<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>methanotrophs &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/methanotrophs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 13:17:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Lab tests: microscale iron reduces rice arsenic but boosts methane</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/lab-tests-microscale-iron-reduces-rice-arsenic-but-boosts-methane/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 13:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic and methane dynamics in paddy fields]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic immobilization using iron minerals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic remediation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arsenic remediation in rice paddies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental effects of soil amendments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas emissions from rice cultivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas mitigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of iron amendments on methane emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iron minerals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanogenesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanotrophs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial communities in flooded soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microcosm and greenhouse rice experiments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microscale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microscale zero-valent iron for arsenic reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paddy soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reducing arsenic uptake in rice crops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice cultivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice soil arsenic contamination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil biogeochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade-offs in arsenic mitigation strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero-valent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zero-valent iron]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=329275</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A controlled microcosm and greenhouse rice study found that microscale zero-valent iron reduced arsenic in grain by 34% while increasing methane production through stronger methanogenesis.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microscale zero-valent iron sharply lowered arsenic mobility and accumulation in rice grown in contaminated paddy soil, but the amendment also increased methane emissions by changing the microbial communities that produce and consume the gas. Laboratory microcosms and a greenhouse rice experiment showed that the material bound arsenic to iron-bearing minerals, reduced soluble arsenic and limited its transfer into roots, stems, leaves and grain. The trade-off emerged because the iron also created more reducing conditions that favored methanogens, strengthening methane production more than methane oxidation. The results, reported in Frontiers in Environmental Science, show that an effective arsenic-remediation material can carry an important greenhouse-gas penalty that must be evaluated before broad use in flooded rice fields.</p>
<p>The experiments used surface soil collected from a paddy field in Ganzhou City, Jiangxi Province, China, where the total arsenic concentration was 36.9 milligrams per kilogram. That exceeded the Chinese risk-screening value of 30 milligrams per kilogram for paddy soils with a pH of 5.5 or lower. Researchers applied microscale zero-valent iron, or mZVI, at 1% by dry soil weight in both the microcosm and pot treatments, while untreated soil received the same fertilizer as a control. The microcosms were incubated anaerobically for 70 days and then aerobically, and the pots supported indica rice through a complete growing season in 2025. Each treatment had three replicates, limiting statistical power and making the findings evidence from a controlled experiment rather than a demonstration of performance across field conditions.</p>
<p>Arsenic release into water fell sharply after mZVI was added. On day 36 of anaerobic incubation, dissolved arsenic in the overlying water averaged 200.9 micrograms per liter in controls but only 12.5 micrograms per liter in amended microcosms, a reduction of 93.8%. At day 70, the respective concentrations were 93.6 and 8.89 micrograms per liter, corresponding to a 90.5% reduction. The difference persisted after oxygen exposure: on day 106, dissolved arsenic remained 29.9% lower with mZVI. Sequential extraction also showed that the treatment reduced the two most labile, operationally defined arsenic pools. Non-specifically adsorbed arsenic fell from 5.89% to 0.47% of total arsenic after anaerobic incubation, while specifically adsorbed arsenic declined from 13.2% to 8.63%. Following aerobic incubation, the corresponding values remained lower with mZVI: 0.24% for non-specifically adsorbed arsenic and 8.47% for specifically adsorbed arsenic, compared with 1.10% and 14.48% in controls.</p>
<p>The rice experiment extended the reduction in arsenic mobility to plant uptake. During cultivation, porewater arsenic remained below 10 micrograms per liter in mZVI-treated pots, whereas controls reached a maximum of 135 micrograms per liter. Iron remained elevated in amended porewater, rising as high as 64.5 milligrams per liter at day 27 and remaining at 28.9 to 38.2 milligrams per liter later in the season. MZVI increased porewater and overlying-water pH by 0.17–0.53 and 0.08–0.51 units, respectively, relative to controls, and maintained more negative oxidation-reduction potential throughout the rice-growing period. Its largest effect on that potential was a 367-millivolt decrease at day 48. These changes were consistent with active iron corrosion and the formation of secondary iron minerals that can retain arsenic through adsorption, coprecipitation and surface complexation. Dissolved organic carbon was also generally lower in amended porewater, by 50.8–105 milligrams per liter during incubation, although the researchers did not resolve how this difference contributed to methane production.</p>
<p>Arsenic concentrations decreased in every major rice tissue, with the greatest reductions in the above-ground portions and a smaller but still substantial reduction in edible grain. Compared with controls, mZVI lowered arsenic in roots, stems, leaves and grains by 83.3%, 92.9%, 87.4% and 34.0%, respectively. In brown rice from controls, inorganic arsenic accounted for 72.8% of total arsenic, with arsenic(V), dimethylarsinic acid and arsenic(III) accounting for 54.3%, 27.2% and 18.5%, respectively. MZVI reduced grain arsenic(V) by 68.2% and dimethylarsinic acid by 77.3%. Grain yield did not differ significantly, although rice biomass increased. The authors therefore found no evidence in this greenhouse trial that arsenic remediation required a sacrifice in grain production, but they did not quantify how much of the biomass increase arose from reduced arsenic toxicity, improved iron nutrition or a more favorable pH.</p>
<p>Direct analysis of the iron plaque on rice roots complicates a simple explanation based on greater surface retention. Dithionite-citrate-bicarbonate extraction showed that plaque iron increased from 17.8 to 52.7 grams per kilogram, but plaque-associated arsenic fell from 188 to 33.6 milligrams per kilogram. This pattern is consistent with mZVI restricting arsenic uptake primarily by lowering dissolved and labile arsenic in the soil rather than by accumulating more arsenic on root surfaces. The researchers attributed the contrast to differences in particle size, surface area, corrosion rate and iron-release kinetics among iron amendments. In particular, the relatively larger particles and lower specific surface area of mZVI may have limited direct contributions to rapid iron-plaque formation, while secondary iron minerals in the soil provided larger pools of arsenic-binding sites. Because the study did not measure the separate contributions of these pathways directly, that mechanism remains an interpretation supported by the combined observations.</p>
<p>Separating the treated soil into magnetic and non-magnetic fractions provided additional evidence that arsenic became associated with products of iron aging. The recovered magnetic material represented only 0.76% of the soil mass, yet it contained 127.7 milligrams of arsenic per kilogram, 3.23 times the concentration in non-magnetic soil, and 39.7 grams of iron per kilogram, 1.78 times as much. Magnetic particles retained 2.42% of the soil’s total arsenic and 1.35% of its total iron. Arsenic in this fraction was concentrated in the amorphous iron- and aluminum-oxide-associated fraction, which reached 96.1 milligrams per kilogram and was 11.2 times the corresponding concentration in untreated soil. The F4 concentration, representing arsenic associated with crystalline iron and aluminum oxides, reached 19.54 milligrams per kilogram in the magnetic fraction, compared with 14.7 milligrams per kilogram in the non-magnetic material. The results indicate that iron minerals formed as mZVI corrodes and ages can act as arsenic carriers, although the experiment did not establish how long that stability would persist under repeated field flooding and drainage.</p>
<p>The environmental cost appeared in the methane cycle. During anaerobic microcosm incubation, methane emissions began rising after 18 days with mZVI, compared with 24 days in controls, and peaked on day 50 at 108 micromoles per gram of dry soil. The control peaked at 86.4 micromoles per gram, making the amended peak 25% higher. At the end of anaerobic incubation on day 70, methane emissions were 31.4 micromoles per gram in controls and 36.6 micromoles per gram with mZVI. In the rice pots, porewater methane in the amended treatment reached 1,651 micromoles per liter at day 64 and subsequently remained within 1,522–1,651 micromoles per liter. Control porewater methane reached 2,890–3,166 micromoles per liter between days 79 and 94, whereas amended overlying water reached 191 micromoles per liter at day 79. The differing timing and concentrations mean the pot measurements cannot be read as a single uniform emission multiplier, but the microcosm experiment and microbial results together showed that mZVI shifted the balance toward net methane release. Aeration quickly reduced emissions in both treatments, and by day 78 the amended microcosms emitted 190 nanomoles per gram of dry soil per day versus 45.8 in controls.</p>
<p>Molecular and sequencing analyses identified changes in the organisms responsible for both methane production and methane consumption. In the 70-day microcosms, the abundance of the methanogenesis marker gene mcrA was approximately 2.49 times higher with mZVI, while the methane-oxidation marker pmoA was numerically higher but not significantly different from controls. In planted soil at maturity, both genes were significantly more abundant after amendment, reaching about 1.55 times the control level for mcrA and 1.43 times for pmoA. The amended soil also had higher bacterial richness and diversity, measured with the Chao1 and Shannon indices. Archaeal communities included Methanosarcina, Methanocella and Methanobacterium, while the type II methanotroph Methylocystis was enriched in treated soil. The balance suggests that methane oxidation did increase, but it was insufficient to offset stronger methanogenesis. More reducing conditions, relief from arsenic toxicity, altered organic-matter processing and potentially electron transfer through iron minerals were identified as possible contributors, but their individual contributions were not quantified.</p>
