<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>molecular networking &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/molecular-networking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 05:03:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Fungal Chemistry Map Reveals How Trichoderma Could Power Next-Generation Biostimulants</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/fungal-chemistry-map-reveals-how-trichoderma-could-power-next-generation-biostimulants/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Morrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 05:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bacillus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beneficial fungi and bacteria interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biostimulants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fungal metabolomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indole-3-acetic acid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LC-MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metabolomic analysis of Trichoderma species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metabolomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial co-inoculation in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial consortia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial stability in biostimulant formulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular basis of microbial compatibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-species crop bioformulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[next-generation biological crop protectants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant growth promotion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant growth promotion through microbial consortia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhizosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhizosphere microbiome engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sphingolipids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable crop enhancement solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trichoderma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trichoderma biostimulants]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=233638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A South African metabolomics study has mapped the distinct chemical signatures of Trichoderma asperellum and T. harzianum and confirmed their compatibility with a commercial Bacillus consortium, paving the way for chemically standardised multi-microbial biostimulants.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two of agriculture&#8217;s most promising beneficial fungi have just had their chemical secrets laid bare. In a study published in the journal Metabolomics, researchers at the University of Johannesburg, working with colleagues at Omnia Group in South Africa, have produced a detailed metabolomic blueprint of two Trichoderma species and shown that they can coexist peacefully with a commercial Bacillus consortium. The work offers something the biostimulant industry has long lacked: a molecular basis for deciding which microorganisms should be packed together into the next generation of multi-species crop products.</p>
<p>Microbial biostimulants are formulations of beneficial microorganisms that enhance plant growth, nutrient uptake and stress tolerance through biological mechanisms rather than synthetic chemistry. Among the most widely used players are fungi of the genus Trichoderma and spore-forming bacteria of the genus Bacillus. When these organisms are co-inoculated, they can occupy complementary niches in the rhizosphere, the bustling zone of soil surrounding plant roots, potentially improving nutrient solubilisation, microbial persistence and suppression of pathogenic microbes compared with single-species inoculations. But combining microbes is not trivial. Each species carries its own ecological preferences and metabolic activities, and incompatible pairings can destabilise a product during storage or undermine its performance in the field.</p>
<p>The Johannesburg team, led by Thuso Mudau and Fidele Tugizimana, set out to address a stubborn knowledge gap: the metabolic mechanisms that drive synergistic, neutral or antagonistic interactions among beneficial microorganisms remain largely unexplored, which makes it difficult to predict which combinations will work. Their approach combined comparative untargeted metabolomics of two fungal species, Trichoderma asperellum and Trichoderma harzianum, with laboratory compatibility assays against a defined four-strain Bacillus consortium marketed as Bacstim 100, containing B. licheniformis M017, B. licheniformis 1001, B. amyloliquefaciens and B. laterosporus.</p>
<p>The analytical pipeline was rigorous. Metabolites were extracted from powdered fungal biomass using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry grade methanol, chosen for its ability to rapidly quench enzymatic activity while pulling out a broad range of polar and semi-polar compounds. The extracts were separated on an ultra-performance liquid chromatography system coupled to a high-resolution SYNAPT XS mass spectrometer, with data-independent acquisition generating fragmentation spectra for each detected molecule. Nine independent biological replicates were prepared per species, and pooled quality-control samples injected throughout the analytical sequence confirmed that instrument performance remained stable from start to finish.</p>
<p>The statistical analysis told a striking story. Principal component analysis separated the two fungal species cleanly, with the model explaining 84.3 percent of the variation and achieving a predictive capacity of 67.5 percent, both comfortably above accepted thresholds for biological data. A supervised orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis reinforced the separation, and its statistical significance was confirmed by cross-validated analysis of variance with a p-value below 0.0001. Permutation testing found no evidence of model overfitting, and receiver operating characteristic analysis within the cross-validation framework yielded a perfect area under the curve of 1.00, an internal estimate of how reliably the chemical profiles distinguish the two species. In short, despite belonging to the same genus, T. asperellum and T. harzianum carry unmistakably different chemical signatures.</p>
