<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mitochondrial carrier proteins &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/mitochondrial-carrier-proteins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 12:48:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Human TOM and TIM22 complexes join forces to import mitochondrial carriers</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/human-tom-and-tim22-complexes-join-forces-to-import-mitochondrial-carriers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 17:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular energy metabolism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cellular energy metabolism and mitochondria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cryo-electron microscopy of mitochondrial complexes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eukaryotic mitochondrial protein trafficking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human mitochondrial protein import]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human mitochondrial protein import mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human mitochondrial translocases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial biogenesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial biogenesis and dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial carrier assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial carrier import mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial carrier insertion process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial carrier protein assembly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial carrier protein import]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial carrier proteins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial carrier translocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial double-membrane translocases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial function and dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial import machinery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial import machinery in humans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial intermembrane space protein transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial membrane protein import]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial membrane protein import pathways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial membrane protein transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial membrane translocation mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial protein import mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial protein import structure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial translocases in protein import]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular cooperation in mitochondria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular cooperation in mitochondrial function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular resolution of mitochondrial import pathways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[protein translocases in mitochondria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TIM22 complex mitochondrial insertion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOM and TIM22 complexes cooperation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOM complex mitochondrial translocation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TOM-TIM22 supercomplex]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/human-tom-and-tim22-complexes-join-forces-to-import-mitochondrial-carriers/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[For the first time, scientists have captured the human machinery that imports metabolite carriers into mitochondria in the act of transferring cargo from the outer membrane to the inner one. A team led by Long]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the first time, scientists have captured the human machinery that imports metabolite carriers into mitochondria in the act of transferring cargo from the outer membrane to the inner one. A team led by Long Li at Peking University reports in Nature Structural &amp; Molecular Biology that the TOM and TIM22 translocases, long thought to hand carrier proteins across the mitochondrial intermembrane space as independent machines, instead assemble into a single TOM–TIM22 supercomplex that couples translocation across both membranes in one continuous operation. The findings, published on 23 July 2026, are based on cryo-electron microscopy structures and biochemical mapping experiments that trace the substrate pathway at molecular resolution.</p>
<p>Mitochondria are double-membraned organelles that descended from free-living bacteria and still retain their own small genome, yet the overwhelming majority of the roughly thousand different proteins they need to function are encoded in the nucleus and synthesized on cytosolic ribosomes. Getting those proteins across two membranes, each with a distinct lipid composition and protein complement, is one of the defining logistical problems of eukaryotic cell biology. Mitochondria have solved it with a set of dedicated translocases, each specialized for a particular class of cargo, and the accuracy of the system matters enormously: mistargeted or unimported proteins can aggregate, clog membranes, or fail to deliver the metabolite transport that tissues such as heart, brain, and muscle depend on.</p>
