The necessity for understanding how older adults cope with chronic illnesses is underscored by the growing number of individuals aged 65 and older who suffer from multiple chronic conditions. Research indicates that this demographic often experiences higher levels of stress, anxiety, and depression—factors that can exacerbate their physical conditions and diminish overall well-being. Ma et al.’s study, conducted across multiple centers, presents a complex analysis of various coping modes, revealing patterns that differ significantly across individual patients.

Coping strategies can take various forms, including problem-focused, emotion-focused, and avoidant strategies. The study by Ma et al. categorizes these approaches into distinct profiles, allowing researchers to understand how various coping mechanisms fit within the broader context of chronic illness management. Utilizing advanced statistical methods such as latent profile analysis, the researchers identified distinct groups of patients with unique coping capacities. This innovative approach not only enables a nuanced understanding of coping strategies but also highlights the importance of tailoring interventions to the specific needs of different patient profiles.

Through the lens of a multi-center study, the researchers were able to gather a diverse pool of participants, reflecting various sociocultural backgrounds and health statuses among rural older adults. This diversity is critical as it allows for a richer interpretation of how environmental factors and access to healthcare influence coping strategies. The findings revealed that those with a stronger support network tended to employ more adaptive coping mechanisms, suggesting that social support plays a foundational role in mental resilience.

Furthermore, the analysis unveiled the significant role of demographic factors such as gender, socioeconomic status, and education level. For instance, it was noted that women were disproportionately represented in some maladaptive coping profiles, which raises pertinent questions about gender disparities in mental health among the elderly. These insights compel researchers and practitioners to consider the intersectionality of various factors influencing older adults’ coping mechanisms.

In addition to demographic considerations, the study emphasizes the role that chronic conditions play in shaping psychological responses. The complexity of co-morbidities means that patients are not simply dealing with one ailment; instead, they manage a web of symptoms and health challenges. The researchers highlighted that this complexity can lead to overwhelming stress, which in turn impacts the effectiveness of coping strategies employed. Understanding the intricacies of this relationship can lead to better-targeted therapies and support systems for older patients.

One of the salient findings of the research is the identification of common barriers that prevent older adults from adopting more effective coping strategies. Many participants reported feelings of isolation, lack of access to mental health resources, and inadequate knowledge about their conditions. Addressing these barriers is crucial for improving mental health outcomes and facilitating better management of chronic conditions. Innovative solutions, including telehealth services and community-based support groups, may alleviate some of these issues by providing resources and encouragement to older adults.

In addition, the implications of this study extend far beyond the individual patient level. Policymakers and healthcare providers should take notice of the necessity of integrating mental health services within chronic illness care frameworks. By fostering environments where psychological support is readily available, healthcare systems can promote the overall well-being of older patients. This integration could involve training healthcare providers to recognize signs of emotional distress and implement routine screenings for mental health issues in chronic care settings.

Furthermore, the study inspires further research into the development of intervention programs tailored to specific coping profiles identified in the study. By employing an individualized approach, practitioners can enhance the efficacy of interventions, ensuring that they are relevant and accessible to diverse populations. Future studies could test the effectiveness of targeted cognitive-behavioral therapies or mindfulness programs aimed at improving coping strategies among different patient profiles.

In conclusion, Ma et al.’s study presents invaluable insights into the coping mechanisms of rural older patients grappling with chronic co-morbidities. By illuminating the intricate relationship between chronic illness and mental health, the study serves as a call to action for both researchers and healthcare practitioners. Addressing the unique needs of older adults through tailored coping strategies and support services can significantly enhance their quality of life.

Subject of Research: Coping strategies of rural older patients with chronic co-morbidities.

Article Title: Latent profiles of coping modes in rural older patients with chronic co-morbidities: a multi-center study.

Article References: Ma, H., Li, Z., Zhuo, Y. et al. Latent profiles of coping modes in rural older patients with chronic co-morbidities: a multi-center study. BMC Geriatr (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06879-5

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI:

Keywords: Chronic co-morbidities, coping strategies, older adults, mental health, rural health, healthcare integration, intervention programs, latent profile analysis.

