<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>moss &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/moss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 22:35:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Soil Crust Degradation May Amplify Climate Warming, Experiment Shows</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/soil-crust-degradation-may-amplify-climate-warming-experiment-shows/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 22:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[albedo feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biocrust community composition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological soil crust degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological soil crusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon cycle feedback mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change impact on drylands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate model inclusion of biocrusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate warming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate warming feedback]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyanobacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dryland ecosystem health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dryland soil biodiversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drylands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dust emission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth system feedbacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lichen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrogen fixation in drylands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil carbon cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil stabilization by biocrusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water infiltration regulation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=199300</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New experimental evidence shows that climate warming degrades biological soil crusts in drylands, triggering feedbacks through albedo change, dust emission and carbon loss that can amplify warming further.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across the world&#8217;s drylands, the ground often looks barren at first glance. Yet between the scattered plants, the soil surface is frequently covered by a thin, living skin known as a biological soil crust, or biocrust. This community of cyanobacteria, lichens, mosses, algae and fungi binds soil particles together, stabilizes the surface, regulates water infiltration and participates in the cycling of carbon and nitrogen. A new study published in Communications Earth &amp; Environment reports experimental evidence that the degradation of these crusts under climate warming can itself feed back into the climate system, creating an amplification loop in which warming damages biocrusts and the resulting damage further accelerates warming. The finding, if it holds across dryland regions, adds a previously underappreciated component to the family of carbon-cycle feedbacks that climate models must account for.</p>
<p>Biological soil crusts occupy an enormous area. Researchers estimate that they cover a substantial fraction of the land surface in arid and semi-arid regions worldwide, making them one of the most extensive living surfaces on Earth. In many drylands, vascular plant cover is sparse, and biocrusts perform much of the ecological work that vegetation performs elsewhere. They fix atmospheric nitrogen, contribute to soil organic carbon, reduce dust emission by binding loose particles, and alter the albedo, or reflectivity, of the land surface. Because of these multiple roles, any widespread decline in biocrust integrity has consequences that ripple through soil stability, air quality, hydrology and biogeochemistry simultaneously.</p>
<p>The central concern addressed by the new research is that climate warming may push biocrust communities past physiological limits. Mosses and lichens that dominate mature biocrusts in cooler drylands are particularly sensitive to heat and drying. Laboratory and field studies over the past decade have shown that elevated temperatures can reduce photosynthesis, damage chlorophyll, and shift community composition toward simpler cyanobacteria-dominated crusts or, in extreme cases, toward bare ground. Earlier work by some of the same research community suggested that under high-emissions scenarios, large portions of the global biocrust-covered area could become climatically unsuitable by the end of the century. What remained uncertain was whether such degradation would measurably feed back into the climate system, and through which pathways.</p>
<p>The study tackles this question with an experimental design intended to move beyond correlation. Rather than simply observing that warmer sites have poorer crusts, the researchers manipulated conditions to isolate the causal chain: warming degrades crusts, and degraded crusts alter surface properties in ways that reinforce warming. By comparing intact and degraded crust states under controlled and field conditions, the team quantified how the loss of biocrust cover changes the exchange of energy, water and carbon between the land surface and the atmosphere. The results indicate that degradation is not a passive consequence of warming but an active participant in it, converting a biological response into a physical amplification mechanism.</p>
