<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MOF-303 &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/mof-303/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 09:35:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Battery Waste Heat Powers Water From Air in Symbiotic New System</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/battery-waste-heat-powers-water-from-air-in-symbiotic-new-system/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Faith Mcneil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 09:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air-derived clean drinking water]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atmospheric water harvesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[atmospheric water harvesting technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[battery thermal management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battery waste heat recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Closed-loop thermal management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[finite element simulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heat recycling in battery systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Innovative thermal energy architectures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lithium-ion battery heat dissipation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-grade heat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Low-grade heat utilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal-organic frameworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOF-303]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Communications.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote water supply solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sorbent regeneration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable energy and water solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Symbiotic thermal energy systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal symbiosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waste heat recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water-harvesting materials for cooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water–energy nexus]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=253025</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have coupled a MOF-303 atmospheric water harvester to a discharging battery so that waste heat regenerates the sorbent while adsorption cools the cell, boosting water production by 117 percent over solar-driven systems.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time a lithium-ion battery delivers current, a portion of its energy never reaches the device it powers. Instead, it leaks away as low-grade heat, warming the cell and, in large packs, posing a genuine engineering problem. Cooling systems are usually treated as a necessary cost: fans, heat sinks, and liquid loops that spend energy to move unwanted heat out of the system. A team of researchers from City University of Hong Kong, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, South China University of Technology, and their collaborators has now flipped that logic on its head. In a study published in Nature Communications, they demonstrate an architecture in which the heat a battery discards during discharge becomes the very energy source that drives the production of clean drinking water from air, while the water-harvesting material in turn keeps the battery cool. The result is a closed thermal loop in which two previously separate problems cancel each other out.</p>
<p>The water-harvesting side of the pairing relies on atmospheric water harvesting, or AWH, a technology that has attracted intense interest as a route to drinking water in arid regions without access to rivers, lakes, or desalination plants. Most AWH devices use porous sorbents that grab water vapor from ambient air overnight and then release it when heated, so the vapor can be condensed and collected. The bottleneck is regeneration: desorbing water from the sorbent requires a substantial input of heat, and nearly all practical designs have leaned on sunlight to supply it. That dependence ties water output to weather, daylight hours, and the intensity of solar irradiation, and it means the sorbent sits idle or underperforming whenever the sun is weak or absent. The new work asks a different question: if heat is needed anyway, why not borrow it from a source that is already producing it as a waste product?</p>
<p>The answer the researchers settled on is a metal-organic framework, a class of crystalline materials built from metal nodes connected by organic linkers into an extremely porous lattice. The specific sorbent chosen, MOF-303, is well known in the AWH literature for its strong affinity for water and its ability to uptake and release vapor in cycles. Crucially, the enthalpy of regeneration for this material, the amount of heat needed to drive water out of its pores, sits in a range that aligns closely with the thermal output of a battery under heavy discharge. That alignment is the heart of the symbiosis. When the battery discharges at currents between 12 and 20 amperes in the negative direction, the waste heat it generates is sufficient to push the MOF layer past its desorption threshold, triggering the release of captured water without any external heater or solar concentrator.</p>
<p>The experimental demonstration is striking in its specifics. Within 46 minutes of operation, the MOF sorbent layer exceeded 50 degrees Celsius, hot enough to liberate water vapor, which was then condensed and collected in a sealed setup. The released vapor represents water that was previously adsorbed from ambient air, meaning the device completes a full harvesting cycle powered entirely by energy that would otherwise have been thrown away. At the same time, the adsorption process on the sorbent acts as a heat sink for the battery: as water molecules bind within the MOF pores, they draw thermal energy out of the adjacent cell, passively stabilizing its temperature. The researchers measured a reduction in peak battery temperature of roughly 10 degrees Celsius, a meaningful margin in a field where every degree of overheating accelerates degradation and raises safety concerns.</p>