<p>Among the most critical cargoes are the metabolite carriers of the SLC25 family, the largest solute transporter family in humans, which shuttle ADP and ATP, phosphate, fatty acids, and other essential metabolites across the otherwise impermeable inner membrane. Without these carriers, the organelle cannot exchange the chemical energy currency it produces with the rest of the cell, and cellular respiration grinds to a halt. These carriers are synthesized without cleavable presequences; instead, their six hydrophobic transmembrane segments must traverse the outer membrane through the TOM complex, cross the aqueous intermembrane space with the help of small Tim chaperones, and insert into the inner membrane through the TIM22 complex. In budding yeast, decades of work suggested that TOM and TIM22 act as separate stations along this pathway, connected only transiently by soluble Tim9–Tim10 chaperone complexes that ferry hydrophobic transmembrane segments through the space between the membranes. Yeast genetics and biochemistry had established the individual components of this route in considerable detail, which made the human system a natural point of comparison — and, as it turns out, a source of surprises.</p>
<p>The new study shows that human mitochondria operate differently. By expressing carrier substrates engineered for stable engagement of the import machinery, the researchers found that human TOM and TIM22 form a stable supercomplex detectable by blue native PAGE and pulldown assays from HEK293 cells. The supercomplex could be assembled in vitro using carrier substrates loaded onto Tim9–Tim10 chaperones, and its formation depended on the presence of an engaged substrate rather than occurring spontaneously in its absence, indicating that the carrier itself nucleates the junction between the two translocases. That substrate-dependence is functionally meaningful: it suggests the cell does not maintain a wasteful permanent bridge between membranes, but instead builds one on demand, precisely when a hydrophobic cargo molecule needs protection.</p>
<p>To visualize the transfer process, the team used cryo-electron microscopy on purified supercomplexes. They obtained maps of the substrate-engaged TOM complex and of the full TOM–TIM22 assembly, with structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank under accession codes 9WV1, 9WV2 and 9WV3 and maps in the EM Data Bank under EMD-66278 through EMD-66281. Cryo-EM has become the method of choice for interrogating membrane-embedded molecular machines of this size and fragility, because it images individual particles frozen in vitreous ice rather than requiring crystallization, and it has repeatedly revealed transient assemblies — like this one — that would never survive the rigors of crystallography. The structures reveal the carrier substrate threaded through the Tom40 channel with its transmembrane segments unpaired — unfolded and stretched out in single-helix form rather than packed as they are in the folded carrier — following a hydrophobic path along the inside of the channel wall. Notably, the substrate does not exit the bottom of the Tom40 pore as might have been expected. Instead, the transmembrane segments leave through an unexpected lateral groove on the side of the channel, emerging directly into the intermembrane space outside the main channel axis.</p>
<p>The researchers used photocrosslinking to map precisely where the substrate sits along its journey. By placing photoreactive probes at defined positions in the carrier transmembrane segments and the surrounding machinery, they showed that the carrier helices contact conserved hydrophobic residues lining the Tom40 channel, then transfer to the membrane-bound small Tim subunits, which in the human system include components that remain tethered to the inner membrane. These membrane-anchored small Tim proteins provide the entry site for the TIM22 complex, positioning the incoming hydrophobic segments for insertion. On the inner membrane side, a groove exposed on the membrane surface of TIM22 serves as the exit route through which carrier transmembrane segments leave the translocase and partition into the lipid bilayer. Together, the pathway forms a continuous, shielded route that keeps the aggregation-prone hydrophobic segments in a proteinaceous environment from the moment they leave the cytosol until they are embedded in the inner membrane.</p>
<p>That shielding principle is worth emphasizing, because it recurs throughout mitochondrial biogenesis. Hydrophobic transmembrane helices exposed to the aqueous intermembrane space would be prone to aggregation and misfolding, and the cell deploys chaperones at every vulnerable juncture — cytosolic factors on the way to the organelle, small Tim complexes in the space between membranes, and the translocase channels themselves as conduits. The supercomplex architecture takes this logic to its conclusion by eliminating any interval in which the cargo is not held by some component of the import machinery.</p>
