<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ningxia &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/ningxia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:44:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Fertilizer Nitrogen Emerges as the Strongest Driver of Toxic Metal Buildup in Yellow River Farmland</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/fertilizer-nitrogen-emerges-as-the-strongest-driver-of-toxic-metal-buildup-in-yellow-river-farmland/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agricultural practices affecting soil chemistry in China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cadmium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental risks of nitrogen fertilizer use in irrigated farmland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertilizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fertilizer nitrogen and toxic metal accumulation in farmland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hazard mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heavy metal buildup in Yellow River Basin soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impact of nitrogen fertilizers on soil metal levels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Influence of fertilization on soil heavy metal contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irrigated agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ningxia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OPGD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PMF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Relationship between nitrogen levels and soil toxic elements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Role of intensive fertilization in soil pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soil contamination from agricultural practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soil sampling and analysis of toxic metals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source apportionment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spatial heterogeneity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Study on soil hazardous metals in Northwestern China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yellow River Basin]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=279822</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A study of 487 soil samples from China's Yellow River Basin finds that total nitrogen from fertilization is the strongest driver of toxic metal accumulation in irrigated farmland.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deep beneath the irrigated fields of northwestern China, an invisible ledger of toxic metals is being written one harvest at a time. A new study of nearly 500 soil samples from the Yellow River Basin has revealed that the single strongest predictor of where potentially hazardous elements accumulate is not industry, not traffic, and not geology — it is the nitrogen content of the soil itself, a direct fingerprint of decades of intensive fertilization. The finding, published in Frontiers in Soil Science, offers one of the most detailed portraits yet of how agricultural practice quietly reshapes the chemistry of farmland in one of the world&#8217;s most important food-producing regions.</p>
<p>The research team, led by scientists from the Ningxia Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences and collaborating institutions in China and Egypt, collected 487 topsoil samples from a 4,670-square-kilometer irrigation district spanning the cities of Yinchuan, Shizuishan, Wuzhong, and Zhongwei. Using a stratified random design that balanced farmland sites with adjacent forest and grassland plots, they measured concentrations of seven potentially hazardous elements: arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, nickel, lead, and zinc. Every sample was digested under strict EPA protocols and analyzed with graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry and inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry, with certified reference materials confirming recoveries between 96 and 105 percent.</p>
<p>The results paint a picture of contamination that is anything but uniform. Cadmium, the most spatially erratic of the seven metals, showed a coefficient of variation of roughly 56 percent, while arsenic and lead varied by more than a third across the landscape. Mean cadmium concentrations reached 0.32 milligrams per kilogram — more than three times the regional background of 0.097 — and just above the national screening threshold of 0.30 milligrams per kilogram set by China&#8217;s GB 15618-2018 standard. Lead, zinc, chromium, copper, and nickel all exceeded their respective background values as well, though most remained comfortably below regulatory limits, suggesting the contamination is real but not yet at crisis levels.</p>
<p>To untangle what was driving this patchwork of pollution, the researchers deployed two complementary computational tools. The first, an Optimal Parameters-based Geographical Detector (OPGD), quantifies how much of the spatial variation in metal concentrations can be explained by each of eleven environmental variables — from soil pH and texture to elevation, vegetation cover, and population density. The second, Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF), is a receptor model that mathematically deconstructs the measured concentrations into distinct source signatures, assigning each metal a proportional origin.</p>
<p>The OPGD results delivered the study&#8217;s most striking revelation. Total nitrogen, a proxy for long-term fertilizer and manure inputs, explained 79.6 percent of the spatial variability in the metal dataset — the highest Q-statistic of any factor tested. For chromium alone, nitrogen accounted for a Q-value of 0.796, while copper and zinc followed closely at 0.612 and 0.627 respectively. Soil texture, particularly the relative proportions of sand, silt, and clay, emerged as the second most important control, reflecting how fine particles adsorb and retain metal ions. Organic matter, elevation, and population density played secondary roles, and vegetation cover contributed surprisingly little.</p>