China’s demographic structure has undergone dramatic transformation over the past few decades, marked by a soaring proportion of elderly citizens due to increased life expectancy and declining birth rates. This demographic shift brings a surge in age-related health concerns, including mental health disorders such as depression, which often go underreported or inadequately addressed in elderly populations. Depression among the elderly is associated with diminished quality of life, increased healthcare utilization, and higher mortality, making it a pressing issue for health policy.

Yang and Shu’s study leverages the 2020 wave of CHARLS, a nationally representative longitudinal survey that captures a comprehensive portrait of middle-aged and older adults across China. The CHARLS data set includes detailed demographic information, health status indicators, and socioeconomic variables, along with data on welfare program participation. By focusing on this cohort, the researchers were able to conduct an extensive examination of correlations between elderly welfare programs and depressive symptoms.

One of the key aspects of the study involves the methodical assessment of depressive symptoms using standardized psychological instruments embedded within CHARLS. The CES-D (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale) or similar scales offer validated measures of depressive symptom severity, enabling an accurate and reliable quantification of mental health status. This approach allows the research team to compare depressive symptom prevalence across elderly individuals with differing levels and types of welfare program participation.

The findings reveal a compelling association between participation in elderly welfare programs and a reduction in reported depressive symptoms. Welfare programs in China, which may include pension schemes, social security benefits, community services, and healthcare subsidies, appear to provide both financial and psychosocial support, mitigating stressors that contribute to depression. This protective effect is especially pronounced among economically disadvantaged and socially isolated elderly populations, underscoring the importance of well-targeted welfare policies.

Moreover, the study highlights heterogeneity in impact depending on the type and scope of welfare programs, suggesting that multidimensional interventions addressing financial security, social connectivity, and access to healthcare yield the most substantial mental health benefits. Such findings emphasize that policies aimed at elderly welfare should adopt a holistic framework rather than singular focus on income support.

The cross-sectional nature of the research imposes certain limitations on causal interpretations; however, the statistical rigor employed—including multivariable regression models controlling for confounders such as age, gender, health status, and urban-rural residence—strengthens the credibility of the associations identified. The researchers also call for longitudinal analyses in future research to better ascertain the temporal dynamics and causality.

Another important contribution of Yang and Shu’s work lies in the cultural context it elucidates. Chinese elderly often experience unique social dynamics stemming from traditional family structures, rapid urbanization, and shifting societal values. Welfare programs that integrate community engagement and respect cultural norms may hence be more effective in alleviating depressive symptoms, an insight with implications extending beyond China’s borders.

In a broader context, the study contributes to the global discourse on aging and mental health by providing empirical evidence from a middle-income country with a massive elderly population. As many nations grapple with similar demographic trends, the findings offer valuable lessons on how government-led welfare initiatives can serve as potent tools to combat mental health challenges among the aging populace.

The urgency of addressing elderly depression is underscored by the projected increase in healthcare burden associated with untreated mental disorders. Depression not only exacerbates physical comorbidities but also leads to significant functional impairment, imposing consequences on families and communities. Therefore, elucidating pathways to mitigate this burden through social programs is a critical public health priority.

In addition to policy implications, the research elevates the need for integrated healthcare models encompassing psychological screening, social support facilitation, and welfare program accessibility. This multidisciplinary approach is likely to enhance early identification and comprehensive management of depression in later life stages.

Perhaps most striking is the potential for scalable replication of successful welfare initiatives identified in this study across other developing and developed nations. Innovations in elderly welfare provision, informed by local needs and evidence such as that provided by Yang and Shu, can revolutionize how societies care for their aging members.

To translate these findings into practice, collaboration among government agencies, healthcare providers, and community organizations is imperative. Enhancing outreach, reducing stigma around mental health, and ensuring that elderly welfare programs are inclusive and accessible will be paramount to maximizing their benefit.

In conclusion, the study by Yang and Shu shines a spotlight on the intersection of elderly welfare and mental health, illuminating pathways to improve the well-being of millions of older adults in China and potentially worldwide. As aging populations rise globally, such evidence-based approaches will be foundational to fostering not only longer lives but also healthier and happier ones.

Subject of Research:
Elderly welfare programs and their association with depressive symptoms among elderly populations in China.

