<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>polymer processing &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/polymer-processing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 08:26:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Ice Water Beats Room Temperature: Simple Cooling Trick Supercharges Shape Memory Rubber</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/ice-water-beats-room-temperature-simple-cooling-trick-supercharges-shape-memory-rubber/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 08:26:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooling technique]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooling techniques in polymer manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crystallization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cycle time]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elastomer blend]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frugal chemistry in smart material development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of water temperature on polymer programming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical stents and smart splints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural rubber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimizing shape memory polymer programming conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polymer processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of stearic acid in shape memory polymers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-healing composites with shape memory properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shape fixity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shape memory polymer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shape memory polymers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shape memory rubber applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shape recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simple cooling tricks to enhance polymer performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stearic acid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature-dependent shape recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermomechanical cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water cooling effects on shape memory materials]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=243797</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers found that cooling a rubber-stearic acid shape memory polymer with ice water instead of room temperature air dramatically improved shape fixity and recovery while cutting the programming cycle from 56 to 36 minutes.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shape memory polymers are materials with a party trick that never gets old: bend them, twist them, or stretch them into a temporary configuration, and they will hold that shape indefinitely until a specific stimulus, usually heat, tells them to snap back to their original form. This remarkable behavior has made them candidates for everything from self-deploying spacecraft structures and self-healing composites to medical stents and smart splints. Yet for all the excitement surrounding these smart materials, researchers are still wrestling with a deceptively mundane question that determines whether any of these applications can actually work in practice: how quickly and how reliably can the material be programmed into its temporary shape? A new study published in Polymer Bulletin by Rola Abdul Al Khader Abbas, Evan T. Salim, and Motahher A. Qaeed suggests that the answer may hinge on something as simple as the temperature of the water used to cool the polymer during manufacturing.</p>
<p>The material at the heart of the study is an elegant example of frugal chemistry. Rather than synthesizing an exotic new polymer from scratch, the team took ordinary commercial rubber bands and impregnated them with stearic acid, a cheap and abundant fatty acid, for two hours until the small molecule made up 31 percent of the blend by weight. The concept relies on a clever division of labor within the material. The cross-linked rubber network provides the permanent shape and the elastic restoring force, while the stearic acid acts as a switchable component. When the material is heated, the stearic acid melts and loses its crystalline structure, allowing the rubber to be deformed easily. When it is cooled, the stearic acid recrystallizes, physically locking the deformed shape in place. This swelling-based approach to creating shape memory polymers has attracted growing interest precisely because it transforms inexpensive, widely available elastomers into functional smart materials without complex synthesis.</p>
<p>Programming such a material follows what researchers call the classical hot thermomechanical cycle. The polymer is first heated above the melting transition of the switchable component, then mechanically deformed to a target strain, in this case 80 percent, and finally cooled while the deformation is held. The cooling stage is where the magic happens, or fails to happen. As the temperature drops, the stearic acid crystallizes and freezes the stretched network in its temporary configuration. But crystallization takes time, and during the window before the crystal network is fully established, the elastic rubber continues to fight back, slowly releasing some of the stored strain. The efficiency of the entire process therefore depends on how quickly and completely the material can be immobilized before that elastic recovery runs away with the programmed shape.</p>
<p>The Iraqi and Saudi Arabian research team asked a question that, surprisingly, has received little systematic attention: does it matter whether this cooling happens naturally at room temperature or is artificially accelerated with ice water? To find out, they compared two protocols. In the natural cooling condition, the deformed specimen was simply left to cool at ambient laboratory temperature of 23 degrees Celsius. In the artificial cooling condition, the specimen was first plunged into ice water at 10 degrees Celsius and then allowed to equilibrate at room temperature. The researchers then evaluated five key metrics of shape memory performance: the temporary shape fixity rate, the permanent shape recovery rate, the shape memory index, the recovery rate expressed as a strain measure, and a quantity they call the shape memory fill factor, which captures how close the material comes to ideal shape memory behavior.</p>