<p>One of the key pathways identified involves surface reflectivity. Intact biocrusts, particularly those with light-colored lichens and cyanobacterial sheaths, can raise the albedo of dryland soils relative to bare ground. When crusts degrade, the exposed soil is often darker, absorbing more solar radiation and warming the surface further. This darkening effect is conceptually similar to the sea-ice albedo feedback, in which melting ice exposes darker ocean water that absorbs more heat. In drylands, the magnitude per unit area is smaller, but the sheer extent of biocrust-covered terrain means that even modest albedo shifts could translate into meaningful regional energy-balance changes.</p>
<p>A second pathway runs through dust. Biocrusts act as a biological armor that suppresses the emission of mineral dust from dryland surfaces. When crusts are disturbed or killed, the soil becomes vulnerable to wind erosion, and dust loads in the atmosphere increase. Atmospheric dust interacts with radiation in complex ways, scattering and absorbing sunlight and altering cloud formation, but increased dust deposition on distant ice and snow surfaces darkens them and accelerates melt. Dust also settles on biocrusts themselves, burying living organisms and further degrading the crust, a self-reinforcing loop within the larger feedback. The study&#8217;s experimental evidence links crust loss to enhanced dust emission, closing an important part of this chain.</p>
<p>The third and perhaps most direct pathway involves carbon. Biocrusts take up carbon dioxide through photosynthesis and respire it back, but over their lifespan they contribute net carbon to dryland soils. Degradation reverses this balance: photosynthetic uptake declines while decomposition and respiration of accumulated organic matter can release stored carbon back to the atmosphere. In a warming world, this shift means that a land surface that once functioned as a modest carbon sink can flip toward being a carbon source. The researchers&#8217; measurements capture this transition, showing that degraded crusts exhibit reduced carbon fixation and altered respiration dynamics consistent with a loss of the crust&#8217;s carbon sequestration function.</p>
<p>Taken together, these three mechanisms, albedo change, dust emission and carbon exchange, form the basis of what the authors describe as a degradation-warming amplification feedback. Warming degrades the crust; the degraded surface absorbs more heat, emits more dust and releases more carbon; and each of these changes contributes to further warming, both locally and potentially at the global scale. The experimental nature of the evidence is what distinguishes this work from earlier modeling studies. By demonstrating each link in the chain under controlled manipulation, the study provides a stronger causal foundation for including biocrust dynamics in Earth system models, which have historically represented dryland surfaces in a highly simplified manner.</p>
<p>The implications for climate projection are considerable. Drylands are expanding under warming, and the populations that depend on them for grazing and agriculture are among the most vulnerable on Earth. If biocrust degradation amplifies regional warming, then projections for these regions may be conservative, underestimating the pace of change. Moreover, because biocrusts recover slowly, often requiring decades to rebuild after severe disturbance, the feedback may be difficult to reverse once triggered. Land management practices that protect crusts, such as limiting livestock trampling, restricting off-road vehicle use and restoring vegetation cover, could therefore serve not only as conservation measures but as climate mitigation strategies with measurable regional benefits.</p>
<p>The study also underscores a broader lesson about the climate system: feedbacks can arise from the smallest and least conspicuous components of the biosphere. Biological soil crusts are millimeters thick and easily destroyed by a single footprint, yet they mediate exchanges of energy, water, dust and carbon across vast areas. As climate change intensifies, understanding and protecting these fragile surfaces may prove essential not only for the health of dryland ecosystems but for the trajectory of the climate itself. The experimental evidence presented here marks an important step toward that understanding, and it is likely to stimulate further research into how other overlooked living surfaces, from desert pavements to cryptogamic covers on rocks and trees, modulate the planet&#8217;s response to warming.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Experimental evidence that biological soil crust degradation under climate warming creates an amplifying climate feedback in drylands</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Experimental evidence of a biological soil crust degradation climate warming amplification feedback</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Smith, W. K., Villarreal, M. L., Lauria, C., Rutherford, W. A., Herrmann, S., Scholl, V., Howell, A., Javadian, M., Ji, F., Zhang, F., Burgess, M. A., Kokaly, R., Poulter, B., &amp; Reed, S. C. (2026). Experimental evidence of a biological soil crust degradation climate warming amplification feedback. <em>Communications Earth &amp;amp; Environment</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03874-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03874-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-026-03874-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s43247-026-03874-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> biological soil crusts, climate warming, drylands, albedo feedback, dust emission, carbon cycle, soil degradation, Earth system feedbacks, cyanobacteria, lichen, moss, climate modeling</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">199300</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tiny Desert Crusts Hold Winter Snow — and Carbon — in