<p>Of the 3,215 molecular features detected across the samples, 42 were putatively annotated at level 2 of the Metabolomics Standards Initiative, meaning they were assigned to compound classes based on spectral matching rather than confirmed with authentic standards. Seventeen of these emerged as key discriminants between the species, falling largely into three functional classes: aromatic amino acids, indole derivatives and lipids. T. asperellum was characterised by elevated levels of tryptophan, phenylalanine, indole-3-lactic acid, indole-3-propanoic acid, sphingosine and phytosphingosine, while T. harzianum accumulated more tyrosine, guanosine, tryptamine and linoleoyl ethanolamide. The pattern suggests two distinct metabolic strategies, with T. asperellum leaning towards lipid-associated chemistry and T. harzianum towards indole and nitrogen-related compounds.</p>
<p>These chemical differences carry potential functional weight. Tryptophan is the biological precursor of indole compounds, including indole-3-acetaldehyde, which can be oxidised to indole-3-acetic acid, the classic plant hormone auxin, by microbial alcohol dehydrogenase enzymes. Auxin production in beneficial microbes is known to promote fungal growth, stimulate spore germination and elongate fungal hyphae, and the enrichment of tryptamine and indole-3-acetaldehyde in T. harzianum hints at enhanced downstream metabolism along this pathway. Meanwhile, the elevated glutamate in T. asperellum and higher arginine in T. harzianum point to divergent nitrogen management, since glutamate can be converted to glutamine as a nitrogen source while arginine serves as a storage and transport molecule. Lipid-derived metabolites such as linoleoyl ethanolamide and 13-oxo-ODE, both polyunsaturated fatty acid derivatives, may influence membrane integrity and stress responses.</p>
<p>Pathway analysis added another layer of insight. Using a hypergeometric enrichment test and relative betweenness centrality as a topology measure, the researchers mapped the annotated metabolites onto fungal metabolic pathways and found significant enrichment in sphingolipid metabolism, purine metabolism, phenylalanine metabolism, the biosynthesis of phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan, ubiquinone and terpenoid-quinone biosynthesis, and tyrosine and tryptophan metabolism. Sphingolipid metabolism showed the most pronounced impact, driven by the elevated sphingosine and phytosphingosine in T. asperellum. These molecules are far from incidental: sphingolipids govern cell division, hyphal formation and spore germination in fungi, and phytosphingosine contributes to membrane stability. The authors suggest that the lipid-rich profile of T. asperellum could confer enhanced membrane stability and adaptive capacity under fluctuating environmental conditions, potentially aiding persistence in the rhizosphere.</p>
<p>The compatibility experiments delivered the study&#8217;s most commercially relevant verdict. In potato dextrose broth, co-cultivation of either fungal species with the Bacillus consortium increased total dry biomass substantially, by 168.4 percent for T. asperellum and 98.6 percent for T. harzianum compared with monocultures, although the researchers are careful to note that this reflects additive growth of two organisms rather than demonstrated synergy, since the individual contributions of each partner were not resolved. Dual culture plate assays showed minimal antagonism: a transient inhibition zone appeared around T. asperellum at day three but vanished by day ten, and no inhibition was observed between T. harzianum and the bacteria on either medium. Fermentation broth tests, in which filtered spent culture fluids from each microbe were tested against the others, confirmed the absence of inhibitory interactions across all pairings. Under the tested conditions, these organisms simply get along.</p>
<p>The implications reach well beyond the laboratory bench. The biostimulant industry faces a persistent constraint: a lack of standardisation in product composition, which makes consistency and quality control difficult. The discriminant metabolites identified here, from tryptophan and sphingosine to tryptamine and linoleoyl ethanolamide, provide candidate chemical markers that could be used to distinguish Trichoderma-based materials, monitor compositional consistency across production batches and support evidence-based strain selection. Such markers would need validation across additional strains, formulations and independent sample sets before deployment, but they represent a concrete step towards chemically defined, quality-assured microbial products.</p>
<p>The authors are equally candid about the limits of their work. Metabolomic profiling was performed on powdered fungal biomass rather than freshly harvested cultures, so processing and storage may have influenced the stability of some metabolites through degradation or oxidation, and the profiles reported represent the chemistry of the stored materials under the conditions investigated. The methanol extraction, while effective for polar and semi-polar compounds, may have missed highly hydrophobic metabolites that complementary biphasic extraction would capture. Pathway mapping relied on an Aspergillus niger reference library because a Trichoderma-specific KEGG library was not available at the time of analysis. And crucially, no plant experiments were conducted, so the proposed links between indole metabolites, lipid profiles and plant growth promotion remain literature-supported hypotheses rather than demonstrated effects.</p>
