<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>parasites &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/parasites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:14:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Alligator Leeches Reveal a Hidden Core Microbiome Built for a Blood-Only Diet</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/alligator-leeches-reveal-a-hidden-core-microbiome-built-for-a-blood-only-diet/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Morrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 08:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[16S rRNA sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alligator leeches microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alligator-leech microbial relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American alligator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial nutrient synthesis in leeches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial symbionts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blood-feeding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blood-feeding organism microbiota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blood-only diet symbiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of environment on leech microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial diversity in blood feeders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial ecology of reptile parasites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Placobdella]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Placobdella microbiome study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reichenowia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reptile parasite bacterial partnerships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specialized bacterial organs in leeches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symbiont swapping in parasites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[symbiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wetlands]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=246810</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A sweeping survey of Placobdella leeches from American alligators across the southeastern United States reveals a conserved core microbiome, four previously unknown leech lineages, and evidence that blood-feeding symbionts persist even as environmental microbes are lost.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hidden on the armored hide of the American alligator, small flat leeches of the genus Placobdella are quietly running one of nature&#8217;s most intimate microbial partnerships. A new open-access study in the journal Microbial Ecology has taken the most detailed look yet at the bacteria living inside these reptile parasites, sequencing the whole-body microbiomes of leeches collected from alligators across the southeastern United States. The results reveal a surprisingly consistent set of microbial companions, hints of ongoing symbiont swapping between leech species, and a clear demonstration that when these animals are removed from their natural environment, their inner microbial world begins to collapse.</p>
<p>Blood is a deceptively poor meal. It is rich in protein and iron but notoriously deficient in B vitamins and other essential nutrients that animals cannot manufacture on their own. Blood-feeding organisms, from ticks to vampire bats to tsetse flies, have therefore repeatedly evolved relationships with bacteria that can synthesize the missing nutrients. In leeches, the best-known example is Reichenowia, a bacterial symbiont housed in specialized organs and thought to help offset the nutritional shortcomings of a blood-only diet. While Reichenowia has been documented in Placobdella before, the broader microbial community of these leeches, and the ecological forces that shape it, have remained largely unexplored.</p>
<p>To fill that gap, a team led by Logan M. Morris and Shana K. Goffredi of Occidental College, working with collaborators at Clemson University, the Tom Yawkey Wildlife Center, and the University of Georgia, sampled Placobdella leeches from American alligators (Alligator mississippiensis) in seven states, from North Carolina to Texas. The fieldwork depended on an unusually broad network of state wildlife agencies, refuges, and private landowners, reflecting the logistical challenge of collecting parasites from a large, powerful apex predator. The sampling effort captured seven distinct Placobdella clades, and, notably, four of those lineages had never before been reported from alligators, including several that appear to be undescribed species.</p>
<p>The researchers characterized the leech microbiomes using sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene, a standard molecular tool that identifies bacteria by reading a conserved region of their genetic code. Across the seven clades, the microbiomes were dominated by four major bacterial groups: Actinobacteriota, Alphaproteobacteria, Bacteroidota, and Pseudomonadota, the phylum that includes the former class Betaproteobacteria, to which Reichenowia belongs. That combination of dominant taxa, repeated across leeches from widely separated wetlands, suggests a candidate core microbiome, a stable set of microbes that persists regardless of where the host animal happens to live.</p>
<p>Yet the story is not one of rigid host control. When the team tested whether microbiome composition tracked leech clade, geographic location, or habitat type, none of these factors emerged as a strong organizing force. Instead, the communities were only loosely structured, with location-specific bacterial signatures appearing here and there rather than a clean pattern of separation. This mixture of a conserved core and a variable periphery points to a microbiome assembled through two simultaneous processes: long-term, persistent symbiotic interactions inherited or maintained through the leech life cycle, and ongoing acquisition of environmental microbes from the surrounding water and the alligator itself.</p>
