Migrasomes are a relatively recently characterized organelle. First described as large vesicles that form on the long retraction fibers left behind when a migrating cell pulls itself forward, they accumulate cellular contents before being released or taken up by neighboring cells. The new study demonstrates that circulating tumor cells, as they squeeze through vascular channels and navigate the demanding physical environment of the bloodstream, produce migrasomes loaded with tumor-derived antigens. This finding reframes migrasomes from a curiosity of cell biology into a consequential player in cancer immunology, one that links the mechanical act of tumor cell migration to the triggering of adaptive immune responses.

The central immunological mechanism at work in the study is cross-presentation, the specialized ability of certain antigen-presenting cells, most notably dendritic cells, to display fragments of extracellular proteins on MHC class I molecules. This pathway is essential because cytotoxic CD8-positive T cells can only recognize antigens presented in this manner. When dendritic cells engulf the antigen-bearing migrasomes shed by circulating tumor cells, they process the tumor proteins and present peptide fragments on their surface, effectively showing the immune system a wanted poster of the metastasizing cancer. Naive CD8-positive T cells that recognize these fragments can then expand into armed effector cells capable of seeking out and killing tumor cells that display the same antigens.

What makes the discovery especially striking is its paradoxical framing: metastasis itself enables immunogenicity. The very traits that allow tumor cells to disseminate, including their motility, their deformation through narrow vessels, and their production of retraction fibers and migrasomes, simultaneously generate the antigen-release route that exposes them to immune surveillance. In this sense, the metastatic phenotype carries an intrinsic cost. A tumor cell that migrates aggressively through the circulation sheds more migrasomes, and by doing so provides more antigen for dendritic cells to capture and present. The authors show that this antigen release can activate CD8-positive T cells, and that the resulting T cell response acts to restrict metastasis rather than facilitate it.

From a technical standpoint, the study implies that migrasome shedding constitutes a previously underappreciated antigen source in the metastatic setting. Traditional models of tumor antigen release have emphasized cell death, with necrotic or apoptotic tumor cells spilling their contents, and secretion of soluble proteins or exosomes. Migrasomes add a distinct route: antigen export coupled directly to live cell migration. Because the migrasomes form on retraction fibers during active locomotion, this antigen release does not require tumor cell death and may therefore occur continuously and at low levels during the earliest phases of dissemination, potentially priming the immune system before a metastatic colony becomes established.

The engagement of CD8-positive T cells through cross-presentation is significant for cancer immunotherapy. Modern approaches such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and therapeutic cancer vaccines depend on the existence of pre-existing or inducible T cell responses against tumor antigens. If migrasome-mediated antigen release contributes to natural priming of anti-tumor T cells, then the efficiency of this process could influence which patients respond to immunotherapy. Tumors or microenvironments that suppress migrasome formation, interfere with dendritic cell uptake, or block cross-presentation might evade immune detection even while shedding antigen. Conversely, therapies that enhance migrasome production or improve cross-presentation could strengthen endogenous anti-metastatic immunity.

The findings also carry implications for understanding metastatic tropism and relapse. Metastatic recurrence frequently emerges months or years after removal of a primary tumor, driven by disseminated tumor cells that linger in distant tissues. If migrasome-mediated antigen release can prime CD8-positive T cells capable of restricting metastasis, then the balance between migrasome-driven immune priming and immune evasion may help determine whether disseminated cells are eliminated or allowed to persist. Therapeutic strategies that tip this balance toward immunity, for example by vaccinating patients with antigens delivered in a migrasome-like format or by combining checkpoint blockade with agents that promote antigen cross-presentation, could in principle convert the metastatic process into a self-limiting event.

The study also broadens the emerging appreciation of extracellular vesicles as coordinators of immunity. Exosomes, microvesicles, and now migrasomes each carry distinct cargo and follow distinct biogenesis pathways, and their immunological consequences can be opposing: some vesicle populations suppress immunity while others, as shown here, promote T cell activation. Distinguishing these populations and understanding which vesicle types dominate in a given tumor context will be essential for designing interventions. The migrasome pathway, being tied to cell migration, is unusually amenable to modulation by factors that affect tumor cell motility, cytoskeletal dynamics, and vascular transit, offering multiple points of potential pharmacological control.

