<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nuclear materials &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/nuclear-materials/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:46:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>The Race to Weld the Superalloys Built for Nuclear Reactors and Hypersonic Flight</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/the-race-to-weld-the-superalloys-built-for-nuclear-reactors-and-hypersonic-flight/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:46:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace alloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerospace and nuclear sector materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friction stir welding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-temperature materials for nuclear reactors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history of dispersion-strengthened alloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypersonic flight materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laser welding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanical alloying techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metallurgical design of superalloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoscale oxide particles in superalloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ODS superalloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxide dispersion strengthening]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxide dispersion-strengthened superalloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porosity defects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[post-weld heat treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residual stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superalloy welding challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal resistance of superalloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[welding difficulties in ODS superalloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yttria and alumina dispersion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yttria nanoparticles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zener pinning]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=196555</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review reveals why oxide dispersion-strengthened superalloys, the champions of extreme-temperature engineering, are so difficult to weld and maps the strategies that could finally unlock their use in reactors, turbines, and aerospace.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new comprehensive review has pulled back the curtain on one of the most stubborn engineering bottlenecks of the high-temperature materials age: how to weld superalloys that were deliberately engineered to resist exactly what a welding torch does to them. Oxide dispersion-strengthened superalloys, known across the aerospace and nuclear sectors as ODS superalloys, represent one of the most impressive feats of metallurgical design ever achieved. By scattering billions of nanoscale oxide particles, chiefly yttria and alumina, through a nickel or iron alloy matrix, these materials hold their strength at temperatures where ordinary superalloys simply surrender. Yet the very particles that make them extraordinary also make them notoriously difficult to join, and the new review systematically maps why the challenge has resisted decades of effort.</p>
<p>The origins of the field reach back to the 1960s, when International Nickel Company first dispersed thorium oxide into nickel to create the TD-Ni alloy, an innovation that moved dispersion strengthening from theory into practice. By the early 1970s, the company had adopted mechanical alloying to distribute yttria particles uniformly through the alloy, igniting the rapid development of the ODS family. Traditional superalloys derive their strength from precipitation and solution strengthening, allowing long service at roughly 760 to 1100 degrees Celsius, but above that range the critical nickel aluminide strengthening phase coarsens and dissolves. ODS superalloys sidestep this ceiling entirely. Their oxide particles, with melting points as high as 2410 degrees Celsius for yttria and 2050 degrees Celsius for alumina, remain stable deep into the temperature regime where nothing else survives, making the alloys prime candidates for turbine components, nuclear reactor internals, and other extreme environments.</p>
<p>The strengthening chemistry is elegantly precise. Yttria particles interact with the nickel matrix through remarkably small lattice mismatches, with interplanar spacings differing by only fractions of a nanometer, allowing a cohesive interaction between particle and matrix. Studies comparing yttria and alumina dispersoids in nickel-chromium substrates found the two particles contribute to strength in distinct proportions: yttria relies mainly on Hall-Petch grain refinement and Zener pinning, while alumina contributes predominantly through Hall-Petch strengthening. Dispersion strengthening itself operates through the Orowan mechanism, in which dislocations must bypass immobile particles, leaving loops behind and consuming energy. The strengthening increment scales with the square root of particle volume fraction and inversely with particle radius, which is precisely why the fate of those particles during welding matters so enormously. When particles grow or vanish, the strength advantage evaporates.</p>
