The editorial, authored by Juan Lupiáñez of the University of Granada, Fernando Gabriel Luna of the National University of Córdoba, and Daniel Smilek of the University of Waterloo, frames a Research Topic that gathers historical analyses, conceptual reviews, empirical studies, theoretical proposals, and methodological innovations. The editors argue that no single theoretical framework proposed so far fully accounts for the complex reality of the vigilance decrement. Instead, contemporary research is characterized by a productive debate among resource-depletion accounts, resource-control models, opportunity-cost frameworks, motivational approaches, and theories emphasizing mind wandering and attentional disengagement. Progress, they contend, increasingly depends on pairing theoretical innovation with novel analytical and methodological approaches.

The first major theme emerging from the collection concerns the nature of vigilance itself. The term is often used interchangeably with sustained attention, alertness, and arousal, sometimes referring to the same cognitive process and other times to different capacities or behaviors. Hemmerich and colleagues provide a comprehensive review that revisits these conceptual boundaries and synthesizes the theoretical, contextual, and neural foundations of vigilance. Their analysis complements a historical perspective from Klein and Feltmate, who trace how explanations of the vigilance decrement have evolved since Mackworth’s seminal studies during the Second World War era. Together, these contributions remind researchers that theoretical progress depends not only on new data but also on conceptual clarity about the cognitive processes under investigation.

The second theme concerns the mechanisms underlying the decrement. Traditional resource theories attribute performance decline to the depletion of limited attentional resources, as though the brain were a battery draining with use. Newer frameworks reject simple depletion. Resource-control models argue that a progressive failure of executive control allows attention to drift toward task-unrelated thoughts, while opportunity-cost and motivational theories view the decrement as a cost-benefit decision in which individuals continually evaluate the value of task engagement against alternative mental activities. The evidence increasingly favors these dynamic accounts over static depletion.

Studies by Drody and colleagues and by Schwartzman and colleagues provide direct evidence bearing on this debate. In sustained attention tasks, increasing motivation and interest attenuated time-related increases in media multitasking and mind wandering while also mitigating time-related decreases in performance. Rather than reflecting depleted cognitive capacity, these findings underscore the role of motivational factors and attentional priorities in sustaining prolonged engagement. Schwartzman’s team further showed that performance decline is accompanied by more frequent task-unrelated thoughts, even during short intervals, suggesting that the mind begins disengaging almost immediately after a task starts.

Extending this work into more ecological contexts, Zheng and colleagues identified distinct EEG synchronization signatures that differentiate on-task states from mind wandering during continuous performance. These neural markers demonstrate the feasibility of tracking attentional states in real time, an approach with considerable promise for both theoretical investigation and practical intervention in safety-critical settings. Shelat and colleagues showed that response-time patterns can identify impending attentional lapses and episodes of mind wandering before they fully manifest, opening the door to predictive systems that could alert operators before dangerous lapses occur.

Importantly, the editors argue that future research should expand explanations of vigilance failures to include an understanding of why the mind disengages from the task at hand. Task-unrelated thought may not simply impose performance costs; it may also serve adaptive functions, including memory consolidation and creative thinking. Recent studies suggest that mind wandering during implicit learning is associated with improved extraction of hidden probabilistic patterns, and that self-generated thought contributes to creativity. Understanding both the costs and benefits of mind wandering may therefore be essential for explaining why the vigilance decrement is so pervasive in everyday life and so hard to avoid.

Theoretical innovation in the collection extends beyond the resource versus motivation debate. In a provocative contribution, Jagacinski proposes an Adjustable Wave Model in which attentional deployment is conceptualized as a spatio-temporal sampling process operating at adjustable frequencies. Curley and colleagues combined electrophysiological measures with computational simulations to investigate interactions among working memory, cognitive control, and performance monitoring, while Matthews and colleagues highlighted challenges in measuring temporal changes in attentional networks at the individual level. These studies reflect a broader shift toward multilevel accounts linking behavior, neural activity, computational mechanisms, and individual differences.

The third major theme concerns methodological innovation. Many traditional vigilance paradigms rely on overall detection rates or aggregate performance measures that provide a general index of attention span but limited insight into the mechanisms responsible for decline. Skinner and Giesbrecht advocate broader application of signal detection theory to distinguish declines in perceptual sensitivity from shifts in decision criterion, a distinction that resonates with longstanding debates revisited by Klein and Feltmate. The field is also witnessing a recent shift from classic signal detection metrics toward psychometric curves as indices of vigilance loss, alongside ex-Gaussian modeling of reaction-time distributions. Notably, McCarley and colleagues deconstructed the vigilance decrement and found changes in bias, lapse rate, and guess rate over time, but not in perceptual sensitivity, suggesting that what looks like fading perception may actually be shifting decisions and increasing lapses.

Taken together, the contributions portray a field undergoing both conceptual refinement and methodological transformation. Rather than supporting a single explanatory framework, the collection suggests that vigilance decrements arise from the interplay of attentional control, motivational dynamics, opportunity-cost evaluations, mind wandering, environmental influences, and neurocognitive constraints. Future theoretical progress will likely depend less on identifying a single dominant explanation than on developing integrative models that capture how these factors interact across tasks, individuals, and contexts. For a phenomenon that touches nearly every prolonged human endeavor, from monitoring automated transit networks to sustaining focus in digital education, that integrated understanding cannot come soon enough.

Subject of Research: Editorial: Advances in vigilance research: exploring novel theoretical models and analytical approaches on the analysis of the vigilance decrement

Article Title: Editorial: Advances in vigilance research: exploring novel theoretical models and analytical approaches on the analysis of the vigilance decrement

Article References: Lupiáñez, J., Luna, F. G., & Smilek, D. (2026). Editorial: Advances in vigilance research: exploring novel theoretical models and analytical approaches on the analysis of the vigilance decrement. Frontiers in Cognition, 5, Article 1948924. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcogn.2026.1948924

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.3389/fcogn.2026.1948924

Keywords: Editorial, Advances, vigilance, research, exploring, novel, theoretical, models, analytical, approaches, analysis, decrement