan belt as a whole, a tectonically active arc stretching 2,400 kilometers, suffers landslide damages exceeding one billion US dollars annually and claims hundreds of lives each year. Nepal occupies roughly 800 kilometers of this arc, and approximately 83 percent of its territory is steeply sloping. The Kali Gandaki corridor, which follows the river of the same name toward the Chinese border, is a lifeline for about seven million people across 24 hilly districts, connecting them to markets and economic opportunity. When a slope like Sirubari&#8217;s repeatedly collapses, entire communities lose their connection to the outside world.</p>
<p>The Sirubari site sits at a geologically telling location: the boundary between the Lesser Himalayan Sequence and the Higher Himalayan Sequence. The Lesser Himalayan rocks here are low-grade metamorphic units, chiefly quartzite, phyllite, schist, and gneiss, and phyllite in particular has a well-documented susceptibility to landsliding. These rocks dip generally northward, sub-parallel to the regional fabric associated with the Main Central Thrust, making the rock mass anisotropic and prone to weakness under saturated conditions. Earthquakes readily fracture these relatively weak formations, and the fractured rock then accumulates loose debris that heavy rainfall can mobilize. In other words, the site combines a structurally weakened bedrock foundation with a thick blanket of loose, water-hungry debris, a combination that forensic studies elsewhere in the Himalayas have repeatedly flagged as dangerous.</p>
<p>To see inside the slope, the research team deployed electrical resistivity tomography using the classic Wenner electrode array, chosen for its depth of investigation, its precision in both horizontal and vertical detail, and its favorable signal-to-noise ratio. Three two-dimensional profiles, ERT-1, ERT-2, and ERT-3, were run across the landslide zone with a combined array length of 1,237 meters. The field data were inverted with the RES2DINV software, converging to root-mean-square misfits of 2.8 to 3.5 percent, comfortably below the 5 percent threshold generally accepted as evidence of reliable inversion quality. The resulting resistivity sections revealed a layered subsurface: organic colluvial topsoil a few meters thick, unsaturated boulder-dominated colluvium, saturated silty colluvium, and beneath it all, fractured phyllite bedrock grading from unsaturated to fully saturated with depth.</p>
<p>The most consequential finding was the sheer thickness of the colluvial mantle. In the central sections of the ERT profiles, the loose debris deposits exceed 21 meters, and locally may reach 30 meters, before the fractured phyllite bedrock is encountered. Multiple slip surfaces were identified within this mass, confirmed both in the field and in the resistivity inversions. Crucially, the geophysical interpretation was not left to stand alone. The team drilled two boreholes, BH-1 and BH-2, each to 15 meters, and extracted the resistivity values at the borehole locations to calibrate the ERT sections against the actual lithological logs. The sandy colluvium encountered in both holes corresponded to resistivity values of 80 to 300 ohm-meters, while the measured groundwater levels, 5.45 meters deep in BH-1 and just 1.13 meters in BH-2, aligned spatially with the boundary between high- and low-resistivity zones in the profiles.</p>
<p>The boreholes themselves told a consistent story. Neither intercepted bedrock within 15 meters, corroborating the ERT evidence of exceptionally deep colluvium. The material was overwhelmingly sand, between 73.45 and 96.50 percent, with gravel content of 0 to 7.51 percent and fines ranging from 2.86 to 24.39 percent. Natural moisture content ranged from 17.52 to 23.58 percent, indicating moderate to high moisture retention throughout the mass, exactly what one would expect from a slope sitting atop a shallow water table. Specific gravity values of 2.65 to 2.72 are typical of phyllite-derived material, confirming the debris&#8217;s provenance. Direct shear tests yielded friction angles between 24 and 32 degrees and cohesion between roughly 2 and 14 kilonewtons per square meter, with the weakest samples, those from 4 to 10 meters depth in BH-2, showing the highest fines content and the lowest strength.</p>
<p>With the subsurface architecture established, the team built a coupled numerical model in GEOSTUDIO. A SEEP/W finite element simulation computed steady-state pore water pressures through the saturated and unsaturated colluvial profile, using van Genuchten hydraulic conductivity functions estimated from the grain size distributions and hydraulic conductivities of 10 to the minus 4 to 10 to the minus 5 meters per second for the colluvium, against only 10 to the minus 8 meters per second for the phyllite. The pore pressure field was then passed to SIGMA/W for effective stress redistribution, and both were fed into SLOPE/W, which performed limit equilibrium analysis using the Morgenstern-Price method, satisfying both force and moment equilibrium. The critical slip surface emerged at 18 to 22 meters depth, a deep-seated failure plane buried within the colluvial mass, and the computed factors of safety of 0.857 to 0.858 confirmed that the slope is in active failure under monsoon conditions.</p>
<p>The mechanism that emerges from this convergence of evidence is groundwater-driven, not structurally driven. Monsoon rainfall infiltrates the thick, permeable sandy colluvium and then ponds above the low-permeability phyllite bedrock, building up pore water pressures at depth. Rising pore pressure reduces effective stress, and with it the shear strength available along potential failure surfaces, a mechanism long recognized in colluvial slopes in the Alps and the Himalayas alike. The authors note that because the baseline factor of safety is already well below unity with design parameters drawn from the middle of the measured strength range, the diagnosis of active failure holds even if the weakest measured values are used. Large tension cracks observed near the crown of the landslide provide independent field confirmation of the substantial stresses within the moving soil mass.</p>
<p>The forensic team is candid about the limits of the investigation. The boreholes stopped at 15 meters without reaching bedrock, so the deep-seated failure surface is inferred from converging indirect evidence rather than directly observed; no inclinometers were installed to measure shear zone movement; the seepage modeling assumed steady-state rather than transient monsoon conditions; and no systematic rock mass characterization of the phyllite was performed. As follow-up priorities, they recommend slope inclinometers, deeper boreholes of 30 to 35 meters to intercept the colluvium-bedrock contact, transient seepage modeling driven by daily rainfall records, and a formal probabilistic sensitivity analysis of the strength and groundwater parameters.</p>