<p>But the story grew more intricate when the researchers examined factor interactions. Clay content alone explained only 13 percent of arsenic&#8217;s spatial pattern, yet when combined with soil organic matter, the joint explanatory power leapt to 81 percent — a nonlinear enhancement that suggests arsenic is held in place by a coupled mechanism of organic complexation and adsorption onto fine particles. Similarly, the interaction between elevation and organic matter explained 89 percent of chromium&#8217;s variability, pointing to terrain-driven redistribution working in tandem with organic retention. These synergies reveal that no single environmental lever controls metal fate; instead, soil chemistry operates as an interlocking system.</p>
<p>The PMF analysis then answered the question of where the metals actually come from. Five distinct source profiles emerged, together explaining more than 90 percent of the total variance. Cadmium was overwhelmingly tied to agricultural inputs — phosphate fertilizers and pesticides — accounting for 77 percent of its factor profile. Zinc and copper clustered around industrial emissions, with loadings of 56 and 38 percent respectively, concentrated near manufacturing hubs in Shizuishan and Wuzhong. Chromium and nickel traced back to geogenic parent material, reflecting the natural lithology of the Yellow River alluvial plain. Lead, with a striking 89 percent loading on a single factor, pointed squarely at traffic residues — a legacy of historical leaded gasoline alongside modern brake and tire wear. Arsenic, at 79 percent of a mixed anthropogenic factor, suggested combined inputs from irrigation water and diffuse industrial discharge.</p>
<p>When the team overlaid these source maps with the OPGD-derived risk layers, a composite hazard index revealed four contamination zones across the irrigation district. Low-risk areas, dominated by forest and grassland, sat far from human influence. Moderate-risk transitional zones gave way to high-risk farmland where cadmium and lead levels were elevated, and very-high-risk clusters appeared near industrial and urban centers where fertilizer use, traffic emissions, and industrial discharge converged. Cross-correlation between the independently derived PMF factor scores and OPGD risk layers yielded coefficients between 0.62 and 0.81, providing strong statistical validation that the two models were capturing the same underlying reality.</p>
<p>The spatial pattern of risk was anything but random. Hotspots concentrated in the central and lower western reaches of the irrigation district, with a prominent secondary cluster in the southeast. Arsenic and lead risks were largely confined to the central-western section, while nickel — the most broadly distributed contaminant — formed three distinct clusters spanning the central-western, central-eastern, and southeastern regions. Cadmium, chromium, and zinc hotspots clustered in the upstream portion of the irrigation system, where water enters the network first and presumably carries the highest dissolved loads.</p>
<p>What makes this study particularly consequential is what it implies about the future of food security in irrigated agroecosystems worldwide. The Yellow River Basin irrigates roughly 15 percent of China&#8217;s farmland and supports nearly 12 percent of its population, and the researchers note that comparable systems — the Indo-Gangetic Plain, the Nile Delta, the Murray–Darling Basin — face similar pressures from fertilizer dependence and industrial emissions. The finding that total nitrogen, a manageable agronomic variable, exerts the strongest statistical control over metal distribution suggests that precision fertilization, reduced over-application, and the adoption of low-cadmium phosphate sources could meaningfully slow contamination before it reaches irreversible thresholds. The authors caution that their hazard maps reflect contamination intensity rather than bioavailability or ecological toxicity, and they recommend future work incorporating DTPA-extractable metal fractions, soil enzyme assays, and human health risk models to translate spatial patterns into actionable exposure estimates. For now, the message is clear: the nitrogen farmers apply to boost yields is also writing a chemical record in the soil, and reading that record may be the key to keeping the Yellow River&#8217;s breadbasket productive for generations to come.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Spatial drivers and source apportionment of potentially hazardous elements in irrigated Yellow River Basin soils</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Spatial heterogeneity, source contributions, and hazard mapping of potentially hazardous elements in irrigated soils of the Yellow River Basin, Northwest China</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Xu, H., Liu, X., Chen, S., Luo, L., Wenfan, W., Ma, L., AbdelRahman, M. A. E., &amp; Sabra, D. M. (2026). Spatial heterogeneity, source contributions, and hazard mapping of potentially hazardous elements in irrigated soils of the Yellow River Basin, Northwest China. <em>Frontiers in Soil Science, 6</em>, Article 1966899. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2026.1966899" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2026.1966899</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoil.2026.1966899" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.3389/fsoil.2026.1966899</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> heavy metals, soil contamination, Yellow River Basin, cadmium, fertilizer, PMF, OPGD, spatial heterogeneity, irrigated agriculture, source apportionment, hazard mapping, Ningxia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">279822</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cloud Model Brings Precision to the Fight Against Rock Art Decay in China</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/cloud-model-brings-precision-to-the-fight-against-rock-art-decay-in-china/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Courtney Benton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2026 20:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Anthropology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced monitoring of rock face deterioration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China archaeological site preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate effects on ancient rock art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cloud model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cultural heritage science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Damaidi petroglyphs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital modeling of rock art decay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental impact on rock carvings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fracture analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[game theory weighting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heritage science and disaster mitigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heritage site deterioration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative conservation techniques for petroglyphs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ningxia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pearson correlation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petroglyphs preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quantitative assessment of rock art decay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rebound strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[risk grading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rock art conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spalling disease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spalling in stone heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stone deterioration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=259890</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers at Lanzhou University of Technology used a hybrid cloud model and game theory weighting framework to quantify spalling disease across 144 instances at the Damaidi petroglyphs, identifying rebound strength, particle density, nearest fracture distance, and fracture aperture as the key drivers of stone decay.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Deep in the arid hills of Ningxia, along the banks of the Yellow River, thousands of petroglyphs carved into dark rock faces record the lives of ancient peoples who lived millennia ago. The Damaidi Rock Art Conservation Area holds one of the richest concentrations of rock engravings in China, a vast open-air archive of hunting scenes, symbolic figures, and daily activities etched into stone. Yet like all exposed heritage, these carvings are under relentless assault from the environment. Among the most destructive threats is spalling, a disease of stone in which the rock surface flakes and peels away in layers, taking irreplaceable imagery with it. A new study published in npj Heritage Science offers one of the most systematic quantitative assessments of this deterioration ever attempted at the site, and its approach may reshape how conservators diagnose and treat rock art decay worldwide.</p>
<p>The research, led by Guopeng Wu, Ruiying Zhang, Zhijie Zhao, Guanghao Yu, Zhuohang Tian, Jiacheng Sui, and Kai Cui of the Silk Road Cultural Heritage Protection Research Institute and the Western Center of Disaster Mitigation in Civil Engineering at Lanzhou University of Technology, tackles a problem that has long frustrated heritage scientists. Spalling is not a uniform phenomenon. It manifests differently across a rock face depending on the local mineralogy, the density of microcracks, the strength of the surface, and the interplay of moisture, temperature swings, and salt weathering. Traditional condition surveys tend to rely on qualitative visual grading, which is inherently subjective and difficult to repeat or compare over time. The Damaidi team set out to replace that subjectivity with a reproducible numerical framework grounded in field measurement and laboratory testing.</p>
<p>The scale of the fieldwork alone is striking. The researchers conducted detailed surveys and laboratory analyses covering 144 individual instances of spalling distributed across eight densely carved zones of the conservation area. For each instance, they recorded a battery of physical and mechanical properties of the stone substrate, ultimately distilling the data into twelve indicators, labeled C1 through C12, that together characterize the vulnerability of the rock surface. These indicators span the mechanical integrity of the stone, its microstructural condition, and the geometry of the fracture networks that thread through it. By standardizing the description of each spalling instance through this common set of twelve variables, the team created a shared diagnostic language that can be applied consistently across the entire site and, in principle, at other rock art locations facing similar threats.</p>
<p>The analytical heart of the study is a hybrid method that combines cloud modeling with a game theory-based weighting scheme. Cloud modeling, a technique developed within the field of uncertainty artificial intelligence, is designed to handle the fuzzy boundary between qualitative descriptions and quantitative data. Rather than forcing each spalling instance into a rigid category, the cloud model represents concepts as clouds of numerical values defined by three parameters: expectation, entropy, and hyper-entropy. Expectation captures the central tendency of a grade, entropy describes its spread or fuzziness, and hyper-entropy quantifies the randomness of that spread. When a measured rock surface is evaluated, the model computes a membership degree describing how strongly it belongs to each severity grade, allowing borderline cases to be represented honestly rather than artificially forced into a single box.</p>
<p>The second ingredient, game theory-based weighting, addresses an equally stubborn problem in multi-indicator assessment: how much should each of the twelve indicators count toward the final severity score? Objective weighting methods derive weights from the statistical structure of the data itself, while subjective methods encode expert judgment about which factors matter most physically. Each approach has blind spots. The researchers treated the two families of weights as players in a cooperative game and solved for a combined weighting vector that minimizes the divergence between the combined result and each individual weighting scheme. The result is a set of composite weights that neither ignores the mathematics of the data nor the domain knowledge of conservators, producing a more defensible synthesis than either method alone could deliver.</p>
