<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>plastic deformation-induced grain boundary modifications &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/plastic-deformation-induced-grain-boundary-modifications/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 00:57:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Deformation Rewrites the Grain Boundary Map of an Ordered Nickel Alloy</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/deformation-rewrites-the-grain-boundary-map-of-an-ordered-nickel-alloy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Sanderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 00:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis of Ni3Fe L12 superstructure in alloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atomic-level changes in polycrystalline nickel alloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coincidence site lattice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deformation effects on ordered intermetallic compounds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of ordered structures on dislocation movement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grain boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grain boundary engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grain boundary reorganization in nickel alloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Herring relation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of mechanical stress on low-energy grain boundaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications for alloy design for corrosion resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[L12 superstructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[materials science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ni3Fe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ordered alloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic deformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic deformation-induced grain boundary modifications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantitative study of crystal lattice reorganization under stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of grain boundary evolution in alloy strength and ductility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistical analysis of grain boundary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[strain hardening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Σ3 twins]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=260622</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Electron backscatter diffraction reveals that plastic deformation in ordered Ni3Fe both multiplies general grain boundaries and strips special twin boundaries of their low-energy character.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When a metal bends, stretches, or compresses, the damage is not confined to what the eye can see. Deep inside its crystalline architecture, an invisible network of grain boundaries—the interfaces where crystals of different orientations meet—undergoes a quiet but profound reorganization. A new study published in the Journal of Materials Science by O. B. Perevalova, E. V. Konovalova, and K. V. Ivanov has now tracked this reorganization in remarkable quantitative detail, showing that plastic deformation does not merely add new boundaries to an ordered nickel-iron alloy; it actively erases the special, low-energy character of many pre-existing ones. The finding offers a fresh, statistically grounded view of how the internal wiring of a polycrystalline material evolves under stress, with implications for anyone who designs alloys for strength, ductility, or corrosion resistance.</p>
<p>The material at the heart of the study is Ni3Fe, an intermetallic alloy that adopts the L12 superstructure, an ordered arrangement of atoms in which nickel and iron occupy distinct sublattices on a face-centered cubic framework. Ordered alloys of this kind are scientifically precious because their atomic ordering changes how dislocations move and how grain boundaries behave, making them model systems for understanding the interplay between chemistry, crystallography, and mechanics. In the undeformed state, the alloy&#8217;s grain boundary ensemble is dominated by a particular family of boundaries known as Σ3 twins, which correspond to a 60-degree misorientation between neighboring crystals and are among the most benign, low-energy interfaces a metal can possess. These coherent twin boundaries resist corrosion, block crack propagation, and generally improve material performance, which is why engineers have long sought to maximize their fraction through a strategy called grain boundary engineering.</p>
<p>To see what happens to this carefully ordered boundary landscape under load, the researchers turned to electron backscatter diffraction, or EBSD, a scanning electron microscopy technique that maps the crystallographic orientation of every point on a polished surface. The team examined four states of the alloy: undeformed, and three levels of compressive strain corresponding to roughly 0.1, 5, and 28 percent. These strain levels were chosen deliberately, because they span two distinct regimes of the alloy&#8217;s stress–strain curve: the transitional stage at low strain and the so-called stage III, the well-known strain-hardening regime that begins around 18 percent strain. For each state, the authors mapped four scan areas of 820 by 640 micrometers with a one-micrometer step, capturing between 3,500 and 4,000 grains and up to 400,000 individual boundary segments per condition. That enormous statistical base is what separates this work from many earlier studies, which often relied on small fields of view where a handful of unusual boundaries could skew the picture.</p>
<p>The headline result is striking. At 28 percent strain, within stage III of the deformation curve, the total length of high-angle grain boundaries—interfaces with large misorientation angles that act as strong obstacles to dislocations—increased by 93 percent relative to the undeformed state. At the same time, the length of boundaries classified as special type, meaning those that approximate low-energy coincidence site lattice configurations, dropped by 15 percent. The spacing between neighboring boundaries, and between general-type boundaries in particular, shrank markedly, reflecting the intense fragmentation of the original grains as deformation progressed. In other words, the alloy&#8217;s boundary network became simultaneously denser and less special, a double shift that reshapes how the material stores strain energy, conducts heat, and resists chemical attack.</p>
