<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>pollen viability &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/pollen-viability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 09:27:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Timing Is Everything: Scientists Decode the Reproductive Secrets That Could Supercharge Chrysanthemum Breeding</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/timing-is-everything-scientists-decode-the-reproductive-secrets-that-could-supercharge-chrysanthemum-breeding/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 09:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anther dehiscence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asteraceae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrysanthemum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chrysanthemum breeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floral morphology and reproductive barriers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic complexity of allohexaploid chrysanthemums]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic mapping of chrysanthemum varieties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybridization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hybridization challenges in polyploid plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving seed set and hybrid success rates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimizing hybrid production in ornamental horticulture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overcoming self-incompatibility in flower breeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant breeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollen germination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollen morphology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollen viability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[practical roadmap for chrysanthemum hybridization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reproductive biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive biology of ornamental flowers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive synchronization in flower breeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stigma receptivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timing of pollen release and stigma receptivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TTC staining]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=221710</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A detailed study of fourteen chrysanthemum genotypes has identified the optimal pollination window, the best germination medium, and the most promising parent varieties for efficient hybrid breeding.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chrysanthemums are among the most commercially important ornamental flowers on Earth, gracing bouquets, gardens, and windowsills across continents. Yet behind their dazzling diversity of colors and forms lies a stubborn breeding bottleneck: crossing them successfully is notoriously difficult. A new study from researchers at the ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute in New Delhi, published in Discover Plants, has now mapped the reproductive biology of fourteen diverse chrysanthemum genotypes in unprecedented detail, identifying the precise windows when pollen release and stigma receptivity overlap and pinpointing which varieties make the best parents. The findings promise to give breeders a practical roadmap for producing novel hybrids with far greater efficiency.</p>
<p>The challenge stems from the chrysanthemum&#8217;s peculiar genetics. Modern cultivars carry an allohexaploid genome, meaning they possess six sets of chromosomes derived from different ancestral species, combined with extreme heterozygosity and sporophytic self-incompatibility, a system that prevents self-fertilization. These factors conspire to produce irregular hybridization and poor seed set, frustrating conventional breeding programs. Compounding the difficulty, the chrysanthemum flower head, or capitulum, contains two distinct floret types: pistillate ray florets at the periphery and bisexual disc florets at the center. The bifurcated stigmas of the ray florets typically become receptive before the flower fully opens, favoring cross-pollination, but successful fertilization demands that viable pollen arrive exactly when the stigma is ready.</p>
<p>To untangle this timing puzzle, the research team grew fourteen genotypes sourced from Indian and international breeding programs, including varieties from CSIR-NBRI Lucknow, Punjab Agricultural University, and ICAR-IARI&#8217;s own collections, alongside exotic material maintained in the institute&#8217;s germplasm repository. During the peak flowering seasons of 2023-24 and 2024-25, they bagged flower buds before anthesis to prevent contamination from stray pollen, then monitored them at intervals of thirty minutes to one hour from early morning until late afternoon. The results were strikingly consistent: no anther dehiscence occurred before 9:15 in the morning or after 2:30 in the afternoon. Instead, pollen release concentrated in a sunny midday window between 11:00 AM and 1:30 PM, with total dehiscence lasting between four and four hours forty-five minutes across genotypes.</p>
<p>Not all varieties performed equally during this critical period. Pusa Aditya recorded the longest peak dehiscence period at two hours and thirty minutes, followed by Flirt, Pusa Chitraksha, Pusa Shwet, Red Spoon, and Sensation, each sustaining maximum pollen shedding for two hours and fifteen minutes. At the other end, Aprajita Yellow managed only one hour forty-five minutes of peak release. The researchers attribute these differences to floral development and environmental responsiveness, noting that the cool mornings and high humidity of the northern Indian plains delay dehiscence, while bright late-morning sunshine accelerates it. For breeders, the message is clear: collect pollen during the midday peak, and choose male parents like Pusa Aditya that keep shedding longest.</p>
