<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>molecular mobility &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/molecular-mobility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 18:19:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Needle-Tipped Magnet Reveals Hidden Molecular Traffic Jams Inside Teflon Films</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/needle-tipped-magnet-reveals-hidden-molecular-traffic-jams-inside-teflon-films/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bethany Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 18:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloch-Torrey equation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPMG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ferromagnetic needle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hidden heterogeneity in polymers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative methods for studying polymer heterogeneity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interfacial dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[layer-by-layer analysis of polymer films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic resonance imaging of Teflon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnetic resonance mapping of solid plastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular motion in semicrystalline polymers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nanoscale molecular traffic jams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NMR imaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-invasive polymer characterization techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polymer chain mobility measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polymer diffusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polymer film molecular dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polytetrafluoroethylene molecular diffusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PTFE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semicrystalline polymers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soft-matter physics research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spin-spin relaxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[static magnetic field gradient]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thin films]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=255349</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A low-cost static-gradient NMR imaging technique has revealed that polymer chains in a PTFE film are pinned and immobilized at the glass substrate interface while remaining comparatively mobile at the air-facing surface.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyday materials can behave like two different worlds stacked on top of each other. A polymer film that feels uniform to the touch may, at the molecular level, be a patchwork of fast-moving and nearly frozen regions, depending on whether a chain sits at an open surface or is pinned against a solid wall. Researchers in Japan have now made this hidden heterogeneity directly visible, using a remarkably simple and inexpensive magnetic resonance technique to map, layer by layer, how molecules move through a solid plastic film. The work, published in the journal Magnetic Resonance, offers a fresh window onto one of the most stubborn problems in soft-matter physics: how local environments reshape the dynamics of polymer chains.</p>
<p>The team, led by Natsuki Kawabata and Naoki Asakawa of Gunma University together with Teruo Kanki of Osaka University, focused on polytetrafluoroethylene, the fluorinated polymer better known by the trade name Teflon. PTFE is famously slippery and chemically inert, but it is also a demanding test case for any measurement technique. It is a semicrystalline solid, roughly ninety percent crystalline by volume, and its molecules diffuse so slowly that conventional nuclear magnetic resonance methods struggle to detect their motion at all. Standard pulsed-gradient spin-echo NMR, the workhorse of diffusion measurements, relies on switching strong magnetic field gradients on and off, and the gradients achievable in typical laboratory setups are simply too weak to encode the vanishingly small displacements that polymer chains in a solid film actually make.</p>
<p>The researchers sidestepped this limitation with an approach built on static magnetic field gradients rather than pulsed ones. At the heart of their apparatus sits an iron needle with a tip just 0.2 millimeters across, magnetized by direct contact with a small spherical neodymium magnet. Placed between the poles of a water-cooled electromagnet, the needle becomes a localized ferromagnet that generates a steep, continuously present field gradient across the sample. Because the gradient is static, there are no pulsed gradient coils to switch, no eddy currents to wait out, and no need for the cryogenic infrastructure of a superconducting magnet. The entire setup is compact, low-cost, and well suited to solid specimens that conventional MRI hardware handles poorly.</p>
<p>The imaging principle is elegantly indirect. The resonance frequency is held fixed while a spatially selective radiofrequency pulse excites nuclear spins only within a narrow slice, which the authors call the NMR-active slice, whose position is dictated by the local field gradient at that frequency. By stepping the electromagnet&#8217;s field strength up and down, the team slides this sensitive slice through the thickness of the film, one shallow layer at a time. The strategy echoes the sensitive-volume translation long used in oil-well logging NMR, but here it is applied to a polymer film resting on a glass slide, giving a one-dimensional depth profile of molecular dynamics with sub-millimeter spatial resolution. The film they studied was two millimeters thick, glued to soda-lime glass with epoxy resin, so one face breathed air while the other was locked to the substrate.</p>
