<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>optofluidics &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/optofluidics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 17:16:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Shape and Spin: How Particle Geometry Rewrites the Rules of Optical Tweezers</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/shape-and-spin-how-particle-geometry-rewrites-the-rules-of-optical-tweezers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 17:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advances in optical tweezers technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of particle spin and shape in optical manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geometric asymmetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of particle shape on optical forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interdisciplinary applications of optical tweezers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lab-on-a-chip optical techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laser-based micro-manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lateral drift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light science applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microscopic particle manipulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical sorting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical torque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical torque on asymmetric particles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical tweezers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optofluidics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paraxial trapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle geometry in optical trapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle morphology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[particle rotation and angular momentum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polarisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of particle morphology in optical trapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rotational freezing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spin angular momentum]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=262706</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers in China and Singapore show that particle shape and rotation angle can reverse optical torques and freeze rotation in optical tweezers, enabling shape-based optical sorting.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Optical tweezers have transformed the way scientists handle the microscopic world. By tightening a beam of laser light down to a diffraction-limited focus, researchers can trap, steer, and rotate objects that are far too small for any mechanical gripper to touch. The technique, honoured with the 2018 Nobel Prize in Physics, has become a workhorse across the physical and life sciences, from stretching single biological molecules to stirring flows inside lab-on-a-chip devices. For decades, the guiding intuition has been straightforward: when the trapping light carries spin angular momentum, a non-spherical particle caught in the beam will rotate continuously, spinning in the direction dictated by the polarisation of the light. A new study published in Light: Science &amp; Applications now shows that this intuition is incomplete, and that the missing piece has been hiding in plain sight within the geometry of the trapped particle itself.</p>
<p>A research team led by Professor Xinbin Cheng, Professor Yuzhi Shi, and Professor Hongfei Jiao from Tongji University in China, working together with Professor Cheng-Wei Qiu of the National University of Singapore and their co-workers, has established that particle morphology and rotation angle are decisive determinants of the optical torques and forces acting on shaped microparticles. Their findings apply with particular force to paraxial or slightly defocused optical systems, configurations that are ubiquitous in practical trapping experiments yet have frequently been overlooked in theoretical treatments. In such systems, the team demonstrates, a shaped particle displaced slightly from the beam axis experiences both positive and negative optical torques simultaneously, and the magnitude and sign of the net torque depend sensitively on the particle&#8217;s rotation angle and its dimensions.</p>
<p>The consequences of this torque balance are striking. When the opposing positive and negative torques reach equilibrium, the particle&#8217;s rotation ceases entirely. Rather than spinning endlessly in the sense dictated by the light&#8217;s spin angular momentum, the particle freezes at a specific orientation and then begins to drift steadily in the lateral direction, perpendicular to the beam axis. The authors designate this combined behaviour rotational freezing accompanied by stable lateral drift. What makes the discovery conceptually important is its origin: the effect arises exclusively from the geometric asymmetry of a single particle under paraxial trapping. It is fundamentally distinct from the mechanisms previously reported for negative optical torque, which required more elaborate ingredients such as particle clusters, chiral objects, vortex beams, or phase-gradient fields.</p>
<p>To isolate these effects with experimental clarity, the team devised an elegant simplification. They created a line-shaped spin light beam, a focused beam whose intensity distribution is elongated into a line rather than a symmetric spot. This geometry reduces the three-dimensional trapping problem to an effectively two-dimensional configuration, and it converts what would otherwise be orbital rotation of the particle into readily observable lateral motion. The reduction is more than a convenience; it turns a subtle torque balance into a direct, visible translation that can be tracked particle by particle, making the underlying physics accessible to measurement rather than remaining buried in the mathematics of the trapping field.</p>
<p>Using this platform, the researchers exposed particles of diverse geometries to the focused line-shaped beam. Their test library included long and short cylinders, triangles, trapezoids, and irregular morphologies, spanning the range of shapes from nearly spherical to strongly asymmetric. The observed behaviour departed sharply from conventional expectations. Instead of rotating continuously as standard theory predicts, each particle rotated toward a specific stable angle, became rotationally frozen at that orientation, and subsequently underwent lateral translation across the field of view. The direction of this drift was not fixed by the apparatus: it reversed when the light polarisation was inverted, and it also reversed when the particle&#8217;s length-to-diameter ratio was modified. Shape and spin, in other words, jointly command the motion.</p>
<p>The team substantiated these observations with comprehensive numerical simulations that reproduced the experimental trends and clarified the torque landscape responsible for them. In cylinder-shaped particles, stable freezing angles below ninety degrees were obtained under right-handed circular polarisation, whereas stable angles above ninety degrees emerged under left-handed polarisation. Crucially, this trend remained robust across variations in particle size, geometry, position within the beam, and refractive index. The consistency of the effect across such a broad parameter space is what elevates the finding from a curiosity of one particular setup to a general property of paraxial optical trapping of asymmetric particles.</p>
<p>The researchers emphasise the generality of what they observed. Irrespective of variations in particle size, rotation angle, position, refractive index, or the polarisation state of the light, rotational freezing and the subsequent lateral motion were consistently observed in their experiments and simulations. This, they argue, means the phenomenon constitutes a generic behaviour of shaped particles in paraxial traps rather than a coincidental occurrence tied to one special configuration. For anyone operating optical tweezers with non-spherical samples, the message is that the intrinsic morphology and instantaneous orientation of the particle can no longer be treated as secondary details; they actively govern the forces and torques delivered by the light.</p>
<p>The practical implications reach well beyond a correction to textbook theory. Because the sign and magnitude of the optical torque can be tuned by adjusting the particle&#8217;s shape, its orientation, and the polarisation of the beam, the effect opens a route to shape-based optical sorting, in which particles of different morphology respond differently to the same trapping field and can therefore be separated or bound selectively. The reversibility of the forces and torques, switchable through polarisation, adds an active control knob that passive sorting methods lack. The authors point to substantial implications for biophysics, where biological objects are rarely perfect spheres, for optofluidics, where controlled lateral drift could pump or route flows, and for quantum sciences and metaoptics, where precise optical control of asymmetric microscopic objects is increasingly essential.</p>
<p>By identifying geometric asymmetry as a standalone source of negative optical torque and rotational freezing, the study completes what the researchers describe as a hitherto missing building block in optical manipulation. The work reframes the interaction between light and shaped matter: the particle is not a passive passenger carried by the spin of the beam, but an active participant whose own form and orientation feed back into the forces it experiences. As optical tweezers continue to spread through microfluidics, biology, and quantum technology, the lesson of this study is that to fully command the microscopic world, scientists must account not only for the light they shine but for the shape of the objects they wish to move.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Morphology- and rotation-dependent optical forces and torques on non-spherical particles in paraxial optical tweezers</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Impacts of particle morphology and rotation on optical manipulation</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Impacts of particle morphology and rotation on optical manipulation. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1145812" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> optical tweezers, optical torque, particle morphology, rotational freezing, lateral drift, spin angular momentum, paraxial trapping, optical sorting, polarisation, geometric asymmetry, optofluidics, Light Science &amp; Applications</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">262706</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