Article Title:
Elderly welfare programs and depressive symptoms in China: cross-sectional evidence from CHARLS 2020.

Article References:
Yang, H., Shu, Z. Elderly welfare programs and depressive symptoms in China: cross-sectional evidence from CHARLS 2020. BMC Psychol (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03811-9

Image Credits: AI Generated

Cancer is not merely a physical illness; it is also a profound emotional experience that can lead to significant feelings of anxiety and depression. Geriatric patients, who often have coexisting health conditions and diminished social networks, are particularly susceptible to these psychological challenges. The study conducted by Jamshidi and colleagues highlights how essential social support can be in mitigating these mental health issues. It is well-documented that having a robust support system—encompassing family, friends, and community resources—can enhance a patient’s ability to cope with the demands of their illness.

The researchers employed a comprehensive methodology that included quantitative measures of both social support and mental health indicators. They utilized validated scales to assess the levels of perceived social support among participants and correlated these to measures of anxiety and depression experienced during hospital stays. Notably, their results indicate that higher levels of perceived social support are significantly associated with lower levels of anxiety and depression in these patients. This finding emphasizes the importance of fostering social connections, as they can be a crucial buffer against the psychological impact of cancer treatment.

Qualifying the quality of life in these patients further emphasizes the multifaceted nature of their health. The study suggests that those who received adequate social support reported a better quality of life, suggesting the direct implications of social interactions on holistic health outcomes. Quality of life in geriatric cancer patients is not solely determined by clinical factors but is profoundly impacted by psychosocial dimensions. This pushes the discourse toward integrating mental health and social support into routine care practices for cancer patients, especially the elderly.

The implications of this research reach far beyond the confines of academic literature. In practical terms, healthcare providers, caregivers, and healthcare systems must recognize and address the psychosocial needs of elderly cancer patients. Interventions that encourage social engagement and the development of supportive networks could serve as effective strategies to improve not only mental health but also overall patient outcomes. The healthcare community might benefit from crafting programs that enhance social connectivity among patients undergoing treatment.

It is important to note the ongoing challenges in the healthcare system as it relates to supporting geriatric patients. With the increasing number of older adults facing cancer diagnoses, the strain on healthcare resources is escalating. Therefore, continuous advocacy for adequately funded support services is crucial. Policy reforms that prioritize mental health alongside physical health in cancer care can promote a more integrated approach to treatment. As the study highlights, understanding the psychosocial landscape faced by patients can transform how care is delivered.

Moreover, this research contributes to a growing body of literature that underscores the necessity of a supportive ecosystem for patients. The authors call for further work in this domain, particularly in understanding how different forms of support—emotional, informational, and practical—affect outcomes in cancer treatment broadly. Investigating these elements will provide deeper insights into effective intervention strategies that can be tailored to individual patient needs.

While this particular study focuses on geriatric cancer patients, its findings may well resonate with other populations facing chronic illnesses. The methodology and conclusions can serve as a blueprint for future studies examining the role of social support in various health contexts. Understanding these relationships extends beyond cancer treatment, opening avenues for broader implications in geriatric care and chronic illness management.

In conclusion, Jamshidi et al.’s research represents a critical advancement in our understanding of the interplay between social support, mental health, and quality of life in geriatric cancer outpatients. By highlighting the significant role that social connections play in managing anxiety and depression, the work calls upon healthcare professionals to incorporate these elements into patient care strategies. It reaffirms the sentiment that health is not merely the absence of disease, but a holistic pursuit of well-being that encompasses physical, emotional, and social dimensions.

As we continue to navigate the complexities of cancer care, integrating mental health support into the healthcare framework will be vital. The study serves as a pivotal reminder of the profound impact that social support can have on health outcomes. Moving forward, the challenge lies in implementing these findings into practice, ensuring that elderly patients not only survive cancer but thrive throughout their treatment journey.

Strong advocacy for this model of care will likely lead to better health outcomes and enhanced patient satisfaction. The future of cancer treatment, especially among the elderly, may well depend on our ability to recognize and address the psychosocial needs alongside medical interventions. Innovation in care strategies centered around these findings will not only transform the patient experience but may also fundamentally change how we understand cancer treatment on a societal level.

