<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mineral resources &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/mineral-resources/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 03:52:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Media Registration Opens for GSA Connects 2026 Geoscience Meeting in Denver</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/media-registration-opens-for-gsa-connects-2026-geoscience-meeting-in-denver/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 03:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artemis II]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate and water debates in geosciences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continental drift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver geology and mining heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[early registration for science journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth in motion and continental drift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geological society annual meeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geological Society of America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geoscience conference media registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geoscience professional development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geoscience research coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[groundwater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSA Connects 2026]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GSA Connects 2026 Denver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovations in Earth exploration technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media registration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mineral resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planetary exploration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planetary exploration and mineral resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public engagement in geoscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riverscapes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riverscapes and environmental hazards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science communication]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=201300</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Geological Society of America has opened media registration for its GSA Connects 2026 annual meeting, running 11–14 October at the Colorado Convention Center in Denver.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thousands of geoscientists will gather in Denver this October for GSA Connects 2026, the Geological Society of America&#8217;s annual meeting, taking place 11–14 October 2026 at the Colorado Convention Center. The society has opened media registration for working journalists, freelance science writers, and public information officers who want to cover the new research, technical sessions, and professional conversations that will shape the field in the years ahead. Organizers say there is still time to secure credentials, and they are encouraging reporters to preregister before the deadline in early October.</p>
<p>The meeting arrives at a moment when the geosciences are increasingly central to public debates about climate, water, minerals, and planetary exploration. Denver offers an unusually fitting stage for those discussions. The city sits at the foot of the Colorado Rockies, a range that geologists still regard as one of the most puzzling mountain systems on Earth, and the region carries both a rich mining heritage and some of the nation&#8217;s most pressing water challenges. Meeting organizers have built the program around three interlocking themes: Celebrating a Century of Continental Drift: Understanding Earth in Motion; Riverscapes in Transition: Dynamics, Hazards, and Human Futures; and Innovations in Exploration from Deep Earth to Deep Space. According to GSA, these themes are three tines on the same fork, separate yet interrelated, working together toward a shared goal of understanding and appreciating the workings of Earth and other planets.</p>
<p>The continental drift theme marks a century since the scientific community began to accept that continents move, an idea that transformed geology from a static science into a dynamic one. Sessions under this theme will revisit how plate tectonics is understood today, including a Pardee Keynote Symposium titled Bottoms Up: Perspectives from &#8220;Bottom-up&#8221; and &#8220;Top-down&#8221; Approaches to Tectonic Reconstructions, which will examine competing methods for reconstructing ancient configurations of Earth&#8217;s surface. The riverscapes theme, meanwhile, addresses how rivers and their corridors are changing under the combined pressures of natural dynamics and human activity, a topic with direct implications for flood hazards, water supply, and ecosystem management.</p>
<p>The third theme extends the meeting&#8217;s reach beyond Earth itself. Innovations in Exploration from Deep Earth to Deep Space will highlight research that spans from the planet&#8217;s interior to other worlds, reflecting a growing overlap between terrestrial geology and planetary science. That connection will be on prominent display in the noontime lecture series. On Monday, 12 October, Kelsey Young will deliver a lecture titled Artemis II to the Moon and Back: The First Step in a New Era of Crewed Scientific Exploration, with a livestream available for remote audiences. The talk arrives as NASA&#8217;s Artemis program prepares to return astronauts to the Moon, a mission profile in which field geology expertise plays a central role.</p>
