<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PEO &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/peo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 23:40:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Mixing Secrets: How Carbon Black Distribution Shapes Solid-State Battery Performance</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/mixing-secrets-how-carbon-black-distribution-shapes-solid-state-battery-performance/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faith Mcneil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 23:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon black]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon black dispersion in solid electrolytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[challenges in solid-state battery electrode fabrication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[composite cathode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design considerations for composite cathodes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of carbon black distribution on solid-state battery longevity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electrode processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enhancing ionic conductivity in polymer electrolytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of slurry mixing on battery performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of mixing time and speed on battery efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LFP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LiTFSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium dendrites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium metal anode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methods to improve electrode slurry uniformity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimization of cathode composition in solid-state batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polymer electrolyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of conductive additives in solid electrolyte systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slurry rheology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid-state batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid-state battery electrode mixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid-state lithium-metal battery manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-ray tomography]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=260330</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers show that wet mixing time and dry mixing speed control carbon black dispersion in low-viscosity polymer slurries, dictating the microstructure, conductivity and cycle life of solid-state battery cathodes.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solid-state lithium-metal batteries have long been heralded as the successor to the lithium-ion cells that have dominated the market since 1991. By replacing the flammable organic liquid electrolyte with a solid polymer electrolyte, these batteries promise improved safety, the possibility of using a lithium metal anode with a theoretical capacity of 3860 mAh per gram compared to 372 mAh per gram for graphite, and consequently higher gravimetric and volumetric energy density. Yet a stubborn obstacle has kept them out of commercial devices: the relatively low ionic conductivity of polymer electrolytes, which is typically addressed by incorporating highly dissociated lithium salts such as LiTFSI into a poly(ethylene oxide) host. Now, a team of researchers led by L. Fernandez-Diaz and M.C. Morant-Miñana, publishing in Results in Engineering, has shown that one of the most decisive factors in solid-state battery performance is not the chemistry of the materials at all, but something far more mundane: how long and how fast the electrode slurry is mixed.</p>
<p>The composite cathode of a solid-state battery is a dense, non-porous blend of active material, conductive additive and a portion of solid electrolyte known as the catholyte. Unlike conventional lithium-ion cells, where a liquid electrolyte seeps into every pore, the solid-state version has no pore-filling liquid to rescue poor contacts. Every particle must touch its neighbour intimately, and both ions and electrons need homogeneous, percolating pathways through the electrode. The conductive additive in this study is Super C65, a carbon black from Imerys, which must form an unbroken electronic network threading through the cathode. The active material is carbon-coated lithium iron phosphate, or LFP, whose own carbon coating enhances intrinsic electronic conductivity and interfacial lithium transfer. The researchers were careful to distinguish between these two carbons: the factory-applied coating on the LFP particles and the C65 introduced during electrode processing behave very differently under the forces of mixing.</p>
<p>To isolate the effects of processing, the team prepared slurries under dry-room conditions with a dew point below minus 60 degrees Celsius, using a bead mill to first dissolve LiTFSI in acetonitrile and then mix in high molecular weight PEO to form the catholyte. The LFP and C65 powders were dry-mixed in a planetary vacuum mixer at 200, 750 or 1500 revolutions per minute, and the resulting powder blend was then wet-mixed into the catholyte for 60, 120 or 180 minutes. Five slurries were produced in total, each cast onto carbon-coated aluminium current collectors and dried under vacuum. Crucially, the researchers deliberately skipped calendering, the mechanical compaction step common in electrode manufacturing, so that the morphological fingerprints left by the mixing process itself would remain visible in the finished electrodes.</p>