<p>What the team measured was the spin-spin relaxation rate, known as R2, of fluorine-19 nuclei, using the Carr-Purcell-Meiboom-Gill echo sequence. The clever twist lies in how R2 depends on the echo time. By systematically varying the half echo time tau between twenty and one hundred microseconds, the researchers could probe how translational diffusion contributes to the decay of the signal. Because PTFE is so highly crystalline, the strong fluorine-fluorine dipolar interactions in the crystalline lamellae kill the signal almost instantly; the echoes that survive come almost entirely from the amorphous regions sandwiched between crystalline grains. In other words, the experiment selectively listens to the rubbery molecular corridors threading through a rigid crystalline scaffold, where chains are mobile but confined by their surroundings.</p>
<p>The depth profiles revealed a striking asymmetry. Near the air-facing surface, R2 barely changed as the echo time varied, and its value sat below that of the film interior, a difference the authors attribute not to diffusion but to an enhanced zero-frequency component of the spectral density function, reflecting faster reorientational motion at the free surface. The interior of the film behaved similarly, with relaxation rates insensitive to echo time. But at the glass-side interface, the picture changed dramatically. As tau increased from twenty to thirty microseconds, R2 near the substrate rose; then, at forty and fifty microseconds, it fell sharply. That rise-and-fall signature, absent everywhere else in the film, marks a transition between distinct diffusion regimes and pointed to something unusual happening where polymer meets glue and glass.</p>
<p>To interpret the data, the team turned to the Bloch-Torrey equation, which marries the classical physics of nuclear spin relaxation with Fickian diffusion. Their numerical simulations, performed in a compartmentalized geometry that mimics polymer chains caged between crystalline domains, revealed three characteristic regimes. When the echo time is short, spins diffuse freely without reaching a barrier, and relaxation is unaffected. At intermediate times, spins enter a localization regime, bumping against diffusion barriers but not crossing them. At long times, molecules make repeated round trips between barriers, and the resulting motional averaging makes the system appear stationary, driving the diffusion contribution to R2 back down. The position of the transition between these regimes depends on a dimensionless parameter combining the diffusion coefficient, the echo time, and the distance between barriers, so watching the transition move with tau reveals how far molecules can actually roam.</p>
<p>Applying this framework to the substrate interface, the researchers concluded that the effective diffusion distance shrinks near the glass. Two explanations were possible: a stronger local field gradient caused by magnetic susceptibility contrast at the epoxy interface, or genuine physical pinning of the PTFE chains. The data favored pinning. A stronger gradient alone would shift the regime transition to longer times in a way that a modest increase in tau could not cross, yet the experiment showed exactly such a crossing. The most likely mechanism, the authors argue, is that interactions between the epoxy resin and the PTFE molecules anchor the chains at the interface, shortening the distance between diffusion barriers and compressing the molecular freedom of the amorphous regions. The air side, by contrast, behaves like a free end, with surface energy effects leaving translational dynamics essentially equivalent to the bulk.</p>
<p>The findings carry weight beyond fluoropolymers. Interfacial dynamics govern phenomena from the glass transition in thin films to the performance of coatings, membranes, and adhesives, and decades of work have established that free surfaces and substrate interfaces can shift molecular mobility in opposite directions. Interestingly, the enhanced surface mobility inferred here differs from classic glassy-polymer results in an important way: the measurements were made well above the glass transition, in the rubbery state, and the earlier spin-lattice relaxation data from the same group had shown no difference between the two interfaces, presumably because R1 senses reorientation rather than translation. The new R2 dispersion method fills that gap, and the authors are candid about its limits: the local gradient inside the sample is not known precisely enough to extract absolute diffusion coefficients, so the analysis remains qualitative, and the observed interfacial layers are broadened by fluorine spin diffusion and by the point spread function of the imaging method itself.</p>
<p>Even so, the demonstration stands as a proof of concept for a new class of accessible experiments. A needle, a small permanent magnet, and a benchtop electromagnet together achieve what once demanded superconducting fringe fields or elaborate gradient hardware, and the authors suggest that inverse-problem reconstruction techniques such as Landweber iteration could sharpen the blurred depth profiles in future work. As a low-cost, nondestructive probe of nanoscale dynamical heterogeneity in semicrystalline solids, static-gradient NMR imaging opens the door to routine depth-resolved studies of the molecular traffic jams that quietly determine how tough, flexible, or durable a polymer material turns out to be.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Depth-resolved molecular diffusion in semicrystalline PTFE films measured by static-gradient NMR imaging</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Static-gradient NMR imaging for depth-resolved molecular diffusion in amorphous regions in semicrystalline poly(tetrafluoroethylene) film</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kawabata, N., Asakawa, N., &amp; Kanki, T. (2025). Static-gradient NMR imaging for depth-resolved molecular diffusion in amorphous regions in semicrystalline poly(tetrafluoroethylene) film. <em>Magnetic Resonance, 6</em>(2), 317-329. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-6-317-2025" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-6-317-2025</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/mr-6-317-2025" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.5194/mr-6-317-2025</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> NMR imaging, PTFE, polymer diffusion, static magnetic field gradient, spin-spin relaxation, Bloch-Torrey equation, interfacial dynamics, semicrystalline polymers, CPMG, molecular mobility, thin films, ferromagnetic needle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">255349</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glassy Shields Keep Freeze-Dried Probiotics Alive, Study Finds</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/glassy-shields-keep-freeze-dried-probiotics-alive-study-finds/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 01:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crystalline structure in probiotic powders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[differential scanning calorimetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Food Science and Biotechnology research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeze-dried probiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freeze-drying]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freezing protocols impact on probiotic viability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glass transition temperature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glassy protective matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[influence of glassy vs crystalline matrices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inulin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lactose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lactose and inulin effects on probiotic preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leuconostoc mesenteroides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial viability in fermented foods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physical architecture of probiotic powders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[probiotics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shelf-life of probiotic products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water plasticization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water-induced molecular mobility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whey protein isolate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[whey protein isolate in probiotic stability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WLF model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-ray diffraction]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=220722</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A South Korean study shows that glassy, inulin-based whey protein matrices dramatically outperform crystalline ones in preserving freeze-dried Leuconostoc mesenteroides by suppressing water-induced molecular mobility.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Freeze-dried probiotics live or die by the microscopic architecture of the powder that surrounds them. A new study from researchers at Konkuk University, Kangwon National University, and collaborators in South Korea shows that whether the protective matrix around the cells is glassy or crystalline, and how quickly it succumbs to water-induced molecular mobility, can make the difference between losing half a log of viable bacteria and losing nearly two and a half. The work, published in Food Science and Biotechnology, offers a physically grounded explanation for why some probiotic powders survive months on a shelf while others quietly collapse.</p>
<p>The team, led by Sejun Park and corresponding author Mi-Jung Choi, used Leuconostoc mesenteroides, a lactic acid bacterium common in fermented foods, embedded in matrices built from whey protein isolate combined with either lactose or inulin. Whey protein isolate provides a protein scaffold, but the carbohydrate component determines much of the matrix&#8217;s thermal and hygroscopic behavior. The researchers deliberately manipulated how the samples were frozen before freeze-drying, because the freezing step sets the physical state of the solid matrix that will ultimately shelter the cells.</p>
<p>Two freezing protocols were compared. In the first, samples were plunged directly to −100°C in a single step. In the second, a two-step protocol first held the samples at −5°C, a temperature that encourages ice nucleation and slow crystal growth, before finishing at −100°C. In some experiments the nucleation step was seeded to control when ice crystals formed. X-ray diffraction and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy then revealed what each treatment had wrought: unseeded one-step freezing produced predominantly amorphous matrices, disordered solids in which molecules are frozen in place like a snapshot of the liquid state, whereas seeded two-step freezing produced matrices with clear crystalline features and a higher degree of molecular organization.</p>
<p>That distinction matters because amorphous and crystalline solids behave very differently toward water. Differential scanning calorimetry measured the glass transition temperature, the threshold at which an amorphous solid softens from a rigid glass into a rubbery, mobile state. Water sorption experiments tracked how much moisture each matrix absorbed at different relative humidities, and Gordon–Taylor analysis quantified how strongly that absorbed water depressed the glass transition temperature. Water is a notorious plasticizer: even small amounts slip between macromolecules, lowering the transition temperature and unlocking molecular motion that was previously locked out by the glass.</p>