<p>The Pardee Keynote Symposia, among the most closely watched sessions at any GSA meeting, will cover an unusually broad sweep of contemporary issues this year. In addition to the tectonic reconstructions session, the lineup includes Geoheritage Values in a World of Resource Extraction; Mineral Resources and Society; and From Deep Earth to Digital Twins: Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Groundwater in Earth System Science. The latter session signals how machine learning and digital modeling are entering mainstream hydrogeology, offering new tools for predicting groundwater behavior in systems that are increasingly stressed by drought and demand. The mineral resources sessions arrive as governments and industries worldwide confront supply chains for critical minerals needed for batteries, electronics, and renewable energy infrastructure.</p>
<p>Several distinguished lectures round out the scientific program. GSA President Glenn Thackray will deliver the Presidential Address, The Many Paths of Geoscientists, at noon on Sunday, 11 October, followed by the society&#8217;s Awards Ceremony, both of which will be livestreamed. The Michael T. Halbouty Distinguished Lecture will be given by Dr. Paul Doss, whose talk is titled Geologists in the Critical Zone&#8230;in a Critical Time, a reference to the near-surface zone where rock, soil, water, air, and living organisms interact and where many of society&#8217;s environmental challenges play out. On Tuesday, 13 October, Marilyn Russell and Sabrina Kainz will present a noontime lecture titled Connecting People to Place: A Community Engagement Model for Advancing Geoheritage Stewardship, also with a livestream available.</p>
<p>Organizers have also prepared topical sessions aimed specifically at journalists and public information officers covering critical subjects, with curated resources on fire, climate change, volcanoes, and planetary geology, along with a complete list of technical sessions for those planning their coverage. The science communication offerings are particularly strong this year. On Sunday, 11 October at 5 p.m., a panel discussion titled From Research to Bookshelf: Bringing Science to the Public will be moderated by GeoGirl Rachel Phillips and will feature authors Amy Atwater of The Fossil Keeper&#8217;s Treasure, Paul Bierman of When the Ice Is Gone, David Montgomery of ReGen, and Rob Thomas of GSA&#8217;s Montana Rocks!, with a book signing to follow. On Monday, 12 October at 4 p.m., Bierman will host a screening of the Emmy Award–winning film The Memory of Darkness, Light, and Ice, based on his book When the Ice Is Gone, followed by a discussion and book signing.</p>
<p>Eligibility for media credentials is clearly defined. Working press includes journalists, photographers, videographers, bloggers, authors, and filmmakers representing bona fide news media organizations, who must present a press card, letter, or business card from their publication. Freelance science writers must show a current membership card from organizations such as NASW, ISWA, regional affiliates, CSWA, ACS, ABSW, or EUSJA, along with evidence of science reporting published in 2024, 2025, or 2026; the society notes that authorship on technical research does not qualify for press credentials. Public information officers from scientific societies, educational institutions, and government agencies are also eligible. All press registrations are issued at the discretion of the GSA Press Office and are non-transferable.</p>
<p>Working media receive complimentary registration, which permits access to technical sessions, the exhibit hall, and the on-site Media Resource Center, a pressroom reserved exclusively for working press to conduct interviews, write stories, and take a break between sessions, with coffee and snacks available and a welcome gift for pre-registered attendees. Media preregistration is encouraged before Friday, 2 October 2026, with onsite registration available afterward by contacting the GSA press office. Presenters who are also journalists must pay the standard meeting registration fee, and journalists and PIOs must pay for any additional events they wish to attend. Media representatives may book hotel rooms at their own expense within GSA hotel blocks. Reporters unable to attend in person can register to receive press releases, daily tip sheets, and livestream information for the noontime lectures, ensuring that the meeting&#8217;s science reaches audiences far beyond Denver.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Media registration for the Geological Society of America&#x27;s GSA Connects 2026 annual geoscience meeting in Denver</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Media Invitation: GSA Connects 2026 in Denver</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Media Invitation: GSA Connects 2026 in Denver. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1143248" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> GSA Connects 2026, Geological Society of America, geoscience, Denver, continental drift, riverscapes, planetary exploration, Artemis II, groundwater, mineral resources, science communication, media registration</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">201300</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mars May Hold Ore Deposits Rich Enough to Mine, Decades of Sample Data Suggest</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/mars-may-hold-ore-deposits-rich-enough-to-mine-decades-of-sample-data-suggest/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant Pearson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 02:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analysis of Martian ore grades]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Curiosity rover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extraterrestrial mineral deposits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gale