<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>nitinol &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/nitinol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 05:06:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Machine Learning Cracks the Code of Nitinol Wear, a Metal That Remembers Its Shape</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/machine-learning-cracks-the-code-of-nitinol-wear-a-metal-that-remembers-its-shape/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Blake Davidson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 05:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI-driven wear law recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archard equation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental factors influencing Nitinol wear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[friction and wear analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gradient boosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heat treatment effects on Nitinol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine learning in tribology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical device durability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nickel-titanium alloy lifespan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitinol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nitinol shape memory alloy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nonlinear wear behavior modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SHAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shape-memory alloys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sliding contact wear in aerospace components]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triboinformatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triboinformatics applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tribology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wear prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wear prediction of superelastic metals]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=193814</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new triboinformatics study uses gradient boosting, deep learning, and interpretable AI to accurately predict wear and friction in Nitinol shape-memory alloys across different heat treatments, recovering a generalized wear law where the classical Archard equation fails.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nitinol, the remarkable nickel-titanium alloy that can remember its shape and flex thousands of times without deforming, has long been prized for everything from medical stents to aerospace couplings and dent-resistant bearings. Yet one stubborn question has haunted engineers who deploy this superelastic metal: how fast will it wear out under real sliding contact? Predicting wear in Nitinol has resisted the simple equations that work for ordinary steels, because the alloy&#8217;s response shifts dramatically with heat treatment, load, speed, and test duration. Now a new study published in the Journal of Materials Science shows that machine learning, applied with unusual rigor, can finally pin down those elusive wear and friction trends, and even recover a generalized wear law that the classical textbook equation could not.</p>
<p>The research, carried out by Samuel Onimpa Alfred of the Department of Aerospace Engineering at the University of Michigan, belongs to a rapidly growing field called triboinformatics, where artificial intelligence is used to decode the messy, nonlinear world of friction, lubrication, and wear. Tribology, the science of interacting surfaces in relative motion, is not a niche pursuit. Earlier studies cited in the work estimate that friction and wear-related losses consume a staggering share of global energy, contributing substantially to costs and emissions across industry. Making surfaces last longer, in artificial hip joints or in jet engine bearings, translates directly into energy saved and devices that survive longer inside the human body or inside an aircraft engine.</p>
<p>What makes Nitinol such a fascinating test case is its shape-memory and superelastic character. Deform it and it snaps back; heat it past a critical temperature and it returns to a previously memorized configuration. But these same properties make its tribological behavior notoriously complex. In this study, Alfred examined four distinct Nitinol conditions: an equiatomic titanium-nickel alloy, and three versions of a nickel-rich composition known as 60NiTi that had been aged, annealed, or solution-treated. Each heat treatment changes the alloy&#8217;s microstructure, hardness, and elasticity, and therefore changes how it wears when scraped against a counterface in dry, reciprocating sliding. Classical wear laws, which tend to assume wear scales simply with load and sliding distance while inversely scaling with hardness, capture these shifts poorly.</p>
<p>To tame that complexity, Alfred assembled a dataset of 336 individual measurements drawn from previously published, peer-reviewed reciprocating dry-sliding experiments, covering weight loss, cumulative wear over time, and steady-state coefficient of friction for all four material conditions. The modeling strategy then subjected a battery of algorithms to a demanding examination. Instead of splitting the data randomly, the study used grouped cross-validation, meaning that entire series of wear tests were withheld from the model during training. This is the scientific equivalent of asking a student to answer questions about chapters of a book they were never allowed to read, and it guards against the overly optimistic predictions that plague many machine-learning studies in materials science.</p>