<p>One of the study&#8217;s most elegant methodological contributions is the introduction of a relative viscosity parameter. Batch-to-batch variability in the PEO raw material, stemming from differences in molecular weight distribution, meant that absolute viscosity measurements could not be compared reliably across samples. By normalizing the slurry viscosity to the viscosity of the corresponding catholyte at the end of its own mixing, the team could decouple the true effects of mixing time and speed from uncontrolled fluctuations in the polymer feedstock. Validation experiments with four separate preparations, including three different PEO batches, confirmed that this normalization substantially reduced variability, offering a practical tool that other laboratories can adopt to make their slurry comparisons meaningful.</p>
<p>The rheological results revealed a counterintuitive trend. Longer wet mixing times and higher dry mixing speeds both reduced slurry viscosity, and the researchers traced this not to further polymer degradation but to the progressive deagglomeration of the carbon black. Gel permeation chromatography showed that the PEO molecular weight decreased exponentially toward a plateau, with an apparent scission-rate constant of 7.49 times ten to the minus seven per minute, but since total mixing times stayed below the point where degradation becomes negligible, the viscosity drop had to come from elsewhere. As C65 agglomerates break apart, the number of carbon particles rises, promoting immobilization of polymer chains and reducing chain entanglement, a mechanism previously described by Hoffman and colleagues. More effective deagglomeration also increases interparticle volume, allowing more solvent molecules to occupy the spaces between carbon particles and thereby lowering the suspension viscosity.</p>
<p>These rheological differences translated directly into electrode microstructure. Scanning electron microscopy of surfaces and argon ion-milled cross-sections, analysed with ImageJ, showed that longer wet mixing produced electrodes with lower porosity, higher active material loading and fewer surface lumps, because lower viscosity allows better particle rearrangement and compaction during drying. In the dry mixing series, the sample processed at 1500 rpm displayed the most homogeneous morphology, while the 200 rpm sample exhibited a highly cracked surface, suggesting that large C65 agglomerates weaken the mechanical integrity of the composite cathode and hinder uniform polymer distribution. Porosity values ranged from about 1.65 percent for the longest wet mixing time to nearly 3 percent for the mildest conditions, differences that proved consequential for transport properties.</p>
<p>Electronic and ionic conductivity measurements told a more nuanced story. Reference pellets containing as little as 5 weight percent C65 achieved electronic conductivities of roughly ten to the minus two siemens per centimetre, confirming that this modest carbon fraction is sufficient for percolation. Yet after full electrode processing, bulk electronic conductivity dropped by nearly two orders of magnitude at both 25 and 70 degrees Celsius. Wet mixing time had little effect on this bulk conductivity, but in-plane resistivity measurements revealed that excessive wet mixing stresses the carbon particles and degrades the conductive network. In the dry mixing series, the intermediate 750 rpm condition delivered the lowest interfacial resistance and the highest ionic conductivity, while the 1500 rpm sample, despite its denser packing, showed signs of carbon particles being over-stressed and unable to form an optimal network.</p>
<p>Full-cell testing in monolayer pouch cells with lithium metal anodes, cycled at 70 degrees Celsius between 2.6 and 3.7 volts, exposed the trade-offs with striking clarity. At the gentle C/20 rate, all cells delivered similar capacities between 156 and 158 mAh per gram, but at higher rates the mildest processing conditions won out: the 60-minute wet mix and the 200 rpm dry mix, both with the highest slurry viscosities and highest porosities, achieved the highest capacities at C/5. The researchers attribute this to the higher viscosity limiting conductive additive redistribution, thereby preserving a favourable electronic network, while mud cracking in the 200 rpm electrode may have created preferential channels for solid electrolyte infiltration during cycling. However, these high-capacity electrodes also showed the poorest cycle life, with the 200 rpm sample lasting only 65 cycles before coulombic efficiency fell below 98 percent, compared to 120 cycles for the balanced 750 rpm condition.</p>
<p>The degradation mechanism was revealed through X-ray computed micro-tomography of intact pouch cells, a technique that avoids the impossible task of disassembling strongly adhesive cycled cells. Cross-sections of a pristine cell showed homogeneous layers with only minor pores at the cathode-electrolyte interface, but after 130 cycles the lithium metal anode had thinned from 500 to 470 micrometres, voids had multiplied in the cathode, and dark regions appeared within the solid electrolyte layer, signatures of lithium dendrites growing from the anode through the polymer. Grain boundaries in the electrolyte, attributed to solid electrolyte interphase formed by soft dendrites, were also visible. Impedance spectroscopy of the aged cell confirmed diminished ionic diffusion, tying the loss of coulombic efficiency directly to dendrite propagation.</p>