<p>The review identifies three interlocking challenges that have limited the engineering deployment of ODS welded joints. The first is the evolution of the oxide particles themselves under welding thermal cycles. Research on friction stir welding of the alloy MA956 documented significant particle agglomeration, with average oxide particle diameters growing from 10.6 nanometers in the base metal to 18.4 and 19.7 nanometers at medium and high heat inputs respectively. Raising tool rotation speed and slowing travel speed intensified the effect, because greater heat input promotes both particle decomposition and increased churning. In fusion welding the problem becomes acute: at molten pool temperatures yttria can decompose into dissolved yttrium and oxygen, which then react with aluminum or titanium in the matrix to form impurity phases, or segregate to grain boundaries and fusion lines, destroying both the Orowan strengthening and the Zener pinning that keep grains fine.</p>
<p>Remarkably, the particles prove unstable even under conditions that are not primarily thermal. In one striking study, friction stir welded MA956 was irradiated with 5 MeV iron ions at doses of 50 to 200 displacements per atom at temperatures between 400 and 500 degrees Celsius. Irradiation barely affected the base metal, but in the weld zones the particle diameter distributions broadened and the peaks shifted to larger sizes, with Ostwald coarsening dominating at 500 degrees Celsius. This means welded ODS components can degrade in service through radiation-enhanced diffusion alone, a sobering finding for reactor designers who count on these alloys to withstand decades of neutron bombardment. The particles, it turns out, are on the move under almost any energetic environment a welded joint will encounter.</p>
<p>The second major challenge is porosity, and here the review reveals a cruel irony. The same Zener pinning that stabilizes fine grains also immobilizes grain boundaries, which normally serve as escape routes for dissolved gases. Trapped gas accumulates into ellipsoidal pores that cluster along the pore walls alongside agglomerated oxide particles. Experiments with pulsed laser welding of ODS Eurofer steel showed large pores and incomplete penetration at short pulse durations, and residual micro-voids even when full penetration was achieved. Comparisons between argon arc welding and electron beam welding of MGH956 found the vacuum-based electron beam process produced fewer pores, since no shielding gas became trapped and the vacuum environment aided gas removal, yet porosity persisted even under vacuum. Molten pool fluid dynamics adds another layer of complexity: in gas tungsten arc welding, Marangoni convection ferries gas to the fusion line, producing chain-like pore distributions, while in laser welding recoil pressure acts directly against gas escape, and the elevated melt viscosity caused by particle pinning makes matters worse.</p>
<p>Third, the review catalogs the degradation of long-term service behavior rooted in residual stress. Because ODS superalloys possess extremely high yield strength, welding residual stresses frequently reach or exceed the yield point of the base material, and the alloys&#8217; particle-pinned dislocation structures resist the relaxation mechanisms that ordinary alloys exploit. Neutron diffraction measurements of friction stir welded MA956 found longitudinal stresses far exceeding transverse stresses, with residual stress in the thermomechanically affected zone reaching as much as 80 percent of the base material strength, and 40 to 50 percent of yield strength at the stir zone center. The consequences are measurable in service: high-temperature fatigue tests of diffusion-bonded joints between ODS alloy MA758 and conventional superalloys showed roughly a 20 percent fatigue strength reduction at 950 degrees Celsius, while creep testing of friction stir welded MA754 revealed significantly reduced creep resistance, though a post-weld heat treatment that coarsened the grain structure partially restored it.</p>
<p>Against these challenges, the review weighs three families of remedies, each with genuine but incomplete power. Process parameter optimization delivers the most mature results in friction stir welding, where defect-free joints in MA754 were achieved at a tool rotation rate of 1000 rpm and a traverse speed of 50.8 millimeters per minute, and where a pseudo-heat index of 100 to 150 was identified as the threshold for fully fused, defect-free welds in MA956. Laser welding of PM1000 achieved optimal quality at heat inputs of 24 to 36 joules per millimeter, and selective laser melting of FeCrAl-ODS alloy reached porosities as low as 0.5 percent with carefully tuned laser power, scanning speed, and hatch spacing. Composition design offers a complementary route: adding filler powders rich in oxide-forming elements to laser welds regenerated fine, uniformly distributed oxide particles in the weld metal, simultaneously raising tensile strength and hardness. Post-weld heat treatment can transform brittle quenched martensite into tempered martensite and restore impact toughness, but it faces a fundamental contradiction, because the temperatures that relieve residual stress also threaten the oxide particles that give the alloy its purpose.</p>