<p>Even under this harsh test, gradient boosting, an ensemble method that builds a predictive model from many sequentially corrected decision trees, emerged as the clear winner. It predicted weight loss with an R-squared of 0.92 and the coefficient of friction with an R-squared of 0.91, beating support-vector regression, random forests, and simple linear baselines. When the cross-validation was made less restrictive and random splits were allowed, those scores climbed to 0.98 for wear and 0.94 for friction. The result confirms that gradient boosting does not just memorize data; it learns genuinely transferable relationships between operating conditions and tribological outcomes, even for material-test combinations it has never encountered.</p>
<p>Crucially, the study did not stop at prediction. Using SHapley Additive exPlanations, or SHAP, a technique borrowed from cooperative game theory that assigns each input variable its fair share of credit for a model&#8217;s output, Alfred opened the black box. The analysis revealed that applied load is the dominant driver of wear, while oscillation frequency dominates friction behavior, with higher frequencies associated with lower friction coefficients, a trend consistent with frictional heating at the sliding interface. This kind of transparency matters enormously for engineers, because a model that merely outputs numbers without explanations offers no guidance on which design levers to pull.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most striking achievement is a deep learning result: a gated recurrent unit network, a type of neural network designed for sequential data, reproduced the full time-resolved wear trajectories of completely unseen tests with an R-squared of 0.91. In other words, given the early portion of a wear test, the network could accurately trace how material loss would accumulate over the entire remaining test, test after test, across all four heat treatments. That capability opens the door to digital wear forecasting, where a short initial experiment or monitoring window could stand in for long and expensive laboratory campaigns.</p>
<p>The study then confronted the granddaddy of wear science, the Archard equation, formulated in 1953, which states that wear volume is proportional to load and sliding distance and inversely proportional to hardness. When that classical law was fitted to the Nitinol dataset, it managed an R-squared of only 0.27, and performed even worse, going negative, when hardness was imposed rather than fitted. Alfred instead let the data speak, recovering a generalized Archard-type law in which the exponents on load, sliding distance, frequency, and hardness are free parameters. The resulting equation, weight loss equals 0.0425 times load to the power 0.78, sliding distance to the power 0.54, frequency to the power minus 0.14, and hardness to the power minus 0.26, described all four heat treatments with an R-squared of 0.79, using only measured hardness rather than material identity labels.</p>
<p>The exponents themselves tell a physical story. The sub-linear load exponent of 0.78 suggests that superelastic Nitinol distributes contact stress in a way that softens the wear increase as loads climb, while the negative frequency exponent quantifies the frictional-heating effect seen in the SHAP analysis. Most intriguingly, the fitted wear coefficient for each material correlated almost perfectly, at r equals 0.97, with the ratio of elastic modulus to hardness, a dimensionless quantity long championed in surface engineering as an indicator of elastic, wear-tolerant contact. When the modulus-to-hardness ratio served as the sole material descriptor in the generalized law, the fit reached an R-squared of 0.83, essentially matching models that knew which alloy they were dealing with.</p>
<p>For a metal that must survive inside arteries, bearings, and aerospace mechanisms without the benefit of lubrication, these findings provide something genuinely new: accurate, transparent, and physically consistent models that connect processing, properties, and performance. A designer can now estimate how a given heat treatment, hardness, and duty cycle will translate into wear and friction, before a single prototype is machined. More broadly, the work is a template for how triboinformatics should be done, with strict grouped validation, interpretable explanations, and laws recovered from data that honor the physics of contact rather than discarding it. As Nitinol finds its way into ever more demanding applications, the machines that predict its wear are, fittingly, learning from the metal that never forgets.</p>
<p>Beneath the headline results lies a dataset with an unusually clean provenance. The 336 measurements were not generated afresh for the modeling study but were compiled from two previously published, peer-reviewed experimental campaigns on superelastic TiNi and 60NiTi, with every table—loads, frequencies, durations, sliding distances, specimen masses before and after testing, cumulative weight loss, and steady-state friction coefficients—reproduced in the new paper&#8217;s appendix. That decision to expose the full experimental record alongside the models is itself a small contribution to a field where data scarcity and fragmentation remain the chief obstacles to progress.</p>
<p>The geometry underlying those tables also rewards a closer look. Each test used a 5.03 millimeter reciprocating stroke, so every cycle covered just over a centimeter of sliding, and the sliding distances reported for all four material conditions satisfy an exact arithmetic relation linking distance to frequency and test duration. All fifty-six wear-time series were strictly monotonic, with no missing entries, meaning the recurrent network tasked with reconstructing wear trajectories never had to impute gaps—an often unappreciated advantage when deep learning meets sparse laboratory data.</p>