<p>One of the most striking findings came from captivity. Leeches held under controlled conditions showed significant declines in microbial diversity, losing much of the richness seen in wild-caught animals. Only four bacterial taxa persisted through the captivity period. This natural experiment, unplanned but highly informative, suggests that the diverse wild microbiome depends on continuous input from the environment, while a small, resilient set of bacteria, likely including the most functionally important symbionts, clings on even when external sources are cut off. The four persistent taxa therefore represent strong candidates for the functional heart of the Placobdella microbiome.</p>
<p>The comparison with the host&#8217;s own surfaces added another layer. When the researchers compared leech microbiomes with microbial communities on alligator skin, they found limited overlap. In other words, the leeches are not simply picking up whatever bacteria happen to be sitting on the alligator&#8217;s hide. Their internal communities are distinct, consistent with the idea that a combination of host filtering and symbiont maintenance, rather than passive contamination, shapes what lives inside a feeding leech.</p>
<p>The Reichenowia results were particularly intriguing from an evolutionary standpoint. As expected, each Placobdella species generally carried its own distinct Reichenowia lineage, a pattern consistent with long-term coevolution between host and symbiont, in which bacterial lineages diverge alongside their host species. But the sequencing also revealed multiple low-abundance Reichenowia variants within individual leeches, and, remarkably, an identical Reichenowia variant was detected in two Placobdella species living in the same location. That shared variant hints that symbiont transmission between sympatric leech species may occur, whether through shared feeding sites, environmental reservoirs, or horizontal transfer events that standard models of strict vertical inheritance would not predict.</p>
<p>Together, these findings paint a picture of microbiome assembly in blood-feeding leeches as a dynamic balance. A conserved candidate core, presumably anchored by nutrient-providing symbionts like Reichenowia, is maintained across species and landscapes, while a shifting cast of environmental bacteria is acquired and lost depending on circumstances. The detection of previously unknown Placobdella lineages on alligators also expands the known diversity of these parasites and suggests that the microbiome stories of many leech species remain untold. Because leeches move between hosts and environments, they may serve as useful indicators of microbial exchange within wetland ecosystems.</p>
<p>The study also carries practical implications. Captivity-induced loss of microbial diversity is a cautionary signal for anyone maintaining parasitic or symbiont-bearing animals in the laboratory, since the loss of key microbes could alter host nutrition, immunity, or behavior in ways that confound experiments. For conservation biologists monitoring alligator populations in the southeastern United States, the leech microbiome offers a new lens on host health and environmental exposure. And for microbiologists, the work adds Placobdella to the growing list of blood-feeding animals whose dependence on bacterial partners illuminates how symbiosis makes extreme lifestyles possible. As sequencing surveys like this one accumulate across host species and habitats, the emerging theme is clear: even the simplest-looking parasite communities are built on layered, persistent, and still-evolving microbial foundations.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Microbiome diversity and symbiont dynamics in Placobdella leeches parasitizing American alligators</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Microbiome Diversity, Persistence, and Potential Symbiont Dynamics in Placobdella Leeches from American Alligators</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Morris, L. M., Boucher, M., Service, C., Anderson, J. T., Rainwater, T. R., Parrott, B. B., &amp; Goffredi, S. K. (2026). Microbiome Diversity, Persistence, and Potential Symbiont Dynamics in Placobdella Leeches from American Alligators. <em>Microbial Ecology</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-026-02897-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-026-02897-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-026-02897-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00248-026-02897-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Placobdella, American alligator, leech, microbiome, Reichenowia, symbiosis, blood-feeding, 16S rRNA sequencing, Microbial Ecology, parasites, wetlands, bacterial symbionts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">246810</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cats, Parasites and Happiness: New Global Study Links Felines to National Well-Being</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/cats-parasites-and-happiness-new-global-study-links-felines-to-national-well-being/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ophelia Keating]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 21:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological factors influencing happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-country analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cross-country analysis of happiness and pet ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domestic cats and national happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological and health effects of feline parasites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological impact of pets on societal happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feline parasites and well-being]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global study on cats and human life satisfaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative approaches to measuring national well-being]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasitic infections and mental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pet ownership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PLOS One]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[relationship between pet-related parasites and collective happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of animals and parasites in psychological well-being]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socioeconomic indicators versus biological variables in happiness studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subjective well-being]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxoplasma gondii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoonotic disease]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=219378</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new PLOS One study of 93 countries finds that higher cat density is associated with greater national happiness while higher Toxoplasma gondii prevalence is linked to lower well-being.