Looking forward, the work suggests several concrete research directions: quantifying migrasome shedding in patient blood samples as a biomarker of immune priming, mapping which dendritic cell subsets capture migrasomes most efficiently, and testing whether engineered migrasomes loaded with defined tumor antigens can serve as vaccines against metastasis. The image that emerges is one of a cancer cell caught in a biological dilemma. Movement is what makes metastasis lethal, but movement also forces the cell to leave behind membrane-bound fingerprints that the immune system can read. Harnessing that dilemma, the study suggests, may become a new frontier in the effort to stop cancer from spreading.

Subject of Research: Migrasome-mediated tumor antigen release during metastasis and its activation of CD8-positive T cell immunity

Article Title: Metastasis enables immunogenicity through migrasome-mediated antigen release

Article References: Jiang, D., He, J., Xie, R., Shi, M., Liu, S., Jia, H., Yang, B., Ruan, X., Tao, X., Xiang, Y., Chen, Y., Jiao, L., Feng, X., & Yu, L. (2026). Metastasis enables immunogenicity through migrasome-mediated antigen release. Nature Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-026-02641-0

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1038/s41590-026-02641-0

Keywords: metastasis, migrasomes, circulating tumor cells, tumor antigens, cross-presentation, CD8-positive T cells, Nature Immunology, cancer immunology, dendritic cells, extracellular vesicles, anti-tumor immunity, cancer immunotherapy

Antiretroviral therapy transformed HIV from a nearly uniform death sentence into a manageable chronic condition by blocking new rounds of infection. Yet the therapy does nothing to the proviral DNA already stitched into the genomes of long-lived host cells. As soon as treatment lapses, the reservoir seeds rapid viral rebound. Understanding why particular infected clones persist for years, while others decay, has therefore become one of the most consequential questions in HIV research, and the new findings suggest the answer lies partly in the immune environment the reservoir cells inhabit rather than in the virus alone.

Natural killer cells are innate lymphocytes that patrol the body and kill stressed or infected cells without requiring the antigen-specific recognition that defines T and B lymphocytes. Their activity is governed by a delicate balance of activating and inhibitory receptors. KIR2DL1 is an inhibitory killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor that recognizes specific HLA class I molecules, the same surface proteins that HIV-exposed cells display. The education model of NK cell biology holds that a developing NK cell calibrates its functional competence through interactions between its inhibitory receptors and self-HLA; a KIR2DL1-positive NK cell in an individual carrying the corresponding HLA ligand becomes ‘educated,’ or licensed, to respond vigorously when that ligand is lost or altered, as frequently happens during viral infection.

The study demonstrates that these education states are not a fleeting influence but leave durable imprints on the reservoir. By examining cells from people who had spent years, in some cases many years, on suppressive antiretroviral regimens, the researchers found that proviruses surviving over the long term were not distributed randomly across the infected cell population. Instead, their persistence correlated with features of the innate immune landscape, indicating that some infected cells had been preferentially spared or eliminated depending on how the NK cell compartment of that individual had been trained.

This reframes the reservoir as an active participant in a prolonged evolutionary standoff with the immune system. Cells harboring intact, replication-competent proviruses that somehow avoid NK-mediated killing gain a survival advantage and expand, sometimes through clonal proliferation, over years of therapy. Cells that present vulnerabilities to educated NK cells are progressively culled. The result is a reservoir sculpted by immune pressure, analogous in some respects to how antigen escape shapes the evolution of the virus in untreated infection, but operating here through germline-encoded innate receptors rather than clonal adaptive recognition.

The technical achievement underlying these conclusions is considerable. Single-cell approaches now allow researchers to connect proviral sequence, integration site, transcriptional state, and surface phenotype in the same individual cell, converting what was once a population-level average into a high-resolution map of reservoir heterogeneity. Combined with deep characterization of NK cell receptor repertoires and their HLA ligands in each study participant, such methods make it possible to ask which immune configurations leave measurable signatures on which reservoir lineages, and the study deployed precisely this integrative strategy across cohorts on long-term therapy.

The clinical implications are potentially far-reaching. Current cure strategies aim to ‘shock and kill’ the reservoir, using latency-reversing agents to force latent proviruses into expression so that immune or pharmacological effectors can destroy the exposed cells. If KIR2DL1-educated NK cells already exert selection pressure on the reservoir, then the efficiency of such interventions may depend heavily on whether the killing arm of the strategy is matched to the individual’s NK cell education status and HLA type. A shock-and-kill regimen delivered to a person whose NK cells are poorly licensed against their own reservoir cells might flush virus into the open without achieving meaningful depletion.

