<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mouse embryonic stem cells &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/mouse-embryonic-stem-cells/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 20:31:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Two Ways to Read a Cell&#8217;s Master Switches Reveal Hidden Biases in Gene Regulation Studies</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/two-ways-to-read-a-cells-master-switches-reveal-hidden-biases-in-gene-regulation-studies/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 20:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATAC-seq]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATAC-seq analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biases in gene regulation studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cell identity and development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chromatin Accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chromatin accessibility tools like chromVAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chromVAR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computational inference of gene regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disease progression and gene regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gene regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genome-wide chromatin mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mouse embryonic stem cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nucleosome displacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pioneer factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[POU5F1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primeTF reporter assay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[signal-responsive TFs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOX2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[STAT3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Systematic comparison of gene regulation methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transcription factor activity measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transcription factors]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=186691</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A systematic comparison shows that ATAC-seq and multiplexed reporter assays capture distinct, complementary aspects of transcription factor activity, with each method biased toward different regulatory modes.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Transcription factors are the master regulators of the genome, the proteins that decide which genes are switched on, which are silenced, and ultimately what a cell becomes. Because they govern cell identity, development, and the progression of many diseases, researchers have long sought reliable ways to measure their activity. A new study published in Molecular Systems Biology by Max Trauernicht, Vinícius H. Franceschini-Santos, Hatice Yücel, Teodora Filipovska, and Bas van Steensel of the Netherlands Cancer Institute now delivers one of the most systematic head-to-head comparisons to date of the two dominant approaches for gauging transcription factor activity, and the results carry important implications for how thousands of published and future gene regulation studies should be interpreted.</p>
<p>The first approach, which has become a workhorse of modern genomics, infers transcription factor activity computationally from ATAC-seq data. ATAC-seq maps regions of open, accessible chromatin across the genome, and the logic behind the inference is elegant: many transcription factors bind DNA and displace nucleosomes, prying open the chromatin around their binding sites. By scoring the genome-wide correlation between a factor&#8217;s binding motif and the presence of accessible chromatin, tools such as chromVAR can assign an activity score to every transcription factor in a single experiment. The method is simple, requires little input material, works even on single cells, and has been applied across fields ranging from neuroscience to cancer biology to reconstruct gene regulatory networks and dissect cis-regulatory logic.</p>
<p>But the approach is fundamentally indirect. ATAC-seq captures a factor&#8217;s ability to bind DNA and remodel chromatin, not necessarily its transcriptional output. This introduces systematic biases. Pioneer factors, which can invade closed chromatin and open it up, leave strong accessibility signatures that ATAC-seq readily detects. Factors that require pre-existing open chromatin, or that bind regions opened by other proteins, may be underrepresented or falsely flagged as active simply because they occupy constitutively accessible housekeeping promoters. The central question motivating the new work was blunt: what does ATAC-seq actually measure about transcription factor function?</p>
<p>To answer it, the team turned to a direct alternative they had previously developed: the prime TF reporter system, a multiplexed assay in which a library of one hundred barcoded synthetic reporters, each designed to probe the regulatory activity of a single transcription factor, is transfected into cells. Transcription from each reporter is quantified by sequencing the barcodes in messenger RNA, and a computational pipeline called primetime converts barcode counts into differential activity scores. Because the reporters were engineered with optimized motif spacing and flanking sequences to minimize crosstalk, some can even distinguish between closely related family members, a feat that motif-based analysis of genomic ATAC-seq data often cannot achieve.</p>
<p>The experimental design was deliberately rigorous. The researchers transfected the reporter library into mouse embryonic stem cells and then applied nine distinct perturbations known to alter specific transcription factor activities: degradation of the core pluripotency pioneers SOX2 and POU5F1 using degron-tagged cell lines, knockdown of TFCP2L1, overexpression of FOXA1, withdrawal of LIF to dampen STAT3 signaling, depletion of the WNT pathway activator Chiron to reduce TCF7 activity, and stimulation of SRF, CREB1, and HSF1 through serum exposure, forskolin treatment, and heat shock respectively. Crucially, both assays were performed in the same cellular background after transfection, and the same binding motifs were used for the ATAC-seq analysis as those embedded in the reporters, enabling a genuinely direct comparison. Quality controls confirmed the robustness of both readouts, with replicate correlations for chromVAR deviation scores reaching 0.92 to 0.97 and strong agreement with previously published SOX2 degradation data.</p>