<p>The review closes with a forward-looking agenda that reads like a wish list for the next decade of materials engineering. Novel welding wires could synthesize oxide particles in situ during joining, replenishing what the thermal cycle destroys. In-situ characterization techniques, including transmission electron microscopy coupled with microcalorimetry and synchrotron X-ray imaging, could finally let researchers watch particle coarsening and pore evolution in real time rather than inferring them from post-mortem micrographs. Full life cycle performance databases under combined high temperature, irradiation, and pressure would enable predictive lifetime models for welded components. And artificial intelligence, trained on the fragmented and often incomparable studies that already exist, could rapidly navigate the vast process parameter space to find windows that simultaneously preserve oxide particles, suppress porosity, and control residual stress. For the nuclear reactors, hypersonic vehicles, and next-generation turbines that depend on these remarkable alloys, cracking the welding problem may prove as consequential as inventing the alloys themselves.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Weldability, oxide particle stability, and welding process optimization of oxide dispersion-strengthened superalloys</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Weldability and welding technology of oxide dispersion-strengthened (ODS) superalloys: a review</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Weldability and welding technology of oxide dispersion-strengthened (ODS) superalloys: a review. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44500-026-00003-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44500-026-00003-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44500-026-00003-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44500-026-00003-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> ODS superalloys, welding, oxide dispersion strengthening, friction stir welding, laser welding, yttria nanoparticles, Zener pinning, porosity defects, residual stress, nuclear materials, aerospace alloys, post-weld heat treatment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">196555</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New MoNbTi-Based Alloys Emerge as Tough Candidates for Next-Generation Nuclear Reactors</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-monbti-based-alloys-emerge-as-tough-candidates-for-next-generation-nuclear-reactors/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 21:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced materials for nuclear safety]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alloy screening for nuclear environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arc melting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chaotic atomic landscape in RMPEAs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical disorder effects on radiation damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cubic rate law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[elastic moduli]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Generation IV nuclear reactor materials development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Generation IV reactors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high entropy alloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-temperature corrosion-resistant alloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laves phase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low neutron absorption metals for nuclear applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MoNbTi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MoNbTi alloy for extreme heat resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-principal element alloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutron-resistant metal alloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next-generation nuclear reactor materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxidation resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[radiation defect recombination in refractory alloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[refractory alloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Refractory multi-principal element alloys for nuclear reactors]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=191896</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers systematically screened eight equiatomic MoNbTi-based refractory multi-principal element alloys and identified MoNbTiCrAl as the leading candidate for Generation IV nuclear reactor structural materials.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The race to build Generation IV nuclear reactors has an unsung bottleneck: no metal currently in service can comfortably survive the combination of extreme heat, relentless neutron bombardment and corrosive operating conditions these advanced systems demand. A research team led by Anilas Karimpilakkal at Missouri University of Science and Technology, working with collaborators at Idaho National Laboratory, has now delivered one of the most systematic experimental screenings to date of a family of exotic metals known as refractory multi-principal element alloys, or RMPEAs. Their target was a deliberately simple starting point with profound implications: the equiatomic ternary MoNbTi system and seven of its four- and five-element derivatives, all built exclusively from elements with low thermal neutron absorption cross sections, a non-negotiable requirement for materials that must sit inside a reactor core without poisoning the chain reaction.</p>
