The defining trick of a high entropy alloy lies in its name. Where a conventional alloy is dominated by a single base metal doped with trace additions, an HEA dissolves five or more elements at concentrations of roughly 5 to 35 atomic percent, typically with atomic radii differing by less than 15 percent. The authors note that the field has converged on a second, thermodynamic definition as well: a genuine HEA must possess a configurational entropy of at least 1.5R, where R is the gas constant, meaning the sheer number of possible atomic arrangements is large enough to stabilise simple solid solution phases instead of brittle intermetallic compounds. The result is a material whose structure and properties can be tuned not by tweaking a trace element but by redesigning the entire elemental recipe.

The review organises the field around four so-called core effects, first outlined by Jien-Wei Yeh and completed by S. Ranganathan in 2003. The high entropy effect favours stable, disordered solid solutions; sluggish diffusion slows the rate at which atoms move and phases transform; severe lattice distortion arises because every atom is surrounded by neighbours of different sizes, straining the crystal; and the cocktail effect captures the surprising composite behaviours that emerge when many elements interact at once. Crucially, each of these effects has a direct electromagnetic consequence. Lattice distortion bends electronic energy bands, splits energy levels and creates localised states between the valence and conduction bands, modulating conductivity and dielectric response in ways conventional alloys cannot easily replicate.

That structural disorder translates into an unusually rich toolbox of electromagnetic loss mechanisms. When a microwave strikes an HEA, energy is dissipated through electronic polarisation, as electron clouds shift against their nuclei in the local electric fields created by chemically distinct atoms; through interfacial polarisation, as charges pile up at grain and phase boundaries; through magnetic loss, as magnetic domains in ferromagnetic alloys containing iron, cobalt, nickel or manganese respond and resonate; and through conductive loss, as free electrons oscillate and convert wave energy into heat via Ohmic heating. The challenge, the authors stress, is balance: too much conductivity turns an absorber into a mirror, and a large mismatch between the material’s impedance and that of free space causes most of the wave to reflect away before it can be absorbed.

Impedance matching is therefore the central design problem, and here HEAs offer unusual flexibility. Because complex permittivity and complex permeability can both be adjusted through composition, HEAs can be engineered to bring the material impedance closer to that of ambient space, minimising the reflection coefficient while maximising the attenuation constant that governs how quickly the wave’s amplitude decays inside the absorber. The quantitative payoff is striking. Reported reflection losses for HEA-based materials span from about minus 10 decibels, the threshold below which 90 percent of incident power is absorbed, down to roughly minus 70 decibels, depending on composition, thickness and frequency. The reviewed literature includes an FeCoNiMnCu0.5 alloy with a reflection loss of minus 71.0 decibels at 6.79 gigahertz from a layer just 2.93 millimetres thick, and boron-doped FeCoNiCr alloys reaching minus 62.5 decibels at 2.11 millimetres.

Getting there, however, takes careful processing. Because pure HEAs tend to be strongly metallic and conductive, the review describes several engineering strategies for taming them. Mechanical alloying, particularly high-energy ball milling, flattens spherical particles into high aspect ratio flakes that promote multiple polarisation events and tune the complex electromagnetic parameters. Annealing then sharpens crystallinity and boosts saturation magnetisation: FeCoNiAlCr0.9 powders improved from minus 26.88 to minus 47.55 decibels after heat treatment, while FeCoNiMn0.5Al0.2 annealed at 500 degrees Celsius delivered minus 44.425 decibels over a 3.825 gigahertz bandwidth. Surface modifications do impressive work too. Phosphating FeCoNiMn flakes produced a protective layer that lifted performance to minus 62.4 decibels at 10.7 gigahertz while adding corrosion and oxidation resistance, and dealloying, which leaches aluminium out of FeCoNiCuAl surfaces, enhanced impedance matching and pushed losses past minus 56 decibels at two separate frequencies.

