<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>no-tillage &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/no-tillage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:04:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>No-Tillage Soils Let Sugarcane Roots Push Through Compaction and Drought, Study Finds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/no-tillage-soils-let-sugarcane-roots-push-through-compaction-and-drought-study-finds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biopores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop modeling and soil physical properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought resilience in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydric stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of soil structure on root development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term no-tillage farming benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macroporosity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no-tillage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[No-tillage soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oxisol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[penetration resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-soil interaction under physical stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root elongation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[root growth modelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil compaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil compaction effects on crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil disturbance vs. preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil moisture and root elongation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil pore network architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugarcane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sugarcane root growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable sugarcane cultivation practices]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=220126</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A long-term Brazilian field experiment shows that preserved no-tillage soil structure allows sugarcane roots to elongate up to eight times faster than in disturbed soil under compaction and moisture stress, and yields new models for predicting root growth.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beneath every sugarcane field lies an invisible negotiation between plant and soil. Roots must force their way through a matrix of solid particles, water films and air-filled cavities, and when that matrix becomes too hard or too dry, growth stalls. A new study published in Plant and Soil has quantified, with unusual precision, just how much a preserved soil structure can help roots overcome these obstacles. Working with soil from a long-term experiment in Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil, researchers found that sugarcane roots growing in a 31-year-old no-tillage system elongated up to 8.2 times faster under severe compaction and near-saturated moisture than roots growing in soil that had been disturbed and repacked. The finding offers some of the strongest experimental evidence yet that the architecture of the pore network itself, not merely the bulk density of the soil, governs how well crops cope with physical stress.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Luiz Henrique Quecine Grande and Moacir Tuzzin de Moraes of the University of São Paulo&#8217;s Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture, set out to fill a persistent gap in crop modelling. Semi-empirical models that link root elongation to soil penetration resistance and water status exist for soybean, wheat and maize, but no equivalent framework had been built for sugarcane. That omission matters because sugarcane is a semi-perennial crop: its root system is renewed after each harvest and must keep functioning across ratoon cycles lasting three to ten years, exposing it to soil physical constraints far longer than annual crops face. If soil structure shapes how roots respond to stress, then any model that ignores structure risks systematically misjudging how deep and fast sugarcane roots will grow, and therefore how much water they can extract during drought.</p>
<p>To isolate the effect of structure, the team designed an elegant three-way comparison. Soil cores with undisturbed structure were collected from a field trial established in 1993, which compares conventional tillage, last disturbed five years before sampling, with a no-tillage system that had gone 31 years without mechanical disturbance apart from furrow opening at planting. A third treatment consisted of repacked soil, sieved and compressed into cylinders at five bulk densities, deliberately destroying any continuous pore network. The soil itself was a clay-rich Rhodic Eutrudox, an Oxisol with roughly 70 percent clay, typical of Brazil&#8217;s premier sugarcane region. Sampling at 0 to 20 centimetres captured the topsoil where most early root activity occurs, and 100 undisturbed cores per tillage system ensured the natural field variability in compaction was represented rather than averaged away.</p>
<p>Each structural condition was then subjected to a matrix of five levels of mechanical stress and five levels of hydric stress. The researchers equilibrated the cores at matric potentials ranging from a wet −5 hPa to a dry −8000 hPa, producing degrees of water saturation between roughly 58 and 95 percent. Pre-sprouted sugarcane seedlings, 60 days old, had their existing root systems carefully removed so that only new, uniform first-order roots of 0.5 to 2 centimetres were transplanted into the cores. After about 95 hours in a growth chamber held at 27 degrees Celsius, the roots were extracted, washed and measured. The elongation rate, expressed in centimetres per day, became the response variable for every combination of structure, compaction and moisture, with a maximum observed rate of 3.62 centimetres per day under stress-free control conditions.</p>
