<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Plantago lanceolata &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/plantago-lanceolata/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 21:19:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Leaf Litter Emerges as a Hidden Ally That Reshapes How Grassland Plants and Microbes Weather Drought</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/leaf-litter-emerges-as-a-hidden-ally-that-reshapes-how-grassland-plants-and-microbes-weather-drought/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Prescott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 21:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbuscular mycorrhiza]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[decomposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought impact on soil chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological responses to climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grassland drought resilience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grassland ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grassland ecosystem adaptation strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaf litter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaf litter and soil microbial interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term rainfall manipulation experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial community dynamics in grasslands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microlaena stipoides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nutrient cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant competition and cooperation during drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-soil interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plantago lanceolata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLFA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of leaf litter in nutrient cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil legacy effects of prolonged drought]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil-plant-microbe interactions under drought stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[species-specific plant-microbe relationships]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=214594</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A seven-year Australian rainfall manipulation experiment shows that leaf litter rewires plant-microbe relationships in species-specific ways, buffering drought impacts through shifts in root growth, arbuscular mycorrhizal associations, and litter decomposition feedbacks.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beneath every drought-stressed grassland lies a quiet negotiation between roots, microbes, and the decaying leaves that carpet the soil. A new experiment conducted by researchers at the Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment at Western Sydney University, published in the open-access journal Discover Ecology, reveals that this negotiation is far more species-specific than ecologists had assumed. The study, led by Jerzy Szejgis and colleagues, shows that leaf litter does not simply act as a passive fertilizer during dry spells. Instead, it actively rewires the relationships between plants and soil organisms, sometimes promoting cooperation and at other times intensifying competition for scarce nutrients, with consequences that could shape which plant species dominate pastures as droughts intensify.</p>
<p>The team drew on a rare scientific resource: a long-term rainfall manipulation experiment in eastern Australian grassland that had been running since 2014. On plots where rain-exclusion shelters had cut incoming rainfall by fifty percent for seven years, the soil itself carries a memory of prolonged drought, a legacy embedded in its chemistry and microbial communities. The researchers excavated soil from both droughted and ambient rainfall plots, transported it to the laboratory, and used it as the foundation for a carefully controlled growth-chamber experiment. This design allowed them to separate the historical imprint of drought from the immediate effects of reduced water availability, a distinction that most short-term studies cannot make.</p>
<p>Two common pasture species served as the protagonists: weeping grass, Microlaena stipoides, a native C3 grass with dense fibrous roots, and ribwort plantain, Plantago lanceolata, a forb that invests more heavily in shoots and tends to conserve resources under stress. Seedlings of each species were grown for twelve weeks in pots containing soil from the long-term droughted or ambient plots, maintained at either forty percent or seventy percent of water holding capacity, mirroring the field treatments. Crucially, the researchers added a twist: half the pots received a mesh litter bag containing roughly one gram of leaf litter produced by the same plant species, buried vertically in the soil to ensure direct contact with microbial decomposers. The other half received no litter, creating a clean contrast.</p>
<p>The measurement toolkit was correspondingly comprehensive. Plant root and shoot biomass were harvested and weighed separately. Soil nutrient pools were assessed using chloroform fumigation extraction, which distinguishes carbon and nitrogen locked inside living microbial cells from soluble pools available to plants. Microbial community composition was profiled using phospholipid and neutral lipid fatty acid analysis, biomarker techniques that assign signature fatty acids to broad taxonomic groups: Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, Actinobacteria, fungi, protozoa, and, via the neutral lipid 16:1 omega 5c, arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Litter bags were reweighed to quantify decomposition as percent mass loss, and statistical models including redundancy analysis tied plant performance to microbial profiles.</p>
