<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mycobacterium tuberculosis &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/mycobacterium-tuberculosis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 01:08:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Mapping 25 Years of Molecular Diagnostics Against WHO Priority Superbugs</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/mapping-25-years-of-molecular-diagnostics-against-who-priority-superbugs/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 01:08:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antimicrobial Resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bibliometric analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bibliometric analysis of antimicrobial resistance research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbapenemase genes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citation analysis of antimicrobial resistance studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRISPR diagnostics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterobacterales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future directions in molecular diagnostics for resistant bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genomic epidemiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global public health and antibiotic resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth of diagnostic research from 2000 to 2025]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of post-pandemic surge on diagnostic innovations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mapping research focus on WHO bacterial priority pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular diagnostics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular diagnostics for antimicrobial resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MRSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mycobacterium tuberculosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research hotspots in molecular diagnostics for superbugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technological advancements in bacterial resistance detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends in molecular diagnostic tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHO priority pathogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WHO priority superbugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whole genome sequencing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=200344</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A 25-year bibliometric analysis of 1,746 publications reveals how molecular diagnostics for WHO priority bacterial pathogens have reorganized around whole-genome sequencing and emerging resistance threats.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antimicrobial resistance remains one of the most formidable threats to global public health, responsible for an estimated 4.95 million deaths associated with resistant bacterial infections in 2019, including 1.27 million deaths directly attributable to resistance. A new bibliometric study published in MicrobiologyOpen has now mapped a quarter-century of research into the molecular diagnostic tools designed to fight this threat, offering the most comprehensive structural picture yet of how the field has grown, where it has concentrated, and which technologies are poised to define its next phase.</p>
<p>The analysis, covering publications from 2000 to 2025, drew on the Scopus database and followed a PRISMA-adapted screening workflow to construct a final analytical corpus of 1,746 articles and reviews spanning 432 journals and involving 11,277 unique authors. The field has expanded at a compound annual growth rate of 17.10%, accumulating 42,075 citations with an average of 24.10 citations per document. Growth accelerated sharply after 2018: annual output rose from 84 publications in 2018 to 259 in 2025, a trajectory the study attributes to increasing prioritization of antimicrobial resistance on the global research agenda and a post-pandemic surge in translational diagnostic research.</p>
<p>To frame the analysis, the study anchored itself in the World Health Organization&#8217;s bacterial priority pathogen lists. The WHO&#8217;s 2017 framework classified resistant bacteria into critical, high, and medium priority categories, and its 2024 update expanded the list to 24 pathogens across 15 bacterial families using multicriteria decision analysis that weighed mortality, incidence, resistance trends, transmissibility, preventability, treatability, and the state of the drug development pipeline. The critical tier now includes carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, carbapenem-resistant and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales, and rifampicin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis, while carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa was moved from critical to high priority based on regional resistance trends and comparatively lower transmission capacity.</p>
<p>Against this backdrop, the bibliometric results reveal a field organized around distinct pathogen axes. Staphylococcus aureus dominated the corpus with 730 publications and 21,945 total citations, followed by Mycobacterium tuberculosis with 439 publications, Enterobacterales with 389, Pseudomonas aeruginosa with 309, Acinetobacter baumannii with 279, and Enterococcus faecium with 250. Growth over the past five years was strongest for Streptococcus pneumoniae at 27.79%, Pseudomonas aeruginosa at 26.35%, and Enterobacterales at 22.81%, signaling a decisive shift in research attention toward Gram-negative carbapenem resistance as the most urgent clinical frontier.</p>