<p>A central question was how the two membrane-embedded translocases physically connect across the intermembrane space. The structures show that Tim29, a subunit of the human TIM22 complex known to be required for carrier transport, participates in mediating supercomplex formation, along with Tim10b and the AGK subunit — the acylglycerol kinase that is mutated in Sengers syndrome and was previously identified as a TIM22 component. The authors tested the functional relevance of these connections by generating knockout and complemented cell lines; disruption of the relevant regions in AGK impaired carrier import, while the presequence-dependent import pathway, tested with the matrix protein SOD2, was unaffected, indicating that the TOM–TIM22 coupling is specific to the carrier route rather than a general collapse of mitochondrial import. This kind of pathway specificity is a hallmark of well-regulated cellular infrastructure: one branch of the import system can be compromised while parallel routes continue to operate, at least initially, a feature that helps explain the tissue-specific patterns of disease seen when individual components are lost.</p>
<p>To trap the supercomplex in a state suitable for imaging, the team also designed a fusion substrate in which Tim22 itself was linked to transmembrane helices 5 and 6 of the carrier GGC1 and a superfolder GFP tag, allowing the assembled complex to be purified through tandem affinity tags and examined by single-particle cryo-EM. This design let the researchers model how the carrier segments occupy the TOM channel while the receiving TIM22 complex stands ready at the inner membrane, and the two sfGFP densities at the TOM entrance provided a consistent handle for alignment during data processing. The strategy reflects a common and often decisive tactic in modern structural biology: when a transient assembly is too short-lived to purify intact, investigators engineer a tether that locks the interaction long enough to image it, then interpret the captured state in light of independent biochemical evidence.</p>
<p>The comparison with yeast is striking. In yeast Tom40, the equivalent exit path is blocked, and the extended C-terminal segment of the yeast channel forces substrates to follow a different route, consistent with the notion that in yeast the two complexes function separately. The human structures therefore suggest convergent but distinct solutions to the same problem: keeping hydrophobic carrier segments soluble as they cross the intermembrane space. The authors propose a sequential insertion model in which carrier transmembrane segments move one at a time from the TOM lateral groove onto the small Tim chaperones and then into the TIM22 exit groove, in a handoff that is tightly coordinated because the two translocases are held in a fixed spatial relationship within the supercomplex. A sequential handoff of this kind also provides a built-in quality-control opportunity: a segment that fails to transfer cleanly can be recognized and the process halted before a partially inserted, potentially harmful carrier accumulates in the inner membrane.</p>
<p>The work also intersects with recent findings on other cargo. A related study reported that the kinase PINK1, central to Parkin-mediated mitophagy and Parkinson&#039;s disease biology, is imported through human TOM complexes organized in arrays with the channel VDAC. The new carrier-pathway structures show a distinct substrate conformation and a distinct exit route compared with the PINK1-engaged TOM complex, underscoring that a single outer-membrane channel can accommodate multiple translocation modes with different substrate paths through the same pore. Taken together, these results suggest that Tom40 should be viewed not as a uniform pore but as a versatile platform whose behavior depends on the client it engages and the partner complexes it recruits.</p>
<p>The study has limitations inherent to its approach. The structures were obtained with engineered substrates and, in some cases, fusion proteins designed to stabilize the assembly, so the conformations captured may not represent every transient state that occurs during import in living mitochondria. The supercomplex was detected and enriched in the presence of substrate overexpression or crosslinking reagents such as glutaraldehyde, leaving open how dynamic the TOM–TIM22 association is under native conditions and what fraction of the cellular translocase population participates in supercomplexes at any given time. The resolution of the maps varies locally, and the unstructured or mobile regions of the substrate could not be fully modeled, which the authors acknowledge by marking unmodeled densities in their analyses. These caveats are typical of snapshot structural biology, and resolving them will likely require complementary approaches such as live-cell imaging of tagged import components, quantitative measurements of supercomplex abundance in unmanipulated mitochondria, and trapping of intermediate states along the handoff pathway.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the implications are broad. Mutations in carrier import machinery components, including AGK, are linked to severe human mitochondrial diseases, and defects in SLC25 carrier biogenesis compromise energy metabolism in every tissue. Sengers syndrome, for example, combines congenital cataracts, skeletal myopathy, and cardiomyopathy, a pattern consistent with the energy-intensive tissues most dependent on carrier-mediated metabolite exchange.</p>