<p>Future research, the team argues, should integrate metabolomic profiling with controlled plant experiments to test whether the observed chemical differences translate into differential biostimulant effects in living crops. Metabolomic investigation of Trichoderma-Bacillus co-cultures could reveal chemical exchanges invisible when each organism is studied alone, and compatibility studies should standardise inocula by viable cell and spore concentrations rather than mass, employing species-specific quantification to distinguish additive, synergistic and antagonistic responses. If those steps are taken, the chemical blueprint assembled here could become the foundation for rationally designed microbial consortia, products built not on trial and error but on a molecular understanding of who plays well with whom in the underground economy of the rhizosphere.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Comparative metabolomic profiling of Trichoderma species and their compatibility with a Bacillus consortium for microbial biostimulant development</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> The chemical blueprint of Trichoderma for next-generation microbial biostimulants</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Mudau, T., Tshehlane, L. P., Ncube, K. T., &amp; Tugizimana, F. (2026). The chemical blueprint of Trichoderma for next-generation microbial biostimulants. <em>Metabolomics, 22</em>(5), Article 166. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-026-02531-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-026-02531-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-026-02531-4" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11306-026-02531-4</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Trichoderma, Bacillus, metabolomics, biostimulants, rhizosphere, LC-MS, sphingolipids, indole-3-acetic acid, microbial consortia, sustainable agriculture, plant growth promotion, molecular networking</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">233638</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Golden Flower Fungus and Probiotic Bacteria Reshape the Flavor Chemistry of Dark Tea</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/golden-flower-fungus-and-probiotic-bacteria-reshape-the-flavor-chemistry-of-dark-tea/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 16:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bacillus coagulans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catechins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[controlled secondary fermentation in tea production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dark tea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dark tea fermentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of pile fermentation on dark tea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eurotium cristatum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fermentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flavor chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flavor chemistry of fermented teas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation in traditional tea processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liu-Pao tea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metabolomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial community impact on dark tea quality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial influence on flavor development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial strains for standardized tea processing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecule-level analysis of tea aroma and taste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peptides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probiotic bacteria Bacillus coagulans in tea fermentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of golden flower fungus Eurotium cristatum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweet taste receptor]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=230786</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A combined sensory and molecular networking study reveals how two probiotic strains transform the metabolites that make Liu-Pao dark tea sweet, mellow, and aromatic.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dark tea has long been prized for its aged aroma and mellow sweetness, qualities that emerge not from the tea leaf alone but from the invisible labor of microbes during pile fermentation. Among China&#8217;s post-fermented teas, Liu-Pao tea from Guangxi stands out, having been ranked among the country&#8217;s most influential tea brands in 2022. Yet traditional processing, which relies on steaming and natural aging, often produces teas with pale leaves and incomplete flavor development. Modern producers have turned to controlled secondary fermentation, inoculating the tea with defined microbial strains to steer color, aroma, and taste. The catch is consistency: the outcome depends heavily on which microbes dominate the pile, and small shifts in the community can swing quality unpredictably. A new study published in Food Chemistry: X now dissects, molecule by molecule, how two candidate probiotic strains reshape the chemistry of Liu-Pao tea, offering a roadmap for standardized, flavor-optimized production.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Xuechun Wang and Jian-Lin Wu, took a traditional Liu-Pao tea product as its starting material and fermented it further with one of three single strains: the golden flower fungus Eurotium cristatum (strain 8730), and two strains of the probiotic bacterium Bacillus coagulans, designated No. 10059 and JZ-1. Fermentation ran for seven days at 50 degrees Celsius, with leaf piles 80 to 100 centimeters high and moisture contents between roughly 10 and 25 percent. The choice of organisms was deliberate. E. cristatum is famed for the golden flower fungus aroma of brick teas, producing volatile compounds such as methyl salicylate and linalool oxide, while B. coagulans secretes proteases and lipases that can break down proteins and fats into flavor-active fragments. What remained unclear before this study was precisely how each strain drives the formation and transformation of the metabolites behind taste.</p>
<p>The first line of evidence came from human panels. Six trained tasters, working blind with randomly coded samples across three independent sessions, scored the teas on sweetness, umami, bitterness, sourness, astringency, and aged flavor using a ten-point scale under a protocol approved by an ethics committee. The unfermented control scored 5.50 for sweetness and 4.25 for bitterness. After fermentation with B. coagulans No. 10059, bitterness and astringency fell to 3.00 and 3.75 respectively, while the JZ-1 strain produced a more mellow profile with a noticeable cheese-like note. But the standout was E. cristatum: sweetness climbed to 7.50, umami jumped from 1.50 to 3.75, and bitterness dropped to 2.75, yielding the most pronounced mellow-sweet character of all the samples, accompanied by the fungus&#8217;s signature fungal aroma.</p>