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National happiness has long been measured against familiar yardsticks: gross domestic product, household income, health expenditure and life expectancy. A new study published on September 30, 2026 in the open-access journal PLOS One suggests that the picture of collective well-being may be incomplete without considering an unexpected variable: the domestic cat. Javier I. Borráz-León of the Secretariat of Science, Humanities, Technology, and Innovation in Mexico City and colleagues analyzed data from 93 countries and found that both cats and the parasites they carry are strongly correlated with national happiness scores, in ways that pull in opposite directions. The findings do not overturn the importance of wealth and health, but they add a biological and ecological dimension to a field that has traditionally been dominated by socioeconomic indicators.</p>
<p>The researchers set out to examine whether factors rarely explored in happiness research might underlie some of the variation in how countries score on subjective well-being measures. National happiness scores, which aggregate how satisfied people report being with their lives, are well documented to track economic conditions such as family income and the costs of health care. Yet these economic variables cannot fully explain why some nations consistently report higher well-being than others with comparable resources. To probe this gap, the team compiled country-level data on income, health costs, GDP, the density of domestic cats, and the prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii, a single-celled parasite that reproduces in cats and can be transmitted to humans.</p>
<p>The results were striking in their asymmetry. Countries with greater numbers of cats tended to report higher levels of national happiness, a pattern consistent with a substantial body of research on the emotional and psychological benefits of pet ownership. At the same time, countries with higher prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection tended to report lower levels of happiness, even though the parasite is spread by the very animals associated with the positive effect. This counterintuitive divergence, the authors argue, points to complex factors at work rather than any simple causal chain running from cats to contentment or from parasites to misery.</p>
<p>The dataset included China, which offers a concrete illustration of the patterns the researchers observed. In the data used by the team, China reported a happiness index just above the average for the countries included in the study, at 5.97 versus an average of 5.72. Its cat density was relatively low, with 376 cats per 10,000 people compared to an average of 989, while its IgM seroprevalence levels for T. gondii fell at the average, with both measures categorized as level 3 on a five-level scale. Such country-level snapshots underscore that the relationships among cats, parasites and happiness vary considerably across nations and cannot be reduced to a single global trend.</p>
<p>The authors are careful to emphasize what the study does and does not show. As an ecological correlational analysis, it compares aggregate figures across countries rather than tracking individuals, so it cannot establish that owning cats makes people happier or that Toxoplasma infection makes them less happy. In their own words: &#8220;What we found is that countries with more cats tended to report higher levels of happiness, while countries with higher exposure to Toxoplasma gondii tended to report lower levels of happiness. Of course, these are associations at the country level, so we cannot say that having more cats makes people happier or that Toxoplasma makes people less happy, but the patterns are interesting enough to deserve further investigation.&#8221;</p>
<p>One plausible mechanism, the authors suggest, runs through economic conditions. Higher national income and better public health infrastructure might simultaneously encourage pet ownership and reduce infection rates, since wealthier societies often have greater access to veterinary care, parasite control and sanitation. In this view, cats are not themselves the cause of happiness but a visible marker of the prosperity and health systems that foster both companion animals and lower parasite exposure. The negative association between Toxoplasma prevalence and happiness could then reflect the same underlying socioeconomic gradient rather than any direct effect of the parasite on mood at the population level.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most surprising result was the relationship between the two biological variables themselves. &#8220;One of the most surprising findings was that countries with more cats did not show greater exposure to Toxoplasma gondii; in fact, the association went in the opposite direction,&#8221; the authors note. &#8220;This highlights an important point: the relationship between humans, animals, and infectious diseases depends not simply on the presence of animals, but also on the social, economic, and environmental conditions in which those interactions occur.&#8221; In other words, cat density alone does not determine how much parasite exposure a population experiences; hygiene, food safety, climate and public health practices all shape transmission pathways independently of how many cats live in a country.</p>
