<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>molecular ecology &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/molecular-ecology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 21:02:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Ancient DNA From Lake Mud Records 1,000 Years of Human Life and Ecological Change</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/ancient-dna-from-lake-mud-records-1000-years-of-human-life-and-ecological-change/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabrielle Wells]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 21:02:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[000-year human land use record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ancient DNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ancient DNA and Anthropocene debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ancient environmental DNA analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthropocene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capture enrichment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crawford Lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecological change in Ontario lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental DNA sequencing in lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eutrophication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of human activity on lake ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indigenous agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lake Crawford ecological history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lake mud as ecological and human history record]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meromictic lake]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meromictic lake sediment preservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[multi-kingdom ancient DNA study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[palaeoecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sedaDNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sediment DNA as environmental archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sedimentary ancient DNA reconstruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Three Sisters]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=198588</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Scientists used sedimentary ancient DNA from Crawford Lake to reconstruct 1,000 years of ecological change and human activity, revealing Indigenous farming, colonial land use, and industrial impacts.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the bottom of a small lake in Ontario, Canada, lies one of the most precise environmental archives on Earth, and scientists have now read a full millennium of its contents using fragments of genetic material too small to see with the naked eye. An international team of researchers, including faculty at Binghamton University, has reconstructed a 1,000-year timeline of ecological change and human activity at Crawford Lake, the site that rose to global fame during the scientific debate over the proposed Anthropocene epoch. By extracting and sequencing sedimentary ancient DNA, or sedaDNA, preserved in the lakebed, the team assembled a remarkably detailed, multi-kingdom record of the plants, animals, bacteria, and fungi that lived around the water across ten centuries of shifting human land use. The study, published in the journal Molecular Ecology, demonstrates how genetic fragments shed into the environment can transform a bed of lake mud into a continuously updated chronicle of an entire ecosystem.</p>
<p>Crawford Lake owes its extraordinary preservative powers to an unusual physical quirk. It is a meromictic lake, meaning its water column never fully mixes with the lakebed. Because the deep waters remain undisturbed, sediment settling from the surface is laid down in neat, alternating layers of calcite and organic-rich laminae, each pair representing a single year of deposition. Matthew Emery, co-first author of the study and assistant professor of anthropology at Binghamton University, compared the structure to the growth rings of a tree. Like those rings, each sediment layer can be dated to a specific year, offering an exceptionally well-preserved, year-by-year account of environmental change. That annual resolution, combined with the lake&#8217;s status as one of the most intensively studied lakes in the world, gave the sedaDNA team an unparalleled opportunity to test their methods against decades of established palaeoecological evidence.</p>
<p>The technique at the heart of the study descends from methods originally developed to hunt far older quarry. Researchers used capture enrichment, a process in which genetic baits made of RNA are designed to bind to the DNA of target species if those genetic fragments are present in a sample. The RNA baits also attach to magnetic beads, allowing scientists to literally reel in their target DNA with a magnet. Emery noted that these approaches were first engineered to chase down extinct Pleistocene megafauna and extinct hominin relatives such as Neanderthals and Denisovans. Now, they are being applied to lake mud to trace human-environment interactions spanning recent centuries and reaching deep into geological time. Bait sets can be combined to target hundreds or even thousands of species genomes simultaneously, making the approach far more efficient than random shotgun sequencing, and allowing researchers to choose in advance which organisms they want to search for in the archive.</p>
<p>The reconstructed timeline traces a dramatic arc of human influence. In the period before local agriculture, the sedaDNA records a landscape shaped only by natural processes. Between the 1200s and the 1500s, the genetic evidence confirms the presence of Indigenous peoples farming maize and sunflowers near the lake, a finding that aligns with archaeological evidence of Longhouse Peoples villages at the site. The data also captures site abandonment and the ecological succession that followed, and then documents the Euro-Canadian period, with renewed impacts from logging, lumbering, milling, and farming, culminating in the unmistakable global markers of industrialization in the upper layers, including fossil fuel remnants, plastics, artificial fertilizers, acid rain, and even plutonium. It was precisely this well-preserved contamination record that made Crawford Lake a leading candidate among geologists supporting the Anthropocene as a new geological epoch, a designation that was ultimately rejected even as the scientific debate continues.</p>
