<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neofusicoccum luteum &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/neofusicoccum-luteum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 16:43:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Hidden Fungus Emerges as a Suspect in the Decline of Coastal Norfolk Island Pines</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/hidden-fungus-emerges-as-a-suspect-in-the-decline-of-coastal-norfolk-island-pines/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roger Howard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 16:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Araucaria heterophylla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Botryosphaeriaceae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drought stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fungal endophytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gold Coast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Koch's postulates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neofusicoccum luteum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norfolk Island pine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant pathology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban forestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[urban tree decline]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=217246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A fungus never before recorded on Norfolk Island pines has been isolated from declining Gold Coast trees and shown in glasshouse trials to infect saplings and slow their growth, positioning drought stress and latent Botryosphaeriaceae pathogens as joint drivers of an iconic urban tree's decline.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Along the foreshores of Australia&#8217;s Gold Coast, the towering Norfolk Island pines that have defined the skyline for generations are quietly dying. The trees, Araucaria heterophylla, are showing canopy dieback, browning foliage tips, progressive defoliation, and shortened branchlets, and for decades the causes remained murky. A new study published in Environmental Management by Anna Petrova of Griffith University and colleagues now adds a crucial piece to the puzzle: a fungus called Neofusicoccum luteum, never before documented on this species, is present in a quarter of the declining trees sampled and is capable of infecting healthy saplings under controlled conditions. The finding does not convict the fungus outright, but it firmly places an opportunistic pathogen on the list of suspects behind one of Australia&#8217;s most visible urban tree declines.</p>
<p>The Norfolk Island pine is an unlikely victim. Introduced from Norfolk Island to mainland Australia in the late eighteenth century, the species possesses physiological traits that should make it well suited to coastal life. It is isohydric, meaning it regulates its leaf water potential to stay within safe limits regardless of soil moisture, and it shows halophytic properties that allow it to tolerate salt in the root zone. Yet mature trees in New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, and Western Australia have long exhibited decline symptoms, and many are now recognized as heritage and cultural icons whose loss would reshape entire coastal streetscapes. Previous work has pointed to abiotic stressors, including elevated sodium levels linked to surfactant exposure, soil compaction, proximity to urban infrastructure, and extreme weather events, while biotic suspects have included fungi from the genera Lasiodiplodia and Neofusicoccum.</p>
<p>To identify which fungi actually inhabit declining trees, the researchers sampled thirty-two mature A. heterophylla of varying health along the Gold Coast foreshore. From each tree they collected three roughly one-centimeter branchlet segments with leaves, surface-sterilized the tissue in 1.5 percent sodium hypochlorite for two minutes, triple-rinsed it in sterile water, and cultured it on Potato Dextrose Agar at 25 degrees Celsius for two to three weeks. The team then extracted high-molecular-weight DNA from the resulting isolates using a modified CTAB protocol, grinding mycelium under liquid nitrogen and purifying the genetic material through a series of precipitation and ethanol-wash steps. DNA integrity, purity, and quantity were verified by gel electrophoresis, Nanodrop, and Qubit before sequencing.</p>
<p>The sequencing strategy itself reflects a shift in how plant pathology is done. Rather than relying solely on traditional Sanger sequencing, the team used Oxford Nanopore long-read sequencing on an Mk1C device, reasoning that rapid genus-level identification could eventually support field diagnostics. Basecalled reads were taxonomically classified with Kraken2 against the full NCBI nucleotide database, with stringent confidence and base-quality thresholds, and matches of interest were confirmed by reciprocal BLASTn. Ambiguous or particularly interesting isolates were sent to Grow Help Australia, the Queensland Government&#8217;s plant pest diagnostic service, for species-level confirmation via PCR and dual-direction Sanger sequencing. In total, sixteen fungal species from ten genera were recovered, and three genera contained known pathogens: Nigrospora, Alternaria, and Neofusicoccum.</p>
<p>One species stood out. Neofusicoccum luteum, isolated from eight of the thirty-two trees, or 25 percent, had never previously been reported on A. heterophylla, even though a comprehensive 2022 review of Araucariaceae pathogens catalogued many of its Botryosphaeriaceae relatives. Elsewhere, N. luteum has a rap sheet: it causes dieback on rhododendrons in Spain, canker on English oak in Portugal, fruit rot and leaf necrosis on olives in Australia, disease on tejocote in the United States, and infection in Pinot noir grapevines in New Zealand. Members of the Botryosphaeriaceae are classic latent pathogens, living quietly inside woody hosts as endophytes and switching to aggressive disease when trees are stressed by drought, heat, or physical damage. That lifestyle makes them especially dangerous in cities, where multiple stresses converge.</p>