<p>Multi-principal element alloys abandon the traditional recipe of one dominant metal with small amounts of alloying additions. Instead, five or so elements are mixed in roughly equal proportions, producing a chaotic atomic landscape of lattice distortion, sluggish diffusion and chemical disorder. That disorder is precisely what excites nuclear materials scientists. Previous studies have shown that such chemical complexity can promote the recombination of radiation-generated defects, suppress void swelling, and limit the formation of dislocation loops — the very failure modes that cripple conventional reactor steels over decades of service. Ferritic body-centered-cubic steels already outperform austenitic alloys in swelling resistance, and the researchers reasoned that fully refractory body-centered-cubic alloys built from molybdenum, niobium and titanium should inherit that advantage while tolerating far higher temperatures, potentially in the 500 to 1000 degrees Celsius window targeted by Generation IV designs.</p>
<p>The team fabricated eight alloys by vacuum arc melting of cold-compacted elemental powders: the base MoNbTi plus quaternary MoNbTiZr, MoNbTiCr, MoNbTiV and MoNbTiAl, and quinary MoNbTiZrV, MoNbTiCrV and MoNbTiCrAl. Titanium getter chips were melted first to scrub oxygen and nitrogen from the argon atmosphere, and each ingot was flipped and remelted at least five times to maximize homogeneity. X-ray diffraction and backscatter electron imaging revealed a striking compositional dependence in the as-cast state. The base alloy MoNbTi and the aluminum-bearing MoNbTiAl emerged with clean single-phase body-centered-cubic matrices, while the remaining six alloys showed pronounced dendritic segregation. Molybdenum, the highest-melting constituent, preferentially populated the bright dendrite cores, whereas lower-melting titanium, vanadium, chromium and zirconium pooled in the inter-dendritic regions. In every chromium-containing alloy, the microscopy and hardness data also betrayed the presence of a brittle TiCr2 Laves phase seated in the dendrite cores, a classic intermetallic culprit for degraded ductility and machining difficulty.</p>
<p>Thermodynamics explained the pattern. Calculations of liquid-phase mixing enthalpies using Miedema&#8217;s scheme showed that zirconium-niobium, chromium-molybdenum and titanium-niobium pairs are mildly immiscible, encouraging segregation, while strongly negative titanium-aluminum, titanium-chromium and titanium-vanadium interactions lock those elements together in the interdendritic zones. Aluminum&#8217;s highly negative mixing enthalpies with titanium, niobium and molybdenum also foreshadowed its destabilizing behavior: when the team solution-treated the alloys — 24 hours at 1500 degrees Celsius for most systems, and 1300 degrees Celsius for MoNbTiZrV, guided by CALPHAD-predicted single-phase windows — MoNbTiAl actually transformed from a single-phase structure into a multiphase one, a reminder that configurational entropy does not always win. Four alloys, MoNbTiZr, MoNbTiCr, MoNbTiV and MoNbTiCrAl, achieved fully homogeneous single-phase matrices after treatment. MoNbTiZrV and MoNbTiCrV became more uniform but retained residual segregation, which the authors attribute to sluggish transformation kinetics rather than true thermodynamic instability.</p>
<p>The mechanical characterization painted an equally nuanced picture. Vickers hardness spanned an impressive range, from 472 VHN for the soft alloy MoNbTiV to 656 VHN for MoNbTiCrAl, the hardest of the set, with the chromium-bearing alloys consistently elevated by their Laves-phase content. Dynamic elastic properties measured by the impulse excitation of vibration technique, benchmarked against a certified 316 stainless steel reference, yielded Young&#8217;s moduli between 141 and 169 gigapascals, shear moduli of 54 to 62 gigapascals, bulk moduli of 114 to 194 gigapascals and Poisson&#8217;s ratios of roughly 0.3 to 0.35. All eight alloys sat below stainless steel in stiffness yet compared favorably with refractory alloys such as MoNbTiTaV and MoNbV reported in the literature. After heat treatment, hardness fell in the alloys that had achieved homogeneous single-phase matrices — fewer phase boundaries means fewer obstacles to dislocation motion — while hardness rose and became more scattered in the multiphase systems, consistent with the retention of hard secondary constituents.</p>