<p>At the platform level, conventional PCR and nucleic acid amplification testing appeared in 61.51% of publications, while whole-genome sequencing featured in 55.44%, making these two technologies the twin pillars of the literature. Because platform categories were not mutually exclusive, many publications combined both approaches. Multiplex PCR stood out for impact, averaging 42.57 citations per article, reflecting the foundational role of early target-specific resistance detection. Emerging technologies, including nanopore sequencing, metagenomic sequencing, and CRISPR-based diagnostics, appeared at low frequencies but formed distinct and growing clusters, suggesting they represent innovation fronts that have not yet reached routine clinical integration.</p>
<p>Resistance marker analysis identified mecA/mecC, rpoB, blaNDM, katG, and vanA/vanB as the most frequently studied molecular targets. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci, epitomized by the mecA gene and its newer variant mecC, anchored the Gram-positive research tradition, while the tuberculosis markers rpoB, katG, and inhA defined a mature and specialized diagnostic axis. Carbapenemase genes, including blaKPC, blaNDM, and blaOXA-48, together with the mobile colistin resistance gene mcr and the fluoroquinolone targets gyrA and parC, showed the strongest recent growth, with gyrA and parC expanding at compound annual rates of 44.28% and 49.53% respectively over the last five years.</p>
<p>Thematic mapping of keyword co-occurrence networks revealed that the literature is structured around six interpretable clusters. Two emerged as mature core themes: PCR-based rapid antimicrobial resistance detection, organized around MRSA, multiplex PCR, and the mecA/mecC and vanA/vanB markers, and a whole-genome sequencing and genomic epidemiology theme spanning multiple pathogen groups. The tuberculosis resistance marker axis formed a strong but specialized mature theme, while the carbapenemase and Gram-negative resistance gene cluster, the metagenomic and nanopore clinical diagnostics cluster, and a general cross-pathogen antimicrobial resistance cluster were identified as emerging or niche research fronts.</p>
<p>Thematic evolution analysis across three time windows documented a clear conceptual restructuring. The early period from 2000 to 2010 centered on target-specific markers such as mecA, vancomycin resistance, and real-time PCR, reflecting an era of single-gene rapid tests. The middle period from 2011 to 2020 brought whole-genome sequencing, tuberculosis, multiplex PCR, and the Enterobacterales-carbapenemase axis to prominence. The recent period from 2021 to 2025 represents a more integrated antimicrobial resistance framework in which WGS, Staphylococcus aureus, and antibiotic resistance concepts dominate, demonstrating the field&#8217;s transition from individual marker detection to genomically integrated, translationally oriented diagnostics.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s methodological rigor included a validation exercise in which 150 randomly selected records were blindly reassessed to test the rule-based text-matching system used to classify pathogens, platforms, markers, and clinical contexts. Concordance rates reached 100% for platform and resistance-marker labels, 91.3% for pathogen labels, and 86.7% for clinical-context labels, yielding an overall average agreement of 94.5%. The analysis also mapped the geography of the field: China led production with 263 publications, followed by the United States with 252, the United Kingdom with 130, and Germany with 127, though the United Kingdom and France showed higher rates of international collaboration and network centrality, revealing a divide between volume-based productivity and collaboration-intensive influence.</p>
<p>The findings carry important implications for clinical practice. Prior evidence shows that rapid diagnostic tests, when deployed alongside antimicrobial stewardship programs, reduce mortality in bloodstream infections compared with blood culture alone. The bibliometric structure documented here confirms that molecular diagnostics has evolved beyond answering whether a pathogen is present, into a multilayered data-generating enterprise that supports resistance prediction, monitoring of clonal spread, and clinical and public health decision-making. At the same time, the study acknowledges limitations: PCR panels and WGS report genetic content rather than physiological state, meaning phenomena such as bacterial persistence and tolerance fall largely outside the field&#8217;s marker-centered vocabulary, and future work integrating phenotypic, genomic, and virulence-layer data will be essential to close the gap between resistance prediction and treatment outcome.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Bibliometric mapping of molecular diagnostic platforms and resistance markers for WHO priority bacterial pathogens</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Molecular Diagnostics for WHO Priority Bacterial Pathogens: A Bibliometric Mapping of Diagnostic Platforms, Resistance Markers, and Antimicrobial Resistance Research Trends</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ünlü, S. (2026). Molecular Diagnostics for WHO Priority Bacterial Pathogens: A Bibliometric Mapping of Diagnostic Platforms, Resistance Markers, and Antimicrobial Resistance Research Trends. <em>MicrobiologyOpen, 15</em>(5), Article e70394. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.70394" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.70394</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.70394" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1002/mbo3.70394</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> antimicrobial resistance, molecular diagnostics, WHO priority pathogens, whole-genome sequencing, PCR, bibliometric analysis, MRSA, carbapenemase genes, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Enterobacterales, CRISPR diagnostics, genomic epidemiology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">200344</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Desiccation promotes DNA damage and rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/desiccation-promotes-dna-damage-and-rifampin-resistance-in-mycobacterium-tuberculosis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gavin Prescott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 06:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aerosol transmission of tuberculosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antibiotic resistance evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial adaptation to dry conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial desiccation tolerance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bacterial stress response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desiccation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desiccation effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desiccation stress in tuberculosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA repair mechanisms in M. tuberculosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug-resistant tuberculosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental stress effects on TB bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic mutations induced by stress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of desiccation on bacterial genomes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of environmental stress on bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial DNA repair mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular basis of antibiotic resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mycobacterium tuberculosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifampin resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rifampin resistance development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[survival strategies of Mycobacterium tuberculosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuberculosis pathogen biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuberculosis transmission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tuberculosis treatment challenges]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/desiccation-promotes-dna-damage-and-rifampin-resistance-in-mycobacterium-tuberculosis/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tuberculosis bacteria exposed to dry conditions suffer significant DNA damage, and the cellular machinery they deploy to repair that damage appears to help strains carrying rifampin-resistance mutations survive transmission, according to a new study published]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tuberculosis bacteria exposed to dry conditions suffer significant DNA damage, and the cellular machinery they deploy to repair that damage appears to help strains carrying rifampin-resistance mutations survive transmission, according to a new study published in Nature Microbiology. The findings offer a possible explanation for one of the most persistent puzzles in tuberculosis biology: how resistance to frontline drugs emerges and spreads in a pathogen whose transmission between people has long remained poorly understood at the molecular level.</p>
<p>Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the bacterium responsible for tuberculosis, is an obligate human pathogen, meaning it cannot complete its life cycle outside of people. Its continued existence as a species therefore depends entirely on its ability to spread from one host to another, which it accomplishes when infected individuals release bacteria-laden aerosol droplets into the air through coughing, speaking, or breathing. Yet despite the obvious centrality of transmission to the pathogen&#8217;s biology, scientists have lacked detailed knowledge of the specific traits that support it. This gap is notable given the scale of the disease: tuberculosis remains one of the deadliest infectious diseases in the world, killing well over a million people each year, and the rise of drug-resistant strains has complicated control efforts in many countries. The new study addresses the transmission gap by focusing on a physical challenge the bacteria inevitably face during spread: desiccation, or drying out, which occurs as aerosol droplets shrink and evaporate in the air.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Christopher D. Brown and Kyu Y. Rhee of Weill Cornell Medicine along with collaborators including Brendon M. Lee, Hannah M. Liu, Amy M. Wu, and structural biologists Seth A. Darst and Elizabeth A. Campbell of The Rockefeller University, designed a laboratory system to mimic this environmental stress. They mounted M. tuberculosis atop a filter platform and exposed the bacteria to varying degrees of humidity, allowing them to model the drying that aerosolized bacteria would experience in the real world. By then rehydrating the samples, the researchers could study not only how the bacteria respond to drying but also how they recover when moisture returns, a scenario that mirrors what happens when droplets are inhaled and reach the warm, moist environment of a new host&#8217;s airways. The approach gave the team a controlled, repeatable way to isolate a single transmission-associated stress, something that is nearly impossible to do in studies of naturally transmitted infections, where the conditions of spread cannot be directly observed.</p>