<p>On the female side, the team assessed stigma receptivity using the hydrogen peroxide test, a rapid method in which peroxidase enzymes on a receptive stigma break down hydrogen peroxide and release visible oxygen bubbles. Scoring receptivity on a four-point scale under a stereo zoom microscope, they found that moderate to high receptivity of the outer ray florets persisted for roughly three days, from the fourth through the sixth day after emasculation, in Flirt, Pusa Shwet, and Pusa Guldasta. Flirt and Pusa Shwet reached their maximum receptivity on the fifth day, Pusa Guldasta between the fifth and sixth, and Sensation and Ragini on the sixth. Aprajita Yellow, by contrast, never achieved the highest receptivity score, marking it as a less reliable female parent. Crucially, the window of peak stigma receptivity coincided with active anther dehiscence, confirming a favorable natural overlap for controlled pollination.</p>
<p>The study then turned to pollen architecture, examining sixty grains per genotype under a Hitachi field emission scanning electron microscope. Chrysanthemum pollen proved uniformly tricolporate, bearing three colpi and pores, with an echinate exine studded by conical spines with wide bases and blunt to pointed tips. Based on the ratio of polar length to equatorial diameter, which ranged from 0.96 to 1.06, grains were classified as oblate-spheroidal, spheroidal, or prolate-spheroidal, all characteristic of the Asteraceae family. Pusa Aditya and Red Spoon produced the largest grains, measuring roughly 33 micrometers in polar length, while spine length varied from 4.21 micrometers in Pusa Sona to 5.56 micrometers in Lal Pari. Although these morphological traits are largely conserved, the size variation may influence pollen hydration, germination, and pollen tube growth, subtly shaping reproductive performance.</p>
<p>Germination experiments revealed which genotypes carry the most vigorous pollen. After screening five liquid media combinations, the team identified a formulation containing 15 percent sucrose and 15 percent polyethylene glycol 4000, supplemented with boric acid, potassium nitrate, magnesium sulphate, and calcium nitrate at pH 5.8, as the most effective. Sucrose supplies energy for pollen tube growth, while PEG maintains the osmotic balance the tubes require. Using this medium, germination rates ranged dramatically from just 7.28 percent in Aprajita Yellow to 45.64 percent in Red Spoon, with Lal Pari at 45.10 percent and Ragini at 41.49 percent close behind. The sixfold spread underscores how much inherent pollen vigor varies even within a single ornamental species.</p>
<p>Viability testing added another layer of insight. The researchers compared three staining methods: 2,3,5-triphenyl tetrazolium chloride, Lugol&#8217;s iodine solution, and acetocarmine. Acetocarmine produced the highest apparent viability at 75.81 percent, followed by Lugol&#8217;s at 61.25 percent and TTC at 56.10 percent. But the higher numbers were misleading. Lugol&#8217;s stains starch reserves and acetocarmine stains nuclei and cytoplasm, so both can mark structurally intact grains as viable even when they have lost the metabolic capacity to germinate. TTC, by contrast, is reduced to a red formazan compound only by active dehydrogenase enzymes in living, metabolically functional pollen. Because TTC results aligned closely with actual in vitro germination, the team concluded it is the most reliable indicator of functional viability, a finding with direct practical value for breeders screening candidate pollen parents.</p>
<p>When all the reproductive traits were integrated, a clear hierarchy of parental value emerged. Red Spoon, Pusa Aditya, and Ragini consistently ranked among the top performers across anther dehiscence, pollen size, germination, and viability, making them ideal pollen parents. Flirt, Pusa Guldasta, Pusa Shwet, and Sensation offered prolonged stigmatic receptivity, providing a wider fertilization window and marking them as desirable female parents. Mean pollen viability ranged from 46.19 percent in Aprajita Yellow to 78.96 percent in Ragini, with Pusa Aditya and Red Spoon statistically comparable to the leader, further cementing their status as elite breeding material.</p>
<p>Beyond the immediate practical guidance, the study fills a genuine knowledge gap in ornamental crop science. Systematic data on the synchronization of reproductive events in chrysanthemum has remained scarce, even as the crop&#8217;s global value continues to climb. By defining the optimal pollen collection window, identifying genotypes with extended receptivity, and validating a reliable viability assay, the researchers have converted reproductive biology from an obstacle into a tool. For a flower whose dazzling variety was built over centuries through hybridization, mutation, and selection, this work offers a scientifically grounded way to accelerate the next generation of chrysanthemum cultivars, ensuring that breeders spend less time on failed crosses and more time creating the colors and forms that captivate gardeners worldwide.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Reproductive biology and pollen traits affecting hybridization efficiency in chrysanthemum</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Assessment of reproductive traits influencing breeding efficiency in chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.)</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> N, S., UN, S., Banyal, N., Tiwari, A. K., MB, A. K., Kumar, S., Talukdar, A., &amp; Kumar, G. (2026). Assessment of reproductive traits influencing breeding efficiency in chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat.). <em>Discover Plants, 3</em>(1), Article 427. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-026-00911-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-026-00911-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-026-00911-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44372-026-00911-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> chrysanthemum, reproductive biology, anther dehiscence, stigma receptivity, pollen viability, pollen germination, pollen morphology, plant breeding, hybridization, floriculture, TTC staining, Asteraceae</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">221710</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chromosome Chaos: How Aneuploid Rapeseed Keeps Pollen Alive Despite Meiotic Errors</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/chromosome-chaos-how-aneuploid-rapeseed-keeps-pollen-alive-despite-meiotic-errors/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 18:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aneuploidy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brassica napus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromosome chaos in rapeseed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromosome inheritance in Brassica species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromosome pairing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromosome segregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cytogenetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolutionary significance of aneuploidy in crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic diversity in rapeseed due to aneuploidy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genome structure of allotetraploid rapeseed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of chromosome imbalance on plant fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meiotic chromosome tracking in plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meiotic errors in Brassica napus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nondisjunction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant aneuploidy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pollen viability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polyploidy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapeseed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rDNA loci]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reproductive mechanisms in aneuploid plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of aneuploidy in plant evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speciation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=218250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new cytogenetic study reveals how individual chromosomes in aneuploid Brassica napus pair and segregate during meiosis, explaining why these plants retain partial pollen viability.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When plants end up with the wrong number of chromosomes, the consequences are usually dire. Cells starved of, or overloaded with, gene copies struggle to divide, grow, and reproduce, and in animals the result is often lethal. Yet in the plant kingdom, aneuploidy, the condition of having extra or missing individual chromosomes, is surprisingly common, and it has long been suspected of acting as a creative force in evolution, an intermediate state from which new species and new traits can emerge. A study published in Heredity by Yao Cao, Tingting Liu, Junxiong Xu, Wenqing Shi, and Zhiyong Xiong now provides one of the most detailed accounts yet of how aneuploid plants manage to reproduce at all, by tracking every chromosome through the critical stages of meiosis in rapeseed, Brassica napus.</p>
<p>Brassica napus, the species behind canola and rapeseed oil, is an allotetraploid, meaning it carries the combined genomes of two ancestral species, Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea. Its genome is a patchwork of A-subgenome and C-subgenome chromosomes, most of which exist as homologous pairs inherited from each progenitor. This makes the species an ideal testing ground for questions about aneuploidy. Because the two subgenomes are related but not identical, their chromosomes can occasionally pair with one another during meiosis, a phenomenon known as homoeologous pairing, which adds a layer of complexity that pure diploids lack. The research team exploited this system to ask a deceptively simple question: when a plant has one, two, three, or four copies of a given chromosome instead of the usual two, what exactly happens to that chromosome during the cell divisions that produce pollen?</p>
<p>The answer required watching meiosis chromosome by chromosome. Using cytogenetic techniques that allow individual chromosomes of B. napus to be identified under the microscope, the researchers examined pollen mother cells at two decisive stages: diakinesis, the final phase of the first meiotic prophase when chromosomes have condensed and paired in preparation for division, and anaphase I, when homologous chromosomes are pulled toward opposite poles of the dividing cell. At diakinesis, the configuration a chromosome adopts, whether it pairs as a bivalent with its homolog, as a trivalent with two partners, or remains unpaired as a univalent, largely determines how it will segregate later. By scoring these configurations in plants with complex karyotypes containing chromosomes present in one to four copies, the team could connect pairing behavior directly to inheritance patterns.</p>
<p>The results revealed a strikingly orderly set of rules governing how each chromosome dosage behaves. Chromosomes present in four copies, the tetrasomic condition, primarily formed either quadrivalents, in which all four copies pair together, or two independent bivalents, and they segregated equally, with two copies delivered to each pole. Chromosomes present in three copies, the trisomic condition, showed a mixed strategy, sometimes forming a trivalent involving all three copies and sometimes a bivalent-plus-univalent arrangement, but regardless of the pairing configuration, they segregated exclusively in a one-to-two fashion, sending one copy to one pole and two to the other. Chromosomes present in the normal two copies, the disomic condition, paired and segregated essentially normally. Finally, chromosomes present in a single copy, the monosomic condition, remained predominantly as univalents and segregated randomly, drifting to whichever pole they happened to attach to.</p>