<p>Among the study&#8217;s most striking results is the recovery of genetic evidence invisible to traditional palaeoecological techniques. Cattle DNA appears in sediments dating to the early 1800s, providing new proof of cattle in the surrounding landscape that left no trace in the fossil or pollen record. Even more remarkably, the analysis detected two of the so-called Four Sisters crops, maize and sunflower, directly from lake core samples for the first time. Three Sisters agriculture is an Indigenous farming technique introduced to the Great Lakes region during the Late Woodland Period, roughly 1000 to 1650 CE, in which maize, beans, and squash are planted side by side in mutually beneficial combinations. When sunflower is added, the grouping becomes the Four Sisters. While fossil and pollen studies had previously confirmed beans and squash at the Crawford Lake village site, those two crops were absent from the lake sediments, a puzzle the researchers attribute to the dietary preferences of an unexpected intermediary.</p>
<p>That intermediary is the Canada goose. The sedaDNA record shows a sharp increase in Canada goose DNA during the periods of Indigenous agriculture, a pattern consistent with geese foraging in cultivated maize and sunflower fields and then roosting on Crawford Lake. Their droppings would have carried both nutrients and traces of the crops they had eaten into the water, likely driving repeated algal blooms from nutrient influxes that are also visible in the sedimentary genetic record. These eutrophication events, caused by excess nutrients in the water, may even have contributed to the abandonment of the site, which occurred on more than one occasion according to the timeline. After abandonment in the 1500s, the lake&#8217;s ecology gradually rebounded, with the record showing a return of pine trees, rabbits, deer, beavers, and loons, and a notable disappearance of maize. Today, similar blooms are more often driven by artificial fertilizers, but the Crawford Lake record shows that nutrient-driven algal booms have deep human roots.</p>
<p>The study also delivered surprises about the physics of DNA decay itself. One of the biggest revelations, according to co-first author Tyler Murchie, lead scientist of Biodiversity Genomics: Ancient DNA at the Hakai Institute and adjunct assistant professor of anthropology at McMaster University, is that older DNA is not necessarily more damaged. Some of the roughly 500-year-old lake sedaDNA from plants and animals at Crawford Lake proved more degraded than DNA tens to hundreds of thousands of years old recovered from permafrost sites in northwestern Canada, demonstrating that preservation conditions matter far more than age alone. The chemistry of a burial environment, whether frozen, waterlogged, mineral-rich, or oxygenated, can determine whether genetic fragments survive intact for millennia or crumble into unreadable noise within a few centuries. For a small lake in southern Ontario, the cold, still, stratified water column turned out to be an unexpectedly generous custodian of molecular history.</p>
<p>The research was not without technical limitations, and the team has been candid about them. The bait set used in the analysis, the PaleoChip Arctic v1.0, was designed for Pleistocene and early Holocene sites far older than the period of human activity at Crawford Lake, and the absence of beans and squash in the results may reflect a gap in that panel or the geese&#8217;s preference for maize and sunflower. The researchers are already working to improve their bait sets for better capture enrichment, with Murchie emphasizing the need for an Eastern Woodland panel for future targeted ancient DNA research in the region. The effort has momentum behind it: in January, co-senior author Hendrik Poinar, professor of anthropology at McMaster University, and Murchie received an NSERC Alliance grant to develop improved sedaDNA methods for permafrost and marine sediments, support the reconstruction of long-term terrestrial and marine ecosystem dynamics, and build the Canadian Ancient DNA Network.</p>
<p>Beyond its technical achievements, the study underscores the collaborative nature of modern environmental science. Poinar noted that the work was only possible through the combination of genetics, archaeology, traditional Indigenous knowledge, lake chemistry, and geochemistry, disciplines that together make the unknown a little more tangible and the past recoverable, almost like magic. The international team included scientists from McMaster University, the Hakai Institute, Brock University, the University of Alberta, and the University of British Columbia in Canada; Binghamton University and Arizona State University in the United States; and Stockholm University in Sweden. Emery described the layered sediment as a filing cabinet and a time capsule, each stratum holding the plants and animals that lived around the lake when it formed, readable straight down through the centuries as long as nothing has shuffled the order. As the debate over the Anthropocene continues, Crawford Lake&#8217;s genetic archive now offers a thousand-year benchmark against which humanity&#8217;s accelerating transformation of the natural world can be measured, one annual layer at a time.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Sedimentary ancient DNA analysis reconstructing 1,000 years of human-environment interactions at Crawford Lake, Ontario</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Ancient DNA reveals 1,000 years of human–environment interactions at Crawford Lake</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ancient DNA reveals 1,000 years of human–environment interactions at Crawford Lake. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1143498" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> ancient DNA, sedaDNA, Crawford Lake, Anthropocene, Indigenous agriculture, Three Sisters, eutrophication, capture enrichment, molecular ecology, palaeoecology, meromictic lake, environmental change</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">198588</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>DNA Hints at Hidden Diversity in a Declining South Asian Frog</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/dna-hints-at-hidden-diversity-in-a-declining-south-asian-frog/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[16S rRNA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMOVA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amphibian biodiversity assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amphibian conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[color polymorphism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptic amphibian diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptic species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryptic species identification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA analysis of frog populations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[frog color morphotypes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetic diversity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic diversity in declining species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global amphibian conservation efforts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitat degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[habitat-specific frog genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of habitat degradation on amphibians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular techniques in herpetology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phylogenetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAG-1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Asia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Asian amphibian decline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Asian frog conservation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sphaerotheca maskeyi]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=196135</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new genetic study of the cryptic South Asian frog Sphaerotheca maskeyi finds high within-population diversity, no significant divergence between its color forms, and subtle signs of erosion in degraded habitats.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Across the flooded fields and scrubby foothills of South Asia lives a frog that most people, including many biologists, would struggle to tell apart from its close relatives. The burrowing frog Sphaerotheca maskeyi, a medium-sized member of the family Dicroglossidae, is a master of anonymity: its external appearance varies so subtly that field researchers have long puzzled over whether the animals they catch represent one population, several, or something more. Now, a new genetic study has peered beneath the skin of this cryptic amphibian, using DNA to map how its diversity is distributed across different habitats and across two distinct color forms, and the results carry important implications for how this declining species should be conserved.</p>
<p>The research, conducted by an international team of scientists working at Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi in Pakistan, Nanjing Forestry University in China, and Purdue University in the United States, set out to answer three fundamental questions. First, where does S. maskeyi sit on the amphibian tree of life? Second, does the genetic makeup of its populations differ between natural and degraded habitats? And third, do the two recognized morphotypes of the species, known as the dotted form and the rusty form, represent genetically distinct lineages? To answer these questions, the team sequenced two widely used genetic markers: a segment of the mitochondrial 16S ribosomal RNA gene, which accumulates mutations quickly and is a workhorse for species-level identification, and a portion of the nuclear RAG-1 gene, which evolves more slowly and provides an independent check on mitochondrial results.</p>
<p>The phylogenetic analyses left little room for doubt about species identity. Using both maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference, two complementary statistical frameworks for reconstructing evolutionary trees, the researchers found that every sampled individual clustered firmly within the Sphaerotheca maskeyi clade, clearly separated from other species in the genus. This matters because cryptic morphology often hides cryptic species, and misidentification in the field can quietly corrupt decades of ecological data. By anchoring the species&#8217; genetic identity with two independent markers, the study provides a reliable baseline for all future work on this frog, from population monitoring to taxonomic revision.</p>
<p>The habitat comparison revealed a pattern that is both encouraging and cautionary. Frogs captured in natural habitats showed numerically higher genetic diversity than those from degraded environments. For the mitochondrial 16S marker, natural-habitat populations displayed haplotype diversity of 0.963 and nucleotide diversity of 0.063, compared with 0.760 and 0.054 in degraded habitats. The nuclear RAG-1 gene told a similar story, with haplotype diversity of 0.9818 and nucleotide diversity of 0.0237 in natural settings versus 0.9556 and 0.0175 in degraded ones. Yet when the team ran formal statistical tests, these differences fell short of significance. The pattern is consistent with the idea that habitat degradation erodes genetic variation, a phenomenon documented in many amphibians, but the sample sizes in this study were not sufficient to prove it conclusively.</p>