<p>Using transcriptomic analysis, which measures the activity of thousands of genes simultaneously, and metabolomic profiling, which captures the chemical state of cellular metabolism, the researchers charted the molecular consequences of desiccation and rehydration. The results were striking. Dried bacteria showed elevated levels of oxidative stress, a condition in which reactive molecules damage cellular components. Consistent with that stress, the team detected increased oxidative damage and, critically, an accumulation of double-stranded DNA breaks, among the most dangerous forms of genetic injury a cell can sustain. Double-stranded breaks sever both strands of the DNA helix at once, and if left unrepaired they can be lethal to the cell. In response, the bacteria activated DNA repair programs, indicating that the ability to mend a damaged genome is required for survival through the drying and rehydration cycle.</p>
<p>Among the genes whose expression increased during desiccation was mfd, which encodes a transcription-coupled repair factor. Mfd is a protein that patrols genes as they are being transcribed, flagging DNA damage encountered by the transcription machinery and recruiting repair enzymes to those sites. Because actively transcribed genes are particularly vulnerable to damage, and because unrepaired lesions in transcribed regions can stall the enzymes that read DNA into RNA, transcription-coupled repair provides an efficient first line of defense. Its upregulation under dry conditions suggested that Mfd might play a particularly important role in helping M. tuberculosis cope with the genomic insults of transmission. What the researchers discovered next, however, went beyond simple repair and touched directly on one of the most consequential issues in tuberculosis treatment: antibiotic resistance.</p>
<p>Some mutations in rpoB, the gene encoding a subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase, confer resistance to rifampin, a cornerstone drug of standard tuberculosis therapy. Rifampin is central to the standard multidrug regimen, and resistance to it is a key trigger for classifying a case as multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. These resistance mutations, while advantageous in the presence of the antibiotic, often carry a fitness cost, meaning that bacteria bearing them may grow or survive less well than drug-susceptible counterparts under normal conditions. The team found that mfd expression buffered this fitness cost for specific resistance-conferring rpoB mutations. In other words, the very repair factor induced by the stresses of drying appeared to mask the biological disadvantages that rifampin-resistance mutations would otherwise impose, allowing resistant bacteria to persist more effectively.</p>
<p>To test this idea in a transmission-relevant setting, the researchers silenced mfd during aerosolization of the bacteria. The result was highly specific: strains carrying S450L, the most common rifampin resistance allele found in clinical settings, were disproportionately impaired in their ability to survive the aerosolization process when mfd was absent, while the survival of other strains was less affected. This experiment linked the environmental stress of transmission directly to the differential survival of drug-resistant bacteria, suggesting that the physical journey between hosts is not a neutral event for resistant mutants but a selective filter in which Mfd plays a decisive role.</p>
<p>The epidemiological significance of this laboratory finding was reinforced by an analysis of whole-genome sequences from 51,229 clinically circulating strains of M. tuberculosis. This large-scale survey of real-world bacterial populations provided supporting evidence that the interplay between desiccation responses, DNA repair, and resistance mutations observed in the laboratory is reflected in the patterns of strains actually spreading among patients. Whole-genome sequencing has increasingly been used to track tuberculosis outbreaks and map the spread of resistant lineages, and datasets of this size allow researchers to test whether mechanisms discovered at the bench leave detectable signatures in natural populations. While the study does not establish that desiccation is the sole or even primary driver of rifampin resistance in the clinic, the consistency between the mechanistic experiments and the population-level data strengthens the argument that transmission-associated biology matters for resistance.</p>
<p>Taken together, the studies suggest a provocative reframing of how antibiotic resistance may arise and spread in tuberculosis. Desiccation-induced DNA damage during the generation of aerosol droplets may act as a source of genetic diversification, generating mutations that can, under the right circumstances, potentiate antibiotic resistance. At the same time, the upregulation of Mfd may allow bacteria that have already acquired resistance mutations to survive the rigors of transmission that would otherwise cull them. In this model, the act of spreading between hosts, rather than merely serving as a conduit for pre-existing resistant strains, actively participates in shaping the genetic landscape of the pathogen population. Transmission becomes a bottleneck with evolutionary consequences: only bacteria equipped to withstand drying, and to repair the damage drying causes, pass through it successfully.</p>