<p>The results revealed a striking hierarchy of vulnerability. In the repacked soil, root elongation collapsed by up to 84 percent as compaction increased, falling from 3.04 to just 0.51 centimetres per day under near-saturated conditions. Conventional tillage soil showed intermediate losses, declining from 2.14 to 0.69 centimetres per day across the same compaction range. The 31-year no-tillage soil, by contrast, lost only about 30 percent of its elongation rate across the entire compactness range from 75 to 95 percent. Under the harshest combination tested, a penetration resistance of about 6.2 megapascals at 95 percent water saturation, roots in no-tillage soil grew 8.2 times faster than in repacked soil and 1.8 times faster than in soil under conventional tillage. Mechanical impedance, the team concluded, was the dominant stress, with water stress acting largely by amplifying it.</p>
<p>The mechanism behind this resilience lies in the pore network. As macropore volume, the fraction of pores larger than 50 micrometres, declined from 0.20 to 0.05 cubic metres per cubic metre, root elongation fell by only 38.5 percent in the no-tillage soil, but by 74.4 percent under conventional tillage and 83.1 percent in repacked soil. Remarkably, roots in no-tillage soil at a macropore volume of 0.05 grew as fast as roots in the other treatments at roughly 0.12, meaning the preserved structure effectively compensated for a loss of more than half the macroporosity. Saturated hydraulic conductivity told the same story: at equivalent macropore volumes, water moved through the structured soils up to 3.3 times faster than through the repacked samples, indicating that the remaining pores in undisturbed soil were better connected and more permeable.</p>
<p>From these data the researchers fitted a three-dimensional Gaussian model expressing root elongation rate as a joint function of penetration resistance and degree of water saturation, one model per structural condition. The models performed well, explaining 47 percent of elongation variability in conventional tillage, 71 percent in no-tillage and 78 percent in repacked soil, with determination coefficients above 0.87 and near-zero bias. The shape of the response surfaces carried the key message: the same nominal physical stress produced very different elongation rates depending on structure. The authors argue this means root elongation functions cannot simply be transferred between soils with contrasting structural histories, a caution that applies directly to the agro-hydrological models, such as Canegro and SWAP, which often assume constant root growth rates regardless of what the soil is doing.</p>
<p>To translate the laboratory measurements into architectural consequences, the team integrated their stress functions into RootBox, a three-dimensional functional-structural root model. Simulating 45 days of growth at a moderate water saturation of 81 percent, they found rooting depth reached 31 centimetres in the no-tillage scenario, 20 centimetres under conventional tillage and only 15 centimetres in repacked soil, roughly half the no-tillage depth. Under completely stress-free conditions, simulated roots reached about 65 centimetres, underscoring how much potential depth is forfeited to physical limitation. Deeper rooting is not an aesthetic detail: it determines access to subsoil water during dry spells, and previous field studies have linked no-tillage to greater sugarcane root biomass at depths of 80 to 100 centimetres.</p>
<p>The findings carry practical weight for one of the world&#8217;s largest sugar and bioenergy crops. Conventional tillage temporarily loosens compacted layers, but that loosening is short-lived and can leave subsurface plough pans while degrading load-bearing capacity under heavy harvester traffic. The new results suggest that abandoning disturbance, or simply leaving tilled soil undisturbed for five years as in the conventional treatment here, allows a continuous, biologically generated pore network to re-establish, giving roots low-resistance pathways through otherwise hostile ground. These biopores, left behind by decayed roots, also improve gas diffusion, which matters because waterlogged, compacted soil can suffocate the oxygen-hungry meristem at the root tip. The study notes that roots sense compaction partly through restricted ethylene diffusion, a hormonal signal trapped by dense soil, and that preserved pore continuity appears to blunt this stress perception.</p>
<p>The authors are careful about limits. Their models are calibrated for penetration resistances between 1 and 8 megapascals and water saturations between 50 and 95 percent, so drier conditions and full saturation remain outside their predictive range, and the RootBox simulations were illustrative rather than field-validated. The penetration resistance equation, fitted with the Busscher model, is best suited to soils with similar clay content. Even so, the central conclusion stands firmly: soil structure is not a passive backdrop to root growth but an active buffer against mechanical and hydric stress, and it deserves a place inside the soil–plant–atmosphere models that forecast crop water use. For an industry facing more erratic rainfall and heavier machinery, the message from this Brazilian Oxisol is that the cheapest root growth insurance may simply be to stop disturbing the ground.