<p>The findings support mZVI as an effective laboratory amendment for arsenic immobilization and suggest that dry magnetic separation could recover some arsenic-bearing iron products, offering a partial route beyond stabilization alone. They also expose an unresolved sustainability problem: methane production was measured directly in soil incubation systems, not as complete field-scale emissions from flooded rice. Rice plants can transport methane through aerenchyma, and the study noted that plants may account for more than 90% of total emissions under some conditions, so the incubation measurements may not capture the dominant contribution of growing plants. The soil came from one field, each treatment had only three replicates, and arsenic speciation in soil and porewater, dissolved ferrous iron and total iron were not directly measured. These limitations prevented the researchers from quantitatively separating the roles of arsenic redox transformation, mZVI corrosion and iron reduction. Field testing with simultaneous measurements of arsenic species, iron transformations, plant-mediated methane transport and whole-system greenhouse-gas fluxes is needed before farmers can judge whether the contamination-control benefits outweigh the methane penalty.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Environmental effects of microscale zero-valent iron in arsenic-contaminated paddy soil and rice systems</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Microscale zero-valent iron creates a trade-off between arsenic remediation and methane emissions in paddy soil–rice systems</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kong, A., Wang, X., Peng, X., Zhou, Y., Liu, J., Li, J., &amp; Song, K. (2026). Microscale zero-valent iron creates a trade-off between arsenic remediation and methane emissions in paddy soil–rice systems. <em>Frontiers in Environmental Science, 14</em>, Article 1978292. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1978292" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1978292</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2026.1978292" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.3389/fenvs.2026.1978292</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> arsenic remediation, paddy soil, rice cultivation, methane emissions, zero-valent iron, methanogenesis, methanotrophs, soil biogeochemistry, iron minerals, greenhouse gas mitigation, Microscale, zero-valent</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">329275</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Faster-growing salt-loving microbes could make protein from biogas instead of natural gas</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/faster-growing-salt-loving-microbes-could-make-protein-from-biogas-instead-of-natural-gas/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Maddox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 16:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Science News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology and Engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alternative to traditional animal protein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogas to protein conversion technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogas-based microbial biomass]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[co-culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[essential amino acids]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[food sustainability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Komagataella phaffii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane fermentation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane-eating bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane-utilizing bacteria comparison]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanotrophs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methylococcus capsulatus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Methylomonas methanica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial fermentation using waste methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial growth under salty conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial protein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microbial protein from biogas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resource-efficient protein manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[salt-tolerant microbes for protein production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seawater-based microbial cultivation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[single-cell protein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable single-cell protein]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=276073</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ghent University researchers show that Methylomonas methanica co-cultured with Komagataella phaffii can outgrow the industrial standard Methylococcus capsulatus and reach 81 percent protein content in seawater-strength brine on unupgraded biogas.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A team of researchers at Ghent University has identified two methane-eating bacteria that may outperform the industrial workhorse of microbial protein production, opening a path toward protein grown on biogas and seawater rather than fossil natural gas and freshwater. The study, published in Frontiers in Chemical Engineering, systematically compared Methylosinus sp. and Methylomonas methanica against Methylococcus capsulatus, the species that underpins commercial products such as FeedKind. The results suggest that the conventional choice of microbe may not be the optimal one for a future in which protein is fermented from waste-derived methane under salty, less-than-ideal conditions.</p>
<p>Microbial protein, also called single-cell protein, is the protein-rich biomass of bacteria, yeasts, fungi or microalgae grown on substrates ranging from sugars to gases. Its appeal is rooted in stark resource arithmetic: producing protein this way requires roughly 40,000 times less land and 20 times less water than beef, while bacterial biomass can contain 50 to 82 percent protein by dry weight, approaching raw chicken and exceeding whole egg or soybean. Because bacteria can feed on gaseous carbon sources, methane from biogas offers a route that sidesteps the pesticides, heavy metals and pathogens that can contaminate liquid waste streams, since those contaminants do not survive the anaerobic digestion step that generates the gas.</p>
<p>The bottleneck has always been the microbe. Methane fermentation suffers from poor gas-to-liquid mass transfer, so methane growers tend to be slower and less productive than organisms fed soluble sugars. Methylococcus capsulatus, the incumbent, is also sensitive to impurities such as hydrogen sulfide, which effectively locks industrial processes into using natural gas or carefully upgraded biomethane rather than raw biogas. The Ghent team reasoned that alternative methane-oxidizing bacteria, or methanotrophs, might sidestep some of these constraints. Gamma-proteobacteria such as Methylomonas methanica use the ribulose monophosphate pathway for carbon assimilation, a biochemically more efficient route than the serine pathway, promising higher biomass yields and less wasted carbon and energy.</p>
<p>In head-to-head comparisons under identical gas fermentation conditions, the challengers delivered. Methylosinus sp. reached a maximum specific growth rate of 0.75 per hour, nearly 1.9 times that of M. capsulatus, while M. methanica achieved 0.65 per hour. Methylomonas methanica also produced a biomass concentration of 0.53 grams per liter, 2.5 times higher than the 0.21 grams per liter of the conventional species. There was a catch: M. capsulatus still made the most protein-dense biomass, at 58 percent of cell dry weight, compared with 45 percent for M. methanica and just 18 percent for Methylosinus sp. Fast growth, it turns out, tends to come at the expense of protein content, a trade-off that echoes broader principles of microbial physiology linking growth rate to macromolecular composition and cell size.</p>
<p>The researchers then asked whether co-cultivation could shift that balance. Methanotrophs release metabolic intermediates such as methanol, formate and acetate during methane oxidation, compounds that can accumulate and stress the methane growers themselves. Non-methanotrophic methylotrophs, which consume these one-carbon compounds, were proposed as cleanup crew. The team paired each methanotroph with two established biotechnology organisms: the methylotrophic bacterium Methylorubrum extorquens and the methylotrophic yeast Komagataella phaffii, formerly known as Pichia pastoris. The outcome was strikingly species-dependent. Co-cultures with M. capsulatus or Methylosinus sp. showed little change, but when M. methanica was grown with K. phaffii, the protein content of the mixed biomass rose significantly to 64 percent of cell dry weight, a 1.42-fold increase, without any loss of growth performance.</p>
<p>Protein quality improved as well. The essential amino acid content of the M. methanica and K. phaffii co-culture reached 126 grams per kilogram of cell dry weight, 1.27 times the pure culture value of 99 grams per kilogram, and well above the 87 grams per kilogram of the co-culture with M. extorquens. Benchmarking the biomass against common foods, the researchers calculated that 111 grams of the co-culture product, with lysine as the limiting amino acid, would cover an adult&#8217;s daily essential amino acid requirements, compared with 148 grams of pure M. methanica and 258 grams of the M. extorquens co-culture. The co-culture biomass also contained a higher fraction of sulfur-containing amino acids such as methionine, at 6 percent of essential amino acids versus 4 percent in soybean meal, which is often deficient in this respect. Notably, because protein content is expressed relative to total dry biomass, the increase cannot be explained simply by adding yeast cells, hinting at genuinely altered carbon allocation whose mechanism remains to be unraveled.</p>
<p>The most eye-catching result came from stressing the winning bacterium with salt. When the medium was supplemented with 20 grams of sodium chloride per liter, the protein content of M. methanica jumped to 81 percent of cell dry weight, 1.8 times the salt-free control, while growth rates and biomass concentrations were barely affected across salt levels from 10 to 35 grams per liter. The 35 gram per liter condition approximates seawater, meaning the organism, originally isolated from a seawater enrichment culture, can grow protein in ocean-strength brine. That matters because saline cultivation could let future factories use brackish water, desalination brines or seawater instead of scarce freshwater, and high salt also suppresses contaminating microbes, easing sterility demands. The mechanism likely involves osmotic adaptation reshaping cellular composition, but the researchers caution that targeted compositional analyses are needed to pin down what is actually changing inside the cells.</p>
<p>The study also tackled the question of feedstock purity, with consequences for process sustainability. When M. methanica was grown on synthetic biogas, a methane and carbon dioxide mixture of 65 and 35 percent by volume, the protein content of the biomass rose 1.5-fold compared with purified methane, and protein yields per unit of methane consumed climbed from 0.37 to 0.56 grams of protein per gram of methane. Real biogas from a local maize farm, containing 78 percent methane, boosted protein content 1.3-fold and yields to 0.40 grams per gram. Crucially, pH remained stable in the biogas cultures and methane was never limiting, so the effect appears tied to the altered gas composition itself rather than to acidification or starvation. Because raw biogas contains carbon dioxide that purified methane does not, the result suggests that skipping the energy-intensive biogas upgrading step could actually improve product quality, a counterintuitive bonus for circular-economy schemes that convert organic waste to methane and then to food.</p>
<p>The trade-offs were equally illuminating on the pH front. When the researchers allowed the medium to acidify from around pH 6.8 down to 4.6 during growth, biomass concentration collapsed to about a quarter of the pH-controlled value, but the protein content of what biomass remained rose to 45 percent of cell dry weight, 1.55 times the pH-controlled level of 29 percent. Because total protein productivity depends on both biomass and protein fraction, pH-controlled cultivation still won on overall protein output, achieving 2.7 milligrams of protein per liter per hour versus 1.1 without control. The broader lesson is that upstream cultivation choices, from species selection to pH strategy to salinity to gas composition, act as adjustable dials that shift the balance between how much biomass a bioreactor produces and how protein-rich that biomass is.</p>