<p>For the researchers, the broader significance of the work lies in its integration of research traditions that rarely intersect. &#8220;What we find most interesting is that these results bring together factors that are usually studied separately: wealth, health, human–animal relationships, and infectious disease,&#8221; the authors explain. &#8220;Our study suggests that understanding why some populations report greater well-being may require us to consider biological and ecological factors alongside the socioeconomic conditions that have traditionally received most attention.&#8221; This framing positions the study as an invitation to widen the analytical lens of happiness research, which has historically centered on economics and public health statistics while leaving ecology and zoonotic disease largely unexamined.</p>
<p>The study, titled &#8220;Wealth, health, cats and Toxoplasma gondii: An ecological correlational study of subjective well-being across 93 countries,&#8221; was conducted by an international team spanning Mexico, Finland, Latvia and the United States, and received no specific external funding. The authors declare no competing interests. As an observational study, it demonstrates that biological factors, and not only economic ones, can correlate with happiness, revealing new avenues for investigating national well-being. The authors caution that while the analysis unveils previously unrecognized relationships, future studies will be needed to determine the underlying mechanisms, ideally through designs that can test individual-level effects rather than country-level associations.</p>
<p>For now, the message for the public is one of measured curiosity rather than practical prescription. Nothing in the data suggests that adopting a cat will raise a nation&#8217;s happiness score, nor that cat populations should be managed to control Toxoplasma exposure as a well-being policy. What the study does offer is a reminder that the determinants of how societies feel may be stranger and more interconnected than the standard dashboards of GDP and health spending imply. The companionship of animals, the ecology of parasites and the prosperity of nations appear to be woven together in patterns that scientists are only beginning to untangle, and the humble house cat has turned out to be an unexpected thread in that fabric.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Ecological correlational study of cats, Toxoplasma gondii prevalence and national happiness across 93 countries</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Wealth and health aren’t the only indicators of national happiness – there’s also cats!</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Wealth and health aren’t the only indicators of national happiness – there’s also cats!. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1146153" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> national happiness, cats, Toxoplasma gondii, subjective well-being, parasites, PLOS One, pet ownership, GDP, public health, ecological study, cross-country analysis, zoonotic disease</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">219378</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>DNA in Parrot Droppings Reveals a Startling Shift in Patagonia&#8217;s Largest Bird Colony</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/dna-in-parrot-droppings-reveals-a-startling-shift-in-patagonias-largest-bird-colony/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Margaret Porter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 21:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bird foraging behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burrowing Parrot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Burrowing Parrots conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diet composition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA in bird droppings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA metabarcoding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[El Cóndor colony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental changes affecting parrot feeding habits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of diet shift on parrot populations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[introduced plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[La Niña]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large-scale bird colony monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular scatology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next-generation DNA sequencing in wildlife research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next-generation sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parrot diet analysis using DNA sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patagonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patagonia avian biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patagonia bird colony ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Patagonia ecosystem and species diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psittaciformes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[significance of diet in bird conservation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=212555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[DNA metabarcoding of a full year of fecal samples from the world's largest parrot colony reveals that Burrowing Parrots now eat mostly introduced plants, a surprising shift that may reflect either remarkable adaptability or a hidden threat to their survival.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every evening in the village of El Cóndor, in north-eastern Patagonia, Argentina, thousands of Burrowing Parrots descend on the power lines to roost for the night. Beneath those wires, a team of researchers laid out sheets of clean metal foil and waited. What they collected was not glamorous: fresh droppings, gathered month after month across an entire year. But those samples, analyzed with next-generation DNA sequencing, have now produced one of the most detailed portraits ever assembled of what a wild parrot eats — and the results are turning expectations upside down.</p>
