<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>phage-based biocontrol for crop diseases &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/phage-based-biocontrol-for-crop-diseases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 14:14:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Viruses Armed With Calcium Shield Crops From Fire Blight and Black Rot</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/viruses-armed-with-calcium-shield-crops-from-fire-blight-and-black-rot/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 14:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[addressing antibiotic resistance in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternatives to chemical pesticides in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacteriophage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacteriophage stability on plant surfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biocontrol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biocontrol of fire blight and black rot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biopesticide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[black rot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[calcium carbonate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[combating copper resistance in plant pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development of field-ready phage sprays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly crop disease management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erwinia amylovora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire blight]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial biotechnology in plant disease control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phage stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phage survival under sunlight and storage conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phage-based biocontrol for crop diseases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant pathology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reducing pesticide environmental impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UV photoprotection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viruses targeting plant pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xanthomonas campestris]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=195231</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have designed a bacteriophage-based biocontrol product with room-temperature stability and calcium carbonate photoprotection that sustains viral activity on pear and cabbage surfaces against the fire blight and black rot pathogens.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bacteriophages, the viruses that hunt and kill bacteria, are edging closer to becoming practical weapons against two of the world&#8217;s most damaging crop diseases. In a new study published in Microbial Biotechnology, researchers report the systematic design of a phage-based biocontrol product that targets the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora and the black rot pathogen Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris, two bacteria ranked among the ten most significant plant pathogens worldwide. The work tackles the gap that has long kept laboratory phage successes from translating into field-ready sprays: survival of the viruses on plant surfaces under real sunlight, and stability during storage long enough for commercial distribution.</p>
<p>The case for alternatives to conventional treatments is pressing. Chemical pesticides, although effective and easy to manufacture, contaminate soil, leach toxic compounds into groundwater and disrupt beneficial microbial communities that naturally suppress pathogens. Copper compounds, a mainstay of orchard sprays, accumulate in the environment, and copper resistance in target bacteria has steadily eroded their value. Antibiotics have fared little better: the global rise of antibiotic resistance and risks to human health have limited agricultural use, and resistance development in phytopathogens undermines long-term efficacy. Concerns extend to pollinators as well, since pesticide exposure and habitat contamination threaten the honeybees on which fruit, nut and oilseed yields depend. Within the European Union, most conventional pesticides and antibiotics are progressively being banned, leaving farmers in urgent need of new tools.</p>
<p>Phages offer an attractive answer because of their exquisite host specificity. They infect and lyse their target bacteria without touching beneficial microorganisms, plants, animals or humans, so applications are not expected to disturb plant or soil microbiota. They also replicate only when sufficient susceptible hosts are present, naturally declining once pathogen populations fall. The team behind the new work built on three virulent phages previously isolated from urban wastewater: ɸEF1 and ɸEF2, which attack E. amylovora, and ɸXF1, which attacks X. campestris. Genomic analysis confirmed that all three follow a strictly lytic cycle, producing transparent plaques and complete host lysis in liquid culture within five to eight hours.</p>
<p>The first task was optimizing infection dynamics. Testing multiplicities of infection (MOI) ranging from 0.01 to 10, the researchers found that higher MOIs offered no significant improvement in pathogen reduction. A MOI of 1 was selected because it produced greater reductions in bacterial density than 0.1 for all three phages. From a manufacturing perspective this matters enormously: low MOIs allow a single concentrated phage stock to be diluted into large-volume formulations, whereas MOIs of 100 or 1000 would require titers of 10^10 to 10^11 plaque-forming units per milliliter, inflating production complexity and cost. Host density also influenced performance, with better bacterial reductions at 10^6 colony-forming units per milliliter than at 10^7. Under the optimized conditions, ɸXF1 delivered the strongest lysis, a 5.5 log10 reduction in host density within four hours, while ɸEF1 and ɸEF2 achieved reductions of 3.5 and 3.8 log10 respectively, with their combined use potentially acting synergistically.</p>