<p>The results were strikingly one-sided. Every single one of the five shape memory properties improved when artificial cooling was applied. The most dramatic difference emerged in how well the material held its programmed strain during the critical first ten minutes of cooling. Under natural cooling conditions, the specimen, which had been stretched to 80 percent strain, spontaneously released a whopping 57.7 percent of that strain within ten minutes. The rubber, in effect, was winning the tug-of-war against the slowly forming stearic acid crystals. Under artificial cooling, by contrast, only 9.6 percent of the strain was released in the same period. The rapid extraction of heat allowed the stearic acid to crystallize quickly enough to lock in the deformed configuration before the elastic network could recoil significantly.</p>
<p>This difference in strain retention cascaded directly into the overall economics of the shape memory cycle. Because natural cooling allowed so much strain to escape, the freezing stage had to be extended well beyond ten minutes to bring the shape memory fill factor of the naturally cooled specimen anywhere near that of the artificially cooled one and closer to ideal behavior. That extension proved costly. The total shape memory cycle time based on natural cooling stretched to 56 minutes, while the cycle completed with artificial cooling finished in just 36 minutes. In other words, a simple change in cooling technique, essentially the difference between a bucket of ice water and a passive wait, cut the cycle time by 20 minutes, a 36 percent reduction, while simultaneously delivering better shape fixity, better recovery, and a higher shape memory index.</p>
<p>The findings carry weight beyond the laboratory bench. In industrial settings, cycle time is money. Any process that requires nearly an hour to program a single part into its temporary shape faces an uphill battle for commercial adoption, whether the application is a deployable hinge, a packaging element, or a biomedical device. A 20-minute saving per cycle, achieved with equipment no more sophisticated than chilled water, could meaningfully change the throughput calculations for manufacturers considering shape memory polymers. The study also underscores a broader principle in materials engineering: the processing route is not merely a means of manufacturing a material but an active variable that shapes its functional performance. Two specimens of the identical rubber-stearic acid blend, programmed identically except for the cooling technique, behaved in measurably and dramatically different ways.</p>
<p>The work also fits into a growing body of research on fatty acid-switched shape memory elastomers. Previous studies have demonstrated that swelling cross-linked natural rubber with stearic acid or palmitic acid creates shape memory materials with tunable transition temperatures, and that the melting and crystallization behavior of the fatty acid network governs how mechanical deformation energy is stored and released during the cycle. Earlier work by some of the same authors characterized commercial rubber bands as shape memory materials and explored how cross-link density influences the shape memory effect in vulcanized natural rubber. The new study adds a practical but previously underexplored dimension to this literature by treating the cooling protocol itself as a design parameter, one that directly controls the competition between crystallization kinetics and elastic recovery that lies at the heart of the shape memory mechanism.</p>
<p>There remain open questions for future investigation. The study focused on a single stearic acid weight fraction of 31 percent and a single programming strain of 80 percent, leaving open how the cooling technique interacts with different compositions, strain levels, and deformation modes. The long-term durability of the material under repeated thermomechanical cycling, a known concern for shape memory polymer composites, was not the focus here. Nevertheless, the central message is clear and immediately actionable: for rubber-based shape memory polymers switched by small-molecule crystallization, artificial cooling is not a luxury but a necessity for functional efficiency. By chilling the material rapidly, engineers can freeze in more of the programmed strain, recover the original shape more completely, and slash the time each cycle demands. Sometimes the path to better smart materials runs not through novel chemistry but through a colder bucket of water.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effect of cooling technique on the shape memory performance and cycle time of a rubber/stearic acid shape memory polymer</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Effect of cooling technique on shape memory performance and cycle time of a rubber/stearic acid SMP in a classical hot thermomechanical cycle</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Al Khader Abbas, R. A., Salim, E. T., &amp; Qaeed, M. A. (2026). Effect of cooling technique on shape memory performance and cycle time of a rubber/stearic acid SMP in a classical hot thermomechanical cycle. <em>Polymer Bulletin, 83</em>(12), Article 674. