<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Montastraea cavernosa &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/montastraea-cavernosa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 00:57:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Habitat, Not Hidden Genes, Drives Coral Chemistry Under Heat Stress</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/habitat-not-hidden-genes-drives-coral-chemistry-under-heat-stress/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2026 00:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coral adaptation to variable environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coral Bleaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coral genetic diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coral heat stress response]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coral metabolomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coral reef restoration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coral reefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptic coral lineages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptic lineages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental influences on coral biochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Keys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida Keys coral ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genotype-environment interaction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitat-driven coral chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine heat wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass spectrometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metabolomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montastraea cavernosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nearshore vs offshore coral populations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phenotypic plasticity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reciprocal transplant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reciprocal transplant experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reef restoration]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=260618</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A reciprocal transplant experiment in the Florida Keys reveals that the environment, not cryptic genetic lineage, is the strongest driver of growth and metabolomic profiles in the great star coral during a record marine heat wave.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beneath the surface of the Florida Keys, two populations of the great star coral, Montastraea cavernosa, look so similar that even experienced divers cannot tell them apart. Yet their genomes tell a different story. These are cryptic genetic lineages, MC4 and MC7, two branches of the same nominal species that interbreed so rarely that their genomes have drifted apart while their appearance has stayed essentially identical. MC4 dominates the nearshore shallows, where water runs warm and variable and carries nutrients washing off the land. MC7 clusters on offshore reefs, bathed in the cooler, more stable waters influenced by the Florida Current. For restoration scientists, this hidden diversity poses an awkward question: if two genetically distinct corals occupy different habitats, does each lineage carry a unique biochemical toolkit suited to its home reef, or do both simply respond to whatever environment they find themselves in?</p>
<p>A new study published in the journal Metabolomics set out to answer that question with one of the most direct experimental designs available to ecologists: a reciprocal transplant. Researchers from the University of Texas at Austin, Mote Marine Laboratory, and partner institutions collected fragments of both lineages from two shallow reef sites in the Lower Florida Keys, Carly&#8217;s Patch and Haslun&#8217;s Heads, split each fragment into genetically identical clones, and swapped half of them between the sites. Over ten weeks in the summer of 2023, the team tracked how each clone grew and how its entire suite of small molecules, its metabolome, shifted in response to its new surroundings. The design allowed a direct comparison of genetically identical coral tissue experiencing two different environments simultaneously.</p>
<p>The genetic groundwork came first. The team collected 160 tissue samples using needleless syringes to isolate single polyps, extracted DNA with a phenol-chloroform protocol, and prepared 2bRAD sequencing libraries run on an Illumina NovaSeq 6000. After quality filtering with CUTADAPT and mapping reads to the M. cavernosa reference genome with bowtie2, the researchers computed genetic distances with ANGSD, filtered out clones and technical replicates, and combined their samples with previously published datasets to reach 392 individuals. From 7,346 single nucleotide polymorphisms, they assigned lineage membership using admixture analysis, excluding any individual with more than 25 percent assignment to a second lineage. That left 60 colonies, 15 of each lineage from each site, for the transplant itself.</p>
<p>Each selected colony contributed roughly ten square centimeters of tissue, which was fragmented, glued to bolts, weighed by buoyant weight, and mounted on PVC rigs covered with plastic mesh to deter fish that nibble on coral. Two HOBO temperature loggers accompanied each rig, recording water temperature every five minutes. The experiment ran from May 23 to July 28, 2023, a window that turned out to be far from ordinary. The Florida Keys experienced an unprecedented marine heat wave that summer, with sea surface temperatures near Key West reaching 31.5 degrees Celsius and a regional mass bleaching event sweeping the reef tract. The transplant thus became an accidental stress test, measuring how both lineages respond to environmental change under some of the hottest conditions the region has recorded.</p>
