<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>plant-based meat &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/plant-based-meat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 18:40:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>MRI Reveals Hidden Architecture Inside Plant-Based Meat</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/mri-reveals-hidden-architecture-inside-plant-based-meat/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 18:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced imaging in food engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anisotropic layered food textures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anisotropy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEST]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confocal microscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooling die geometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diffusion tensor imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extruded plant protein microstructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food processing and structural hierarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food science research on plant-based meats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food structure visualization techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-moisture extrusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-moisture extrusion process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic resonance imaging in food science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meat-like texture development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pH-shifting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant protein texture formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-based meat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-based meat structure analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soy protein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soy protein fiber hierarchy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=218170</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dutch researchers used diffusion tensor and CEST MRI to reveal how soy protein extrudates build their meat-like fibrous hierarchy across length scales from 100 nanometres to hundreds of micrometres.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fibrous, meat-like bite of a plant-based burger is not an accident of chemistry but the product of an elaborate structural hierarchy that has, until now, been largely invisible to food scientists. In a study published in Current Research in Food Science, a team of Dutch researchers led by Sam Kuijpers and Camilla Terenzi has turned to magnetic resonance imaging, the same family of techniques used to map the human brain, to peer inside high-moisture extrudates made from soy protein concentrate. Their work reveals, for the first time in a single coherent framework, how structures at scales spanning from a tenth of a micrometre to hundreds of micrometres conspire to produce the anisotropic, layered texture that makes extruded plant protein feel like meat on the palate.</p>
<p>High-moisture extrusion is the industrial workhorse behind most plant-based meat alternatives. A protein dough, typically derived from soy or pea isolates, is hydrated, mixed and then pushed through a heated barrel where temperatures reach 135 degrees Celsius and intense shear forces from co-rotating screws knead the material. The molten protein then passes through a cooling die, where it solidifies into a ribbon with a lamellar, fibrous structure reminiscent of muscle tissue. The critical question has always been how this hierarchical anisotropy forms: which processes happen in the barrel, which in the cooling die, and how events at the nanometre scale cascade upward to determine the texture a consumer actually perceives when chewing.</p>
<p>To answer this, the researchers deployed an unusually broad arsenal of magnetic resonance methods. T2-weighted MRI at 14 tesla visualised the phase-separated architecture, distinguishing protein-rich domains from water-rich lamellae at the hundred-micrometre scale. Diffusion tensor MRI, a technique borrowed from clinical neuroimaging where it maps white matter tracts, was used to measure the directionality of water self-diffusion within each voxel, revealing the orientation of structures far below the imaging resolution. Chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI, performed at the extraordinary field strength of 28.2 tesla, probed the chemical composition of the two phases, detecting mobile proteins dissolved in the water-rich regions through their amide and relayed nuclear Overhauser enhancement signatures.</p>
<p>The team extruded commercial soy protein concentrate at 60 percent moisture and shifted the pH of the feed liquid to three values: acidic pH 5.0, near the isoelectric point of the protein; neutral pH 7.0; and alkaline pH 7.8. The results were striking. At neutral and alkaline pH, the extrudates displayed beautifully aligned lamellar structures running parallel to the extrusion direction, with weighted order parameters reaching 0.9 in sagittal views. At pH 5.0, by contrast, the macroscopic lamellar order collapsed almost entirely, with order parameters dropping to around 0.4 and no uniform aligned phase separation visible along the flow direction.</p>
<p>Yet the story at smaller length scales was inverted. Confocal laser scanning microscopy, capable of resolving features down to roughly 100 nanometres, showed that the acidic sample actually possessed a well-aligned fibrillar protein network at the sub-micrometre scale, with order parameters around 0.6, comparable to the neutral sample. The alkaline sample, meanwhile, lacked this fine-scale fibrillar alignment altogether, a consequence of strong electrostatic repulsion between highly charged protein fibrils far from their isoelectric point. This decoupling between order at different scales provided the central clue to the mechanism of structure formation.</p>