<p>The work builds on decades of research into DNA repair systems in bacteria. Mfd-dependent transcription-coupled repair is among the most evolutionarily conserved bacterial repair pathways, and it has been studied primarily in model organisms such as Escherichia coli, where it is known to promote both accurate repair and, in some contexts, mutagenesis. That dual character is relevant here: a repair pathway that generates or tolerates mutation while preserving survival can, under antibiotic pressure, inadvertently favor the emergence of resistant variants. The new findings add an ecological and epidemiological dimension to this basic biology, connecting a housekeeping molecular function to the population dynamics of a global pathogen under a stress condition, drying, that is inseparable from how the pathogen moves through the world.</p>
<p>The implications extend to public health strategy. Rifampin-resistant tuberculosis, including multidrug-resistant forms of the disease, requires longer, more toxic, and more expensive treatment regimens, and the continued emergence of resistance threatens the gains made against the epidemic over recent decades. If the biology of transmission contributes to the survival and spread of resistant strains, then interventions that alter transmission conditions, or approaches that target the DNA damage response itself, could in principle complement existing antibiotic strategies. Such strategies would sit alongside established tools such as rapid molecular diagnostics that detect rifampin resistance, airborne infection control in health facilities, and preventive therapy for exposed contacts. The study&#8217;s authors suggest that transmission-associated desiccation-induced DNA damage should be considered a potential source of genetic diversification that can potentiate antibiotic resistance, a conclusion that reframes transmission as a bottleneck with evolutionary consequences rather than a passive relay.</p>
<p>Several limitations and open questions remain. The laboratory system used filter-mounted bacteria exposed to controlled humidity, which approximates but does not fully reproduce the complex physical environment of a real aerosol droplet traveling between hosts, where factors such as droplet composition, temperature, light exposure, and air currents all vary. The findings concern a defined set of rpoB mutations, with S450L as the focal allele, and the extent to which Mfd buffers the costs of other resistance mutations, or of resistance to drugs other than rifampin, awaits further study. The epidemiological analysis, while large, is correlational in nature and cannot by itself prove causation. Nonetheless, by identifying a concrete molecular mechanism, Mfd-mediated buffering of resistance-mutation costs during a transmission-relevant stress, and by validating it against a large clinical dataset, the study provides a credible framework for future investigations into how the environment between hosts shapes the evolution of one of humanity&#8217;s oldest pathogens.</p>
<p>Future work is likely to explore whether other repair factors contribute to survival during desiccation, whether the DNA damage generated during drying produces specific mutational signatures detectable in circulating strains, and whether pharmacological or environmental interventions could disrupt the desiccation-repair-resistance axis. Answering those questions could help determine whether targeting Mfd or the broader DNA damage response is a realistic avenue for new tuberculosis therapeutics. For now, the study stands as a reminder that the life of a pathogen between its hosts is not a dormant interlude but an active, stressful, and evolutionarily consequential phase of its existence, one that may quietly influence the trajectory of drug resistance worldwide.</p>
<div class="scienmag-article-metadata"><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Biology</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Desiccation promotes DNA damage and rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Brown, C. D., Lee, B. M., Liu, H. M., Wu, A. M., Tellez, A., Zou, H., Singh, P. R., Saito, K., Mishra, S., Brown, M., Saleh, A., Odjourian, N. M., Cristaldo, M., Gan, M., Liu, Q., Gengenbacher, M., Darst, S. A., Campbell, E. A., Nathan, C., &amp; Rhee, K. Y. (2026). Desiccation promotes DNA damage and rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. <em>Nature Microbiology</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-026-02437-w" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-026-02437-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-026-02437-w" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41564-026-02437-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> antibiotic resistance evolution, bacterial adaptation to dry conditions, bacterial desiccation tolerance, desiccation stress in tuberculosis, DNA repair mechanisms in M. tuberculosis, environmental stress effects on TB bacteria, genetic mutations induced by stress, impact of desiccation on bacterial genomes, Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA damage, rifampin resistance development, survival strategies of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, tuberculosis treatment challenges</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">185993</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
