<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>phytochemical-mediated &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/phytochemical-mediated/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 21:12:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Plant compounds inhibit P. aeruginosa efflux pumps and biofilms in vitro</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/plant-compounds-inhibit-p-aeruginosa-efflux-pumps-and-biofilms-in-vitro/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 21:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antimicrobial Resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofilm biomass reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofilm formation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efflux pump activity assays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efflux pump inhibition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efflux pump inhibition in bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evaluation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fluorescence-based bacterial dye accumulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in vitro bacterial resistance studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inhibition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laboratory assays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural antimicrobial agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[P. aeruginosa resistance mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PAO1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phytochemical-mediated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phytochemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phytochemicals as antibiotic adjuvants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant compounds targeting bacterial biofilms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant-derived phytochemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudomonas aeruginosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm inhibition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[qRT-PCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salvianolic Acid A]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salvianolic acid A antibacterial activity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=330619</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An in vitro study found that five plant compounds impaired efflux-pump activity and reduced P. aeruginosa PAO1 biofilm formation, with salvianolic acid A producing the strongest effects.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Five plant-derived phytochemicals reduced biofilm formation and impaired efflux-pump activity in laboratory tests involving Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, according to the 2026 study. Mirificin, forsythoside A, salvianolic acid A, epigallocatechin gallate and epicatechin gallate produced dose-dependent inhibition of biofilm formation, with more than 75% reduction in biofilm biomass at the higher treatment concentrations tested. The compounds also significantly increased intracellular accumulation of ethidium bromide and Hoechst dye, a result interpreted by the researchers as evidence of reduced efflux-pump activity.</p>
<p>Salvianolic acid A produced the strongest inhibition among the phytochemicals examined, reaching activity comparable to the positive-control efflux-pump inhibitor PAβN at 100 µM. The investigation was an in vitro laboratory study of a single bacterial strain, not a trial in people or animals. Its methods combined biofilm-inhibition assays with fluorescence-based efflux measurements, advanced imaging and quantitative reverse-transcription PCR, or qRT-PCR.</p>
<p>The fluorescence assays used ethidium bromide, N-phenyl-1-naphthylamine and Hoechst dye to assess compound accumulation in relation to efflux-pump function. The researchers evaluated the phytochemicals as potential efflux-pump inhibitors and antibiotic adjuvants, substances that could enhance antimicrobial activity by limiting a bacterial mechanism associated with resistance. Treatment with the tested compounds significantly increased the amount of ethidium bromide and Hoechst dye retained within the bacterial cells.</p>
<p>Salvianolic acid A at 100 µM showed the highest inhibitory activity in this assessment and was comparable to PAβN. These observations came from controlled laboratory assays rather than from an infection model or a study of treatment outcomes. The results therefore show that the compounds can inhibit relevant pump-associated activity under the tested conditions, but they do not establish that the phytochemicals improve antibiotic efficacy in patients, resolve infections or replace conventional antimicrobial treatment.</p>
<p>Gene-expression analysis supplied an additional level of evidence. Following treatment with salvianolic acid A, qRT-PCR detected significant downregulation of the efflux-pump genes mexA , mexB and oprM . The same treatment significantly reduced expression of the quorum-sensing genes rhlI and rhlR .</p>
<p>The researchers interpreted these transcriptional changes as confirmation of the efflux-pump inhibitory activity observed in the laboratory assays. The qRT-PCR findings and the dye-accumulation measurements were separate components of the study; the report does not establish that the imaging results were caused by changes in the expression of these particular genes. Among the five phytochemicals, salvianolic acid A emerged as the leading candidate in this set because it combined the highest measured efflux-pump inhibition with significant downregulation of pump-associated genes.</p>
<p>The scope remains limited to in vitro testing of PAO1 with selected compounds and specific laboratory endpoints. The study’s data are available upon reasonable request.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> In vitro testing of plant-derived efflux-pump inhibitors against Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Evaluation of phytochemical-mediated inhibition of the efflux pump in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Sarmah, A., Kumar, A., Selvaraj, A. A., Rameshkumar, N., Rani, R., Wilson Santhosh Kumar, A., &amp; Ravichandran, V. (2026). Evaluation of phytochemical-mediated inhibition of the efflux pump in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. <em>Molecular Biology Reports, 53</em>(1), Article 1479. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-026-12660-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-026-12660-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-026-12660-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11033-026-12660-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Pseudomonas aeruginosa, PAO1, efflux-pump inhibition, salvianolic acid A, phytochemicals, biofilm formation, antimicrobial resistance, qRT-PCR, laboratory assays, Evaluation, phytochemical-mediated, inhibition</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">330619</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