<p>Human palates can be subjective, so the team turned to an SA-402B electronic tongue equipped with six lipid-membrane sensors that quantify sourness, bitterness, astringency, umami, saltiness, and sweetness, along with aftertaste attributes. The instrument confirmed the panel&#8217;s verdicts with striking precision. Sweetness values rose from 3.654 in the traditional tea to 4.102 and 4.302 in the two B. coagulans samples, and reached 5.989 in the E. cristatum tea, the highest of all. Bitterness moved in the opposite direction, falling from 3.484 to 2.500 in the fungal sample. Umami intensity increased across all fermented teas, from 2.776 in the control to 4.687 in the E. cristatum product. Sourness, saltiness, and astringency aftertaste registered below their tasteless thresholds and were excluded, leaving sweetness as the single most discriminative taste parameter between strains.</p>
<p>To trace these sensory shifts back to chemistry, the researchers quantified the tea&#8217;s major constituents. Total protein dropped significantly in the B. coagulans teas, most notably with JZ-1, consistent with the bacterium&#8217;s proteolytic enzymes, but rose significantly in the E. cristatum sample, likely reflecting fungal protein secretion and the conversion of insoluble proteins into soluble forms and peptides. Total polyphenols, the most abundant chemical class in the tea, fell significantly in the bacterial fermentations, from about 362 milligrams per gram to roughly 297, while remaining unchanged in the fungal sample. Flavonoids, a polyphenol subclass, trended upward with E. cristatum, and soluble sugar showed no significant change in any group. These bulk measurements hinted that each microbe was running a fundamentally different biochemical program on the same tea base.</p>
<p>The centerpiece of the study was a feature-based molecular networking approach, or FBMN, run on the GNPS platform and coupled to ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. After preprocessing the raw data with MS-DIAL, the team generated a molecular network of 18,342 mass spectral nodes, each representing a detected chemical feature, clustered by spectral similarity and visualized in Cytoscape with pie charts showing each compound&#8217;s abundance across samples. The strategy allowed the researchers to see at a glance which metabolites were associated with which fermentation strain, dramatically accelerating the discovery of microbial-derived compounds that conventional targeted analysis would have missed.</p>
<p>In total, 358 compounds were tentatively identified, including 249 flavonoids, 21 peptides, 6 amino acids, 32 lipids, and 50 alkaloids or nucleosides, with 10 compounds flagged as potentially novel. Among the flavonoids were catechins, flavonol glycosides, biflavonoids, and a distinctive group called flavan-3-ol B-ring fission analogs, or FBRFAs, including teadenol A, planchol A, and fuzhuanin A. The network also revealed a cluster of ethyl-pyrrolidinone-substituted flavonoid alkaloids, the puerins, and led to the characterization of a potential new compound, eps-teadenol, whose fragmentation pattern matched that of known pyrrolidinone-substituted flavan-3-ols. From this cluster, ten previously unreported eps-FBRFAs were tentatively annotated. On the peptide side, the network yielded 16 linear peptides, including the pentapeptide Gly-Pro-Phe-Pro-Leu/Ile, and five indole-containing cyclic dipeptides such as neoechinulin A and echinulin, three of which had never been reported in Liu-Pao tea.</p>
<p>Statistical modeling then separated the strain-specific signatures. Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis identified 71 differential compounds in the E. cristatum tea, 33 up-regulated and 38 down-regulated. Nine FBRFAs and three eps-FBRFAs rose significantly, and the prenylated cyclic peptides neoechinulin A, echinulin, and tardioxopiperazine A surged from trace levels to marked accumulation, a hallmark of fungal secondary metabolism. Critically, non-ester-type catechins such as epicatechin and epigallocatechin increased dramatically while their gallate-esterified counterparts, including EGCG and ECG, declined, suggesting that fungal enzymes hydrolyze esterified catechins into their non-esterified forms. In the B. coagulans teas, the story was proteolytic: 38 differential compounds emerged in the JZ-1 fermentation, 15 of them up-regulated, including four amino acids and eleven peptides, with representative peptides such as Pro-Glu-Val reaching their highest levels in the JZ-1 group.</p>
<p>Linking chemistry back to the palate, redundancy analysis showed that the first two axes explained over 93 percent of the variance in flavor attributes, with sweetness aligning strongly with non-esterified catechins, FBRFAs, and eps-FBRFAs, while bitterness tracked with the ester-type catechins. This fits established taste science: non-ester catechins like EGC and EC contribute to sweet aftertaste, whereas gallated catechins are among the most bitter and astringent compounds in tea. The linear peptides enriched by B. coagulans correlated positively with aged flavor, plausibly explaining the bacterial teas&#8217; deeper aged character. Pushing the mechanistic question further, the team docked twelve FBRFAs and eps-FBRFAs into the Venus flytrap domains of the human sweet taste receptor TAS1R2/TAS1R3, the same pocket that recognizes sucralose. All twelve bound with predicted energies between minus 7.1 and minus 9.0 kilocalories per mole, and eleven contacted key residues including Tyr-103, Asp-142, and Asp-278. The authors are careful to note that docking alone does not prove receptor activation, and functional validation remains to be done.</p>