<p>The broader lesson of this work is that in solid-state batteries, processing is not a secondary consideration but a first-order design variable. The optimal wet mixing time of 120 minutes balanced electrode compaction against preservation of the conductive network, while an intermediate dry mixing speed of 750 rpm achieved the best cyclability without compromising lithium-ion transport. Even a small amount of residual porosity, the authors suggest, may serve as stress-relief space accommodating the volume changes of lithium insertion and extraction in a mechanically rigid system. As solid-state batteries edge toward commercialization, this study demonstrates that the path to better cells may run through the mixing vessel, where the fate of every carbon black agglomerate ultimately determines whether electrons and ions can find their way home.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effect of slurry mixing parameters on carbon black distribution and performance of solid polymer electrolyte composite cathodes</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Carbon black distribution in low viscosity polymer slurries</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Carbon black distribution in low viscosity polymer slurries. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590123026043598?dgcid=rss_sd_all" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> solid-state batteries, carbon black, polymer electrolyte, slurry rheology, composite cathode, lithium metal anode, PEO, LiTFSI, electrode processing, lithium dendrites, X-ray tomography, LFP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">260330</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Graphene Oxide and Polymer Pairing Paves Way for Dendrite-Free Solid-State Lithium Batteries</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/graphene-oxide-and-polymer-pairing-paves-way-for-dendrite-free-solid-state-lithium-batteries/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Sanderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 00:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conductive Polymer Composites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cycling Stability of Solid-State Batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dendrite Prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dendrite suppression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fast-Charging Electric Vehicles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphene oxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ion Conductivity Improvement in Polymer Electrolytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ionic conductivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LiTFSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithium Dendrite Suppression Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium ion transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium metal battery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium-ion transport enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lithium-metal battery safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polymer Additives for Battery Stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polymer Electrolytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyvinylpyrrolidone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid polymer electrolyte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid-state batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid-state lithium batteries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transference number]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=193274</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have created a graphene oxide and PVP modified solid polymer electrolyte that achieves fast lithium-ion transport, high transference numbers and dendrite-free cycling in lithium metal batteries.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solid-state batteries have long been heralded as the holy grail of energy storage, promising electric vehicles that drive farther, charge faster and, crucially, catch fire far less often. Yet the materials at the heart of this revolution have stubbornly refused to cooperate. Now, a team of researchers in China reports a deceptively simple recipe that could change the calculus: by blending two inexpensive, widely available additives into a classic polymer electrolyte, they have coaxed lithium ions to move faster, deposit more evenly and survive more than a thousand hours of continuous cycling without the deadly short circuits that have plagued lithium metal batteries for decades.</p>
<p>The study, published in the journal Ionics, comes from a group at Chongqing Jiaotong University led by Liyang Lin, together with colleagues at Chongqing University. Their target was poly(ethylene oxide), or PEO, the workhorse polymer of solid electrolyte research. PEO is flexible, easy to process and dissolves lithium salts well, but it carries an Achilles heel: at practical operating temperatures its polymer chains crystallize into ordered regions that act as barriers to ion movement. The result is sluggish lithium-ion transport, uneven metal deposition and, ultimately, the growth of lithium dendrites, needle-like structures that pierce the electrolyte and short-circuit the cell.</p>