<p>The Burrowing Parrot, Cyanoliseus patagonus, is no ordinary bird. It breeds in colonies dug into soft sandstone and limestone cliffs known as barrancas, and the colony near El Cóndor, beside the Río Negro estuary, is the largest known colony of any parrot species on Earth. Stretching 18.1 kilometers along the coast, it holds roughly 71 percent of the global breeding population, with long-term monitoring between 1998 and 2019 recording between 22,000 and 41,000 active nests. Understanding what these birds eat is therefore not a niche question of natural history; it is central to the survival of the majority of the species.</p>
<p>Historically, Burrowing Parrots were thought to feed mainly on the native vegetation of the Monte and Espinal ecoregions: seeds and fruits of chañar, caldén, algarrobo trees, berries of native shrubs such as Lycium, Discaria and Schinus, and grasses of the arid scrubland. Early naturalists, including W. H. Hudson in 1923 and Alexander Wetmore in 1926, described a diet rooted firmly in Patagonia&#8217;s native flora. The new study, published in The Science of Nature, tells a very different story. Of 202 valid plant molecular operational taxonomic units, or MOTUs, identified in the parrots&#8217; droppings over the annual cycle, only 13 percent corresponded to native plants. Fully 40 percent were introduced species, with a further 4.5 percent presumed introduced, 12 percent ornamental garden plants, and 6.9 percent cultivated crops and pastures.</p>
<p>The methodology behind these numbers is a textbook example of modern molecular scatology. Between January and December 2021, the researchers collected 220 fresh fecal samples from the roosting flocks — 20 per month, except February, when the parrots mysteriously abandon the village roost. DNA was extracted from 178 samples using a stool kit optimized with bead-beating homogenization and extended incubation. Two primer sets were then amplified: one targeting the second internal transcribed spacer (ITS2) of plant nuclear ribosomal DNA, and a second targeting Bilateralia, the group that includes all animals with bilateral symmetry, to detect parasites and other animal DNA. The libraries were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq with 250-base-pair paired-end reads.</p>
<p>The bioinformatic pipeline was equally rigorous. Reads were quality-trimmed with TRIMMOMATIC, merged with FLASH, de-replicated and screened for chimeras with USEARCH, and clustered into MOTUs. Each MOTU was then matched against the NCBI GenBank nucleotide database using BLASTn, with stringent thresholds: sequences had to be at least 190 base pairs long, with matches above 98 percent identity and an e-value below 0.00001. Species-level assignments required matches above 99.5 percent with consistent quality metrics across all retained hits. Negative extraction controls and PCR-grade water controls showed no contamination, and a dedicated gap analysis confirmed that the reference libraries were adequate: 69 percent of native plant species in the region have reference sequences in GenBank, rising to 97 percent at the genus level — sufficient given that 85 percent of the recovered MOTUs could be assigned to genus or better.</p>
<p>The seasonal patterns that emerged were striking. The parrots consumed 77 plant taxa during the breeding season, 172 during the post-breeding period, 72 in winter and 70 during pre-breeding — a statistically significant difference, with dietary diversity peaking just after the chicks fledge. This post-breeding explosion in dietary breadth coincides with the period when most plants in the region produce fruits and release seeds, and it is a critical window for juvenile survival, as young parrots must build up reserves before the harsh Patagonian winter. Non-metric multidimensional scaling and permutational multivariate analysis of variance revealed considerable overlap in diet across breeding, post-breeding and pre-breeding stages, but far less overlap with winter, when the birds turn to plants such as white spruce, velvet grass, perennial ryegrass and other introduced and ornamental species that are absent from the diet at other times of year.</p>
<p>Could the dominance of introduced plants be an artifact of sampling location? The researchers considered this carefully. Because samples were collected in the evening at the village roost, the diet might theoretically be biased toward items eaten near El Cóndor, where the landscape is most heavily modified. But several lines of evidence argue against it. Observations over five breeding seasons show the parrots flying over fields near the village without stopping to feed, and previous tracking studies show they forage between 58 kilometers northwest and 66 kilometers northeast of the colony. Moreover, digestive transit studies in parrots — corn-fed budgerigars empty their entire digestive tract within 26 hours — indicate that the DNA detected in evening droppings most likely reflects a full day of foraging, not just the last hours.</p>
<p>The most plausible explanation, the authors argue, is environmental degradation. Since the 1970s, a combination of increased rainfall and aggressive land clearing has transformed the region. In the Patagones department, natural vegetation that covered 65 percent of the land in 1975 has been reduced to an estimated 20 to 29 percent; in just three years, from 2015 to 2018, more than 216,000 hectares were cleared. In Adolfo Alsina department, home to El Cóndor, nearly 49,000 hectares were cleared between 1986 and 2006. Such landscape-scale disturbance disrupts native plant communities and opens the door to alien species. The parrots, it appears, are switching from a diet historically based on Monte and Espinal plants to one now dominated by introduced species — either a remarkable display of behavioral flexibility, or a warning sign of a suboptimal strategy that could undermine the persistence of the world&#8217;s largest parrot colony. A persistent La Niña event before and during the study may also have reduced the availability of native plants, though the authors caution that a single year of sampling cannot establish causation, and multi-year research is essential, especially as La Niña events are expected to become more frequent under climate change.</p>