<p>One of the most consequential findings came from the analysis of molecular variance, or AMOVA, a technique that partitions genetic variation into components occurring among populations versus within them. For both markers, the vast majority of variation was found within populations rather than between them. In practical terms, this means that individual populations of S. maskeyi are not sharply isolated from one another, at least across the geographic scale sampled. High within-population diversity combined with low among-population differentiation can indicate recent shared ancestry, ongoing or historical gene flow, or simply insufficient time for lineages to diverge. For a species whose global population is trending downward, this connectivity is good news in the short term, because it suggests that local extinctions might still be offset by recolonization from neighboring populations.</p>
<p>The comparison between the two morphotypes produced perhaps the most intriguing result of the study. The rusty form and the dotted form look different enough that researchers routinely sort them in the field, but the genetics suggest that appearance is not destiny. The rusty form showed numerically higher nucleotide diversity at both loci, with values of 0.00210 for 16S rRNA and 0.01258 for RAG-1, against 0.00059 and 0.00517 for the dotted form. Intriguingly, the two forms traded the top spot for haplotype diversity depending on the marker: the dotted form reached 1.000 at 16S while the rusty form hit 1.000 at RAG-1. The AMOVA between morphotypes yielded an FST of 0.09057 with a p-value of 0.058, a figure that sits tantalizingly close to the conventional significance threshold but does not cross it. The authors interpret this as weak genetic structuring with no strong evidence of pronounced divergence between the forms.</p>
<p>This near-miss raises a fascinating evolutionary question: if the two morphotypes are not genetically distinct species or deeply separated lineages, what maintains their visual differences? Color polymorphisms in frogs are often maintained by natural selection, sexual selection, or a balance of the two, and recent research has shown that such polymorphisms can persist for millions of years without accompanying genetic divergence across the rest of the genome. It is entirely possible that the dotted and rusty forms of S. maskeyi represent ecologically or reproductively relevant variants shaped by their environments rather than independently evolving lineages. Testing this hypothesis would require genome-wide markers, larger samples, and behavioral or ecological data linking the morphotypes to differences in survival, mating success, or habitat use.</p>
<p>The conservation stakes of this work are considerable. Genetic diversity is the raw material that allows populations to adapt to changing environments, and its loss often precedes, and predicts, demographic collapse. Species with low genetic diversity are more vulnerable to disease outbreaks, climate extremes, and inbreeding depression, threats that are particularly acute for amphibians, the most imperiled class of vertebrates on Earth. Although S. maskeyi is currently classified as Least Concern by the IUCN Red List, its global population trend is declining, and habitat loss across South Asia continues at a relentless pace. The finding that frogs in degraded habitats carry numerically reduced diversity, even if not yet statistically significant, is a warning sign that should not be ignored.</p>
<p>The study also underscores the value of combining mitochondrial and nuclear markers. Mitochondrial DNA, inherited only through mothers, can be swayed by historical demographic events and female-mediated gene flow, while nuclear genes like RAG-1 reflect the blending of ancestry from both sexes. When both markers agree, as they did here, confidence in the conclusions rises substantially. The sequence data from this study, deposited in GenBank under accession numbers PX645625 through PX645652 for 16S rRNA and PX657352 through PX657361 for RAG-1, will serve as a permanent genetic reference for the species and a foundation for future genomic studies.</p>
<p>For now, the message of this research is one of cautious reassurance paired with urgent vigilance. Sphaerotheca maskeyi still harbors substantial genetic diversity across its range, its populations remain genetically connected, and its two color forms are almost certainly variations on a single evolutionary theme rather than separate species. But declining populations and shrinking habitats are silently chipping away at that diversity, and the statistical trends detected in this study point in the same troubling direction as the species&#8217; global trajectory. Preserving natural habitats, the study suggests, is not merely about saving scenic landscapes; it is about safeguarding the genetic library that this cryptic frog, and countless species like it, will need to survive the coming decades of environmental change.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Genetic diversity patterns across habitats and morphotypes of the South Asian frog Sphaerotheca maskeyi</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Genetic diversity patterns across habitats and forms of a morphologically cryptic South Asian frog (Sphaerotheca maskeyi)</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ahmed, W., Amin, H., Rais, M., &amp; DeWoody, J. A. (2026). Genetic diversity patterns across habitats and forms of a morphologically cryptic South Asian frog (Sphaerotheca maskeyi). <em>Molecular Biology Reports, 53</em>(1), Article 1568. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-026-12696-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-026-12696-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-026-12696-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11033-026-12696-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Sphaerotheca maskeyi, genetic diversity, cryptic species, 16S rRNA, RAG-1, phylogenetics, habitat degradation, color polymorphism, AMOVA, amphibian conservation, South Asia, molecular ecology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">196135</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