<p>Finally, the study proposed a biosynthetic route for the eps-FBRFAs, a class reported here for the first time in Liu-Pao tea. The pathway begins with the de-esterification of gallated catechins such as EGCG into non-ester forms, followed by cyclic peroxide formation, meta-cleavage, reduction, oxidation, and lactonization to yield FBRFAs. In parallel, theanine undergoes Strecker degradation to aldehyde intermediates that cyclize into ethyl pyrrolidone, which then conjugates with FBRFAs at the C-8 position. Supporting this route, theanine levels fell most sharply in the E. cristatum fermentation. Because eps-FBRFA enrichment appeared only in the fungal samples despite identical fermentation conditions, the strain itself appears essential to the transformation. Together, the findings give tea producers a molecular toolkit: E. cristatum for sweetness and reduced bitterness, B. coagulans for aged flavor depth, and a validated analytical pipeline for engineering the next generation of fermented teas.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Microbial fermentation and flavor metabolites in Liu-Pao dark tea</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Integrated sensory evaluation and feature-based molecular networking elucidate flavor improvement and associated metabolites in dark tea fermented by Eurotium cristatum and Bacillus coagulans</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Integrated sensory evaluation and feature-based molecular networking elucidate flavor improvement and associated metabolites in dark tea fermented by Eurotium cristatum and Bacillus coagulans. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2026.104544" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2026.104544</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fochx.2026.104544" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.fochx.2026.104544</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> dark tea, Liu-Pao tea, Eurotium cristatum, Bacillus coagulans, fermentation, metabolomics, molecular networking, flavor chemistry, catechins, peptides, sweet taste receptor, food science</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">230786</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mass Spectrometry Map Reveals Hidden Chemical Diversity Across the Cabbage Family</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/mass-spectrometry-map-reveals-hidden-chemical-diversity-across-the-cabbage-family/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 23:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brassicaceae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brassicaceae metabolomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camelina sativa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemical novelty in crucifer species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemotaxonomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comparative plant biochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational annotation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computational annotation in metabolomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hidden chemical diversity in cabbage family]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-resolution Orbitrap mass spectrometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LC-MS/MS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass spectrometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metabolomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phylogenetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant biochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Plant chemical diversity mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant defense chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specialized metabolites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[specialized plant metabolites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standardized metabolite profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sulfur compounds in Brassicaceae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[triterpenoid saponins]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=215200</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A standardized mass-spectrometry survey of fourteen crucifer species reveals that triterpenoid saponins and other specialized metabolites are far more widespread across the Brassicaceae than previously believed.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Plants cannot run from their enemies, so they fight with chemistry. The mustard family, Brassicaceae, is famous for the pungent sulfur compounds that give mustard, cabbage, and wasabi their bite, but those well-known defenses are only the visible tip of an enormous biochemical iceberg. A new study published in the journal Metabolomics has now mapped the specialized metabolites of fourteen crucifer species in a single, standardized framework, revealing hotspots of chemical novelty that had never been systematically compared before. Led by Felicia C. Wolters of Wageningen University &amp; Research, together with colleagues including Marnix Medema, Klaas Bouwmeester, and Justin van der Hooft, the work combines liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry with a battery of computational annotation tools to ask a deceptively simple question: which chemicals do all these related plants share, and which are unique?</p>
<p>The scale of the undertaking is what sets it apart. The team grew fourteen species under tightly controlled greenhouse conditions, harvested both leaf and root tissue at the same developmental stage and time of day, and extracted metabolites using a single, reproducible protocol. Each batch was then run on the same high-resolution Orbitrap mass spectrometer in both positive and negative ionization modes, capturing semi-polar to moderately polar compounds across a mass range of roughly 90 to 1350 daltons. From the raw spectra, the researchers extracted 7,683 mass features in positive mode and 6,433 in negative mode using the software mzmine. Mass features are the detectable ionic fingerprints of individual compounds in a complex mixture, and aligning them across species is the foundation of any comparative metabolomics study.</p>
<p>Extracting features, however, is only half the battle. The central challenge of untargeted metabolomics is that most detected features cannot be matched to known compounds in spectral libraries, and different computational tools often disagree. To overcome this, the team built a consensus annotation pipeline that integrates several state-of-the-art in silico tools: SIRIUS with CANOPUS for molecular formula and chemical class prediction, MS2Query for spectral analogue searching, and the deep-learning tool DreaMS queried against the MassSpecGym library. Only features whose compound class annotations agreed across multiple tools were retained, yielding 5,118 consistently annotated features in positive mode and 2,542 in negative mode. Chemical classes were assigned using the NP.Classifier ontology, a deep-learning-based classification system for natural products. This consensus approach does not deliver unambiguous structural proof, the authors caution, but it makes chemical ontology assignments considerably more reliable than any single tool alone.</p>
