<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>metalloproteinases &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/metalloproteinases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 16:02:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>How Infection Signals Push Kidney Filter Cells Into Leaks, Damage, and Cell Death</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/how-infection-signals-push-kidney-filter-cells-into-leaks-damage-and-cell-death/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristina Jarvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 16:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apoptosis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[effects of sustained immune activation on kidney cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Erk MAP kinase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glomerular filtration barrier disruption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immune response in kidney filtration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact of podocyte injury on kidney function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kidney cell signaling in infection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kidney filtration barrier]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kidney infection-induced podocyte damage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lipopolysaccharide]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metalloproteinases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nephrin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nephrin shedding in kidney injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NFκB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podocyte apoptosis and cell death pathways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podocyte barrier leakiness and albumin leakage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podocyte foot process effacement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podocytes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proteinuria]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reactive oxygen species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slit diaphragm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TLR4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toll-like receptor 4 role in kidney cells]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transient proteinuria mechanisms]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=313569</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[New research shows that sustained activation of the innate immune receptor TLR4 in podocytes triggers a reversible leak in the kidney filtration barrier, shedding of nephrin, and eventually apoptotic cell death through distinct signaling pathways.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kidney specialists have long known that a minor infection can send protein spilling into the urine, a phenomenon called transient proteinuria that usually vanishes without a trace. A new study published in Physiological Reports now offers a detailed mechanistic explanation for how that temporary leak might begin at the level of a single cell. Working with cultured mouse podocytes, researchers showed that switching on a single innate immune receptor, Toll-like receptor 4, sets off three distinct cellular consequences that unfold on strikingly different timetables: a rapid and fully reversible increase in the leakiness of the podocyte barrier to albumin, a slower shedding of the key junctional protein nephrin, and, with sustained stimulation, apoptotic cell death.</p>
<p>Podocytes are the elegant, foot-shaped cells that wrap around the kidney&#8217;s glomerular capillaries. Their interlocking foot processes are joined by specialized junctions called slit diaphragms, which form the final and most size-selective layer of the blood filtration barrier. When podocytes are stressed, these foot processes retract and broaden in a change known as effacement, initially a protective adaptation that keeps the cells anchored to the glomerular basement membrane. That matters because the body has only a limited capacity to regenerate podocytes once they are lost. Understanding what triggers reversible effacement, as opposed to permanent damage, has been a central question in nephrology.</p>
<p>The new work focuses on TLR4, a pattern-recognition receptor long known to sit on the podocyte surface. TLR4 is the canonical sensor of lipopolysaccharide, the endotoxin shed from the outer membranes of gram-negative bacteria. Injecting LPS into mice is a standard model of sepsis, and it reliably produces proteinuria and foot process effacement within 24 hours, with the glomerular changes fully reversible after a single dose. That reversibility has fueled the provocative hypothesis that proteinuria may, in some circumstances, be a purposeful response, accelerating the clearance of potentially toxic substances from the circulation.</p>
<p>Studying TLR4 in living animals is notoriously messy. The receptor is abundant on monocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, and epithelia, and its activation floods the bloodstream with inflammatory cytokines that alter hemodynamics across the whole organism. To isolate the podocyte&#8217;s own contribution, the team turned to immortalized MPC-5 mouse podocytes, differentiated into a mature phenotype that robustly expresses nephrin and podocin. The cells were grown as confluent monolayers on transwell inserts, where they form nephrin-dependent barriers whose selectivity closely mirrors the living glomerular filter. This reductionist design ensured that every response observed was initiated by TLR4 receptors on podocytes themselves, with no other cell type present.</p>