<p>Caveats remain before any of this reaches a dinner plate. The experiments were run in sealed serum bottles at small scale, where gas-liquid mass transfer, mixing and oxygen availability differ substantially from industrial bioreactors, so the performance gains cannot be directly extrapolated to production. Methylomonas methanica and its co-culture partner would also face a complete safety evaluation and regulatory approval pathway, something M. capsulatus has already cleared in both the European Union and the United States. The researchers note that biogas impurities such as hydrogen sulfide and ammonia were not fully assessed, although sulfur impurities could conceivably enrich the biomass in sulfur amino acids. Still, the study delivers the first quantitative comparison of these fast-growing methanotrophs against the industrial standard, and it sketches a concrete recipe for a future protein factory: Methyomonas methanica fermented with Komagataella phaffii, on unupgraded biogas, in saltwater, tuning the dials of stress and partnership to match the market&#8217;s demand for either volume or quality.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Microbial protein production from biogas using alternative methanotrophic bacteria and methylotrophic co-cultures under saline conditions</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Methylomonas methanica and Methylosinus sp. co-cultivated with methylotrophs under saline conditions for microbial protein production from biogas as alternatives to natural-gas- based production using Methylococcus capsulatus</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kerckhof, F.-M., Benmeridja, N., Rabaey, K., Boon, N., De Vrieze, J., &amp; Sakarika, M. (2026). Methylomonas methanica and Methylosinus sp. co-cultivated with methylotrophs under saline conditions for microbial protein production from biogas as alternatives to natural-gas- based production using Methylococcus capsulatus. <em>Frontiers in Chemical Engineering, 8</em>, Article 1912929. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fceng.2026.1912929" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.3389/fceng.2026.1912929</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fceng.2026.1912929" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.3389/fceng.2026.1912929</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> microbial protein, methanotrophs, Methylomonas methanica, Methylococcus capsulatus, biogas, co-culture, Komagataella phaffii, salinity, single-cell protein, food sustainability, methane fermentation, essential amino acids</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">276073</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silicon fertilizer could turn rice paddies into methane-fighting climate allies</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/silicon-fertilizer-could-turn-rice-paddies-into-methane-fighting-climate-allies/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 12:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anoxic soil zones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate-friendly agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate-smart agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flooded rice soil chemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas mitigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovative climate change mitigation strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane emission reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanogenic archaea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanogens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanotrophs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial community influence on greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial soil regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nationally determined contributions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice paddies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice paddies methane mitigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silicon fertilization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon fertilizer in rice paddies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silicon-mediated microbial climate regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slag recycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil biogeochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbiome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable intensification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable rice farming practices]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=267867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new opinion paper in Plant and Soil proposes that silicon fertilization reshapes paddy soil microbes to suppress methane emissions and should be recognized as a climate-smart tool in national climate policy.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rice feeds more than half of humanity, yet the flooded fields it depends on are among agriculture&#8217;s most stubborn sources of methane, a greenhouse gas roughly eighty times more potent than carbon dioxide over a twenty-year horizon. A new opinion paper published in the journal Plant and Soil argues that a largely overlooked element sitting in plain sight—silicon—could help break this deadlock. The authors, led by Suvendu Das of Gyeongsang National University in South Korea, together with Jagadeesh Yeluripati of the James Hutton Institute in Scotland and colleagues, propose a conceptual framework they call Silicon-Mediated Microbial Climate Regulation, or SiMCR. Their central claim is provocative: silicon fertilization does not merely strengthen rice plants against pests and lodging, as agronomists have long assumed, but actively reshapes the soil microbial communities that decide how much methane escapes from paddy water into the atmosphere.</p>
<p>The mechanistic story begins with the peculiar chemistry of flooded rice soils. When a paddy is submerged, oxygen diffusion into the soil is sharply restricted, creating anoxic zones where archaea known as methanogens thrive. These microorganisms decompose organic matter—residues from previous crops, straw incorporated into the soil, root exudates—and release methane as a metabolic byproduct. The gas then diffuses upward, mostly through the aerenchyma, the air-conducting tissue that rice roots use to survive waterlogging, and escapes into the air. Counteracting this process are methanotrophs, bacteria that consume methane in the oxygenated zones surrounding rice roots. The net emission from any given field is therefore a balance between methane production and methane oxidation, and that balance is governed by the composition and activity of the rhizosphere microbiome.</p>
<p>This is where silicon enters the picture. Rice is a pronounced silicon accumulator; the element is transported from the soil through dedicated transporters, first identified in rice in 2006, and deposited as amorphous silica in leaves, stems, and husks. Decades of research, particularly in Japan and more recently across tropical Asia, have documented silicon&#8217;s agronomic benefits: thicker cuticles, improved resistance to fungal pathogens such as brown spot, reduced lodging, and higher grain yields. But the authors argue that this plant-centric view has blinded the research community to a parallel, subterranean effect. When silicate fertilizers—often derived from recycled industrial slags—are applied to paddies, they dissolve into bioavailable silicate that alters soil pH, competes with phosphate for adsorption sites, and changes the redox dynamics of the rhizosphere. Each of these shifts ripples through the microbial food web.</p>
<p>The evidence for a climate effect comes from a series of field and laboratory studies conducted by the same research group and collaborators. Work published in Environment International in 2019 showed that slag-based silicate fertilizer amendments produced measurable taxonomic and functional shifts in paddy soil microbial communities. A 2022 study in the Journal of Cleaner Production dissected the mechanism by which slag-based silicate fertilizer suppresses methane emissions from paddies, and subsequent papers have reported reduced methane fluxes alongside maintained or increased rice productivity in Korean paddies. Related work suggests additional climate co-benefits: silicate amendments appear to suppress nitrous oxide emissions under certain moisture regimes, and long-term application has been linked to increases in soil organic carbon stocks, meaning the fertilizer may simultaneously cut emissions and lock carbon into the soil.</p>
<p>The proposed SiMCR framework ties these observations into a single mechanistic chain. Applied silicon, the authors contend, modulates the rhizosphere in ways that favor methane-oxidizing bacteria relative to methane-producing archaea, while also influencing the availability of electron acceptors such as iron that determine which metabolic pathways dominate in anoxic soil. Silicon deposited in plant tissue may further alter the quantity and composition of root exudates—the carbon compounds that feed methanogens—thereby starving methane production at its source. The framework is deliberately presented as a hypothesis-generating structure rather than a settled conclusion; the authors acknowledge that the precise microbial taxa and functional genes involved, and the conditions under which suppression is strongest, remain active questions for the research community.</p>
<p>What makes the paper unusual is its pivot from soil science to policy. The authors argue that disciplinary silos and entrenched soil fertility paradigms have kept silicon–microbe interactions out of mainstream climate-smart agriculture, while a policy preference for high-tech solutions—precision sensors, engineered microbes, novel chemistry—has diverted attention from a cheap, scalable, nature-based intervention. They call for quality-screened silicon fertilizers to be formally recognized as climate-smart soil amendments and for their inclusion in national climate action plans, specifically the Nationally Determined Contributions that countries submit under the Paris Agreement. The Food and Agriculture Organization&#8217;s 2025 global analysis of agrifood systems in these pledges provides the backdrop: agriculture remains underrepresented in methane mitigation commitments relative to its emissions footprint, and rice cultivation is one of the largest agricultural methane sources after livestock.</p>
<p>The recycling angle adds a circular-economy dimension that may strengthen the policy case. Many effective silicate fertilizers are manufactured from steelmaking slags, industrial byproducts that would otherwise accumulate as waste. Converting slag into a soil amendment that boosts yields, suppresses methane, and potentially immobilizes heavy metals in contaminated paddies addresses three problems at once, though the authors and prior reviews caution that slag quality must be screened to avoid introducing contaminants. The European Input List criteria for fertilizers and soil conditioners, updated in 2024, illustrate the kind of regulatory scaffolding the authors say is needed to distinguish quality-assured products from uncharacterized industrial waste.</p>
<p>Independent experts in silicon biology will likely note that the field has seen genuine controversies. Whether silicon is a truly essential plant nutrient or, as some researchers describe it, a beneficial quasi-essential element has been debated for years, and the magnitude of methane suppression varies with soil type, water management, straw management, and fertilizer composition. Recent work on straw return combined with silicon fertilization suggests practical synergies—silicon application can allow reduced nitrogen inputs while maintaining yield and lodging resistance—but generalizing results from Korean and Vietnamese paddies to the diverse rice systems of South and Southeast Asia will require broader field trials. The authors themselves frame SiMCR as a call for multidisciplinary research agendas spanning rhizosphere microbiology, soil biogeochemistry, and agronomy, rather than as a finished prescription.</p>
