<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>oil spills &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/oil-spills/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 13:55:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Forever Chemicals and Cancer: Nigeria Faces a Growing Toxic Burden</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/forever-chemicals-and-cancer-nigeria-faces-a-growing-toxic-burden/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathaniel Bowman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 13:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioaccumulation of toxic chemicals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endocrine disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental health Nigeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forever chemicals and human health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health effects of flame retardants and pesticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of POPs on ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial chemicals and cancer risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-range transport of toxic pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niger Delta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigeria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigeria's environmental pollution crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[persistent organic pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pesticides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PFAS in consumer products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public health policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation of persistent organic pollutants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stockholm Convention]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=230126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review links Nigeria's rising cancer burden to persistent organic pollutants from oil spills, pesticides, e-waste, and industrial emissions, while exposing major gaps in regulation and data.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Persistent organic pollutants, the synthetic compounds often called forever chemicals, have become one of the most troubling environmental health stories of our time, and a new review published in Discover Toxicology argues that Nigeria sits at the center of the crisis. The study, led by Daniel Omeodisemi Omokpariola of Nnamdi Azikiwe University together with colleagues at the National Agency for Food and Drug Administration and Control, examines how these chemicals accumulate in ecosystems and human tissue, and how that accumulation may be feeding into the country&#8217;s rising cancer burden. Because POPs resist chemical, biological, and photolytic degradation, they persist in soils, water bodies, and the atmosphere for decades, bioaccumulate through the food web, and can travel long distances through the atmosphere, making them a uniquely stubborn public health problem.</p>
<p>The chemical family is broad and familiar. It includes per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS, used in non-stick cookware, firefighting foams, and water-resistant fabrics; polychlorinated biphenyls, once prized as industrial insulators; polybrominated biphenyls and brominated flame retardants; polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; dioxins; organochlorine and organophosphate pesticides; and phthalates. The International Agency for Research on Cancer classifies PCBs and dioxin-like PCBs as Group 1 carcinogens, meaning they are known to cause cancer in humans, while PBBs are rated Group 2A, probably carcinogenic. Epidemiological work worldwide has tied PFAS exposure to kidney, testicular, and breast cancers, and the review notes that these compounds can disrupt endocrine function, alter immune responses, and damage DNA. Their lipophilic character is central to the danger: they dissolve readily into fatty tissue, producing prolonged internal exposure that raises cancer risk over years or decades through genotoxicity, endocrine disruption, and immunotoxicity.</p>
<p>What makes Nigeria&#8217;s situation acute is the convergence of rapid industrialization, intensive agriculture, and weak chemical management. The Niger Delta, one of the most polluted regions on Earth, is saturated with hydrocarbons from oil exploration, including PAHs and BTEX compounds, both carcinogenic groups. Oil spills and gas flaring release these chemicals directly into the air, water, and soil of communities that depend on fishing and subsistence farming. Agriculture adds another layer: despite international and local bans on substances such as DDT, aldrin, benzene hexachloride, calcium cyanide, and dieldrin, residues of these organochlorine pesticides persist in Nigerian soils and water, and in 2023 the national regulator NAFDAC listed numerous banned pesticides that continue to proliferate. Urbanization compounds the problem. In cities such as Lagos, Kano, Abuja, and Port Harcourt, informal e-waste recycling, which often involves burning electronic components to recover metals, releases brominated flame retardants and dioxins into the environment.</p>
<p>The review quantifies the scale of oil-related contamination using data from the National Oil Spill Detection and Response Agency&#8217;s spill monitor, cross-checked against government, industry, and news sources. In 2023 alone, Nigeria recorded 1,162 oil spills, losing 18,747 barrels of oil, including 3 major and 12 medium spills. The preceding years were scarcely better: 794 spills and 47,732 barrels lost in 2022, 613 spills and 40,707 barrels in 2021, and more than 550 spills in each year from 2017 through 2020. Studies cited in the review found PCB concentrations in Niger Delta sediments exceeding international safety limits and elevated PAH levels in water and sediments, contaminants that are known carcinogens and have been linked to respiratory problems and cancer among local populations.</p>