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> The effect of no-tillage soil structure on sugarcane root elongation under mechanical and hydric stresses in a Brazilian Oxisol</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> No-tillage soil structure increases sugarcane root elongation under mechanical and hydric stresses in an Oxisol</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Grande, L. H. Q., Macedo, M. D., dos Santos, J. K., da Silva, L. H. A., de Alencar, A. A., dos Santos Vianna, M., Bolonhezi, D., &amp; de Moraes, M. T. (2026). No-tillage soil structure increases sugarcane root elongation under mechanical and hydric stresses in an Oxisol. <em>Plant and Soil</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09113-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09113-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09113-2" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11104-026-09113-2</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> sugarcane, no-tillage, soil structure, root elongation, soil compaction, penetration resistance, biopores, macroporosity, Oxisol, soil physics, root growth modelling, hydric stress</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">220126</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hidden Soil Genes Reshape Carbon Cycling When Crop Stover Returns to Fields</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/hidden-soil-genes-reshape-carbon-cycling-when-crop-stover-returns-to-fields/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beta-glucosidase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biochar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biochar impacts on soil microbial genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon cycling in agricultural soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellulose degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservation agriculture in Northeast China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop stover residue management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of crop residues on soil carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene-level understanding of soil organic matter transformation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GH1 genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GH3 genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of tillage on soil microbial communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial functional diversity in soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial mechanisms of cellulose decomposition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular analysis of soil microbes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mollisol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[no-tillage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[priming effect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil carbon sequestration strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soil microbial genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil organic carbon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stover returning]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=196691</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A three-year field study in Northeast China's Mollisol shows that stover returning practices, including biochar and no-tillage mulching, reshape the functional diversity of beta-glucosidase genes that control soil carbon conversion, revealing unexpected priming effects and the outsized role of low-abundance genes.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beneath the black soils of Northeast China, an invisible workforce of microbes is quietly deciding the fate of one of the planet&#8217;s most important carbon reservoirs. A new three-year field experiment has revealed that the simple act of returning crop stover to the soil, whether as chopped residue, mulch, or biochar, dramatically reshapes the functional diversity of the genes that govern cellulose decomposition and carbon conversion. The findings, published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, offer a rare gene-level window into how farming decisions ripple through the microbial machinery that controls whether agricultural soils store carbon or release it back into the atmosphere.</p>
<p>The research focused on Mollisol, the deep, organic-rich soil that dominates Northeast China&#8217;s corn belt and ranks among the world&#8217;s most fertile, and most threatened, agricultural resources. Decades of intensive tillage have eroded these soils, and stover returning has been promoted as a cornerstone of conservation agriculture to rebuild organic matter. Yet the microbial mechanisms by which returned residues are actually converted into stable soil carbon have remained frustratingly obscure. Most studies measure bulk enzyme activity or total microbial communities, leaving open the question of which specific genes, carried by which specific organisms, perform the critical transformations.</p>
<p>To close that gap, a team led by researchers at the Institute of Applied Ecology of the Chinese Academy of Sciences set up a controlled field trial comparing four tillage regimes: conventional tillage with residue removed, stover biochar incorporated by rotary tillage, direct incorporation of chopped stover, and stover mulching under no-tillage management. Rather than simply measuring the overall activity of beta-glucosidase, the workhorse enzyme that cleaves cellobiose during cellulose breakdown, the team targeted the enzyme&#8217;s genetic underpinnings, specifically genes belonging to glycoside hydrolase families 1 and 3, abbreviated GH1 and GH3. These gene families encode beta-glucosidases with distinct ecological roles, and their abundance can shift far faster than measurable enzyme activity.</p>
<p>The results exposed a striking asymmetry. Conventional tillage pushed GH1 gene abundance up to 8,586 copies per gram of soil while depressing GH3 to 2,660 copies per gram, whereas the biochar treatment drove GH3 abundance to a remarkable 20,701 copies per gram, the highest level recorded in the study. Intriguingly, measured beta-glucosidase enzyme activity itself showed no significant difference across treatments. According to the authors, this divergence carries a important message: the genes encoding soil enzymes respond to environmental change much more rapidly than the enzyme activity they ultimately produce. Gene copy number, in other words, acts as an early-warning signal of functional change that traditional enzyme assays miss entirely.</p>
