<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>patient and caregiver involvement in safety &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/patient-and-caregiver-involvement-in-safety/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 11:47:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Spanish faculty survey finds perceived gaps in patient safety curricula</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/spanish-faculty-survey-finds-perceived-gaps-in-patient-safety-curricula/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Courtney Benton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 11:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[barriers to patient safety curriculum implementation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curriculum integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curriculum time constraints in medical schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faculty perceptions of safety education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[faculty survey]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare-associated infection prevention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[healthcare-associated infections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical school curriculum analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical schools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient and caregiver involvement in safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient safety education gaps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality improvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality improvement in healthcare education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety culture in medical training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[system failure understanding in medical education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teamwork]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teamwork training in healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHO recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHO recommended patient safety topics]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=329000</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A survey of 29 Spanish medical faculty members found perceived gaps in WHO-recommended patient-safety topics, especially teamwork, learning from errors and patient and caregiver involvement.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A cross-sectional survey of professors and deans at Spanish medical schools identified perceived gaps in undergraduate patient safety education, with 46% of respondents saying fewer than 60% of the 11 patient-safety topics recommended by the World Health Organization were included in their curricula. The survey invited 80 faculty members from 49 medical schools, and 29 participated, producing a response rate of 36%. Only 21% of respondents said 81% to 100% of the recommended topics were integrated.</p>
<p>Quality improvement was the most frequently reported area of integration, included according to 85% of respondents, followed by minimizing healthcare-associated infections at 82%. Less widespread were patient and caregiver involvement, identified by 46%; understanding system failures and learning from errors, at 29%; and teamwork, at 26%. The findings represent the views of participating faculty rather than a direct analysis of curriculum documents, classroom delivery or student learning, so they do not establish how consistently the topics were taught or how well students mastered them.</p>
<p>Respondents identified a lack of curriculum time as the main barrier to broader integration, with 74% citing this constraint. Faculty resistance to change was the second most common reported obstacle, mentioned by 37%. The study’s conclusion also identified a weak safety culture as an institutional challenge. Because the research used a cross-sectional perception survey, it cannot determine the causes of the reported curricular gaps or whether changes to courses would affect clinical outcomes.</p>
<p>When asked about teaching methods, 41% of respondents preferred a mix of theoretical and practical classes delivered through both a dedicated patient safety course and other subjects, including clinical rotations. This expressed preference was not an evaluation of any teaching model. Respondents also perceived more patient-safety integration than had been documented in previous reviews of official syllabi. With a 36% response rate and a focus on perceptions among 29 participating academics, the results provide a limited snapshot rather than a representative assessment of all Spanish universities, and the survey did not measure whether any particular curriculum format was more effective than another.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Faculty perceptions of patient-safety integration in Spanish undergraduate medical curricula</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Integration of patient safety in Spanish Universities – Professors’ and Deans’ opinions</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Espinel Ruiz, M. A., Fernandez Chavez, A. C., McGee Laso, A., Álvarez León, E. E., Manzano Espinosa, L., &amp; Aranaz Andrés, J. M. (2026). Integration of patient safety in Spanish Universities – Professors’ and Deans’ opinions. <em>BMC Medical Education</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10499-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10499-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10499-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s12909-026-10499-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> patient safety, medical education, Spain, medical schools, curriculum integration, WHO recommendations, teamwork, quality improvement, healthcare-associated infections, faculty survey, Integration, patient</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">329000</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