<p>The headline performance figure is a water production rate of 1.39 grams of water per gram of sorbent per day. To put that in context, the team reports that this represents a 117 percent increase over comparable solar-driven AWH systems. The improvement does not come from a better sorbent or a cleverer condenser; it comes from the fact that the heat supply is continuous and decoupled from the weather. A solar-driven harvester only regenerates while the sun is up and strong, whereas a battery-coupled harvester regenerates whenever the battery works, which in most applications is exactly when cooling is needed most. The thermal demands of the two systems are not merely compatible but complementary, each peaking precisely when the other can absorb it.</p>
<p>Behind the experiments sits a substantial computational effort. The team used finite-element simulations to model the heat transfer dynamics of the coupled system, validating the measured temperature profiles and water release behavior against the numerical predictions. These simulations also served a diagnostic purpose, allowing the researchers to identify the parameters that govern thermal efficiency in the integrated design: the thermal conductivity of the interface between cell and sorbent, the heat capacity of the assembly, and the kinetics of adsorption and desorption all emerge as levers that determine how much of the battery&#8217;s waste heat is actually captured and put to work. That kind of parametric map matters for anyone hoping to scale the concept beyond a laboratory prototype, because it indicates where engineering effort will pay off most.</p>
<p>The implications extend well beyond the specific pairing of MOF-303 and a lithium-ion cell. The authors frame the work as establishing a general closed-loop thermal cycle that repurposes energy-storage waste heat to power atmospheric water harvesting, and they suggest the strategy could enhance thermal efficiency across a variety of energy and environmental systems through internal heat recovery. Data centers, electric vehicle packs, grid-scale storage installations, and industrial electronics all generate large quantities of low-grade heat that is currently vented to the environment. Any of these could, in principle, host a sorbent layer that converts that heat into a useful output, whether water or something else, while simultaneously easing the cooling burden. The concept of symbiotic heat sharing turns what engineers call waste heat recovery from an add-on into a design principle.</p>
<p>There are also practical attractions for deployment in off-grid and resource-constrained settings. A device that produces water as a byproduct of energy storage requires no solar panel, no fuel, and no separate power supply for regeneration, which simplifies the system and reduces cost. In remote telecommunications towers, disaster relief camps, or military outposts where batteries are charged and discharged daily and drinking water is scarce, the same hardware could serve double duty. The passive nature of the cooling is equally significant: because the sorbent draws heat away through the adsorption process itself, there is no pump, fan, or compressor to fail, and the thermal management works even during power interruptions. The 10-degree reduction in peak temperature would translate directly into longer cycle life and improved safety margins for the cells.</p>
<p>Challenges remain before such systems reach commercial maturity. The study was conducted on laboratory-scale hardware, and scaling the thermal coupling from a single cell to a large battery pack, where heat distribution is far less uniform, will require careful engineering. The long-term stability of the MOF under repeated thermal cycling, its behavior in dusty or humid field environments, and the logistics of condensing and storing the harvested water all need attention. The published version of the paper is also an early-release, peer-reviewed accepted manuscript subject to further edits, so some quantitative details may be refined in the final record. Nevertheless, the core demonstration stands: the regeneration enthalpy of a well-chosen sorbent can be matched to the thermal output of a working battery, and the two systems can be made to serve each other. In a decade preoccupied with both energy efficiency and water scarcity, a technology that turns one problem into the solution for the other is exactly the kind of cross-disciplinary thinking the field has been waiting for.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Thermally coupled MOF-based atmospheric water harvesting and battery thermal management</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Symbiotic heat sharing in MOF-based atmospheric water generators for battery thermal management and sorbent regeneration</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Chen, W., Luo, M., Tan, Y., Yan, L., Liao, T., Liu, W., Liu, F., Chen, Z., Yao, J., Liang, X., Fang, Y., Wang, S., Ke, Y., Suwardi, A., Yuen, A. C. Y., Tan, S. C., &amp; Ravi, S. K. (2026). Symbiotic heat sharing in MOF-based atmospheric water generators for battery thermal management and sorbent regeneration. <em>Nature Communications</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-76774-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-76774-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-76774-z" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41467-026-76774-z</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> atmospheric water harvesting, MOF-303, metal-organic frameworks, battery thermal management, waste heat recovery, sorbent regeneration, thermal symbiosis, energy efficiency, water-energy nexus, finite-element simulation, low-grade heat, Nature Communications</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">253025</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Graphene-Boosted