<p>The two gene families also behaved in strikingly divergent ways when correlated against enzyme activity, suggesting that GH1 and GH3 represent distinct functional strategies in soil carbon cycling rather than redundant copies of the same process. Under no-tillage stover mulching, the researchers identified a keystone species associated with GH1, the actinobacterium Micromonospora, designated OTU12, which appears to facilitate cellulose degradation. Its abundance rose in lockstep with soil organic carbon, measured at 17.43 grams per kilogram, and with microbial biomass nitrogen at 73.80 milligrams per kilogram, while it was suppressed by elevated nitrate nitrogen at 8.43 milligrams per kilogram. This pattern hints that Micromonospora thrives in carbon-rich, moderately nitrogen-limited conditions, a profile consistent with its known role as a cellulose degrader in terrestrial ecosystems.</p>
<p>Yet no-tillage delivered a paradox of its own. Despite fostering this beneficial cellulose-degrading keystone species, the treatment showed a sharp drop in GH1 gene abundance, falling to just 1,637 copies per gram. The researchers interpret this as a decoupling between gene copy number and functional potential, a cautionary finding for anyone who assumes that more gene copies automatically mean more biochemical capacity. A small number of highly active organisms, or low-abundance genes performing outsized functional roles, can dominate carbon transformation in ways that bulk gene quantification obscures. The study emphasizes that these low-abundance genes, often overlooked in sequencing surveys, may be among the most important players in the soil carbon economy.</p>
<p>The biochar treatment produced an even more unexpected twist. The GH3-associated keystone species under biochar incorporation was identified as Brevundimonas, designated OTU3093, which correlated positively with soil organic carbon at 18.80 grams per kilogram and with particulate organic carbon at 4.79 grams per kilogram, implicating it in carbon mineralization processes. Contrary to the conventional expectation that biochar stabilizes soil carbon by locking it away, the data suggest that biochar paradoxically stimulated beta-glucosidase activity through SOC decomposition mediated by OTU3093. This mechanism, the authors propose, could drive a priming effect, in which the addition of biochar accelerates the microbial breakdown of existing native soil organic matter rather than preserving it. For biochar proponents, the finding is a sobering reminder that adding carbon-rich amendments can sometimes stimulate the very decomposition processes they are meant to suppress.</p>
<p>The broader implications reach well beyond Northeast China. Soil contains more carbon than the atmosphere and all vegetation combined, and the trajectory of that carbon under global agriculture is one of the great uncertainties in climate projections. By demonstrating that stover-returning practices restructure the functional gene landscape of carbon conversion, the study provides a mechanistic bridge between farm management and the biogeochemistry that climate models depend on. It also validates functional gene diversity analysis as a sensitive and rapid diagnostic tool, capable of detecting shifts in microbial potential long before they become visible in enzyme assays or soil carbon inventories.</p>
<p>For farmers and policymakers, the practical lessons are nuanced. No-tillage with stover mulching appears to cultivate beneficial cellulose-degrading microbes and support soil organic carbon and microbial nitrogen, but it simultaneously suppresses total GH1 gene copy number, complicating simple interpretations. Biochar incorporation maximizes GH3 gene abundance yet may carry a hidden cost through priming-induced carbon loss. Conventional tillage, long criticized for degrading soil structure, demonstrably skews the gene balance toward one hydrolase family over another. The optimal strategy, the researchers suggest, may lie in tailoring stover-returning methods to local soil conditions and management goals, informed by monitoring of functional genes rather than bulk activity alone. As the study concludes, understanding the complex relationship between soil enzyme genes and activity, including the critical role of low-abundance genes, is essential for optimizing carbon turnover in agroecosystems and safeguarding the world&#8217;s remaining Mollisols.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> The effect of stover returning practices on the functional diversity of beta-glucosidase genes involved in soil carbon conversion in Northeast China Mollisol</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Stover returning practices alter the functional diversity of genes associated with carbon conversion in Mollisol of Northeast China</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Stover returning practices alter the functional diversity of genes associated with carbon conversion in Mollisol of Northeast China. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-026-02815-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-026-02815-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-026-02815-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s13068-026-02815-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> stover returning, soil organic carbon, beta-glucosidase, GH1 genes, GH3 genes, biochar, no-tillage, Mollisol, carbon cycling, soil microbiology, cellulose degradation, priming effect</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">196691</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