<p>Researchers have tried to break PEO&#8217;s crystalline grip before, most commonly by sprinkling in ceramic nanoparticles. The problem is that nanoscale particles tend to clump together, a phenomenon known as agglomeration, which concentrates rather than distributes their benefits and can introduce defects. The Chinese team sidestepped this obstacle with what they call a dual-filler synergistic strategy, simultaneously adding graphene oxide nanosheets and polyvinylpyrrolidone, or PVP, a non-ionic polymer, into the PEO matrix along with the lithium salt LiTFSI. The pairing is deliberate: the hydrophobic groups of PVP anchor onto the surfaces of the graphene oxide, wrapping the nanosheets in a polymeric steric layer that keeps them dispersed.</p>
<p>That dispersion matters because each filler performs distinct chemical work. Graphene oxide&#8217;s oxygen-rich surface provides sites that interact with the lithium salt and with PEO chains, helping to loosen the salt&#8217;s ion pairs and free more lithium ions to migrate. PVP, meanwhile, contributes carbonyl groups that further coordinate lithium ions and disrupt the regular packing of PEO chains, suppressing crystallinity and enlarging the amorphous regions through which ions travel. Together, the additives act on the two fundamental levers of polymer electrolyte performance: how many charge carriers exist and how easily they move.</p>
<p>The measured results are striking. The modified electrolyte, which the researchers abbreviate GPP SPE, achieved an ionic conductivity of 4.1 times ten to the minus four siemens per centimetre at 60 degrees Celsius, a figure that places it among the better-performing PEO-based systems. Equally important is the lithium-ion transference number, which reached 0.57. Because PEO conducts both lithium cations and bulky TFSI anions, much of the current in unmodified systems is carried by anions that contribute nothing to charging the battery while creating damaging concentration gradients. A transference number above one half means lithium ions dominate the current, a key ingredient for uniform metal deposition.</p>
<p>The electrolyte also proved electrochemically robust, with a stability window extending to 4.75 volts, wide enough to accommodate high-voltage cathode materials beyond the iron-phosphate chemistry tested in the study. Mechanical and interfacial integrity are the silent prerequisites for dendrite suppression, and the graphene oxide network, braced by well-dispersed filler surfaces, helps the membrane resist the local stress concentrations that form when lithium begins to pile up unevenly on an electrode.</p>
<p>The cycling experiments translate those numbers into endurance. In symmetric lithium-lithium cells, the modified electrolyte sustained stable plating and stripping for more than 1000 hours at a current density of 0.1 milliamperes per square centimetre without short-circuiting, a benchmark of dendrite resistance that unmodified PEO systems rarely approach. The researchers attribute this to the combination of faster ion transport and a higher lithium-ion fraction, which keeps the supply of lithium ions at the electrode surface steady and prevents the deprivation-driven nucleation of dendrites.</p>
<p>Full cells told a similarly encouraging story. When paired with a lithium iron phosphate cathode and a lithium metal anode, the all-solid-state cells delivered an initial discharge capacity of 151.1 milliampere-hours per gram at a rate of 0.5C and retained 80.44 percent of that capacity after 200 cycles. Capacity fade in such cells is usually accelerated by growing interfacial resistance as the electrolyte and electrodes drift apart chemically and physically; the comparatively gentle decline here suggests that the GPP membrane maintains stable contact with both electrodes throughout repeated cycling.</p>
<p>What makes the advance appealing beyond the laboratory bench is its simplicity and scalability. Graphene oxide can be produced from graphite at scale, PVP is a commodity polymer used in pharmaceuticals and coatings, and the modification strategy requires no exotic precursors or elaborate synthesis. The authors describe their approach as a scalable and robust paradigm for designing high-safety, high-performance solid-state electrolytes, and the dual-filler concept could in principle be extended to other polymer hosts and filler chemistries. For a field where the gap between elegant laboratory demonstrations and manufacturable products has proven hard to close, a strategy built on cheap, processable ingredients is a meaningful signal.</p>
<p>Challenges remain before such membranes power vehicles or grid installations. The performance figures were obtained at elevated temperature, and further work will be needed to push conductivity into the room-temperature regime where most consumer applications operate. Thicker membranes, faster charge rates and larger-format cells will all test the strategy under harsher conditions than coin cells can impose. Still, the study offers a clear demonstration that the path to safer lithium metal batteries may not run through entirely new materials, but through smarter combinations of the ones we already have, coaxing a fifty-year-old polymer to behave like the electrolyte the industry has been waiting for.</p>