<p>The stakes are considerable. Rice paddies account for a substantial share of anthropogenic methane emissions, and demand for rice is projected to rise with population growth across Asia and Africa. Conventional mitigation options each carry trade-offs: mid-season drainage saves water and cuts methane but can increase nitrous oxide and complicate water management; cultivar selection is slow; straw removal or burning creates air pollution problems of its own. A soil amendment that integrates into existing fertilization practice, recycles industrial waste, and acts through natural microbial processes would be an unusually low-friction addition to the mitigation toolkit. The paper&#8217;s authors put it bluntly in their conclusion: without deliberately incorporating silicon–microbe interactions into both research and policy frameworks, the goal of genuinely climate-smart rice systems will remain out of reach, and urgent action is needed to unlock this neglected nexus for global food and climate security.</p>
<p>Whether SiMCR matures into a policy instrument or remains a compelling hypothesis will depend on the next phase of evidence: replicated field trials across rice-growing regions, identification of the microbial indicators that reliably predict methane suppression, and cost-benefit analyses that account for slag supply chains and regulatory screening. But the paper has already succeeded in reframing the question. Silicon, long treated as a plant-strengthening afterthought, is now on the table as a lever for microbial climate regulation—one of the few proposed interventions that could, in principle, help rice farmers grow more food while emitting less methane from the same flooded fields their ancestors have cultivated for millennia.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Silicon-mediated microbial regulation of methane emissions in rice paddy soils</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Silicon-mediated microbial climate regulation: a new conceptual framework for climate policy and sustainable rice intensification</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Das, S., Yeluripati, J., Seo, Y. H., &amp; Kim, P. J. (2026). Silicon-mediated microbial climate regulation: a new conceptual framework for climate policy and sustainable rice intensification. <em>Plant and Soil</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09055-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09055-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-026-09055-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11104-026-09055-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> silicon fertilization, rice paddies, methane emissions, soil microbiome, methanogens, methanotrophs, climate-smart agriculture, greenhouse gas mitigation, slag recycling, Nationally Determined Contributions, soil biogeochemistry, sustainable intensification</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">267867</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>African Lakes Turn Out to Be Methane Devourers, Not Just Methane Makers</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/african-lakes-turn-out-to-be-methane-devourers-not-just-methane-makers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 11:18:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African lakes methane cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon cycle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congo Basin wetlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eutrophication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of lake microbial processes on climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lake sediment methane release]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large-scale African lake methane study]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limnology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limnology and greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane emissions from African lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane fate in surface waters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane oxidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane paradox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane paradox in freshwater ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanotrophs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial communities and methane degradation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial methane consumption in lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Communications.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxic methane production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygenated lake surface waters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phytoplankton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[role of microbes in greenhouse gas mitigation]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=253465</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A study of 79 African lakes shows that methane-oxidizing bacteria, boosted by phytoplankton and wetland inputs, consume more than 70 percent of surface methane and outweigh photosynthesis-driven methane production.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lakes have long carried a reputation as quiet climate villains. Beneath their surfaces, microbes break down organic matter in oxygen-starved sediments and release methane, a greenhouse gas that traps heat far more effectively than carbon dioxide over short timescales. Yet the full picture of what happens to that methane before it reaches the atmosphere has remained stubbornly incomplete. Now, a large-scale study of 79 African lakes, published in Nature Communications by Alberto V. Borges of the University of Liège, Cédric Morana of KU Leuven and their colleagues, offers one of the most comprehensive assessments to date of the processes that govern methane&#8217;s fate in lake surface waters. The findings challenge a growing assumption in limnology and suggest that the microbial communities living in productive lakes may be far better at destroying methane than scientists had appreciated.</p>
<p>The central puzzle the researchers set out to address is often called the methane paradox. Methane is classically produced in the anoxic depths of lakes, where archaea ferment organic material in the absence of oxygen. For decades, the prevailing view held that surface waters, being well oxygenated, should contain little methane and that any methane found there must have simply diffused upward from below. But measurements kept revealing supersaturated methane in oxygen-rich surface layers, implying that methane was somehow being generated in place. One proposed mechanism is oxic methane production, or OMP, in which methane is created as a by-product of microbial metabolism in the light. In particular, some cyanobacteria and other phytoplankton convert methylphosphonate and other methylated compounds into methane during photosynthesis, meaning that algal blooms could, in principle, be manufacturing greenhouse gas right at the lake surface.</p>
<p>If that photosynthesis-driven production were large enough, eutrophication, the over-enrichment of waters with nutrients that fuels algal blooms worldwide, would make lakes progressively worse methane emitters. The new study puts that worry in a broader and more nuanced context. Across the 79 lakes, which span enormous gradients in size, depth, nutrient status and productivity, Borges and colleagues found that the single largest fate of dissolved methane in the sunlit mixed layer is not emission to the atmosphere but microbial methane oxidation, known as MOX. More than 70 percent of the dissolved methane in the mixed layer is consumed by methane-oxidizing bacteria before it can escape, dwarfing the fraction that diffuses across the water surface into the air.</p>
<p>The technical logic behind this conclusion rests on careful budgeting of the mixed layer, the uppermost, wind-stirred portion of the lake where most exchange with the atmosphere occurs. The team compared the rates at which methane entered the mixed layer from deeper anoxic waters and from in situ production against the rates at which it left, either by diffusive emission across the air-water interface or by consumption by methanotrophs. Methane-oxidizing bacteria, or methanotrophs, use methane as their carbon and energy source, converting it first to methanol and ultimately to carbon dioxide and microbial biomass. Because carbon dioxide is a far weaker greenhouse agent per molecule than methane over century-scale horizons, this microbial conversion effectively downgrades the climate impact of the gas. The study&#8217;s mass balance shows that this biological filter is the dominant sink, not a marginal correction.</p>
<p>Perhaps the most striking pattern in the data is that methane oxidation rates are highest in the most productive lakes, those teeming with phytoplankton. This seems counterintuitive at first glance, because productive lakes are also the settings where photosynthesis-driven oxic methane production is expected to be strongest. The authors propose a mechanism that reconciles the two observations: methanotrophs appear to attach themselves to phytoplankton cells and colonies. In nutrient-rich waters, algae provide physical surfaces and perhaps exuded organic substrates that methanotrophic bacteria can exploit, allowing dense methanotroph populations to develop in exactly the waters where methane concentrations are elevated. In other words, the very blooms that may generate methane in the light also cultivate the bacteria that devour it, and the consumption side of the ledger grows faster than the production side.</p>
<p>Geography added a second, independent control on oxidation rates. The team found that methane oxidation was also elevated in lakes that drain the vast wetlands of the Congo Basin, a landscape of flooded forests and seasonally inundated plains. The likely explanation is that these lakes receive regular inputs of methanotrophic bacteria exported from the waterlogged forest soils upstream. Flooded soils are hotspots of both methane production and methane consumption, and the microbial communities adapted to living there appear to be carried into the receiving lakes, seeding them with oxidation capacity. This hydrological subsidy means that the microbial composition of a lake&#8217;s catchment, not just its internal chemistry, shapes how much methane survives to reach the atmosphere.</p>
<p>To evaluate the importance of photosynthesis-driven oxic methane production, the researchers drew on estimates compiled from the published literature and compared them against their own measurements of methane oxidation and diffusive emissions across the African lake dataset. The result was unambiguous: photosynthesis-driven OMP represents only a small fraction of both MOX and the diffusive methane emission, and that fraction shrinks as lake productivity and emission intensity increase. In other words, in the lakes where algal production is most vigorous and where methane cycling is most intense, the methane made in the light is a minor term in the budget, easily overtaken by the methane destroyed by bacteria. The fraction of OMP relative to the other fluxes is largest only in the least productive, most dilute systems, where all methane fluxes are small in absolute terms.</p>
<p>This scaling has direct implications for how scientists project the climate consequences of eutrophication. Freshwater ecosystems contribute a substantial share of global natural methane emissions, and as agricultural runoff and warming continue to fertilize lakes, many researchers had feared a runaway amplification: more blooms, more photosynthetic methane production, more emissions. The African lake data suggest a built-in brake. Because methane oxidation increases with phytoplankton biomass, the additional oxic methane production supported by eutrophication can be compensated, and apparently more than compensated, by a stronger increase in bacterial consumption. Available evidence, as the authors carefully phrase it, indicates that the net effect of enrichment on surface-water methane may be far less dire than the production-side argument alone would predict.</p>