<p>With the annotated dataset in hand, the researchers could define what they call the core metabolome of the family. The Brassicaceae phylogeny was recently revised into two subfamilies and five supertribes, and the study focused on the two largest, Camelinodae and Brassicodae, with the early-diverging species Aethionema arabicum as an outgroup. The results showed that only a small fraction of the chemical space is truly conserved: just 2.9 percent of annotated features in positive mode and 1.5 percent in negative mode were shared across all fourteen species. In contrast, the two supertribes shared 13 percent of features in positive mode and 19.2 percent in negative mode, while species-specific features ranged from 7 to 45 percent of the total fingerprint. Conserved profiles broadly tracked phylogenetic distance, suggesting that chemistry, like genes, carries an evolutionary memory.</p>
<p>The most striking findings came from the chemical mavericks. Camelina sativa, the oilseed crop known as false flax, Capsella rubella, and Barbarea vulgaris, a bitter leafy herb, stood out with exceptionally unique metabolite profiles. In Camelina sativa, unique terpenoid features accounted for 33.5 percent of annotations in positive mode and a remarkable 55.6 percent in negative mode, the largest unique terpenoid profile recorded in the study. Terpenoids are one of the largest and most structurally diverse classes of plant natural products, and their abundance in Camelina hints at biosynthetic pathways that have gone largely unexplored in this crop. The finding could have practical consequences for breeding oilseed crops with enhanced pest resistance or novel nutritional chemistry.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most intriguing discovery concerns triterpenoid saponins, soap-like compounds with a characteristic oleanane-type carbon skeleton. Until now, these molecules were believed to be essentially exclusive to Barbarea vulgaris within the Brassicaceae, where they act as feeding deterrents against the diamondback moth. Using MS2LDA, a topic-modeling approach that extracts recurring fragmentation patterns called Mass2Motifs from tandem mass spectra, the team identified substructure motifs corresponding to oleanane and ursane triterpenoid cores and their conjugated glycosides. These motifs were detected not only in Barbarea but across leaf and root tissue of five Camelinodae species, in Brassica carinata, and even in the outgroup Aethionema arabicum. Characteristic fragment peaks at mass-to-charge ratios of 439.36, 119.09, and 105.07, matching library spectra of oleanolic acid, appeared in species where such saponins had never been reported before.</p>
<p>The authors are careful about interpretation. Some of the glycosylation-related fragmentation patterns required careful scrutiny because in-source fragmentation, in which molecules break apart inside the instrument before mass analysis, can masquerade as genuine sugar-loss signatures. Molecular families with highly similar retention times flagged this phenomenon in the Camelina data. Nevertheless, the convergence of multiple independent lines of evidence, including compound class predictions, spectral library matches, and substructure motifs, makes a compelling case that triterpenoid saponin-like chemistry is far more widespread in the crucifer family than decades of targeted phytochemistry had suggested. The result is a textbook example of how untargeted, computationally guided approaches can overturn long-held assumptions about the distribution of natural products.</p>
<p>The study also probed alkaloids, finding that tryptophan-derived alkaloid annotations were enriched across all species, while anthracillic acid alkaloids were particularly abundant in Isatis tinctoria, the historic dye plant woad, and ornithine alkaloids dominated in Aethionema arabicum. Molecular networking further suggested the presence of the phytoalexin camalexin, previously known mainly from Arabidopsis thaliana and Camelina, in the root tissue of Capsella rubella. Indole ring substructure motifs were widely distributed through the network, and the researchers propose systematically fingerprinting closely related species in the Arabidopsidae and Camelinae tribes to determine how specific camalexin production really is within the supertribe.</p>
<p>To test whether chemistry can reconstruct evolution, the team extended the analysis to seventeen species by integrating a second batch of LC-MS/MS data using the MS-Cluster algorithm, which computes consensus spectra while ignoring retention time shifts between batches. After filtering for high-confidence structural annotations from SIRIUS, 895 unique structures remained. Hierarchical clustering of these annotations, combining leaf and root profiles, largely reproduced the species phylogeny, with Brassicodae and Camelinodae species falling into distinct groups. Notable exceptions were informative: Lepidium sativum consistently grouped with Isatis tinctoria, hinting at phytochemical relatedness within the Lepidae tribe, while Camelina sativa persistently appeared as an outgroup in every clustering scenario, an enigma the authors suggest could be resolved by sampling more Camelinodae species. Tissue-specific clustering also revealed that leaf and root profiles can be conserved to different degrees, consistent with the idea that different organs face different selective pressures from herbivores, pathogens, and microbes.</p>