MOF Coatings Turn Sunlight Into Drinking Water From Desert Air</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/graphene-boosted-mof-coatings-turn-sunlight-into-drinking-water-from-desert-air/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Sanderson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 16:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adsorbent bed design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adsorption kinetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advanced coatings for water vapor adsorption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atmospheric water harvesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change and water scarcity solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copper foam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[desert air water extraction technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[few-layer graphene]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fog and dew collection alternatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graphene-enhanced metal-organic framework coatings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative materials for atmospheric water harvesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low-humidity water collection methods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metal-organic frameworks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOF-303]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[moisture absorption in arid environments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photothermal materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porous materials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porous materials for water vapor capture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar-driven desorption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar-powered atmospheric water harvesting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sunlight-driven water harvesting devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable desalination and water purification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thermal conductivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[water scarcity]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=241966</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Researchers have combined few-layer graphene with the metal-organic framework MOF-303 and copper foam substrates to create solar-driven adsorbent beds that harvest water from dry air faster and more efficiently than previous designs.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Water scarcity is one of the defining challenges of the twenty-first century, driven by population growth, climate change, pollution and the over-extraction of groundwater. Yet one vast reservoir remains largely untapped: the atmosphere, which is estimated to hold around 12,900 cubic kilometres of water in the form of vapour and droplets. Unlike rivers or aquifers, this resource is available to nearly everyone on the planet, even in the driest regions. A new study published in Results in Chemistry describes a carefully engineered material and device architecture designed to pull that water out of the air using nothing more than sunlight, and its findings could reshape how solar-driven water harvesters are built.</p>
<p>The research focuses on sorption-based atmospheric water harvesting, a technology that uses porous materials to capture water vapour even when the relative humidity is low, at or below 40 percent. Traditional approaches struggle in such conditions. Fog capture requires near-saturated misty air, while dew collection demands energy-intensive cooling of dry air to the dew point. Sorption-based systems, by contrast, can operate across a wide range of humidities and can release the captured water using low-grade heat such as sunlight or waste heat. The catch has been the adsorbent itself: conventional materials like zeolites and silica gel need desorption temperatures of roughly 75 to 200 degrees Celsius, which makes them inefficient when the heat source is a modest sun.</p>
<p>Metal-organic frameworks, or MOFs, have emerged as a promising alternative. These crystalline materials, built from metal nodes connected by organic linkers, can be tuned to adsorb large quantities of water and regenerate at temperatures of only about 40 to 80 degrees Celsius. Materials such as MOF-801, MOF-303 and UiO-66 combine high hydrothermal stability, large uptake capacities of up to 0.56 grams of water per gram of adsorbent, fast kinetics and favourable Type IV or V isotherm shapes. But MOFs carry their own weaknesses: thermal conductivities of just 0.1 to 0.4 watts per metre-kelvin, poor absorption of sunlight, and bed designs that throttle the movement of vapour in and out of the crystals.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Zhiyin Duan and Yu Cheng, tackled these limitations with a two-pronged strategy: modifying the material&#8217;s composition and optimising the structure of the adsorbent bed. First, they grew MOF-303 in the presence of few-layer graphene, a highly ordered two-dimensional form of carbon whose thermal conductivity can reach 2000 watts per metre-kelvin. Rather than mixing the components after synthesis, which can damage the MOF&#8217;s delicate pore structure, they used an in-situ solvothermal method, adding 4, 7, 10 or 15 weight percent of graphene directly into the reaction solution containing aluminium chloride, pyrazoledicarboxylic acid and sodium hydroxide.</p>
<p>The amount of graphene proved critical. At 15 weight percent loading, the composite lost 26.4 percent of its equilibrium water uptake compared with pure MOF-303, because excessive carbon crowds out pore volume and disrupts crystallinity. The sweet spot was 4 weight percent, designated MOF-303-FLG4. This composite preserved nearly all of the original adsorption capacity while boosting the intracrystalline diffusion coefficient of water vapour by 48 to 74 percent across relative humidities from 10 to 30 percent. Microscopy showed the elliptical MOF crystals resting on and between translucent graphene sheets, and nitrogen sorption measurements revealed that the average pore diameter had grown by 90 percent and total pore volume by 21.7 percent, even though the BET surface area dipped only slightly, from 931.87 to 909.84 square metres per gram.</p>