<p>The study also carries methodological weight for the field. Much of the literature on the methane paradox has rested on a limited number of lakes, often in Europe and North America, frequently shallow and heavily studied systems. By sampling 79 lakes across a continent, including iconic East African water bodies worked on with partners in Uganda, Tanzania and the Democratic Republic of the Congo, the team captured a breadth of trophic and morphological variation that smaller studies cannot. The involvement of researchers from the National Fisheries Resources Research Institute in Jinja, the Tanzania Fisheries Research Institute, Makerere University and the Institut Supérieur Pédagogique de la Gombe reflects the kind of long-term regional collaboration needed to constrain biogeochemical cycles at scales relevant to global budgets. The work was funded by the Belgian Federal Science Policy Office and the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique, among other sources.</p>
<p>There remain, of course, important caveats. Methane oxidation rates are difficult to measure directly and depend on community composition, temperature, oxygen and copper availability, factors that vary seasonally and between lakes. The comparison of photosynthesis-driven OMP against field measurements relies on literature-derived estimates rather than uniform in situ measurements across all sites, a limitation the authors acknowledge. Ebullition, the bubbling of methane from sediments that bypasses the mixed layer entirely, is another pathway that can dominate emissions in shallow systems and was not the focus of this surface-layer budget. Nonetheless, the broad conclusion stands on firm ground: across a continental scale of African lakes, methane-oxidizing bacteria, thriving alongside phytoplankton and imported from methane-rich wetlands, consume the majority of the methane in surface waters. For a planet trying to account for every molecule of a potent greenhouse gas, that microbial appetite, and its tendency to grow with lake productivity, is a piece of good news buried in the mud.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Methane oxidation and oxic methane production in African lake surface waters</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Methane oxidation in African lakes increases with phytoplankton and outweighs photosynthesis-driven oxic methane production</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Borges, A. V., Morana, C., Deirmendjian, L., Okello, W., Isumbisho, P., Omeja, P., Kimirei, I. A., Descy, J.-P., Champenois, W., &amp; Bouillon, S. (2026). Methane oxidation in African lakes increases with phytoplankton and outweighs photosynthesis-driven oxic methane production. <em>Nature Communications</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-78255-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-78255-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-78255-9" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1038/s41467-026-78255-9</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> methane oxidation, African lakes, phytoplankton, oxic methane production, methanotrophs, greenhouse gas, eutrophication, Congo Basin wetlands, limnology, carbon cycle, Nature Communications, methane paradox</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">253465</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Half the Straw, Full Fertility: The Sweet Spot for Climate-Smart Rice Farming</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/half-the-straw-full-fertility-the-sweet-spot-for-climate-smart-rice-farming/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan Morgan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 20:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balancing crop yield and climate impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate-smart agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate-smart rice farming practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[denitrification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming potential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas emissions from rice paddies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas mitigation in rice farming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integrated crop residue management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[long-term field trials in agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanotrophs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mid-range straw incorporation benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nitrous oxide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paddy soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice cultivation environmental impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rice straw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rice straw management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil carbon sequestration in rice paddies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil fertility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil fertility enhancement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil microbiology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable agriculture techniques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sustainable farming]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=249281</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A five-year field and laboratory study shows that incorporating half of the harvested rice straw boosts paddy soil fertility while adding only about 3 percent to global warming potential, thanks to methane-oxidizing and nitrous oxide-consuming microbes.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rice feeds nearly half of humanity, but every harvest leaves behind a mountain of straw—somewhere between 800 million and 1 billion tonnes each year. Farmers have long faced a dilemma: plow that straw back into the paddy to feed the soil, or remove it to avoid supercharging greenhouse gas emissions. A new study published in the journal SOIL suggests the answer is neither extreme but a carefully calibrated middle ground. Incorporating just half of the harvested straw, researchers found, measurably improved soil fertility while adding only about 3 percent to the global warming potential of the paddy—a negligible rise compared with the dramatic increases triggered by heavier applications.</p>
<p>The research team, led by Mengxue Zhang and Rong Sheng of the Institute of Subtropical Agriculture at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, built their experiment on a five-year field trial at the Taoyuan Agroecosystem Research Station in Hunan Province. There, plots had received straw at rates corresponding to 0, 50, 100, and 150 percent of the local rice straw yield. To isolate the biological mechanisms from the noise of weather and field variability, the scientists brought soil from each plot into the laboratory and ran controlled microcosm incubations lasting 91 days, with a 28-day flooded period followed by 63 days of drying—mirroring the wet-dry rhythm of a real rice season.</p>
<p>The fertility results were unambiguous. Five years of straw return had left its signature on the soil: bulk density fell, while cation exchange capacity, total carbon, total nitrogen, available nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium all climbed with increasing straw rates. Even the lowest input, the half-rate treatment, cut bulk density by nearly 3 percent and lifted available potassium by more than 38 percent, available phosphorus by about 15 percent, and available nitrogen by nearly 7 percent relative to the no-straw control. Micronutrients such as manganese, copper, and zinc also rose. In short, the soil was demonstrably better at holding water, nutrients, and cations—the hallmarks of fertility.</p>
<p>But the greenhouse gas picture told a sharply different story depending on dose. Carbon dioxide fluxes rose in proportion to the straw input, with the half-rate treatment emitting 66 percent more CO2 than the control and the full and 150-percent rates reaching 2.2 and 2.5 times the control level. Methane, the more potent concern, was even more dose-sensitive: cumulative emissions from the half-rate treatment stayed low at 4.41 grams per square meter, while the full-rate and 150-percent treatments belched out roughly 23 and 38 grams per square meter—four and eight times higher, respectively. When the researchers converted all three gases into a single global warming potential metric using the latest 100-year conversion factors, the half-rate treatment showed only a 3 percent, statistically insignificant increase over the control, whereas the higher rates inflated the warming potential by up to 151 percent.</p>
<p>The key to this asymmetry lay in nitrous oxide, a greenhouse gas nearly 273 times more powerful than CO2 over a century. Counterintuitively, the half-rate treatment emitted significantly less N2O than the unfertilized-with-straw control—just 1.63 grams per square meter. The explanation emerged from the microbial genes the team quantified. N2O is produced by denitrifiers carrying the nirS and nirK genes and consumed by microbes carrying nosZ-type genes encoding N2O reductase. The half-rate soil harbored the highest abundance of the nosZII clade and the lowest nirS-to-nosZII ratio of any treatment, around 0.81 compared with 1.11 to 1.36 elsewhere. That combination—modest production capacity paired with maximal consumption capacity—meant the soil was effectively eating its own N2O before it could escape.</p>
<p>The timing of emissions added further nuance. Two distinct N2O peaks appeared during the incubation: one about 11 days after fertilization under flooded conditions, and another during the late drying phase. At the first peak, the control plot emitted the most N2O, likely because urea nitrogen sat available for nitrifiers and denitrifiers, while in straw-amended soils proliferating microbes competed fiercely for that same nitrogen. At the second peak, during drying, the order reversed as oxygen penetrated the profile and organic matter mineralization released fresh nitrogen. Yet even here, the half-rate soil kept its N2O fluxes as low as the control&#8217;s, thanks to its superior N2O-reducing community.</p>
<p>Methane told its own mechanistic tale. Methanogens, flagged by the mcrA gene, multiplied in proportion to straw input, with average abundances during the flux period rising 32 percent at the half rate and 129 percent at the highest rate. But production alone does not determine emissions—consumption by methanotrophs carrying the pmoA gene matters just as much. The researchers identified a critical threshold: a soil methane holding capacity of roughly 190 millimoles per mole under anaerobic conditions. Below that ceiling, retained methane could be oxidized in place; above it, the excess escaped to the atmosphere. The half-rate treatment&#8217;s soil methane concentrations fluctuated right around 200 millimoles per mole, hovering at the edge, while the higher rates blew well past the capacity. Meanwhile, the half-rate soil boasted methanotroph abundances about 81 percent higher than the control, giving it the oxidative muscle to mop up most of what its methanogens produced.</p>
<p>The broader significance of these findings is considerable. Rice cultivation accounts for roughly 12 percent of global agricultural greenhouse gas emissions, and straw incorporation has been identified as one of the key drivers, with reported methane increases in prior studies ranging from 23 percent to a staggering 1,192 percent. By demonstrating that the dose of straw—not merely its presence—governs the climate outcome, the study offers farmers and policymakers a concrete, actionable target: return about half the harvest. Previous work had hinted at this, showing that half-rate incorporation cut methane emissions by 48 percent relative to full incorporation, but the new research goes further by tying the climate benefit to specific microbial mechanisms and by simultaneously confirming that fertility gains are preserved.</p>
<p>The study also resolves a long-standing controversy in the literature. Reports on how straw affects N2O emissions have swung wildly, from 73 percent reductions to 137 percent increases, and the abundances of N2O-related genes have been reported to rise, fall, or remain unchanged. The Hunan results suggest that much of this inconsistency may stem from differing straw application rates across studies, which shift the balance between N2O-producing nirS communities and N2O-consuming nosZII communities in opposite directions. Similarly, conflicting findings on methanotroph responses—some studies found no change in pmoA abundance, others increases of up to 59 percent—may reflect the same dose dependence.</p>
