<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>molecular structure &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/molecular-structure/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:27:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Hidden Electron Donors Steer the Molecular Architecture of Propylene–Ethylene Copolymers</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/hidden-electron-donors-steer-the-molecular-architecture-of-propylene-ethylene-copolymers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon-13 NMR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catalyst structure–property relationships]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copolymer crystallization and flexibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effect of electron donors on copolymer properties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethylene incorporation in polypropylene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heterogeneous Ziegler–Natta catalysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of electron donors on polymer structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of internal stereoregulating agents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal electron donor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isotacticity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular fingerprinting of catalysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monomer sequence distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polypropylene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propylene–ethylene copolymer applications in packaging and automotive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propylene–ethylene copolymer molecular architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propylene–ethylene copolymerization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[random copolymer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of organic electron donors in polymer synthesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stereoregulating donor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supported titanium–magnesium catalyst systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temperature rising elution fractionation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[titanium–magnesium catalysts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ziegler–Natta catalysts]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=209113</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study shows that the internal electron donor in titanium–magnesium Ziegler–Natta catalysts controls how ethylene units are sequenced in the low-molecular-weight fraction of propylene–ethylene random copolymers.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Random propylene–ethylene copolymers sit quietly inside countless everyday products, from impact-resistant automotive trim to food packaging, translucent medical devices and flexible pipe systems. Their value lies in a delicate molecular bargain: a small amount of ethylene, typically only a few percent of the monomer units, is woven into an otherwise isotactic polypropylene backbone, disrupting crystallization just enough to enhance clarity, toughness and flexibility without sacrificing the melt strength that makes polypropylene so easy to process. Yet the industrial catalysts that build these copolymers are notoriously heterogeneous, and a new study from the Boreskov Institute of Catalysis in Novosibirsk has now revealed in fine detail how one seemingly invisible ingredient of the catalyst, the internal stereoregulating electron donor, leaves a measurable fingerprint on the molecular structure of the resulting copolymer.</p>
<p>The research, published in Polymer Bulletin by Arina S. Garkul, Artem A. Barabanov, Vladimir A. Zakharov and Mikhail A. Matsko, examines propylene–ethylene copolymerization over supported titanium–magnesium catalysts, the workhorse Ziegler–Natta systems that dominate global polypropylene production. These catalysts consist of titanium chloride species dispersed on a magnesium chloride support, but they also carry a fourth, less obvious component: an internal electron donor, an organic molecule such as a phthalate, a succinate or a diether that is incorporated into the catalyst during synthesis. The donor is not a passive filler. It coordinates to magnesium chloride surfaces, shapes the coordination geometry of titanium active sites and suppresses those sites that would otherwise produce non-stereoregular, atactic polymer. In homopolymerization, the influence of donors on isotacticity has been studied extensively; what this new work adds is a systematic picture of how donor chemistry affects the way ethylene comonomer is distributed along the polymer chains.</p>
<p>The team prepared random copolymers containing between four and five mole percent ethylene using three titanium–magnesium catalysts that differed only in the composition of their internal stereoregulating donors: di-n-butyl phthalate, an aromatic phthalate ester long used in industrial formulations; 2-isopropyl-2-isopentyl-1,3-dimethoxypropane, a representative of the diether class that replaced phthalates in many modern catalyst generations; and diethyl 2,3-diisobutyl succinate, an aliphatic succinate ester. Holding the overall comonomer content constant across the three systems was a deliberate design choice. It meant that any differences uncovered in the distribution of ethylene within the polymer chains, rather than the average amount incorporated, could be attributed to the donor chemistry itself, a distinction that bulk characterization alone would completely miss.</p>
<p>To expose those hidden differences, the researchers turned to preparative temperature rising elution fractionation, a powerful technique that separates a copolymer into fractions according to crystallizability, which in turn reflects both molecular weight and the local content and placement of comonomer units. From each copolymer, five fractions were isolated that differed systematically in molecular weight and isotacticity. For every fraction, the team determined the ethylene content, the weight-average molecular weight, the melting temperature and the degree of crystallinity. This fraction-by-fraction dissection converts what appears to be a single, uniform material into a layered portrait of molecular populations, each carrying its own record of which catalytic sites created it and under what stereochemical constraints they operated.</p>
