<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mediterranean Basin &#8211; Science</title>
	<atom:link href="https://scienmag.com/tag/mediterranean-basin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://scienmag.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 08:42:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">73899611</site>	<item>
		<title>Mosquito ancestry shapes chikungunya and dengue risk across the Mediterranean</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/mosquito-ancestry-shapes-chikungunya-and-dengue-risk-across-the-mediterranean/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Juliet Wilcox]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 08:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aedes albopictus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arboviral risk mapping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arbovirus transmission risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arboviruses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Asian tiger mosquito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chikungunya]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chikungunya virus spread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dengue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dengue virus transmission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genetic ancestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasive Asian tiger mosquito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Invasive Species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediterranean Basin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediterranean invasive species impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediterranean mosquito populations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mosquito genetic ancestry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosquito vector competence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population genetics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[population genetics of invasive species]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector competence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vector control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zika]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Zika virus risk in Europe]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=243833</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study shows that the chaotic colonization history and genetic ancestry of Aedes albopictus populations in the Mediterranean significantly shape their competence to transmit chikungunya and dengue viruses, calling for geographically tailored vector control in Europe.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus, has earned its reputation as one of the world&#8217;s most hazardous invasive species. Since first establishing itself in the Mediterranean Basin in the early 1980s, it has spread across southern Europe and become increasingly implicated in local, or autochthonous, transmission of chikungunya and dengue viruses in regions where these diseases were once exclusively travel-associated. A new study published in Parasites &amp; Vectors now shows that the mosquito&#8217;s tangled colonization history is not just a curiosity of population genetics: the genetic ancestry of individual Mediterranean populations significantly shapes how competently they can acquire, disseminate and transmit chikungunya virus (CHIKV), dengue virus (DENV) and Zika virus (ZIKV), effectively redrawing the map of arboviral risk across Europe.</p>
<p>The research, led by Riccardo Piccinno and Anna Rodolfa Malacrida of the University of Pavia, together with colleagues at the Institut Pasteur in Paris and partners in Switzerland, Italy and the Balkans, set out to answer a deceptively simple question: do genetically distinct mosquito populations differ in their ability to transmit arboviruses? The answer, the authors report, is a clear yes, and the pattern they uncovered is striking. Neighboring mosquito populations with different genetic ancestries showed drastically different competence profiles for CHIKV and DENV, while geographically distant populations that share ancestry behaved similarly. In other words, for these viruses, where a mosquito&#8217;s genes came from matters more than where the mosquito lives.</p>
<p>To reach that conclusion, the team combined two complementary lines of evidence: population genetics and experimental vector competence assays. On the genetic side, they genotyped mosquitoes from an ancestral reference population in Guangzhou, China, and from ten adventive populations sampled across five Mediterranean regions, spanning Southern Switzerland, Northern and Central Italy, the Balkans and Greece. The markers of choice were highly polymorphic simple sequence repeats, or SSRs, which allow fine-scale discrimination of genetic lineages. Using the Bayesian clustering program STRUCTURE, the researchers assigned individuals to ancestry groups, and with the approximate Bayesian computation framework DIYABC-RF they reconstructed the demographic histories that produced the present-day genetic mosaic.</p>
<p>That history, the study finds, was anything but a single clean invasion wave. By combining historical records with demographic modeling, the authors show that the establishment of Aedes albopictus in the Mediterranean was driven by chaotic, discontinuous introductions of distinct lineages, followed by admixture events in which previously separated genetic backgrounds interbred. The result is high heterogeneity in both space and ancestry: populations separated by only a few hundred kilometers can carry markedly different genetic compositions, reflecting separate introduction routes, likely via the international trade in used tires and other commodities that has repeatedly ferried mosquito eggs across borders. This genetic patchwork, rather than a homogeneous expansion front, is the biological backdrop against which viral transmission now plays out.</p>