<p>The authors caution that their conclusions come from a single soil type, an acidic Ultisol derived from quaternary red clay under a subtropical monsoon climate. Different soils possess different methane holding capacities and nitrogen transformation dynamics, so field tests across diverse soil types remain necessary before the half-rate prescription can be generalized worldwide. Still, the core message stands as a rare piece of good news in agricultural climate science: with the right amount of straw, rice paddies can grow more fertile without growing warmer, turning an agricultural waste problem into a climate-smart resource.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Optimal rice straw incorporation rates for balancing paddy soil fertility and greenhouse gas emissions</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Mechanisms of enhancing soil fertility without obviously elevating global warming potential under an optimal rice straw incorporation rate in a paddy soil</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Zhang, M., Liao, R., Zhang, W., Fang, C., Guerrero-Cruz, S., Táncsics, A., Zhu, B., Wei, W., &amp; Sheng, R. (2026). Mechanisms of enhancing soil fertility without obviously elevating global warming potential under an optimal rice straw incorporation rate in a paddy soil. <em>SOIL, 12</em>(2), 871-883. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-12-871-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-12-871-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/soil-12-871-2026" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.5194/soil-12-871-2026</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> rice straw, paddy soil, soil fertility, greenhouse gases, methane, nitrous oxide, methanotrophs, denitrification, global warming potential, climate-smart agriculture, soil microbiology, sustainable farming</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">249281</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Volcanic Lakes on a Remote Atlantic Island Reveal How Microbes Steer Greenhouse Gas Emissions</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/volcanic-lakes-on-a-remote-atlantic-island-reveal-how-microbes-steer-greenhouse-gas-emissions/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 10:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azores]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Azores archipelago geology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogeochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide and methane fluxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[carbon dioxide flux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DNA sequencing of lake sediments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eutrophication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flores Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gas emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hydrothermal carbon sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lake emissions control mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lake stratification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maar lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanotrophs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial communities in lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial influence on greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural laboratories for climate research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Volcanic crater lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volcanic island ecosystems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volcanic lake biogeochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volcanic lakes]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=240946</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A year-round study of three crater lakes on Flores Island in the Azores shows that microbial communities and seasonal lake mixing, rather than volcanic degassing, control the carbon dioxide and methane these lakes release to the atmosphere.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>High in the caldera of Flores Island, the westernmost island of the Azores archipelago, three crater lakes sit quietly in maars blasted out by eruptions a little more than three thousand years ago. They look like postcard scenery, but a new study shows they are also natural laboratories for understanding how lakes breathe out greenhouse gases. Researchers from the University of the Azores, the University of Florence and partner institutions spent a full year sampling the Comprida, Negra and Funda lakes, combining geochemical measurements of carbon dioxide and methane fluxes with cutting-edge DNA sequencing of the microbial communities living in the lake sediments. Their findings, published in Environmental Earth Sciences, reveal that even in volcanic terrain, biology rather than geology largely controls what these lakes release to the atmosphere.</p>
<p>The choice of study site was deliberate. Volcanic lakes are usually treated as special cases in greenhouse gas budgets because they can receive magmatic and hydrothermal carbon from below, potentially inflating their emissions far above those of ordinary lakes. The Azores, with active volcanism and widespread hydrothermal manifestations, is an ideal place to test how much of a lake&#8217;s carbon output is geological and how much is biological. Previous work across the archipelago estimated that 45 Azorean lakes together emit roughly 171,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide per year, of which about 42 percent was attributed to volcanic origin. But the Flores lakes had only been measured once before, leaving large uncertainties, and their methane emissions had never been quantified at all.</p>
<p>The three lakes differ dramatically despite sitting within a few kilometers of each other inside the Seven Lakes Caldera. Comprida is the smallest and shallowest, just 14.3 meters deep with a surface area of 0.06 square kilometers, occupying an elongated maar formed by a row of at least five craters during a single eruption dated to 3,180 calibrated years before present. Negra, formed in the same eruption, is the deepest lake in the entire Azores at 119 meters, with water that can linger for 17 years before being flushed out. Funda, the largest at 0.38 square kilometers, lies in a steep-walled maar created by a phreatomagmatic eruption around 3,250 years ago and drains a watershed more than eight times its own surface area. These differences in depth, volume and residence time turned out to matter enormously for how the lakes behave chemically and biologically.</p>
<p>The team conducted four field surveys between May 2023 and February 2024, capturing the full seasonal cycle of these monomictic lakes, which stratify thermally in summer and mix completely in winter. They measured diffuse carbon dioxide flux using a static floating chamber equipped with an infrared detector, mapping the lake surfaces point by point, and applied both the Graphical Statistical Approach and sequential Gaussian simulation to convert those measurements into total lake-wide emission estimates. For methane, they deployed floating chambers along transects during the November and February surveys and also calculated theoretical fluxes from dissolved gas concentrations using a thin boundary layer model, finding the two methods agreed closely. Water chemistry was profiled at depth intervals in every lake, and sediment cores were collected for microbial analysis using full-length 16S rRNA gene sequencing on a PacBio platform.</p>
<p>The headline numbers show that carbon dioxide dominates these systems by two to three orders of magnitude over methane. Funda Lake emerged as the strongest emitter, releasing about 1.06 tonnes of carbon dioxide per day during the first survey and 1.02 tonnes during the second, while Comprida and Negra released at most around 0.39 and 0.22 tonnes per day respectively. Yet crucially, none of the measured fluxes came close to the threshold of 35 grams per square meter per day above which a magmatic contribution cannot be excluded. Carbon isotope data reinforced this conclusion: the delta-13C values of dissolved inorganic carbon in all three lakes were more negative than both the atmospheric and mantle signatures, pointing to a biogenic origin for the escaping carbon dioxide rather than a deep volcanic source.</p>
<p>Seasonality left a clear fingerprint on the emissions. Carbon dioxide fluxes were consistently lower during the August survey than in May, a counterintuitive result the researchers attribute to warmer surface waters boosting photosynthetic activity, which strips dissolved carbon dioxide from the water before it can escape. In eutrophic lakes this effect can be strong enough to push surface waters below atmospheric equilibrium, turning them into temporary carbon dioxide sinks. Methane behaved differently: fluxes were two to three times higher during the November survey, when Negra and Funda were still stratified and bottom waters were warm, than in February after full mixing. Warmer sediments favor methane-producing archaea, so the stratified autumn conditions gave methanogenesis a head start that winter mixing then erased.</p>
<p>The microbial data provide the mechanistic explanation for these patterns. In summer, Negra Lake was dominated by autotrophic Nostocaceae, cyanobacteria that fix carbon dioxide through photosynthesis, consistent with its relatively low surface fluxes. Meanwhile Comprida and Funda harbored abundant fermentative taxa such as Clostridiaceae and Enterobacteriaceae, which break down organic matter anaerobically and release carbon dioxide in deeper sediments. When winter mixing broke down the stratification in Negra and Funda, the microbial balance shifted sharply: fermenters, sulfate-reducing Desulfatiglandaceae and syntrophic Syntrophaceae all surged, indicating intensified anaerobic respiration and a potential pulse of carbon dioxide from sediments that had been accumulating organic matter under oxygen-poor conditions.</p>
<p>Methane cycling followed its own microbial logic. In Funda Lake, syntrophic families that feed methanogens, including Smithellaceae, Syntrophaceae and Syntrophorhabdaceae, were already well established during summer stratification and grew further in winter, but so did Methylomonadaceae, aerobic bacteria that oxidize methane. The researchers suggest that winter mixing oxygenates deeper water, giving methanotrophs the oxygen they need to consume methane before it reaches the surface, which helps explain the lower winter fluxes. Comprida Lake told a different story: syntrophic groups were scarce, but methane-oxidizing Methylococcaceae and Methylomonadaceae exploded in winter, suggesting that in this less productive lake, biological oxidation is the dominant brake on methane escape. In deep Negra Lake, by contrast, methanotrophs declined in winter, possibly because even full mixing could not deliver enough oxygen to the lake&#8217;s great depths, allowing methane to accumulate.</p>
<p>Trophic status emerged as a unifying theme. Negra and Funda are classified as being in poor and bad ecological status respectively under the EU Water Framework Directive, with chlorophyll-a values reaching 45 and 86.4 micrograms per liter, while Comprida remains in good status with far lower productivity. The eutrophic lakes support larger microbial communities engaged in anaerobic degradation, which translates into higher greenhouse gas production. The study&#8217;s total emission estimates reflect this: when the lakes were stratified, Funda released about 1.23 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per day, compared with 0.33 and 0.23 tonnes for Comprida and Negra. Methane emissions, ranging from 0.64 to 6.28 kilograms per day across the lakes, remained below global averages for lakes of comparable size, but the authors warn that ongoing eutrophication, potentially worsened by climate-driven increases in nutrient runoff, could push these numbers upward.</p>