Place</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/tiny-desert-crusts-hold-winter-snow-and-carbon-in-place/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Morrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 22:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biocrusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogeochemical processes in cold deserts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological soil crusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon and nitrogen fixation in deserts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold desert ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cold deserts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drylands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystem ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecosystem resilience in harsh environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of snow on soil microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term field studies on biocrusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial activity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial activity in winter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moss-dominated biocrusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Geoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of lichens and cyanobacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snow retention in deserts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snowpack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil biogeochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil insulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil stabilization by biocrusts]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=199136</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A long-term field study shows moss-dominated biocrusts retain winter snowpack in cold deserts, sustaining soil biogeochemistry and microbial carbon cycling through the harshest months.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across the cold deserts of the world, the ground between scattered plants is rarely bare. It is covered by a thin, living skin of mosses, lichens, cyanobacteria and fungi known as a biological soil crust, or biocrust. These inconspicuous communities, often only a few millimeters thick, have long been studied for their ability to stabilize soils, fix atmospheric carbon and nitrogen, and withstand some of the harshest conditions on Earth. A new long-term field study, published in Nature Geoscience and highlighted in a commentary by soil ecologist Angela Lafuente, reveals an unexpected and consequential role for these crusts: in cold desert environments, moss-dominated biocrusts substantially enhance the retention of snow, and in doing so sustain the biogeochemical machinery of the soil through the most challenging season of the year.</p>
<p>The finding matters because winter is not the dormant period it is often assumed to be. Beneath a blanket of snow, soils remain biologically active. Snow acts as an insulating layer, decoupling soil temperatures from frigid air temperatures and preventing the ground from freezing to depths that would kill or immobilize microbial communities. When snow lingers, microbes continue to decompose organic matter, respire carbon dioxide and transform nitrogen compounds at measurable rates throughout the cold season. In temperate and boreal forests, this winter-under-snow activity has been shown in earlier research to contribute a substantial fraction of annual carbon losses from soils. What the new study adds is evidence that in dryland systems — where snow is intermittent, thin and vulnerable — the presence or absence of a living soil surface can determine whether that insulating blanket persists at all.</p>
<p>The research, led by Yuqing Cao, Bowker, Zhao, Chamizo, Delgado-Baquerizo and colleagues under the title &#8216;Moss biocrusts sustain snowpack and soil function in cold deserts&#8217;, draws on long-term field monitoring of how moss-dominated biocrust cover influences both the duration and the depth of snow cover. The authors document that surfaces clothed in moss biocrusts hold snow longer and maintain deeper snowpack than adjacent uncrusted ground. The mechanism is partly physical. Moss biocrusts create a rough, porous microtopography at the soil surface, with elevated tufts and hollows that trap drifting snow and reduce wind-driven sublimation and redistribution. In open cold deserts, where wind is a dominant agent of snow loss, this roughness effect can make the difference between a snowpack that survives weeks of winter and one that vanishes within days.</p>
<p>There is also a thermal dimension. By retaining snow, biocrusted surfaces maintain a more stable and generally milder soil temperature regime through winter. The snow layer itself acts as insulation, and beneath it the dark, structurally complex biocrust surface absorbs and redistributes energy differently than pale, bare sediment. The consequence, as the study and the accompanying commentary by Lafuente emphasize, is that microbial activity in the soil below biocrusts continues at meaningful levels during months when uncrusted soils may freeze solid. Soil biogeochemistry — the sum of decomposition, respiration, nutrient mineralization and microbial transformations — is thus sustained rather than suspended.</p>
<p>This sustained activity has direct implications for the carbon cycle of cold deserts. Drylands collectively store large reservoirs of organic carbon in their soils, and biocrusts themselves are significant contributors to those reservoirs, fixing carbon dioxide through photosynthesis during moist periods and delivering it to the soil as organic matter. Winter is a season in which the balance between carbon input and carbon loss is delicate. When snow insulates the surface, heterotrophic microbes respire stored carbon slowly but steadily; when snow is absent and soils freeze deeply, physical and biological processes change abruptly, and freeze-thaw cycles can release pulses of carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide while damaging microbial cells and destabilizing aggregates. By keeping snow on the ground, moss biocrusts appear to buffer these dynamics, maintaining conditions under which soil functions proceed in a more continuous, less perturbed fashion.</p>
