<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MSIPep &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/msipep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 05:36:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>MSIPep prioritizes tumor peptides in leukemia and solid-tumor datasets</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/msipep-prioritizes-tumor-peptides-in-leukemia-and-solid-tumor-datasets/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathaniel Bowman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 05:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[acute myeloid leukemia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer immunotherapy research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer peptides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[de novo peptide sequencing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deep learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HLA-bound peptide profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immunogenic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immunogenicity prediction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immunopeptidomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immunopeptidomics in leukemia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[improving immunopeptidomics accuracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass spectrometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSIPep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MSIPep workflow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neoantigens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-source computational pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peptide discovery in ovarian and breast cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipeline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid tumor peptide prioritization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solid tumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-cell receptors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[T-cell response elicitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcriptomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tumor peptide identification]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=327221</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[MSIPep combines immunopeptidomics, transcriptomics and deep learning to identify and computationally prioritize candidate tumor peptides in leukemia and solid-tumor datasets.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Researchers have developed and evaluated MSIPep, an open-source computational pipeline that combines immunopeptidomics, transcriptomics and deep learning to identify and prioritize candidate tumor peptides with predicted potential to elicit T-cell responses. Tests in acute myeloid leukemia datasets showed an improved ability to discover peptides with high predicted immunogenic potential, while separate analyses of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and triple-negative breast cancer datasets demonstrated the pipeline’s applicability to solid tumors.</p>
<p>Immunopeptidomics directly profiles peptides bound to human leukocyte antigens, or HLA molecules, capturing the antigen repertoire displayed on tumor-cell surfaces. The study’s authors identify several constraints in existing immunopeptidomics-based approaches to immunogenic peptide discovery: heavy reliance on sequence databases, dependence on matched normal controls and a lack of dedicated modules for predicting T-cell recognition. These limitations can restrict de novo peptide discovery, clinical applicability and the accuracy of immunogenicity prioritization, according to the research.</p>
<p>MSIPep is designed to address these gaps through an integrated analysis workflow. It combines database-based peptide searching with de novo sequencing strategies and supports both data-dependent acquisition, or DDA, and data-independent acquisition, or DIA, modes. The pipeline also applies false-discovery-rate control at multiple levels to improve the robustness of its results. Its source code is publicly available through a GitHub repository, and the developers provide a Docker container intended to support reproducible and scalable deployment.</p>
<p>For the prioritization stage, MSIPep incorporates ProTCR, an in-house deep-learning model developed to evaluate interactions between peptides and T-cell receptors. Rather than ranking candidates only by whether an HLA-bound peptide has been identified, the model provides a computational estimate of a peptide’s T-cell response potential. The combined framework therefore links identification of tumor-associated peptides with a receptor-interaction model intended to distinguish candidates with higher predicted immunogenicity, although that ranking remains a model-based estimate rather than a direct measurement of patient immune responses.</p>
<p>The evaluation used cancer datasets rather than a clinical trial. Acute myeloid leukemia applications highlighted MSIPep’s reported improvement in finding peptides with high predicted immunogenic potential, and analyses involving high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma and triple-negative breast cancer showed that the workflow could also be applied to solid-tumor data. These results position MSIPep as a reusable computational framework for narrowing large peptide-candidate spaces, but the supplied findings do not establish that prioritized peptides induce immune responses in people, validate them as cancer-vaccine targets or produce clinical benefit. The reported advance is therefore in the identification and computational prioritization of candidate immunogenic peptides across leukemia and solid-tumor datasets.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Computational identification and prioritization of immunogenic tumor peptides</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> MSIPep: A pipeline for immunogenic peptide identification and prioritization integrating immunopeptidomics and transcriptomics data</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Liu, P., Zhang, S., Lu, M., Xu, M., Liu, Z., Chen, L., Xu, P., Tan, X., &amp; Xie, L. (2026). MSIPep: A pipeline for immunogenic peptide identification and prioritization integrating immunopeptidomics and transcriptomics data. <em>BMC Genomics</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-026-13481-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-026-13481-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-026-13481-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s12864-026-13481-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> MSIPep, immunopeptidomics, transcriptomics, cancer peptides, neoantigens, T-cell receptors, deep learning, mass spectrometry, acute myeloid leukemia, solid tumors, pipeline, immunogenic</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">327221</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