<p>To test whether N. luteum actually causes disease, the researchers turned to Koch&#8217;s postulates, the century-and-a-half-old framework for establishing causation between a microbe and a malady. Forty healthy two-year-old pines from the City of Gold Coast nursery were divided into four groups in a Brisbane glasshouse during the Australian summer: pathogen-inoculated and watered, pathogen-inoculated and drought-stressed, sterile-agar controls watered, and sterile-agar controls drought-stressed. Each tree received three shallow two-centimeter stem wounds into which a three-by-three-millimeter mycelial plug was inserted under the bark, sealed with wet cotton and parafilm. After ten days of uniform watering, the drought groups were cut off from irrigation entirely, while the watered groups continued receiving 700 milliliters every second day. Glasshouse temperatures fluctuated between 18.6 and 34.2 degrees Celsius over the six-week experiment.</p>
<p>The results were striking but nuanced. Infection rates exceeded 90 percent in both inoculated groups, and lesions developed even in the sterile-agar controls, though these were significantly smaller. Lesion size was significantly greater in both watered and drought-stressed pathogen-inoculated trees than in controls, with Benjamini-Hochberg-adjusted p-values at or below 0.003, although drought did not significantly change lesion size within the inoculated treatment. More tellingly, under regular watering, trees inoculated with the fungus were significantly shorter than watered controls, indicating that even sublethal infection slows growth, likely because lesions extending into xylem tissue impair water and nutrient transport. Re-isolation confirmed the pathogen in 75 percent of drought-stressed trees but only 25 percent of watered trees, meaning Koch&#8217;s postulates were only partially fulfilled, possibly because unidentified secondary invaders outcompeted N. luteum in some lesions.</p>
<p>The authors are careful about what this means. N. luteum appears to contribute to the decline of Norfolk Island pines, they conclude, but it is unlikely to be the sole causal agent and cannot kill a tree rapidly; no mortality occurred during the trial. Instead, the picture that emerges is of a latent endophyte flipping into pathogenic mode under stress. The Gold Coast endured punishing drought before the study, with 2019 receiving just 825.6 millimeters of rain, barely above the 1986 record low, and summer temperatures in 2019 and 2017 well above long-term means. Many trees were also crown-lifted, their lower branches pruned, ahead of the 2018 Commonwealth Games, creating wounds and potential infection pathways. Prolonged heat and drought, the researchers suggest, may have promoted the transition of latent infections into active disease rather than enabling new infections outright.</p>
<p>Management implications follow directly. The team recommends supplementary irrigation during prolonged drought to keep trees vigorous enough to resist pathogen entry through damaged bark, along with consistent tree health monitoring. Soil improvement to enhance water-holding capacity may help, and the routine necessity of crown lifting deserves reassessment given the wounds it creates. Treatment options remain limited: no universal control exists for Neofusicoccum species, and while grapevine research has shown promise for biocontrol agents such as Bacillus velezensis and Trichoderma species, and for fungicides including tebuconazole and pyraclostrobin, frequent application is impractical on tall heritage trees in public spaces. Prevention, the authors argue, offers tall trees a better chance of survival than cure, particularly since infections become progressively harder to control once established.</p>
<p>The study also opens several research frontiers. The pathogenic potential of the Nigrospora and Alternaria alternata isolates remains unknown, and co-infection experiments are needed to determine whether fungal combinations drive more severe decline. Intriguingly, two Trichoderma species, well-known biological control agents, were naturally isolated from six of the sampled trees, hinting at an in-built defense whose dynamics have yet to be explored. Sampling was restricted to lower branches for access reasons, leaving the upper canopy&#8217;s fungal communities uncharted. And as climate change intensifies heat waves and drought in cities worldwide, the lessons from the Gold Coast extend far beyond one species: protecting mature urban trees, and selecting drought-tolerant, pathogen-resistant stock, may determine whether the green canopies that cool streets, filter air, and anchor coastal identity survive the century ahead.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Pathogenicity of the fungus Neofusicoccum luteum in declining urban Norfolk Island pines (Araucaria heterophylla) on the Gold Coast, Australia</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Urban Tree Pathogens: The Impact of Neofusicoccum luteum on Araucaria heterophylla (Norfolk Island Pine)</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Petrova, A., Pratt, C., Bar, I., T Sambasivam, P., &amp; Michael, R. N. (2026). Urban Tree Pathogens: The Impact of Neofusicoccum luteum on Araucaria heterophylla (Norfolk Island Pine). <em>Environmental Management, 76</em>(10), Article 332. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-026-02633-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-026-02633-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-026-02633-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00267-026-02633-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Neofusicoccum luteum, Araucaria heterophylla, Norfolk Island pine, urban tree decline, Botryosphaeriaceae, plant pathology, Koch&#x27;s postulates, drought stress, Gold Coast, fungal endophytes, urban forestry, Environmental Management</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">217246</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