<p>But the headline result came from the oxidation furnace. Generation IV structural materials must resist not only radiation but also relentless attack by hot air and steam, and refractory alloys are notoriously poor oxidizers. Exposed to flowing air at 800 degrees Celsius, the eight alloys split into two dramatic camps. MoNbTiCrAl was the runaway winner, gaining a mere 0.24 milligrams per square centimeter after 24 hours and developing an oxide scale just one micrometer thick. MoNbTiCr and MoNbTiCrV followed with modest gains of 1.37 and 2.39 milligrams per square centimeter respectively, and all three chromium-bearing alloys approximately obeyed a cubic oxidation rate law, an uncommon kinetic regime associated with coupled grain-boundary diffusion, bulk diffusion and oxide grain growth. The base MoNbTi, with a parabolic trend but a 217-micrometer cracked, porous scale rich in loosely adherent TiNb2O7, Nb2O5 and TiO2, showed a worrying upward drift in mass gain that suggests trouble at longer exposures.</p>
<p>At the opposite extreme, vanadium and zirconium proved catastrophic. MoNbTiV absorbed a staggering 217.2 milligrams per square centimeter and was fully oxidized to a porous mass, its thick V-rich upper scale riddled with porosity because vanadium pentoxide, which melts above 675 degrees Celsius, prevents dense protective scale formation. The zirconium alloys fared worst of all: both MoNbTiZr and MoNbTiZrV disintegrated between the 12- and 24-hour marks, exhibiting the dreaded phenomenon of pesting, in which accelerated oxygen ingress through zirconium- and titanium-rich interdendritic channels produces severe exfoliation, cracking and eventual disintegration of the bulk metal. X-ray diffraction of the oxides confirmed the mechanistic story, detecting protective Cr2O3 in all chromium alloys and, uniquely in MoNbTiCrAl, a combined barrier of Cr2O3 and Al2O3 alongside the complex oxide TiNbO4 — a dual-layer defense that mirrors the strategy behind the best oxidation-resistant refractory alloys previously reported, such as TaMoCrTiAl with its CrTaO4 scale.</p>
<p>The authors are careful to frame the work as a screening exercise rather than a final qualification. The oxidation data represent short-term isothermal exposure in laboratory air, and the decisive questions — irradiation performance of these specific compositions in-reactor, long-term corrosion in coolant environments, and elevated-temperature mechanical behavior — remain open. The team also noted that small nitrogen-containing phases, likely picked up during powder handling, were present below roughly five percent in most samples and were judged not to compromise the conclusions. Nevertheless, by systematically connecting composition to microstructure, elastic constants, hardness and oxidation kinetics across eight alloys in a single coordinated study, the work provides exactly the kind of composition-microstructure-property map that alloy designers need before committing to expensive irradiation campaigns.</p>
<p>For the emerging Generation IV reactor fleet — sodium-cooled fast reactors, molten salt designs and very-high-temperature gas systems — the message is clear. Chromium is the friend, aluminum its powerful ally, and together they transform a vulnerable refractory metal into something approaching a viable core material. Zirconium and vanadium, despite their low neutron cross sections, are oxidation liabilities to be avoided or tightly managed. MoNbTiCrAl, combining low density, the highest hardness, elevated elastic moduli and an extraordinary resistance to high-temperature air attack, now stands as the leading candidate from this family, a base composition awaiting optimization and, ultimately, the neutron bombardment tests that will decide whether chaotic multi-element metals can carry the next era of nuclear power.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Phase evolution, mechanical properties and high-temperature oxidation behavior of MoNbTi-based refractory multi-principal element alloys for Generation IV nuclear reactors.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Phase evolution, mechanical properties and high temperature oxidation behavior of novel equi-atomic Mo-Nb-Ti-based refractory MPEA for Gen IV reactor applications</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Karimpilakkal, A., Schulthess, J. L., Jalan, V., Wen, H., Liou, F., &amp; Newkirk, J. W. (2026). Phase evolution, mechanical properties and high temperature oxidation behavior of novel equi-atomic Mo-Nb-Ti-based refractory MPEA for Gen IV reactor applications. <em>Journal of Materials Science: Metallurgy, 1</em>(1), Article 19. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44492-026-00019-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44492-026-00019-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44492-026-00019-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44492-026-00019-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> refractory alloys, multi-principal element alloys, high-entropy alloys, MoNbTi, Generation IV reactors, oxidation resistance, Laves phase, elastic moduli, pesting, arc melting, nuclear materials, cubic rate law</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">191896</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