<div class="scienmag-article-metadata"><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Biology</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Human TOM and TIM22 complexes join forces to import mitochondrial carriers</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Liu, X., Cai, H., Wang, H., Zhou, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, S., Zhu, J., &amp; Li, L. (2026). Direct coupling of human TOM and TIM22 complexes drives mitochondrial carrier import. <em>Nature Structural &amp; Molecular Biology, 33</em>(8), 1224-1235. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-026-01849-w" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-026-01849-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-026-01849-w" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41594-026-01849-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> cellular energy metabolism, human mitochondrial protein import mechanisms, mitochondrial biogenesis, mitochondrial carrier assembly, mitochondrial carrier protein import, mitochondrial function and dynamics, mitochondrial import machinery, mitochondrial membrane protein import, molecular cooperation in mitochondria, protein translocases in mitochondria, TIM22 complex mitochondrial insertion, TOM complex mitochondrial translocation</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">185617</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SLC25A10 Drives Cisplatin Resistance by Blocking Ferroptosis</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/slc25a10-drives-cisplatin-resistance-by-blocking-ferroptosis/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nathaniel Bowman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2025 16:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer biology advancements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chemotherapy resistance strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cisplatin resistance in cervical cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ferroptosis mechanism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iron-dependent cell death]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lipid peroxidation in cancer therapy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitochondrial carrier proteins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[molecular pathways in chemotherapy resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overcoming drug resistance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulated cell death in cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SLC25A10]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[therapeutic vulnerabilities in oncology]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/slc25a10-drives-cisplatin-resistance-by-blocking-ferroptosis/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In a groundbreaking study that could reshape therapeutic strategies for cervical cancer, researchers have unveiled a novel mechanism underlying chemotherapy resistance. The study, published in Cell Death Discovery, elucidates the role of the mitochondrial carrier protein SLC25A10 in promoting cisplatin resistance by suppressing ferroptosis, a form of regulated cell death. This discovery not only deepens [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a groundbreaking study that could reshape therapeutic strategies for cervical cancer, researchers have unveiled a novel mechanism underlying chemotherapy resistance. The study, published in <em>Cell Death Discovery</em>, elucidates the role of the mitochondrial carrier protein SLC25A10 in promoting cisplatin resistance by suppressing ferroptosis, a form of regulated cell death. This discovery not only deepens our understanding of cancer biology but also opens promising avenues for overcoming drug resistance in cervical cancer patients.</p>
<p>Cisplatin remains one of the frontline chemotherapeutic agents against various malignancies, including cervical cancer. Despite its efficacy, resistance to cisplatin poses a formidable challenge, often leading to treatment failure and poor clinical outcomes. The molecular pathways contributing to this resistance are complex and multifaceted, invoking diverse survival mechanisms within cancer cells. The recent investigation sheds light on how SLC25A10 mediates these responses through interaction with ferroptotic pathways.</p>
<p>Ferroptosis, an iron-dependent process characterized by the accumulation of lethal lipid peroxides, acts as a natural barrier against tumor progression and a targetable vulnerability in cancer therapy. Unlike apoptosis or necrosis, ferroptosis operates through distinct metabolic and oxidative stress axes, thereby representing a critical mechanism by which cancer cells may succumb when subjected to therapeutic interventions. The study highlights the inhibitory effect of SLC25A10 on ferroptosis, thereby facilitating cellular survival in the cytotoxic milieu induced by cisplatin.</p>
<p>Delving into the molecular intricacies, the researchers identified that SLC25A10 functions as a mitochondrial dicarboxylate carrier, orchestrating redox homeostasis within the organelle. By regulating the transport of metabolites crucial for maintaining glutathione levels—the primary intracellular antioxidant—SLC25A10 exerts control over the oxidative stress response. Consequently, the suppression of ferroptotic lipid peroxidation under the influence of SLC25A10 elevates cancer cell resilience against cisplatin-induced cytotoxicity.</p>