<p>The headline result is deceptively simple: drought consistently reduced microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen across both plant species, confirming that water stress limits the soil organisms that drive nutrient cycling. Yet litter addition significantly boosted microbial biomass carbon under well-watered conditions and increased most microbial biomarkers, particularly in pots planted with the grass. On the plant side, litter addition increased shoot biomass for both species regardless of watering, hinting that decomposing litter released nutrients that plants could capture. But the most striking findings emerged in the roots, where the story diverged sharply between species.</p>
<p>For Microlaena stipoides, litter addition increased root biomass under drought but decreased it under ambient watering, with the root-to-shoot ratio following the same pattern. This reversal suggests a fundamental shift in strategy. When water was plentiful and litter present, the grass apparently could afford to invest less in foraging roots, possibly relying more on symbiotic microbes to supply nutrients. Under drought, however, the combination of litter and dry soil pushed the grass toward heavier root investment, and the litter mass lost to decomposition correlated positively with both root biomass and the arbuscular mycorrhizal biomarker. In other words, under dry conditions the grass and its fungal partners appeared to work together to unlock nutrients stored in decaying leaf material, a genuine plant-soil biotic feedback rather than a simple fertilization effect.</p>
<p>Plantago lanceolata told a different tale. The forb showed higher litter mass loss overall, consistent with its nitrogen-rich, more readily decomposable leaves, and its biomass was broadly and positively associated with nearly every microbial measure, from bacterial biomarkers to microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen. This pattern suggests an ongoing, mutually beneficial exchange in nutrient cycling between the forb and the soil community. Even so, some nuances appeared: in the presence of litter under ambient conditions, biomarkers for Gram-positive bacteria and Actinobacteria declined, and under drought with litter, biomarkers for Gram-negative bacteria, protozoa, and arbuscular mycorrhizae dropped, hinting that litter could also shift microbial dynamics in ways that were not uniformly positive.</p>
<p>The redundancy analysis crystallized the contrast between the two species. While Plantago lanceolata biomass rose in tandem with microbial abundance across treatments, Microlaena stipoides shoot biomass was negatively associated with microbial biomass carbon, and its root biomass was negatively related to fungal and bacterial biomarkers. The authors interpret this as resource competition: when nutrients run short, microorganisms can immobilize inorganic nitrogen during decomposition, effectively hoarding it away from plant roots, and the grass responds by building more roots to grab nutrients directly. Yet even this competitive grass maintained one positive relationship, with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, suggesting that mycorrhizas occupy a special role as partners rather than rivals, particularly when litter provides a shared nutrient reservoir that fungal hyphae can penetrate.</p>
<p>Not every observation fit the researchers&#8217; initial hypotheses. Contrary to expectations, Gram-positive bacteria and Actinobacteria biomarkers were actually higher under drought than under ambient watering in pots without litter, particularly with the grass, indicating that some microbial groups are biologically adapted to desiccation, or that stress induces shifts in fatty acid composition that inflate these biomarker signals. Litter decomposition was also faster under drought, an unexpected result that the authors attribute to microorganisms investing more effort in mining litter for carbon when other resources are limited. These caveats matter: fatty acid biomarkers can persist in dead cells, and the twelve-week pot experiment involved only thirty-two pots and two species, limitations the team acknowledges openly.</p>
<p>The broader implications reach well beyond the growth chamber. As climate change intensifies drought frequency and severity across many ecosystems, the finding that litter mediates drought impacts through species-specific shifts in plant-microbe interactions suggests that the composition of plant communities will help determine how grasslands respond. A pasture dominated by a grass like Microlaena stipoides may lean increasingly on mycorrhizal partnerships and litter decomposition to survive dry years, while forb-rich communities may sustain nutrient cycling through close coupling with the broader microbial community. The authors point toward litter manipulation as a potential management strategy to enhance drought resilience, while cautioning that long-term field studies with more species are needed. What is already clear is that the dead leaves on the forest and grassland floor are not debris; they are active participants in the living economy of the soil, and their role becomes only more critical as the climate dries.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> How leaf litter moderates drought effects on plant growth and soil microbial communities through species-specific plant-soil biotic interactions</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Drought impacts on plants and microbes are moderated by leaf litter via species specific shifts in plant and soil biotic interactions</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Szejgis, J., Carrillo, Y., Dijkstra, F. A., Hassan, K., Maisnam, P., &amp; Nielsen, U. N. (2026). Drought impacts on plants and microbes are moderated by leaf litter via species specific shifts in plant and soil biotic interactions. <em>Discover Ecology, 2</em>(1), Article 4. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44396-026-00022-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44396-026-00022-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44396-026-00022-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44396-026-00022-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> drought, leaf litter, plant-soil interactions, soil microbes, arbuscular mycorrhiza, Microlaena stipoides, Plantago lanceolata, PLFA, nutrient cycling, grassland ecology, decomposition, climate change</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">214594</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Plantain Roots Quiet the Soil Microbes That Turn Fertilizer Into Pollutants</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/plantain-roots-quiet-the-soil-microbes-that-turn-fertilizer-into-pollutants/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 01:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ammonia-oxidizing microbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aucubin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological nitrification inhibition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological nitrification inhibition (BNI)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentally friendly fertilizer management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[herb-based soil pollution control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lolium perenne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural nitrification suppressors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrate leaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen fertilizer leaching reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrous oxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrous oxide emissions mitigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pasture herb chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant root metabolites for soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-soil-microbe interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plantago lanceolata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plantagoguanidinic acid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plantain roots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plantamajoside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root exudates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbial nitrification inhibition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verbascoside]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=213743</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New Zealand researchers have shown that ribwort plantain and even perennial ryegrass suppress soil nitrification through a broader suite of root metabolites than previously recognized, with the effect strongly shaped by soil type.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year, vast quantities of nitrogen fertilizer applied to pastures and croplands are transformed by soil microbes into nitrate, a form of nitrogen that slips easily through soil into waterways and feeds the production of nitrous oxide, a greenhouse gas nearly 300 times more potent than carbon dioxide. For decades, farmers have fought this transformation with synthetic nitrification inhibitors, chemicals such as dicyandiamide and 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate that can cut nitrate leaching by nearly half. But these products are expensive, short-lived in soil, difficult to apply and have raised concerns about residues ending up in food. Now a team of New Zealand researchers has taken a closer look at a humble pasture herb, ribwort plantain (Plantago lanceolata), and found that its chemistry is far more complex and its nitrification-slowing power more intriguing than the field trials alone had suggested.</p>
<p>The study, published in the journal Plant and Soil, set out to answer three linked questions: which metabolites in plantain are associated with biological nitrification inhibition, whether those compounds actually reach the soil around the roots, and how much the answer depends on the type of soil a plant grows in. Biological nitrification inhibition, or BNI, describes the ability of plant roots to release compounds that suppress the microbes responsible for converting ammonium into nitrite and then nitrate. The phenomenon is well documented in tropical grasses such as Brachiaria humidicola and in crops like sorghum, but the specific chemistry behind BNI in temperate pasture plants has remained stubbornly elusive.</p>
<p>The researchers began by growing six plantain cultivars in hydroponic systems, collecting the root exudates and testing them against Nitrosospira multiformis, an ammonia-oxidizing bacterium, in a plate-based bioassay that tracks nitrite production every fifteen minutes. The exudates reduced nitrification by anywhere from 14 to 66 percent depending on the cultivar and replicate, with the commercially promoted cultivar Agritonic generally sitting at the high end. That variability itself is telling: it means the BNI capacity of plantain is not a fixed trait but something that shifts with plant physiology, and it gave the team a natural gradient to work with when hunting for the chemical signatures of inhibition.</p>
<p>Using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry, the team profiled thousands of metabolites in leaves, roots and exudates. The headline compounds of past plantain research, the iridoid glycoside aucubin and the phenylethanoid glycoside verbascoside, were indeed abundant, sometimes reaching 55 and 200 milligrams per gram of tissue respectively. But here came the surprise: neither aucubin nor verbascoside correlated with the strength of nitrification inhibition. Instead, the best chemical predictors of high BNI activity were compounds that had received far less attention, including plantamajoside, another caffeoyl phenylethanoid glycoside, two unusual riboflavin sulfates, the iridoids asperuloside and pectolinarin, and a guanidine alkaloid called plantagoguanidinic acid that had never before been linked to nitrogen cycling in soil.</p>