<p>To activate the receptor cleanly, the researchers used CRX527, a synthetic aminoalkyl glucosaminide 4-phosphate that structurally mimics lipid A, the toxic core of LPS, and acts as a highly selective TLR4 agonist. Its effects were confirmed as TLR4-specific because they were completely abolished by TAK242, a structurally unrelated antagonist that binds only TLR4. At a concentration of 0.7 micromolar, within the middle of the known dose-response range, CRX527 exposures of just one hour significantly increased the flux of fluorescently labeled albumin across the podocyte monolayer. Remarkably, after a 72-hour recovery period in normal media, that permeability increase disappeared entirely, demonstrating that the acute leak is fully reversible.</p>
<p>The researchers then traced which intracellular messages carried that rapid signal. A brief exposure to CRX527 provoked a fast burst of Erk MAP kinase activation, detectable as phosphorylation of Erk1/2 within 30 minutes, followed by a rise in cytosolic reactive oxygen species that persisted through 24 hours of agonist exposure. Pharmacological dissection showed that the one-hour permeability increase was blunted by TEMPOL, a membrane-permeable ROS quencher, and by PD98059, a MEK1 inhibitor that blocks the Erk pathway. In contrast, the permeability effect persisted when NFκB signaling was blocked with JSH-23, consistent with the observation that one hour of agonist exposure is simply not enough to activate the transcription factor at all.</p>
<p>A second response required longer stimulation. After 24 hours of continuous CRX527 exposure, the culture medium accumulated markedly elevated levels of soluble nephrin, measured by ELISA, indicating that the ectodomains of this slit diaphragm protein had been proteolytically cleaved from the cell surface. The shedding was blocked by the broad-spectrum metalloproteinase inhibitor Batimastat, implicating matrix metalloproteinases or related sheddase enzymes in the ADAM family. Critically, one hour of exposure, enough to open the permeability barrier, produced no shedding at all, and the shedding response required Erk activation but, unlike the permeability change, did not depend on ROS and persisted despite NFκB blockade. It also required ongoing protein synthesis, being abolished by cycloheximide.</p>
<p>Importantly, the shedding was not a byproduct of cells dying or detaching. Immunoblot analysis showed that total cellular abundance of nephrin, podocin, and synaptopodin, the core structural proteins of foot processes, was unchanged after 24 hours of CRX527 treatment, which would not be expected if cells had sloughed off the substrate. The team also ruled out TRPC6 calcium channels as essential mediators, since nephrin shedding continued in the presence of SAR7334, a selective TRPC6 inhibitor, even though sustained TRPC6 activation is known to produce similar shedding. One intriguing casualty of prolonged stimulation was WT-1, a transcription factor that maintains the mature podocyte phenotype, which declined significantly after 24 hours, hinting at early dedifferentiation.</p>
<p>The darkest consequence emerged only with the most sustained activation. Seventy-two hours of continuous CRX527 exposure drove a marked increase in cleaved caspase-3, the executioner enzyme of apoptosis, confirmed independently by Annexin V measurement. This cell death program was blocked by TAK242, and pharmacological mapping showed it required both ROS generation and NFκB activation, while remaining insensitive to Erk inhibition. Twenty-four hours, by contrast, was not sufficient to cleave caspase-3. The researchers also connected the pathway through MyD88, the canonical adapter linking TLR4 to downstream transducers, since siRNA knockdown of MyD88 suppressed NFκB activation.</p>
<p>The overall picture is one of a single receptor encoding time: minutes of TLR4 activity transiently loosen the filtration barrier through ROS and Erk, a day of activity strips nephrin from the junction through metalloprotease-dependent shedding, and days of unremitting signaling kill the cell through a ROS- and NFκB-dependent apoptotic route. The findings support the idea that at least part of the proteinuria seen after endotoxin exposure in animals stems from direct podocyte effects rather than systemic inflammation. They also provide a plausible mechanism for benign transient proteinuria after minor infections, fever, or intense exercise, and echo known parallels with angiotensin II signaling, which similarly recruits Erk to promote nephrin internalization and loosens the filter. The authors caution that the work is entirely in vitro and that agonist concentrations may exceed those generated physiologically, but the model now stands as a testable framework for a common and usually harmless clinical phenomenon.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> TLR4 signaling pathways that drive albumin permeability, nephrin shedding, and apoptosis in cultured podocytes</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> TLR4 signaling cascades leading to increases in albumin permeability, nephrin ectodomain shedding, and apoptosis in MPC‐5 podocytes</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Kim, E. Y., &amp; Dryer, S. E. (2026). TLR4 signaling cascades leading to increases in albumin permeability, nephrin ectodomain shedding, and apoptosis in MPC ‐5 podocytes. <em>Physiological Reports, 14</em>(20), Article e71147. <a href="https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.71147" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.71147</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.71147" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.14814/phy2.71147</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> TLR4, podocytes, nephrin, proteinuria, kidney filtration barrier, lipopolysaccharide, reactive oxygen species, NFκB, Erk MAP kinase, apoptosis, slit diaphragm, metalloproteinases</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">313569</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antivenom Cross-Reactivity Revealed Across Five Deadly Iranian Viper Venoms</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/antivenom-cross-reactivity-revealed-across-five-deadly-iranian-viper-venoms/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drew Townsend]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 22:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivenom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antivenom