<p>The headline finding is a striking asymmetry in how ethylene distributes across the molecular weight spectrum. The three fractions characterized by high molecular weight, with weight-average molecular weights between roughly 210 and 660 kilograms per mole, and by high isotacticity, showed ethylene contents that were not only mutually consistent within each copolymer but also essentially independent of which internal donor had been used. These high-molecular-weight, highly isotactic chains are the product of the most stereospecific active sites on the catalyst, and the study demonstrates that whatever donor governs the catalyst, those sites incorporate ethylene at a similar and relatively restrained rate. In other words, the most selective sites behave with a kind of chemical uniformity that transcends the specific donor molecule bound nearby.</p>
<p>The picture changes abruptly in the two lower-molecular-weight fractions, where the weight-average molecular weights fell between about 90 and 180 kilograms per mole. Here, the ethylene content increased sharply, indicating that the less stereospecific active sites responsible for these shorter chains incorporate ethylene far more readily than the highly isospecific sites. This correlation between lower stereospecificity, lower molecular weight and elevated comonomer incorporation has long been suspected from studies of Ziegler–Natta catalysts, but quantifying it for copolymers with matched overall composition, and showing where the boundary lies between donor-independent and donor-dependent behavior, gives the observation a new level of rigor and practical relevance.</p>
<p>Carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy then took the analysis to the level of monomer sequences, the finest structural resolution available for these materials. For the low-molecular-weight copolymer fractions, the researchers quantified the content of uninterrupted ethylene triads, denoted EEE segments, mixed ethylene–ethylene–propylene segments, denoted PEE, and isolated ethylene units flanked by propylene on both sides, denoted PEP. The choice of internal donor had little effect on these sequences for the high-molecular-weight, highly isotactic fractions, but exerted a noticeable and statistically meaningful influence on the proportions of EEE, PEE and PEP segments in the low-molecular-weight fractions. Some donors produced low-molecular-weight material in which ethylene units cluster into short runs, while others favored a more isolated, statistically random placement of ethylene within the propylene matrix.</p>
<p>The practical significance of this sequence-level control should not be underestimated. In random propylene–ethylene copolymers, the thermal and mechanical properties are governed less by the average ethylene content than by how the ethylene is distributed. Long ethylene sequences can act as defects that depress melting temperature and crystallinity and can even form separate polyethylene-like crystalline domains, whereas isolated ethylene units subtly disrupt the polypropylene crystal lattice and produce the clarity and toughness that designers of transparent containers and hot-fill packaging demand. A catalyst manufacturer who can tune the donor to control whether low-molecular-weight chains carry clustered or isolated ethylene units thereby gains a direct lever over haze, stiffness, impact strength and sealing behavior, all without changing the reactor feed composition.</p>
<p>The study also connects to a broader industrial and scientific conversation. Phthalate donors, once ubiquitous, have faced scrutiny over health and environmental concerns, driving the shift toward succinates and diethers in commercial catalysts, and recent high-throughput, data-driven donor screening programs have accelerated the search for next-generation donor molecules. The Novosibirsk results add an important constraint to that search: any candidate donor must not only deliver high activity and isotacticity in homopolymerization but must also be judged by how it reshapes the comonomer sequence distribution in the less stereospecific fraction of the copolymer. The work was carried out within the governmental assignment of the Russian Ministry of Science and Higher Education for the Boreskov Institute of Catalysis, and the authors acknowledge contributions from colleagues responsible for catalyst synthesis, molecular weight distribution analysis and NMR spectroscopy.</p>
<p>What emerges from this research is a refined mental model of the Ziegler–Natta catalyst as an ensemble of active sites with distinct personalities. The most isospecific, high-molecular-weight sites are remarkably consistent incorperating ethylene regardless of the internal donor, while the less stereospecific, lower-molecular-weight sites are exquisitely sensitive to the donor&#8217;s chemical identity, changing both how much ethylene they incorporate and how those units are arranged along the chain. For a polymer industry that increasingly demands precisely engineered materials rather than commodity plastics, this donor-level control of molecular microstructure represents exactly the kind of fundamental insight that translates into better films, tougher moldings and clearer packaging, all flowing from a molecule that most consumers will never know exists.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Effect of internal electron donor composition on the molecular structure of propylene–ethylene copolymers made with supported titanium–magnesium Ziegler–Natta catalysts</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Propylene–ethylene copolymerization over titanium–magnesium catalysts: the effect of the composition of an internal stereoregulating electron donor on the molecular structure of the copolymer</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Garkul, A. S., Barabanov, A. A., Zakharov, V. A., &amp; Matsko, M. A. (2026). Propylene–ethylene copolymerization over titanium–magnesium catalysts: the effect of the composition of an internal stereoregulating electron donor on the molecular structure of the copolymer. <em>Polymer Bulletin, 83</em>(11), Article 634. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-026-06688-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-026-06688-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-026-06688-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00289-026-06688-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> titanium–magnesium catalysts, Ziegler–Natta catalysts, propylene–ethylene copolymerization, internal electron donor, stereoregulating donor, random copolymer, temperature rising elution fractionation, carbon-13 NMR, monomer sequence distribution, isotacticity, molecular structure, polypropylene</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">209113</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cryo-EM Reveals How Cas12a Uses a DNA Guide to Hunt RNA Targets</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/cryo-em-reveals-how-cas12a-uses-a-dna-guide-to-hunt-rna-targets/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 15:29:46 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acidaminococcus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biotechnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cas12a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cas12a enzyme mechanism for RNA detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRISPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CRISPR Cas12a RNA target recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryo-electron microscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryo-electron microscopy of Cas12a DNA guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryo-EM study of Cas12a pseudo-DNA guide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diagnostics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA-guided recognition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA-guided RNA targeting mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gene editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genome editing with Cas12a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular basis of RNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular structure of CRISPR-Cas12a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNA and DNA guide interaction in CRISPR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RNA target]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structural insights into RNA target hunting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structural mimicry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structural mimicry in CRISPR enzymes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=195919</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new cryo-EM structure of Acidaminococcus sp. Cas12a reveals how the enzyme uses a DNA guide and structural mimicry to recognize and cleave RNA targets, providing a blueprint for engineering CRISPR systems.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CRISPR world has long been organized around a simple division of labor: some Cas enzymes are steered by RNA guides to cut DNA, while others are loaded with DNA guides to find RNA. That second group, the DNA-guided strands of the CRISPR family, has remained far less understood at the structural level, even though it includes Cas12a, one of the most widely used tools in genome editing. Now a team led by Ocampo and Orosco has captured the most intimate portrait yet of this molecular machine, reporting in Nature Structural &amp; Molecular Biology a cryo-electron microscopy structure of Acidaminococcus sp. Cas12a bound simultaneously to a pseudo-DNA guide and an RNA target. The image resolves a puzzle that has shadowed the field for a decade: how an enzyme built to read DNA instructions can still recognize, verify and destroy an RNA molecule with exquisite precision.</p>
<p>The structure shows that the answer lies in a strategy biologists describe as structural mimicry. When Cas12a takes up its DNA guide, the complex does not merely carry the guide as a passive address label. Instead, the enzyme and the guide together fold into a shape that persuades the incoming RNA target that it has met a compatible partner. The guide strand and parts of the protein scaffold arrange themselves into a geometry that resembles the duplex the RNA would normally form, allowing the RNA to thread into the complex and pair with the guide as though it were engaging a conventional nucleic-acid partner. In other words, the system speaks RNA&#8217;s language while carrying DNA&#8217;s script.</p>
<p>To appreciate why this matters, it helps to recall what makes Cas12a unusual among CRISPR nucleases. Unlike Cas9, which requires two separate RNA molecules to form its active guide and creates blunt cuts in DNA, Cas12a needs only a single short RNA guide, recognizes a distinct class of protospacer-adjacent motifs, and cuts DNA in a staggered fashion that leaves overhanging ends prized by genome engineers. Cas12a also belongs to the subset of CRISPR effectors whose natural guide can be encoded in DNA, and once activated by a matching target it unleashes indiscriminate collateral cutting of nearby single-stranded nucleic acids, a behavior that underpins a growing portfolio of diagnostic tests. Every one of those applications depends on the same underlying event: the correct pairing of the guide with the intended target inside the enzyme&#8217;s grip.</p>
<p>The newly determined structure captures that event in remarkable detail. Acidaminococcus sp. Cas12a is seen cradling the pseudo-DNA guide in its central channel, with the guide&#8217;s seed region, the stretch of sequence that makes first contact with a prospective target, held in an ordered conformation that pre-organizes it for recognition. When the RNA target arrives, it threads through the complex and pairs with the guide, and the resulting hybrid duplex sits within a pocket lined with positively charged residues that stabilize the intertwined strands. Around this core, the protein domains that had been clamped open in the absence of a target rearrange into a catalytically competent architecture, snapping the enzyme into its cutting mode. The structure therefore presents both the resting and the engaged states of recognition in a single frozen moment.</p>