<p>The diffusion tensor measurements added quantitative weight to this picture. In the protein-rich lamellae of the pH 7.0 sample, water diffused preferentially along the extrusion direction, the fastest diffusion direction coinciding with the shear imposed by the extruder screws, while the slowest diffusion ran perpendicular to the lamellae. Fractional anisotropy values of about 0.3 in the protein-rich phase, against 0.2 in the water-rich phase, confirmed that the aligned protein fibrils observed microscopically were genuinely hindering water motion in a directional manner. Because the diffusion encoding time of 50 milliseconds probes water displacement over roughly 9 to 33 micrometres, the technique effectively senses the cumulative effect of countless sub-micrometre fibrils, bridging the gap between what microscopy and conventional MRI can each see.</p>
<p>To understand why the cooling die geometry matters, the researchers generated synthetic axial MRI images mimicking lamellar patterns for four die cross-sections: elliptical, bullnose, rounded-rectangle and sharp-cornered rectangular. The rotated Fourier transform analysis, a recently developed image-processing method that extracts orientational order from two-dimensional images, showed that elliptical dies produce highly homogeneous order parameters near 0.93, while progressively sharper corners carve out increasingly wide zones of disorder, with order parameters falling to 0.3 in the corners of the sharpest geometry. The experimental maps of real extrudates matched the sharp-cornered simulation almost exactly, with a disordered corner region roughly 1.5 millimetres wide, demonstrating that the die&#8217;s shape directly imprints its geometry onto the internal texture of the product.</p>
<p>Synthesising these observations, the authors propose a two-stage mechanism. Fibril formation and alignment at the sub-micrometre scale begin already in the extruder barrel and transition zone. The degree of this fine-scale alignment, governed by pH through electrostatic screening, then controls the rheology of the protein melt entering the cooling die. At pH 5.0, the strongly aligned fibrillar network raises the yield stress so much that the melt can no longer flow in laminar sheets through the die, and the macroscopic lamellar structure fails to form. At pH 7.8, weak fibril alignment keeps the yield stress low, allowing coarse lamellae to form but without the underlying fibrillar backbone. Only at an intermediate pH, where fibrillar alignment and electrostatic repulsion strike a balance, do both levels of hierarchy emerge in concert. As a compelling validation of the method&#8217;s specificity, the team showed that commercial high-moisture mozzarella, whose casein structure is aligned only by stretching at much lower temperatures, exhibits order at the hundred-micrometre scale but no diffusional anisotropy at smaller scales, consistent with small-angle neutron scattering showing isotropy below 90 nanometres.</p>
<p>The implications reach well beyond academic curiosity. Plant-based meat alternatives are a cornerstone of the protein transition, yet their texture remains the chief barrier to consumer acceptance. By establishing high-resolution MRI, diffusion tensor imaging and CEST as a versatile, non-destructive toolkit for quantifying hierarchical anisotropy in intact extrudates, the study gives food engineers, for the first time, a way to watch structure form across six orders of magnitude in length scale and to rationally tune pH, die geometry and processing conditions. The work was funded by the Dutch Research Council together with industrial partners including Unilever, Cargill, dsm-firmenich and FrieslandCampina, underscoring the commercial stakes. If the meat-like fibrousness of the next generation of plant-based products improves noticeably, it may well be because a scanner originally built for brains taught manufacturers how to build better fibres.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Magnetic resonance imaging of hierarchical anisotropic structure formation in high-moisture soy protein extrudates</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Underpinning hierarchical anisotropic structure formation in soy protein high-moisture extrudates by Magnetic Resonance Imaging</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kuijpers, S. A., Gobes, M. I., Mayar, M., Vergeldt, F. J., Hohlbein, J., Huppertz, T., van Duynhoven, J. P., &amp; Terenzi, C. (2026). Underpinning hierarchical anisotropic structure formation in soy protein high-moisture extrudates by Magnetic Resonance Imaging. <em>Current Research in Food Science, 13</em>, Article 101575. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2026.101575" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2026.101575</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> plant-based meat, high-moisture extrusion, soy protein, MRI, diffusion tensor imaging, CEST, food structure, anisotropy, pH-shifting, cooling die geometry, confocal microscopy, food science</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">218170</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Nanoscale Probes to the Dinner Plate: New Model Predicts Meat Texture From Single Myofibrils</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/from-nanoscale-probes-to-the-dinner-plate-new-model-predicts-meat-texture-from-single-myofibrils/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 21:11:12 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atomic force microscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atomic force microscopy in food science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collagen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compression mechanics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connective tissue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutive models]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of cooking on meat texture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Texture Analysis Techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hierarchical muscle structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative methods in meat science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meat tenderness and chewiness factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meat texture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meat texture prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiscale mechanical modeling of meat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multiscale modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[muscle fiber and connective tissue properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myofibril stiffness measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[myofibrils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoindentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoscale muscle protein analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-based meat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reuss model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structure-property relationships in meat]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=214546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers used atomic force microscopy and a multiscale mechanical model to predict the compressive texture of pork, beef, and chicken from the stiffness of individual myofibrils and connective tissues.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does a bite of pork tenderloin feel firmer than a piece of chicken breast, and why does cooking turn all of them tougher? For decades, food scientists have answered such questions with blunt instruments: compressing cubes of meat in a texture analyzer or asking trained sensory panels to score tenderness and chewiness. These methods describe what we feel, but they say little about where that feeling physically comes from. A new study published in Current Research in Food Science takes a radically different approach, working from the bottom up. By poking individual muscle proteins with an atomic force microscope and feeding the results into a multiscale mechanical model, researchers show that the texture of a whole piece of meat can be predicted from the stiffness of structures thousands of times smaller than a grain of salt.</p>
<p>Muscle is a hierarchical composite material, and that architecture is the key to the new framework. At the smallest level sit myofibrils, the contractile protein threads built from repeating sarcomeres, each containing Z-disks, A-bands, and H-bands. Myofibrils bundle together into muscle fibers, wrapped in a thin collagenous sheath called the endomysium. Fibers in turn group into bundles encased in a thicker connective tissue layer, the perimysium. Connective tissues form a continuous network that reinforces the muscle and transmits force between fibers and bundles. Because each level contributes to the whole, the team hypothesized that macroscopic texture could be quantitatively predicted if the mechanical properties of the microscopic components and their volume fractions were known.</p>
<p>Testing that hypothesis required measuring mechanics at scales where no conventional test can operate. The researchers turned to atomic force microscopy, or AFM, a technique in which an ultrasharp silicon nitride tip, with a radius of just a few nanometers, is pressed against a sample while the force of contact is recorded. Fitting the resulting force-indentation curves with the Derjaguin-Muller-Toporov contact model, which accounts for both elastic deformation and van der Waals adhesion, yields the local Young&#8217;s modulus. The team applied this to myofibrils isolated from pork tenderloin, beef tenderloin, and chicken breast, as well as to extracted endomysium and perimysium, measuring both dried and hydrated samples. Hydration mattered enormously: dried myofibrils showed moduli in the gigapascal range, while wet samples dropped by one to two orders of magnitude into the tens of megapascals, a reminder that data from dried biological materials can have limited relevance to real food.</p>
<p>The nanoscale maps revealed striking patterns. In raw myofibrils, stiffness followed a consistent spatial order across all three species: the Z-disk was stiffest, the A-band intermediate, and the H-band softest, echoing earlier AFM studies on rabbit and rat muscle. Species differences were also clear. In the hydrated raw state, pork myofibrils were the stiffest at roughly 50 megapascals, beef followed at about 47, and chicken was softest at around 34. Cooking reshuffled the dried-state landscape, erasing the species-specific sarcomere structures as proteins denatured and aggregated, but the wet cooked myofibrils preserved the same hierarchy, with pork highest at about 75 megapascals and chicken lowest at about 45. The collagenous membranes told their own story: the perimysium was consistently slightly stiffer than the endomysium, and both stiffened after cooking, likely through heat-induced collagen denaturation and aggregation.</p>