This line of thinking points toward precision immunotherapies for HIV. Just as cancer immunotherapy increasingly considers the tumor microenvironment and the patient’s innate immune competence, curative interventions for HIV may need to account for innate immune imprints. Engaging NK cells deliberately, through bispecific killer-cell engagers, cytokine modulation, or engineered NK products, could in principle tip the standoff in favor of the host. Conversely, therapies that inadvertently impair NK education or function might relax selection pressure and allow reservoir clones to expand unchecked during what was assumed to be stable suppression.

The findings also resonate with a broader shift in virology: the recognition that innate immunity is not merely a rapid first response but a long-lived determinant of infection outcomes. Trained immunity, NK cell memory-like behavior, and receptor education all illustrate that innate cells carry histories. In chronic infections treated for years with suppressive drugs, those histories accumulate and leave fingerprints on the surviving pathogen population. HIV, the most intensively studied persistent human virus, now appears to bear such fingerprints in its reservoir.

Substantial questions remain. The relationship between KIR2DL1 education and reservoir persistence will need to be validated across larger and more diverse cohorts, since KIR and HLA genotype distributions vary substantially across populations, and HIV epidemiology is concentrated in regions where such genetic diversity is greatest. Whether innate selection can be therapeutically harnessed to shrink the reservoir, or only to shape it, is unresolved. But the conceptual contribution is clear: the latent HIV reservoir is not hidden from the immune system in any absolute sense. It has been living under innate immune surveillance all along, and the cells that persist during long-term antiretroviral therapy are, in part, the survivors of that surveillance. Any credible path to a cure will have to reckon with the imprints that this ancient arm of immunity has already left on the virus’s last refuge.

Subject of Research: The influence of KIR2DL1-educated natural killer cells on the persistence of latent HIV-1 reservoir cells during long-term antiretroviral therapy.

Article Title: Innate immune imprints shape HIV-1 reservoir cell persistence during long-term antiretroviral therapy

Article References: Tan, T. S., Sun, W., Gao, C., Viard, M., Walters, L. C., Lancien, M., Yuki, Y., Van, T. N., Casquero, C., Guo, X., Hoh, R., Haas, D. W., Michael, N., Kirk, G. D., Yendewa, G., Gandhi, R. T., Kassaye, S. G., Tien, P. C., Walker, B. D., … Lichterfeld, M. (2026). Innate immune imprints shape HIV-1 reservoir cell persistence during long-term antiretroviral therapy. Nature Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-026-02637-w

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1038/s41590-026-02637-w

Keywords: HIV-1, viral reservoir, natural killer cells, KIR2DL1, NK cell education, antiretroviral therapy, viral latency, innate immunity, HIV cure research, Nature Immunology, immunotherapy, proviral persistence

A new study from Korea University College of Medicine, published in Nature Immunology on June 15, 2026, offers a detailed molecular portrait of how an mRNA-based influenza vaccine may accomplish exactly that. Led by Associate Professor Jiwon Lee of the Department of Convergence Medicine and the Vaccine Innovation Center, and conducted in collaboration with Professor Ali Ellebedy and his group at Washington University in St. Louis, the investigation compared an investigational quadrivalent mRNA influenza vaccine, designated mRNA-1010, against the licensed conventional split-virion vaccine Fluarix in a head-to-head clinical evaluation. The central question was whether the mRNA platform could stimulate stronger and more persistent germinal-center responses than a conventional vaccine, and whether that persistence would translate into a measurably broader antibody repertoire in the blood.

The germinal center is the crucible where vaccine-induced immunity is forged. Within specialized microenvironments of draining lymph nodes, B cells that recognize vaccine antigen undergo rounds of proliferation, somatic hypermutation, and selection. Each cycle introduces random mutations into the genes encoding the B-cell receptor, and only those variants whose mutated receptors bind antigen with higher affinity are permitted to survive and expand. Over weeks, this Darwinian process generates plasma cells that secrete high-affinity antibodies and memory B cells that persist for years. The duration and intensity of germinal-center activity are therefore widely regarded as key determinants of both the breadth and the durability of antibody responses. A vaccine that keeps germinal centers active for longer gives B cells more opportunities to mutate, diversify, and explore antibody solutions that recognize conserved or varied features of the virus.