<p>The headline finding was a striking asymmetry. The primeTF reporter assay detected significant, directionally correct activity changes for all nine perturbed factors, with fold-changes ranging from 2.6-fold for SRF upon serum stimulation to a dramatic 63-fold for HSF1 upon heat shock. ATAC-seq, analyzed with chromVAR, captured seven of the nine, but completely missed the activation of SRF by serum and CREB1 by forskolin. When all one hundred factors were ranked by their perturbation response, both methods placed the correct target at or near the top in six conditions, but under heat shock, forskolin, and serum stimulation, ATAC-seq ranked the expected targets only fourth, fourteenth, and eighty-fifth respectively. Repeating the analysis with TOBIAS, an independent footprinting-based method, produced the same overall trends, demonstrating that the discrepancies reflect intrinsic limitations of accessibility-based inference rather than the quirks of any single algorithm.</p>
<p>The pattern that emerged was mechanistically coherent. Signal-responsive transcription factors such as CREB1, STAT3, HSF1, SRF, EGR1, NFKB1, and TP53, whose activities are typically controlled by post-translational modifications like phosphorylation rather than by changes in protein abundance or chromatin remodeling, were far more sensitively detected by the reporters. These factors often bind chromatin that is already accessible, so their activation leaves little or no footprint in accessibility data. Conversely, ATAC-seq preferentially captured chromatin-modifying and pioneer factors. Degradation of SOX2 and POU5F1 produced pronounced accessibility changes that chromVAR detected robustly, and ATAC-seq additionally revealed biologically meaningful secondary responses, such as reduced TCF7L2 and increased TEAD1 accessibility after SOX2 loss, consistent with SOX2&#8217;s known roles in promoting WNT signaling and antagonizing the Hippo pathway. Upon LIF withdrawal, ATAC-seq captured reduced accessibility of the pluripotency effectors TFCP2L1, KLF4, and ESRRB downstream of STAT3, changes the reporters did not register.</p>
<p>Time added a further dimension to the story. In a time-course following LIF withdrawal, ATAC-seq detected a measurable decrease in accessibility around STAT3 binding sites within one hour, reaching maximum downregulation by three hours, while the reporter assay showed no change at one hour, a delayed response at three hours, and a progressive decline through twenty-four hours. ATAC-seq therefore provides a near-instantaneous snapshot of chromatin state, whereas the reporters yield a time-integrated readout shaped by both transcriptional induction and mRNA degradation. Yet temporal resolution alone could not explain the sensitivity gap: at both six and twenty-four hours, primeTF identified STAT3 as the single most significantly downregulated factor with a large effect size, while ATAC-seq reported comparable effect sizes for several other factors without clearly prioritizing STAT3.</p>
<p>To test the methods in a less controlled but biologically richer setting, the team differentiated mouse embryonic stem cells into neural precursor cells and profiled both cell types with both assays. The two methods correlated moderately, and primeTF correctly identified the downregulation of all key pluripotency factors upon differentiation, whereas ATAC-seq missed STAT3 and POU5F1. The clearest divergence involved NFIA, a factor central to neural and glial differentiation: ATAC-seq detected a massive increase in NFIA-associated accessibility, consistent with pioneer activity and extensive chromatin remodeling, while the reporter registered only a modest two-fold activation, suggesting NFIA remodels chromatin powerfully but acts as a weak transcriptional activator in isolation. In additional perturbations of the differentiated cells, ATAC-seq also struggled to distinguish CREB1 from the related bZIP factors FOS::JUN and NFE2L2, whose motifs are highly similar, whereas the optimized reporters resolved these cases specifically and correctly identified NR4A1, a well-established CREB1 target.</p>
<p>The authors are careful to note the limitations of their benchmark. The perturbations were deliberately chosen to target factors with previously validated reporters, making the comparison somewhat favorable to primeTF, and the reporter system is designed to measure transcriptional activation rather than repression, while ATAC-seq alone cannot discriminate activating from repressive effects. Both approaches also require orthogonal follow-up experiments to deconvolve cases where multiple factors bind the same motif. Nevertheless, the overarching conclusion is clear and actionable: the two methods offer distinct and complementary perspectives on transcription factor function. ATAC-seq excels at identifying factors that reshape chromatin, especially pioneer factors, while reporter assays reveal the transcriptional potency of factors, particularly those activated through signaling pathways. For researchers seeking a comprehensive picture of gene regulation, neither assay alone suffices, and integrating both is emerging as the standard that rigorous studies of transcriptional control should aspire to meet.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s findings arrive at a moment when accessibility-based inference has become near-ubiquitous in the literature, often without explicit validation against orthogonal measurements. Because ATAC-seq profiles can be generated from tiny amounts of material and even single cells, activity scores derived from them are frequently reported as ground truth, yet the new comparison shows that such scores are best understood as measures of chromatin engagement rather than of transcriptional drive. This distinction matters particularly for interpreting signaling pathways, where factors like CREB1 and HSF1 are activated by phosphorylation and trimerization respectively, leaving protein abundance untouched and chromatin largely unremodeled.</p>