<p>Regional case studies paint a consistent national picture. In Lagos, industrial discharge, urban runoff, and poor waste disposal have loaded the lagoon with organochlorine pesticides and PCBs, while traffic congestion, biomass burning, and industrial emissions foul the air; one analysis of West African cities attributed roughly a third of fine particulate pollution to road transport and a quarter to biomass fuels. Port Harcourt&#8217;s notorious soot, driven by illegal refineries and poorly operated flares, pushes particulate levels far beyond World Health Organization guidelines. In Kano, the Challawa River, used for irrigation and domestic purposes, carries high pollutant loads from tanneries and industry. Onitsha, Warri, and Abeokuta each show elevated PAHs and PCBs in air, water, or soil. Satellite-based trend analysis by the research team found that fine particulate matter, PM2.5, dominated Nigeria&#8217;s atmospheric pollution profile, accounting for just over half of the measured particulate burden, with industrial emissions driving the formation of volatile organic compounds that act as precursors to POPs.</p>
<p>The epidemiological evidence, though incomplete, points in a worrying direction. Breast cancer is now the most common cancer among Nigerian women, and studies cited in the review found higher incidence among women living in areas of heavy industrial pollution. Liver cancer rates correlate with PAH and PCB levels in the Niger Delta, where oil exploration is concentrated. Prostate cancer, the most common cancer among Nigerian men, has been associated in one review with high environmental POP levels, and colorectal cancer risk appears elevated among people exposed to organochlorine pesticides and PAHs. A World Bank assessment of air pollution costs in Lagos estimated that children under five account for 60 percent of pollution-related deaths there, with an estimated 11,200 premature deaths in 2018, and ranked lung cancer among the leading health effects. Data from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation show neoplasms climbing from ninth among causes of death in Nigeria in 2000 to sixth by 2010, where they have remained.</p>
<p>At the molecular level, the review explains how these chemicals plausibly drive carcinogenesis. POPs generate oxidative stress, an imbalance between reactive oxygen species and the body&#8217;s antioxidant defenses, producing radicals that damage DNA and activate signaling pathways such as NF-kB, Nrf2, Akt/PI3K/mTOR, MAPK, and p53, which regulate cell growth, repair, and apoptosis. Carcinogens such as PAHs and PCBs also form DNA adducts, chemical bonds between pollutants and DNA that cause mutations and genomic instability; when the burden is high, nucleotide and base excision repair pathways are overwhelmed. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals like dioxins and phthalates mimic or block hormones, altering receptor expression and metabolism in ways that promote hormone-dependent cancers of the breast, prostate, and thyroid. A systematic review of 95 studies found that POPs measured in breast adipose tissue were more clearly associated with higher breast cancer incidence and worse prognosis than measurements in blood, suggesting that tissue-specific accumulation matters.</p>
<p>Establishing firm causality in Nigeria, however, is hampered by a data crisis. Cancer registries are underfunded and sparse; the well-regarded Ibadan Cancer Registry is hospital-based and may not represent the wider population. Many cases go unreported, particularly in rural areas where diagnostic facilities are scarce and patients often present at advanced stages. Stigma, the cost of treatment, and reliance on traditional healing further suppress reporting, and inconsistent data collection methods make regional comparisons difficult. The informal economy, including oil theft and unregulated refining, releases pollutants that are never monitored. The authors acknowledge that these limitations constrain their own conclusions and call for population-based registries and standardized surveillance as prerequisites for precise causal research.</p>
<p>The burden falls unevenly. Rural communities face pesticide residues in food and drinking water and, in oil-producing regions, direct exposure to volatile organic compounds and gas flaring emissions. Urban slums sit beside industrial zones, landfills, and e-waste dumps, with contaminated water, unregulated cooking fuels, and overcrowding amplifying exposure. Poverty limits access to diagnosis and treatment, and lower educational attainment reduces awareness of chemical hazards, widening health disparities between socioeconomic groups. On the policy front, Nigeria has ratified the Stockholm, Rotterdam, Basel, and Bamako conventions and maintains a regulatory architecture spanning NESREA, NAFDAC, and other agencies, but enforcement is undermined by capacity constraints, limited political will, and low public awareness. The review recommends stronger legal frameworks aligned with international treaties, monitoring enhanced by remote sensing and geographic information systems, institutional investment, public education campaigns, and transparent environmental impact reporting. Without such reforms, the authors warn, the country&#8217;s most vulnerable communities will continue to pay the highest price for a pollution problem the world already knows how to prevent.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> The role of persistent organic pollutants in cancer development in Nigeria</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Assessing the role of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in cancer development in Nigeria: environmental exposure, risk factors, and policy gaps</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Omokpariola, D. O., Omokpariola, P. L., Okechukwu, V. U., Okeke, A. P., &amp; Daramola, A. A. (2025). Assessing the role of Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) in cancer development in Nigeria: environmental exposure, risk factors, and policy gaps. <em>Discover Toxicology, 2</em>(1), Article 9. