<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>N-A-S-H gel &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/n-a-s-h-gel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:41:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Fly Ash and Slag Turn Dredged Mud Into Low-Carbon Embankment Filler</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/fly-ash-and-slag-turn-dredged-mud-into-low-carbon-embankment-filler/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 18:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alkali-activated materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alkali-activated waste materials for construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blast furnace slag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-A-S-H gel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dredged mud treatment for load-bearing applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dredged sludge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eco-friendly construction materials from fly ash and slag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embankment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentally friendly soil stabilization methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fly ash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fly ash and slag for low-carbon embankment construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolymer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas reduction in construction materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-strength water-resistant embankment fill from industrial byproducts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial waste-based binder for dredged mud stabilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative solutions for reducing construction-related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life Cycle Assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-carbon construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N-A-S-H gel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil stabilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable dredged soil reuse in port and highway projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste soil management and disposal alternatives]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=265667</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers show that an alkali-activated blend of fly ash and blast furnace slag can stabilize dredged waste soil for embankments, matching cement performance while cutting carbon emissions by about 99 percent.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every year, port expansions, highway projects and river dredging operations generate staggering volumes of waste soil that must be dumped, buried or otherwise disposed of at considerable cost to builders and the environment. A new study published in Case Studies in Construction Materials offers a compelling alternative: transform that unwanted sludge into a strong, water-resistant embankment filling material using a binder made almost entirely from industrial waste. The research, led by Chen Zhang and colleagues, demonstrates that an alkali-activated blend of fly ash and blast furnace slag can stabilize dredged silt so effectively that it rivals conventional cement treatment while slashing greenhouse gas emissions by roughly 99 percent.</p>
<p>The team&#8217;s starting material was dredged sludge from Nanjing, in China&#8217;s Jiangsu Province, a silty clay with a water content of 33 percent, a liquid limit of 35.3 percent and a plasticity index of 16.6. Classified as silty clay because of its 73 percent silt fraction, the soil in its natural state has a loose microstructure and poor mechanical strength, making it unsuitable for load-bearing embankment fill without treatment. Compaction testing showed the soil reaches its maximum dry density at a water content of 14 percent, a figure the researchers used to design their mixtures.</p>
<p>Rather than relying on Portland cement, whose production accounts for a substantial share of global carbon dioxide emissions, the researchers turned to two abundant industrial by-products. Fly ash, captured from coal combustion flue gases, is rich in silica and alumina, while granulated blast furnace slag from ironmaking contributes abundant calcium. Both materials pose disposal problems of their own; uncontrolled fly ash can generate airborne dust and contaminate water. Under alkaline activation with sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate, however, these wastes dissolve and recombine into powerful cementitious gels, turning a liability into a resource.</p>
<p>To find the best formulation, the team ran an orthogonal test program examining four variables: the fly ash to slag ratio, the sodium hydroxide to sodium silicate ratio, the total alkali content and the water to solid ratio. Variance analysis revealed that the fly ash to slag ratio exerted the strongest influence on compressive strength, followed by alkali content, water to solid ratio and finally the activator balance. The optimal recipe emerged as an equal 5:5 blend of fly ash and slag, a sodium hydroxide to sodium silicate ratio of 1:7, an alkali content of 10 percent by mass of the binder, and a water to solid ratio of 0.35. The researchers attributed the strength gains to abundant calcium aluminate crystals that fill pores when the activator chemistry is properly balanced, while too much or too little water either leaves binder unreacted or dilutes the activator concentration.</p>