<p>The experimental half of the study measured vector competence using the standard trio of quantitative indices. Infection rate captures the proportion of mosquitoes in which the virus successfully establishes an infection in the midgut after an infectious blood meal; dissemination efficiency measures how many of those infected mosquitoes allow the virus to escape the midgut and spread to secondary organs, including the salivary glands; and transmission efficiency quantifies the fraction with virus present in the saliva, the prerequisite for onward transmission to a new host. Mosquitoes from each population were fed blood meals containing CHIKV strain 06.21, DENV-1, or ZIKV strain PE243, and these indices were scored at multiple days post-infection, specifically 7, 14 and 21 days, to track the temporal progression of infection.</p>
<p>Statistical analysis then linked the genetic and virological datasets. Univariate and multivariate models assessed whether population identity, ancestry group membership, and days post-infection were associated with each competence index. For CHIKV, the analyses identified day post-infection, population, and two ancestry components as significant factors associated with infection, with some ancestry fractions showing positive associations and others negative ones. For DENV, population and three ancestry components were significantly associated with infection rate, although the authors note that two of these lacked a biologically plausible monotonic trend across ancestry categories, meaning higher ancestry fractions did not simply translate into higher infection rates. For ZIKV, by contrast, no variable emerged as a significant predictor, suggesting that the genetic heterogeneity captured in this study does not translate into measurable variation in Zika competence among these populations.</p>
<p>The most consequential finding concerns CHIKV and DENV. Ancestry and population identity significantly influenced dissemination and transmission as well as infection, and the geographic pattern was counterintuitive: proximity did not predict similarity. Populations in neighboring geographical areas but with distinct ancestries exhibited drastically different competence profiles, whereas geographically distant populations sharing genetic ancestry displayed similar vector competence. This dissociation between geography and genetics implies that the introduction history of each local population, not local environmental conditions alone, has left a durable imprint on its capacity to transmit these viruses. It also suggests that the genetic variants governing viral infection and dissemination vary among source lineages, so that admixture has produced a mosaic of transmission potential across the region.</p>
<p>The public health implications are direct. Europe has experienced a rising trend of both imported and autochthonous arboviral infections in recent years, with chikungunya and dengue outbreaks recorded in Italy, France and elsewhere. If the mosquitoes buzzing in one province are substantially more competent vectors than those in the next, then uniform, region-wide control assumptions may misallocate resources. The authors argue that their results underscore the urgent need for localized, geographically tailored vector control strategies in Europe, in which surveillance and intervention intensity are calibrated to the actual transmission potential of local mosquito populations rather than to a generic regional estimate.</p>
<p>Methodologically, the study demonstrates the value of integrating fine-scale population genomics with standardized vector competence assays. The SSR-based genotyping, combined with STRUCTURE clustering and DIYABC-RF demographic inference, allowed the team to move beyond simple labels of origin and to quantify ancestry fractions within admixed populations. The logistic regression framework then made it possible to test the contribution of each factor while accounting for others, including the strong temporal effects of days post-infection that are well known to shape competence measurements. Supplementary analyses reported pairwise genetic differentiation among populations and detailed infection, dissemination and transmission rates stratified by virus, time point and population, providing a transparent record of the underlying data.</p>
<p>The work also carries broader lessons for invasion biology. Aedes albopictus is a textbook example of how global trade creates repeated, genetically diverse introductions, and this study shows that such demographic chaos can have functional consequences for disease transmission. As the climate warms and the mosquito&#8217;s suitable habitat expands northward, new introductions and further admixture are likely, potentially reshaping vector competence in currently lower-risk areas. Understanding the provenance of each new population, the authors suggest, should therefore become part of the risk-assessment toolkit, alongside entomological surveillance and case monitoring, if Europe is to anticipate rather than merely react to the next arboviral emergence.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Vector competence and population genetics of invasive Aedes albopictus mosquitoes in the Mediterranean Basin</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Provenance and competence for CHIKV and DENV of Aedes albopictus populations</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Piccinno, R., Madec, Y., Mariconti, M., Fiorenza, G., Carraretto, D., Forneris, F., Flacio, E., Coletti, S., Gasperi, G., Failloux, A.-B., &amp; Malacrida, A. R. (2026). Provenance and competence for CHIKV and DENV of Aedes albopictus populations. <em>Parasites &amp;amp; Vectors</em>. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07705-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07705-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-026-07705-6" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1186/s13071-026-07705-6</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Aedes albopictus, Asian tiger mosquito, vector competence, chikungunya, dengue, Zika, population genetics, Mediterranean Basin, invasive species, arboviruses, genetic ancestry, vector control</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">243833</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sardinia&#8217;s Fire Future: Climate Change Set to Nearly Double Wildfire Danger on Mediterranean Island</title>