<p>The strong correlation between the fitted wear coefficient and the elastic-modulus-to-hardness ratio also has a pedigree worth noting. Surface engineers have argued for decades that this ratio, rather than hardness alone, governs how well a material tolerates elastic contact and resists abrasion, particularly for coatings and for alloys whose elastic resilience absorbs deformation that would otherwise be permanent. The Nitinol results give that long-standing heuristic a quantitative, data-driven endorsement for shape-memory metals specifically.</p>
<p>The study situates itself in a broader movement. Recent systematic reviews of machine learning in tribology have catalogued a wave of applications, from aluminum-matrix composites to modified zinc alloys to diamond-like carbon coatings, where algorithms predict friction and wear from operating parameters. What distinguishes the present work within that wave is its insistence on withholding whole test series during validation and on recovering an interpretable wear law from the same data used to train opaque models. The author notes that the code underlying the analysis is available on reasonable request, and the supplementary data file, roughly 800 kilobytes in spreadsheet form, invites others to replicate or extend the models for their own shape-memory alloy systems.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Machine learning prediction of wear and friction behavior in heat-treated Nitinol shape-memory alloys.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Triboinformatic modeling of nitinol alloys under different heat-treatment regimes</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Alfred, S. O. (2026). Triboinformatic modeling of nitinol alloys under different heat-treatment regimes. <em>Journal of Materials Science</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-026-13713-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-026-13713-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-026-13713-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10853-026-13713-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Nitinol, tribology, machine learning, wear prediction, shape-memory alloys, gradient boosting, SHAP, Archard equation, deep learning, heat treatment, friction, triboinformatics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">193814</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>New stent retriever advances reshape the future of acute stroke thrombectomy</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/new-stent-retriever-advances-reshape-the-future-of-acute-stroke-thrombectomy/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cassandra Pierce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 05:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acute ischemic stroke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acute ischemic stroke treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balloon guide catheter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Challenges in clot retrieval procedures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clot removal device innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dense clot and tortuous vessel treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distal embolization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Endovascular stroke therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[endovascular treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering and clinical integration in stroke devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first-pass reperfusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future of clot-removal technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large vessel occlusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Large vessel occlusion management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanical thrombectomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mechanical thrombectomy advancements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medium vessel occlusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitinol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personalized stroke treatment strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reperfusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stent retriever]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stent retriever technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stroke intervention clinical trials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thrombus composition]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=193806</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A comprehensive review in the Journal of Neurology traces how stent retrievers became the standard of care for acute ischemic stroke and maps the engineering and clinical advances that could make clot removal faster, safer, and more personalized.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A sweeping review published in the Journal of Neurology charts how a small mesh-like device known as the stent retriever has transformed the treatment of acute ischemic stroke, and where the next decade of clot-removal technology is heading. Large vessel occlusions, in which a major artery supplying the brain is suddenly blocked, remain among the leading causes of death and long-term disability worldwide. Mechanical thrombectomy using stent retrievers is now firmly established as the standard of care for these patients, yet a substantial number of procedures still fail to restore full blood flow, particularly when the clot is dense, the vessel anatomy is tortuous, or the occlusion sits in a hard-to-reach territory. The review, led by Zhiyuan Xie and colleagues at the Clinical Medical College of Jiujiang University in China, synthesizes the technological progress, clinical trial evidence, and unresolved challenges surrounding these devices, arguing that the integration of engineering innovation with clinical data is the surest path toward safer, more individualized stroke treatment.</p>