To test whether mRNA vaccination extends this critical phase, the researchers enrolled 75 healthy adults aged 20 to 50 years and followed them across two influenza seasons. Of these, 38 participants received mRNA-1010 and 37 received Fluarix. Blood samples were collected at multiple time points through 26 weeks after vaccination, allowing the team to track the evolution of circulating antibodies over nearly half a year. Crucially, a subset of participants also underwent ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of draining axillary lymph nodes, an invasive but informative procedure that enabled direct sampling of germinal centers as they formed and matured. This combination of peripheral blood monitoring and lymph-node sampling is rare in human vaccine studies and gave the investigators an unusually complete view of the immune response as it unfolded in real time.

The laboratory analysis was correspondingly comprehensive. The team deployed flow cytometry to characterize immune cell populations, ELISpot assays to quantify antigen-specific antibody-secreting cells, single-cell RNA sequencing and B-cell receptor sequencing to resolve individual B-cell lineages, serum IgG proteomics to catalog circulating antibody clonotypes, and a battery of antibody binding and neutralization assays to test functional activity against antigenically diverse influenza strains. Together, these methods profiled the response at scales ranging from single cells to whole serum, providing a multidimensional dataset that conventional vaccine trials, which typically rely on bulk antibody titers alone, cannot match.

The findings were striking. The mRNA vaccine elicited a substantially more diverse and broader serum antibody repertoire than Fluarix, according to Dr. Lee. Most notably, influenza-specific germinal-center responses persisted for up to 26 weeks in 5 of 13 mRNA-1010 recipients whose draining lymph nodes were sampled, while persistent germinal centers were not detected among any of the Fluarix recipients sampled. Six months of sustained germinal-center activity after a single vaccination is an unusually long window of B-cell evolution, and it suggests that the mRNA platform provides antigen persistence and inflammatory signaling that keep the selection machinery running far longer than a conventional protein-based split-virion preparation.

That prolonged activity left a measurable imprint on the antibody repertoire. The mRNA vaccine increased the diversity of the serum IgG repertoire and promoted the diversification of pre-existing B-cell lineages through somatic hypermutation, meaning that antibodies the immune system had already learned to make against earlier influenza exposures were not merely recalled but actively refined and expanded. These molecular changes were associated with broader antibody binding across antigenically diverse influenza strains and with significantly greater increases in neutralization titers against 11 of 13 A/H1N1 viruses tested. In practical terms, the antibodies generated after mRNA vaccination recognized a wider range of viral variants and neutralized more of them, including strains that differed antigenically from those contained in the vaccine itself. Dr. Lee summarized the distinction succinctly: the mRNA platform does not simply produce more antibodies, it produces a more diversified antibody response, which leads to greater binding and neutralizing breadth.

A key methodological strength of the study was Ig-Seq, a mass-spectrometry-based technology that identifies individual antibody clonotypes circulating in the blood after vaccination. Conventional vaccine studies typically measure bulk binding or neutralization titers, aggregate numbers that reveal how much antibody activity is present but say little about its composition. Ig-Seq resolves the response down to individual antibody clonotypes, revealing which antibody lineages emerged, expanded, and diversified after vaccination. Combined with B-cell receptor sequencing, this molecular-level approach allowed the researchers to trace the genealogical trees of antibody families as they mutated and branched over the six-month observation period, directly linking sustained germinal-center activity in the lymph node to the diversification of antibodies measurable in the serum. The authors identify Ig-Seq as a defining strength of the work because it captures information that bulk serology fundamentally cannot.

The broader implications reach toward the long-sought goal of a more universal influenza vaccine. If mRNA vaccination can sustain germinal-center activity for months rather than weeks, it creates a temporal window in which B cells can accumulate mutations that broaden their recognition of the virus’s antigenic landscape. This mechanism could in principle support protection that carries over between seasons, reducing the need for annual reformulation and re-vaccination. However, the authors are careful to note that further studies are needed to determine whether these broadened responses translate into multi-season protection or permit longer vaccination intervals. The study population consisted of healthy adults aged 20 to 50, and future research must investigate whether the same benefits are maintained in older adults and immunocompromised populations, whose germinal-center function, B-cell repertoire diversity, and overall immune responsiveness differ substantially from those of healthy younger recipients.