<p>The temperature loggers revealed a consistent and statistically significant difference between the two sites. Carly&#8217;s Patch, the nearshore location, ran warmer than Haslun&#8217;s Heads throughout the deployment, by roughly one degree Celsius on average. That modest gap proved biologically meaningful. When the researchers measured growth by comparing final buoyant weights to initial ones, correcting for the fact that larger fragments grow faster, they found that corals transplanted to Haslun&#8217;s Heads grew significantly more than their genetically identical clones left at Carly&#8217;s Patch. A linear mixed-effects model showed that final site was the only significant predictor of growth, with lineage and origin site falling short of significance and none of the interactions among them mattering. Three of the four lineage-by-site comparisons reached statistical significance individually, and the fourth showed the same directional trend.</p>
<p>The metabolomic analysis told a parallel story with more resolution. The team extracted metabolites from preserved coral tissue and analyzed them by ultra high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to heated electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry on a Q Exactive orbitrap instrument. Processing the raw data with MZMine, building feature-based molecular networks on the GNPS platform, and predicting molecular formulas and structures with SIRIUS yielded 9,806 unique metabolite features, of which 2,191 passed abundance filtering for statistical analysis. Permutational multivariate analysis of variance delivered the study&#8217;s central surprise: final habitat explained 24 percent of the variation in metabolomic profiles, while lineage explained only 9 percent. Both were highly significant, but the environment the coral currently occupied outweighed its genetic identity by a wide margin.</p>
<p>Volcano plots of differentially abundant features sharpened the picture. Comparing lineages revealed 203 significantly different metabolite features, a genuine biochemical signature of cryptic genetic divergence. But comparing final sites revealed 195 differentially abundant features, and heatmaps showed that corals clustered by the site where they ended up rather than by the lineage they belonged to, a pattern that held when the analysis focused on putative carbohydrates and on amino acids and peptides. Only two features differed between corals that stayed home and those that were switched, suggesting that what mattered was where a fragment lived, not whether it had moved. Principal coordinate analysis confirmed the pattern: one axis separated the lineages, but a second axis, explaining more variance, separated the final sites cleanly.</p>
<p>The authors had predicted the opposite outcome. Because prior work had shown environmental specialization in M. cavernosa lineages and suggested that metabolomic profiles can predict coral genotypes, they expected lineage assignment to dominate the chemical phenotype and native-habitat corals to outperform transplants. Instead, both lineages responded to the new environment in similar ways, growing faster and shifting their metabolomes in parallel when placed in the cooler offshore site. The findings contradict studies of the mustard hill coral, Porites astreoides, which showed strong local acclimatization and reduced fitness after transplantation, and they diverge from an Indo-Pacific transplant study where survival tracked coral morphology rather than site. They do, however, echo a recent Great Barrier Reef study of Acropora millepora in which all corals outplanted to one location outperformed those at another, regardless of origin.</p>
<p>The researchers are careful about interpretation. Metabolomic profiles integrate an organism&#8217;s recent physiological and environmental history, but differences in metabolite abundance do not translate directly into differences in health, survival, or fitness, and the functional roles of most metabolites in this species remain unknown. Because the experiment coincided with an acute thermal stress event and the two sites differed in temperature, the site effects should be read as responses to conditions during a heat wave rather than as evidence of stable habitat specialization. The extractions were performed on intact tissue, so the team cannot say whether the observed plasticity comes from the coral host, its algal symbionts, or its microbiome, and they call for microbiome gene-expression work and longer, multi-season transplants to disentangle these contributions.</p>
<p>Even with those caveats, the practical implications for reef restoration are striking. Restoration programs increasingly cultivate diverse coral genotypes in nurseries and outplant them to degraded reefs, and cryptic lineages complicate decisions about which strains belong where. This study suggests that, at least in the short term under thermal stress, the habitat a coral is outplanted to may matter more than its cryptic lineage affiliation. A cooler site produced faster growth and a distinct chemical phenotype in both lineages alike, hinting that sites near the cooling influence of the Florida Current could function as refugia similar to the mangrove habitats recently proposed for Caribbean corals. If future longer-term experiments confirm that lineage-by-habitat interactions remain weak, restoration practitioners could prioritize matching corals to favorable environmental contexts rather than investing heavily in lineage-specific sourcing, a simplification that could make rebuilding devastated reef tracts faster, cheaper, and more effective as ocean temperatures continue to climb.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Environmental and genetic drivers of metabolomic variation in cryptic lineages of the great star coral Montastraea cavernosa</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Environmental drivers of metabolomic profiles within and between cryptic lineages of Montastraea cavernosa, the great star coral</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Environmental drivers of metabolomic profiles within and between cryptic lineages of Montastraea cavernosa, the great star coral. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-026-02545-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-026-02545-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-026-02545-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11306-026-02545-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> coral reefs, Montastraea cavernosa, cryptic lineages, metabolomics, reciprocal transplant, Florida Keys, marine heat wave, phenotypic plasticity, reef restoration, genotype-environment interaction, mass spectrometry, coral bleaching</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">260618</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glitter Found Inside Corals on Remote Atlantic Islands in a First for Science</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/glitter-found-inside-corals-on-remote-atlantic-islands-in-a-first-for-science/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Reese Ellison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 22:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coral reefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coral species affected by microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coral tissue plastic pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of plastic debris on reef-building corals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first discovery of glitter in corals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glitter ingestion by marine organisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implications of plastic infiltration in pristine environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine biodiversity and plastic contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martim Vaz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics in coral reefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Montastraea cavernosa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mussismilia hispida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean currents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ocean pollution and isolated island ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastic pollution detection in coral soft tissues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyethylene terephthalate in marine ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raman spectroscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote Atlantic islands environmental impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Atlantic Subtropical Gyre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trindade]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=235994</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For the first time, scientists have documented hexagonal PET glitter particles ingested by corals on the remote Trindade and Martim Vaz archipelago, revealing that even nearly uninhabited oceanic reefs act as sinks for microplastic pollution.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On two of the most isolated islands in the Atlantic Ocean, scientists have found something unexpected glittering beneath the waves. Corals living around the Trindade and Martim Vaz archipelago, a volcanic island group roughly 1,140 kilometers east of the Brazilian coast, have been ingesting microscopic particles of glitter. The discovery, reported in the journal Discover Oceans, marks the first time glitter particles have ever been documented inside coral tissue, and it delivers a sobering message: no marine ecosystem, however remote, is beyond the reach of plastic pollution.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Lucas Gonçalves Queiroz of the University of São Paulo, examined fragments of two reef-building coral species collected in May 2022 from three sampling sites across the archipelago. One species, Mussismilia hispida, is endemic to Brazil, while the other, Montastraea cavernosa, ranges widely across the Atlantic. Both are scleractinian, or stony, corals, the architects of reef structures that shelter roughly a quarter of all marine species on less than one percent of the ocean floor. What the researchers found inside the soft tissues of these animals was startling in both quantity and identity: flat, hexagonal flakes of polyethylene terephthalate, the polymer better known as PET, which forms the reflective core of virtually all commercial glitter.</p>
<p>The numbers are striking. In M. hispida from the Trindade sampling site designated TR2, the team counted an average of 629.63 glitter particles per gram of soft tissue, with a standard deviation of 101.23. M. cavernosa from the same site contained an average of 304.76 particles per gram, while M. cavernosa from Martim Vaz, 48 kilometers away, carried a lower but still significant load of 62.92 particles per gram. The average particle size was just 28.10 micrometers, with a standard deviation of 7.17, meaning these flakes are smaller than the width of a human hair. Notably, the study counted only particles that had been internalized within the coral&#8217;s soft tissue; particles adhering to external surfaces were excluded, so the true contamination burden is likely far higher.</p>
<p>Identifying the particles required a two-step chemical digestion process. Coral fragments were first treated with potassium hydroxide at 60 degrees Celsius for 48 hours, then with hydrogen peroxide under the same conditions, dissolving the biological material and liberating any embedded plastics. The resulting suspension was filtered through a 0.6-micrometer fiberglass membrane and examined under a stereomicroscope. To confirm the polymer identity, the team used Raman spectroscopy with a 532-nanometer laser, comparing the spectra of extracted particles against those of new commercial glitter. The extracted particles displayed the same characteristic PET vibrational bands at 632, 859, 1288, 1615, and 1725 inverse centimeters, corresponding to carbon-hydrogen bending, carbon-carbon-oxygen stretching, carbon-oxygen stretching, aromatic ring vibrations, and carbonyl stretching respectively. The match was unambiguous.</p>
