<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>optical vortices &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/optical-vortices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 09:40:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Topology Imprinting in Nonlinear Metasurfaces Could Reshape How Structured Light Is Made</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/topology-imprinting-in-nonlinear-metasurfaces-could-reshape-how-structured-light-is-made/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reid Dalton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 09:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Mathematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced photonic platforms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compact optical device design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harmonic generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[holography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEE Photonics Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[knotted optical fields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metasurfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nanophotonics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next-generation imaging systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonlinear metasurface engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonlinear optics.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical information encoding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical vortices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orbital angular momentum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orbital angular momentum beams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photonics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quantum photonics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structured light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structured light applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structured light generation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topological photonics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topology imprinting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topology imprinting in nonlinear metasurfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wavelength-independent structured light]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=234530</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new IEEE Photonics Journal review examines topology imprinting in nonlinear metasurfaces, a technique that transfers the spatial topology of structured light to newly generated frequencies and could enable compact next-generation photonic platforms.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Light has long been characterized by a familiar set of attributes: wavelength, amplitude, phase, and polarization. Yet over the past two decades, optical scientists have learned to sculpt light into intricate spatial patterns, a field now known as structured light. Beams carrying orbital angular momentum, knotted optical fields, and other exotic configurations have opened entirely new channels for encoding information, probing matter, and building next-generation imaging and communication systems. The trouble has always been practicality: generating these complex fields at arbitrary wavelengths with conventional optics is cumbersome, often requiring bulky assemblies of spatial light modulators, phase plates, and carefully aligned free-space components. A newly published review in the IEEE Photonics Journal argues that a concept called topology imprinting in nonlinear metasurfaces may finally dissolve that bottleneck, and in doing so chart a route toward compact photonic platforms capable of producing structured light on demand.</p>
<p>The review, authored by Hooman Barati Sedeh and Natalia M. Litchinitser of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Duke University, was made available online on May 18, 2026 and appears in Volume 18, Issue 04 of the IEEE Photonics Journal on August 1, 2026. Its central subject is a paradigm the authors describe as nonlinear topology imprinting, in which the spatial topology of an optical field at its fundamental frequency is directly transferred to the harmonic radiation generated within a metasurface. In other words, rather than fabricating a new optical element for every desired wavelength and pattern, the structure of the input beam is faithfully copied onto newly generated frequencies by the nonlinear response of the material itself. The work was also featured in the journal&#8217;s Special Issue on Photonics for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation, a nod to the growing relevance of energy-efficient photonic technologies in addressing global environmental challenges.</p>
<p>To appreciate why this matters, it helps to consider the physics of nonlinear frequency conversion. When intense light propagates through a medium with a nonlinear polarization response, new frequencies are born: second-harmonic, third-harmonic, and sum- or difference-frequency radiation, among others. In bulk nonlinear crystals, this process has been exploited for decades, but the wavefront of the generated light is typically dictated by phase-matching conditions and the geometry of the crystal, leaving limited freedom to impose arbitrary spatial structure. Metasurfaces change the calculus entirely. These are planar arrays of subwavelength resonators, often made of dielectric materials, each engineered to impart a precise amplitude, phase, and polarization response to incident light. By patterning the resonators across the surface, researchers can effectively program the wavefront of light at the nanoscale, compressing what once required a tabletop of optics into a film thinner than a wavelength.</p>
<p>The difficulty, as the review makes clear, has been combining two jobs at once. A metasurface designed to generate structured light at a harmonic frequency must simultaneously support efficient nonlinear conversion and impose the desired spatial pattern on the output. Designing resonators that operate efficiently at both the fundamental and harmonic frequencies is a formidable constraint, and material absorption at the generated wavelengths can bleed away precious conversion efficiency before the light ever exits the device. Nanofabrication tolerances add further limits, since the smallest features of the resonators must be rendered with high fidelity to preserve the delicate phase profiles that define structured beams. Topology imprinting offers an elegant way around these constraints: instead of encoding the full wavefront into the metasurface geometry, the approach lets the topology of the input field do the work, with the nonlinear process naturally carrying that topology across to the new frequency.</p>