<p>These findings matter because they show that aneuploid B. napus plants do not descend into complete meiotic chaos. Instead, each dosage class follows a predictable segregation pattern, which means that viable aneuploid gametes, pollen grains carrying the same unbalanced chromosome complements as the parent plant, can be produced in appreciable numbers. The study demonstrated that aneuploids of B. napus complete meiosis successfully and generate viable aneuploid male gametes, a result that helps explain how aneuploid lineages can persist across generations rather than being immediately eliminated by natural selection. This reproductive capacity is precisely what allows aneuploidy to serve as an evolutionary intermediate, giving raw material for speciation and phenotypic diversification time to act.</p>
<p>But the picture is not entirely tidy. The researchers also documented a series of pairing abnormalities that arise at diakinesis in aneuploid plants. Among the most significant were nonhomologous associations involving homoeologous chromosomes, the related chromosomes from the A and C subgenomes that are similar enough in sequence to sometimes pair with one another instead of, or in addition to, their true homologs. The team also observed nonhomologous associations involving 45S rDNA loci, the chromosomal sites that harbor the genes for ribosomal RNA, which are known to be hotspots for unusual interactions in plant nuclei. Such mispairing is more than a curiosity: if homoeologous chromosomes recombine, entire blocks of genetic information can be exchanged between subgenomes, reshuffling the genome in ways that may either destabilize fertility or generate novel variation on which evolution can act.</p>
<p>The most consequential abnormality, however, emerged at anaphase I. Homologous nondisjunction, the failure of paired homologous chromosomes to separate properly and move to opposite poles, was the most prevalent irregularity observed during this stage in the aneuploid plants. When nondisjunction occurs, both copies of a chromosome can be dragged to the same pole, producing gametes that carry either an extra copy or no copy at all of that chromosome. Critically, the study found a negative correlation between pollen viability and the frequency of chromosomal aberrations at anaphase I. In other words, the more segregation errors a plant&#8217;s pollen mother cells committed at this stage, the lower the proportion of its pollen grains that were viable. This correlation pinpoints anaphase I as the key bottleneck through which meiotic errors translate into reduced male fertility in aneuploids.</p>
<p>The findings carry implications well beyond rapeseed. Aneuploidy is a double-edged phenomenon in biology: in humans, it is the leading cause of miscarriage and developmental disorders such as Down syndrome, arising from the same kinds of meiotic nondisjunction events documented in this study; in plants, it is a engine of genome evolution and a practical challenge for breeders. In crops derived from polyploid ancestors, including wheat, cotton, and Brassica species, aneuploid individuals regularly appear in breeding populations and in progeny of wide crosses, and their fertility determines whether useful traits can be transmitted. Understanding which chromosome dosages segregate predictably and which generate errors gives breeders a cytogenetic framework for predicting the behavior of aneuploid material, whether the goal is to introgress genes from wild relatives, maintain novel chromosome combinations, or stabilize synthetic polyploids.</p>
<p>The study also speaks to a long-standing debate about how polyploid genomes achieve stability after their formation. When B. napus first arose from the hybridization of its two diploid progenitors, its newly combined genome had to learn to keep A-genome and C-genome chromosomes apart during meiosis, pairing only true homologs. Previous work by some of the same authors had shown that genome balance and gene dosage effects drive the formation of allopolyploids in Brassica, and that chromosome compensation mechanisms help maintain that balance in resynthesized lines. The new results extend this framework into the aneuploid realm, showing that the meiotic machinery of B. napus retains enough flexibility to handle chromosomes in non-standard copy numbers while still enforcing, imperfectly but effectively, the rules of homologous segregation.</p>
<p>What emerges from this work is a nuanced portrait of aneuploid meiosis: not the wholesale breakdown one might expect from cells with unbalanced genomes, but a structured process in which dosage dictates pairing, pairing dictates segregation, and a small set of recurring errors, chiefly homologous nondisjunction and homoeologous mispairing, determines how much viable pollen a plant can produce. For evolutionary biologists, it clarifies the mechanistic basis of partial fertility in plant aneuploids, the property that lets unbalanced genomes survive long enough to matter. For cytogeneticists and breeders, it provides a practical map of chromosome behavior that can guide the use of aneuploid lines in crop improvement. And for anyone fascinated by the resilience of genomes, it is a reminder that even when the chromosome count goes wrong, life finds orderly ways to keep dividing, adapting, and evolving.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Meiotic chromosome behavior and pollen viability in aneuploid Brassica napus</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Key meiotic abnormalities impair pollen viability in aneuploid Brassica napus</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Cao, Y., Liu, T., Xu, J., Shi, W., &amp; Xiong, Z. (2026). Key meiotic abnormalities impair pollen viability in aneuploid Brassica napus. <em>Heredity</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-026-00890-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-026-00890-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-026-00890-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41437-026-00890-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> aneuploidy, Brassica napus, meiosis, pollen viability, cytogenetics, chromosome pairing, nondisjunction, polyploidy, speciation, rapeseed, rDNA loci, chromosome segregation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">218250</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