<p>The study also delivered an unexpected bonus: a parasitological survey conducted entirely from droppings. Using the Bilateralia primer, the team identified 31 animal MOTUs, including four parasite families never before recorded in the digestive tracts of Burrowing Parrots: Gongylonematidae, which infects the oral cavity of birds and can cause starvation and death; Hymenolepididae and Onchobothriidae, both tapeworm groups previously unknown in parrots — Onchobothriidae had never been reported in any bird; and Capillariidae, thin nematodes known from captive parrots. The Gongylonematidae finding is particularly intriguing. During the 2020–2021 breeding season, at least 1,050 adult parrots died at El Cóndor — compared with the 20 to 30 typically found dead each year — and veterinary experts suspected infection rather than starvation as the primary cause. The authors stress that they can only speculate about a connection, but the possibility of a widespread Gongylonematidae infection driving that mortality event now demands investigation.</p>
<p>For decades, Burrowing Parrots were persecuted as agricultural pests, blamed for damage to maize, sunflowers, wheat and fruit orchards. The evidence tells a more nuanced story: systematic evaluations found that the birds affected only 0.1 to 0.4 percent of the sunflower harvest, leaving wheat and maize undamaged, and the species has been removed from Argentina&#8217;s pest-control lists. The new data reinforce this picture — cultivated plants made up just 6.9 percent of the diet, and official agricultural statistics suggest these mostly correspond to forage pastures of oats and barley rather than standing crops. As the clearance of the Monte continues and the El Cóndor colony concentrates the vast majority of the world&#8217;s Burrowing Parrots, the authors call for close monitoring of both population size and diet. The droppings collected under those Patagonian power lines have done more than reveal a menu; they have documented a dietary revolution in real time, flagged nine plant species newly introduced to the region, and possibly left a molecular clue to a mass mortality that still awaits explanation.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Seasonal diet composition of Burrowing Parrots revealed by DNA metabarcoding of fecal samples</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Using next-generation sequencing to unravel the diet composition of Burrowing Parrots over the annual cycle</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Masello, J. F., Failla, M., Leder, C. V., &amp; Quillfeldt, P. (2026). Using next-generation sequencing to unravel the diet composition of Burrowing Parrots over the annual cycle. <em>The Science of Nature, 113</em>(5), Article 119. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-026-02159-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-026-02159-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-026-02159-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00114-026-02159-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Burrowing Parrot, DNA metabarcoding, next-generation sequencing, diet composition, Patagonia, El Cóndor colony, molecular scatology, introduced plants, environmental degradation, parasites, Psittaciformes, La Niña</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">212555</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Norwegian Fish Farms Harbor Parasites That Reveal Coastal Ecosystem Stress</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/norwegian-fish-farms-harbor-parasites-that-reveal-coastal-ecosystem-stress/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Prescott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2026 02:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amoebic gill disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquaculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[around]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biodiversity and host specificity of marine parasites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chronic environmental pressure indicators in Norwegian coasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coastal ecosystem health indicators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystem stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental stress assessment through parasite analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish farm ecosystem degradation markers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fish health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of parasites on marine food webs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications of parasite presence for sustainable fisheries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limitations of parasite identification methods in aquaculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsporidia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norwegian fish farm parasite communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norwegian fjords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parasites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protist parasites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protistan parasite diversity in aquaculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of parasites in ecosystem resilience and stress response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single-celled eukaryote parasites in marine environments]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=184344</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A review finds that protist parasites around Norwegian fish farms may both threaten fish health and reveal persistent coastal ecosystem stress.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Norway’s marine fish farms are surrounded by a microscopic world that may offer an overlooked measure of coastal environmental health. A review by Isabelle Ewers and Micah Dunthorn identifies at least 24 protistan parasite taxa reported in and around Norwegian aquaculture sites, spanning amoebae, ciliates, diplomonads, ichthyosporeans, kinetoplastids, microsporidians, oomycetes and perkinsids. These organisms are single-celled or fungus-like eukaryotes, but their effects can extend from subtle changes in host condition to severe disease and mortality. The review’s central finding is not that every parasite signals an outbreak, but that the overall composition of parasite communities can reveal how ecosystems are responding to chronic pressure. The authors classify parasites according to where they live, how many hosts they require and how narrowly they select those hosts. Their analysis suggests that Norwegian coastal environments near farms are experiencing continuous moderate to high stress or some degree of degradation. The conclusion is provisional, because many taxa remain poorly studied and some identifications rely on methods that cannot distinguish closely related species.</p>