<p>The experimental record reviewed by the authors demonstrates that this is more than theory. All-dielectric metasurfaces composed of subwavelength resonators have been used to realize topology imprinting in the laboratory, generating and preserving a variety of structured optical fields. Among the most striking demonstrations is the third-harmonic generation of optical vortex beams that retain the spatial topology of the fundamental beam. Vortex beams possess a phase singularity at their core, a point of darkness around which the phase winds, and they carry orbital angular momentum that can be used to encode information or exert torques on microscopic particles. Preserving that winding number through a frequency conversion process is notoriously difficult with conventional optics, because the harmonic generation tends to scramble or multiply the topological charge in uncontrolled ways. Topology imprinting sidesteps the problem by design, ensuring the generated harmonic radiation inherits the structure of its parent field.</p>
<p>Even more ambitiously, the review highlights experiments involving optical Hopf links, structured fields in which the lines of polarization or phase are knotted and linked like elements of mathematical topology. That such configurations can be generated and preserved through nonlinear conversion in an ultrathin metasurface underscores the power of the approach: the topological character of light, once considered fragile and difficult to control, becomes a transferable property that survives the birth of new frequencies. This opens the possibility of building frequency-multiplexed structured-light systems, in which the same topological information is carried simultaneously at multiple wavelengths, each generated within a single flat optical element.</p>
<p>The implications stretch across several domains of photonics. In optical communications, structured light offers an additional degree of freedom for multiplexing, potentially increasing the information capacity of free-space and fiber links by encoding data in the spatial structure of beams rather than only in their intensity or wavelength. In holography, metasurfaces that imprint topology across frequencies could produce compact, wavelength-agile holographic displays and projectors. In quantum photonics, preserving the structure of entangled photons through nonlinear processes is essential for building quantum networks that exploit high-dimensional spatial modes, and topology imprinting provides a natural mechanism for achieving that preservation. Advanced imaging systems, meanwhile, stand to benefit from structured illumination patterns that can be generated at multiple wavelengths without swapping optical components. As Dr. Litchinitser notes, nonlinear topology imprinting can pave the way toward compact photonic platforms capable of generating complex structured light fields, with impact across holography, optical communications, quantum photonics, and advanced imaging.</p>
<p>None of this is to say the field is without obstacles, and the review is candid about them. The efficiency of nonlinear frequency conversion in ultrathin metasurfaces remains relatively low, a consequence of the short interaction length: light passes through a film only a few hundred nanometers thick, leaving little distance over which the nonlinear polarization can accumulate. The palette of available nonlinear materials imposes further limits, since many high-performance nonlinear crystals are difficult to integrate into nanoscale resonator geometries, and some promising materials suffer from absorption or damage at the relevant intensities. Scaling these devices and integrating them into on-chip photonic platforms presents its own engineering challenges, from thermal management to coupling efficiency between the metasurface and surrounding waveguides. These are the kinds of problems that will determine whether topology imprinting remains a laboratory curiosity or matures into a commercial technology.</p>
<p>The authors chart several promising paths forward. The development of low-loss, highly nonlinear materials tailored for metasurface integration could dramatically raise conversion efficiencies, and the incorporation of active and tunable functionalities, such as electro-optic or thermo-optic control, would allow a single device to switch between different structured-light outputs in real time. Machine learning is identified as another key direction: inverse-design algorithms trained on electromagnetic simulations can explore resonator geometries far beyond human intuition, optimizing devices for simultaneous efficiency, bandwidth, and topological fidelity. Combined with steady advances in nanofabrication, these tools could shrink the gap between the theoretical promise of topology imprinting and the practical demands of deployed photonic systems.</p>
<p>Taken together, the review positions topology imprinting as one of the more consequential ideas to emerge in nonlinear wavefront engineering in recent years. By treating the topology of light not as a fixed property of a particular beam but as a transferable imprint that survives frequency conversion, the concept unifies two previously separate goals: efficient nonlinear generation and precise spatial control. The result is a vision of photonic hardware in which complex, topologically rich light fields can be produced at multiple wavelengths by flat, compact devices no thicker than a human hair. If the materials and integration challenges identified by the Duke team can be overcome, the technology could find its way into everything from high-capacity communication links and quantum processors to climate-relevant sensing and imaging systems, fulfilling the promise that structured light has held since its earliest demonstrations.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Topology imprinting in nonlinear metasurfaces for generating and preserving structured light across frequencies</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> IEEE study explores new photonics breakthrough: topology imprinting in nonlinear metasurfaces</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> IEEE study explores new photonics breakthrough: topology imprinting in nonlinear metasurfaces. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1143867" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> nonlinear optics, metasurfaces, structured light, topology imprinting, harmonic generation, optical vortices, orbital angular momentum, photonics, nanophotonics, quantum photonics, holography, IEEE Photonics Journal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">234530</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Light&#8217;s Blind Spots Are Reshaping Microscopy, Sensing and Communication</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/how-lights-blind-spots-are-reshaping-microscopy-sensing-and-communication/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 15:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diffraction limit bypass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electromagnetic field properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free-space and fiber-optic information transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interdisciplinary research in wave physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[light confinement techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metasurfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MINFLUX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanometric displacement sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical communication advancements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical coronagraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical singularities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical vortices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optical vortices and dislocations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orbital angular momentum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phase and polarization in light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polarization singularities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singular optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[singularity engineering in optics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structured light]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super-resolution microscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetic dimensions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[topological charge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualization of optical singularities]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=206279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review distills fifty years of singular optics into a single design framework, showing how points where light becomes undefined are engineered for super-resolution microscopy, nanometric sensing, astronomy and high-capacity communication.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Light, for all its brilliance, has blind spots. At certain points in an electromagnetic field, a fundamental property such as the phase or the polarization simply ceases to be defined, and the field value drops to zero. These loci of undefinedness, known as optical singularities, are far more than mathematical curiosities. They confine light into the tightest possible features, wrap themselves in the steepest field gradients that wave physics allows, and are now exploited to beat the diffraction limit, to sense nanometric displacements, and to carry ever more information through free space and optical fiber. Yet for fifty years the field has grown in a tangled way, accumulating an expanding and partially inconsistent menagerie of names — vortices, dislocations, C-points, L-lines, Möbius strips, skyrmions and more — that has obscured a surprisingly simple underlying picture. A new review from researchers at Harvard University, Stanford University and Nanyang Technological University, published in Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering, sets out to untangle that picture and to turn singularity observation into singularity engineering.</p>
<p>The review, written by Soon Wei Daniel Lim, Christina M. Spaegele and Federico Capasso, argues that the proliferating nomenclature has concealed two crucial facts. First, only a small number of field parameters — phase, polarization, coherence, correlation, spin density — can actually become undefined in an optical field. Second, once the naming clutter is stripped away, every singular field reduces to a finite set of fundamental, generic singularities whose shapes and survival rules follow directly from topology. The authors present an application-driven and mathematically accessible framework in which a singularity is described through two spaces: a configuration space that specifies where it is located in the light field, and a condition space that specifies which combinations of field quantities must vanish there. The relationship between the dimensions of these two spaces determines what geometric form a singularity can take, whether a point, a line, a surface, or something stranger.</p>
<p>The intellectual roots of this framework reach back to 1974, when John Nye and Michael Berry published their founding paper on dislocations in wave trains, showing that interfering waves inevitably contain lines where the amplitude vanishes and the phase becomes undefined, and classifying their local geometry by analogy with edge and screw dislocations in crystals. Throughout the 1980s, Hajnal and Nye extended the description from scalar waves to full three-dimensional vector fields, identifying which polarization features are structurally stable: lines of circular polarization, lines of linear polarization, and surfaces separating regions of opposite handedness. Catastrophe optics, developed by Berry and Upstill, connected the bright folds and caustics of ray optics to the same underlying mathematics of degeneracy. Over subsequent decades, researchers catalogued polarization flowers, monstars, lemons and stars, fractional-charge vortices, knotted and linked phase singularities, optical Möbius strips, and most recently electromagnetic skyrmions and hopfions — topological textures in which every combination of polarization state and phase occurs exactly once within a confined volume of light.</p>
<p>The Harvard-led review&#8217;s central contribution is to show that this entire catalogue obeys a single organizing principle. The dimension of the configuration space minus the dimension of the condition space — often called the co-dimension — dictates both the shape of a generic singularity and its robustness. A phase singularity in ordinary three-dimensional space requires a single complex condition to vanish, giving co-dimension two, which manifests as a vortex line threading through the field. A polarization singularity such as a C-point requires two real conditions, again co-dimension two. More exotic beasts demand more: the topological spin defects of light reported in 2022 are points where all three components of the spin density vanish simultaneously, a rare co-dimension-three singularity surrounded by a spin pattern that winds around it and carries a quantized charge. In the review&#8217;s framework, designing a singularity becomes a matter of choosing which conditions to make vanish and where, rather than searching blindly through named structures.</p>