What the study establishes, with unusual molecular resolution, is a mechanistic bridge between a vaccine platform and the quality of the immunity it generates. Persistent germinal centers, diversified B-cell lineages, and a broader serum antibody repertoire form a coherent causal chain, and tools such as Ig-Seq now make each link observable in humans. As mRNA technology matures beyond its first applications, findings like these suggest that its most consequential contribution to vaccinology may lie not in speed of development but in the depth and breadth of the immune memory it leaves behind, offering a rational template for influenza vaccines designed to stay ahead of a virus that never stops changing.

Subject of Research: A clinical study comparing mRNA-1010 and Fluarix influenza vaccines in healthy adults, examining germinal-center persistence and antibody repertoire breadth

Article Title: Korea University study uncovers how mRNA vaccination may broaden flu antibody responses

Article References: Korea University study uncovers how mRNA vaccination may broaden flu antibody responses. (n.d.). Original publication

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: Not provided

Keywords: mRNA vaccine, influenza, germinal center, antibody breadth, B cells, somatic hypermutation, Ig-Seq, neutralization, vaccinology, Nature Immunology, Korea University, immune repertoire

The central discovery of the work is that microbial adhesion to myeloid cells activates Piezo1, a mechanosensitive ion channel that converts mechanical forces into cellular signals. Piezo1, whose structural biology was elucidated in landmark cryo-electron microscopy studies over the past decade, is a large trimeric channel that opens in response to tension in the plasma membrane. When a microbe binds to the surface of a macrophage or dendritic cell, the physical tug and deformation of the membrane is apparently sufficient to gate Piezo1, allowing calcium to flood into the cytoplasm. This calcium influx is not a side effect; according to the study, it is a critical initiating event that precedes and enables the engagement of pattern recognition receptors and the inflammatory signaling they provoke.

This reframing has substantial conceptual implications. Immunology has traditionally organized its understanding of innate sensing around the chemical recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns, a framework that earned the Nobel Prize in 2011 and has dominated the field since. The Granucci team’s findings do not overturn that framework, but they add a necessary precondition. A bacterium floating freely in extracellular fluid, in this model, is invisible to the immune machinery even if it carries the classic molecular signatures of danger. Only when it adheres—when the physical interface between microbe and host membrane is established—does the sensing apparatus become competent to respond. Adhesion, in other words, is the gatekeeper; pattern recognition is the amplifier that acts downstream.

The mechanistic logic of the pathway is grounded in well-established biophysics. Piezo1 channels respond to membrane tension through curved, blade-like domains that flatten as the membrane stretches, pulling open the central pore. Bacterial adhesion generates exactly this kind of localized tension. As a microbe attaches through adhesins, lectins, or hydrophobic interactions with the glycocalyx, the plasma membrane at the contact site experiences mechanical deformation, and the cytoskeleton beneath it is recruited to stabilize the interface. The study indicates that these forces are transduced efficiently enough to open Piezo1 in the vicinity of the contact. The resulting calcium signal is spatially restricted at first, concentrated at the microbial attachment site, which may help explain how the cell can tailor its response to the precise location of the encounter.

Calcium is a versatile second messenger, and its role in immune cell activation is not new. Calcium fluxes downstream of T-cell receptor engagement, Fc receptor ligation, and complement signaling all drive transcriptional changes through calcineurin, nuclear factor of activated T cells, and related pathways. What distinguishes the new findings is the source and timing of the calcium signal. Here, the flux is not triggered by receptor recognition of a microbial molecule but by the purely mechanical act of attachment. The researchers show that blocking Piezo1—pharmacologically or genetically—attenuates the downstream activation of myeloid cells in response to microbial contact, demonstrating that the channel sits upstream of the classical pattern recognition pathways rather than in parallel with them.

The experimental strategy underlying these conclusions combined live-cell imaging with genetic and pharmacological perturbation. Myeloid cells were exposed to bacteria under conditions that allowed the investigators to separate adhesion from pattern recognition temporally and functionally. Calcium-sensitive fluorescent reporters revealed a burst of cytosolic calcium that coincided with microbial attachment and depended on Piezo1 expression. Cells lacking functional Piezo1 still bound microbes, confirming that adhesion per se was intact, but failed to mount the full downstream response. The downstream readouts—cytokine production, inflammatory gene expression, and antimicrobial effector functions—were correspondingly blunted. These results collectively position Piezo1 activation as an initiating event rather than an incidental consequence of cell activation.