<p>The broader context of this work is the well-documented vulnerability of snow cover in a warming climate. Satellite records and ground observations across the Northern Hemisphere have documented declining snowpack extent, depth and duration, and projections consistently indicate further losses as winters warm. Research on snow drought has shown that human-caused warming has already reduced snowpack in many mountain regions, and studies of radiative forcing by dust and dark particles on snow have long demonstrated how small changes at the snow surface can accelerate melt. What the new study makes clear is that snow loss in cold deserts is not only a story about climate and atmosphere; it is also a story about the ground surface itself. Losing biocrusts removes a biological mechanism of snow retention precisely when climatic change is already eroding snow cover from the other direction — a compounding of stresses that could accelerate the degradation of dryland soils.</p>
<p>Biocrusts are, in fact, among the most threatened surface communities on the planet. Syntheses of global change effects have documented their sensitivity to warming, altered precipitation, and especially physical disturbance from livestock trampling, off-road vehicles, energy development and human foot traffic. Recovery is slow: cyanobacteria-dominated crusts may re-form in years to decades, while moss and lichen communities characteristic of cooler, more stable drylands can require centuries. Global assessments estimate that a large fraction of the world&#8217;s biocrusted area is already degraded. The new findings give that loss an additional dimension of concern. If biocrust destruction shortens snow cover duration in cold deserts, it exposes soils to deeper freezing, suppresses winter microbial activity, and potentially diminishes the very carbon and nitrogen inputs on which dryland ecosystems depend — a feedback loop in which surface degradation and soil function decline reinforce one another.</p>
<p>The study also reframes how scientists and land managers should think about seasonality in drylands. Much biocrust research has focused on the growing and rainfall seasons, when crusts are photosynthetically active and most visible in their influence on erosion and nutrient cycling. The winter findings shift attention to a period that has been comparatively neglected in dryland research, in part because cold deserts sit at the intersection of two disciplines: snow hydrology, which has traditionally focused on forests, mountains and tundra, and dryland ecology, which has traditionally focused on heat and aridity. By demonstrating that the two domains are physically and biologically coupled through the soil surface community, the work argues for integrating biocrust cover into models of snow dynamics, soil frost and winter carbon flux in cold deserts — regions that include substantial areas of the intermountain western United States, central Asia and high-altitude plateaus.</p>
<p>Writing in Nature Geoscience, Lafuente situates the study within this larger agenda, noting that biocrusts can substantially enhance snow retention and thereby sustain soil biogeochemistry, microbial activity and soil ecosystem functions in cold deserts. The commentary, which accompanies the research under the title &#8216;Winter carbon cycling beneath biocrusts&#8217;, underscores that the findings emerge from a long-term field program — a point worth emphasizing, because capturing interannual variability in snow depth, snow duration and soil response requires years of patient measurement in environments that are logistically demanding to monitor. It is precisely this kind of sustained observation that allows the causal chain from surface cover, to snowpack persistence, to winter soil function to be traced with confidence.</p>
<p>The implications reach toward both conservation and climate science. For land managers in cold deserts, protecting biocrusts from trampling and disturbance acquires a new rationale that goes beyond erosion control: intact moss biocrusts are, in effect, natural snow-management infrastructure. For Earth system modelers, the study suggests that the representation of dryland winter processes is incomplete without a term for biological surface cover and its effect on snow retention and soil thermal regimes. And for carbon accounting, the message is that the winter months in cold deserts — long treated as a blank interval between growing seasons — host active, cover-dependent biogeochemistry that could shift substantially as both climate and land use change. A crust of mosses a few millimeters thick, the study shows, quietly governs whether the soil beneath it sleeps through winter or keeps working — and with it, whether carbon in cold desert ecosystems remains stored or begins to move.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Influence of moss biocrusts on snow retention and winter soil carbon cycling in cold deserts</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Winter carbon cycling beneath biocrusts</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Lafuente, A. (2026). Winter carbon cycling beneath biocrusts. <em>Nature Geoscience, 19</em>(9), 1004-1005. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-02084-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-02084-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-026-02084-0" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41561-026-02084-0</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> biocrusts, cold deserts, snowpack, carbon cycle, soil biogeochemistry, microbial activity, moss, drylands, soil insulation, climate change, ecosystem ecology, Nature Geoscience</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">199136</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Moss and Algae Team Up to Rebuild Dead Karst Soils Fast</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/moss-and-algae-team-up-to-rebuild-dead-karst-soils-fast/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological soil crusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biological soil crusts in desertification control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon-nitrogen coupling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-inoculation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cyanobacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dissolved organic matter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecological engineering for karst soil restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecosystem engineering with native plant species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impact of cyanobacteria and fungi on soil health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[karst rocky desertification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moss and algae collaboration in soil recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural restoration techniques for karst landscapes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open-access research on]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photosynthetic communities in desert soil rehabilitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rapid ecological recovery in southwestern China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebuilding carbon and nitrogen cycles in degraded soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Role of mosses and algae in soil stabilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil enzymes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soil erosion mitigation through biological crusts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil restoration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=196311</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Scientists in China show that inoculating degraded karst soils with native moss and algae together rebuilds photosynthetic crusts, nutrient pools and microbial communities within 90 days.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the eroded, rock-strewn landscapes of southwestern China, where shallow soils cling precariously to fractured carbonate bedrock, land degradation has long seemed almost irreversible. Karst rocky desertification strips hillsides of vegetation, leaches away nutrients at extraordinary speed, and leaves behind soils so fragmented that natural recovery can stretch across decades or even centuries. A new open-access study in Environmental Earth Sciences now reports that a deceptively simple ecological engineering trick—sowing the ground with locally collected moss and native algae together—can jump-start the entire recovery process in as little as ninety days, transforming barren ground into a functioning photosynthetic community with rebuilt carbon and nitrogen cycles.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Zixu Chen and Pei Wang of the Institute of Hydrobiology at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, together with colleagues from the Institute of Karst Geology and other Chinese institutions, set out to test whether biological soil crusts, the living skins of cyanobacteria, algae, mosses, fungi and bacteria that blanket soil surfaces in the world&#8217;s drylands, could be deliberately induced on degraded karst soils. These crusts are celebrated among ecologists as ecosystem engineers: their filamentous networks and sticky extracellular polymeric substances bind soil particles, curb erosion, fix atmospheric carbon through photosynthesis, and pump bioavailable nitrogen into the ground via biological nitrogen fixation. But in karst terrain, with its shallow regolith, high calcium carbonate content and relentless hydrological instability, natural crust development stalls almost completely.</p>
<p>The experiment combined controlled laboratory work in Wuhan with a field trial at the Maocun Experimental Base in Guilin, part of the UNESCO-affiliated International Research Center on Karst. The team isolated two native algal strains from local degraded sites: one belonging to the genus Geminocystis, and a filamentous, nitrogen-fixing cyanobacterium identified as Leptolyngbya. The dominant local moss, Homomallium incurvatum, was surface-sterilized and propagated on half-strength Murashige and Skoog medium before inoculation. Four treatments were compared under both indoor and field conditions: an untreated control, algae alone, moss alone, and a combined moss–algae co-inoculation, with soil samples taken at 0, 30, 60 and 90 days to track the full cascade of chemical and biological change.</p>
<p>The headline result was unambiguous: co-inoculation outperformed every single-organism treatment across virtually every measured variable. Chlorophyll a, the standard proxy for photosynthetic biomass, climbed dramatically in the mixed treatment. Indoors, the co-inoculated soils reached 6.5 micrograms per square centimeter by day 90, nearly ten times the level of untreated controls and well above either moss-only or algae-only plots. Outdoors the same ranking held, with co-inoculation reaching 4.49 micrograms per square centimeter, a 74 percent increase over the control. Field photographs told the same visual story: control plots stayed dry, cracked and gray, while co-inoculated plots developed dense, vibrant green moss cover, more extensive than in moss-only treatments.</p>