Doping and compositing broaden the palette further. Adding small amounts of non-metals such as carbon, nitrogen or boron introduces ionic character and dipole oscillations that feed dielectric loss; boron-doped FeCoNiCr alloys achieved a maximum bandwidth of 5.78 gigahertz while retaining mechanical strength and oxidation resistance. Encapsulating HEA nanoparticles in graphitic carbon shells, via routes from arc discharge in methane to metal-organic chemical vapour deposition, simultaneously improves impedance matching and reduces radar cross-section, with one carbon-coated FeCoNiCuMn composite reaching minus 65.8 decibels and an absorption width of 7.68 gigahertz. Pairing HEAs with polymers, oxides or ceramics blends the alloy’s magnetic loss and structural stability with the partner phase’s dielectric loss, as in FeNiCrMn-polylactic acid composites printable by fused deposition modelling, and FeCoNi(Si0.6Al0.2B0.2) powders embedded in paraffin, which the review singles out as among the most versatile performers, combining thin 1.2 to 2.0 millimetre layers with reflection losses down to minus 44.1 decibels in the X and Ku bands.

Measuring all this in a way that matters outside the laboratory is its own discipline, and the review devotes detailed attention to it. Vector network analysers paired with horn antennas measure scattering parameters such as S11 and S21 in free-space fixtures, from which shielding effectiveness and reflection loss are derived; HEA-reinforced carbon fibre composites tested this way achieved total shielding of about 45.9 decibels at 4 gigahertz. Open area test sites, with calibrated ground planes and antennas separated by 3 to 30 metres, serve compliance testing of large enclosures, while indoor anechoic chambers lined with pyramidal absorbers provide reflection-free environments for monostatic and bistatic radar cross-section measurements across controlled angles, polarisations and frequency sweeps. The review reports HEA composite radar cross-section reductions of roughly 10 to 30 decibels in chamber tests, and notes that such measurements bridge laboratory-grade shielding data and real-world electromagnetic detectability.

Obstacles remain before these alloys fly on actual aircraft. The authors highlight the absence of standardised testing protocols across frequency bands and environments, which makes comparing studies difficult; edge effects and sample size limits that hamper scaling VNA results to full components; interfacial stability and oxidation concerns when HEAs are coupled with polymers; and early-stage cost and manufacturability. Even the frequency coverage is lopsided: most HEA research targets the C and X bands central to military radar and communications, leaving S-band and Ku-band coverage comparatively underexplored. The review calls for quantitative assessment of absorption mechanisms, a firmer physical understanding of lattice distortion, scalable synthesis, multi-scale modelling and durability testing under extreme conditions as the priorities that will determine whether laboratory spectacles become fielded technologies.

The most transformative possibility, the authors argue, lies in merging HEA chemistry with additive manufacturing. Because 3D printing can control composition, microstructure and geometry simultaneously, it promises lightweight graded structures whose electromagnetic response is designed in from the melt, capable of surviving high temperatures and corrosive atmospheres while retaining their absorption performance. From stealth platforms and radar-visible UAV signatures to telecommunications, energy storage and even healthcare electronics, the combination of chaotic multielement chemistry and precision manufacturing offers something conventional absorbers cannot: a single material family whose dielectric and magnetic personalities can be tuned almost at will. If the remaining manufacturing and standardisation hurdles fall, the alloys once prized mainly for their strength and heat resistance may quietly become the invisible backbone of an electromagnetically cleaner, harder-to-detect world.

Subject of Research: High entropy alloys as electromagnetic wave absorbing materials for stealth and shielding applications

Article Title: A review on high entropy alloys as an absorber of electromagnetic radiation

Article References: Gowda, N. R., Setupathy, A., Raj, A. A. B., & Thangaraju, S. (2026). A review on high entropy alloys as an absorber of electromagnetic radiation. Journal of Materials Science: Metallurgy, 1(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44492-026-00006-0

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: 10.1007/s44492-026-00006-0

Keywords: high entropy alloys, electromagnetic wave absorption, stealth technology, radar cross section, impedance matching, magnetic loss, dielectric loss, radar absorbing materials, electromagnetic interference shielding, mechanical alloying, additive manufacturing, lattice distortion