<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Microplastic ingestion effects on marine crustaceans &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/microplastic-ingestion-effects-on-marine-crustaceans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:23:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.1</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Microplastics May Carry Toxic Diatom Chemicals That Harm Copepods</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/microplastics-may-carry-toxic-diatom-chemicals-that-harm-copepods/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sloane Callahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Climate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biofilm formation on plastic debris in oceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biofilms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological pump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chemical pathways of microplastic toxicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copepod reproduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copepods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Diatom bioactive chemical production on plastic surfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diatoms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental consequences of floating plastic debris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Impact of microplastics on copepods and marine food webs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Long-term ecological impacts of microplastic pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine chemical ecology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marine microbial communities on plastic surfaces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marine pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microplastic ingestion effects on marine crustaceans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microplastics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microplastics and marine pollutant transfer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxylipins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plastisphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Role of plastisphere in marine chemical pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Skeletonema marinoi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toxic chemicals associated with diatom colonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zooplankton]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=204564</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new review proposes that microplastics colonized by oxylipin-producing diatoms may deliver a hidden chemical stress to copepods on top of the physical harm plastic ingestion already causes.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microplastics have long been viewed as one of the most pervasive pollutants of the modern ocean, but a new review published in Discover Ecology suggests their danger may extend well beyond the physical damage plastic particles themselves can inflict. Vincenzo Donnarumma and Ennio Russo, in a mini-review that builds a conceptual framework from hundreds of studies, argue that floating plastic debris may act as a delivery vehicle for potent bioactive chemicals produced by the microscopic diatoms that colonize plastic surfaces. If confirmed, this hidden chemical pathway could magnify the harm that microplastics already impose on copepods, the tiny crustaceans that underpin marine food webs worldwide.</p>
<p>The story begins with the plastisphere, the term coined for the communities of bacteria, algae, fungi, and other microbes that rapidly form biofilms on plastic debris once it enters aquatic environments. Diatoms are consistently among the earliest and most successful colonizers of these artificial surfaces. Because plastics are buoyant, long-lived, and chemically inert compared with natural substrates, they offer diatoms a novel and stable ecological niche in the sunlit surface ocean. Field surveys from the Black Sea to intertidal habitats worldwide, along with laboratory mesocosm experiments, have repeatedly documented genera such as Chaetoceros, Thalassiosira, Skeletonema, Navicula, and Nitzschia dominating plastic-associated biofilms, sometimes outcompeting every other photosynthetic organism on the particle.</p>
<p>What makes this dominance ecologically significant is that many of these same diatom genera are well known as producers of oxylipins, a family of lipid-derived defensive chemicals. When diatom cells are damaged, for example when a copepod crunches them during feeding, enzymes called lipoxygenases are released and convert membrane fatty acids into a diverse array of oxylipins, including polyunsaturated aldehydes and linear oxygenated fatty acids. Decades of laboratory and field research have shown that these compounds are teratogenic to copepods: they reduce egg production, impair hatching success, and can kill nauplii outright, sometimes with devastating effects on entire cohorts. In extreme cases documented in the literature, diets rich in oxylipin-producing diatoms such as Skeletonema marinoi have led to one hundred percent naupliar mortality.</p>
<p>Copepods, meanwhile, occupy a pivotal position in ocean ecology. With roughly thirteen thousand described species, they can make up seventy to ninety percent of mesozooplankton abundance in many regions, forming the critical link between phytoplankton and commercially important fish, marine invertebrates, and even cetaceans. They also play a major role in the ocean carbon cycle, packing organic material into dense fecal pellets that sink rapidly and transporting carbon through their daily vertical migrations. Because copepods passively entrain particles of suitable size into their feeding currents, they readily ingest microplastics that overlap in dimensions with their natural prey such as diatoms, dinoflagellates, and ciliates.</p>
