<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>plant biogeography &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/plant-biogeography/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 06:54:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Phylogenetic analysis links Xylopia’s pantropical spread to dispersal and habitat shifts</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/phylogenetic-analysis-links-xylopias-pantropical-spread-to-dispersal-and-habitat-shifts/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Prescott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 06:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ancestral-area reconstruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ancestral-area reconstruction in tropical flora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Annonaceae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogeography of tropical rainforest species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate influence on plant dispersal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispersal routes of Xylopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dispersals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolutionary history of tropical trees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitat shifts in tropical tree species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitat transitions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[island colonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[island colonization and endemism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long-distance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-distance dispersal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-distance dispersal in tropical plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phylogenetic analysis of magnoliids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phylogenetic diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phylogenetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant biogeography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tropical island plant diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultramafic ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ultramafic environment adaptation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xylopia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xylopia pantropical dispersion]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=327755</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A phylogenetic analysis indicates that long-distance dispersal and repeated habitat transitions helped build the pantropical distribution of Xylopia.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A time-calibrated phylogenetic analysis indicates that the pantropical distribution of the magnoliid genus <i>Xylopia</i> was built through long-distance dispersal among major tropical regions and repeated transitions into drier, inundated and ultramafic environments.</p>
<p>The study analyzed 168 of 191 recognized species, representing 88% of the genus. Researchers combined a species-level phylogeny with curated occurrence records, ancestral-area models, habitat reconstructions, quantitative climatic analyses and spatial measures of phylogenetic diversity and endemism. The analysis covered 51 tropical islands and sampled 36% of the phylogeny’s species as island inhabitants.</p>
<p>The crown age of <i>Xylopia</i> was estimated at 31.8 million years ago, with a 95% confidence interval of 22.6–41.02 million years. Its earliest ancestral area remained equivocal: Africa plus South and Southeast Asia had a model probability of 0.49, while Africa plus Australia and New Guinea had a probability of 0.46. Africa was reconstructed with high support as the ancestral area of the core clade.</p>
<p>Two middle-Miocene movements out of Africa were inferred. One lineage dispersed to South America at about 11.6 million years ago and diversified rapidly into three clades. Another reached the Asia-Pacific region. Six later dispersals from South America to Central America were identified. The timing and absence of relevant land bridges implicated overwater dispersal in the Africa–South America movement, but the study did not establish the specific transport mechanism.</p>
<p>Islands were major destinations for the genus. Forty of 59 island species met the study’s narrow-range endemic criterion, based on an extent-of-occurrence estimate below 20,000 km². Island size was positively associated with total species richness (r = 0.77; 95% CI 0.62–0.86) and endemic species richness (r = 0.57; 95% CI 0.35–0.73), while isolation was not correlated with either measure.</p>
<p>Biogeographic stochastic mapping attributed 89.8% of 167 reconstructed events to in situ speciation within regions, compared with 12% to dispersal and 2.4% to vicariance. Africa was the leading source of between-region dispersal, followed by South America and Australia–New Guinea. Central America, Madagascar and the Pacific were major sinks. The authors interpreted this pattern as evidence that uncommon intercontinental movement combined with repeated within-region diversification shaped the genus’s broad range.</p>
<p>Humid habitat was estimated as the most likely ancestral state, while <i>Xylopia</i> sect. Ancistropetala was reconstructed as subhumid. Of 59 species in subhumid habitats, 42 were Afrotropical, nine Asia-Pacific and eight Neotropical. Climatic reconstructions identified nine shifts toward lower mean annual precipitation and ten toward lower precipitation in the driest quarter. All occurred within the last 14 million years, and most within the last 10 million years.</p>
<p>Transitions onto ultramafic substrates occurred repeatedly during the last 10 million years, chiefly in the Asia-Pacific region but also in Cuba and Madagascar. Three clades radiated after entering these environments, and all ultramafic species occurred on islands. Facultative and obligate ultramafic species were evenly divided between humid and subhumid climatic regimes.</p>