<p>Structural and chemical analyses confirmed the composite&#8217;s integrity. Powder X-ray diffraction retained every characteristic peak of MOF-303, with a new reflection at 26.48 degrees confirming the graphene&#8217;s presence. Infrared spectroscopy showed that the aluminium hydroxide bridges and carboxylate bands of the framework were unchanged, indicating that the graphene is held by physical interactions rather than chemical bonding. Raman spectra displayed the telltale D, G and 2D bands of layered graphitic carbon. Under simulated sunlight at an intensity of 1000 watts per square metre, delivered by a halogen lamp, the composite&#8217;s top surface warmed about 13.5 degrees Celsius more than pristine MOF-303, while its bottom surface ran 7.4 percent hotter, evidence that heat was penetrating deeper into the adsorbent layer.</p>
<p>Durability matters as much as performance, and here the composite also impressed. Over 20 consecutive adsorption-desorption cycles, with adsorption at 30 degrees Celsius and 40 percent relative humidity and desorption at 90 degrees Celsius, the water uptake of MOF-303-FLG4 fell by only 1.7 percent. X-ray diffraction patterns taken after cycling showed no peak shifts, disappearances or new phases, and the graphene reflection survived intact. The surface area declined by about 10.6 percent and total pore volume dropped to 0.458 cubic centimetres per gram, mainly through losses in mesopores and macropores, but substantial accessible porosity remained. Thermogravimetric analysis confirmed that framework decomposition still begins above 400 degrees Celsius, well beyond any operating temperature.</p>
<p>The second half of the study addressed a question often overlooked: how the physical arrangement of the adsorbent shapes performance. The team built packed beds of MOF-303-FLG4 powder with porosities of 0.65, 0.70 and 0.75 and thicknesses from 1 to 4 millimetres, held in containers of PTFE membrane and aluminium frames. Raising the porosity from 0.65 to 0.75 increased adsorption kinetics per unit mass by about 21 percent and desorption kinetics by 5 percent, but porosity 0.70 offered the best balance of capacity and speed. Thickness mattered even more dramatically: cutting the bed from 4 to 1 millimetre accelerated adsorption kinetics by 246 percent and desorption by 179 percent, because thinner layers shorten the diffusion paths that vapour must traverse.</p>
<p>The most striking results came from coated beds, in which the same mass of MOF-303-FLG4 powder was deposited onto copper foam substrates of varying pore density, using silica sol as an inorganic binder and no surfactants or adhesives. Scanning electron microscopy showed the coating following the three-dimensional copper skeleton deep into its pore network, held by mechanical interlocking, and a water droplet vanished from the surface within 253 milliseconds, confirming strong hydrophilicity. Substrates with a pore density of at least 60 pores per inch anchored the powder far more uniformly than the coarser 30 PPI foam, improving heat delivery during desorption. The coated bed reached a thermal conductivity of 0.793 watts per metre-kelvin, more than double the 0.306 of the loose powder, and its bottom-surface temperature under sunlight exceeded that of packed beds by up to 21.28 percent relative to pristine MOF-303.</p>
<p>The payoff is measurable in water. Under adsorption at 25 degrees Celsius and 30 percent relative humidity, the coated copper-foam bed captured 0.254 grams of water per gram of adsorbent within 30 minutes, outperforming reported configurations including MOF-derived nanoporous carbon, a MIL-101/salt monolith embedded in nickel foam, and a packed layer of pure MOF-303, which managed roughly 0.160 to 0.175 grams under comparable conditions. The coated bed&#8217;s diffusion coefficient of 1.82 times ten to the minus eighteenth square metres per second nearly doubled that of the packed bed, and its adsorption kinetics improved by 86 percent. The authors propose that graphene sheets act as conductive bridges between MOF crystals and the copper skeleton, dissipating the heat of adsorption during uptake and speeding solar heating during release. Their design recipe, 4 percent graphene, beds 2 to 3 millimetres thick, porosity near 0.7 and copper foam above 60 PPI, offers a practical blueprint for harvesters that could one day turn desert sunlight and thin desert air into a reliable supply of drinking water.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Solar-driven atmospheric water harvesting using graphene-enhanced MOF-303 adsorbent beds</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> MOF/few layer graphene coated copper foams and packed adsorbent beds for solar-driven atmospheric water harvesting applications</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Duan, Z., Cheng, Y., Huang, K., Kang, J., Fan, W., &amp; Zhao, X. (2026). MOF/few layer graphene coated copper foams and packed adsorbent beds for solar-driven atmospheric water harvesting applications. <em>Results in Chemistry, 31</em>, Article 103934. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2026.103934" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2026.103934</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rechem.2026.103934" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1016/j.rechem.2026.103934</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> atmospheric water harvesting, metal-organic frameworks, MOF-303, few-layer graphene, copper foam, solar-driven desorption, adsorption kinetics, thermal conductivity, porous materials, water scarcity, adsorbent bed design, photothermal materials</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">241966</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