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44339-025-00030-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44339-025-00030-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44339-025-00030-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44339-025-00030-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> persistent organic pollutants, PFAS, cancer, Nigeria, Niger Delta, oil spills, pesticides, e-waste, environmental health, endocrine disruption, Stockholm Convention, public health policy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">230126</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>From Satellites to Superbugs: The New Science of Fighting Oil Spills at Sea</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/from-satellites-to-superbugs-the-new-science-of-fighting-oil-spills-at-sea/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 07:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aquatic pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioremediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bioremediation of marine oil spills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biosurfactants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological impact of oil spills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[historical oil spill case studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrocarbon microbial degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in situ burning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term environmental effects of oil spills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning in environmental monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mycoremediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill booms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spill response strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil spills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oil-spill cleanup technologies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote sensing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote sensing for oil spill detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[satellite imaging for oil spill tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable development goals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetic-aperture radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water-in-oil emulsions]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=226510</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A comprehensive new review finds that bioremediation combined with machine-learning-enhanced remote sensing offers the most sustainable path for detecting and cleaning up oil spills in aquatic environments.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When oil spills into the ocean, the damage begins within minutes. Lighter hydrocarbons evaporate, the slick spreads into a thin rainbow sheen, waves whip the remaining oil into a water-in-oil emulsion, and microbes start chewing through the hydrocarbon molecules. A new comprehensive review published in Environmental Science and Pollution Research by Mrinmoy Dhar, Amiya Ojha, Palash Dey and Deeplina Das brings together decades of oil spill research into a single framework, combining historical case studies, bibliometric analysis, oil behavior science, detection technologies and remediation strategies. Its central conclusion is striking: bioremediation emerges as the most environmentally sustainable and cost-effective way to clean spilled oil, while remote sensing paired with machine learning offers the greatest promise for finding and tracking slicks in the first place.</p>
<p>The review&#8217;s authors, based at ICFAI University Tripura and the National Institute of Technology Agartala in India, ground their analysis in the hard lessons of history. Catastrophes such as the Exxon Valdez, Deepwater Horizon and Hebei Spirit spills have left long-term ecological fingerprints that researchers are still documenting today. Comparative studies cited in the review show that spilled oil can persist in sediments and shorelines for decades, affecting everything from seabird populations to mangrove forests. The 1990-91 Gulf War, for example, left Iranian mangroves degraded for years, while the Prestige disaster off Galicia reshaped both coastal ecosystems and regional politics. Even relatively recent incidents, such as a sanctioned tanker spilling oil in the Baltic Sea near Gotland, demonstrate that the threat has not receded.</p>
<p>Understanding why oil spills are so damaging requires understanding how oil behaves once it hits water. The review details the physicochemical properties of spilled crude, including density, viscosity and the composition of hydrocarbon fractions, and explains how weathering processes transform the slick over time. Evaporation strips the lightest components, leaving behind denser residues that can sink or persist. Emulsification, driven by wave action, can multiply the volume of the pollutant several-fold. Oil also interacts with suspended sediments to form oil-particle aggregates, and recent work shows that marine bacteria play a surprising role in the formation and migration of these aggregates, potentially accelerating the natural removal of oil from the water column. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, the most toxic fraction, bioaccumulate and travel through marine food webs, reaching coral reef ecosystems and, ultimately, human consumers of seafood.</p>
<p>Detecting a slick quickly and accurately is the first battle, and the review devotes extensive attention to the technology involved. Synthetic aperture radar remains the workhorse of satellite-based oil spill detection because oil dampens the small wind-driven ripples on the sea surface, creating dark patches that stand out against the brighter ocean. Sensors operating in the C-band, such as those on Sentinel-1A, have been used to map spills along the east coast of India, while dual-polarized Radarsat-2 and TerraSAR-X imagery can help distinguish mineral oil slicks from look-alike ocean phenomena. Yet radar has well-known pitfalls: low-wind areas, algal blooms and rain cells can all mimic oil, producing false positives that complicate response decisions.</p>