crater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heavy mineral sands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[In-situ resource utilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-situ resource utilization on Mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jezero crater]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars geology and mineralogy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars mineral deposits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars resource exploration strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars rover mineral data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mars sample analysis for resource detection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martian meteorite composition studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martian meteorites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martian ore resource potential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mineral resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ni-Cu-PGE sulfides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ore deposits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perseverance rover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planetary mining on Mars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[porphyry copper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[space mining feasibility]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=201064</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new analysis of decades of meteorite and rover data finds that Mars likely hosts ore-grade deposits of copper, nickel, sulfur and other metals, with major implications for future human settlement.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more than half a century, plans for living off the land on Mars have revolved around a remarkably short shopping list: pull carbon dioxide from the thin atmosphere, dig up water ice or bake it out of hydrated minerals, and turn those feedstocks into oxygen, methane and hydrogen for breathing and for rocket propellant. A new comprehensive analysis argues that this volatile-centric view is far too narrow for the ambitions now taking shape, from commercial settlement concepts to long-duration crewed missions, and that the Red Planet&#8217;s non-volatile mineral resources deserve the same rigorous, sample-based scrutiny that water and atmosphere have received.</p>
<p>The study, published as the inaugural article in the journal Space and Planetary Resources, was conducted by Kevin M. Cannon of Ethos Space Corp. and the Colorado School of Mines. Drawing on decades of laboratory analyses of nearly 400 martian meteorites and on in-situ measurements from the Spirit, Opportunity, Curiosity, Perseverance and Zhurong rovers, Cannon compiled the highest reported concentrations of 83 naturally occurring elements on Mars and compared them with the grades of ore deposits mined on Earth. The work arrives, he argues, at an inflection point between what may be the last large robotic science missions to Mars and the first serious steps toward commercialization and human landings.</p>
<p>A central theme of the analysis is that past discussions of planetary resources have often stumbled into logical errors that the terrestrial mining industry abandoned long ago. The most common is the presence-versus-absence fallacy: asking whether an element exists on Mars at all, when modern mass spectrometers can detect parts per trillion in virtually any material. What matters, Cannon stresses, is concentration, or grade, in a specific raw material at a specific location, because the energy and cost of extraction rise exponentially as grade falls. A gold mining company does not care how much gold is in Earth&#8217;s crust; it cares about the grade of a particular deposit. Similarly, the speciation of an element into separable ore minerals, such as zircon or monazite, versus lattice-bound substitutions in silicates, can make the difference between a practical resource and an impractical one.</p>
<p>The comparison baseline matters too. Average crustal composition is the wrong yardstick; martian concentrations must be measured against actual terrestrial ore bodies, which are enriched many orders of magnitude above bulk crust. When that comparison is made, the results span more than five orders of magnitude, with a median ratio of 27, meaning terrestrial ores are on average 27 times richer than the best-known martian materials. Six elements, including oxygen, sulfur, germanium, rubidium, argon and xenon, match or exceed the concentrations of the materials they are extracted from on Earth. Volatile elements such as sulfur, chlorine and bromine sit close to terrestrial ore grades, consistent with Mars having accreted from more volatile-rich building blocks. By contrast, the light metals lithium, beryllium and boron, the platinum group elements, the light rare earths, and the nuclear fuels thorium and uranium are orders of magnitude depleted in known martian samples.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most striking conclusions concern specific deposit types that rovers may have already brushed against. In Gale crater, ChemCam on the Curiosity rover detected copper enrichments throughout the stratigraphy of Mount Sharp, with the highest values in the Kimberley Formation. Detailed analysis suggests the copper occurs both in detrital grains of the potassic sandstones and adsorbed on manganese oxide coatings, pointing toward a porphyry copper or impact-hydrothermal deposit somewhere in the sediment source region. That would be a remarkable finding, because earlier theoretical work had specifically predicted that porphyry copper deposits should not exist on Mars, a prediction made before the discovery of evolved, potassic igneous lithologies and the full extent of ancient water-rock interaction on the planet.</p>