<p>Shelf life was the next hurdle. The phages were stored at 4°C, 20°C and 37°C for six months and enumerated at regular intervals. Both ɸEF1 and ɸEF2 remained stable for the full 180 days at 4°C, with losses close to or below 1 log10 unit, and performed acceptably at 20°C with roughly 2 log10 reductions. At 37°C, however, both declined sharply, falling 8 log10 units by day 150. Phage ɸXF1 was somewhat more fragile, losing about 2 log10 units at 4°C and 3 log10 at 20°C over six months, and becoming undetectable within 28 days at 37°C. Notably, the study is among the first to demonstrate long-term stability of phage formulations at room temperature, a finding with substantial logistical value because it could eliminate the need for costly cold chains or freeze-drying, both of which complicate distribution and can reduce infectious particle counts.</p>
<p>Acidity proved a hard limit. All three phages were inactivated within a single day at pH 3, whereas at neutral and alkaline pH stability rose markedly. ɸEF2 was the sturdiest, losing less than about 1 log10 unit at both pH 7 and pH 9 over six months, while ɸEF1 declined by 1.2 log10 units and ɸXF1 dropped 2.0 log10 at pH 7 and 3.8 log10 at pH 9. These results directly inform formulation choices, since any carrier solution must avoid acidic conditions that would rapidly destroy infectivity before the product even reaches the crop.</p>
<p>The decisive challenge, however, was sunlight. Ultraviolet radiation induces DNA lesions that block phage replication and transcription, and daylight inactivation is widely regarded as the primary obstacle to phage biocontrol in the field. The researchers therefore screened three photoprotective agents already used in agriculture: aminic acid, an acidic protein hydrolysate; Amino 22%, a commercial amino acid-based biostimulant; and Vegepron Sun, a calcium carbonate (CaCO3) foliar fertilizer that forms a reflective film on fruit and leaves. Suspensions were exposed outdoors to full natural sunlight for six hours, with solar irradiance peaking above 700 watts per square meter around midday. Aminic acid failed outright: even after neutralization, phages declined within two hours and became undetectable by four, performing worse than unprotected controls. In contrast, 24 percent CaCO3 kept average reductions to just 0.73 log10 units after six hours, with AA22 providing intermediate protection.</p>
<p>Controlled irradiation under a germicidal 253.7-nanometer UV lamp confirmed the hierarchy. Unprotected phages fell below detection within one hour, but both photoprotectants extended recoverable infectivity to eight hours, and CaCO3 consistently outperformed AA22. With 24 percent CaCO3, all three phages lost only 1.2 to 1.4 log10 units after eight hours of irradiation, compared with 2 to 2.5 log10 at the 12 percent concentration, establishing that the higher formulation offered superior and more consistent shielding. The team then moved to real crop surfaces, inoculating detached pear fruits and cabbage leaves and exposing them to sunlight. Because phage recovery from plant tissue is notoriously inefficient, the group first optimized extraction, finding that homogenization in a 10 percent beef extract solution with a Stomacher blender recovered roughly 76.7 percent of inoculated phages, versus a mere 0.79 percent with phage buffer. On the plants, 24 percent CaCO3 again proved decisive: after six hours of sun exposure, ɸEF1 titers on pears averaged 1.8 log10 units higher with the additive than without, ɸEF2 gained 2.5 log10 units, and ɸXF1 on cabbage leaves showed gains of up to 1.9 log10 units at early time points, while the unprotected suspension dropped below detection within four hours.</p>
<p>The authors argue that these results, combined with the regulatory status of the additives, clear a practical path to commercialization. Because CaCO3 and AA22 are already approved agricultural biostimulants, incorporating them into phage products should face fewer regulatory barriers than novel excipients. Recommended deployment would favor evening spraying to maximize the protective window, with reapplication every five to seven days during high-risk periods or after heavy rainfall, all compatible with Integrated Pest Management frameworks. Only a handful of commercial phage products currently exist for plant disease, including Erwiphage PLUS against fire blight and Biolyse against Xanthomonas in Europe, and Ecofire and AgriPhage elsewhere. By demonstrating room-temperature shelf stability, defined infection parameters and sunlight-protected persistence on crops, the study provides concrete formulation guidance for expanding that market, in line with European Green Deal goals for residue-free food. The researchers caution that greenhouse experiments and multi-season field trials remain necessary to validate efficacy across diverse climates, but the blueprint for a viable phage biopesticide now looks considerably more complete.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Design of a bacteriophage-based biocontrol product against the fire blight pathogen Erwinia amylovora and the black rot pathogen Xanthomonas campestris</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Design of a Bacteriophage‐Based Product for Biocontrol of Fire Blight and Black Rot</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Vique, G., Blanco‐Picazo, P., Trenchs, A., Ramos‐Barbero, M. D., Isern, M., Quirós, P., Atares, S., Salaet, I., Sala‐Comorera, L., Rodríguez‐Rubio, L., &amp; Muniesa, M. (2026). Design of a Bacteriophage‐Based Product for Biocontrol of Fire Blight and Black Rot. <em>Microbial Biotechnology, 19</em>(9), Article e70436. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.70436" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.70436</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.70436" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1111/1751-7915.70436</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> bacteriophage, biocontrol, fire blight, black rot, Erwinia amylovora, Xanthomonas campestris, calcium carbonate, UV photoprotection, plant pathology, biopesticide, phage stability, sustainable agriculture</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">195231</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