<p>The broader message is that volcanic setting alone does not make a lake a carbon hotspot. In Flores&#8217;s maar lakes, the geology provides the basin, but the biology writes the emissions budget. Microbial communities act as dynamic regulators, mediating the balance between carbon fixation and respiration, between methanogenesis and methane oxidation, and shifting that balance with every seasonal turn of the water column. As climate change alters stratification patterns and nutrient loading in lakes worldwide, the authors argue that integrating microbial functional profiles into biogeochemical assessments will be essential for predicting how these small but numerous ecosystems will feed back on the global carbon cycle.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Carbon dioxide and methane fluxes and their microbial controls in monomictic volcanic crater lakes on Flores Island, Azores</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> CO2 and CH4 fluxes from monomictic volcanic lakes in a remote oceanic island: Flores island case study (Azores)</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Ferreira, L., Andrade, C., Cruz, J. V., Tassi, F., Pimentel, A., Braga, D., Frias, J., Raposeiro, P., &amp; Toubarro, D. (2026). CO2 and CH4 fluxes from monomictic volcanic lakes in a remote oceanic island: Flores island case study (Azores). <em>Environmental Earth Sciences, 85</em>(16), Article 417. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-026-13139-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-026-13139-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-026-13139-1" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s12665-026-13139-1</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> volcanic lakes, greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide flux, methane emissions, Azores, Flores Island, maar lakes, microbial communities, eutrophication, biogeochemistry, lake stratification, methanotrophs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">240946</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Algae-Dwelling Bacteria Act as Natural Filters Against Lake Methane Emissions</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/algae-dwelling-bacteria-act-as-natural-filters-against-lake-methane-emissions/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcus Vaughn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 23:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Athmospheric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African lake methane dynamics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[African lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Algae-dwelling bacteria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algae-rich water methane breakdown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogeochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biological methane mitigation mechanisms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congo Basin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environmental role of microalgae in methane reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eutrophication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freshwater emissions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of phytoplankton on greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lakes as greenhouse gas sources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large-scale lake methane studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane emissions from freshwater lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanotrophs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microalgae]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microalgae and bacteria interactions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial methane consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[natural methane filters in lakes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nature Communications.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phytoplankton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[University of Liège]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=220054</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A University of Liège study of 79 African lakes shows that methanotrophic bacteria living on microalgae consume more than 70 percent of dissolved methane, acting as natural filters that can outweigh increased methane production in eutrophic waters.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lakes have long been recognized as one of the planet&#8217;s most significant natural sources of methane, the second most potent greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide. In fact, the methane escaping from the world&#8217;s lakes each year is roughly equivalent to the emissions produced by the entire agricultural sector. Yet a new study from the University of Liège, published in Nature Communications, reveals that a remarkable biological mechanism operating at the microscopic scale may be doing far more to restrain these emissions than scientists had previously appreciated. Across 79 African lakes, bacteria living on the surfaces of microalgae have been shown to break down methane at rates that scale dramatically with the abundance of the algae themselves, effectively transforming polluted, algae-rich waters into sites of intense natural methane consumption.</p>
<p>The research, led by Alberto Borges, an oceanographer and head of the CO2 Lab at the University of Liège, represents the largest investigation of its kind ever conducted. The team carried out 503 individual measurements spanning lakes that range from oligotrophic systems with very low algal biomass and strikingly clear waters to hypereutrophic lakes whose waters are rendered green by dense blooms of phytoplankton, the community of microscopic algae suspended in the water column. This extraordinary gradient of lake types allowed the researchers to test, at continental scale, what actually controls the fate of methane once it is produced in lake sediments and diffuses upward through the water.</p>
<p>To understand why this finding matters, it helps to consider the underlying chemistry and microbiology of methane in freshwater systems. Methane emissions from a lake, as Borges explains, are the result of a balance between two opposing processes. On the production side, methanogenesis occurs in the oxygen-free sediments at the bottom of the lake, where archaeal microorganisms decompose organic matter and release methane as a metabolic byproduct. On the loss side, microbial oxidation takes place in the water column, where a specialized group of bacteria known as methanotrophs consume methane as their preferred substrate, using it both as a source of energy and as the raw material for building their own biomass. The net emission that reaches the atmosphere is simply what remains after this microbial consumption has had its effect.</p>
<p>The central discovery of the new study is that methane oxidation increases sharply with the amount of microalgae present in the water. The surfaces of these algae are colonized by communities of bacteria, and among them are methanotrophs that exist in a mutually beneficial relationship with their algal hosts. The methanotrophs supply the algae with carbon dioxide, which the algae use for photosynthesis, while the algae in turn produce the oxygen that the bacteria require to oxidize methane. This tight metabolic coupling means that the more abundant the microalgae become, the more abundant the methanotrophic bacteria become as well, and the more intense the oxidation of methane turns out to be. In the most productive lakes studied, oxidation rates reached levels tens of thousands of times higher than those measured in the poorest lakes.</p>
<p>The scale of this consumption is far from trivial. According to the study, oxidation is the main fate of methane dissolved in the surface waters of the lakes examined, eliminating more than 70 percent of it. That is substantially more methane than ultimately escapes into the atmosphere, which means that without this bacterial activity, lake emissions would be considerably higher than current estimates suggest. The finding reframes the way scientists think about the greenhouse gas budget of inland waters, because a process that was often treated as a secondary detail in methane cycling turns out to be the dominant control on how much methane actually reaches the air.</p>
<p>The study also uncovered a second, geographically distinct source of intense methane oxidation. Lakes bordered by the flooded forests of the Congo Basin were characterized by particularly high levels of oxidation, fueled by an influx of bacteria originating from the submerged forest soils. This suggests that the connection between terrestrial ecosystems and lake methane dynamics extends beyond the simple delivery of organic carbon. Flooded forests appear to seed adjacent waters with methanotrophic communities, adding another layer of biological control to the methane budget of these tropical systems and highlighting the importance of riparian and wetland vegetation in regulating greenhouse gas fluxes.</p>
<p>What makes the result especially consequential is how it interacts with the ongoing global problem of eutrophication, the enrichment of waters with nutrients that drives excessive algal growth. Earlier work by the same team had shown that as phytoplankton biomass increases, methane production in the sediments increases as well, because algal detritus sinking to the lake bottom serves as a rich feedstock for the methane-producing microorganisms living there. On its own, that relationship painted a worrying picture: the greener and more polluted a lake becomes, the more methane it should emit. The new study demonstrates that the reality is more nuanced, because two opposing effects occur simultaneously in eutrophic waters.</p>
<p>As pollution drives phytoplankton to proliferate, methane production in the sediments rises, but the methanotrophic bacteria attached to the algae multiply in parallel and consume an increasing share of that methane. Crucially, in the lakes studied, the increase in oxidation can outweigh the increase in production. In the absence of these algae-associated bacteria, methane emissions into the atmosphere would be much higher than what is actually observed. The bacteria therefore act, in Borges&#8217;s words, as natural and welcome filters that partially mitigate the effect of lake pollution on global warming. It is an important piece of the puzzle that was missing, and one that will allow researchers to better predict the future trajectory of methane emissions from lakes as eutrophication continues to spread across the tropics and beyond.</p>
<p>The implications extend well beyond African lakes. Tropical and subtropical freshwaters are among the most productive ecosystems on Earth, and many are experiencing accelerating nutrient loading from agriculture, urbanization, and wastewater discharge. If the coupling between phytoplankton and methanotrophs documented here proves to be a general feature of productive lakes, then global methane budgets for inland waters may need to be revised downward, and the models used to project future emissions will need to incorporate algal-bacterial symbiosis as a first-order control rather than a footnote. Conversely, any environmental change that disrupts this symbiosis, such as shifts in nutrient regimes, light availability, or water chemistry, could tip the balance back toward greater emissions.</p>