<p>With the hybrid model in place, the team classified spalling severity at Damaidi into four risk grades, each tied to a corresponding conservation strategy. This grading transforms the assessment from a static description into an actionable management tool. Zones and individual spalling instances falling into the highest risk grades can be prioritized for urgent intervention, such as consolidation or protective sheltering, while lower grades can be scheduled for routine monitoring. The researchers validated the framework, confirming both its accuracy and its rationality, which is a critical step for any quantitative method intended to inform real-world conservation budgets and interventions. Validation matters because a model that cannot be trusted to reproduce known conditions cannot be safely used to direct scarce preservation resources.</p>
<p>One of the most revealing components of the study is its correlation analysis. Using Pearson correlation, the team examined how strongly each of the twelve indicators related to the assessed severity of spalling. Four factors emerged as the most strongly correlated: rebound strength, designated C1, which reflects the hardness and integrity of the rock surface as measured by rebound testing; particle density, C6, which characterizes the compactness of the mineral grains forming the substrate; nearest fracture distance, C8, which measures how close the nearest crack lies to a given point on the surface; and fracture aperture, C10, which quantifies how wide those cracks are open. Together, these four indicators sketch a coherent physical picture of spalling as a process governed by surface mechanical weakness and the proximity of discontinuities through which moisture and stress can act.</p>
<p>That physical interpretation carries direct practical consequences. Rebound strength and particle density describe the intrinsic quality of the stone: a weak, loosely packed surface has little resistance to the cyclic stresses of daily heating and cooling, freeze-thaw action, and salt crystallization that drive flaking. Nearest fracture distance and fracture aperture, meanwhile, describe the pathways of attack: cracks act as conduits for water infiltration and as stress concentrators where failure initiates. A surface that is both mechanically weak and threaded with wide, closely spaced fractures is therefore the most likely candidate for severe spalling. For conservators, this suggests that monitoring programs should prioritize mapping fracture networks and tracking surface hardness over time, and that consolidation treatments aimed at strengthening the near-surface matrix and sealing microfractures may offer the greatest protective return.</p>
<p>Beyond its findings at a single site, the study&#8217;s authors frame the work as a preliminary scientific basis for the conservation of Damaidi and, importantly, as a potentially transferable model for analogous heritage sites. Rock art survives on every inhabited continent, from the painted caves of Europe to the engravings of the Australian outback and the deserts of the Americas, and spalling-type deterioration is a near-universal enemy of carved stone exposed to the elements. A framework built from twelve measurable indicators, processed through an uncertainty-aware model with transparent weighting, does not depend on the specific geology of Ningxia. Other research teams can adapt the indicator set to their local stone types, recalibrate the grade boundaries, and apply the same cloud-based evaluation pipeline, creating the possibility of genuinely comparable condition data across sites and continents.</p>
<p>The work also signals a broader shift in cultural heritage science, a field historically dominated by art historical judgment and artisanal intervention, toward the quantitative, data-driven methodologies familiar in engineering and the environmental sciences. The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation, the National Natural Science Foundation of Gansu, and programs at Lanzhou University of Technology, reflecting sustained institutional investment in heritage protection along the Silk Road corridor. For the petroglyphs of Damaidi, whose engraved panels have endured for thousands of years, the immediate benefit is a rigorous, repeatable diagnosis of where the stone is failing and why. For the discipline at large, the message is that the tools needed to save humanity&#8217;s oldest art may lie not only in the conservator&#8217;s kit but in the mathematics of uncertainty, provided researchers are willing to walk the rock faces and measure, instance by instance, exactly how the stone is letting go.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Quantitative assessment of spalling deterioration in Damaidi petroglyphs using cloud modeling and game theory-based weighting</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> A comprehensive evaluation of spalling disease in Damaidi petroglyphs using cloud modeling</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Wu, G., Zhang, R., zhao, Z., Yu, G., Tian, Z., Sui, J., &amp; Cui, K. (2026). A comprehensive evaluation of spalling disease in Damaidi petroglyphs using cloud modeling. <em>npj Heritage Science</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-026-02972-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-026-02972-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-026-02972-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s40494-026-02972-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Damaidi petroglyphs, rock art conservation, spalling disease, cloud model, game theory weighting, stone deterioration, cultural heritage science, fracture analysis, rebound strength, Pearson correlation, Ningxia, risk grading</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">259890</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slow-Release Fertilizer Unlocks Bigger Maize Yields on China&#8217;s Salt-Damaged Farmland</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/slow-release-fertilizer-unlocks-bigger-maize-yields-on-chinas-salt-damaged-farmland/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 01:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controlled-release fertilizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controlled-release fertilizer benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crop yield optimization in saline conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dry matter translocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertilizer application in Ningxia China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grain filling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[irrigation water productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maize yield improvement in saline-alkali soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ningxia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen leaching reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen use efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen use efficiency in salt-affected farmland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photosynthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polymer-coated fertilizer technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saline-alkali soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salt-affected soil crop productivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salt-damaged farmland management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Slow-release fertilizer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil salinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[source-sink relationship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture in arid regions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water productivity in saline soils]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=220742</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A two-year field trial in Ningxia shows that replacing half of conventional urea with polymer-coated controlled-release fertilizer raises maize yields by 18 percent on saline-alkali soil while dramatically improving nitrogen and irrigation water use efficiency.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the salt-crusted farmland of Ningxia in northwest China, where soil pH climbs above 8.7 and evaporation relentlessly concentrates salts in the root zone, maize growers have long faced a frustrating paradox: the nitrogen fertilizer they pour onto their fields largely refuses to stay there. Conventional urea releases its nitrogen in a sudden early burst, much of which volatilizes as ammonia or leaches away before the crop can use it, leaving plants starved during the grain-filling weeks when nitrogen demand peaks. A two-year field experiment conducted in the Yellow River Irrigation District now offers a strikingly simple remedy. By replacing half of the standard urea dose with polymer-coated controlled-release fertilizer, researchers boosted grain yield by just over 18 percent while lifting nitrogen recovery efficiency by more than 68 percent and irrigation water productivity by 18 percent, all on moderately saline-alkali soil that would normally suppress productivity.</p>
<p>The study, published in the Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, was carried out in Pingluo County, Ningxia, a warm temperate arid zone receiving a mere 177 millimeters of rain per year. Roughly 30 percent of the cultivated land in this region is moderately saline-alkali, part of the roughly 99 million hectares of such soil across China, of which more than 40 percent lies in the arid and semi-arid northwest. With per capita arable land in China below 40 percent of the global average, and maize covering about 43 million hectares and supplying more than 40 percent of total grain production, the stakes of squeezing more grain from degraded soils could hardly be higher. The research team, led by Yueqi Li and Jili Liu, set out to test whether matching nitrogen release to crop demand could rewire the entire physiology of the plant, not merely feed it more efficiently.</p>
<p>The experimental design was elegantly straightforward. Six treatments were compared in a randomized block layout with three replicates each: a no-nitrogen control, a conventional urea-only treatment, and four treatments in which 25, 50, 75, or 100 percent of the nitrogen was supplied as polyurethane-coated urea with a 60-day release period. Every treatment received identical total nutrients, 300 kilograms of nitrogen, 180 kilograms of phosphorus pentoxide, and 90 kilograms of potassium oxide per hectare, so any difference in performance could be attributed purely to the timing and pattern of nitrogen delivery. The maize cultivar Xianyu 1225 was sown at a high density of 90,000 plants per hectare, and all plots received the same 2,700 cubic meters of irrigation water, applied in equal installments at the six-leaf, twelve-leaf, and grain-filling stages.</p>
<p>The 50 percent substitution treatment, labeled T50, emerged as the clear winner across nearly every metric the team measured. Compared with conventional urea alone, it raised the leaf chlorophyll index by 11.65 percent and the net photosynthetic rate by 18.43 percent, while lowering intercellular carbon dioxide concentration, a sign that carbon was being fixed more vigorously. More dramatically, the activities of four key nitrogen-metabolism enzymes surged: nitrate reductase by 64.95 percent, glutamate dehydrogenase by 36.63 percent, glutamine synthetase by 22.07 percent, and glutamate synthetase by 60.41 percent. These enzymes form the biochemical pipeline that converts soil nitrate into amino acids, and their heightened activity indicates that the slow-release nitrogen was not merely present in the soil but actively being assimilated into plant metabolism throughout the season.</p>
<p>The concept that unifies the paper&#8217;s findings is the source-flow-sink framework, a classical model of crop yield formation. The source comprises the leaves that capture sunlight and build sugars; the flow is the vascular transport system that moves stored assimilates from stems and leaves into the developing ears; and the sink is the grain itself, whose capacity and activity determine how much of that assimilate can actually be packed into harvestable kernels. Salt stress sabotages all three links simultaneously. High pH and osmotic pressure impair root uptake of water and nutrients, reactive oxygen species accelerate chloroplast breakdown and leaf senescence, and poor assimilate supply starves the grain-filling process, shrinking both grain number and grain weight. The controlled-release fertilizer, the researchers found, repaired each link in sequence.</p>