<p>With the microscopic inputs in hand, the team built a two-level analytical model based on the classical Reuss series scheme from composite mechanics. Under transverse compression, a single muscle fiber was treated as myofibrils embedded in an endomysium matrix, and a fiber bundle as equivalent fibers in series with the perimysium. The effective modulus of each level is the volume-fraction-weighted combination of its phases, with the phase fractions measured from scanning electron microscope images of fiber cross-sections. Running the numbers, the model predicted bundle moduli that ranked pork highest, beef intermediate, and chicken lowest, and predicted a significant increase after cooking, trends that mirror the myofibril data feeding into it. Notably, the predicted bundle modulus correlated strongly with the myofibril and endomysium moduli but not with the perimysium modulus, suggesting that in this low-connective-tissue muscle system, the bundle stiffness is governed primarily by the fibers themselves.</p>
<p>The validation step came from macroscopic compression tests on cubes of raw and cooked meat using a texture analyzer, with the compression axis carefully aligned perpendicular to the muscle fibers to match the orientation of the nanoscale measurements. The stress-strain curves were strongly nonlinear, stiffening as strain increased, so the team fitted them with two constitutive models. A combined logarithmic-polynomial hyperelastic model, originally developed for liver tissue, captured the general shape but showed systematic deviations, particularly for chicken. A logistic model, adapted from work on passive spinal muscle mechanics, performed far better, with coefficients of determination above 0.997 for every sample. Its parameters carried clear physical meaning: an initial modulus reflecting the relaxed response of the microscopic components, a hardening increment describing nonlinear stiffening, a hardening rate, and a critical strain at which stiffening accelerates.</p>
<p>The correlation analysis tied the scales together. The logistic model&#8217;s initial modulus correlated strongly with the linear modulus measured from the first five percent of strain, and both correlated with the multiscale model&#8217;s predicted bundle modulus and, through it, with the myofibril and endomysium properties. In other words, the initial stiffness of a piece of meat is largely written into its myofibrils. The nonlinear parameters told a different story. Beef showed the largest hardening increment, which the authors attribute to its denser network of mature collagen crosslinks and the pronounced nonlinear hardening behavior of the perimysium observed in the AFM force curves, potentially explaining why beef is chewier than pork or chicken. Bound water content correlated positively with the initial stiffness parameters, while free water correlated negatively with the hardening rate, hinting that water acts as a lubricant that smooths the structural response under compression.</p>
<p>The authors are careful about scope. The AFM-derived moduli of the isolated connective tissues represent effective properties of collagen-rich fractions rather than absolute in situ values, and the constitutive models describe rate-independent behavior at a single loading speed rather than the full viscoelastic response of muscle. Validation was performed on three relatively lean, low-connective-tissue muscles, so extending the framework to collagen-rich cuts such as tendon-laden muscles remains future work. The link between micro- and macroscale is also framed as a parametric correlation rather than a direct numerical equivalence, with microscopic stiffness serving as the physical foundation for macroscopic structural stiffness rather than substituting for it one-to-one.</p>
<p>Even with those caveats, the implications are broad. The study delivers a quantitative, bottom-up route from nanoscale protein mechanics to the texture a consumer actually perceives, clarifying which hierarchical structures dominate which aspects of the mechanical response. For the booming plant-based meat industry, where replicating the fibrous architecture and anisotropic mechanics of real muscle remains the central challenge, the framework offers something like a design blueprint: a way to specify the stiffness and volume fraction of the protein and matrix phases needed to hit a target bite. More broadly, it demonstrates that with enough care at the nanoscale, even something as familiar and complex as the texture of dinner can be reduced to physics you can measure, model, and ultimately engineer.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Multiscale mechanical modeling linking AFM nanomechanics of myofibrils and connective tissue to the macroscopic compressive texture of meat</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Predicting the compression mechanical properties of muscle from microscale indentation mechanics using multiscale mechanical models</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Zhao, C., Jiang, R., Zhang, Z., Jia, J., Nishinari, K., &amp; Yang, N. (2026). Predicting the compression mechanical properties of muscle from microscale indentation mechanics using multiscale mechanical models. <em>Current Research in Food Science</em>, Article 101577. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2026.101577" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2026.101577</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2026.101577" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.crfs.2026.101577</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> meat texture, atomic force microscopy, myofibrils, multiscale modeling, connective tissue, food science, compression mechanics, plant-based meat, collagen, constitutive models, Reuss model, nanoindentation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">214546</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