<p>Robustness, the authors emphasize, is a topological question, not an accident of geometry. A structurally stable singularity is displaced by small perturbations rather than destroyed, provided it carries a topological charge of plus or minus one. Stability also demands that the perturbation fall within the singularity&#8217;s condition space and remain below a limiting magnitude; push beyond that, and the singularity can annihilate with a partner of opposite charge or fragment into multiple lower-order defects. This principle explains why optical vortices survive atmospheric turbulence and imperfect optics while remaining detectably unchanged in their winding, and why higher-order vortices with topological charges greater than one are intrinsically unstable, splitting into rows of singly charged vortices under the slightest elliptical perturbation. It also explains why unstable singularities — such as the singularity sheets demonstrated by the same Harvard group, in which phase or polarization is undefined across an entire two-dimensional surface with heart-shaped cross-sections — can be engineered deliberately but are fragile by design, vanishing under the smallest deviation.</p>
<p>That shift from observing singularities to building them on purpose has been accelerated by metasurfaces, flat optical devices patterned with subwavelength nanostructures that impart arbitrary phase and polarization profiles to incoming light. The review surveys two complementary design routes. In the forward approach, well-understood optical elements are composed — spatial light modulators, q-plates, computer-generated holograms, spiral phase plates — until the desired singular structure emerges. In the inverse approach, the device is cast as an optimization problem, with algorithms tuning nanostructure geometries until the field satisfies the target conditions, steep gradients and all. Metasurfaces make it possible to realize both approaches on a single flat surface, and have been used to generate point singularity arrays, phase and polarization singularity sheets, momentum-space polarization vortices centered at bound states in the continuum, and arbitrarily oriented spatiotemporal optical vortices using transmission nodal lines. The steep field gradients surrounding a singularity are as valuable to applications as the undefined point itself, because they translate tiny displacements into large, measurable signal changes.</p>
<p>The application portfolio is strikingly broad. In stimulated-emission-depletion fluorescence microscopy, a doughnut-shaped beam with a phase singularity at its center depletes fluorescence everywhere except a sub-diffraction spot, enabling far-field imaging well beyond the classical resolution limit. The MINFLUX technique inverted that logic: instead of fitting the center of a bright spot, it scans the dark center of a singular doughnut across a single fluorescent molecule, locating the emitter with roughly twenty-two times fewer photons and reaching nanometer resolution, fast enough to watch motor proteins stepping in living cells. In astronomical imaging, vortex coronagraphs place a phase singularity at a telescope&#8217;s focus so that light from an on-axis star is removed across the entire exit pupil while light from a dim off-axis companion passes through — an approach now operating at the W. M. Keck Observatory. Optical &#8216;rulers&#8217; exploit the steep gradients near singularities to detect nanometric and even picometric displacements. Vortex beams trap and rotate particles, guide atoms in dark optical traps, and drill cleaner microstructures in laser machining, while orbital angular momentum multiplexing has carried terabit-scale data rates through free space and fiber, and twisted photons now underpin high-dimensional quantum key distribution protocols.</p>
<p>What remains out of reach, the authors argue, is constrained by a blunt fact: ordinary space offers only three dimensions, and some singularities need more. A topologically protected polarization singularity requiring four conditions to vanish cannot be stable in three-dimensional space, but becomes stable once wavelength is added as a fourth coordinate — a synthetic dimension. Experiments in 2023 demonstrated exactly this, realizing a co-dimension-four singularity stabilized by treating wavelength as an extra dimension of configuration space, and making synthetic dimensions a practical design resource rather than a theoretical abstraction. Spatiotemporal vortex beams, in which the singularity lives in the space-time plane mixing position and frequency, and optical skyrmions and hopfions, whose full topological textures extend beyond any collection of singularity lines, point the same direction: toward singular structures defined in spaces assembled from wavelength, angle of incidence, time, and spatial coordinates simultaneously.</p>
<p>Measuring such higher-dimensional fields will itself demand new instrumentation, the review notes, because conventional polarimetry cannot resolve the full three-dimensional vector structure surrounding a singularity. Polarimetric sensors able to map complete field distributions — including the longitudinal components and the spin density — will be needed to verify the winding, the charge, and the stability of next-generation singular fields. If those tools mature, the payoff could extend from sharper microscopes and sturdier communication channels to reconfigurable structured light whose topology is guaranteed by mathematics rather than by engineering tolerances. The review&#8217;s unifying message is that singular optics, after half a century of accumulating names, finally possesses a design grammar: choose the spaces, count the dimensions, check the charge, and the singularity&#8217;s shape, stability and fate follow. Light&#8217;s blind spots, it turns out, are among the most information-rich places in all of optics.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Multidimensional optical singularities and their applications in structured light</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Multidimensional optical singularities and their applications</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Lim, S. W. D., Spaegele, C. M., &amp; Capasso, F. (2026). Multidimensional optical singularities and their applications. <em>Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44287-026-00331-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s44287-026-00331-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44287-026-00331-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s44287-026-00331-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> optical singularities, singular optics, structured light, metasurfaces, optical vortices, polarization singularities, topological charge, synthetic dimensions, super-resolution microscopy, MINFLUX, optical coronagraph, orbital angular momentum</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">206279</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