<p>Spatial analyses found high phylogenetic diversity in western and central Africa, Madagascar, Southeast Asia and parts of western South America. Phylogenetic and weighted endemism were highest in Madagascar and Jamaica, with moderate values in several other regions. The authors noted that grid-based metrics may miss narrowly endemic species, while occurrence data remain subject to uneven sampling. Broader sampling within Annonoideae may help resolve the ambiguity surrounding the genus’s earliest ancestral area, but the ancestral reconstruction remains limited by the available data.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Biogeographic and ecological evolution of the pantropical flowering-plant genus Xylopia</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> ﻿Long-distance dispersals and ecological transitions underlie the biogeographic expansion of the pantropical magnoliid genus Xylopia ( Annonaceae )</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Johnson, D. M., Nge, F. J., Stull, G., Murray, N. A., Floyd, K., Streiff, S., Rodrigues-Vaz, C., Soulé, V. R. C., &amp; Couvreur, T. L. P. (2025). Long-distance dispersals and ecological transitions underlie the biogeographic expansion of the pantropical magnoliid genus Xylopia (Annonaceae). <em>Frontiers of Biogeography, 18</em>, Article e159992. <a href="https://doi.org/10.21425/fob.18.159992" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.21425/fob.18.159992</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.21425/fob.18.159992" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.21425/fob.18.159992</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Xylopia, plant biogeography, long-distance dispersal, phylogenetics, ancestral-area reconstruction, habitat transitions, ultramafic ecosystems, island colonization, phylogenetic diversity, Annonaceae, Long-distance, dispersals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">327755</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rare Italian Forest Herb Defies Expectations With Surprising Genetic Resilience and Adaptive Leaf Traits</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/rare-italian-forest-herb-defies-expectations-with-surprising-genetic-resilience-and-adaptive-leaf-traits/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 21:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adaptive leaf traits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aegonychon calabrum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AFLP fingerprinting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSR strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directional selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divergence in endemic plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endemic plant species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evolutionary ecology of plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetic diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic resilience of rare species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leaf traits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediterranean forest plant diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediterranean forests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[niche conservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phenotypic flexibility in herbs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant biogeography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant conservation genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant endemism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant genetic diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant trait variation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PST-FST comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rare Italian forest herb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[understory herbs]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=198808</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study of the rare Italian endemic herb Aegonychon calabrum and its widespread congener reveals unexpectedly high genetic diversity, comparable phenotypic flexibility and evidence of directional selection on leaf traits.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deep in the mountain forests of southern Italy, a rare blue-flowered herb has been quietly rewriting what scientists think they know about plant rarity. Aegonychon calabrum, a perennial understory herb restricted to a handful of sites in the southern Apennines, has long been assumed to be a fragile specialist, genetically impoverished and evolutionarily frozen in place. A new study comparing it with its widespread relative Aegonychon purpurocaeruleum reveals a very different picture: the endemic species harbors nearly as much genetic diversity as its common congener, displays comparable phenotypic flexibility, and appears to be under active directional or divergent selection on its leaf traits rather than the stabilizing selection typically expected of narrow endemics.</p>
<p>The research, published in Plant Biosystems by a team led by Andrea Coppi and Federico Selvi of the University of Florence together with colleagues from Camerino, Sassari, Basilicata and Palermo, tackled a long-standing question in plant biogeography and evolutionary ecology: do endemic species differ from widespread congeners in the range and patterns of their functional trait variation and genetic structure? While many studies have examined the genetics of rare plants, little is known about how intraspecific variation in functional traits relates to genetic variation in narrow Mediterranean forest endemics, particularly when compared against close relatives occupying similar habitats.</p>
<p>The two species form an ideal natural experiment. Aegonychon calabrum is confined to a few mountain localities in Calabria and one outlier population in Campania, growing in mixed holm oak-broadleaf or Calabrian pine forests up to 1400 meters above sea level. Aegonychon purpurocaeruleum, by contrast, ranges across most of southern Europe eastwards to Iran and is found throughout most of Italy. Both are perennial hemicryptophytic herbs of the forest understory with similar growth habits, showy blue or purple flowers pollinated by long-tongued insects, and the ability to spread vegetatively through creeping sterile stems. Both are diploid, though with different chromosome numbers, and no hybrids are known between them, indicating effective reproductive barriers.</p>
<p>The researchers sampled three populations of the endemic and seven populations of the widespread species, the latter spanning the entire latitudinal gradient of Italy from Lake Garda in the north to Sicily in the south. At each site, leaves were collected from ten fully developed individuals spaced at least ten meters apart to avoid sampling clones of the same plant. Two leaves per individual were used for trait measurements and a third was dried in silica gel for genetic analysis. The team measured three core leaf traits: leaf area, specific leaf area, and leaf dry matter content, which together convey key information about how plants acquire and conserve resources.</p>