<p>The technology&#8217;s lineage traces back to the first-generation Merci retriever, a corkscrew-like device approved in the mid-2000s that proved mechanical clot removal in the brain was feasible but achieved only modest recanalization rates. The decisive turning point came with self-expanding stent retrievers, notably Solitaire and Trevo, which are compressed inside a microcatheter, navigated through the vasculature to the clot, and then unsheathed so the nitinol mesh expands and integrates with the thrombus. Unlike a static stent left in place, these retrievers engage the clot mechanically across its full length, allowing the operator to pull the entire construct into a guide catheter. Randomized trials published in 2015, including MR CLEAN, ESCAPE, EXTEND-IA, SWIFT PRIME, and REVASCAT, together demonstrated overwhelming benefit of endovascular thrombectomy over medical therapy alone, reshaping international guidelines almost overnight and establishing first-generation stent retrievers as the anchor of modern stroke intervention.</p>
<p>The technical principle behind the second-generation devices is deceptively simple: radial force from the expanding mesh compresses the clot against the vessel wall while individual struts penetrate the thrombus, creating a mechanical interlock. In practice, the interaction is governed by a complex interplay of clot composition, device geometry, and vessel size. Ischemic stroke thrombi vary enormously, from soft, red-cell-rich emboli shed from the heart to hard, fibrin-rich clots loaded with platelets and von Willebrand factor that resist mechanical integration. Histological analyses cited in the review show that fibrin-dense outer shells and platelet-rich regions correlate with failed retrieval and poorer revascularization outcomes. This biological heterogeneity has pushed engineers toward devices with segmented designs, larger mesh cells, and specialized capture zones. Multi-zone platforms such as NeVa incorporate discrete drop zones with tightly spaced struts designed to trap organized clots, while radially adjustable retrievers such as Tigertriever allow the operator to expand the device progressively until it matches the vessel diameter, an advantage in both oversized proximal vessels and narrow distal branches.</p>
<p>Device development has also converged on integrated retrieval-and-protection concepts. EmboTrap-class retrievers feature distal capture baskets intended to intercept fragments that would otherwise migrate downstream and cause new infarcts, a complication known as distal embolization. registries such as ARISE II and the global EXCELLENT registry for the EMBOTRAP device have reported high first-pass reperfusion rates with these hybrid designs. First-pass effect, meaning complete reperfusion achieved in a single retrieval attempt, has emerged as a key performance metric because each additional pass increases procedural time, trauma to the endothelium, and the risk of hemorrhagic transformation. Recent generation devices such as Solitaire X have demonstrated significantly improved first-pass success compared with their predecessors, and tip-design studies confirm that the shape and stiffness of the retriever&#8217;s distal end materially influence whether fragments escape during withdrawal.</p>
<p>In parallel with hardware evolution, procedural technique has advanced into highly choreographed combinations. The most influential refinement is the pairing of stent retrievers with large-bore aspiration catheters positioned at the face of the clot, a strategy variously branded as Solumbra, SAVE, or ARTS. Aspiration continuously extracts clot fragments dislodged by the retriever, reducing the shower of emboli that would otherwise travel into healthy territory. Balloon guide catheters add a second layer of protection by temporarily arresting antegrade flow in the parent artery, creating a stagnant zone from which debris can be vacuumed rather than washed distally. The randomized PROTECT-MT trial from China showed that balloon guide catheters significantly improve excellent reperfusion rates, validating what in-vitro flow studies had long predicted. For refractory occlusions, operators increasingly deploy double stent retrievers simultaneously, doubling the mechanical interface with the clot, and recent bench studies plus the randomized TWIN2WIN trial support this bail-out strategy, although cumulative vessel wall injury remains a documented concern in animal models.</p>
<p>The clinical indications for thrombectomy have expanded dramatically alongside the devices themselves. Landmark trials including DAWN and DEFUSE 3 extended the treatment window from six hours to twenty-four hours in patients selected by advanced perfusion imaging, demonstrating that brain tissue can remain salvageable long after symptom onset when collateral circulation is robust. More recently, attention has turned to posterior circulation strokes caused by basilar artery occlusion, which are uniformly devastating without treatment; trials such as ATTENTION and BAOCHE provided the first randomized evidence supporting endovascular therapy in this territory. Equally consequential are the new studies in large infarct cores, including SELECT2, ANGEL-ASPECT, and RESCUE-Japan LIMIT, which overturned the long-held exclusion of patients with extensive established damage and showed net functional benefit from thrombectomy even in these high-risk presentations.</p>