design for Iranian vipers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ELISA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geographic variation in snake venom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gloydius caucasicus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iranian viper venom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iranian vipers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LD50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metalloproteinases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neutralization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phospholipase A2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyvalent antivenom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyvalent snakebite antivenom effectiveness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regional snakebite treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snakebite]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snakebite antivenom cross-reactivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snakebite public health challenges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systemic snakebite envenoming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venom composition variability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venom cross-reactivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venom neutralization studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venom recognition and cross-protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[venomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viper species in Iran]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=199124</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study maps toxicity, venom composition, and antivenom cross-reactivity across five medically important Iranian vipers, revealing both promising cross-neutralisation and critical gaps.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snakebite envenomation remains one of the world&#8217;s most neglected public health crises, with the World Health Organization estimating that roughly 5.4 million people are bitten each year, producing between 1.8 and 2.7 million cases of envenoming and up to 137,000 deaths. Antivenom, produced by hyperimmunising large mammals such as horses or sheep with snake venom, is the only specific treatment for systemic envenoming, yet its effectiveness is constrained by enormous geographic and biological variability in venom composition. A new study from the Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute in Iran has now mapped, in unusual detail, how well experimental antivenoms recognise and neutralise the venoms of five medically important Iranian vipers, offering a data-driven blueprint for designing better regional therapies.</p>
<p>The research, published in Veterinary Medicine and Science, focused on five viperid species responsible for a large share of clinically significant snakebites in Iran: Montivipera raddei, Macrovipera lebetina, Echis carinatus, Pseudocerastes persicus, and Gloydius caucasicus. Because victims rarely identify the species that bit them, clinicians typically rely on polyvalent antivenoms raised against panels of local snakes. Whether such broad-spectrum products actually work, however, depends on how much antigenic overlap exists between the venoms of different species, a question the Iranian team set out to answer with a combination of biochemical profiling, immunological assays, and gold-standard in vivo neutralisation tests.</p>
<p>The first step was to quantify how lethal each venom is. In a murine model, the researchers determined median lethal dose values by intravenous injection and probit regression, and the spread was striking. Gloydius caucasicus proved the most toxic, with an LD50 of 0.22 micrograms per gram of body weight, followed closely by Macrovipera lebetina at 0.27, Montivipera raddei at 0.30, and Echis carinatus at 0.56. Pseudocerastes persicus was considerably less potent at 0.87 micrograms per gram. These figures align with earlier reports that Gloydius venom is among the most dangerous in Iran, while also underscoring how toxicity can shift with geography, snake age, diet, and even the route of administration used in testing.</p>
<p>To understand the molecular basis of these differences, the team separated venom proteins by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis under both reducing and non-reducing conditions. All five venoms shared prominent bands at roughly 22, 50, and 130 to 150 kilodaltons, although band intensities varied by species. The approximately 22-kilodalton band, which intensified and shifted to around 14 to 15 kilodaltons after disulphide bonds were broken, is consistent with secreted phospholipase A2 enzymes, small cysteine-rich toxins that drive multiple pharmacological effects in viper envenoming. The 50-kilodalton band, strongest in Pseudocerastes persicus, likely corresponds to snake venom metalloproteinases, the haemorrhage-causing enzymes classified into P-I, P-II, and P-III subclasses. The high-molecular-weight 130 to 150 kilodalton band, which fragmented upon reduction, plausibly represents L-amino acid oxidase homodimers, whose subunits typically run at 55 to 70 kilodaltons.</p>
<p>Reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography added a second layer of resolution, generating species-specific chromatographic fingerprints. Gloydius caucasicus showed a dominant mid-range cluster of peaks accounting for nearly 65 percent of detected area, with a single component representing over 30 percent. Echis carinatus displayed the broadest complexity, with seven significant peaks and a mid-range cluster covering 65.6 percent of the area, consistent with proteotranscriptomic studies showing that Echis venoms are richly diverse mixtures of metalloproteinases, serine proteases, C-type lectin-like proteins, and phospholipases A2. Montivipera raddei produced a comparatively simple profile dominated by one late-eluting component, while Macrovipera lebetina resolved into eight main peaks. Pseudocerastes persicus stood apart with a distinctive early-eluting fraction absent from all other venoms, a feature attributed to abundant phospholipases A2, L-amino acid oxidases, and unique peptide components reported in prior proteomic work.</p>