<p>The work also builds on a longer arc of reporter technology development. Early massively parallel reporter assays demonstrated that hundreds of regulatory sequences could be assayed simultaneously using barcodes and sequencing, but applying this logic to transcription factors themselves required carefully engineered synthetic elements that isolate each factor&#8217;s contribution from the combinatorial context of endogenous enhancers. The prime reporter library represents that refinement, and its ability to resolve closely related family members addresses a persistent weakness of motif-based analyses, where similar DNA-binding specificities confound attribution.</p>
<p>For the field, the practical message is one of calibration rather than replacement. Accessibility data remain invaluable for mapping pioneer activity and secondary network effects, while reporters quantify transcriptional potency directly. Studies that rely on a single method should now acknowledge its blind spots explicitly, and combined designs are likely to become the benchmark for claims about transcription factor function.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Systematic comparison of transcription factor activity measurements by ATAC-seq chromatin accessibility inference and multiplexed prime TF reporter assays in mouse stem cells</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Systematic comparison of estimates of transcription factor activity by ATAC-seq and multiplexed reporter assays</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Trauernicht, M., Franceschini-Santos, V. H., Yücel, H., Filipovska, T., &amp; van Steensel, B. (2026). Systematic comparison of estimates of transcription factor activity by ATAC-seq and multiplexed reporter assays. <em>Molecular Systems Biology</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44320-026-00240-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s44320-026-00240-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44320-026-00240-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s44320-026-00240-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> transcription factors, ATAC-seq, chromVAR, primeTF reporter assay, chromatin accessibility, gene regulation, pioneer factors, SOX2, POU5F1, STAT3, mouse embryonic stem cells, signal-responsive TFs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">186691</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hmgn3 Essential for Triggering Totipotency in Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/hmgn3-essential-for-triggering-totipotency-in-mouse-embryonic-stem-cells/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 16:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular potency enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developmental biology breakthroughs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embryogenesis research advancements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embryonic and extraembryonic lineages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extraembryonic tissue development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hmgn3 gene function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in vitro totipotency induction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mouse embryonic stem cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pluripotency versus totipotency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stem cell differentiation potential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synthetic embryology implications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[totipotency in stem cells]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/hmgn3-essential-for-triggering-totipotency-in-mouse-embryonic-stem-cells/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the rapidly evolving field of developmental biology, mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) have served as indispensable tools, primarily due to their abilities to proliferate indefinitely and differentiate into multiple cell types—a property known as pluripotency. However, despite these remarkable features, ESCs are limited in their potential to generate extraembryonic tissues such as the placenta [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the rapidly evolving field of developmental biology, mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) have served as indispensable tools, primarily due to their abilities to proliferate indefinitely and differentiate into multiple cell types—a property known as pluripotency. However, despite these remarkable features, ESCs are limited in their potential to generate extraembryonic tissues such as the placenta and yolk sac, critical components that support embryonic development in vivo. This limitation has spurred intensive research aimed at pushing the boundaries of cellular potency toward totipotency—the highest developmental potential a cell can possess—which encompasses the ability to form both embryonic and extraembryonic lineages. Recent groundbreaking work has shed light on the pivotal role of the gene Hmgn3 in bestowing mouse ESCs with totipotency-like characteristics, thereby opening new avenues for studies in early embryogenesis and synthetic embryology.</p>
<p>Totipotency, a rare and transient state during the earliest stages of embryonic development, is characterized by the capacity to develop into all cell types that constitute the organism as well as the supportive extraembryonic structures necessary for survival and growth. This state is distinct from pluripotency, which allows cells to give rise to all embryonic tissues but excludes extraembryonic derivatives. Achieving stable totipotency or totipotent-like states in vitro has proven challenging, yet vital for advancing regenerative medicine, understanding developmental biology, and engineering artificial embryos with full developmental potential. Previous strategies to induce totipotent-like states have predominantly centered around optimizing culture conditions, but the molecular mechanisms governing this process remain inadequately understood.</p>