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-026-06731-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-026-06731-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-026-06731-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00289-026-06731-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> shape memory polymer, stearic acid, natural rubber, thermomechanical cycle, cooling technique, shape fixity, shape recovery, smart materials, crystallization, polymer processing, elastomer blend, cycle time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">243797</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Green solvents unlock cellulose for the post-petroleum age</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/green-solvents-unlock-cellulose-for-the-post-petroleum-age/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 23:12:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodegradable polymers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellulose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellulose dissolution for 3D printing applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellulose polymer processing challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellulose-based biodegradable materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep eutectic solvents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentally friendly cellulose fiber production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green chemistry in cellulose extraction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[green solvent systems for cellulose processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrogen bonds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ionic liquids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lyocell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-derivatizing solvent chemistry for cellulose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-derivatizing solvents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overcoming cellulose's crystalline structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polymer processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-petroleum materials from cellulose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regenerated cellulose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[renewable cellulose sources from biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solvent systems for cellulose film and fiber fabrication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable solvents for cellulose dissolution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=224222</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A comprehensive review maps how non-derivatizing solvent systems, from alkali solutions to ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents, dissolve and regenerate cellulose into sustainable materials without chemical modification.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cellulose is the most abundant natural polymer on Earth, and in an era when societies are urgently searching for alternatives to petroleum-based plastics, it has become one of the most competitive candidates for a sustainable materials economy. It is renewable, biodegradable, mechanically flexible, and available in enormous quantities from wood, cotton, agricultural residues, and even bacterial fermentation. Yet the same molecular features that make cellulose so attractive also make it notoriously difficult to process. A new review published in Polymer Bulletin by Yunhui Bao, Qinyin Gu, Liangcai Wang and colleagues at Nanjing Forestry University, together with collaborators in Sweden, China, and across several institutions, systematically maps the scientific landscape of non-derivatizing solvent systems, the chemistry that allows researchers to dissolve cellulose directly and rebuild it into films, fibers, microspheres, and three-dimensional printed structures without chemically modifying the polymer itself.</p>
<p>The central obstacle is thermodynamic. Cellulose chains are packed into dense crystalline domains held together by an extensive network of inter- and intramolecular hydrogen bonds. This bonding is so strong that cellulose decomposes before it melts, which rules out the extrusion and molding routes that the plastics industry relies upon. The only practical way to shape cellulose at the molecular level is therefore to dissolve it in a suitable solvent and then regenerate it, precipitating the polymer back into a solid form in a controlled geometry. Traditional industrial processes, such as the viscose route, achieve this by derivatizing cellulose, temporarily converting it into a chemical derivative such as xanthate. Non-derivatizing solvents, by contrast, dissolve native cellulose through physical interactions alone, offering zero derivatization, lower toxicity, and the possibility of closed-loop solvent recycling.</p>
<p>The review organizes the field around a unifying mechanistic concept: hydrogen-bond competition and reconfiguration. Every effective cellulose solvent works by disrupting the hydrogen-bond network that holds the crystal lattice together, outcompeting the cellulose-cellulose interactions with solvent-cellulose interactions. When solvent molecules penetrate the crystalline regions and bind to the hydroxyl groups on the glucose repeat units, the packing collapses in situ and individual chains disperse at the molecular level. Regeneration then reverses the process: a coagulant, typically water, an alcohol, or an acid bath, strips the solvent away from the hydroxyl groups, and the cellulose chains reassemble into a new solid whose crystallinity, porosity, and mechanical properties depend on how fast and how completely that reassembly occurs. Understanding and tuning this competition-reconfiguration mechanism is, according to the authors, the key to designing next-generation green cellulose materials.</p>
<p>Among the solvent families surveyed, aqueous alkali systems occupy a special place because of their low cost and low toxicity. Sodium hydroxide-based systems, often combined with urea or thiourea, dissolve cellulose at low temperatures, typically around minus five to eight degrees Celsius, where the hydration shells around the alkali and the hydrogen-bonding co-solvents most effectively pry apart the cellulose chains. Work on NaOH/urea and NaOH/thiourea solutions has shown that molecular weight and temperature strongly influence solubility, and that fibers spun from these systems can display competitive mechanical properties. Additives matter as well: zinc oxide in NaOH solutions improves cellulose reactivity, and ball-milling pretreatment of wood pulp facilitates dissolution in NaOH/urea. Coagulation conditions, including bath composition and temperature, directly determine the structure and properties of the regenerated films and fibers, giving processors multiple levers for tuning the final material.</p>