<p>The carbohydrate identity proved decisive here. Lactose-based matrices were far more sensitive to water-induced glass transition depression, sagging toward rubbery behavior at comparatively modest moisture gains. Inulin-based matrices, by contrast, retained their glass transition temperature much more effectively and showed lower plasticization. Inulin, a longer-chain fructose polymer, simply holds its glassy character better in the presence of water, a property that has been exploited in other dried food and pharmaceutical systems but is now quantified here in the specific context of probiotic preservation with whey protein isolate.</p>
<p>The consequences for the bacteria were stark. Immediately after freeze-drying, cells housed in glassy matrices had lost only 0.50 to 0.70 log units of viability, while cells in crystalline matrices lost 2.48 to 2.65 log units, a difference of roughly two orders of magnitude in surviving colony-forming units. The crystallization process itself appears to be the culprit: as the matrix organizes into crystals, it expels and concentrates solutes, generates mechanical stresses, and strips away the intimate molecular contact that sugars and proteins need to stabilize bacterial membranes and proteins during drying. A crystal lattice, however orderly, is a poor bodyguard.</p>
<p>Storage told a parallel story. Over the storage period, glassy matrices continued to protect their cargo, with viability losses of only 0.41 to 0.77 log units, whereas crystalline matrices shed another 1.71 to 1.87 log units. The mechanism linking these numbers is molecular mobility. When absorbed water depresses the glass transition temperature toward or below the storage temperature, the matrix enters a rubbery regime in which molecules can diffuse, rearrange, and collide. In that regime, damaging reactions accelerate, and the physical barriers that immobilize and shield bacterial cells break down. The Williams–Landel–Ferry equation, a standard model for how relaxation times accelerate as temperature rises above the glass transition, connected the measured transition depressions directly to the observed inactivation rates.</p>
<p>What makes the study technically notable is that it treats the freezing protocol, the carbohydrate chemistry, and the storage environment as one coupled system rather than isolated variables. The degree of crystallinity imprinted during freezing determines the initial physical state; the carbohydrate type determines how fast that state degrades under humidity; and the WLF framework ties the resulting molecular mobility to bacterial death. This chain of causation gives formulators a set of levers: freeze in a way that preserves the amorphous glass, choose carbohydrates such as inulin that resist water plasticization, and package to keep moisture out, and the same probiotic strain can be expected to survive dramatically longer.</p>
<p>The findings arrive at a moment when probiotic powders, functional foods, and microbiome therapies are a fast-growing market, and shelf stability remains a persistent bottleneck. Live bacteria are fragile cargo, and the industry has long relied on empirical trial and error to find protective formulations. By showing that the glassy state, quantified through calorimetry, sorption isotherms, and spectroscopy, is a predictive criterion for both drying survival and storage survival, the Konkuk team adds rigor to what has often been craft knowledge. The work also echoes and extends earlier observations that dried bacterial cells survive in proportion to how deeply their surroundings are locked below the glass transition.</p>
<p>There are, of course, practical caveats. The study examined one organism and one protein-carbohydrate platform, and real products face fluctuating temperatures and humidities that no single isotherm can capture. Crystalline matrices, for all their poor performance here, may offer advantages in other contexts, such as controlled release or reduced hygroscopicity. But the central message is hard to escape: for freeze-dried probiotics, the enemy is not cold or vacuum but mobility, and mobility is water&#8217;s gift. Keep the matrix glassy, keep it dry, and the bacteria keep their count. The research was supported by the Basic Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Education.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Stability of freeze-dried probiotics in whey protein isolate-carbohydrate matrices as governed by matrix physical state and water-induced molecular mobility</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Matrix physical state and water-induced molecular mobility influence the stability of freeze-dried probiotics in whey protein isolate-carbohydrate matrices</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Park, S., Kim, J., Song, H., Kim, S.-H., Jo, Y.-J., &amp; Choi, M.-J. (2026). Matrix physical state and water-induced molecular mobility influence the stability of freeze-dried probiotics in whey protein isolate-carbohydrate matrices. <em>Food Science and Biotechnology</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-026-02315-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-026-02315-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-026-02315-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10068-026-02315-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> freeze-drying, probiotics, glass transition temperature, molecular mobility, whey protein isolate, inulin, lactose, Leuconostoc mesenteroides, water plasticization, X-ray diffraction, differential scanning calorimetry, WLF model</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">220722</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