<p>With the optimal binder in hand, the team blended it into the dredged soil at doses ranging from 2 to 10 percent by mass and cured the compacted cylindrical specimens for 28 days under standard laboratory conditions of 20 degrees Celsius and 95 percent humidity, deliberately avoiding the high-temperature curing that pure fly ash geopolymers typically require. The results showed a clear threshold effect. Below about 4 percent binder content, the newly formed gel mainly repairs the cohesive soil structure disturbed by mixing, so properties improve only modestly. Above that threshold, enough gel is produced to bond soil particles into a genuinely new, stable skeleton, and performance climbs steeply. Compared with untreated soil, the 10 percent mixture delivered a 110 percent gain in compressive strength, a 106 percent increase in toughness index, a 243 percent boost in tensile strength and an 85 percent improvement in the water stability coefficient.</p>
<p>That last metric matters enormously for embankments, which must survive rainfall and saturation. The researchers saturated specimens after 21 days of curing and compared their strength with samples kept dry. Stress-strain curves showed the stabilized soil fails in a softening, plastic manner rather than shattering brittlely, absorbing energy before gradually losing load capacity. The toughness index, calculated as the area under the stress-strain curve up to peak strain, quantified this resistance to brittle fracture and rose steadily with binder dose.</p>
<p>Head-to-head against a conventional 4 percent cement-stabilized control, the picture was nuanced. At equal 4 percent dosage, the alkali-activated material lagged behind cement, with compressive strength, tensile strength and water stability reduced by 44, 53 and 21 percent respectively, because cement&#8217;s higher calcium content generates more calcium silicate hydrate gel. But at 10 percent dosage, the waste-based binder overtook cement on every measure, edging ahead by 4 percent in compression, 13 percent in tension and 14 percent in water stability. The trade-off is more binder, but one made entirely from wastes that would otherwise be landfilled.</p>
<p>The environmental accounting is where the new binder truly shines. Using life cycle assessment aligned with ISO 14040, the team quantified global warming potential, acidification, eutrophication, photochemical ozone creation and resource consumption for stabilizing one tonne of soil. The 4 percent alkali-activated mixture cut global warming potential by 99 percent relative to cement treatment, from 71.6 kilograms to 0.363 kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent, while acidification, eutrophication and photochemical oxidation potentials fell by 100, 99 and 91 percent and resource consumption dropped 98 percent. Even the 10 percent mixture, using twice the binder mass, reduced global warming potential by 99 percent and resource consumption by 95 percent compared with the cement control.</p>
<p>To understand why the material performs so well, the researchers deployed an arsenal of microscopic techniques: X-ray diffraction, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, thermogravimetric analysis, scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectroscopy, and nuclear magnetic resonance. Electron images revealed that untreated soil consists of blocky, flaky and flocculated particle aggregates riddled with voids, while the 10 percent mixture forms a dense fabric of flocculent gel bonding particles into lumpy aggregates. Image analysis showed porosity falling by 25 percent at 4 percent binder and 70 percent at 10 percent. Nuclear magnetic resonance confirmed that large pores declined by 75 percent and small pores by 28 percent at the highest dose, indicating the gel primarily bridges particles and eliminates large voids while also filling finer ones. Notably, no spherical fly ash particles survived, evidence that the ash dissolved and reacted almost completely.</p>
<p>The spectroscopic data converged on a clear chemical mechanism. Elemental analysis detected oxygen, sodium, aluminum, silicon and calcium, with sodium, calcium and aluminum to silicon ratios rising sharply with binder dose. Under the alkaline conditions created by sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate, Ca-O, Na-O, Al-O and Si-O bonds break, releasing calcium ions, sodium ions, aluminate and silicate species that then geopolymerize. Slag-derived calcium forms calcium silicate hydrate and calcium aluminosilicate hydrate gels, while fly ash contributes to sodium aluminosilicate hydrate, the signature N-A-S-H gel of alkali-activated systems. X-ray diffraction identified these new gel phases alongside the soil&#8217;s native quartz, illite and kaolinite; infrared spectra showed strengthened Si-O and Al-O absorption bands; and thermal analysis recorded additional mass losses from gel decomposition and bound water, cross-validating the mechanism. The gels weld soil particles into a stable skeleton and fill pores, explaining the dramatic mechanical and durability gains. The authors note that future work must test the material against sulfate attack, high temperatures and freeze-thaw cycling, but the study establishes that two of the world&#8217;s most troublesome industrial wastes can jointly convert dredged mud into a durable, genuinely low-carbon construction material.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Alkali-activated fly ash and blast furnace slag stabilization of dredged waste soil for sustainable embankment construction</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Applicability and chemical mechanism of alkali-activated fly ash and blast furnace slag stabilized soil for sustainable embankment</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Zhang, C., Wang, W., Zhu, Z., Li, N., Jang, P., &amp; Ma, B. (2026). Applicability and chemical mechanism of alkali-activated fly ash and blast furnace slag stabilized soil for sustainable embankment. <em>Case Studies in Construction Materials, 25</em>, Article e06619. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06619" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06619</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06619" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06619</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> alkali-activated materials, fly ash, blast furnace slag, soil stabilization, embankment, geopolymer, dredged sludge, low-carbon construction, life cycle assessment, N-A-S-H gel, C-A-S-H gel, waste recycling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">265667</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microwave Curing Turns Waste Ceramic Powder Into a Rapid Clay-Strengthening Geopolymer</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/microwave-curing-turns-waste-ceramic-powder-into-a-rapid-clay-strengthening-geopolymer/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 01:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alkali-activated materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceramic factory waste reuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceramic waste powder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ceramic waste recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Circular economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compressive strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmentally friendly geotechnical solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeze-thaw durability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolymer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geopolymerization of clay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotechnical engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial waste valorization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaolinitic clay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-carbon soil stabilization methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microwave curing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microwave curing of geopolymers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microwave energy in civil engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[N-A-S-H gel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapid clay-strengthening techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rapid curing of stabilized soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil stabilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable soil stabilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste ceramic powder in construction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=232854</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers stabilized weak kaolinitic clay with recycled ceramic waste powder and microwave curing, achieving a 60-fold strength increase in just eight minutes of irradiation.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fine-grained kaolinitic clays have long been a headache for geotechnical engineers. Their strength collapses when wet, their compressibility is high, and their behavior shifts dramatically with every change in moisture. The traditional fix—blending in Portland cement or lime—works, but it carries a heavy carbon bill, since cement production is one of the largest industrial sources of carbon dioxide. Now a research team from Iran has combined two sustainability strategies into one process: recycling ceramic factory waste into a reactive binder and using microwave energy to cure the stabilized soil in minutes rather than weeks. The result, published in Case Studies in Construction Materials, is a stabilized clay roughly sixty times stronger than the untreated parent soil, achieved in a fraction of the usual curing time.</p>
<p>The base material was a natural, uncalcined kaolinitic clay from the Madan Kavan mine in Qazvin, Iran, a low-plasticity soil with a baseline unconfined compressive strength of just 0.29 megapascals. Into this matrix the researchers blended ceramic waste powder, or CWP, sourced from rejected sanitary ware and glazed tiles at a manufacturing facility in Rasht. After crushing, drying, and two hours of ball milling, the powder passed through a 75-micrometer sieve, yielding a fine precursor with a median particle size of 12.4 micrometers. Chemically, the CWP proved ideal for geopolymerization: X-ray fluorescence showed it contained 73.01 percent silica and 18.47 percent alumina, the two ingredients that dissolve under alkaline conditions and recombine into a three-dimensional sodium aluminosilicate hydrate gel, the glue that binds geopolymer systems together.</p>
<p>The experimental design was ambitious. The team ran a full factorial matrix of 243 specimens spanning three CWP dosages (5, 10, and 15 percent by weight), three sodium hydroxide concentrations (6, 8, and 10 molar), three nominal microwave power levels (200, 400, and 700 watts), and three exposure durations (4, 8, and 12 minutes). Every specimen was first compacted at its optimum moisture content, pre-cured for 24 hours at 65 degrees Celsius, and then irradiated in a 2.45-gigahertz multimode microwave cavity. In total, 498 specimens were fabricated, including ambient-cured controls, thermal-only controls, and a direct microwave group that skipped the pre-curing stage entirely. Those direct-irradiation specimens fared badly: without the thermal pre-cure, they suffered steam pressure buildup and catastrophic splitting within 60 to 90 seconds at 400 watts or higher, a vivid demonstration of why the two-stage regime matters.</p>
<p>The headline result came from the combination of 10 percent CWP, 8 molar sodium hydroxide, 400 watts, and 8 minutes of microwave exposure. That formulation reached an unconfined compressive strength of 17.59 megapascals, a 60.7-fold increase over the untreated soil and more than double the 7.35 megapascals achieved by the same mix after 28 days of conventional ambient curing. Compared with the 24-hour thermal-only baseline of 8.49 megapascals, the microwave step added roughly 107 percent more strength. The mechanism is fundamentally different from oven curing: instead of heat creeping inward from the surface by conduction, microwave energy is generated volumetrically through dipole rotation of water molecules and ionic conduction in the alkaline pore solution, accelerating dissolution of aluminosilicate phases and the polycondensation reactions that build the binding gel.</p>