<p>Beyond its specific findings, the study offers a blueprint. The authors argue that current estimates of the total number of unique plant compounds are extrapolated from a biased sample of species and ignore phylogenetic distance, and they advocate clade-wide, standardized metabolic fingerprinting to correct this bias. Because specialized metabolites are often stress-induced, they note that a single snapshot under benign growth conditions inevitably underestimates the biochemical repertoire, and future designs should systematically elicit hormone-mediated stress responses. The modular pipeline, from growth chamber to consensus annotation, is extendable to other plant families, and all data have been deposited in public repositories including MetaboLights and MassIVE. For a family that supplies much of the world&#8217;s vegetables, oils, and model organisms, the message is clear: the chemical frontier of the Brassicaceae is far wider, and far stranger, than anyone had measured.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Comparative metabolomic fingerprinting of specialized metabolite diversity across Brassicaceae species</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Systematic mass-spectrometry-guided metabolic fingerprinting elucidates diversity of specialized metabolites across the Brassicaceae</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Wolters, F. C., Woldu, T., Schranz, M. E., Medema, M. H., Bouwmeester, K., &amp; van der Hooft, J. J. J. (2026). Systematic mass-spectrometry-guided metabolic fingerprinting elucidates diversity of specialized metabolites across the Brassicaceae. <em>Metabolomics, 22</em>(5), Article 161. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-026-02537-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-026-02537-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-026-02537-y" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11306-026-02537-y</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Brassicaceae, metabolomics, mass spectrometry, specialized metabolites, triterpenoid saponins, chemotaxonomy, LC-MS/MS, molecular networking, Camelina sativa, plant biochemistry, computational annotation, phylogenetics</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">215200</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists Decipher the Chemical Language Spoken by Soil Bacillus Communities</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/scientists-decipher-the-chemical-language-spoken-by-soil-bacillus-communities/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgan Morrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 22:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[agricultural biostimulant formulation design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bacillus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biochemical pathways of Bacillus bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biostimulants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Machine learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mass spectrometry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metabolites produced by Bacillus for crop growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metabolomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial biostimulant mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial consortia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial consortium interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial metabolomics in sustainable farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular mechanisms of microbial biostimulants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[open-access microbial ecology research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phytohormones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plant-microbe interactions in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rhizosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil Bacillus communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil bacteria chemical communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbiome chemical signaling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=210765</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A computational metabolomics study has mapped the shifting chemical profiles of Bacillus microbial consortia, creating a molecular lexicon that could guide the rational design of agricultural biostimulants.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beneath every healthy field lies a bustling marketplace of chemical signals, where soil bacteria trade molecules that can make or break a crop&#8217;s fortunes. A new open-access study published in the journal Microbial Ecology has now mapped that chemical marketplace in unprecedented detail, charting the metabolites produced by laboratory-cultured consortia of Bacillus bacteria that are used as agricultural biostimulants. The work, led by Musiwalo Samuel Mulaudzi of the Research Centre for Plant Metabolomics at the University of Johannesburg, together with Lerato Pertunia Tshehlane and Fidele Tugizimana, offers a biochemical framework that could guide the rational design of microbial products for sustainable farming.</p>
<p>Microbial biostimulants, formulations of beneficial microorganisms applied to seeds, soils or crops to boost growth and productivity, have gained considerable momentum as an alternative or complement to conventional agrochemicals. Yet a persistent obstacle has dogged the field: the biochemical and molecular mechanisms that govern how these products actually work, and how the different microbes within a consortium interact with one another, remain poorly understood. That knowledge gap, the authors argue, directly limits the design and deployment of effective microbial biostimulants. Their study set out to close it by comprehensively characterizing the metabolomes, the full complements of small molecules, of three microbial consortia formulated from different combinations of six Bacillus species: Bacillus licheniformis, B. laterosporus, B. amyloliquefaciens, B. subtilis, B. pumilus and B. megaterium.</p>
<p>The experimental design was elegantly systematic. Each of the three consortia, designated C1, C2 and C3, was cultured in liquid media, and metabolites were extracted from both the extracellular medium, the molecules the bacteria released into their surroundings, and the intracellular compartment, the chemistry retained inside the cells. Critically, sampling was performed at different stages of bacterial growth, allowing the researchers to capture how the chemical output of each consortium shifts over time rather than relying on a single snapshot. The extracts were then analyzed using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, an analytical technique that separates complex mixtures of molecules and fragments them to reveal their molecular structures with high sensitivity.</p>