<p>For now, the study stands as a vivid reminder that the climate system is shaped not only by vast physical processes but also by intimate partnerships between microscopic organisms. On the surface of a single algal cell drifting in a green African lake, a bacterium consumes methane and exhales carbon dioxide that the alga immediately recycles into oxygen and organic matter. Multiplied across hundreds of lakes and billions of microbial encounters, this quiet exchange removes the majority of the methane that would otherwise warm the planet. Understanding and protecting such natural filters may prove to be an essential part of anticipating how freshwater ecosystems will respond to a changing, increasingly nutrient-rich world.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Methane oxidation by algae-associated methanotrophic bacteria in African lakes</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> In African lakes, microbes living on algae reduce a powerful greenhouse gas</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> In African lakes, microbes living on algae reduce a powerful greenhouse gas. (n.d.). <a href="https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1145908" rel="noopener noreferrer">Original publication</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> Not provided</p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> methane, methanotrophs, microalgae, African lakes, eutrophication, greenhouse gases, phytoplankton, Nature Communications, University of Liège, Congo Basin, biogeochemistry, freshwater emissions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">220054</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rainforest Soils Flip From Methane Sponge to Source as Seasons Change</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/rainforest-soils-flip-from-methane-sponge-to-source-as-seasons-change/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Violet Maxwell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 16:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Earth Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogeochemistry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biogeochemistry of rainforest soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[greenhouse gases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane as a greenhouse gas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane cycling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane destruction and production]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane flux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methane fluxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanogenesis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[methanotrophs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microbial communities in soil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oxygen availability in soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rainforest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rainforest soils]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal changes in soil methane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasonal variation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil moisture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil moisture gradient effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soil sink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subtropical Australian rainforests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subtropical forest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tree stems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[waterlogged soils]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=196103</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New field measurements in a subtropical Australian rainforest show that soil methane fluxes can swing from a sink to a strong source with seasonal wetting, while tree stem emissions amplify methane release only in the wettest terrain.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the humid subtropical rainforests of eastern Australia, a quiet drama of planetary proportions plays out in the soil beneath the roots of ancient trees. Methane, a greenhouse gas roughly thirty times more potent than carbon dioxide over a century, is simultaneously being destroyed and manufactured in the dark, waterlogged pores of forest soils. A new study published in the journal Biogeochemistry has now tracked this push-and-pull across an entire seasonal cycle, revealing just how dramatically the balance can tip when the rains arrive.</p>
<p>Researchers from Southern Cross University, together with a colleague from NASA&#8217;s Goddard Space Flight Center and the University of Maryland, carried out four field campaigns in a subtropical Australian rainforest, measuring methane fluxes from both tree stems and forest soils. Their study plots were deliberately positioned along a moisture gradient: a valley floor plot where water lingers, a lower slope plot, and an upper slope plot where the ground drains freely. This design allowed the team to isolate one of the most important controls on methane cycling in any landscape, the availability of oxygen in the soil.</p>
<p>The underlying science is a contest between two microbial communities. In aerated soils, methanotrophic bacteria consume methane from the atmosphere, oxidizing it for energy and acting as a biological filter that removes this potent greenhouse gas before it can accumulate. But when soils become saturated, oxygen disappears, and a different group of microbes, the methanogenic archaea, takes over, producing methane as a byproduct of anaerobic decomposition. Whether a forest soil is a net sink or a net source of methane depends on which of these processes dominates, and that, in turn, depends heavily on soil moisture.</p>
<p>The study&#8217;s findings show that this dominance can flip with the seasons. On the valley floor, the researchers documented a remarkable transition: at the end of the dry season, the soil absorbed methane at a rate of about 151 micromoles per square meter per day, acting as a modest sink. But by the end of the wet season, the same soil had transformed into a powerful methane source, emitting around 830 micromoles per square meter per day. That is a swing of nearly a thousand micromoles per square meter per day driven almost entirely by changing water conditions, a magnitude of seasonal variability that underscores how misleading single-visit field measurements can be when estimating a landscape&#8217;s true greenhouse gas budget.</p>
<p>The sloped plots told a steadier story. On the lower slope, soils absorbed methane at an average rate of 135 micromoles per square meter per day, while the upper slope soils absorbed slightly more, at 156 micromoles per square meter per day. Crucially, these drier positions maintained their methane-consuming function throughout the year, remaining reliable sinks regardless of season. Because upland forests cover vast areas of the planet, this finding reinforces the significance of well-drained forest soils as one of the biological world&#8217;s most important natural defenses against methane accumulation in the atmosphere.</p>
<p>But the soil was only half the investigation. In recent years, scientists have increasingly recognized that trees themselves can act as conduits for methane, drawing dissolved gas up from waterlogged soils through their vascular systems and venting it from their stems, or hosting methane-producing microbes within their own tissues. Whether these stem emissions are significant enough to undermine the methane-removal service provided by upland forest soils has remained one of the field&#8217;s most pressing open questions.</p>
<p>Across most of the study site, the answer was reassuring. In the sloped plots, tree stems emitted negligible amounts of methane, and their tiny emissions offset less than one percent of the methane being consumed by the surrounding soils. In other words, the upland rainforest kept its carbon credentials intact: soils continued to scrub methane from the atmosphere, and the trees did little to undo that work. This is an important benchmark for global models, which must decide how much attention to give tree stem fluxes in dry upland settings, and it suggests that in such environments the soil sink comfortably dominates.</p>
<p>The valley floor was another matter. At the end of the wet season, when the saturated soil was already releasing methane in earnest, the trees added substantially to the problem. Stem emissions there contributed an extra 27 percent on top of the soil source, effectively amplifying an already large methane flux. The mechanism is intuitive: when soil air spaces fill with water, methane produced below ground can escape upward more readily through the aerenchyma and transport tissues of trees than through the waterlogged soil itself, making trees the path of least resistance for gas trying to reach the atmosphere.</p>
<p>Among the more striking discoveries were two individual trees that the researchers describe as high emitters. These outliers vented methane at rates two hundred and three hundred times higher than neighboring trees of comparable size on the same plots. Such extreme individual variability has been noted in other forest systems, but documenting it in a subtropical rainforest highlights a persistent challenge for field scientists and modelers alike: a small number of anomalous trees can disproportionately influence plot-level emissions estimates, particularly if they cluster in wetter microsites. Understanding what makes certain trees such efficient methane conduits, whether it is their rooting depth, stem anatomy, associated microbial communities, or proximity to methane-rich soil layers, is now a priority for follow-up work.</p>
<p>Statistically, the study found that both tree stem and soil methane fluxes correlated significantly and positively with soil moisture, confirming the moisture gradient as the master variable governing methane exchange in this ecosystem. This relationship has implications well beyond one Australian forest. As climate change alters rainfall patterns, intensifying both droughts and deluges in many subtropical regions, the moisture status of forest soils will shift accordingly, and with it the delicate balance between methane consumption and production. Periods of unusual wetness could temporarily convert upland landscapes that normally function as methane sinks into net emitters, while prolonged drying could expand the spatial footprint of the sink.</p>
<p>The research also carries lessons for how greenhouse gas inventories should be constructed. Because the valley floor transitioned between sink and source within a single year, any sampling campaign that visits a site only once, in either the wet or the dry season, risks capturing a snapshot that badly misrepresents the annual picture. The authors emphasize the high spatial and temporal heterogeneity of tree and soil methane fluxes in upland forests, a heterogeneity that demands repeated, seasonally distributed measurements across topographic gradients if regional and global methane budgets are to be trustworthy.</p>
<p>For the broader public, the takeaway is both sobering and hopeful. Sobering, because even pristine rainforests are not immune to climate feedbacks: wetter soils and methane-venting trees can tip natural ecosystems into contributing to the very problem they help mitigate. Hopeful, because the study confirms that the drier, extensive portions of subtropical rainforest landscapes remain steadfast methane sinks year-round, quietly removing a powerful greenhouse gas from the air at rates that matter globally. Protecting these forests, and the complex moisture gradients within them, preserves not only biodiversity and carbon storage but also this often-overlooked methane-scrubbing service.</p>
<p>The work, conducted with support from the Australian Research Council, the Hermon Slade Foundation, and other funders, adds a valuable subtropical data point to a global dataset still dominated by temperate and boreal measurements. As the search intensifies for natural systems that help regulate atmospheric methane, this study makes clear that the answer lies in the ground as much as in the canopy, and that the ground&#8217;s verdict changes with the weather.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Seasonal methane fluxes from tree stems and soils along a soil moisture gradient in a subtropical Australian rainforest</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Seasonal changes in tree stem and soil methane fluxes along a soil moisture gradient in a subtropical Australian rainforest</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Dittmann, J., Maher, D. T., Johnston, S. G., Das, A., Padilla-Montalvo, J. A., Stovall, A. E. L., &amp; Jeffrey, L. C. (2026). Seasonal changes in tree stem and soil methane fluxes along a soil moisture gradient in a subtropical Australian rainforest. <em>Biogeochemistry</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-026-01371-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-026-01371-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-026-01371-7" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s10533-026-01371-7</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> methane flux, rainforest, soil moisture, tree stems, greenhouse gases, methanotrophs, methanogenesis, soil sink, biogeochemistry, subtropical forest, seasonal variation, climate change</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">196103</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