<p>Optical and hyperspectral remote sensing complement radar by characterizing what the slick actually is. Hyperspectral sensors can identify different types of spilled oil and, in the shortwave infrared domain, estimate slick thickness and emulsion content. Thermal infrared imaging adds another layer of discrimination, and recent research combines hyperspectral data with thermal infrared to improve classification accuracy. For submerged oil, which is far harder to detect than floating slicks, high-spectral polarization detection based on multi-dimensional information represents a cutting-edge frontier. Laser-induced fluorescence, deployed from ships, aircraft and even unmanned underwater vehicles, exploits the fact that petroleum compounds fluoresce when excited by ultraviolet light, allowing responders to map oil that other sensors miss.</p>
<p>The review also highlights how machine learning is transforming spill detection. Algorithms trained on satellite imagery can classify slicks, estimate their thickness and predict their drift, dramatically improving the accuracy and efficiency of response operations. Drone-based fluorosensors and unmanned surface vehicles carrying laser fluorosensors extend monitoring to scales and conditions that crewed aircraft cannot safely reach. In situ sensors are advancing too: dual-modality capacitive-ultrasonic devices can measure floating oil thickness directly, capacitance arrays can detect small leaks from underground tanks, and fiber-optic hydrophones track acoustic signatures in the water column. The authors argue that integrating these active and passive technologies into unified monitoring systems, enhanced by artificial intelligence, should be a research priority.</p>
<p>Once oil is found, the cleanup toolbox offers several options, each with trade-offs. Physical containment with floating booms is the classic first response, but booms perform poorly under strong waves and currents, and structural analysis shows their effectiveness depends heavily on hydrodynamic conditions. Skimmers, from weir-type designs to sponge-covered drums with advanced oleophilic coatings, recover oil mechanically, while sorbents, including hydrophobic chitosan-based materials and natural by-products, soak up slicks at small scales. Chemical dispersants break slicks into droplets that microbes can degrade faster, though their effectiveness in stimulating biodegradation depends on careful formulation and application. In situ burning can remove large volumes of oil quickly, and offshore field experiments have quantified both its burn efficiency and its emissions, but the technique raises air quality concerns and is weather-dependent.</p>
<p>Against these options, the review finds bioremediation to be the most sustainable and economical path. Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria, including metabolically versatile strains such as Rhodococcus erythropolis isolated from spill-affected lakes, can be deployed as native or engineered consortia, sometimes immobilized on carriers like rice husk biochar to boost their performance in seawater. Biosurfactants produced by microbes such as Pseudomonas cepacia help disperse oil with low ecotoxicity. Fungi contribute through mycoremediation, with species like Trametes, Ganoderma and Trichoderma breaking down stubborn petroleum compounds in soils and sediments, while microalgae such as Nannochloropsis oculata and Chlorella vulgaris can degrade dissolved oil in coastal waters. Plant-based approaches, from duckweed in constructed wetlands to mangroves and salt-marsh grasses, round out the biological toolkit.</p>
<p>Looking forward, the authors identify clear research gaps. They call for integrated monitoring systems that fuse satellite, aerial and in situ data, for environmentally sustainable remediation technologies that avoid trading one form of pollution for another, and for predictive modeling tools that can forecast spill trajectories and ecological consequences before responders arrive on scene. They also connect the agenda to global policy, noting that better oil spill management directly supports United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 6 on clean water and sanitation and 14 on life below water. The bibliometric analysis embedded in the review maps publication trends and emerging themes, giving researchers a roadmap of where the field is heading and where investment is most needed.</p>
<p>The message for policymakers and the public is that oil spill response is entering a data-driven, biology-powered era. Satellites and artificial intelligence can now spot a slick within hours, and carefully managed microbial communities can finish the job that booms and skimmers begin. No single technology is sufficient on its own, but the review makes a compelling case that combining smart detection with sustainable bioremediation offers the best chance of protecting marine and freshwater ecosystems from one of humanity&#8217;s most persistent forms of pollution.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Oil spill detection technologies and sustainable remediation strategies in aquatic environments</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Managing oil spills in aquatic environments: detection techniques and sustainable remediation strategies</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Dhar, M., Ojha, A., Dey, P., &amp; Das, D. (2026). Managing oil spills in aquatic environments: detection techniques and sustainable remediation strategies. <em>Environmental Science and Pollution Research</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38257-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38257-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-026-38257-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11356-026-38257-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> oil spills, bioremediation, remote sensing, machine learning, synthetic aperture radar, marine pollution, biosurfactants, mycoremediation, in situ burning, oil spill booms, aquatic pollution, sustainable development goals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">226510</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