<p>Raw mass spectrometry data of this kind are extraordinarily dense, generating thousands of spectral features that no human analyst could interpret feature by feature. To mine this torrent of information, the team turned to two complementary computational strategies. The first was molecular networking, a technique that organizes mass spectra into visual networks in which structurally related molecules cluster together, making it possible to recognize entire molecular families even when individual compounds cannot be fully identified. The second was machine learning, which was used to interpret the acquired spectral data and to pinpoint the metabolites that most strongly distinguish one consortium, or one growth stage, from another. Statistical tools such as principal component analysis and partial least squares discriminant analysis helped reduce the dimensional complexity of the data and expose the dominant patterns in the chemical landscape.</p>
<p>The results revealed clearly differential metabolite profiles that define the chemical space occupied by each of the three microbial consortia. In other words, mixing the same six bacterial species in different combinations produces measurably different chemical outputs, and the researchers could tell the consortia apart on the basis of their metabolomes alone. Even more striking was the temporal dimension: each consortium showed distinct metabolite profiles at different growth stages, indicating that the chemical conversation among these microbes evolves continuously as the community grows, competes and adapts.</p>
<p>The annotated metabolome was characterized by a remarkably diverse set of molecular families. Among them were amino acids and peptides, the building blocks and signaling molecules of microbial life; antimicrobials, the chemical weapons Bacillus species deploy against competitors, many of which also prime plant immune systems; and phytohormones, plant-like signaling compounds that can directly stimulate root development, stress tolerance and growth. The profiles also contained lipids, organic acids, carbohydrates and pyrimidines, classes of molecules involved in membrane structure, nutrient mobilization, energy metabolism and nucleic acid biology. This breadth of chemistry illustrates why Bacillus consortia are such versatile biostimulants: a single community can simultaneously feed a plant growth signals, shield it from pathogens and unlock soil nutrients.</p>
<p>The concept of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, or PGPR, provides context for these findings. Rhizobacteria colonize the zone of soil surrounding plant roots, the rhizosphere, where they engage in a chemical dialogue with their host. Some molecules induce systemic resistance, effectively vaccinating the plant against attack, while others modulate reactive oxygen species signaling or supply hormones that reshape root architecture. By cataloguing which of these chemical signals each consortium produces and when, the study moves the field closer to understanding not just that biostimulants work, but how they work, and which members of a community contribute which functions.</p>
<p>The authors describe their findings as charting a chemical lexicon of Bacillus consortium metabolism, a vocabulary of metabolites with potential relevance to microbial interactions and plant-associated functions. This lexicon is more than an academic curiosity. Because the mechanism of action of a biostimulant ultimately depends on the molecules it delivers or induces, knowing the chemical repertoire of a consortium allows formulators to make informed choices about which species to combine, in what proportions, and at what point in the production process to harvest the culture. The study&#8217;s findings provide a biochemical framework that may inform the rational design and subsequent experimental validation of microbial biostimulant formulations, replacing today&#8217;s largely empirical trial-and-error approach with one grounded in measurable chemistry.</p>
<p>The methodology itself represents a template for future work in microbial ecology. By combining controlled consortium cultivation with staged sampling of both extracellular and intracellular chemistry, high-resolution mass spectrometry, molecular networking and machine learning, the workflow extracts mechanistic insight from data that would otherwise remain an undifferentiated mass of peaks. The integration of knowledgebases and network-based annotation further strengthens confidence in the metabolite identifications, while quality control procedures guard against analytical drift across the many samples involved. As such multi-omics and computational approaches become standard, the prospect of designing microbial communities with prescribed chemical functions moves from speculation toward engineering practice.</p>
<p>The broader stakes extend well beyond the laboratory. Agriculture faces the twin pressures of feeding a growing population and reducing its environmental footprint, and microbial biostimulants are widely seen as a key tool for reconciling the two. The authors explicitly connect their work to the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, particularly zero hunger and climate action, noting that more effective and better-understood biostimulants can support both food security and more sustainable farming systems. Published on 23 September 2026 in Microbial Ecology, the open-access study by Mulaudzi, Tshehlane and Tugizimana demonstrates that the chemical language of soil bacteria, long a black box, can now be systematically read, and that learning to speak it fluently may transform how humanity nurtures its crops.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Metabolomic mapping of Bacillus bacterial consortia for microbial biostimulant design</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Mapping the Chemical Language of Bacillus Consortia: Toward the Rational Design of Microbial Biostimulants</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Mulaudzi, M. S., Tshehlane, L. P., &amp; Tugizimana, F. (2026). Mapping the Chemical Language of Bacillus Consortia: Toward the Rational Design of Microbial Biostimulants. <em>Microbial Ecology</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-026-02885-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-026-02885-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-026-02885-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s00248-026-02885-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> microbial consortia, Bacillus, biostimulants, metabolomics, mass spectrometry, molecular networking, machine learning, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, sustainable agriculture, phytohormones, rhizosphere, Microbial Ecology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">210765</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