<p>Parasites are often treated solely as threats to farmed fish, yet they are also components of healthy food webs. They influence host populations, energy transfer, species interactions and biodiversity, making their disappearance as informative as their presence. The review applies an environmental-parasitology framework based on three traits: location on or inside the host, life-cycle complexity and host specificity. External parasites and free-living stages are directly exposed to changes in water quality, temperature, oxygen and other stressors. Internal parasites are buffered by the host and may persist longer as conditions deteriorate. Monoxenous parasites complete development in a single host, whereas heteroxenous parasites depend on two or more hosts, often including an invertebrate vector. Generalists can use multiple host species; specialists depend on a narrower set. Under environmental decline, external heteroxenous specialists are expected to disappear first, while internal monoxenous generalists may remain. That pattern dominated the Norwegian records, whereas parasites typically associated with less disturbed environments were largely absent.</p>
<p>The most prominent example is <i>Paramoeba perurans</i>, the amoeba responsible for amoebic gill disease in Atlantic salmon. The parasite attaches to the gills and contributes to excess mucus, pale patches, fused lamellae and abnormal thickening of the gill epithelium. Damage to the respiratory surface can cause circulatory problems, tissue death and respiratory distress. The amoeba has been detected in numerous fish species worldwide, and salmon, turbot and lumpfish can develop disease, although susceptibility differs among hosts. In Norway, recurrent outbreaks have been documented since 2013 after the first reported cases on the western coast in 2006. Higher salinity and temperatures above about 12 °C increase the likelihood of an outbreak, while optimal laboratory growth conditions are reported near salinity 35 and 15 °C. Mortality can vary widely, reaching as high as 90 percent in some western Norwegian farms. The review classifies <i>P. perurans</i> as an external, monoxenous generalist, a combination that could allow it to persist in moderately stressed waters. Its cells may also carry the bacterium <i>Candidatus Syngnamydia salmonis</i>, illustrating how interactions within a fish’s wider pathobiome can complicate disease.</p>
<p>Other parasites show why detection alone cannot be equated with disease. The kinetoplastid flagellates of the <i>Ichthyobodo</i> complex attach to fish skin and gills, where they can cause grey patches, lesions, mucus production and scale loss. Three described members—<i>Ichthyobodo hippoglossi</i>, <i>I. necator</i> and <i>I. salmonis</i>—have been identified in Norway, alongside incompletely identified forms. Molecular work has revealed that what was once treated as <i>I. necator</i> is a complex of sibling species, making historical records difficult to interpret. These parasites are widespread in farmed and wild salmonids and can act as opportunists when fish are weakened by environmental stress or another pathogen. The review notes their association with gill disorders and pancreas disease, a viral infection caused by salmonid alphavirus. By contrast, the ciliate <i>Trichodina cooperi</i> generally lives as a commensal on Atlantic cod and has not been linked to serious disease in Norway. It is an external, monoxenous specialist, a functional profile more consistent with slightly stressed or relatively healthy conditions. Its presence therefore provides a different ecological signal from the abundance of generalist opportunists.</p>
<p>The review also highlights parasites whose life cycles connect farmed fish with wild hosts or other animals. <i>Paranucleospora theridion</i>, a microsporidian also known by its former name <i>Desmozoon lepeophtherii</i>, develops through cycles in Atlantic salmon and the salmon louse, <i>Lepeophtheirus salmonis</i>. In salmon, it can produce systemic infection, cell damage, gill abnormalities, abdominal lesions, stunted growth and increased mortality. The parasite generates one type of spore that spreads within the fish and another robust form that can enter the environment. When salmon lice feed on infected salmon, they can acquire the microsporidian, which then undergoes a further developmental cycle inside the copepod. The exact route by which infection returns to salmon is not fully resolved, but spores released after infected lice die may form an environmental reservoir. Infection levels are higher in southern Norway but occur in northern farming regions as well. Because warming could increase transmission farther north, the species illustrates how climate change may reshape parasite distributions and intensify complex disease interactions. The authors classify it as an internal, heteroxenous generalist that can persist under moderate environmental stress.</p>