In a world where the focus tends to center on treatment protocols and medical technologies, it is crucial to remember that the human experience of illness remains intimately connected to social relationships. Jamshidi et al.’s groundbreaking study illuminates this path forward as we strive for a more compassionate and effective approach to cancer care among the elderly.

Subject of Research: The relationships between social support, hospital anxiety-depression, and quality of life in geriatric cancer outpatients under oncology treatments

Article Title: Investigating the relationships between social support and hospital anxiety-depression with quality of life in geriatric cancer outpatients under oncology treatments

Article References:

Jamshidi, N., Mehravar, F., Alizadeh-Khoei, M. et al. Investigating the relationships between social support and hospital anxiety- depression with quality of life in geriatric cancer outpatients under oncology treatments.
BMC Geriatr 25, 834 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06497-1

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06497-1

Keywords: Geriatric cancer patients, social support, mental health, quality of life, oncology treatments, anxiety, depression.

Depression among older adults is a multifaceted phenomenon, often exacerbated by the physical and emotional burdens imposed by chronic illnesses such as diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and arthritis. Traditional approaches have predominantly treated depressive symptoms as a homogeneous entity, frequently overlooking the heterogeneity within the affected population. The latent profile analysis employed in this study serves as a sophisticated tool that identifies distinct subgroups based on symptom severity and symptom clusters, effectively mapping the psychological landscape of depression in ways older methodologies could not. This nuanced stratification is crucial because it reveals that depression in this cohort does not manifest uniformly but rather presents via diverse emotional and cognitive symptom constellations.

Employing large-scale data from a representative sample of older adults with chronic conditions, the researchers systematically collected self-reported measures of depressive symptoms alongside quantitative assessments of perceived social support. The latent profile analysis carved the dataset into discrete groups characterized by varying levels of symptom intensity and types. This segmentation enabled the identification of profiles ranging from minimal depressive symptoms to severe and pervasive depression, each profile conveying distinct clinical implications. For example, some profiles demonstrated heightened affective symptoms such as sadness and anhedonia, whereas others were marked by cognitive disturbances including feelings of worthlessness and impaired concentration.

This refined profiling approach holds tremendous promise for personalized healthcare. Older individuals within the severe symptom profiles are likely candidates for more intensive psychological and psychiatric interventions, including pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy. Conversely, those exhibiting mild or moderate depressive symptoms could benefit from less intensive support systems emphasizing social engagement and community-based resources. This tailored approach not only optimizes resource allocation but also enhances treatment efficacy, which is vital in healthcare settings constrained by limited personnel and financial resources.

A pivotal dimension of this study is its comprehensive evaluation of social support networks and how their presence—or lack thereof—modulates the depressive profiles. Social support, defined here as the perceived availability of emotional, instrumental, and informational assistance from family, friends, and community, emerged as a significant protective factor. The data underscored a negative correlation between the strength of social support and the likelihood of belonging to more severe depressive symptom profiles. In other words, older adults with robust social networks exhibited resilience against intense depressive episodes, emphasizing the psychosocial buffering hypothesis.

From a neurological perspective, the mechanisms through which social support mitigates depression can be partly explained by its influence on stress regulation. Social support facilitates the attenuation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity, reducing cortisol levels implicated in mood disorders. This neuroendocrine modulation offers a biological substrate that complements the psychosocial framework, connecting external social environments with internal physiological states. Such integrative understanding accentuates the importance of fostering community connectivity as a non-pharmacological strategy to combat depression in older adults.

The implications of these findings extend beyond clinical psychology to public health policy and eldercare program design. Health systems are increasingly confronted with the dual challenges of managing chronic physical illnesses and their attendant mental health issues among aging populations. This study advocates for the incorporation of mental health screenings that account for latent depressive profiles into routine assessments for older patients with chronic diseases. Early identification and intervention tailored to specific depressive profiles could potentially reduce hospital readmissions, enhance quality of life, and decrease healthcare costs related to untreated mental illness.

Furthermore, this research calls attention to the critical role that social infrastructures play in maintaining psychological well-being. Community centers, volunteer organizations, and social clubs, which often serve as hubs for elder social interaction, need strategic support and expansion. Facilitating access to such platforms may, in effect, serve as preventative medicine. This highlights a pressing societal need to combat social isolation, a ubiquitous and insidious problem in aging populations that exacerbates mental health problems including depression.