<p>The changes in the misorientation spectrum are equally telling. The fraction of boundaries sitting near the 60-degree twin orientation plummeted from 0.75 in the undeformed alloy to 0.23 at 28 percent strain. Meanwhile, the mean deviation from ideal coincidence site lattice parameters, averaged across the special-boundary spectrum, grew from 1.1 degrees to 3.8 degrees, and the kernel average misorientation—a local measure of lattice distortion—rose near the boundaries themselves. Taken together, these numbers describe a boundary population that is drifting away from its ideal, relaxed configurations and accumulating the kind of elastic distortion that accompanies dislocation pile-ups and strain incompatibilities between neighboring grains.</p>
<p>One of the most conceptually important parts of the study concerns energy. Classification schemes such as the widely used Brandon criterion label a boundary as special if its misorientation deviates from the ideal coincidence lattice angle by less than a tolerance that scales with the inverse square root of the coincidence index. But geometric proximity to an ideal boundary does not guarantee low energy, particularly in a deformed, non-equilibrium material. To probe this, the authors estimated the relative grain boundary energy at individual triple junctions using the Herring relation, a force-balance condition that links the energies of three boundaries meeting at a point to the angles between them. The analysis revealed that a portion of the boundaries that still satisfied the Brandon criterion at 28 percent strain were nevertheless not low-energy boundaries. This is a cautionary result for the field: a boundary can look special on paper while carrying the energetic baggage of deformation-induced distortion.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most elegant piece of the analysis is a quantitative length balance. The team asked a simple question with a complicated answer: where did all the new general-type boundary length come from? By comparing the boundary length budgets across the four strain states, they determined that roughly 90 percent of the additional general-type boundary length is supplied by the formation of entirely new boundaries, while only about 10 percent can be attributed to pre-existing special boundaries losing their special character and being reclassified as general. This partitioning suggests that the transformation of the boundary ensemble under deformation proceeds along two parallel tracks: the birth of new, disordered interfaces as grains fragment and subdivide, and a slower, progressive degradation of the twin population that once dominated the microstructure.</p>
<p>The authors are careful to flag the limits of their method. Because the analysis compares different samples deformed to different degrees, rather than tracking individual boundaries in situ as deformation proceeds, the 90-to-10 split should be regarded as an estimate rather than a direct measurement. In situ EBSD experiments, which follow the same region of a sample through successive loading steps, could in principle confirm the partitioning and reveal the microscopic mechanisms—dislocation absorption, boundary migration, twin decomposition—behind the loss of special character. Still, the statistical weight of the present data, with hundreds of thousands of boundary segments per state and experimental scatter reported across scan areas, makes the conclusion difficult to dismiss.</p>
<p>Why does this matter beyond the laboratory? Grain boundary character distributions are not academic curiosities; they are levers that materials engineers pull to control real-world performance. Twin-rich microstructures resist intergranular corrosion and cracking in stainless steels and nickel-based superalloys, and thermomechanical processing routes have been designed specifically to boost special boundary fractions. The new results suggest that heavy plastic deformation, the very process used to shape and strengthen components, works against those efforts in ordered alloys, converting a benign, twin-dominated boundary network into a dense web of general, higher-energy interfaces. For applications in which deformed ordered alloys must subsequently withstand corrosive environments or cyclic loading, this deformation-induced boundary degradation could be a hidden liability. At the same time, the work provides a quantitative baseline for modeling how boundary ensembles evolve during stage III hardening, feeding directly into the mesoscale simulation frameworks that next-generation alloy design increasingly relies on.</p>
<p>The study also reinforces a broader lesson that has been accumulating across decades of grain boundary research: the boundary ensemble of a polycrystal is a dynamic, evolving system, not a fixed backdrop against which deformation plays out. From the faceting and roughening transitions documented in classical studies to the twin-boundary engineering of austenitic steels and the deformation behavior of faceted Σ3 boundaries, the evidence consistently shows that interfaces respond to their environment as actively as the grains they separate. By quantifying that response in an ordered L12 alloy with unprecedented statistical rigor, Perevalova, Konovalova, and Ivanov have added a crucial data point—and a useful warning—to the growing picture of materials whose most important features live at the edges of their grains.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Grain boundary ensemble evolution in plastically deformed ordered Ni3Fe alloy with L12 superstructure</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Grain boundary ensemble transformation in ordered Ni3Fe alloy with L12 superstructure under plastic deformation</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Perevalova, O. B., Konovalova, E. V., &amp; Ivanov, K. V. (2026). Grain boundary ensemble transformation in ordered Ni3Fe alloy with L12 superstructure under plastic deformation. <em>Journal of Materials Science</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-026-13876-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-026-13876-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-026-13876-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10853-026-13876-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> grain boundaries, Ni3Fe, L12 superstructure, plastic deformation, EBSD, Σ3 twins, coincidence site lattice, Herring relation, strain hardening, grain boundary engineering, ordered alloys, materials science</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">260622</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