<p>What stands out most is how the pseudo-DNA guide participates in the deception. In related systems, RNA guides form extensive pairing interactions with the protein that keep them in the correct register. Here, the DNA guide relies on a hybrid strategy: parts of it mimic the conformation that an RNA guide would adopt, while the protein supplies compensatory contacts that read DNA&#8217;s distinctive chemical features, including the absence of the 2′-hydroxyl groups that decorate RNA. The researchers show that this arrangement allows the complex to present a target-binding surface that is effectively indistinguishable, in shape and charge distribution, from the surface presented by RNA-guided relatives. The RNA target, encountering this surface, binds and pairs with a partner that is chemically DNA but structurally fluent in RNA.</p>
<p>This mimicry extends to the catalytic heart of the enzyme. Cas12a&#8217;s nuclease activity depends on the RuvC domain, a processing module shared with other members of the CRISPR-Cas superfamily. In the new structure, the RuvC active site is positioned relative to the guide-target duplex in a way that mirrors its placement in RNA-guided complexes, confirming that the downstream cutting machinery does not care whether the guide is made of DNA or RNA. What matters is the geometry of the duplex delivered to it. By achieving that geometry through mimicry, Acidaminococcus Cas12a solves a chemical problem that would otherwise seem insurmountable: a DNA guide cannot form the same Watson-Crick interactions with the protein that RNA guides use, yet it must produce the same structural outcome.</p>
<p>The biological logic of such a system is thought to trace back to the evolutionary history of CRISPR effectors. Many researchers believe that the ancestral defense machines were RNA-guided, targeting the genetic material of viruses directly, and that DNA-guided variants emerged as immune systems shifted toward attacking DNA genomes. The new structure offers a snapshot of how that transition could be engineered by evolution without redesigning the whole enzyme: keep the recognition and cutting apparatus intact, and evolve the guide-binding channel so that a DNA guide is chaperoned into an RNA-like conformation. Structural mimicry, in this view, is not a curiosity but an economical evolutionary patch, and the pseudo-DNA guide captured in the structure may itself represent an intermediate stage in that ongoing molecular negotiation.</p>
<p>For technologists, the structure arrives as something closer to a blueprint than a curiosity. Genome editing with Cas12a is already routine in laboratories, and its single-guide simplicity, compact size and staggered cuts have made it a favorite for applications ranging from agriculture to therapeutic development. But rational engineering of Cas12a, whether to alter its motif preferences, improve its specificity, retune its collateral activity for diagnostics, or expand the range of sequences it can target, has been constrained by incomplete knowledge of how the DNA guide and the RNA target actually sit inside the enzyme. By showing precisely which residues cradle the guide, which contacts read the target, and which conformational changes license cutting, the structure gives engineers a map of the interaction surfaces they can mutate deliberately rather than by trial and error.</p>
<p>The diagnostic implications may be especially immediate. Cas12a-based assays, which detect pathogens or disease sequences by coupling target recognition to a fluorescent collateral-cutting reaction, depend critically on the sensitivity and specificity of the initial guide-target pairing. Understanding how a DNA guide presents itself to an RNA target, and how mismatches are sensed within the duplex, opens the door to designing guides and protein variants that discriminate more sharply between true targets and near matches, reducing false positives that have complicated real-world deployment. It also suggests routes to building entirely new guide chemistries: if the enzyme tolerates a pseudo-DNA guide, other modified nucleic acids might be accommodated within the same channel, each tuned for stability or detection chemistry.</p>
<p>Therapeutic engineering stands to gain as well. Cas12a&#8217;s relatively compact size makes it deliverable in gene-therapy vehicles that struggle to carry bulkier nucleases, and a validated atomic model of its target-recognition state enables computational screening of variants before any test tube is touched. Researchers seeking to minimize off-target editing can now ask structural questions that were previously unanswerable: which protein contacts relax the specificity of pairing, and which lock the seed region into a demanding standard. The same map can guide the design of anti-CRISPR or regulatory proteins that jam the recognition interface, offering a way to switch editing on or off in living systems.</p>
<p>Like any single structure, the model of Acidaminococcus Cas12a bound to a pseudo-DNA guide and RNA target is one frame in what is certainly a dynamic process. The enzyme undergoes further rearrangements during target cleavage and product release that remain to be visualized, and different Cas12a homologs may solve the DNA-guided recognition problem with variations on the theme revealed here. But the central finding is unlikely to change: the division between RNA-guided and DNA-guided CRISPR systems is thinner than it appears. At the level of three-dimensional architecture, the two families speak the same structural language, and one has been caught in the act of translation. That translation, now legible at near-atomic resolution, is precisely the kind of insight from which the next generation of CRISPR tools will be built.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Cryo-EM structure of Acidaminococcus sp. Cas12a bound to a pseudo-DNA guide and RNA target</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Architecture of a DNA-guided Cas12a</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Architecture of a DNA-guided Cas12a. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-026-01894-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-026-01894-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-026-01894-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41594-026-01894-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Cas12a, CRISPR, cryo-electron microscopy, structural mimicry, DNA-guided recognition, RNA target, gene editing, Acidaminococcus, nuclease, molecular structure, biotechnology, diagnostics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">195919</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