<p>The mitigation prescription follows directly from the diagnosis. Because groundwater lowering is the dominant control on stability, the primary recommendation is subsurface drainage: horizontal drains installed at 10-meter spacing to depress the water table, complemented by concrete-lined surface drains along the slope crest to intercept runoff before it infiltrates. These are paired with soil nail reinforcement on a 1.5 by 1.5 meter grid, 8 meters long and inclined at 20 degrees, and bioengineering measures for surface protection, with a design target factor of safety of at least 1.3 for the permanent slope. The urgency is underscored by national trends: more than 800 rainfall-induced closures were documented across 41 Nepali highways during the 2024 monsoon alone. For the seven million people who depend on corridors like the Kali Gandaki road, the Sirubari study offers something rare in Himalayan landslide management, a site-specific, evidence-based account of exactly why a slope keeps failing, and a technically grounded path toward fixing it.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Groundwater-driven recurrent slope failure along the Kali Gandaki Road corridor in the Lesser Himalayas of Nepal</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Forensic geotechnical–geophysical investigation of groundwater-driven recurrent slope failure along the Kali Gandaki Road corridor, Lesser Himalayas, Nepal</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> KC, R., Mahato, A. B., Acharya, A., Ojha, B., Subedi, M., Misra, J., &amp; Acharya, I. P. (2026). Forensic geotechnical–geophysical investigation of groundwater-driven recurrent slope failure along the Kali Gandaki Road corridor, Lesser Himalayas, Nepal. <em>Discover Geoscience, 4</em>(1), Article 311. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-026-00680-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-026-00680-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-026-00680-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44288-026-00680-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> landslides, Nepal, Himalayas, groundwater, slope stability, electrical resistivity tomography, geotechnical engineering, phyllite, colluvium, pore water pressure, Kali Gandaki corridor, monsoon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">250785</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Clay Content Decides Whether Ancient Landslides Creep Back or Collapse Fast</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/how-clay-content-decides-whether-ancient-landslides-creep-back-or-collapse-fast/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Courtney Benton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ancient landslide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ancient landslide reactivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clay content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clay content influence on landslide stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cohesion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dormant landslide deposits in mountainous regions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geomechanical properties of slopes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazard planning for steep terrain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydraulic properties of clay-rich soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of rainfall on landslide behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landslide hazard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landslide hazard prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[material-based landslide risk assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permeability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physical model test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pore water pressure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rainfall infiltration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rainfall-triggered landslide reactivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reactivation modes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of clay in slope failure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shallow sliding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slope monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slope stability and landslide mechanisms]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=209201</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New model experiments show that the clay content of ancient landslide deposits determines whether rainfall triggers rapid shallow sliding or slow progressive collapse, and that reactivation occurs within the deposit rather than along the old failure surface.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deep in the mountains of China and across the world&#8217;s steepest terrain, enormous landslides that failed thousands of years ago lie dormant beneath forests, villages, and highways. These ancient landslide deposits look stable, but they are sleeping giants: under sustained rainfall, parts of them can stir back to life. A new study published in Natural Hazards reveals that whether one of these dormant masses reawakens as a sudden, shallow, dangerous slide or as a slow, incremental collapse may hinge on a seemingly modest variable — the amount of clay mixed into the sliding body. The finding, from Ruian Wu of the Institute of Geomechanics at the Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences and colleagues, offers engineers and hazard planners a practical material-based clue for predicting how ancient slopes will behave when the rains come.</p>
<p>The research team confronted a long-standing uncertainty in landslide science. Reactivation of an ancient landslide deposit under rainfall is governed by the coupled hydraulic and mechanical properties of the deposit — how quickly water moves through it, how much water it retains, and how the material&#8217;s strength changes as it wets. But scientists have lacked a clear picture of how these properties vary with clay content, and, critically, how that variation shapes the mode of failure. A deposit dominated by clay drains slowly but sticks together; a gravelly, sandy deposit drains fast but binds weakly. Which behavior dominates the response to a storm, and does that behavior change the style of reactivation? To answer that, the team ran controlled physical model tests paired with numerical simulations, isolating clay content as the key difference between two otherwise identical slopes.</p>