<p>A second classical system is N,N-dimethylacetamide/lithium chloride, or DMAc/LiCl, prized for its ability to dissolve even high-molecular-weight cellulose while preserving the degree of polymerization. Molecular interaction studies have revisited the dissolution mechanism, showing that lithium ions coordinate to the hydroxyl oxygens while chloride ions and the amide solvent disrupt the hydrogen-bond network. This system has enabled transparent, flexible regenerated films from sources as diverse as corn stalk pulp, wheat straw, and ginger pulp, including antibacterial packaging films. Its drawbacks are practical rather than chemical: DMAc raises toxicity and cost concerns, and residual salts must be removed from regenerated films, which motivates continued searches for greener alternatives.</p>
<p>Ionic liquids have transformed the field since the landmark 2002 demonstration that chloride-based imidazolium salts dissolve cellulose. These designer salts, which are liquid near room temperature, can be tuned at the molecular level: the cation and anion combinations determine hydrogen-bond basicity, viscosity, and thermal stability, parameters often quantified through Kamlet-Taft solvatochromic scales. Superbase-based protic ionic liquids, amino acid ionic liquids, and diacid-superbase combinations have pushed dissolution efficiency to new levels, enabling filament spinning, aerogel fibers with exceptional toughness for thermal insulation and impact protection, and the recycling of textile cotton waste into regenerated filaments. Transition metal ions can even reduce the viscosity of cellulose-ionic-liquid solutions, easing processing. Crucially, many ionic liquids can be recovered and reused, aligning the chemistry with closed-loop manufacturing.</p>
<p>Deep eutectic solvents and inorganic salt hydrates represent the newest and arguably most economical branch of the family. Deep eutectic solvents are mixtures of hydrogen-bond donors and acceptors, such as choline chloride with urea or organic acids, that form a liquid at a temperature far below the melting points of the individual components. Metal salt hydrates such as zinc chloride hydrate, lithium bromide hydrate, and calcium chloride-lithium chloride molten salts act on a similar principle, using their bound water and ionic species to compete for cellulose hydroxyl groups. Recent work has demonstrated room-temperature dissolution in ZnCl2 solutions, in AlCl3/ZnCl2 mixtures, and in low-viscosity TMAH hydrate/urea eutectics, producing strong, transparent films and lignin-containing composites from unbleached and underutilized biomass. NMR studies of molten salt hydrates have clarified how coordination interactions protect glycosidic bonds during dissolution, preserving the polymer backbone while the crystal structure is dismantled.</p>
<p>The industrial benchmark remains N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide, or NMMO, the solvent behind commercial Lyocell fiber production. NMMO monohydrate dissolves cellulose through its strongly polar N-O group, and the resulting dopes can be spun into fibers with a circular economy profile. The review highlights bidirectional concentration effects, in which NMMO concentration governs both dissolution and regeneration behavior, as well as ternary NMMO/water/DMSO mixtures that enhance dissolution capability. Applications emerging from NMMO and related systems include ultratough anisotropic nanofiber films, responsive patterned films, flexible sensors based on regenerated cellulose hydrogels, and personal cooling textiles incorporating boron nitride nanosheets. Across all solvent families, the review emphasizes that processing parameters, solvent choice, cellulose concentration, temperature, coagulation conditions, and pretreatment, collectively determine solubility, degree of polymerization retention, and the properties of the regenerated material.</p>
<p>What makes this review timely is its translation of fundamental mechanisms into a technical roadmap for high-value products. Membranes for oil-water separation, antibacterial food packaging, aerogels for thermal insulation, hydrogels for flexible electronics, sutures, and lightweight 3D-printed all-cellulose structures all flow from the same dissolution-regeneration logic, differing only in how the solvent, the coagulation, and the shaping step are orchestrated. The authors argue that precise control of hydrogen-bond competition allows molecular-level dispersion to be converted into deliberately designed architectures, whether by bottom-up assembly or top-down deconstruction of biomass. The remaining challenges are equally clear: scaling low-energy regeneration, achieving truly closed-loop solvent recycling, integrating functionality without sacrificing biodegradability, and ensuring that biobased microfibers do not simply replace one pollution problem with another. As the post-petroleum transition accelerates, the ability to dissolve and rebuild the world&#8217;s most abundant polymer with green, recyclable solvents may prove one of the decisive technologies of sustainable manufacturing.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Non-derivatizing solvent systems for dissolving and regenerating cellulose into functional sustainable materials</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Non-derivatizing solvent systems for regenerated cellulose: from fundamentals to applications</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Non-derivatizing solvent systems for regenerated cellulose: from fundamentals to applications. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-026-06698-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-026-06698-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-026-06698-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00289-026-06698-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> cellulose, non-derivatizing solvents, ionic liquids, deep eutectic solvents, hydrogen bonds, regenerated cellulose, green chemistry, biodegradable polymers, Lyocell, sustainable materials, biomass, polymer processing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">224222</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