		<link>https://scienmag.com/sardinias-fire-future-climate-change-set-to-nearly-double-wildfire-danger-on-mediterranean-island/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sloane Callahan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 22:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[burn probability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change adaptation strategies for Sardinia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate change impact on Mediterranean wildfires]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[climate projections and fire spread simulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMIP6]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crown fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Severity Rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detailed spatial analysis of wildfire danger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire regime transformation due to climate change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire spread modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fire Weather Index]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[future wildfire hazard mapping Sardinia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global warming effects on wildfire frequency and severity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[high-resolution climate modeling for wildfire risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international wildfire research collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediterranean Basin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mediterranean island wildfire management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sardinia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socio-economic pathways and wildfire risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSP scenarios]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildfire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wildfire risk prediction in Sardinia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://scienmag.com/?p=215000</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A new study combining CMIP6 climate projections with high-resolution fire spread simulations finds that wildfire danger days and annual burned area in Sardinia could roughly double by mid-century, with fire-prone hotspots expanding from the island's south into western and inland regions.]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sardinia, the second-largest island in the Mediterranean Basin, already battles roughly 2,900 wildfire ignitions every year, and a small fraction of those fires accounts for more than half of the land burned. Now, a new open-access study published in the journal Natural Hazards suggests that the decades ahead could transform the island&#8217;s fire regime in ways that fire managers are only beginning to grasp. By coupling high-resolution climate projections with sophisticated fire spread simulations, an international team of researchers has produced some of the most detailed spatial maps yet of how global warming will reshape wildfire danger and hazard across a fire-prone Mediterranean landscape.</p>
<p>The research, led by Michele Salis and Liliana Del Giudice of Italy&#8217;s National Research Council Institute of BioEconomy, together with colleagues from Spain, Iran and other institutions, focused on two time windows: a historical baseline from 1985 to 2014 and a near-future period from 2035 to 2064. The team drew on three state-of-the-art climate models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6, known as CMIP6, namely ACCESS-ESM1-5, EC-EARTH3 and MPI-ESM1-2-HR, each run under three Shared Socioeconomic Pathways spanning low to very high greenhouse gas emissions. What sets this study apart is the resolution: the raw climate model output, which arrives at a coarse scale of tens of kilometers, was statistically downscaled to a grid of just one square kilometer using a two-step technique combining parametric quantile mapping with geostatistical regression, before feeding into fire danger calculations and fire spread modeling.</p>
<p>To quantify fire danger, the researchers applied the Canadian Forest Fire Weather Index System, the same harmonized method used across Europe by the European Forest Fire Information System since 2007. The FWI integrates daily maximum temperature, minimum relative humidity, wind speed and cumulative precipitation into a single rating of potential fire intensity, and it depends on three fuel moisture codes that track the dryness of fine fuels, duff and deep organic layers. The team also calculated the Daily Severity Rating, a metric that amplifies the influence of extreme FWI values and estimates how difficult a fire burning that day would be to suppress. Both indices were computed for every pixel of the island on every day of the two study periods, for each climate model and each emissions scenario.</p>
<p>The signal that emerged was consistent across all three models, though its magnitude varied. Under the historical baseline, days with very high FWI values were rare, concentrated almost entirely in the May-to-October fire season, when high and very high danger conditions already accounted for roughly 43 to 46 percent of days. By the 2035-2064 period, the picture shifts dramatically. Under the highest emissions scenario, SSP5-8.5, the EC-EARTH3 model projected that very high FWI days would more than double during the fire season, climbing from about 4.6 percent to 10.8 percent of days, while the ACCESS model showed a rise from 4.0 to 10.1 percent. Even the more conservative MPI model projected a near doubling, from 4.5 to 8.2 percent. The Daily Severity Rating told a parallel story, with very high severity days under EC-EARTH3 rising from 8.4 percent to 17.1 percent of fire-season days under the worst-case pathway.</p>
<p>Underlying these danger trends is a straightforward climatic mechanism. All models project warmer and drier conditions for Sardinia, with maximum temperature increases reaching up to about 3.3 degrees Celsius annually and 3.9 degrees during the fire season under high emissions. Precipitation declines across the board, particularly in western and central sectors of the island, and the number of rainy days drops markedly, especially during the hottest months, pointing to longer and more frequent dry spells that desiccate fuels. Intriguingly, the analysis of wind conditions on extreme danger days showed that the projected increase in very high fire weather comes mostly from more days with low and moderate winds rather than stronger winds, suggesting that rising temperatures and reduced rainfall, not windier conditions, will be the dominant drivers of intensifying fire risk.</p>