<p>The physics behind the transference number deserves closer attention, because it is often the quiet determinant of whether a solid electrolyte can actually suppress dendrites. In a conventional PEO-LiTFSI blend, both lithium cations and TFSI anions drift under the applied field, but they move at different speeds. As the anions migrate away from the anode during charging, a region depleted of mobile ions forms near the lithium metal surface, and the local current density becomes concentrated at protrusions where lithium ions arrive preferentially. This positive feedback loop is the classical mechanism by which a smooth lithium surface sprouts dendrites. An electrolyte in which lithium ions carry the majority of the current, as in the GPP membrane, weakens this feedback at its origin, because the ion supply at the electrode remains comparatively uniform across the interface.</p>
<p>The role of graphene oxide in this system also connects to a broader trend in electrolyte research: the use of two-dimensional materials whose surfaces are chemically active rather than merely inert reinforcements. Unlike ceramic particles such as alumina or silica, whose contribution to conductivity comes largely from Lewis-acid-base interactions at their surfaces, graphene oxide brings a dense population of epoxide, hydroxyl and carboxyl groups that can coordinate lithium ions directly. These oxygen-containing sites act as anchoring points that compete with the ether oxygens of PEO for lithium binding, effectively loosening the coordination environment of the cation and lowering the energy barrier for it to hop from one site to the next. The same functional groups also hydrogen-bond with the polymer backbone, which is one route by which the ordered folding of PEO chains into crystalline lamellae is disrupted.</p>
<p>PVP&#8217;s contribution illustrates a subtler point about composite design: fillers and polymer additives need not perform the same function to be compatible. Steric stabilization, the mechanism by which PVP keeps the nanosheets apart, is a well-established principle in colloid science. Polymer chains grafted or adsorbed onto a particle surface create an entropic repulsion when two particles approach, because the overlapping polymer layers would lose configurational freedom. Applying this to electrolyte membranes solves a problem that has limited ceramic-filler approaches for years, namely that the filler loading needed for meaningful conductivity gains often exceeds the threshold at which particles aggregate and the film becomes brittle.</p>
<p>The electrochemical stability window of 4.75 volts is also worth contextualizing. PEO itself is known to oxidize at relatively modest potentials, which has historically confined PEO-based electrolytes to lithium iron phosphate and other 4-volt-class cathodes. A widened window suggests that the fillers modify the oxidative decomposition pathways at the cathode interface, possibly by participating in the formation of a protective interphase that passivates the electrolyte surface. Whether such an interphase remains robust against cathodes like high-nickel layered oxides, which operate at higher potentials and impose greater chemical stress, would be a natural question for follow-up work.</p>
<p>It is also instructive to view the result against the wider landscape of solid electrolyte families. Inorganic conductors such as sulfides and garnets offer higher room-temperature conductivity, but they demand moisture-free processing, high sintering temperatures and careful interface engineering. Polymer membranes, by contrast, can be cast as flexible films, tolerate electrode volume changes during cycling, and are manufactured with equipment similar to that used for conventional separators. The trade-off has always been conductivity, and strategies like the one demonstrated here attack precisely that weakness while preserving the processing advantages that make polymers attractive for mass production.</p>
<p>Finally, the endurance of the symmetric cells over more than a thousand hours provides a statistical picture of reliability that single-cycle measurements cannot. Dendrite failure is often stochastic, appearing after hundreds of hours of apparently stable operation, so long-duration plating and stripping tests at fixed current density remain one of the most trusted indicators of genuine dendrite resistance. Combined with the capacity retention in full cells, the data suggest that the dual-filler concept addresses not just ion transport in the bulk but the coupled electrochemical-mechanical behavior of the interfaces, which is where most solid-state batteries ultimately fail.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Dual-filler modification of PEO-based solid polymer electrolytes with graphene oxide and polyvinylpyrrolidone to enable fast lithium-ion transport and dendrite-free lithium metal batteries</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> GO/PVP modified solid polymer electrolyte with fast lithium-ion transport for stable and dendrite-free lithium metal batteries</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Lin, L., Shi, B., Wang, T., Wang, Y., He, Y., &amp; Wei, Z. (2026). GO/PVP modified solid polymer electrolyte with fast lithium-ion transport for stable and dendrite-free lithium metal batteries. <em>Ionics</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-026-07518-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-026-07518-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-026-07518-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11581-026-07518-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> solid polymer electrolyte, lithium metal battery, graphene oxide, polyvinylpyrrolidone, PEO, lithium-ion transport, dendrite suppression, ionic conductivity, solid-state batteries, LiTFSI, transference number, energy storage</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">193274</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