<p>Rigorous contamination controls underscore the reliability of the findings. All glassware was rinsed repeatedly with filtered ultrapure water and cleaned with acetone-soaked cotton, reagents were pre-filtered, and all manipulation took place in a fume hood with researchers wearing nitrile gloves and cotton lab coats. A control experiment run without coral samples detected only 5.3 colorless fibers on average, which were excluded because they did not match the hexagonal platelet morphology under investigation. The team also restricted their visual analysis to hexagonal particles, which account for approximately 77.8 percent of global glitter production, to ensure accuracy in identification. One lone star-shaped particle turned up in the samples but was excluded from the counts.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most puzzling aspect of the discovery is the source. The Martim Vaz islets are too small to support human habitation, and Trindade hosts only a small Brazilian Navy facility whose inorganic waste is either shipped to the mainland for recycling or incinerated on site. Since 2018, the archipelago has sat within a marine protected area covering roughly 925,000 square kilometers. Glitter is not used there. The researchers therefore conclude that the particles arrived by sea, most likely carried within the South Atlantic Subtropical Gyre, the vast wind-driven current system that traps floating debris in what has become known as the South Atlantic Garbage Patch, an accumulation zone spanning approximately 0.7 million square kilometers.</p>
<p>The archipelago lies about 500 kilometers north of the garbage patch&#8217;s core, and its windward beaches already accumulate stranded plastics carried by the gyre&#8217;s counterclockwise rotation. Modeling studies identify South America and Africa as the primary land-based sources of debris in the region, though discarded bottles from Asian shipping now dominate the floating litter found as far away as Tristan da Cunha. Shipping itself is a plausible glitter vector: a recent analysis estimated that up to a quarter of the global cruise fleet discharges untreated sewage directly into the ocean, releasing as much as 100,000 tons of microplastics annually. Wastewater treatment plants on continents, each capable of emitting tens of millions of microplastic particles per day, add to the load that currents eventually sweep into open water.</p>
<p>The physical properties of glitter make it a particularly insidious pollutant. Glitter flakes are typically cut from biaxially oriented PET film coated with aluminum for reflectivity, and variants made of polyvinyl chloride and poly(methyl methacrylate) also exist. All three polymers are denser than seawater, which should cause them to sink, yet turbulence can keep them suspended and transport them across entire ocean basins. As the particles weather, abrasion, ultraviolet radiation, oxidation, and microbial attack degrade the plastic, reducing its molecular mass and density, which increases resuspension and extends the distance particles can travel. The degradation signs observed in the Trindade corals, including rough surfaces, faded color, and irregular edges, suggest the particles had spent varying lengths of time in the environment, hinting that contamination occurred repeatedly rather than in a single event.</p>
<p>Why corals accumulate these particles is a question of growing ecological urgency. Reef structures physically reduce water turbulence, enhancing the retention and deposition of suspended particles, and corals ingest plastics both actively through feeding and passively through mucus production. M. hispida, notably, can shift between autotrophic and heterotrophic feeding multiple times a year in response to environmental stress, and greater reliance on capturing prey may explain its higher glitter burden, though the authors caution this hypothesis remains untested. Laboratory studies have already shown that microplastic ingestion can impair feeding performance and growth in corals, trigger oxidative stress and histological damage, and suppress detoxification and immune capacities. Small particles are especially concerning because they tend to be retained within the digestive system, potentially causing blockages and cumulative exposure, and their size only decreases as degradation proceeds.</p>
<p>The concentrations documented in this remote archipelago exceed those reported for corals near inhabited coastlines, a comparison the authors describe as surprising given that no glitter is used locally. Previous studies in the South China Sea and near Taiwan recorded microplastic loads in corals that were orders of magnitude lower per gram of tissue, though those studies focused on larger particles. The finding suggests that surveys targeting only larger microplastics may dramatically underestimate contamination, and that glitter, a single-use material whose global market was valued at 353 million dollars in 2020 and is projected to reach 526 million dollars by 2026, deserves far more scrutiny. The European Union has already moved to ban the intentional addition of synthetic polymer microparticles, including glitter, in commercial products under Commission Regulation 2023/2055. As the authors conclude, coral reefs act as sinks for microplastic pollution, and with limited pathways for permanent removal, concentrations in these ecosystems will only rise unless primary microplastics are curbed at the source. For the corals of Trindade and Martim Vaz, the sparkle of the party industry has arrived in one of the ocean&#8217;s last wild places, and it is not leaving.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Microplastic glitter contamination in corals of a remote Atlantic archipelago</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> First record of glitter particles in coral reefs from a remote archipelago in the Atlantic Ocean</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Queiroz, L. G., Maricato, G., Gomes, E., Lima, G. V., Ando, R. A., Tavares, M., Pompêo, M., &amp; Rani-Borges, B. (2026). First record of glitter particles in coral reefs from a remote archipelago in the Atlantic Ocean. <em>Discover Oceans, 3</em>(1), Article 11. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44289-026-00127-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44289-026-00127-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44289-026-00127-3" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44289-026-00127-3</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> microplastics, glitter, coral reefs, Trindade, Martim Vaz, PET, Raman spectroscopy, marine pollution, South Atlantic Subtropical Gyre, Mussismilia hispida, Montastraea cavernosa, ocean currents</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">235994</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