<p>The most recent frontier involves medium and distal vessel occlusions, blocks in arteries one to three millimeters in diameter that were historically managed with medication because standard devices were too bulky. Purpose-built low-profile retrievers, including 3-millimeter variants of Solitaire X and Trevo and the adjustable Tigertriever 13, have enabled operators to reach these small vessels, and a wave of randomized trials in 2025 and 2026, including DISTALS, DISTAL, and DISCOUNT, has begun to establish benefit under imaging-guided selection. The review emphasizes that territory-specific engineering, from smaller delivery profiles to softer, more flexible distal architectures, is now the dominant axis of device innovation, with hybrid devices such as Aperio and specialized platforms for cerebral venous sinus thrombosis broadening the field further.</p>
<p>Materials science is contributing a quieter but potentially transformative layer of progress. Nitinol remains the workhorse alloy because its superelasticity allows dense crimping and atraumatic self-expansion, but its poor radiographic visibility complicates positioning, prompting coatings and design changes that enhance fluoroscopic contrast. Surface engineering aims to reduce thrombogenicity and endothelial damage, with heparin-based hydrogel coatings, endothelium-mimicking bioactive layers, and nanostructured oxide films under investigation. More provocative are clot-adhesive coatings that deliberately bind to fibrin, effectively welding the retriever to resistant thrombi, and micro-patterned surfaces that increase contact area. In a striking departure from conventional designs, milli-spinner thrombectomy, reported in Nature in 2025, uses a rotating, tangle-forming structure to compress and extract clots regardless of composition, hinting that the retrieval paradigm itself may not be permanent.</p>
<p>Looking forward, the review identifies thrombus characterization as the bridge between biology and device choice. Radiomic analysis of clot appearance on imaging, combined with biomarkers of clot composition, could soon allow operators to predict before the first pass whether a given occlusion will yield to a standard retriever or demand an adjustable device, dual-stent technique, or direct aspiration. Personalized device selection of this kind would attack the core unresolved problems: fibrin-rich resistant thrombi, embolic complications, vascular injury from repeated passes, and the limited high-level evidence supporting many of the newest devices, which have largely been validated in registries rather than randomized trials. The authors argue that ongoing integration of engineering innovation with rigorous clinical data will support increasingly individualized and safer thrombectomy strategies, and with stroke remaining a leading cause of disability globally, even incremental gains in first-pass success translate into meaningful reductions in death and dependence. The stent retriever, born from a simple wire mesh, continues to evolve into a precision instrument tailored to the specific clot, vessel, and patient standing between a stroke and recovery.</p>
<p>The stakes of these technical refinements are best understood against the sheer scale of the disease. Global burden analyses cited in the review estimate that stroke affected well over a hundred million people worldwide in recent years, and large vessel occlusions contribute disproportionately to death and dependence because the entire territory of a major cerebral artery is threatened within minutes of onset. Intravenous thrombolysis, the other pillar of acute reperfusion therapy, dissolves clot biochemically but achieves recanalization in only a minority of large vessel occlusions and carries a risk of arterial reocclusion, which is why mechanical retrieval became indispensable.</p>
<p>The review also situates current practice within the 2026 American Heart Association and American Stroke Association guideline for early management of acute ischemic stroke, reflecting how trial evidence is rapidly codified into standards of care. Beyond the procedure itself, the authors note that reperfusion initiates a second wave of injury, including blood-brain barrier breakdown and neuroinflammation, meaning that restoring flow is necessary but not always sufficient for good functional recovery. This biological reality underscores why procedural metrics such as first-pass success and reduced embolization matter clinically, and why the field increasingly views mechanical thrombectomy not as an isolated engineering problem but as one component of a broader effort spanning imaging selection, device design, and post-reperfusion neuroprotection.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Technological advances and clinical applications of stent retrievers in endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke.</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Stent retrievers for acute ischemic stroke: technological advances, clinical applications, and future perspectives</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Xie, Z., Wang, Z., Fu, P., Shi, Z., Zhuang, Z., Wang, H., Xiang, Y., Yin, X., &amp; Chen, Z. (2026). Stent retrievers for acute ischemic stroke: technological advances, clinical applications, and future perspectives. <em>Journal of Neurology, 273</em>(10), Article 590. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-026-14126-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-026-14126-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-026-14126-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00415-026-14126-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> acute ischemic stroke, stent retriever, mechanical thrombectomy, large vessel occlusion, endovascular treatment, first-pass reperfusion, nitinol, distal embolization, balloon guide catheter, medium vessel occlusion, thrombus composition, reperfusion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">193806</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