Technologically, the methodological framework of latent profile analysis can be adapted and scaled using machine learning algorithms applied to even larger datasets, including electronic health records and wearable health technology outputs. Such advancements could enable real-time monitoring and dynamic profiling of depressive symptoms, paving the way for targeted digital interventions. These might include teletherapy, app-based mood tracking, and AI-driven social support matchmaking, tailored to the unique symptomatology uncovered through latent profiling.

The latent profile analysis methodology itself deserves further attention, as it represents a shift towards greater analytic sophistication in psychological research. Unlike conventional clustering techniques, latent profile analysis incorporates probabilistic models that acknowledge data variability and uncertainty, enabling more accurate subgroup identifications. This statistical refinement enhances reproducibility and clinical relevance, setting a new gold standard for psychiatric epidemiology research.

Moreover, this research addresses critical gaps in understanding the bidirectional relationship between chronic physical illnesses and depression. Previous models often considered depression a consequence of chronic disease, but the latent profile findings suggest complex interactions where depressive symptom profiles can influence disease progression and management adherence. This bi-directionality points to the necessity of integrated care models where mental health services are embedded within chronic disease management programs.

Despite its numerous strengths, the study acknowledges inherent limitations, such as reliance on self-reported data, which may introduce response biases. Cultural factors influencing both the expression of depressive symptoms and social support perceptions require further cross-cultural validations. Future studies could incorporate biological markers such as inflammatory cytokine levels to triangulate findings and enhance the biological validity of these depressive profiles.

In conclusion, the pioneering work by Liu and colleagues illuminates the multifaceted nature of depression in older adults facing chronic diseases, while unveiling the potent ameliorative effects of social support. By harnessing latent profile analysis, the study transcends simplistic diagnostic categories, empowering clinicians and policymakers with a refined understanding that can transform elder mental healthcare. As aging populations grow globally, integrating psychosocial strategies into clinical and community frameworks is not only a medical imperative but a societal obligation.

This profound exploration into depressive symptomatology and social connectedness represents a seminal advance in geriatric psychology, offering hope that targeted interventions can mitigate the shadow of depression overshadowing many chronic disease journeys. It sets a foundational precedent for future interdisciplinary research and innovative care paradigms designed to uplift the mental health and dignity of our elders in the twilight years.

Subject of Research: Latent profile analysis of depressive symptoms in older adults with chronic diseases and the impact of social support.

Article Title: Latent profile analysis of depressive symptoms in older patients with chronic diseases and their relationship with social support study.

Article References:
Liu, L., Wang, W., Gong, X. et al. Latent profile analysis of depressive symptoms in older patients with chronic diseases and their relationship with social support study. BMC Psychol 13, 1023 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03376-7

Image Credits: AI Generated

The original Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program (ASSIP) has demonstrated success in reducing suicide attempts among the general population. However, given the distinct psychological and social dynamics influencing suicidal behavior in older adults, it became essential to modify the intervention to fit this group’s unique profiles. ASSIP-OA endeavors to fill this gap by customizing treatment delivery, session structure, and supportive resources, distinguishing it significantly from the original model. The forthcoming multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) will investigate ASSIP-OA alongside Treatment as Usual (TAU), aiming to determine whether this tailored intervention can effectively prevent suicidal episodes and improve mental health outcomes in older adults.

The clinical trial planning to take place in multiple Swedish psychiatric centers involves recruiting 132 participants aged 65 and above, each having recently experienced a suicide attempt or hospitalization related to serious suicidal ideation. This open-label, two-group parallel study will randomize participants to receive either the standard care offered by psychiatric services or the enhanced support provided by ASSIP-OA in addition to standard care. One of the trial’s distinguishing features is the flexibility imbued within the intervention, allowing home visits, adjustment of session duration, or breaks as needed. These modifications recognize the physical and cognitive limitations that may be associated with older age, ensuring that treatment remains accessible and effective.