<p>In a recent pivotal study, Wang and colleagues successfully engineered a mouse embryonic stem cell line with forced overexpression of the gene Hmgn3 (Hmgn3-OE ESCs). This line exhibited enhanced plasticity and developmental versatility compared to its wild-type counterparts. Importantly, these modified ESCs, when incorporated into developing embryos in chimera assays, demonstrated stable and robust contributions not only to fetal tissues but also to essential extraembryonic structures including the placenta and yolk sac. This finding represents a significant leap in stem cell biology, underscoring the capacity of a single gene, Hmgn3, to activate a totipotency-like program in ESCs.</p>
<p>To further characterize the totipotent features of Hmgn3-overexpressing ESCs, the researchers explored their behavior in vitro by inducing the formation of blastoid-like structures, or blastoids. These three-dimensional structures recapitulate critical aspects of natural blastocyst architecture and function. Notably, Hmgn3-OE ESCs self-organized into blastoids that closely resembled wild-type blastocysts at the cellular and molecular levels. The blastoids exhibited appropriate lineage segregation and expression profiles akin to genuine embryos, thereby validating the totipotency and developmental competence of the engineered ESCs. Such artificial embryo models provide a powerful platform for dissecting early developmental events and evaluating gene function under controlled conditions.</p>
<p>One of the most compelling discoveries of this study lies in the elucidation of the downstream regulatory network orchestrated by Hmgn3. The team identified the gene Dux, known as a key driver of totipotency-associated gene expression, as a critical mediator of Hmgn3&#8217;s effect. Loss-of-function experiments revealed that knockout of Dux substantially diminished the enhanced totipotency phenotype of Hmgn3-OE ESCs, highlighting the gene’s indispensable role in the molecular cascade activated by Hmgn3. This interplay between Hmgn3 and Dux underscores a tightly regulated genetic axis that governs the acquisition and maintenance of totipotent states.</p>
<p>From a mechanistic standpoint, Hmgn3 likely functions as an important epigenetic modulator influencing chromatin architecture and transcriptional accessibility. Its overexpression could facilitate the opening of chromatin domains associated with totipotency-related genes, thereby enabling ESCs to activate gene expression programs typical of totipotent cells. This chromatin remodeling potentially underpins the observed phenotypic plasticity and enhanced developmental potential. Understanding these epigenetic modifications offers profound insights into the control of cell fate decisions and regulatory networks in early embryogenesis.</p>
<p>Moreover, this research provides compelling evidence supporting the feasibility of reconstructing embryonic development programs using engineered stem cells. The ability of Hmgn3-OE ESCs to form both fetal and extraembryonic structures highlights their potential utility in modeling complex developmental processes in vitro, surpassing the capabilities of conventional ESCs. Such models may pave the way for novel experimental approaches to study genetic diseases, embryonic patterning, and lineage specification without the ethical concerns associated with using actual human embryos.</p>
<p>Importantly, the implications of activating totipotency in stem cells extend beyond fundamental biology into practical biomedical applications. Totipotent-like stem cells could revolutionize regenerative medicine by offering comprehensive tools for tissue engineering, disease modeling, and cell-based therapies that require the generation of diverse cell types and supportive tissues. Additionally, these advances could expedite the development of synthetic embryos as testing platforms for drug discovery and toxicology.</p>
<p>Looking forward, further research is needed to explore the precise molecular mechanisms by which Hmgn3 modulates chromatin and transcription, as well as the interplay with other critical factors in the regulation of totipotency. Additionally, expanding these findings to human stem cells could have transformative impacts on developmental biology and regenerative therapies. The integration of genome editing technologies with the insights from this study may provide unprecedented control over stem cell potency and developmental trajectories.</p>
<p>In summary, the pioneering work by Wang et al. marks a paradigm shift in stem cell biology, demonstrating that a single gene, Hmgn3, can significantly elevate the developmental capacity of mouse embryonic stem cells to a totipotent-like state. By delineating the molecular circuit involving Hmgn3 and its downstream effector Dux, this research lays a robust foundation for engineering artificial embryo models and advancing our understanding of the earliest stages of life. The ability to reliably generate totipotent-like cells in vitro heralds a new era in developmental and regenerative medicine, with implications that are as profound as they are promising.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research</strong>: Induction of totipotency in mouse embryonic stem cells via Hmgn3 overexpression</p>
<p><strong>Article Title</strong>: Hmgn3 is critical for inducing totipotency in mouse embryonic stem cells</p>
<p><strong>Web References</strong>:<br />
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2025.10.025">DOI: 10.1016/j.scib.2025.10.025</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits</strong>: ©Science China Press</p>
<p><strong>Keywords</strong>: totipotency, embryonic stem cells, Hmgn3, Dux, blastoid, extraembryonic tissues, developmental biology, chromatin remodeling, artificial embryo models, mouse ESCs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">104601</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