<p>With the venoms characterised, the researchers immunised New Zealand White rabbits, dividing them into monovalent groups receiving single venoms and a polyvalent group receiving an equal-volume mixture of all five. Indirect ELISA then measured how each antivenom bound homologous and heterologous venoms. The results revealed a remarkable spectrum of cross-reactivity. Antivenom raised against Montivipera raddei was the broadest recognizer, binding Pseudocerastes persicus at 92 percent, Echis carinatus at 91 percent, Macrovipera lebetina at 95 percent, and Gloydius caucasicus at 80 percent of homologous levels. Pseudocerastes persicus antivenom also cross-reacted strongly with most relatives, but only weakly with Gloydius caucasicus at 44 percent. At the other extreme, Gloydius caucasicus antivenom showed the lowest heterologous binding of all, while the polyvalent preparation bound every venom at 95 percent or higher, confirming that combining five immunogens did not compromise the antibody response.</p>
<p>Crucially, binding did not always predict neutralisation, a well-known limitation of ELISA, which cannot distinguish neutralising antibodies from those that merely recognise epitopes. In vivo assays challenging mice with five lethal doses of venom pre-incubated with antivenom told a more nuanced story. Each monovalent antivenom was most potent against its own venom, as expected, but meaningful cross-neutralisation emerged in several pairings. Macrovipera lebetina and Montivipera raddei antivenoms neutralised Pseudocerastes persicus venom at 1.17 and 1.07 milligrams of venom per millilitre of antivenom respectively, while Pseudocerastes antivenom neutralised Montivipera raddei at 0.49 and Echis carinatus at 0.66 milligrams per millilitre. Gloydius caucasicus antivenom, in sharp contrast, neutralised only its homologous venom and showed little or no activity against any heterologous venom tested. The polyvalent formulation neutralised all five venoms, performing best against Pseudocerastes persicus and Echis carinatus and weakest against Gloydius caucasicus.</p>
<p>The authors interpret these patterns through the lens of shared and divergent toxin families. Broad cross-reactivity among Montivipera, Macrovipera, and Pseudocerastes likely reflects conserved metalloproteinases and phospholipases A2, the dominant immunogens of Old World viper venoms. The poor performance of Gloydius caucasicus antivenom mirrors findings from other Gloydius species, whose distinct venom compositions, possibly including unique haemorrhagic metalloproteinases, demand species-specific antibodies. Comparable studies elsewhere reinforce the picture: Thai monovalent antivenoms show variable cross-neutralisation across Asian vipers, Pakistani Viper Antivenom cross-neutralises saw-scaled and Russell&#8217;s viper subspecies across the Indian subcontinent, and the polyvalent Inoserp Europe covers several Vipera, Montivipera, and Macrovipera species, consistent with conserved toxin architecture within the subfamily Viperinae.</p>
<p>The practical implications are direct. Venoms that generate both strong cross-reactivity and cross-neutralisation, such as those of Montivipera raddei and Macrovipera lebetina, are strong candidates for inclusion in immunisation mixtures aimed at paraspecific protection. Venoms with narrow cross-neutralisation, above all Gloydius caucasicus, must be explicitly represented in any formulation intended to cover the full Iranian viper spectrum. The findings also echo clinical experience: a study of 44 viper-envenomed patients treated with Iranian polyvalent antivenom documented reduced envenoming severity and normalised coagulation parameters within 12 hours, supporting the therapeutic value of polyspecific products when species identification is uncertain.</p>
<p>The researchers caution that their SDS-PAGE and RP-HPLC data are comparative fingerprints rather than definitive proteomic assignments, and that converting chromatographic peaks into precise toxin identities requires LC-MS/MS-based venomics and antivenomics. They also note that immunological profiles depend heavily on the host animal used for antibody production, so results from rabbits cannot be extrapolated directly to horse-derived commercial antivenoms. Even so, by integrating lethality, protein profiling, binding, and neutralisation into a single comparative framework, the study delivers exactly the kind of evidence base needed to rationally reformulate antivenoms for a region where five vipers, each with its own toxic signature, share the same landscapes and the same emergency rooms.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Immunological cross-reactivity and neutralizing efficacy of antivenom against five medically important Iranian viper venoms</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Immunological Cross‐Reactivity and Neutralizing Efficacy of Antivenom Against Five Medically Important Iranian Viper Venoms</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Khamehchian, S., Tahoori, F., Rabie, H., Nasrabadi, N. N., &amp; Tebianian, M. (2026). Immunological Cross‐Reactivity and Neutralizing Efficacy of Antivenom Against Five Medically Important Iranian Viper Venoms. <em>Veterinary Medicine and Science, 12</em>(5), Article e71193. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.71193" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.71193</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.71193" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1002/vms3.71193</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> snakebite, antivenom, Iranian vipers, venom cross-reactivity, neutralization, venomics, ELISA, LD50, phospholipase A2, metalloproteinases, polyvalent antivenom, Gloydius caucasicus</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">199124</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