<p>But the relationship between microwave energy and strength was emphatically not linear. Raising the power to 700 watts cut strength by about 29 percent relative to the 400-watt optimum, and extending exposure to 12 minutes reduced it by nearly 10 percent. Precision mass measurements told part of the story: cylinders irradiated at 700 watts lost 6.88 percent of their mass to evaporated water, nearly triple the loss at 400 watts. Scanning electron microscopy backed this up with numbers. Digital image analysis of micrographs showed the two-dimensional crack-area fraction climbing from 1.8 percent at the optimum condition to 4.3 percent at 700 watts, a 2.39-fold proliferation of microcracking. The researchers attribute this to internal vapor pressure building faster than the low-permeability clay fabric can vent it, combined with rapid desiccation that starves the forming gel of the pore fluid it needs to mature.</p>
<p>The alkaline activator concentration showed a similar sweet spot. Moving from 6 to 8 molar sodium hydroxide increased strength by 18.5 percent under the optimum microwave condition, because higher hydroxyl ion activity attacks the silicon-oxygen-silicon and silicon-oxygen-aluminum bonds in the clay and ceramic phases more aggressively, releasing more reactive species into solution. Pushing to 10 molar, however, reversed the trend. Excessive alkalinity promotes premature gel precipitation around unreacted particles, restricts ionic diffusion, and raises mixture viscosity, producing a less homogeneous binder. The same parabolic pattern held for CWP dosage: 10 percent was optimal, while 15 percent left partially reacted ceramic grains acting as rigid defects that disrupted stress transfer through the matrix.</p>
<p>Durability testing added a striking dimension. Using an adapted ASTM D560 freeze-thaw protocol with 12 closed-freezing and capillary-thawing cycles, the optimum formulation retained 97.0 percent of its initial strength, with cumulative mass loss of just 0.76 percent and water absorption of 1.12 percent. Untreated soil, by contrast, slaked to nothing after a single cycle. The microwave-cured matrix outperformed even the 28-day ambient-cured controls, which retained only about 90 percent of their strength. The researchers credit the pore-refinement effect of rapid geopolymerization: by filling large capillary pores with gel, the treatment removes the spaces where ice crystallization nucleates and expands, blunting the hydraulic pressures that normally shred stabilized clays through winter cycles.</p>
<p>Statistical analysis confirmed which variables mattered most. A four-way analysis of variance on the 243-observation dataset found that microwave power was the dominant factor, accounting for 31.18 percent of strength variability, followed by CWP dosage at 22.18 percent, exposure duration at 18.67 percent, and activator molarity at 14.30 percent. All interaction terms were significant, meaning the parameters cannot be optimized in isolation. Microstructural evidence tied the mechanical data to chemistry: at the optimum condition, image-based porosity fell to 7.5 percent, mercury intrusion porosimetry showed the macropore peak suppressed and shifted toward nanopores, and the principal silicon-oxygen stretching band in the infrared spectrum shifted from about 1110 to 1015 wavenumbers, signaling deep reorganization of the aluminosilicate framework. Energy-dispersive spectroscopy recorded the atomic sodium-to-aluminum ratio rising from essentially zero in raw soil to 0.96, consistent with extensive charge-balancing sodium incorporation into the developing gel network.</p>
<p>The authors are careful to frame this as a laboratory proof of concept rather than a field-ready recipe. The 8-minute optimum is specific to the 38-by-76-millimeter specimen geometry and the particular microwave cavity used, and the dielectric properties of the mixtures were never directly measured, so claims of uniform volumetric heating cannot be verified. Scaling up to pavement bases or in-situ ground improvement would require multi-physics electromagnetic-thermal modeling, specialized waveguide equipment to overcome microwave penetration limits, and formal life-cycle assessment, since the sodium hydroxide and sodium silicate activators carry substantial embodied emissions of their own. Still, the core demonstration stands: a household-scale microwave dose of roughly 0.053 kilowatt-hours per specimen compressed weeks of binder development into minutes, while diverting ceramic waste from landfill. If the kinetics survive scale-up, the humble kitchen microwave may yet earn a place in heavy civil engineering.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Microwave-assisted alkali-activated stabilization of kaolinitic soil using ceramic waste powder</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Microwave-promoted geopolymerization of kaolinitic soil blended with ceramic waste powder: Role of alkaline activator concentration and curing regime efficiency</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Hosseini, H. T. J., Salimzadehshooiili, M., Ranjbar, P. Z., Arabani, M., &amp; Shalchian, M. M. (2026). Microwave-promoted geopolymerization of kaolinitic soil blended with ceramic waste powder: Role of alkaline activator concentration and curing regime efficiency. <em>Case Studies in Construction Materials, 25</em>, Article e06587. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06587" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06587</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06587" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.cscm.2026.e06587</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> geopolymer, soil stabilization, ceramic waste powder, microwave curing, kaolinitic clay, alkali-activated materials, compressive strength, freeze-thaw durability, sustainable construction, N-A-S-H gel, circular economy, geotechnical engineering</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">232854</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