<p>Underneath the green surface, the chemistry of the soil was changing just as fast. By day 90, nitrate concentrations in indoor co-inoculated plots had reached 11.68 milligrams per kilogram, roughly five times the control level, while ammonium rose by about 126 percent indoors and 188 percent in the field. Nitrite followed the same pattern, increasing nearly fivefold. Total and organic carbon climbed by roughly 61 to 162 percent in the mixed treatment compared with bare soil. The authors attribute this carbon gain to photosynthetic fixation by the developing crust and the incorporation of crust biomass and excreted polymers into stable soil organic matter pools—effectively the first stages of new soil formation on ground that had been functionally sterile.</p>
<p>Enzyme activity measurements provided the mechanistic bridge between these pools. Urease, which drives organic nitrogen mineralization, rose by 41 percent indoors and 43 percent in the field under co-inoculation, closely matching the concurrent surge in ammonium and nitrate. Sucrase, an indicator of carbon-cycling intensity, increased by about 39 percent, and alkaline phosphatase by around 21 to 24 percent, signaling heightened microbial demand for phosphorus in these naturally phosphorus-poor soils. The coordinated rise of all three enzymes pointed to a re-coupling of the carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus cycles—precisely the decoupling that earlier work has identified as the hallmark of dysfunction in degraded drylands.</p>
<p>Fluorescence spectroscopy of dissolved organic matter added a subtler layer of evidence. Using excitation–emission matrix analysis and parallel factor modeling, the team identified two humic-like and two protein-like fluorescent components in the soil solutions. Inoculated treatments showed elevated biological and freshness indices, indicating that the dissolved organic pool was increasingly dominated by fresh, microbially produced, labile compounds, while rising humification indices in moss and co-inoculation plots hinted at the earliest stages of stable humus formation. In other words, the crusts were not merely adding organic matter; they were shifting its composition toward forms that feed soil food webs and, eventually, lock carbon into the ground.</p>
<p>The microbial community itself underwent a striking succession. Photosynthetic communities began dominated by unicellular Synechococcales, typical of nutrient-starved early successional states, and shifted within ninety days toward filamentous, nitrogen-fixing Nostocales and Leptolyngbyales, the very taxa that confer structural stability to mature biocrusts. Fungal richness more than doubled, with saprotrophic Ascomycota becoming dominant and FUNGuild-based functional predictions showing increased decomposition activity alongside declining pathotrophs. Bacterial functional profiling through FAPROTAX revealed enrichment of nitrate reduction, nitrate respiration, nitrite ammonification and complex carbon degradation pathways such as cellulolysis and ligninolysis. Together these shifts describe the assembly of an integrated decomposer-fixer network where only a fragmented microbial web had existed before.</p>
<p>The practical implications are considerable. Unlike conventional restoration approaches such as spraying exogenous soil, which demand heavy machinery and repeated inputs, moss–algae co-inoculation relies on locally collected, self-regenerating biological material that progressively builds soil structure and fertility with minimal intervention. The authors caution that their trial covered only ninety days at a single site under relatively stable weather, so the resilience of these young crusts to droughts, frosts and other climatic extremes during the fragile establishment window remains untested. Still, within a single season the technique demonstrably accelerated nutrient accumulation, enzyme activation, organic matter humification and microbial reorganization—a positive feedback loop linking surface stabilization, carbon input and nutrient cycling. For the millions of hectares of degraded karst in China and around the world, deliberately cultivated living crusts may offer one of the fastest, cheapest and most self-sustaining paths back to functional soil.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Induced composite biological soil crusts for early-stage restoration of karst rocky desertification soils</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Construction of composite biological soil crusts accelerates early-stage soil restoration in karst rocky desertification areas</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Chen, Z., Li, T., He, X., Yang, H., Huang, F., Cao, J., Wang, P., &amp; Wang, G. (2026). Construction of composite biological soil crusts accelerates early-stage soil restoration in karst rocky desertification areas. <em>Environmental Earth Sciences, 85</em>(15), Article 400. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-026-13121-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-026-13121-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-026-13121-x" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s12665-026-13121-x</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> karst rocky desertification, biological soil crusts, moss, algae, co-inoculation, soil restoration, carbon-nitrogen coupling, cyanobacteria, soil enzymes, dissolved organic matter, microbial communities, ecological engineering</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">196311</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