<p>But the study went a crucial step beyond danger indices. Weather alone does not make a wildfire; fires need ignitions, flammable fuels and terrain that allows spread. To capture those interactions, the team built a probabilistic fire simulation framework using the Minimum Travel Time algorithm, which computes the fastest possible paths of fire growth across a landscape and calculates spread rates with the Rothermel surface fire model, while crown fire initiation follows the Van Wagner approach. The researchers ran tens of thousands of simulated fire footprints, 50,000 under baseline conditions alone, at a fine 150-meter resolution, randomly drawing weather streams, wind directions and fire durations from frequency distributions derived for three weather zones covering northern, central and southern Sardinia. Ignition points were placed according to probability grids built from two decades of historical fire records, and fuel moisture inputs were anchored in field measurements collected on the island, including live fuel moisture values between 65 and 100 percent depending on vegetation type.</p>
<p>The hazard outputs are striking. Under historical conditions, the models simulated an average annual burned area of roughly 11,700 to 15,400 hectares, consistent with the observed mean of about 14,700 hectares per year, or 0.65 percent of the island&#8217;s surface. In the future simulations, that figure nearly doubles or more. Under EC-EARTH3 and SSP5-8.5, the average annual area burned jumps to approximately 33,590 hectares, a 250 percent increase over the baseline, while ACCESS projects more than 30,000 hectares per year under the two higher-emission scenarios. Crown fire area, a measure of the most intense and dangerous fire behavior in forests, rises from between roughly 730 and 1,060 hectares per year historically to as much as about 2,020 hectares per year under the worst-case combination of model and scenario.</p>
<p>Perhaps most important is where these changes unfold. Historically, burn probability hotspots have been concentrated in southern Sardinia, with annual burn probabilities exceeding 4 hectares per square kilometer in localized zones. The future projections show those hotspots expanding in both magnitude and extent, pushing into western and interior regions of the island. Under SSP5-8.5, much of the island shifts toward higher burn probability classes, with localized increases above 10 hectares per square kilometer in the main southern hotspot zones. Crown fire probability rises in parallel, with the most pronounced gains in southern and western Sardinia, where some areas reach values exceeding 8.5 hectares per square kilometer. This westward and inland expansion matters because those regions, including areas hit by major fires such as the Montiferru blaze of 2021, are already among the most fire-affected parts of the island, and inland zones lack the moderating influence of the sea that cushions coastal areas.</p>
<p>One of the study&#8217;s most thought-provoking findings is a caveat about what fire danger indices can and cannot tell us. Despite the systematic rise in FWI values, the simulated average flame length and average fire size did not increase consistently from the historical to the future period, partly because the extra extreme-danger days occurred disproportionately under low and moderate winds. The authors stress that extreme fire weather is necessary but not sufficient for large wildfires: a blaze must also start, escape initial suppression and find continuous fuels to spread across. Simply equating projected FWI maps with future fire risk, as some earlier studies have done, therefore overstates the certainty of the picture. Probabilistic spread modeling, which integrates weather, ignitions, fuels and landscape connectivity, provides a far more realistic estimate of where fire exposure will actually grow.</p>
<p>The researchers acknowledge limitations, notably that fuel layers and ignition patterns were held constant to isolate the climate signal, an assumption that could either understate or overstate future hazard depending on how land abandonment, fuel accumulation and fire activity themselves evolve. Still, the message for the Mediterranean is unambiguous. The authors argue that suppression-oriented strategies alone cannot cope with the projected intensification, and they call for proactive, integrated risk management: landscape-scale fuel treatments, grazing, prescribed burning, fire-resilient land-use mosaics and spatial planning that accounts for expanding fire-prone zones. As record seasons sweep southern Europe, with more than one million hectares burned across the EU in 2025 alone, Sardinia&#8217;s high-resolution glimpse of the future offers both a warning and a practical roadmap for landscapes on the front line of a warming world.</p>
<p><strong>Subject of Research:</strong> Projected effects of climate change on wildfire danger and hazard in Sardinia, Italy</p>
<p><strong>Article Title:</strong> Climate change will reshape future wildfire danger and hazard in Sardinia, Italy</p>
<p><strong>Article References:</strong> Climate change will reshape future wildfire danger and hazard in Sardinia, Italy. (n.d.). <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08320-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08320-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Image Credits:</strong> AI Generated</p>
<p><strong>DOI:</strong> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-026-08320-5" rel="noopener noreferrer">10.1007/s11069-026-08320-5</a></p>
<p><strong>Keywords:</strong> wildfire, climate change, Sardinia, Mediterranean Basin, Fire Weather Index, burn probability, fire spread modeling, CMIP6, SSP scenarios, crown fire, Daily Severity Rating, fire management</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">215000</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