<p>The identification of plantagoguanidinic acid may prove to be the most consequential finding. This molecule shares structural features with synthetic pyrazole-based nitrification inhibitors, which are thought to work by chelating metal cations such as copper, iron and zinc. Those metals are obligate cofactors for ammonia monooxygenase, the enzyme that performs the first, rate-limiting step of nitrification, and for hydroxylamine oxidoreductase, which carries out the second. The riboflavin sulfates add a second thread to the chelation hypothesis: related compounds are known to accumulate in iron-starved sugar beet roots, where they help the plant sequester iron. In other words, some of the very chemistry plantain uses to scavenge scarce metals for itself may inadvertently starve nitrifying microbes of the metals they need.</p>
<p>To test whether these laboratory signals translate into real soil effects, the researchers grew Agritonic plantain and One50 perennial ryegrass in four contrasting New Zealand soils: an allophanic Andisol and a gley from the Waikato region, and pallic soils from Manawatū and Canterbury. After ninety days of growth in rhizopots, they measured the potential nitrification rate of the root-associated soil using a shaken-slurry assay. Plantain lowered the potential nitrification rate by 11 to 41 percent relative to fallow soil across all four soil types. More striking still, ryegrass, included as a presumed low-BNI comparison, lowered it by 0 to 39 percent, and in the two pallic soils the reduction under ryegrass was statistically indistinguishable from that under plantain.</p>
<p>That result upends a comfortable assumption. Chlorogenic acid, a long-recognized nitrification inhibitor first identified in climax ecosystems half a century ago, was the signature metabolite of the ryegrass root profile, and it, like the caffeic acid moiety in plantamajoside and verbascoside, can scavenge nitric oxide, an obligate intermediate in the oxidation of ammonia to nitrate. If ryegrass carries meaningful BNI capacity, the ecological calculus of mixed pastures changes: the benefit of adding plantain to a sward may depend less on plantain&#8217;s unique chemistry than on how any deep-rooted herb reshapes the rhizosphere, and on which soil it is growing in.</p>
<p>Soil type, in fact, emerged as the dominant force shaping the microbial story. Bacterial community structure, measured by sequencing the 16S rRNA gene, separated cleanly by soil type in ordination analyses, with no detectable treatment effect within soils. The proportions of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria to ammonia-oxidizing archaea, tracked through quantitative PCR of the amoA gene, were likewise governed almost entirely by soil: the allophanic soil favored bacteria, while the pallic soils favored archaea. Only the archaeal communities showed a statistically significant response to the plants themselves, differing under plantain compared with ryegrass and fallow, driven largely by the Waikato gley soil. The relative abundance of Candidatus Nitrosocosmicus, a dominant ammonia-oxidizing archaeon, roughly doubled in the allophanic soil in the presence of plantain.</p>
<p>Why would plantain suppress nitrification more strongly in the pallic soils than in the carbon-rich allophanic soil? The researchers propose several non-exclusive mechanisms. Chelation of copper and iron by exuded metabolites is supported by a striking correlation: the reduction in potential nitrification rate under plantain tracked the proportion of Mehlich 3-extractable copper and iron in the soil with R-squared values of 0.88 and 0.97 respectively. Scavenging of nitric oxide by caffeoyl compounds offers a second route, and one that different studies suggest hits ammonia-oxidizing archaea harder than bacteria, which would explain why the archaea-dominated pallic soils responded more strongly. High organic matter and allophanic clay in the Waikato soil may also simply adsorb and degrade the inhibitory compounds before they can act.</p>
<p>The authors are careful about what their data can and cannot claim. The metabolite measurements in rhizosphere soil varied over five orders of magnitude, so no individual compound reached statistical significance, and the bioassay itself is notoriously variable. They also entertain the alternative that root-derived carbon simply stimulated microbial growth and nitrogen immobilization, though the pattern of microbial biomass across treatments argues against that being the main driver. What the study firmly establishes is that measuring only aucubin, catalpol and verbascoside in plantain shoots is a poor proxy for nitrification inhibition, that plantamajoside and the riboflavin sulfates deserve a place in breeding programs as candidate markers, and that no single cultivar will suit every soil and climate. Before these metabolites become screening tools, direct experiments must confirm their mechanisms, but the vision is clear: pastures that quietly police their own nitrogen cycle, root exudate by root exudate, cutting pollution without a single added chemical.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Biological nitrification inhibition by Plantago lanceolata and Lolium perenne root metabolites across different soil types</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Plantago lanceolata and Lolium perenne metabolite profiles, their impact on soil microbial community structures and soil biological nitrification inhibition</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Peterson, M., Joyce, N., van Klink, J., Panda, P., Fraser, T., &amp; Anderson, C. (2026). Plantago lanceolata and Lolium perenne metabolite profiles, their impact on soil microbial community structures and soil biological nitrification inhibition. <em>Plant and Soil</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09131-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09131-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09131-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11104-026-09131-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> biological nitrification inhibition, Plantago lanceolata, Lolium perenne, root exudates, aucubin, verbascoside, plantamajoside, plantagoguanidinic acid, soil microbiome, ammonia-oxidizing microbes, nitrate leaching, nitrous oxide</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">213743</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