<p>The methodology employed was both rigorous and multi-dimensional, combining gene expression analyses, in vitro functional assays, and in vivo tumor models. Knockdown experiments targeting SLC25A10 potentiated ferroptosis markers while enhancing the cytotoxic efficacy of cisplatin. Conversely, overexpression of SLC25A10 curtailed lipid peroxidation and diminished ferroptotic cell death, thereby corroborating its functional role in drug resistance mechanisms.</p>
<p>Intriguingly, the metabolic profiling of cervical cancer cells revealed that SLC25A10 modulates cellular bioenergetics and redox status through its transport activity. This modulation preserves mitochondrial integrity and prevents excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation, which would otherwise trigger ferroptosis. The findings suggest that SLC25A10 acts as a safeguard against oxidative stress-induced demise, thereby underpinning a novel survival axis within cisplatin-resistant cervical cancer cells.</p>
<p>Beyond the intrinsic cellular mechanisms, the study touches upon the clinical implications of SLC25A10 expression levels. Analysis of patient-derived tumor samples demonstrated a positive correlation between elevated SLC25A10 expression and poor response to cisplatin-based therapies. This association positions SLC25A10 as a potential prognostic biomarker to stratify patients according to their predicted chemotherapeutic outcomes and tailor personalized treatment regimens.</p>
<p>Moreover, the therapeutic potential of targeting SLC25A10 was explored through pharmacological inhibition and gene silencing approaches. These interventions sensitized resistant cervical cancer cells to cisplatin, restoring ferroptosis susceptibility and enhancing tumor suppression in preclinical models. Such findings highlight the translational promise of combining ferroptosis-inducing agents with existing chemotherapy to overcome resistance barriers in clinical settings.</p>
<p>The study also contextualizes its findings within the broader landscape of cancer metabolism and cell death regulation. It emphasizes that metabolic rewiring, especially in mitochondrial functions, is integral to the adaptive responses of tumors facing chemotherapeutic stress. By pinpointing SLC25A10&#8217;s central role, the research enriches our comprehension of how organelle-specific metabolite transporters can influence cancer survival pathways.</p>
<p>In terms of future directions, the authors advocate for the development of selective SLC25A10 inhibitors to evaluate their efficacy and safety in clinical trials. Additionally, they propose investigating combinatorial regimens that synergize cisplatin with ferroptosis inducers to maximize antitumor efficacy. The research also calls for deeper exploration of SLC25A10’s role in other cancer types where cisplatin resistance remains a critical hurdle.</p>
<p>This study thus represents a paradigm shift in the quest to surmount chemotherapy resistance. It paves the way for a new class of therapeutic interventions that exploit the vulnerabilities within the ferroptosis regulatory network. By deciphering how mitochondrial metabolite transport modulates cell death pathways, the findings equip oncologists and researchers with novel targets to potentially improve outcomes for cervical cancer patients.</p>
<p>Notably, the elucidation of SLC25A10’s ferroptosis-inhibiting function also adds a layer of complexity to our understanding of mitochondrial dynamics in cancer. It challenges researchers to reexamine mitochondria not merely as powerhouses but as pivotal modulators of cell fate decisions under therapeutic pressures. This nuanced perspective could inspire innovative designs for mitochondria-targeted therapies beyond the context of cervical cancer.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the implications of this research transcend oncology, as ferroptosis has been implicated in various pathological states, including neurodegeneration and ischemic injury. Insights into SLC25A10’s function could thus have interdisciplinary relevance, catalyzing advancements across biomedical fields where oxidative stress and regulated cell death are critical.</p>
<p>In conclusion, the identification of SLC25A10 as a key regulator of cisplatin resistance through ferroptosis inhibition heralds a significant breakthrough in cancer biology. These findings underscore the importance of targeting mitochondrial metabolism and redox balance to overcome drug resistance and enhance therapeutic efficacy. As this research progresses from bench to bedside, it holds promise for transforming cervical cancer treatment paradigms and improving survival rates worldwide.</p>
<p>Subject of Research:<br />
Article Title:<br />
Article References:<br />
Ma, C., Lu, X., Ni, C. et al. SLC25A10 promotes cisplatin resistance by inhibiting ferroptosis in cervical cancer. <em>Cell Death Discov.</em> 11, 447 (2025). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-025-02712-5">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-025-02712-5</a><br />
Image Credits: AI Generated<br />
DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-025-02712-5">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41420-025-02712-5</a><br />
Keywords: cisplatin resistance, cervical cancer, SLC25A10, ferroptosis, mitochondrial metabolism, oxidative stress, chemotherapy resistance, lipid peroxidation, glutathione, reactive oxygen species, tumor survival, cell death regulation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">87172</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