<p>At Jezero crater, the Perseverance rover has found strongly correlated nickel and copper enrichments in highly altered, aluminum-rich float rocks, with ore-grade values that support the long-standing prediction of Ni-Cu-PGE sulfide deposits associated with ultramafic volcanism. The region&#8217;s extensive olivine-rich unit, mapped from orbit and confirmed on the ground by an olivine cumulate outcrop on the crater floor, fits the terrestrial analog of large igneous provinces where such sulfide ores segregate from lava flows. Perseverance&#8217;s PIXL instrument has also detected lamellar bands of zirconium, titanium, chromium and phosphorus-bearing dense grains in deltaic sediments, evidence for heavy mineral lag deposits of the kind mined on Earth for ilmenite and zircon. Cannon notes that in all three cases the enriched materials were transported by water away from their sources, leaving only shadows of the original ore bodies, much as the California gold rush began in creek beds before prospectors traced the gold back to hard rock.</p>
<p>The quantitative picture is sharpened by extrapolation from element-element correlations in the meteorite collection. A single SuperCam point at Jezero reporting up to 2000 parts per million copper, if taken at face value, would predict roughly 2.2 parts per million ruthenium based on the meteorite correlation, exceeding typical terrestrial platinum-group ore grades even though the value falls below rover detection limits. Similarly, a PIXL spot measuring 1.4 weight percent zirconium, attributed to zircon or baddeleyite, implies about 362 parts per million hafnium, slightly above terrestrial ore values. These calculations suggest that ore-quality enrichments may already have been encountered on rover traverses, hidden below the sensitivity of onboard instruments, and that only a tiny fraction of the martian surface has been examined at all.</p>
<p>Mapping the indicators globally reveals a crucial geographic pattern. Olivine detections, potassium- and thorium-rich alkali terrains, aluminum clay exposures and fan-shaped sedimentary landforms, the best orbital proxies for sulfide, porphyry-like, leached and placer deposits respectively, cluster largely in equatorial regions such as Nili Fossae, Mawrth Vallis and eastern Valles Marineris. The mid-latitudes, where shallow ground ice is abundant, show a notable absence of these indicators, partly because younger lava flows, plains deposits and ice-dust mantles bury the ancient Noachian units where ores are most likely. This creates a potential tradeoff for settlement planning: if water is mined from ground ice, prospecting for metals may be pushed to marginal zones, but if water comes from hydrated minerals or other equatorial sources, the richest known mineral provinces become accessible. Atmospheric carbon dioxide and iron, available everywhere from regolith and iron meteorites, impose no such constraint.</p>
<p>Volumetrics remain a major uncertainty. The hematite-bearing unit at Meridiani Planum covers some 150,000 square kilometers, though its thickness is poorly known, while a native sulfur deposit recently discovered by Curiosity in Gediz Vallis has an estimated volume of 28,000 to 50,000 cubic meters. For the copper and nickel-copper signals at Gale and Jezero, the source deposits, if intact, likely exceed the transported materials in which they were detected, but elements like copper and nickel cannot yet be mapped from orbit. Cannon also flags unexplored geologic settings as prime targets for human fieldwork: evolved dacite terrains in Syrtis Major and the Eridania basin, impact-induced and magma-ice hydrothermal systems, speculative ancient seafloor deposits, and deeply leached aluminum clay stratigraphies like those at Mawrth Vallis, where extreme alteration hinted at by Jezero&#8217;s float rocks may have concentrated additional elements.</p>
<p>The bottom line is a sober but encouraging assessment. Mars falls between the Moon and Earth in its ore grades, as expected for a planet with intermediate geologic activity and water-rock interaction. Basic structural and industrial metals, including iron, aluminum, manganese, chromium, copper, zinc and titanium, show promising enrichments detectable with current orbital and geomorphologic data and should be prioritized for an initial settlement, while elements like lead, uranium and antimony are so depleted that substitution or import will likely remain necessary. As robotic exploration winds down and human missions approach, the study argues that the periodic table, not just the water cycle, must become the framework for choosing where on Mars to go and what to build when we get there.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Assessment of non-volatile mineral and ore resources on Mars using meteorite and rover sample data</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Mineral resources of Mars based on decades of sample analysis</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Cannon, K. M. (2025). Mineral resources of Mars based on decades of sample analysis. <em>Space and Planetary Resources, 1</em>(1), Article 1. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44461-025-00001-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44461-025-00001-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44461-025-00001-8" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44461-025-00001-8</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Mars, mineral resources, ore deposits, in-situ resource utilization, martian meteorites, Gale crater, Jezero crater, porphyry copper, Ni-Cu-PGE sulfides, heavy mineral sands, Perseverance rover, Curiosity rover</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">201064</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