<p>Several microsporidians and related protists have substantial pathogenic potential even where Norwegian outbreaks have not been recorded. <i>Loma morhua</i> infects the gills and organs of Atlantic cod and has been associated elsewhere with impaired growth and mortality, but no disease outbreak caused by it has been reported in Norwegian farmed or wild cod. <i>Loma salmonae</i> forms enlarged cellular structures called xenomas and can cause microsporidial gill disease in salmonids; it was recently detected in sea-run brown trout in Norway, more often in warmer southern fjords. <i>Nucleospora salmonis</i> invades the nuclei of blood-forming cells and can cause severe anemia, immune suppression and a leukemia-like condition. It has been detected in Norwegian sea-run brown trout but has not yet been studied as a cause of Norwegian farm disease. A different threat is <i>Salmoxcellia vastator</i>, a perkinsid described from Norwegian salmonid aquaculture in 2021. It spreads through blood-rich tissues and produces white-yellow lesions in organs including the heart, liver, kidney and muscle. Advanced salmoxcellosis can reduce feeding, damage fillet quality and increase mortality. Reports increased in rainbow-trout farms from 2017, and the condition was observed in farmed Atlantic salmon in 2020. Its life cycle and host range remain uncertain, limiting the confidence of environmental predictions based on its detection.</p>
<p>Temperature-sensitive and vector-borne parasites add another layer of uncertainty. The marine ciliate <i>Cryptocaryon irritans</i>, which causes white-spot disease, has been detected through environmental DNA sequencing in salmon farms on Norway’s western coast, although no outbreak has been reported there. It normally reproduces near 19 °C, but some strains can reproduce in colder water, raising the possibility of future establishment as temperatures rise or adaptation occurs. The freshwater ciliate <i>Ichthyophthirius multifiliis</i> has been detected in a Norwegian salmon hatchery and in wild brown trout from fjords, particularly in lower-latitude areas and farming hotspots, but marine outbreaks have not been reported. Blood parasites such as <i>Trypanosoma murmanense</i> and <i>T. pleuronectidium</i> depend on marine leeches for transmission. The first is associated with the Arctic fish leech <i>Johanssonia arctica</i>, whose distribution restricts the parasite mainly to northern Atlantic regions; the second is transmitted by <i>Calliobdella nodulifera</i>. These heteroxenous specialist parasites were interpreted as indicators of relatively mild stress. Their presence demonstrates that a parasite community reflects not simply pollution or farm intensity, but also temperature, host diversity, vector distributions and food-web structure.</p>
<p>The researchers argue that better surveillance will require more than traditional microscopy and disease reporting. Many protists change shape during their life cycles, resemble close relatives or have unresolved species boundaries, so morphology alone can produce mistaken identifications. Genetic sequencing, environmental DNA and RNA, histopathology and experimental infection studies can help determine which taxa are present, whether they are viable, how they move between hosts and whether they are primary causes of disease or secondary colonizers of already weakened fish. This distinction matters for treatment, because control measures directed at a presumed pathogen may fail when disease results from several interacting organisms. It also matters for environmental assessment: the absence of a parasite may indicate severe degradation, but it may also reflect inadequate sampling. The review is therefore a starting point rather than a definitive ranking of Norwegian farm sites. The authors call for broader taxonomic coverage, clearer life-cycle studies and consistent molecular standards. As farming practices evolve and coastal waters warm, tracking the full protist community could help distinguish emerging threats from harmless residents—and turn some of the smallest organisms in the fjords into early-warning signals for the health of the wider ecosystem.</p>
<p>The ecological signal must be interpreted alongside the physical setting of a farm. Excess feed and faeces release organic matter, nitrogen and phosphorus, which can drive eutrophication in the water column and organic enrichment beneath cages. Altered sediment communities and geochemistry may promote acidic or oxygen-poor conditions, potentially changing both host susceptibility and the survival or transmission of parasite stages. Consequently, parasite records are most informative when paired with measurements of water quality, sediment condition, host health and wild-fish abundance rather than treated as a standalone score.</p>
<p>The review also places protists within a broader management problem. Treatments aimed at parasites can carry environmental costs, while repeated use may reduce sensitivity or select for resistance. Cleaner fish may lower salmon-lice burdens but can also introduce or transmit protists, including organisms not previously established at a site. Surveillance should therefore include farmed fish, cleaner fish, nearby wild hosts and environmental samples. A combined approach could reveal whether a detected organism is actively cycling, merely present as genetic material, or participating in a multi-organism pathobiome. Such evidence would help separate emerging disease risks from ecological indicators and support interventions that protect both production and coastal ecosystem function.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Protistan parasites as indicators of environmental stress around Norwegian marine fish farms</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> A review of protistan parasites in and around Norwegian marine fish farms</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ewers, I., &amp; Dunthorn, M. (2026). A review of protistan parasites in and around Norwegian marine fish farms. <em>Ocean Microbiology, 2</em>(1), Article 3. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s44375-026-00008-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s44375-026-00008-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s44375-026-00008-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s44375-026-00008-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> aquaculture, protist parasites, Norwegian fjords, fish health, ecosystem stress, amoebic gill disease, microsporidia, climate change, review, protistan, parasites, around</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">184344</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