<p>On the flow side, the results were particularly emphatic. Dry matter translocation, the movement of carbohydrates stored in stems and leaves into the grain after flowering, rose by 76.06 percent under T50 compared with urea alone, and the contribution of these pre-anthesis reserves to final grain yield climbed by nearly 18 percent. Grain filling, modeled with a logistic growth curve that fit the data with coefficients of determination above 0.98, was faster and heavier: the maximum filling rate increased by 32.48 percent, the average filling rate by 49.01 percent, and the peak filling date arrived nine days earlier. Ear weight, kernels per ear, and hundred-grain weight all rose by roughly 10 to 19 percent, confirming that the sink had genuinely expanded rather than simply being fed longer.</p>
<p>Why did 50 percent substitution outperform both lower and higher ratios? The authors argue that the answer lies in matching the nitrogen supply curve to the crop&#8217;s demand curve. Conventional urea floods the soil with available nitrogen early, promoting lush vegetative growth that later collapses into premature senescence when the supply runs out just as the grain-filling demand peaks. Pure controlled-release fertilizer, by contrast, releases nitrogen too slowly at the start, failing to support the rapid canopy expansion between the six-leaf and twelve-leaf stages and limiting the photosynthetic machinery that must be built early. The 50 percent blend, with conventional urea topdressed at two early stages and coated urea releasing steadily through mid-season, delivers what the authors describe as an early-stage support, mid-stage stability, late-stage sustainability pattern, sustaining leaf function precisely when salt stress would otherwise cut photosynthesis short.</p>
<p>The team backed these physiological interpretations with a battery of statistical tools. Mantel tests confirmed significant correlations between the substitution ratio and source traits such as leaf area index, leaf area duration, and chlorophyll content. Random forest modeling ranked dry matter translocation rate, stomatal conductance, and glutamate synthetase activity as the top contributors to grain yield, while grain weight per ear and mean filling rate dominated predictions of nitrogen use efficiency and irrigation water productivity. A partial least squares structural equation model then tied the whole story together: the substitution ratio acted positively on source, flow, and sink characteristics, with the strongest path coefficient, 0.71, linking it to sink traits, and sink characteristics in turn showed the strongest association with grain yield at 0.76. The model also revealed a negative association between the substitution ratio and the source-sink ratio, indicating a better balance between leaf supply and grain demand.</p>
<p>The efficiency gains carry real economic and environmental weight. Agronomic efficiency of nitrogen, the yield gained per kilogram of fertilizer applied, jumped by 72.79 percent under the optimal treatment, while nitrogen recovery efficiency rose by 68.39 percent and apparent recovery by 40.40 percent. Because irrigation volumes were identical across treatments, the 18.06 percent gain in irrigation water productivity reflects purely the yield increase, meaning every cubic meter of scarce irrigation water in this arid basin produced more grain. The authors caution, however, that their conclusions rest on two years of data from a single site, one maize cultivar, and a warm temperate continental climate, and that nitrogen loss pathways such as ammonia volatilization and nitrate leaching were inferred indirectly from plant uptake rather than measured directly in the soil.</p>
<p>Even with those caveats, the implications are considerable for a country wrestling with food security on degraded land. Controlled-release fertilizers remain more expensive than commodity urea, but a 50 percent substitution strategy halves the added cost while capturing most of the agronomic benefit, and the yield and efficiency gains documented here suggest the premium could pay for itself in saline-alkali regions. As China pushes to bring its vast salt-affected reserves into productive agriculture, the study offers a physiologically grounded template: rather than simply applying more fertilizer, farmers may get far more from every kilogram by controlling when the nitrogen arrives. The humble polymer coating, it turns out, does not just slow a chemical reaction. It re-orchestrates the entire source-flow-sink economy of the maize plant, turning hostile soil into a stage for one of the more quietly impressive yield breakthroughs of recent agronomy.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Controlled-release fertilizer substitution effects on maize source-sink physiology, yield, and water-nitrogen use efficiency in saline-alkali soil</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Controlled-release fertilizer substitution boosts maize yield and water-nitrogen use efficiency via optimizing source-sink characteristics in saline-alkali soil</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Controlled-release fertilizer substitution boosts maize yield and water-nitrogen use efficiency via optimizing source-sink characteristics in saline-alkali soil. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2026.103312" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2026.103312</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2026.103312" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.jafr.2026.103312</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> maize, controlled-release fertilizer, saline-alkali soil, nitrogen use efficiency, source-sink relationship, grain filling, dry matter translocation, irrigation water productivity, Ningxia, urea, photosynthesis, soil salinity</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">220742</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