Further customization is evident in the inclusion of an additional session involving relatives or other support persons. This extension acknowledges the often critical role family and caregivers play in the mental health trajectories of older adults. By fostering communication and support networks, ASSIP-OA transcends individual therapy to embrace a broader psychosocial context. Additionally, the intervention adapts linguistic content and homework assignments to resonate more deeply with older participants, reflecting age-specific cognitive styles, life experiences, and emotional needs. Letters sent as part of the intervention also undergo age-specific refinement, aiming to maintain engagement and motivation over the course of two years.

Crucially, the study’s primary endpoint centers on the recurrence of suicidal episodes, whether fatal or non-fatal. This outcome reflects the ultimate goal of any suicide prevention program: the safeguarding of life. Secondary outcomes will provide a comprehensive picture of the intervention’s impact, including changes in psychiatric symptomatology, the severity of suicidal ideation, coping styles, and quality of life metrics. By capturing data across these domains, the study strives to elucidate the nuanced ways in which ASSIP-OA may improve older adults’ mental health and resilience.

Beyond efficacy, the trial emphasizes the feasibility and acceptability of ASSIP-OA within routine healthcare settings. Assessing healthcare utilization patterns and monitoring potential negative effects of treatment will be vital to ensuring that ASSIP-OA can be sustainably integrated into existing mental health services. The researchers’ commitment to adaptability, personalization, and broad outcome measurement reflects a crucial shift toward patient-centered care in psychiatry, particularly for a group often marginalized in clinical research.

The significance of this study extends beyond its immediate clinical application. It challenges entrenched paradigms that often treat older adults as a homogenous group or overlook their specific mental health needs. The heterogeneity among older individuals is considerable; chronic illness, social isolation, bereavement, and cognitive changes uniquely influence suicidal behavior. By embedding this reality into the design of ASSIP-OA, the intervention exemplifies a sophisticated, empathetic approach that may represent a new standard for suicide prevention protocols globally.

Moreover, the trial’s design as a multicenter RCT provides robust scientific rigor and generalizability. Recruiting participants from diverse psychiatric services across Sweden ensures that findings will reflect real-world variability in clinical care environments and patient populations. This approach enhances the potential for widespread applicability and policy translation, which is crucial for addressing the persistent global challenge of late-life suicide.

Mental health professionals and policymakers will watch closely as this study unfolds, hopeful that ASSIP-OA delivers tangible benefits. The intervention’s potential to reduce suicide rates could transform clinical practice guidelines and stimulate the development of further age-tailored mental health interventions. Importantly, the research underscores a broader societal imperative: to prioritize the mental wellbeing of older adults with the same urgency and innovation afforded to younger populations.

In light of the rising proportion of older adults worldwide, understanding effective suicide prevention strategies tailored to this demographic is more critical than ever. ASSIP-OA has the potential to break new ground by marrying evidence-based approaches with the lived realities of older adults. The results of this carefully designed trial could serve as a beacon for future research and clinical practice, guiding a more compassionate, effective response to an urgent public health concern.

As the trial progresses, researchers are also mindful of ethical and logistical challenges. The open-label nature of the study reflects the necessity of transparency and patient involvement in older populations while retaining methodological robustness. Ongoing evaluation of treatment flexibility and engagement strategies aims to optimize adherence and minimize drop-out rates, which are common hurdles in clinical studies involving elderly participants.

Ultimately, this study represents a landmark effort to bring nuanced, empirically supported mental health care to a subset of the population that has historically been underrepresented in suicide prevention research. By integrating clinical innovation with person-centered adaptations, ASSIP-OA not only seeks to prevent suicide but also to enhance the overall quality of life for older adults struggling with suicidal thoughts and behaviors. The forthcoming findings are eagerly anticipated and may well herald a new epoch in psychiatric care for the aging population.

Subject of Research: Suicide prevention intervention for older adults aged 65 and above, specifically evaluating the effectiveness and feasibility of a modified Attempted Suicide Short Intervention Program adapted to this age group (ASSIP-OA).

Article Title: Attempted suicide short intervention program for older adults 65+ (ASSIP-OA): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Article References:
Hed, S., Berg, A.I., Tillfors, M. et al. Attempted suicide short intervention program for older adults 65+ (ASSIP-OA): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 25, 588 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07016-7

Image Credits: AI Generated

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-025-07016-7