<p>The consequences of this ingestion are well documented. Laboratory studies have shown that exposure to microplastic concentrations as low as fifty particles per milliliter can alter copepod feeding behavior, prey selection, reproductive output, molting cycles, and lipid production. In the copepod Acartia tonsa, polystyrene beads administered during egg formation produced smaller eggs, reduced naupliar survival, and population models projecting a thirty-fold decline over twenty generations. Molecular analyses reveal that microplastic ingestion triggers oxidative stress pathways involving MAPK and Nrf2 signaling, drains cellular energy reserves, and compromises swimming performance. Fecal pellets produced by exposed copepods become smaller and sink more slowly, potentially weakening the biological pump that carries carbon to the deep ocean.</p>
<p>The striking observation at the heart of the new review is that these microplastic effects closely resemble those historically attributed to oxylipin-producing diatoms. Reduced egg viability, impaired hatching, naupliar mortality, and disrupted maternal investment appear in both bodies of literature. Donnarumma and Russo propose that the overlap may not be coincidental. When a copepod ingests a plastic particle densely colonized by diatoms, the mechanical crushing of those cells during digestion could liberate lipoxygenases that then react with polyunsaturated fatty acids from any of the other organisms in the gut, whether eukaryotic or prokaryotic, generating oxylipins on the spot. In effect, the plastic particle would function as a chemical weapon factory inside the grazer.</p>
<p>Biofouling makes this scenario more plausible rather than less. Experiments consistently show that copepods ingest aged, biofilm-coated microplastics more readily than pristine particles, apparently because microbial colonization makes the plastic smell and behave more like food. Biofilm-derived infochemicals can even act as foraging cues that attract grazers. Meanwhile, nutrient limitation, a condition that increases oxylipin production in diatoms, also drives diatoms to over-secrete adhesive extracellular polymeric substances, making their biofilms stickier and more robust on plastic surfaces. The result is a particle that is simultaneously more attractive to copepods and more chemically loaded with potential toxin producers.</p>
<p>The authors are careful to stress that no study has yet directly demonstrated oxylipin synthesis by epiplastic diatoms on plastic debris. Their framework remains a hypothesis, albeit one grounded in converging lines of indirect evidence. To test it, they propose a clear experimental roadmap: culture an oxylipin-producing species such as Skeletonema marinoi on plastic debris, extract and characterize the resulting metabolites using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry, and compare copepod responses to sterile versus diatom-colonized particles. Adult females would be exposed to four treatments, healthy diets, free-living diatoms, sterile microplastics, and colonized microplastics, with hatching success and gene expression serving as key endpoints. Field surveys using fine neuston nets, rather than the standard manta nets that miss the relevant size fractions, would then establish whether the mechanism operates in nature.</p>
<p>The stakes extend well beyond copepod physiology. If plastic-borne oxylipins compound the reproductive failures already observed in laboratory studies, population-level consequences could ripple upward through marine food webs, reducing prey availability for fish larvae and other consumers. Disruption of copepod-mediated carbon export could further alter the efficiency of the biological pump, with implications for climate-relevant biogeochemical cycles. The authors also highlight a glaring geographic bias in existing research toward the Northern Hemisphere, leaving the Southern Ocean and much of the tropics as data deserts in which the combined stress of microplastics and epiplastic chemistry remains entirely unquantified.</p>
<p>For now, the review reframes microplastic pollution as a dual threat: a physical and nutritional burden on grazers, and a potential vector for chemical stress generated by the living communities that plastics carry with them. Whether that second threat is real in the ocean will depend on the experimental and field campaigns the authors now call for, but the convergence of evidence they assemble makes the hypothesis one of the most intriguing new directions in marine chemical ecology.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Microplastics as potential vectors of diatom-derived oxylipins affecting copepod physiology and reproduction</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Microplastics as potential vectors of diatom oxylipins and possible effects on copepods</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Donnarumma, V., &amp; Russo, E. (2026). Microplastics as potential vectors of diatom oxylipins and possible effects on copepods. <em>Discover Ecology, 2</em>(1), Article 11. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44396-026-00029-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s44396-026-00029-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s44396-026-00029-w" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s44396-026-00029-w</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> microplastics, plastisphere, diatoms, oxylipins, copepods, marine chemical ecology, biofilms, copepod reproduction, biological pump, marine pollution, Skeletonema marinoi, zooplankton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">204564</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