<p>The trait results told a nuanced story. Leaf area was significantly lower in the endemic species, supporting the idea that A. calabrum has a more resource-conservative strategy than its widespread relative, consistent with a recent broader study of Mediterranean forest endemics. However, and unexpectedly, the overall amount of intraspecific variation in the three traits was comparable between the species, and in some cases even slightly wider in the endemic, despite the fact that the widespread species was sampled across a far broader range of climatic conditions. Within the endemic, the southern high-elevation population on siliceous substrate showed more resource-acquisitive traits, while the two northern populations on warm calcareous sites exhibited smaller leaves and lower specific leaf area, traits associated with tolerance of drought and nutrient limitation.</p>
<p>When the researchers translated the leaf measurements into Grime&#8217;s CSR ecological strategies, which describe trade-offs between competitive ability, stress tolerance and ruderality, they found that species identity explained almost none of the variation. Instead, population effects accounted for between 52 and 81 percent of the variation in the three strategy scores. The endemic&#8217;s populations ranged from predominantly stress-tolerant to ruderal, mirroring the spread seen in the widespread species. This lack of clear divergence in ecological strategies suggests that A. calabrum fits the so-called refuge model of endemism, in which narrow distribution reflects stress tolerance and low competitive ability in marginal habitats, rather than the specialist model, in which rarity stems from tight adaptation to a narrowly defined environment.</p>
<p>The genetic analysis, based on AFLP fingerprinting of 94 individuals producing 181 loci, delivered perhaps the most surprising findings. Analysis of molecular variance showed that the vast majority of genetic variation occurs within populations in both species, and mean expected heterozygosity was only slightly lower in the endemic (0.295 versus 0.311). This runs counter to the common expectation that rare, fragmented species suffer genetic erosion. Differentiation among populations was actually lower in the endemic than in the widespread species, and a discriminant analysis of principal components confirmed a clear genetic separation between the two species, with the endemic defined almost exclusively by two unique genetic clusters. Only about five percent of loci were flagged as candidates under selection, pointing to a similarly low impact of adaptive divergence at the genome level in both species.</p>
<p>The pivotal insight came from comparing phenotypic differentiation among populations with neutral genetic differentiation. In both species, phenotypic differentiation in leaf traits substantially exceeded genetic differentiation, a pattern indicating that directional or divergent selection, rather than random genetic drift, is shaping population differences in leaf form and function. The magnitude of the gap between the two measures was far greater than averages reported in meta-analyses of plant populations, reinforcing the conclusion that selection is a powerful force in both the rare and the common species. The authors note that this result held even under conservative assumptions about the additive genetic basis of the traits, making the signature of selection difficult to dismiss as a methodological artifact.</p>
<p>The study also probed whether genetically similar populations share similar trait values, a population-level version of niche conservatism. A significant positive correlation between trait similarity and genetic proximity emerged only for leaf area, and a local autocorrelation analysis revealed that the two northern populations of the endemic, which occupy similar habitats, form a clade with significantly similar trait values. This pattern suggests that shared ancestry and limited environmental divergence, rather than random processes alone, help maintain trait similarity among genetically close populations, even as other forces push populations apart phenotypically.</p>
<p>Taken together, the findings paint the rare Aegonychon calabrum as anything but an evolutionary dead end. Its populations combine substantial genetic diversity, considerable phenotypic plasticity and evidence of ongoing selection, suggesting a real capacity to adapt to changing habitat conditions. For conservation biologists, the message is that narrow range does not necessarily mean genetic fragility, and that Mediterranean forest endemics may harbor hidden adaptive potential. The authors call for future work using genome-wide sequencing approaches such as ddRADseq and genome-wide association studies to characterize genomic variation in endemic and widespread species pairs more comprehensively, opening the way to a deeper understanding of how rarity and adaptability coexist in the plant world.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Leaf trait variation, genetic structure and selection in a narrow Mediterranean forest endemic plant compared with its widespread congener</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Are leaf traits and genetic differentiation patterns divergent in endemic vs widespread congeneric plant species? Insights from the Mediterranean forest species pair Aegonychon calabrum-A. purpurocaeruleum (Boraginaceae)</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Coppi, A., Santini, G., Canullo, R., Carrari, E., Chelli, S., Farris, E., Gasperini, C., Rosati, L., Santi, I., Bajona, E., Campetella, G., &amp; Selvi, F. (2026). Are leaf traits and genetic differentiation patterns divergent in endemic vs widespread congeneric plant species? Insights from the Mediterranean forest species pair Aegonychon calabrum-A. purpurocaeruleum (Boraginaceae). <em>Plant Biosystems, 160</em>(5), Article 252. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44473-026-00254-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44473-026-00254-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44473-026-00254-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44473-026-00254-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Aegonychon calabrum, plant endemism, leaf traits, AFLP fingerprinting, genetic diversity, Mediterranean forests, niche conservatism, PST-FST comparison, CSR strategies, population genetics, directional selection, understory herbs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">198808</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