One of the most interesting aspects of the work is what it suggests about the specificity and safety of innate immune responses. If any physical contact could open Piezo1, myeloid cells would face the problem of distinguishing microbial adhesion from innocuous mechanical stimulation. The study addresses this implicitly through the observation that microbial adhesion produces a sustained and spatially organized stimulus at the contact site, qualitatively different from transient or uniform membrane perturbations. Moreover, the calcium signal primed by Piezo1 does not by itself drive a full inflammatory program; it renders the cell permissive, so that the subsequent engagement of pattern recognition receptors provides the necessary molecular specificity. The two-step architecture—mechanical priming followed by chemical recognition—offers a built-in safeguard against spurious activation while ensuring that genuine microbial encounters are met with a robust response.

The findings also connect innate immunology to a broader renaissance in mechanobiology. Over the past fifteen years, mechanosensitive channels have been implicated in processes ranging from vascular development and red blood cell volume regulation to touch sensation and cancer cell migration. The immune system, with its constant physical engagement of surfaces, particles, and other cells, is an obvious arena for mechanotransduction, and Piezo1 has previously been reported to influence macrophage polarization and T cell migration. The new study extends this emerging picture to the very first moments of the innate immune response, suggesting that the mechanical biography of an immune cell—how it is touched, stretched, and deformed—shapes its immunological decisions as profoundly as the chemical signals it receives.

There are translational implications worth considering. Chronic inflammatory diseases, sepsis, and disorders of exaggerated innate activation might be modulated by targeting the adhesion-to-Piezo1 axis. Pharmacological modulators of Piezo1 exist, most notably the synthetic agonist Yoda1 and various inhibitors, and the channel is a growing target of drug discovery efforts. If microbial adhesion-driven Piezo1 activation proves to be a required step in inflammatory pathology, then damping this pathway could offer a way to blunt excessive inflammation without globally disabling pattern recognition—an approach that might preserve antimicrobial defense while limiting collateral tissue damage. Conversely, boosting early innate sensing at mucosal surfaces or in vaccine contexts could, in principle, be achieved by enhancing the mechanotransductive arm of the response, though such strategies would require careful validation of safety.

The study also raises questions that future research will need to resolve. Which of the many adhesion pathways between bacteria and myeloid cells are most effective at generating the membrane tension required to open Piezo1? How do microbes that actively resist adhesion, or that deliberately manipulate host mechanics, influence this pathway? Does the Piezo1-dependent priming signal interact with known co-stimulatory and inhibitory receptors on myeloid cells, and does it differ between tissue-resident macrophages, dendritic cell subsets, and recruited monocytes? And in vivo, where myeloid cells encounter complex, flowing environments and dense extracellular matrices, how prominent is adhesion-driven mechanotransduction relative to soluble danger signals? Answering these questions will determine how central the new mechanism is across infection models and physiological contexts.

Nevertheless, the conceptual contribution is clear and likely to resonate widely. The innate immune system, the study suggests, does not merely smell its enemies—it feels them first. The physical handshake between microbe and host cell, mediated through a mechanosensitive channel evolutionarily tuned to membrane tension, converts contact into calcium and calcium into competence. Pattern recognition receptors remain the discriminators that define the character of the immune response, but Piezo1 supplies the opening beat. For a field that has spent decades cataloguing the molecular shapes and chemical signatures that trigger immunity, the demonstration that adhesion-driven mechanics initiate the response is a reminder that biology’s earliest signals are often the simplest ones: a touch, a pull, and the opening of a pore.

Subject of Research: Mechanotransduction of microbial adhesion by the Piezo1 ion channel as an initiating event in innate immune activation.

Article Title: Microbial adhesion promotes Piezo1 activation to initiate innate immunity

Article References: Stucchi, G., Galli, M., Cozzi, S., Celant, A., Marongiu, L., Rocca, G., Colnaghi, F., Chelazzi, M. R., Polissi, A., Martorana, A. M., Pietrocola, G., Vai, M., Orlandi, I., Ostuni, R., Barresi, S., Lombardo, A., Innocenti, M., & Granucci, F. (2026). Microbial adhesion promotes Piezo1 activation to initiate innate immunity. Nature Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41590-026-02643-y

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1038/s41590-026-02643-y

Keywords: Piezo1, innate immunity, mechanotransduction, microbial adhesion, myeloid cells, calcium signaling, pattern recognition receptors, macrophages, dendritic cells, inflammation, immunology, Nature Immunology