<p>The experimental design was deliberately rigorous. Both physical models shared the same geometry, the same rainfall intensity, the same material in the sliding zone at the base, the same boundary conditions, and the same monitoring layout. The only deliberate variable was the clay content of the sliding body itself. This kind of controlled comparison is rare in landslide research, where real slopes differ in a dozen confounding ways at once. By holding everything constant except the clay fraction, the researchers could attribute differences in behavior directly to changes in permeability, cohesion, and internal friction angle associated with that fraction. Matching numerical simulations allowed them to track wetting fronts and pore water pressure fields inside the slope in ways that surface instruments alone could not resolve.</p>
<p>What the two models did was strikingly different. The model with lower clay content had higher permeability, lower cohesion, and a slightly higher internal friction angle. Under the same rainfall, water penetrated it faster and more evenly: the wetting front advanced rapidly, the wetted zone spread spatially across a broad, continuous band of the deposit, and pore water pressure built up over an extensive area. Mechanically, the consequences followed. The slope first developed tension cracks at its rear, then failed quickly in a shallow slide along a brand-new shallow shear surface — a rapid, comparatively energetic remobilization of material that would give future inhabitants far less warning time than a slow creep.</p>
<p>The high-clay model told the opposite story. With lower permeability and higher cohesion, water entered the deposit reluctantly and stayed localized. Instead of a fast, shallow failure, the slope experienced an earlier localized collapse at its toe — the downstream end of the deposit — followed by a slower backward progression of instability, with the front edge collapsing much later. In other words, the clay-rich deposit failed incrementally, from the bottom up, in a staggered sequence that stretched the deformation over a longer period. For hazard purposes, the two styles represent very different risk profiles: the low-clay mode is a sudden event, while the high-clay mode is a progressive one that may offer more time for detection, evacuation, and intervention — but only if the retrogressive pattern is recognized for what it is.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most consequential finding is what did not happen in either model. Neither slope failed along the pre-existing sliding zone inherited from the original ancient landslide. In both experiments, the observed processes represented localized remobilization within the ancient deposit rather than a wholesale reactivation of the old failure surface. This challenges a common assumption in hazard assessment — that reactivation means the ancient slide simply slides again along its ancient track. Instead, rainfall can carve new failure surfaces within the old deposit&#8217;s mass, meaning that monitoring strategies focused exclusively on the known sliding zone may miss the deformation that actually threatens people.</p>
<p>The study also disentangles which physical property controls which aspect of the response, a distinction with direct engineering value. Permeability, the researchers found, mainly determined the rate, spatial pattern, and extent of rainfall infiltration — how fast the wetting front moved, how continuous the wetted zone became, and how widely pore water pressures responded. But the timing and the mode of failure could not be explained by permeability alone. Those outcomes reflected the combined changes in permeability, water retention, cohesion, and internal friction angle that come with changing clay content. In the low-clay deposit, weak cohesion and widespread wetting conspired to open tensile cracks at the rear and trigger rapid shallow sliding; in the high-clay deposit, strong cohesion delayed widespread failure while low permeability concentrated stresses near the toe, initiating a retrogressive collapse sequence.</p>
<p>The implications reach far beyond the laboratory. Ancient landslide deposits are abundant along steep river corridors such as the upper Jinsha River and the Sichuan–Tibet transportation corridor in China, where infrastructure corridors and growing settlements sit atop or below enormous dormant masses. Global climate change is intensifying rainfall extremes, and a substantial literature — including studies of rainfall thresholds for landslide occurrence and climate-induced reactivations — warns that reactivations of old slides are likely to become more frequent. Knowing the clay content of a deposit&#8217;s sliding body, which can be estimated from drilling, sampling, and geophysical surveys, gives practitioners a way to anticipate the failure mode before it unfolds: clay-poor deposits warrant rapid-response monitoring for shallow, fast-moving failures, while clay-rich deposits call for surveillance aimed at detecting toe deformation and progressive retrogression.</p>
<p>The authors note that clay content should therefore be considered when monitoring ancient landslide deposits with comparable material and geometric conditions, and when mitigating the hazards they pose. The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the National Key R&amp;D Program of China, the China Geological Survey, and the China Scholarship Council. While the model tests simplify nature — real deposits are heterogeneous, layered, and shaped by their own histories — the controlled pairing of physical experiments and numerical simulation provides a mechanistic foundation that field studies alone cannot supply. The broader lesson is humbling and empowering at once: the behavior of a sleeping landslide may be written in its smallest particles, and reading that signature could be the difference between a managed hazard and a catastrophe.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> How clay content controls the rainfall-induced reactivation modes of ancient landslide deposits</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Effects of clay content on reactivation modes of ancient landslide deposits under rainfall</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Wu, R., Guo, C., Han, B., Song, D., Li, X., &amp; Ma, H. (2026). Effects of clay content on reactivation modes of ancient landslide deposits under rainfall. <em>Natural Hazards, 122</em>(20), Article 646. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08415-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08415-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08415-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11069-026-08415-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> ancient landslide, clay content, reactivation modes, rainfall infiltration, permeability, pore water pressure, shallow sliding, cohesion, physical model test, landslide hazard, slope monitoring, Natural Hazards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">209201</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
